« Open Thread Green Church Completely Gonezo Now »

August 12, 2009

Fear (of Condos) and Self-Loathing in Williamsburg

nv_081209.jpg
What happens when you mix the snide aspects of hipster culture with the gleaming new developments that have popped up in Williamsburg, Greenpoint, and Fort Greene? Condo shame, says the Observer. The hipsters who once scoffed at new developments like The Edge or nV are now—ironically, perhaps—experiencing a desire to buy units in these buildings (gasp!). In the current market, it's the modern units that are suddenly in the price range of 20- and 30-something new buyers, while the common brownstone fantasy still costs over $1 million. The article chronicles several 20-somethings such as Kendall Turner, 23, who bought a $449,000 one-bedroom in the Ikon building on McCarren Park in Greenpoint, or Nicole Ferejohn, 27, who refused to give in to her condo urges and continues to rent. Those profiled in the article make excuses and apologies; they feel guilt for their un-Brooklyn-y purchases; but in the end, perhaps the point is that if you price it low enough, they will (begrudgingly) come.
Condo Shame [NY Observer]




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/10977

Comments

quote:
The hipsters who once scoffed at new developments like The Edge or nV are now—ironically, perhaps—experiencing a desire to buy units in these buildings (gasp!).

i.dont.think.so.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 9:36 AM

quote:
modern units that are suddenly in the price range of 20- and 30-something new buyers

oh i REALLY dont think so

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 9:37 AM

I would never buy in williamsburg no matter how cheap it became.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at August 12, 2009 9:40 AM

Rob,
I don't understand... "such as Kendall Turner, 23, who bought a $449,000 one-bedroom"

What 23 year old can't afford a 1/2 million dollar home! It only required $100,000 in your pocket, and $2,400 a month plus taxes and maintenance. Seems like the standard situation for the average New Yorker.

I know that I'm gonna see a man about buying a few of these.

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 9:41 AM

im just trying to wrap my mind around a 23 year first time buyer of a 1/2 million dollar apt. wtf? clearly i've wasted the last 10 years of my life.

maybe it's not guilt about the condo itself, maybe it's guilt due to parental hand-outs?

and yes, jealousy is a disease. i know that!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 9:43 AM


By the way, I'm glad Nicole Ferejohn could resist those "urges" to buy... I know I've been fighting those urges for years.

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 9:44 AM

What!
so a condo costs $499K and these willy-b denizen/hipster types who are always the struggling-artists/bartenders/waiters/clothing store workers have 10% (49K)lying around to use as a down payment on a 500K condo?

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 9:44 AM

theoretically tho, kendall and nicole could be one of the gazillion coke dealers in williamsburg. so these apts and down payments are chump change.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 9:47 AM


gemini... there's nothing about this post or the NY Observer article that has anything to do with reality. The folks buying these condos are the SAME folks with ridiculous overinflated wages in god knows what 'industry' (trust me I wish I knew their secret) and HUGE chunks of cash from some source.... mom/dad/grandma/prize pig.

These are the same folks that are buying condos and coops in Park Slope and Cobble Hill... just with tighter jeans and malnutrition. There's nothing 'struggling' about them... and they haven't worked in a clothing store since they were 16, if they ever have.

Someone posted yesterday... there's way too many $450-600k units flooding the market in Brooklyn. Most of the probably should be $200k units, but they are "luxury," right? Luxury for all of the "hipsters."

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 9:50 AM

If you own a half million dollar condo - you are not a hipster.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 9:53 AM

people in this story are hilarious. take themselves way to seriously.

Posted by: eh at August 12, 2009 9:55 AM

people in this story are hilarious. take themselves way to seriously.

Posted by: eh at August 12, 2009 9:55 AM

Ummmm, I think that would be MOST people in NYC.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at August 12, 2009 9:57 AM

this city makes me cry sometimes.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 9:57 AM

it seems like these articles are designed to tick people off. while the people in the article come off as jerks, i think the "journalists" who write the articles are the bigger jerks for continuing to push this idea that these situations are much more widespread than they are in reality. there are 20-something getting help from their parents but presumably that is less the case now than 5-10 years ago with the market down so much.

Posted by: CG_ups at August 12, 2009 9:58 AM

Tyburg6's 9:50 QOTD

Posted by: InsertSnappyNameHere at August 12, 2009 10:00 AM

totally cg ups, i agree with you. it's a bit masochistic even reading these kinds of stories, yet i always find myself doing so and getting annoyed and feeling like a big ole loser. it's like giving a jump rope to someone in a wheelchair!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 10:00 AM

Truth of the matter is, as tyburg said, there are plenty of early 20's people from various industries that can afford these. I don't make a six figure salary but know a few that do and not all of them are/were in finance fields. Some jobs do pay very very well.

I aint hatin but I do wish I would make enough to afford a 500K condo. (I would rather buy a house with that money but still).

Posted by: Kensingtonian at August 12, 2009 10:02 AM

“I have a deeply rooted dislike of expedient, cookie-cutter, pseudo-luxury condo developments and would almost rather blow money renting something ‘real’ with history, a story, the possibility that some woman once gave birth in my bedroom with or without a midwife or a lesbian couple had V-Day sex in the bathroom,” he said.


WHAT THE F*CK!!?

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 10:06 AM

CGups - VERY true!
well I want to know what industry(aside from banking/finance) pays twenty-somethings $150K or more for mid-level jobs.
I am in my 30's and havne't broken 100K yet and I work in the music biz
I always thought most peeps who live in Willy-B are artist types who work as bartenders/waiters at night
maybe I am wrong

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 10:08 AM

dh, old houses have a lot of history and oftentimes "ghosts." That's usually the fun part. i get what they are saying.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at August 12, 2009 10:09 AM

omg dipster, WHERE did you find that quote? i love the valentines day lesbian sex part hahahah. how romantic. when i lived in harlem i told this one chick who moved in to the room next to me that it was seriously beyond haunted. totally scared the hell out of her hahahha


*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 10:12 AM

Yeah dave - i get what he was trying to say - but you're being interviewed by a newspaper. Please try to do a little bit better when trying to explain why you like older houses.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 10:13 AM

Prize pig...so *that's* the secret to buying a half-million-dollar condo when you're 24!

'Scuse me, gotta go feed the pigs...

Posted by: Brenda from Flatbush at August 12, 2009 10:14 AM

gem, you are wrong.

I know a couple of people that bought condos in willyburg and they are under 30 and professionals. Both make over six figures. One runs a boutique interactive marketing company that has 12 employees, another is a chiropractor with 2 offices (one in Harlem and another on Upper West side).

Posted by: Kensingtonian at August 12, 2009 10:16 AM

Condo Shame? So much so that they agreed to spill their guts to a newspaper? The premise of the article is utter nonsense. Are people in this town so superficial that even housing choices have to be rationalized? Live where ever the hell you want. You have the option of not basing your identity on your address.

Posted by: LilBitOfLuck at August 12, 2009 10:18 AM

This whole thing reminds me of the television news crews who somehow always seem to find the resident slack-jawed yokel to interview after something has happened. These pieces gather up the most disgust-inducing specimens and put them on display so that everyone can point and laugh or simply shake their heads in dismay. I too doubt these folks are representative of what's happening in the real estate market. I think the need to sell papers/stories regardless of why you read the piece has become king in the news industry.

Posted by: InsertSnappyNameHere at August 12, 2009 10:18 AM

Does anyone have 50k I could borrow?

Btw - I live directly behind the Ikon building and have been inside for open houses. The layouts suck, all the apts are like long railroads.

She could have gotten a better 1 bedroom for 440k.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 10:19 AM

gemini, don't feel bad. When I was 30 (10 yrs ago) I was earning $32k.

Another field where you can earn $150K by 25 is "Biglaw" - the fancy prestigious law firms in NYC. At least you can till they go roll over and go tits up.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 12, 2009 10:20 AM

“You’d always be like, ‘No, dudes, I’m far more interesting than this apartment, I promise!’” said Ms. Ferejohn. “I just thought, that could never be me because I’m too … I’m too full of character to live in a place like that!”

and

“They’re so large and impersonal, and I just imagine someone sitting on their five infinity pools,” she said. “But maybe it’s just this artificial construct I’ve build up in my mind about the difference between my building and other buildings.”

and

“I naïvely had this idea that gentrification was inconsiderate and ruining old Brooklyn, but it wasn’t a well-thought-out position,” Ms Turner told The Observer.

ROFLMAO. But you gotta love the Observer for finding people who are so full of themselves!

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 10:22 AM

this is anecdotal evidence that supports a view that there is a huge intergenerational wealth transfer in america. 50+ years of post-war economic growth has created a generation with enough money to support their children's first homes. there is no way that i know of to measure this, unfortunately, so it will remain a thesis.

this might be one of various non-traditional pillars supporting urban, specifically nyc, real estate prices.

3x income or 10x annual rent roll? ha! not in nyc. or at least not until we relive the great depression.

Posted by: antidope at August 12, 2009 10:28 AM

this article is beyond dumb. i work with artists and creative types, etc... and i've never heard this sentiment.

also, a $500K apartment is not expensive if you make $125-200K a year. sorry Rob, but lots of folks do even in their 20's. and, many people can borrow/receive family money for the down payment.

all you need to do is see the people on the L in the morning to realize that they hood is not filled with baristas.

i'm in my 40's, so know lots of people who are not 20 and are quite successful that are my neighbors. just met the head designer for a major major mainstream clothing brand and my kid is having a playdate this weekend with his little girl.

since most of you don't know sh*t about wburg, you should really just stop making stuff up.

DIBS - you are missing the best dining, art, music and shopping in Brooklyn by avoid the burg. it's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Posted by: wine lover at August 12, 2009 10:29 AM

wine lover you are seriously the biggest blowhard on this site. you are everything wrong with nyc wrapped in a twirpy little package of a man im sure.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 10:33 AM

Wine lover, I do like Williamsburg, and Greenpoint (where I used to live). You'd have a lot more credibility if you could name one thing that you don't like about your neighborhood. Just one. That's all we ask.

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 10:34 AM

Kens:
ah ok so I might be off on my assumption of what Willy-B might be turning into, but as far as I am concerned you defintely still have that type of artist/cafe worker/bartender/shop keep type!

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 10:36 AM

Wine Lover... "also, a $500K apartment is not expensive if you make $125-200K a year."

Yeah... I don't think ANYONE denies this. However, I think MANY of us... including those of us that are in their early-30s and don't make close to 6-figures find this idea BAFFLING and frustrating.

Though, it should not be surprising that salaries in this city are just as irrational as the real estate prices.

Oh, and I think the problem is that we are starting to know *too much* about Williamsburg -- and it ain't pretty. :-)

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 10:39 AM

" I am concerned you defintely still have that type of artist/cafe worker/bartender/shop keep type!"

It's a mix - you still have the bartenders and the artsy fartsy folks, and you have some stinkin rich people.

Bartenders can make a sh*t ton of money. A friend of mine pulls in 80k a year bartending 5 nights a week (i did his taxes, it was legit)

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 10:40 AM

"Condo Shame? So much so that they agreed to spill their guts to a newspaper?"

Really! I cannot understand these exhibitionists who would consent to be interviewed for this kind of article (or, for that matter, any Real Estate Section article).

Do all these people need journalistic attention in order to feel validated?

Posted by: Sparafucile at August 12, 2009 10:40 AM

"A friend of mine pulls in 80k a year bartending 5 nights a week (i did his taxes, it was legit)"

D. Hipster, CPA? I didn't know that. That's pretty cool.

Posted by: Sparafucile at August 12, 2009 10:42 AM

"D. Hipster, CPA? I didn't know that. That's pretty cool."

Indeed! Thanks, but now the secret is out - I'm infact a nerdy accountant :(

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 10:44 AM

dipster, can you do my 2003-2004 state taxes for me before they haul my ghetto ass to jail?

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 10:47 AM

Um... yeah, maybe we're irresponsible, feckless and carrying a ton of law school debt, but we can't afford that crap -- so I also wonder, often, who are these people?

And if they have the downpayment, why on earth are they wasting it on 600 square feet of drywall and a fancy fridge?

Posted by: Heather at August 12, 2009 10:48 AM

I'm 30, and purchased my condo in Williamsburg 2 years ago. I purchased at 30% less than market and, put 20% down. I didn't get a handout from family, and I make less than 100k a year. I have been working since was 14, and have saved 20% from every check and bonus I have ever received. A lot of you need to stop complaining about what you haven’t been able to accomplish, and start noticing some people actually work their asses off to get ahead. You can keep mocking the Burg all you want, but the fact is it’s a great place to live. In 13 years, when I’m finished paying my mortgage, I am certain it will only be better, and most of you will still be complaining, and renting.

Posted by: quetal at August 12, 2009 10:49 AM

The article states their occupations. The two first mentioned are in finance, but obviously feel they are way too cool to be. My guess would be that the 27 year old can afford her apartment on her own, but the 23 year old is getting help from her parents.

Posted by: etson at August 12, 2009 10:50 AM

quote:
In 13 years, when I’m finished paying my mortgage, I am certain it will only be better, and most of you will still be complaining, and renting.


and say hello to me to your new section 8 neighbors on your floor.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 10:51 AM

I am gonna have to agree with Wine Lover.

One of my relatives has been living in Williamsburg for almost twenty years. She just graduated from Cornell Law School at age 27 and landed a job at a law firm that will pay her $170K/year. She still loves her neighborhood and like those new condo constructions.

As the owner of a three-family house, I understand that condos make much less sense financially speaking. But if you can afford it and don't want to deal with tenants or house repairs, then why not? What other options do you have? Buying a crappy co-op with crazy board rules and no washer/dryer in the apt?

Posted by: lostintranslation at August 12, 2009 10:53 AM

My point, which may seem strange, is that $170K or whatever isn't actually enough to pay for a 2-bedroom condo, especially considering you can rent the same space for half the cash.

Posted by: Heather at August 12, 2009 10:55 AM

The Observer is written by the perspective of its owner. He is a 30 year old who inherited a billion $ business from his father. And no matter what he does Ivanka will always be tref

Posted by: brickoven at August 12, 2009 10:56 AM

wow seriously brickover? ugh. i always wondered why i passionately detested that horrible salmon pink rag.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 10:59 AM

Quetal.. I hazard to guess that you ain't the typical person buying a half-million dollar property at 27. I doubt, very much, that Nicole in the article worked as hard as you...

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 11:01 AM

I don't understand why people get so uppity about parents helping out their kids, and why you all think this is exclusive to Williamsburg.

Have you taken a walk around Murray Hill lately or anywhere in Manhattan? Yeah, I'm sure the 23 year old girl in marketing who makes 20k a year can afford that 2800 dollar a month rental. But I guess a news article about the parents of transplants in Manhattan paying for their rent isn't very interesting - so find 2 people, throw in the buzz words "hipster" "williamsburg" and "lesbian" and you have a bunch more page hits.

I would say the majority of young people in this city (myself excluded of course, I rule) are living beyond their means on mommy and daddy's buck - yes even in your pretty tree lined neighborhood. so get off your high horse.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 11:01 AM

Heather! - right on!!

Quetal - congrats that you were able to save every penny you made to make a downpayment on a condo, but seriously did you live with your parents? Or maybe never bought an article of clothing or perhaps never went out to dinner?

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 11:04 AM

dirty hipster nothing wrong with getting some help from the folks as long as yu are not 40 and still going to the well....

Posted by: brickoven at August 12, 2009 11:05 AM

"My point, which may seem strange, is that $170K or whatever isn't actually enough to pay for a 2-bedroom condo, especially considering you can rent the same space for half the cash."

That is entirely dependent on what kind of deal you get and how much cash you're putting down.

Posted by: bjw2103 at August 12, 2009 11:06 AM

lol. i will NEVER get off my high horse about adults mooching off their parents. NEVER!

and yes i freely and readily admit im envious and jealous!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 11:09 AM

Dipster... TOTALLY agree with you. And I thoroughly resent *both* the parents and the children of those parents. The children are self-entitled douche bags and because they pay rent 3 or 4 times what their salary allows... I have to live in shit holes.

Fuck them and the horse they rode in on. :-)

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 11:09 AM

quetal - congrats! But somehow I think the people quoted in the article don't have your common sense.

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 11:12 AM


my mom has been retired for 5 years and lives well(still does some PT work), but she defintely doesn't have money to burn.
I needed to borrow some money a few months ago to get me over a difficult hump one month and it pained me to take even $500 from her and I am 34
I think it's one thing if your parents can and do help you buy your first house, or a car but again if you are asking your parents to supplment your monthly income on a regular basis in your 30's and 40's (and even in your 20's)it's sorta sad

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 11:14 AM

I dont think there is anything wrong with a 20 something getting some parental help. Its the 40 year old losers that still get help that annoy me

Posted by: brickoven at August 12, 2009 11:16 AM

When I was 23 I was paying off my student loans, and when I was 27 most of my available cash was going to paying my way through grad school at night.

I'm very impressed that people that young can command such high salaries without having gone into hock to get credentialed.

Posted by: Sparafucile at August 12, 2009 11:16 AM

DH, I'm not against parents helping kids out (obviously people have a right to spend their money how they please) but please, parents, do you really have to pay your kid's insane rent in a full-service building in Murray Hill? At least make them live in a walkup!

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 11:17 AM

First, Billyburgh may have great food, music and art, but its the ugliest neighborhood this side of West Beirut. I can hardly bear walking around there during the daylight hours (though I get that most residents there arent up during the daylight hours). And, no, McCarren Park doesnt count.

Second, thinking about two people having V-day sex in my bathroom is a reason NOT to move in.

Posted by: saminthehood at August 12, 2009 11:19 AM

See this is just another case of people living above their means.
In my 20's I never asked either parent for help - I lived in Jersey City Heights and paid $545 for my first apartment while supporting my deadbeat musician boyfriend and then broke up and got a sparkling Jersy City downtown apt for $1K a month. Oh and I owned a car and paid $300 a month for it. This was only a few years ago
so I agree with DH, kids epecially living in NYC live WAY above their means in ridiculously high priced apartments they share with some other kid who is getting help from their parents as well
please! many of my friends(in their 30's) STILL get monthly help from their parents - it's sad. case closed!

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 11:21 AM

even if it's two incredibly hot brazillian lipstick lesbians, sam?

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 11:24 AM

"its the ugliest neighborhood this side of West Beirut"

That's a silly statement.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 11:27 AM

Seriously sad... and I wonder if parents know it's a self-fulfilling prophecy type situation. As dirty hipster has pointed out, $1500 for a studio is CHEAP!

Yeah... really fucking cheap... the only reason it's cheap is because the Manhattan rents are almost twice that for even less square footage! The playing field isn't even because all of the "single" people out there get half of their income from their retarded parents.

Unreal.

P.S. I have two hot bisexual brazillian women having sex in my bathroom right now. Gotta go!

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 11:30 AM

All of you - ALL of you - would be in the same position as the interviewees in this article (their silly comments notwithstanding), if only you (or your parents) had some money, you nasty, petty, jealous people.

Since when does not having as much wealth as you wish you had make you better than everyone else?

(No I don't live in Williamsburg, no I don't make a six figure salary, and no I don't have rich folks)

Posted by: heck_of_a_job_brownie at August 12, 2009 11:31 AM

Nah... Billyburg is pretty brutal when it comes to the "nice looking neighborhood scale" It's rough.

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 11:32 AM

Saminthehood, having been to West Beirut, I can tell you that some parts of it are utterly gorgeous (and cosmopolitan, blah blah blah). Check out the panoramas of the AUB campus sometime.

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 11:35 AM

nothing wrong with having a subsidy in youre 20;s and a little in the 30's but if you are 40 and still taking you are pathetic. J

Posted by: brickoven at August 12, 2009 11:35 AM

"All of you - ALL of you - would be in the same position as the interviewees in this article (their silly comments notwithstanding), if only you (or your parents) had some money, you nasty, petty, jealous people."

Nope - my parents have offered me downpayment help and I've declined.

I'm 24 and by no means to I feel entitled to live in a brand spankin new half million dollar condo. I'd love to, but when I can afford it due to my hard work and achievements, not my parents.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 11:36 AM

quote:
Since when does not having as much wealth as you wish you had make you better than everyone else?

since the dawn of time!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 11:36 AM

"P.S. I have two hot bisexual brazillian women having sex in my bathroom right now. Gotta go!"

Tybur6, you live in Ditmas Park right? I'll be right over!

"I'm very impressed that people that young can command such high salaries without having gone into hock to get credentialed."

Sparafucile, credentials only matter in certain industries, and as more people get more credentials, those credentials will become meaningless. Sad but true.

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 11:38 AM

And it's all these parents just shelling out this money for their kids that are keeping the rents high in manhattan (and now brooklyn) under the rationale "oh, it's expensive in NYC, and I want my precious Madison to have a nice apt and not get killed in ghetto brooklyn"

Rents and the median incomes of certain neighborhoods are really outta f*ckin whack.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 11:38 AM

hmm maybe im being a hypocrite. when i was 23 and i was homeless i moved back in with my grandparents for 9 months. i wasnt paying them any rent, so i guess that is just as moochey. granted, their rent was only 35 dollars for a nice 2 bedroom apartment with a garage.. (yes it was section 8. or whatever section 8 was called back at that time in new jersey)


*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 11:39 AM

This thread is starting to become reminiscent of the HOTD thread where I got bashed last week. What I think is interesting is the resentment that is expressed towards those who can afford real estate in our fine borough. I thought we all liked Brooklyn for its diversity -- whether it be racial, cultural or economic. What am I missing? (OK, bash away....)

Posted by: Park Sloper at August 12, 2009 11:40 AM

"but seriously did you live with your parents? Or maybe never bought an article of clothing or perhaps never went out to dinner?"

I moved out of my Parents home when I was 17. I love to eat, and eat out regularly, but not all of the time, and you can buy clothes without breaking the bank. Actually, leaving in NYC, despite the high cost for housing, is incredibly cheap. So much to do for nothing, so many deals to be found. It just being responsible. Sure, I could go out and see a band, and drop a hundred bucks on beers, or I could go out, watch the same band, have just a couple of beers, and still have fun money for the weekend.

Posted by: quetal at August 12, 2009 11:46 AM

Park Sloper, I think one thing about this article that sets people off is the hypocrisy. Sorry for the following stereotypes, but it's what people imagine - here you have a bunch of young hipsters claiming to be all urban and gritty and rebellious, who are in fact quite wealthy and wind up pricing others out of the neighborhood. Back to DH's point about Murray Hill, at least the folks there (again speaking in stereotypes) don't pretend to be poor for aesthetic reasons.

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 11:48 AM

Heck of a Job:
Here's my personal story:
My parents divorced when I was 5. My father lived in a rental apartment in queens until his death a few years ago. He worked at the same job for 45 years. never spent a dime on clothes, vacations, nothing! He gave my mom $85 a week in child support until I was 18, she was a NYC teacher. He helped me pay 1 semester of college and the rest I did in student loans and worked at a full time job while going to school full time.
My dad was a hard scrapper queens type - beleived in hard work. He gave me gifts on Bdays and Christmas.
He dies and I was shocked to see he had left me his only child, a sizable inheritance, enough for a downpayment on the building in Park Slope I own today!

The lesson I learned: I learned to work hard, sacrifice, save, scrap and never expect anything from my parents.
I had no idea my father had all this money because he chose never to spend it and never to give me too much. His hard line approach is what made me a very independent person and I wish more people were raised the way I was. I don't believe in giving your kids handouts. I think instilling a good work ethic in your kid is a good thing.

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 11:50 AM

I never took any parental assistance until my thirties, when I really wanted to quit my job and still have health insurance until the baby was born. I'm still not ashamed of that, as there was no way I could have handled the sixty-hour weeks of earnings that started at 5AM while being really damn pregnant.

And gemini, were we neighbors in downtown JC? We had a $1K/month apartment there too.

If my family offered, I wouldn't turn down a downpayment... I'd just be very, very careful what I used it on. I'm not at all bitter that some people get help or make more money or save more than I ever have -- I'm flabbergasted that they squander their good fortune on real estate that looks like A Really Bad Deal. $450K for a brownstone in bed stuy? Probably a sound investment. The same money for a drywall box next to a blighted construction site next to another blighted construction site next to a toxic park? Notsomuch.

Posted by: Heather at August 12, 2009 11:51 AM

What I think seems to be missing from this discussion is the acknowledgment that people with money have ALWAYS handed this wealth off to their children in various forms. New York City is the wealthiest city in the country, and is where the term "old money" was born America.

That term implicitly implies that money is transferred from one generation to the next.

You might not agree with it, you might be jealous of it, but it doesn't change the fact that this is how the world works.

This thread is really showing some ugly jealousy in a lot of posters.


Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 11:54 AM

As a 40 yr old helping out my parents....
I would say not to get all bothered and envious about 23 yr olds affording such places if they are getting parental handouts, because it says nothing about your own progress in not being able to buy one at 23 without a parental handout.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 12, 2009 11:55 AM

Six, I understand what you're saying about hypocrisy. People working in finance are *not* hipsters (and it's funny to me that they aspire to be). That said, I think it's clear from the many spirited discussions on this blog that we all create our identities, in part, from where and how we choose to live. As we all know, even choosing to live in Brooklyn rather than Manhattan is a major statement in NYC. Isn't there a chance that most of us would probably like the investment banker who elects to live in Williamsburg better than her colleague who lives in Murray Hill? Living in B-Burg, or anywhere in Brooklyn, does say something about the person's values and interests.

Posted by: Park Sloper at August 12, 2009 11:57 AM

Quetal:

You are my new favorite poster. You are sensible, and I think we have similar stories. Besides the cost of housing, I find NYC to be extremely cheap. I've found an entire wardrobe worth of vintage clothing (mostly big names like Dior, Yves Saint Laurent, etc) for probably 500 bucks over the years.

That's about the same as some of these chicks in that article probably spend in one weekend at Bird.

Some of my most fun time spent in this city has been the times I've spent little to no money at all.

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 11:57 AM

Heather - I lived on Wayne Street - near Dixon Mills
I LOVED my old Apartment - was huge and on such a pretty street! Where did you live?

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 11:58 AM

Brownie...
Seriously, this is America. The land of puritan work ethics and "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" -- there is a deep-seated hatred and distrust for old money (even if that's just your parents' money)

And I completely disagree with other comments above... I actually DO think there's something wrong with parents supplementing a kid's income after college-age (and I mean undergrad). I didn't even have that help, but to still have hundreds of dollars (maybe even thousands) given to you by your parents at 23, 25 or 30. That's farking ridiculous. I think.

You can go to war at 17, and drink at 21... you should be able to pay your own rent at 24.


Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 12:06 PM

"That term implicitly implies that money is transferred from one generation to the next. "

Parental help doesn't bother me - heck my parents still buy me toilet paper from costco ;)

It bothers me that these parents obviously have good intentions by doing this, taking care of their kid's housing so they can save money for the future in a city where it is very hard to save.

And instead (i say this from first hand experience) they end up buying expensive clothes, vacations and drugs - which isn't what I think their parents had in mind when freeing up some income for their children with their own hard earned money.

How is a young adult supposed to learn to budget and be a responsible adult when you have taken away their biggest expense?

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 12:06 PM

We were on Steuben, which is a really tiny street between Columbus and Morgan down by Harborside. I loved it when we first moved in, but then they started pile-driving a 30-story luxury tower across the street and half the houses on our block were condemned and ours would sway like a ship in the wind... and it made me worry.

I still sort of like Jersey City, but moving back to Brooklyn made me feel a little like a fresh air child or something -- like suddenly there were so many options! So many places to go! Beer at delis! Pharmacies open on Sunday! Etc.

Dixon Mills is gorgeous, I always wondered what it would be like to live over there :)

Posted by: Heather at August 12, 2009 12:06 PM

"Some of my most fun time spent in this city has been the times I've spent little to no money at all."

Definitely - it's what sets this city apart. There are countless free shows, concerts, parks, museums, not to mention cheap (but still good!) food. You really don't need to spend a whole lot to get by, and pretty well at that, beyond housing costs.

Posted by: bjw2103 at August 12, 2009 12:10 PM

I moved from brownstone bk to Williamsburg (DH, we're neighbors) and my thought is, dammit, why must these buildings all have tacky names and finishes? They'd be even cheaper if they didn't, and they'd sell much better. Plenty of creative professionals of middle income would love to buy in the neighborhood if there was anything remotely acceptable to buy.

A normal, contextually appropriate brick condo building in Williamsburg with no name, just an address, no 18-foot lobby--that's something I might consider buying into. Or a tasteful modern building of residential scale or even better, how about CONVERSIONS of all of those factories that were torn down? The building at Driggs and Grand was beautiful, and now it's going to be a 25-story middle finger to out middle-finger the middle finger.

The Evry on Manhattan near Ainslie, to name one, isn't half bad. But then I saw the listings. Must they all be duplexes with bathrooms that look straight out of Minority Report?

Some of these also have Domino-circa-2006 black chandeliers and neo-romantic wallpaper in their 20-foot-high lobbies. Also, why are grey and mauve metallic brick so trendy among these developers? Anyone? Bueller?

It's not just the market--it's developers' garish bad taste and pandering to a no-longer-relevant sense of entitlement. That's why I'd have condo shame were I even considering one, and that's why I duck my head every time I visit my friend who lives in the (not actually all that bad) Loftology in Greenpoint, in mortal fear that someone I know will be eating at Enid's.

Posted by: babygreene at August 12, 2009 12:11 PM

Great Observer story, love all the comments about the supposed meaning of this architectural style or that and what it means to live there, but what I really don't get is this idea that these condos are cheap. True, on square footage basis, condos in Williamsburg are slightly less expensive than property in other "prime" areas. (Or at least it used to be -- they used to be $500 a square foot -- I don't know what they are now.) But the absolute prices -- $500,000 etc. -- are insanely expensive for a one bedroom for one person. Outrageous! These people pining away for a brownstone could just buy a pre-war starter apt. I don't understand this at all. They secretly must like their hideous 600 feet of drywall and fancy fridge, as Heather so aptly described it.

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 12:11 PM

leaving should read living. lo sciento.

Posted by: quetal at August 12, 2009 12:13 PM

Heather - ok that sounds scary about your house. While I don't know the street you lived on, I can recall that area well - sooo pretty over there. I loved that little park right on the water.
I do miss JC sometimes

I completely agree with DH post at 12:06. I too have first hand experience with friends who get money each month from their parents and then would go out wildly spending on clothes and nights out. I think we are setting up a generation that won't be savers because the Parental Fountain will be turned on forever.

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 12:14 PM

Well, anyway, at least we know who's buying these condos now. I always thought it was parents of NYU students. NYT claims it's French families, but since most of the apartments are studios and one bedrooms, it seems unlikely.

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 12:17 PM

"And instead (i say this from first hand experience) they end up buying expensive clothes, vacations and drugs - which isn't what I think their parents had in mind when freeing up some income for their children with their own hard earned money."


But this has more to do with bad parenting than it does anything else, don't you think? The parents did their kids wrong by not instilling a work ethic or value of the dollar in their kids. You can't really blame that on the children, can you?

There are people out there though who have money and HAVE taught their kids these things. I always find it interesting when I meet someone and get to know them and then find out much later that their parents are loaded and you would never guess from the way the kids act or live their lives. It's a great trait.

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 12:21 PM

Saving money seems to be all about the rent-income equation. If you earn $50,000 a year, you *have* to spend $800/month or less on housing to save. (For example.)

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 12:26 PM

11217 - read my 11:50am post above

I agree it's also about bad parenting. But at 25 you should know right from wrong

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 12:29 PM


Yeah, it's absolutely bad parenting... AND you can blame the kids. They are 24, 28, 35... whatever and take NO effort to reflect on themselves critically. Is it their parents fault? Sure. But who's responsibility is it now?

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 12:30 PM

I agree completely Ty and Gem.

Both parents and kids are to blame here, but it's a shame that so many kids these days have been brought up this way. I oftentimes feel as though I'm in the minority among my age group of someone who lives within my means, saves, has a job I love and managed to buy a small place (although could have bought a larger one had I asked my parents for help).

Too many kids are entitled and feel that a small space is below them or what not. We hear it here in some of the older commenters as well. Living here takes some compromise on all but those making over 500K a year. Some kids have not grasped that fact and probably never will. But what can you do?

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 12:36 PM

And as for who lives in Williamsburg -- it used to be the newcomers were mostly artists, then around 2003 it was musicians and creative directors (money), then the regular people with office jobs, first-year-law whatevers started moving in (2005). Then the wanna-be actors followed (2007). It's just like the East Village ten years ago. Whatever!

I don't know who lives in the new-construction high rises. I've always wondered. The ones on MacCarren Park never seemed particularly appealing -- or convenient, since they're on the G train.

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 12:37 PM

quote:
Isn't there a chance that most of us would probably like the investment banker who elects to live in Williamsburg better than her colleague who lives in Murray Hill?


no.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 12:39 PM

Sixyears, mommy and daddy would NEVER let Tiffany live in a walkup. They're dangerous!

Anyone read Candace Bushnell's "One Fifth"? The main character is a 22-year-old with no job who is sure she's going to be famous and whose midwestern parents pay for her $5,000-a-month stunning West Village apartment. Then Lehman and the crash hits. Great book!

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 12:41 PM

quote:
I still sort of like Jersey City, but moving back to Brooklyn made me feel a little like a fresh air child or something -- like suddenly there were so many options! So many places to go! Beer at delis! Pharmacies open on Sunday! Etc.


omfg heather hilarious. i was born in jersey city, and i completely forgot about the whole no selling 40s in delis. so for that reason alone i dont think it would even be POSSIBLE for me to live a quality life in new jersey. i can just see myself having moved there then finding that out like a ton of bricks raining down on me.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 12:43 PM

Seriously, rob?

Posted by: Park Sloper at August 12, 2009 12:44 PM

"The ones on MacCarren Park never seemed particularly appealing -- or convenient, since they're on the G train."

Mopar, isn't McCarren just several short blocks from the Bedford Ave and Metropolitan-Lorimer L stops?

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 12:44 PM

Jersey City sucks its like an industrial wasteland, I dont know why anybody would live there

Posted by: brickoven at August 12, 2009 12:47 PM

Candace Bushnell? gack. isnt the the harry potter who ruined nyc?

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 12:49 PM

Quetal, got any money-saving tips? I did the taco truck plus salad at home for a while -- $3 dinners. But sometimes you gotta socialize, and there is no place in Manhattan where you can sit down, get a glass of wine, a main course, and a green vegetable for less than $25. Of course, if you lived in a Manhattan rent controlled apt, you could do all your cooking and socializing at home. Maybe in Bushwick too, and the groceries there are cheap.

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 12:50 PM

yes park sloper. i would get along much better with a finance type who chooses to live in murray hill over one who chooses to "slum it" in williamsburg. ones a phoney and one aint!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 12:55 PM

"ones a phoney and one aint!"

Yeah, but one's a dbag all the time, and the other is at least ashamed to be one.

Posted by: bjw2103 at August 12, 2009 12:57 PM

quote:
Jersey City sucks its like an industrial wasteland, I dont know why anybody would live there


dont you be hating on chilltown!!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 12:58 PM

quote:
Yeah, but one's a dbag all the time, and the other is at least ashamed to be one.


wburg is the capital of dbagville though!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 12:59 PM

babygreene - What the hell are you talking about? As a condo owner I know most people in my building and many other people who own condos through either friends, or i met them because are kids are some program/class/playing together. You are speaking gibberish. Nice, new apts are awesome. And we are happy!

Some here seem so jealous that people have decent jobs and money to buy a place. i say this because many of you insist that the finishes/quality of condos are universally crap. UM, no. I have 9 1/2 foot ceilings, and my place is gorgeous (well, part of that is our decorating). My friends' brand new place in another building has top of the line appliances, amazing floors, lofted ceiling, wonderful light. it's simply terrific.

A pre-war coop is not comparable to a condo. Coops are not for everyone. I wouldn't last 2 seconds having to kiss ass to some board. Also, not everybody likes pre-war. Many times it also means EXTRA money for renovations. Time and money are not in everyone's orbit.

Mopar - no one who lives on mccarren would take the G unless up to LIC, to transfer to the 7,E or V. the L is close. the blocks are pretty short.

also, many working young adults all over America get a little help with down payments from their parents. When they were in their 20's, my banker brother and banker sister-in-law got down payment help from my Dad for their first house. Does this make them hipsters? Considering they have always lived in the suburbs, I don't think so!
this isn't some Wburg exclusive thing. Sure it's the case all over NYC as all real estate here is so expensive.

Posted by: wine lover at August 12, 2009 1:00 PM

rob, are you sure? Have you ever heard of this "Meatpacking District" or "Murray Hill" or "The Lower East Side"?

Posted by: bjw2103 at August 12, 2009 1:02 PM

I'm gunna have to agree with Rob on this one.

Part of the reason I don't like Williamsburg all that much (besides for the lack of trees, lack of a real park, a lack of sense of community) is because many of the people I know who lived or live there do so because they think it's cool, not because they actually like it. Obviously there are exceptions...I'm just giving a personal anecdote.

In fact, most seem to actually hate it, but seem to think that they are "hip" because they live there. Believe me...I know it's not the coolest thing in the world to be an early 30's gay guy in Park Slope, but I love it, feel most at home here and I didn't want to fight it.

I think a lot of people in Williamsburg are fighting it.

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 1:02 PM

Wine lover makes me hate Williamsburg so much, it's not even funny.

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 1:04 PM

"As we all know, even choosing to live in Brooklyn rather than Manhattan is a major statement in NYC."

MAJOR STATEMENT: Manhattan is too friggin' expensive for me.

Posted by: Sparafucile at August 12, 2009 1:07 PM

quote:
I have 9 1/2 foot ceilings

LOL is that really something to brag about? do you brag about your peepee size too? something tells me you do

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 1:08 PM

"lack of a real park"

11217, that would describe almost everywhere in NYC, and McCarren Park is bigger than a lot of others.

Wine lover, are you incapable of responding to my question at 10:34?

Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at August 12, 2009 1:08 PM

11217, really, you don't like Williamsburg? Seriously though, I'm with you on the lack of trees, but you're dead wrong about the park and sense of community. McCarren is not Central or Prospect, but it's a pretty great park, and I assure you it's real. When they finish the waterfront stuff (beyond the park that's already there, which is also not merely a figment of anyone's imagination), we'll have something only a few neighborhoods have in this city - a great riverside park. I also don't know how you can gauge "sense of community" as an outsider, but I'd like to hear why you think this. I think a lot of the younger college-age kids attach some kind of "coolness" to living here, but the vast majority of adults I know here are way past that. I don't know too many who stick around if they hate it either.

Posted by: bjw2103 at August 12, 2009 1:10 PM

quote:
I know it's not the coolest thing in the world to be an early 30's gay guy in Park Slope, but I love it, feel most at home here and I didn't want to fight it.


me too! which is find incredibly strange hahaha. people in williamsburg seem to sneer at people too much ive noticed. it's creepy and rude.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 1:12 PM

bjw2103, hilarious.

Wine Lover, are you crazy? The condos by Enid's are on the G and it's a loooong walk (especially in the winter) through McCarren Park to get there from the L.

Rob, Candace Bushnell's original Sex & The City book (QUITE different from the TV show -- for one thing, it's non-fiction) was good, as is her most recent book "One Fifth." Everything blows. Though I think we've established the ruination of NYC is her fault, along with Marc Jacobs and Sarah Jessica Parker (who is a sweetie pie).

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 1:12 PM

I mean, everything *else* blows.

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 1:19 PM

I've been trying to love it, Bjw2103. Really I have. And I've spent a lot more time there this summer than in the past and have had fun, but I feel as though Williamsburg has become the embodiment of what I dislike about Manhattan...it feels like the "neighborhood" is there for the sole purpose of raping people of money. It's all about how you look, how trendy the newest restaurant is, how much coke you can do off the bartenders ass at Royal Croak. I just find it so fake. But I think that's why a certain subset of people enjoy it so much.

And yes, this is my perception and I realize lots of people like it. I also realize that some people find the strollers on 7th avenue to be nauseating.

Most of my friends have either moved out of Williamsburg at this point or are in the process of looking to move away (some admittedly because it's too expensive for them now). 3 friends moved out just on August 1st. All to Prospect Heights, but in 3 different apartments. I know, random.

In any event, I don't feel the sense of community you speak of, but I feel a sense that the older generation doesn't much care for the new and the new don't even look at the old.

As an outsider, you are correct that perhaps I haven't been able to experience this, but when people come visit me in Park Slope, one of the very first things they say is how much of a sense of community they feel.

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 1:27 PM

oooh fun reading.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 1:30 PM

The condos on bayard are a 7 minute walk from the lorimer L - and the ones near Enids are an 11 minute walk.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 1:38 PM

"how much coke you can do off the bartenders ass at Royal Croak."

Hilarious - and true.


I know you've been all over the place 11217 - so I won't give you the lecture - but too many people come to visit the burg and judge the entire neighborhood based on a visit to Union Pool and Royal Oak on a Sat night.

Can't judge sense of community if you're a weekend warrior, as most people out and about don't even live in the community.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 1:40 PM

You know I'm partially trying to be funny, DH.

I don't go to Royal Oak (after that one and only time) nor to Union Pool, and I think I've found some places that I do enjoy there.

I agree with you though. I'm sure there's a lot more to it than meets the eye. That's the beauty of NYC. It's fun to talk about though.

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 1:44 PM

dipster, what place was it that i told you i got dragged to a few saturday nights ago? gack. i thought i died and was in hell!! hahahha.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 1:44 PM

11217, I totally get why people don't like the neighborhood - it's by no means the prettiest, draws a bit of a dbag nightlife crowd on weekends, is not super-convenient to midtown, etc. I do disagree when you say that it feels like it's there for the sole purpose of "raping people of money." Are prices really that much higher than in Park Slope for everything? Why do you care about the fashion shows, the trendiness factor in restaurants, etc.? Only insecure people worry about that stuff, even if it is going on around them. I laugh at these things and move on, because behind them there's actually a lot to love in the neighborhood. I say this while loving a whole lot of other neighborhoods as well (Prospect Heights and Park Slope included).

As for the old timers vs new, you're right, but I feel the disdain is more towards those who come to the neighborhood to drink and frolic in McCarren, while showing little respect for their surroundings. Actual residents are naturally more understanding and respectful.

Posted by: bjw2103 at August 12, 2009 1:44 PM

"dipster, what place was it that i told you i got dragged to a few saturday nights ago? gack. i thought i died and was in hell!! hahahha. "

You were at Union Pool Rob. Hell on earth on a Saturday night.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 1:48 PM

This thread rules.

I've always liked W'burg, everytime I'm there I marvel how I could totally live there. I guess being older and happy about it, the young people haivng their young people moments just amuse me rather than infuriate me. So many baby faces in W'burg!

These condos are for people who stay home all the time, watchign TV, playing with kids, or surfing online. I can't imagine a 23 year old who prefers to say in at home rather than enjoy life in New York. New York is outward-directed - the ONLY consideration for many people is keeping housing costs low so we can buy lunch/entertain ourselves/etc.

Posted by: infinitejester at August 12, 2009 1:51 PM

Bjw,

I feel you. I'm sure I don't know as much about it as I claim. :)

But as for the raping of money comment...Park Slope has been expensive for a while. It came into its own more organically, as many of the brownstone neighborhoods did. They developed. It also has historic homes which were built by skilled artisans over a 100 years ago. They should be more expensive than those built of drywall, don't you think?

Williamsburg has been essentially built from the ground up in the past decade (or a little more) with regard to the condos, shops, restaurants, etc. Much of that stuff which has opened caters only to the new arrivals and not at all to those who have lived there and have a median income of 25K.

But that's true all over, I suppose.

We don't need to argue about it though. I'm really just trying to have a conversation, and I know I'm coming across more judgy than I mean to.

To each his/her own, right?

Thank god we all don't like Williamsburg. And thank god we all don't like Park Slope. World would be pretty boring....

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 1:53 PM

hey dh, this is the bar I was asking you about, the East River Bar,

http://eastriverbar.com/images/East-River0011.jpg

Posted by: infinitejester at August 12, 2009 1:56 PM

11217, ive noticed youve considerably toned down your nasty catty remarks since that random lurker called you out on it yesterday. please go back into bi+ch-mode. it's much more entertaining!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 2:03 PM

Interesting jester - I've heard of it but I've never been. Looks cool.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 2:04 PM

I'm sure bitch mode will be back, Rob. Don't you worry. Just tell wine lover or Muffy to post some more. :)

I guess the Italian in me has a hot temper, but deep down I'm a bunny.

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 2:06 PM

11217, no worries. You're spot on in that last post. Unfortunately, developers almost never cater to lower incomes; the system in place gives them little incentive to. And you're right, the changes in Williamsburg have come about much faster than in Park Slope, but for one, I'm looking forward to things slowing down and a more "organic" growth taking shape as we struggle with this economy.

The brownstone vs poorly built condo argument I get, but I think this meme gets WAY out of whack sometimes - not every new building is just "drywall." It takes a little research to properly discern, and I can't tell you the number of times people just glance at the exterior and pass judgment on the quality of construction. It's hilarious.

For the record, I don't find you to be judgy - I think it's great you have your convictions and are willing to share them here. I'm enjoying this thread much more than our discussion on inventory, I must say!

Posted by: bjw2103 at August 12, 2009 2:07 PM

Another problem with williamsburg is that it is the epicenter for manchild anorexia malady that is plauging much of the city. im not sure how restaurants stay in business. tho i guess they survive because most of the girls in williamsburg are on the pasty-pudgey side.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 2:09 PM

well that was exhausting.

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 2:10 PM

"I'm enjoying this thread much more than our discussion on inventory, I must say!"


HA! Agreed!

I'm glad we've found some common ground as well. I enjoy hearing your views on this thread, and apologize for being such an arse the other day.

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 2:12 PM

My cousin is one of the aforementioned parents who 'spoils' their children, by, in part, paying their rent after they graduated from school. I asked him why he did that when his own parents didnt do that for him. His response was simply that he worked hard in order to be in the position to live a comfortable lifestyle and be able to afford to support his children well, otherwise making the money would be meaningless to him. I asked him whether he thought he was spoiling his kids, and he didnt see it that way - he felt he was giving his kid yet one more opportunity, and he felt that he would have failed if his kid ended up living in a lousy situation (e.g. dirty, small, walk-up building). Time will tell whether the kids grow up with warped values or not, though I see that the father's desire for success was passed down to the kids. I asked him what he would do if he didnt have the money to afford the support, and he said he would do whatever he could to help his kids, plain and simple.

We agreed to disagree. But I think his viewpoint is shared by many in his position - they worked hard so that they could give their kids these things. I would have seen him loan his kids the money, rather than giving it outright, but each to his own.

Posted by: saminthehood at August 12, 2009 2:21 PM

All this talk of coke and Union Pool makes me want to see for myself. I'm supposed to go out drinking tomorrow night in W'burg, I'll steer that way.

Posted by: infinitejester at August 12, 2009 2:22 PM

quote:
he felt that he would have failed if his kid ended up living in a lousy situation (e.g. dirty, small, walk-up building).

your cousin is a moron

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 2:23 PM

11217, you've warmed the cockles of my heart (and I apologize if I got aggressive myself). Which is much more than I can say for the dbag who shamelessly reprints my Brownstoner posts on Streeteasy to try and pick fights over the internet. BTW, I know this isn't the place for it, but as a local, what are your 2-3 fave bars in Park Slope? I feel I need to indulge in the bar scene a bit more over there.

Posted by: bjw2103 at August 12, 2009 2:23 PM

I used to love Williamsburg so much that I gave walking tours whenever anyone I knew visited New York. Even in the early oughts, when we'd moved away I would still come back and show people my favorite things: the cat bar (it was an abandoned bar full of cats); Moishe's bakery; the Abbey; Orient Avenue; Cooper Park; fresh-filled cannolli at Bruno Bakery; seafood pizza at Nina's 2; L-cafe; brunch at Oznots or Teddy's; that little Mexican place on Bedford; Peter Lugar's; Diner; BQE Pet store; Sweetwater; the Right Bank; Top's; Las Palmas; El Maguy y Tuna; the abandoned waterfront; the Downer's Pharmacy sign that the cheese shop idiotically took down... etc. I know I tend to pontificate on this topic a little too much, but I was a huge fangirl.

Even when we moved back in 2006 to a strange new Williamsburg, I was still optimistic -- sure, a lot of the old stuff was gone, but there was some new stuff and some of it didn't suck. I am still a fan of Oslo and Atlas and most of the new italian restaurants. But what got to me was the sheer unrelenting annoyance of pushing a stroller around construction site after construction site, over broken sidewalks and shadeless streets and seeing parts of Williamsburg that had once been vital and whole reduced to rubble and half-finished buildings... and then, on top of that realizing that even if we saved and wanted to invest in the neighborhood, all of the options were pretty horrific and really, really expensive.

I pretty much moved to Fort Greene/Clinton Hill with major doubts and under some duress and I have to say it's the best decision I ever made. Sure, I miss Williamsburg, but the burg I miss isn't the one that's there now. What's there now does have some charms, but the sheer inventory glut of new construction is going to erase most of that, one way or the other.

Posted by: Heather at August 12, 2009 2:25 PM

i thought everyone does heroin now though. (it's only 10 bux a bag!) definitely the one drug i would not touch with a 10 foot pole though. both my biological parents were hooked on that shit and dead now. i hope it doesnt make a come back like people have been claiming it is. conversations with coke and crackheads can be fun, heroin? gack. good luck.


*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 2:26 PM

"BTW, I know this isn't the place for it, but as a local, what are your 2-3 fave bars in Park Slope?"


The places I enjoy are, in no particular order:

Commonwealth
High Dive
Sharlene's (really Prospect Hgts but right over the border)

None of these places are particularly destinations, but if you happen to be in the 'hood and want a drink with friends, they are nice, laid back neighborhood joints.

I also really like Franklin Park (although it's more Prospect Heights/Crown Heights). Great beer garden with terrific outdoor space.


Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 2:33 PM

"All this talk of coke and Union Pool makes me want to see for myself. I'm supposed to go out drinking tomorrow night in W'burg, I'll steer that way."

All the actions happens there on Saturday nights - Thursday is mellow (much like everything else)

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 2:36 PM

11217 - I stopped at a place on the southeast corner of 7th ave and 9th street last night after the concert - i forgot what it was called but everyone was very friendly

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 2:38 PM

East River is a cool spot. Its on South 6th, and backs up to the Brige. Nice sized indoor bar, with larger outdoor space. Its pretty low-key, with a good jukebox, and cheap draft beer. Bar staff are friendly, and you don't get the as*hole factor that you find a lot of other W-burg watering holes.

Posted by: quetal at August 12, 2009 2:42 PM

I can't picture, DH. The corner of 7th and 9th has Smiling Pizza on the southeast corner, and Brooklyn Industries on the southwest corner.

Maybe it was on 6th Avenue and 9th Street...Barbes?

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 2:49 PM

Ohh.... the croissants at the bakery on the corner next to Barbes are delicious!

Posted by: tybur6 at August 12, 2009 3:00 PM

does everyone really do drugs? that sucks
Rob - you are tooo funny with the girls being pasty/pudgy. I often see plenty of Willy-B girls who are 1 dimensional looking

Heather - Oznots had the BEST brunch. Ever try their walnut date cake with the whiskey sauce?

11217 - oh lord Commonwealth - that's the spot my 22 year old cousin goes to regularly! - haha

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 3:00 PM

Southwest corner of 7th and 9th has that burger bar place...always people there so must be good.

Posted by: infinitejester at August 12, 2009 3:01 PM

IJ: eeks that place was shut down TWICE for health code violations before it became this current iteration of a burger bar
I kinda am afraid to try it

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 3:03 PM

Really? Wow. Never been there, but had been on my list.

Sharlene's - it seems like the lights are always on/bright inside, so you could read. That is cool if so...I can usually only read in a bar if there's a patio.

Posted by: infinitejester at August 12, 2009 3:17 PM

11217 whats the name of that either Turkish or moroccan place with the cool out dor area?

Posted by: brickoven at August 12, 2009 3:21 PM

Arg, heroin. I don't think it ever really went away. Didn't realize it was only the cost of two Starbuck's.

Hey more posts here than in the OT! Sadly I have to go to a conference now. :(

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 3:22 PM

I smoked an opium pipe in Thailand once. Arrrrghhhh.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at August 12, 2009 3:24 PM

Speaking of drugs, the NBC network news at 6:30 tonight is going to interview the couple who was on the album cover...

http://www.vinylrecords.ch/W/WO/Woodstock1_DE/woodstock-20.jpg

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at August 12, 2009 3:27 PM

I must be such a nerd
worst drug I tried and I don;t even consider it a drug really was weed
opium sounds scary!

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 3:28 PM

Brickoven:

Do you mean Olive Vine?

The one on 7th at Lincoln has a really nice outdoor space...

Posted by: 11217 at August 12, 2009 3:29 PM

opium is by far the best drug I never tried :)

Posted by: brickoven at August 12, 2009 3:30 PM

11217:
see my answer over at the HOTD?

Posted by: gemini10 at August 12, 2009 3:43 PM

gem i don't do drugs either

wouldn't mind having a coke whore on speed dial tho

Posted by: infinitejester at August 12, 2009 3:50 PM

Dave, did you like it?

Posted by: mopar at August 12, 2009 4:10 PM

Special K is the worst

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 4:11 PM

"worst drug I tried and I don;t even consider it a drug really was weed"

Weed isn't a drug. It's less dangerous than alcohol

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 4:17 PM

It was rather sickening, mopar. I guess it's an acquired addiction!!!

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at August 12, 2009 4:17 PM

Haven't done anything since about 1985 or so!!!

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at August 12, 2009 4:24 PM

What a shocker - a news story about Williamsburg has devolved into a discussion of hardcore drug use. Bravo BrownSTONERS!

Posted by: dirty_hipster at August 12, 2009 4:29 PM

"Southwest corner of 7th and 9th has that burger bar place...always people there so must be good."

I liked the Tex-Mex place that used to be there. They had good chicken-fried chicken.

Posted by: Sparafucile at August 12, 2009 4:46 PM

Special k is the BESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSST!

ironically the first time i did it me and my friend thought we were cats. then one of our roommates, pissy because we didnt share with him, decided it was the perfect time to vacuum and kept threatening to suck us up in the hose!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at August 12, 2009 5:06 PM

pitbull
did the roomate threaten to suck you into the k hole. :)

Posted by: brickoven at August 12, 2009 5:12 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions