« Closing Bell: Vote, Again Tuesday Links »

September 28, 2009

Monday Blogwrap

Play%20Here%20-%20092809.jpg
Ban Bikes on Brooklyn Bridge Walkway? [Gothamist]
Robicelli's One Year Anniversary [Eat it]
Last Day of the Myrtle Avenue El [CHB]
Paving Truck Falls Through Wyckoff Sidewalk [BushwickBK.com]
The Job of a Brooklyn Cop [BTB]
Play Here. Photo by kizzzbeth from the Brownstoner Flickr Pool.




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/11637

Comments

Either ban cars or ban tourists.

Posted by: denton at September 28, 2009 4:36 PM

What a sad photo. Summer's not coming back, is it?

Posted by: infinitejester at September 28, 2009 4:37 PM

Congrats Robicellis!!

Posted by: italiana71 at September 28, 2009 4:39 PM

As somebody who rides their bike over the bridge every so often it shocks me how many pedestrians seem not to be able to understand how to decipher which symbol means bike and which ped. If each group stayed to their side of the bridge it would be fine but somehow you always get groups of peds strolling through the bike lane.

Posted by: wasder at September 28, 2009 4:41 PM

wasder, they're EUROTRASH!

Posted by: denton at September 28, 2009 5:01 PM

1) there is not enuf room on brooklyn bridge walkway for all the pedestrians and they far outnumber bicyclists.
So walk the effing bike on the bridge.
(can the cyclists ever read the dismount signs)

2) plenty of cyclists use the pedestrian only walkway on Manhattan bridge even tho they have there own on same bridge...another case of cyclists cannot read.

Posted by: Petebklyn at September 28, 2009 5:07 PM

"So walk the effing bike on the bridge.
(can the cyclists ever read the dismount signs)"

Pete, here you are blaming the cyclists because peds walk in the bike lane?

Posted by: denton at September 28, 2009 5:26 PM

Agreed, petebkln.

I can't believe that people think that a major tourist attraction like the BK Bridge wouldn't have peds who don't interfere with cyclists.

Anyone who makes statements like "can't decipher symbols" is just being perverse. Try not to be the so entitled and work with others.

And I speak as a regular cyclist. I always defer to pedestrians, "right" or "wrong".

Posted by: cmu at September 28, 2009 5:45 PM

I just yell at the tourists and they generally get out of my way. Ever been to Munich? They have bike lanes on the sidewalks that are marked up like the walkway on the BB, and the bikers will surely let you know to get out of their way before they run you over.
Seems to work just fine and adds a little fun to the ride over the bridge.

Posted by: Brokedeveloper at September 28, 2009 6:09 PM

so many bicyclists are just so rude.
walk your bicycle across the bridge when it is crowded, don't look upon pedestrians as a lower life form because they are not strapped on to an aluminum frame on wheels.
sheesh, remember you are hurting your erectile function with every mile, pedestrians are not.


Posted by: Minard Lafever at September 28, 2009 8:26 PM

Minard,
I have walked and ridden across the bridge and I am not sure why you consider the bicyclists rude. When I walk, I stay on the pedestrian side. When I bike, I stay on the bike side. I have never seen a problem with bicyclist crossing over to the pedestrian side, but have seen many a pedestrian (mostly tourists) wandering around on the bike side, often defiantly. Seriously, it is not that freaking hard. When you are a biker, you can't really go that fast uphill (at least my fat a@# can't) anyway, so no need to walk the bike. When you go downhill, you just watch out for wandering pedestrians. I'll admit, a couple bikers are a little reckless with how fast they go on the downhill side, but they are in the bike lane.

Posted by: Brokedeveloper at September 28, 2009 10:05 PM

Please keep in mind that Minard is from the 19th Century.

Posted by: mopar at September 28, 2009 11:01 PM

My bike has a steel frame and my penis works fine.

Posted by: tybur6 at September 29, 2009 8:25 AM

Also, the bridge is about a mile-and-a-half long. Biking vs. walking -- it's the difference between a crossing time of about 10 minute and a half hour!

So, let's get back to the purpose of the bridge for a second. We all seem to agree that *cars* have a place on the bridge, right!? Why? Because the bridge was BUILT to bring people and goods across the river.

Bicycles are a standard and necessary form of vehicular transportation. (Yes, necessary... try to fit another car on the bridge... and don't counter with "take the subway" because the folks in cars can do that too!)

So, what groups is the unintended group? Wandering tourists. Should they be banned from the bridge? Of course not, but they should understand that walking into a lane for VEHICULAR TRAFFIC is not acceptable. If someone wanders into the middle of the street... is the car/taxi/bus driver being "rude" when they honk at them (or even hit them)?!

It's not an us vs. them situation. You say the bridge is oh so crowded... yeah, it's pretty crowded, but not so crowded that folks can't stay on their own sides!!!

I will continue to use the bridge. I will *ride* my bike on the bridge. And I will continue to shout angrily and make all sorts of noises when pedestrians wander into the BICYCLE LANE. It's not an issue of being a "higher life form" -- it's a matter of courtesy and safety. Yes, the lack of courtesy on the part of the walkers!

(You can make all the comments you want about bicycles breaking other traffic laws... but that has NOTHING to do with this issue. This is just about the Brooklyn Bridge.)

Posted by: tybur6 at September 29, 2009 8:38 AM

Does not play well with others...

Posted by: northsloperenter at September 29, 2009 10:02 AM

The problem is that cyclists want to have it both ways. They want to be accorded all the privilages of vehicles but do not want to abey any of the laws of vehicles. They ride the wrong way down one-way and two-way streets, go through lights and other traffic signs, and then go up onto sidewalks or other pedestrain paths when they feel like it.

Posted by: BH76 at September 29, 2009 10:13 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions