« Brownstoner on Twitter Open House Picks »

June 12, 2009

Open House Picks: Six Months Later

OHP-6months-121208.jpg
Comment: Tough times at the higher end.
Open House Picks 12/12/09 [Brownstoner]
Previous Six Months Later Posts [Brownstoner]




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/10139

Comments

In re Park Place: Despite the drop from initial ask, that is still a pretty hefty price for a house in that location.

Posted by: wasder at June 12, 2009 12:57 PM

http://www.cnbc.com/id/30964377/

same thing I posted in the other thread. jumbo mtg foreclosure crisis coming, according to some CNBC person who did a half-day of research on it.

I don't believe it for this area. too much wealth supporting prices still, too few people who overextended on brownstones. wall st has stablized and people are quietly starting to make some money again.

by now most of the fat has been scraped off the brooklyn housing market. I think sellers see enough of the light of the day now that they can hunker down and ride this thing out.

Posted by: joe_the_bummer at June 12, 2009 1:01 PM

Joe, I respectfully disagree. I have friends who are selling and breaking down, cutting prices, and accepting much lower offers than planned (we're talking 20%+ less than last year) since they see it will only continue to get much worse. As inventory continues to rise, economy at best stagnates in NYC (if not continues to deteriorate), and interest rates creep up, downward pressure will grow with no quick end in sight.

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 1:06 PM

Park Place needed work
Costs of reno may be high
Who saw the inside?

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 1:12 PM

Hello Miss Muffet
If your friends are selling cheap,
Why not buy their house?

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 1:15 PM

Looks like the less well known [and less expensive]neighborhoods might be selling better than the more established ones. This is contrary tomost predictions at the start of the bust.

Posted by: Bob Marvin at June 12, 2009 1:28 PM

"I don't believe it for this area. too much wealth supporting prices still, too few people who overextended on brownstones."

You forgot about people that Refied or refried. Now they can't Refi ROTFLMMFAO!

New York City's future ghost towers
May 27, 2009 06:19PM
By Sarah Ryley

You remember Sarah Ryley right? She was a writer on Brownstoner a few years back and I wonder why Jon did not post this story.

http://therealdeal.com/newyork/articles/new-york-city-s-future-ghost-towers

and download the PDF on this story it's fucking scary!!!!

http://s3.amazonaws.com/trd_three/images/89480/ghost_towers.pdf

This Fall is going to be fun. Buh Bye Retards..

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...

Posted by: Return of The What at June 12, 2009 1:28 PM

BG -- I think you missed her point. she expects further declines. why would she buy now? RE prices move downward at a glacial pace. After costs, if you buy a house and sell it again, with anything less than a 2-3% annual return, you underperform renting. if you can, you want to wait til you see the bottom.

Muff I am in bull costume to see how it feels (answer: like rooting for the evil empire in star wars). Question - would you classify your friends as panic sellers, market-timers, just broke, or people who have some life issues (kids, move) forcing them to move? My line of Bull is that there are not that many b-stone owners who are just unable to make the payment, as the article would imply.

Posted by: joe_the_bummer at June 12, 2009 1:29 PM

did a lot of people refi to take out cash or renovate? I mean the dowdy brooklyn heights crowd.

Posted by: joe_the_bummer at June 12, 2009 1:33 PM

"did a lot of people refi to take out cash or renovate? I mean the dowdy brooklyn heights crowd."

Oh yeah! The future Donald Trumps of the world!

Please read- New York City's future ghost towers. If you own a Condo, you should be shitting in your pants now!

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...

Posted by: Return of The What at June 12, 2009 1:40 PM

Joe;

Just one data point to support your theory: New York State has the lowest percentage of households that are "underwater" on their mortgage.

From the vanatage point of the 46 unit PS condo in which I live, I would say that folks are holding tight, as you stated. There have been three units for sale in my condo (all can be seen on BHS' web-site) and they are all holding out, i.e. no panic selling. One of them has been on the market for over a year.

As I've stated before, I had expected that my downstairs neighbor would slash their price. The husband had lost his position and they were thinking of moving to Washington DC for better opportunities. However, he found another position in NYC. It pays less, but they have enough wealth to wait it out, at least for now.

Posted by: benson at June 12, 2009 1:44 PM

Fanny found a friend
She waited for the bottom
Now it's in the can

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 1:47 PM

BrooklynGreene;

I like you new schtick as the haiku poet laureate of Brownstoner.

I've found my own schtick: on Friday mornings I run a NYC/Brooklyn trivia quiz on the OT. Check it out!

Posted by: benson at June 12, 2009 1:52 PM

Joe - for my specific friends, there are life issues that are an influence in their decision to sell (and cut price/accept lower offer), but not an imperative. They could stay but they are seeing they're better off getting out sooner rather than later. As my own experience attests, RE decisions can be part of a complex stew. We did not *need* to sell when we did, but given all the other factors at the time, plus the desire to be in a different school zone, it seemed wise to sell and cash out before prices went down (which I had thought for a long time was inevitable).

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 1:55 PM

MM...are you saying they are looking to sell now (sooner rather than later) because they are afraid of further falls in the equity of their home? With transaction costs what they are in NYC that's a pretty ridiculous decision.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 12, 2009 1:58 PM

I've read Brooklyn Greene's posts with admiration for some time now, and the switch to haiku makes her posts even more interesting. if we bumped into each other in real life Brooklyn Greene, we would like each other, because I can tell we have lived parallel lives in many respects.

And btw, BG, I share your impatience with Miss Muppet.

Posted by: dylanfan at June 12, 2009 2:07 PM

What I mean is, if you see you might want to sell eventually (for cash as a financial cushion, for downsizing, for school, for trading up and renting in meantime, for those considering a move, whatever), the current RE market is a tipping point in the decision-making. My friends, and my own situation, was like this so we sold, and now friends are selling, even for a lot less than they would have gotten a year ago (but likely a lot more than they'd get next year). OK, back to work - no more time to post for now!

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 2:07 PM

Oh and--

Brooklyn Greene, if you don't know about it already, the first OH at 49 South Portland on May 31 was mobbed and by the end of the day they had three people fighting over the place at 2.2MM, and it was going to a "best and final offer" thing.

Put those tired feet up and enjoy a smile.

Posted by: dylanfan at June 12, 2009 2:12 PM

could mkt stabilize or even go up? yes it can. But until you SEE it, default assumption should be drip drip drip....

doesn't feel like much as each drip occurs but after a while, the drips yield a big drop

the whole mkt doesn't need to tank. just need find a few owners who HAVE to sell NOW.

The NEED to sell is more a reality than the NEED to buy (cause there's always the short term solution to rent)

Posted by: more4less at June 12, 2009 2:17 PM

fairly certain i know the buyers of park place. they plan a near-gut, but i have no idea how much of that is by choice vs. by necessity of condition.

Posted by: i disagree at June 12, 2009 2:30 PM

These dogs are flaggin'
Relief that somethin's sellin'
I'll have an iced tea

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 2:31 PM

My gut, it's a gut
The yard is deep, facade white
Kitchens number five

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 2:40 PM

it's fascinating how many people on this site make up fictional "friends" to bolster their arguments.

Posted by: z at June 12, 2009 2:42 PM

dylanfan: And btw, BG, I share your impatience with Miss Muppet.

The best line of the day
ROFLMAO

Posted by: sebb at June 12, 2009 2:44 PM

"it's fascinating how many people on this site make up fictional "friends" to bolster their arguments."

it's fascinating how many people on this site make up fictional "Housing Price Valuations" to bolster their arguments.

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...

Posted by: Return of The What at June 12, 2009 2:47 PM

Our friend in RE
Wants us to sell 1-point-3
Assisted living?

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 2:50 PM

Very good What, except Last Weeks Biggest Sales are not fictional. And, they are all "post lehman" my friend.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 12, 2009 2:50 PM

The ongoing price drops in OH 6 months later thread aren't fictional either, and a better "true" snapshot of market.

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 2:52 PM

"Very good What, except Last Weeks Biggest Sales are not fictional. And, they are all "post lehman" my friend.
"

What about volume dumbafuck?! Do you read the Real Deal story yet Dave? Get back to me.

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...

Posted by: Return of The What at June 12, 2009 2:56 PM

clearly, none of us have any friends.

Posted by: joe_the_bummer at June 12, 2009 2:56 PM

hey what the link does't work for me - is there another way to get it? I want to read it.

Posted by: joe_the_bummer at June 12, 2009 2:58 PM

MM, many houses are overpriced, even during the peak of the market. Most of us, yourself included, know the difference between something that's not selling because its wildly overpriced and its an unmotivated seller from things that are coming down in price 15-20% from peak comps due to the economy.

I didn't pay asking price for my ghetto money pit in early 2007 either. :)

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 12, 2009 2:58 PM

Joe I hope this one works and please read the PDF!

http://s3.amazonaws.com/trd_three/images/89480/ghost_towers.pdf


The story!

http://therealdeal.com/newyork/articles/new-york-city-s-future-ghost-towers

New York City's future ghost towers
May 27, 2009 06:19PM
By Sarah Ryley

In many of America's most popular destinations, from the beaches of South Florida to the Las Vegas strip, "ghost towers" — empty or near empty buildings — mark the skyline, mere shells of their developers' failed ambitions.

The perfect storm of plunging property values, frozen credit markets and excess supply in certain real estate submarkets is stalling many newly built projects. That raises the question: Is New York City, late to the real estate downturn that has plagued the rest of the country, due to be haunted, too?

To determine which buildings in New York City are the most likely future ghost towers, The Real Deal turned to sources in the real estate, finance and legal industries who identified 23 residential condo and rental projects as among the most at risk of remaining empty for years to come.

These towers, along with brief synopses of their circumstances, are listed in the accompanying chart.

Most of the projects are stalled and completely uninhabited. Another five are among a group of 180 condominiums citywide that StreetEasy lists as less than 70 percent sold. The 70 percent threshold is a requirement Fannie Mae put into effect March 1 that subsequently has been adopted by most lenders as a criterion before they will approve mortgage loans in a particular building. The high benchmark, up from the previous standard of 51 percent, has made financing many new condo purchases nearly impossible and created a nearly insurmountable obstacle that brokers complain locks a building into a state of being "undersold."

Buyers disappear

In all, of the more than 18,115 new apartments that have come to market in recent years, roughly 55 percent have been sold, according to StreetEasy. That figure doesn't include the thousands of units that will be released in the next few years or buildings that have been turned into rentals.

For those apartments to be filled with buyers, the credit market needs to open up. Until then, many developers could turn to rentals, which are not dependent on the availability of mortgages.

The city's mounting job losses also need to be reversed, said Jim Brown, a state Department of Labor analyst.

Between March 2008 and March 2009, Brown said, the five boroughs lost 86,400 jobs at a rate that has been "widening pretty steadily."

"Finance and insurance [job loss] counts for about a quarter of that. They're off 21,600, which is probably going to have an impact on your above-rent-control condos and co-ops," he said.

From 2003 until well into last summer, when all these new apartments were envisioned, the city was seeing gains in jobs, said Brown.

Now, he said, a turnaround in job losses isn't expected until at least 2010, assuming there's a national economic recovery later this year.

Prices plummet

Some buildings, meanwhile, are not fully finished. "If the project needs another 10 percent of funds to be completed, a lot of these projects that have come to a halt are going to be sitting there, some for several years, before they're actually completed," said J.D. Parker, a regional manager for Marcus & Millichap.

Parker briefly marketed Greenpoint's 130-unit Viridian at the discounted price of $65 million — or $500,000 per unit — until the project was pulled after the owners filed for bankruptcy. That also left at least seven renters who had signed leases there, expecting the building to be finished in one month, suddenly looking for a new home.

"Right now I'm working on 10 to 15 projects of a similar nature, predominantly in Brooklyn and Queens," said Parker, who declined to name the projects. "All of them are empty because most of them are only half-built, three-quarters built, and they're stalled."

In addition, the price point at which banks and developers need to sell or rent to break even on their buildings is above current market rates, causing a standoff between them and investors looking to take over these projects.

"There remains a significant disconnect between the bid and the ask, particularly with regards to development sites with land values off 50 to 75 percent from their peak, in many locations," said David Schechtman, a senior director for Eastern Consolidated.

"That is a tremendous pill for a lender to swallow," he added.

Until the pricing standoff is resolved, towers here will remain empty, as in other parts of the country, predicted Peter Zalewski, founder of CondoVultures.com, a market intelligence service that connects investors with distressed projects in Miami, San Diego and Las Vegas.

For example, based on a review of public records, Swig Equities' the Exchange at 25 Broad, a condominium conversion that was swept up in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, would need to sell at near $1,000 per square foot simply to break even.

"[Investors] would expect to buy residential conversion buildings a heck of a lot closer to $300 or $400 a foot, and that's for buildings that are fairly far along like 25 Broad," said Schechtman.

Rather than sell the debt, Lehman is proceeding in its effort to foreclose on the property. Swig declined to comment on the matter. Meanwhile, the last remaining 10 contract holders are living in the 346-unit building on interim leases. Patricia Bransford, who moved there in November 2007 expecting to eventually close on the apartment, said she doesn't mind living in an empty building because there's never a wait for a treadmill in the gym.

Still, she doesn't enjoy being searched by a K-9 unit every time she's dropped off at the door, since 25 Broad is on a post-Sept. 11 heightened-security block. "I'm not sure I would close on a unit in New York City now because prices are going down," she said.

Incomplete buildings

New investors are unwilling to give more money to buildings that are already over-leveraged before they've even been completed.

"I get calls literally every day, sometimes

multiple times a day, from guys

Posted by: Return of The What at June 12, 2009 3:02 PM

Fie, Fie Open House
I saw this cute bag today
It was not for sale

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 3:02 PM

Ow Ow My Ass
Massive hurt from I-Beam
Blood leaking from my Anus

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...

Posted by: Return of The What at June 12, 2009 3:07 PM

Ew

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 3:10 PM

Thank you sebb, but I think joe the bummer trumped me with:

----clearly, none of us have any friends.

That made me laugh our loud. I think biff and north slope renter should be writing for Letterman or someone like that and making millions.

BG: 1.3? How long do you think that will keep you in assisted living? Your"friend" in real estate is looking to make a quick sale.

Posted by: dylanfan at June 12, 2009 3:14 PM

What's cut and paste has an odd ending - the last line of his email is the following statement, seemingly disconnected from the rest of his post:

"multiple times a day, from guys"

Posted by: lechacal at June 12, 2009 3:15 PM

Houses are moving in the hoods because buyers sheepishly think there's value there (no downside) and because of FHA loans.

Nice 'devil's advocate' joe the bummer. Muffy 'left her feet'.

Guys/gals - There is no accurate information on distress besides pre-foreclusure data (I'm still waiting for someone to post the trend since peak). And New York State is very big, Benson (exactly what percentage of those above the water surface is attributed to NYC?). So due to depressionary conditions, you have to assume it's widespread. Those that aren't panic-selling are holding out only because they're falling for the hype of a 'V'-recovery. It aint happenin'. It'll look like an 'L' for some time. The day, month or year that they realize that, panic selling (capitulation) will ensue. Not necessarily because of distress but also as a growing opportunity cost (once in a lifetime boom/bust). By the time we see recent peak prices again, it won't matter for people who are trying to hold on.

Get it while it's hot opportunistic owners! (Not applicable for owners that love their home enough not to 'sell-out' and are far from distress - 25% of them or less.)

***Bid half off peak comps***

Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at June 12, 2009 3:17 PM

"I get calls literally every day, sometimes

multiple times a day, from guys

Posted by: Return of The What at June 12, 2009 3:02 PM

ROTFLMMFAO...texting is easier, What.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 12, 2009 3:18 PM

BHO, MM and all;

You keep speaking about the economy, but may I remind you again that there is the spector of inflation. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon that is not necessarily coupled to the economy. Old decreptitudants like myself remember the 70's when we had a lousy economy, a lousy stock market AND high inflation. Hence the term "stagflation" was coined.

If indeed inflation does come roaring back, those who can hold onto their house, expecially if they are leveraged,will be looking mighty smart.

With helicopter Ben Bernanke printing out the dollar bills, inflation is a distinct possibility. From what I read Angela Merkel of Germany is so pissed at our government that she's barely speaking with Obama. She believes that we are taking our eye off the ball with regard to the possibility of inflation.

We'll see what happens, but can you please learn one fundamental fact: a bad economy does not necessarily mean deflation. Indeed, it can often lead to inflation as the dollar bills are printed out.

Posted by: benson at June 12, 2009 3:37 PM

BHO what's happing! Nice day outside!

Hey Retards read my Real Deal post and get back you me.

5 months guys Tick motherfucking tock...

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...

Posted by: Return of The What at June 12, 2009 3:46 PM

Ow Ow My Ass
Massive hurt from I-Beam
Blood leaking from my Anus

What=--a poet and he don't even know it.

Posted by: wasder at June 12, 2009 3:48 PM

So Benson, what's your prediction re: NY RE prices for the next 12 months, 2 years, and 5 years?

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 3:49 PM

The Real Deal piece definitely paints a scary picture of condo ownership in these crazy times.

Posted by: wasder at June 12, 2009 3:51 PM

They will become rentals because the banks won't lend against the units with so many unsold. Some will become low income housing, as we have seen.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 12, 2009 3:55 PM

So, with rental supply going up, won't rental market continue to soften, thus providing incentive for buyers to hold out further til sellers cave? As someone currently renting, I have no incentive to buy now when even 2-5 years of rent is less than the savings I see in the drops that are happening (since we're in market for a house, where even a 15-20% drop is a lot of $)...

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 3:59 PM

MM...those people in brownstone Brooklyn who are going to cave most likely already have their houses on the market because of some dire necessity to sell. People just don't up and decide to sell because prices are falling. There is precious little supply on the market. Do you think lower prices will draw out more supply? No, just the opposite. These are not vacation homes.

You run the real risk of not finding something to your liking with so little supply on the market.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 12, 2009 4:06 PM

Your reversion to perversion
A shocker every day
My excursion, so ex-urban
Up New England way

Our selling is afelling
But it happens still
Will your stalling have you crawling
Have you made your will?

The grapes fatten
The roses bloom
Not much appears to rhyme with orange
We still have food
This much is good
I leave you to your silence

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 4:08 PM

the day I see a duplex rental pop up in these prime BK hoods for 2700 or lower, then it's uh oh time. for now, don't see rents drop enough to scare sellers yet.

Posted by: more4less at June 12, 2009 4:10 PM

Oh, DIBS, please stop peddling fear. People always need to sell for various reasons.

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 4:17 PM

Oh, DIBS, please stop peddling fear. People always need to sell for various reasons.

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 4:17 PM

DIBS, peddling fear???? I think you got that backwards.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 12, 2009 4:19 PM

Recently, I thought
A line, a stain on the wall
Light entered the room

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 4:33 PM

MM, *you* are the one *trying* to peddle fear because it suits your needs.

I am neither a bull nor a bear. I am an old decreptitudant (thank you Benson for the Word of the Day), so I know that nobody knows what's going to happen. So far in Brooklyn, as far as real estate values are concerned, nothing much is going on either way, despite what your "friends" tell you.

I wish you would find your 750K brownstone (is that too much? should the boomers who snatched these places up for "a pittance" be happy with 500K, since that would leave them a "handsome profit" of maybe 400K?) between 8th and the Park, between President and oh, maybe 3rd St., and go on your way. But I also know that in the unlikely event that your dream becomes a reality, the very next day after your closing you will be on this site screaming, Prices have nowhere to go but up!!!!!!!

Posted by: dylanfan at June 12, 2009 4:34 PM

Yeah, I mean I have been reading this blog for a while and Miss Muff loves fear. It is what makes that price so much better for her. I am in the same place since I want to buy in a few years, but I don't constantly scare people about the end of life and value of property, etc. Who knows what will happen. You now live in a rental while your kids are growing up. That might be fine for you, but I am sure you spend all the time thinking about where you will live and where you can buy and all that stuff. Thinking about how your kitchen is not what you really want or could afford and instead just settling. (Not that renting is bad, but if you are constantly thinking about how its not where you really want to be and are just thinking about prices of brownstones it is.) Just relax. We could have massive inflation because of the US$ printing and you just missed an opportunity. Who knows? Just be happy.

Posted by: LincolnSlope at June 12, 2009 4:35 PM

"MM, many houses are overpriced, even during the peak of the market. "

Uh huh.

Here's the search results page for "six months later":
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=6&search=six+months+later

Here's the oldest entry from that page:
http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2007/12/six_months_late.php

Note that two of the properties sold for over ask. Would you like to guess how many of the later posts show two of the four properties selling for over ask?

Posted by: Smudge at June 12, 2009 4:38 PM

Lincoln Slope, you got it right.

Posted by: dylanfan at June 12, 2009 4:39 PM

Happiness pervades
Fleeting sensation of warmth
Brush on your shoulder

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 4:41 PM

Yes, Smudge, and that would make them even MORE overpriced!!!! LOL

I paid over ask ONCE in my lifetime of purchasing about 15 properties. That was in 1998 in Philadelphia. That house was underpriced at the bottom of the market!!! At closing, Prudential Fox & Roach, who controlled 90% of Phladelphia, said I was the first to pay above ask in many, many years. It was just the beginning. But thats a different story.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 12, 2009 4:43 PM

drip drip drip no need to rip
I aint greedy
10k per month drip is enough

it aint haiku but I wasnt trying to

BKgreene, when can I drop by to check out your pad for that $999k price you mentioned last time? I aint that greedy - 999k low enough for me

Posted by: more4less at June 12, 2009 4:50 PM

Our house on ebay
Or in your grocer's freezer
Steps from everything

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 12, 2009 5:02 PM

me bid $1
then $2
$3
then ask if can rent lower duplex instead

Posted by: more4less at June 12, 2009 5:05 PM

thanks What for the article. good weekend everyone.

Posted by: joe_the_bummer at June 12, 2009 5:22 PM

interesting to see this conversation re:vested interests and predictions. until about a month ago, i was in mm's position, and then decided to jump in. many of my reasons for doing so were personal and not about timing the market - but I got a place that is well within what I could afford, bought mostly for cash, in a bluechip neighborhood (central park slope), that I can hold for an indefinite period of time with no worries.

even so, it's amazing how much a change of situation changes your perspective. I do find myself wanting to cheerlead the market now, much more than before. watching this psychological change in myself and seeing how chaotic and unpredictable the economy is right now just makes me very cautious of any kind of prediction. the one thing that seems crucial to avoid is any attempt to buy a place that is at or near the limit of what you can afford - because with all this unpredicability that seems a recipe for disaster no matter how good the price might seem.

(a sidenote: as a condo-buyer not a brownstone buyer, I observed the opposite trend in the condo market from what some people have mentioned about brownstones - condos in more fringe areas seem to have largely stopped selling, whereas places in more established neighborhoods have fared much better. thoughts on this?)

Posted by: perhaps at June 12, 2009 6:04 PM

I need to be loved
I enjoy anal sex toys
Please marry me Dave

Posted by: ghettoazzpnkbtch at June 12, 2009 7:05 PM

Perhaps - congrats on your purchase. We are actively looking too, and contrary to what some people think, we are not really trying to time the market per se. If we got a good price on a place we loved, within a budget we're comfortable with - we probably would buy, even knowing that the bottom is not yet here. The change in our mentality is that we are a lot more patient now, and the budget range we are comfortable is lower - not because we have less cash/income, but exactly because of the unpredictability you point out.

It's certainly possible we will buy a place and see prices decline further (and no, I won't then suddenly start cheerleading the market since, like wasder, I will know that I've bought a place to keep for life). But it's also possible that we will stay in our nice/economical rental for a long time and just wait to buy again. Either way, we are certain that time is on our side. I agree that no one knows for sure what's going to happen, in terms of how low prices will go, but I have yet to hear even the most bullish of bulls predict prices rising again anytime soon. If the most optimistic scenario (for bulls) is stagnation for a (long) while, and the worst is much bigger declines, I will stay on the sidelines until a compelling property at a truly attractive price presents itself (oh, and I'm not a fussy prima donna seeking a mansion on a prime block - modest house, modest block is fine as long as the hood/school works for us). And I'm not looking to buy a house for nothing - I'm placing my bets on prices returning to at least 2004 levels, and possibly lower (2002?) so that's still a hefty price tag in historical terms.

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 12, 2009 7:47 PM

mm - certainly not saying that you would be cheerleading the market after buying a place - just commenting on the way a change in position has effected the way I WANT to read market reports etc etc

and yeah, I think 2004 levels is certainly a reasonable prediction as some of the harder hit places that I know of (i.e. condos in areas like clinton hill/bed stuy border, south/east williamsburg, harlem, especially harlem) seem to be in 2004/2005 territory already. I bought my place a noticeable amount under what an apartment in the same line in the same building went for in 2006 - so I think my price was ok, for now. although I am by no means ruling out further declines. in other words, my strategy and outlook fairly well paralleled your own. I chose to buy because I found a great apartment in a neighborhood I really enjoy, the price had already come down a bit - and for boring, complicated reasons it was time for me to buy.

Posted by: perhaps at June 12, 2009 8:23 PM

mm- thanks btw!

Posted by: perhaps at June 12, 2009 8:24 PM

MM, pardon my frankness, but you strike me as a bit self-righteous. (not because our budget is lower....)Wait as long as you like my dear, but do remember life is short. You could be hit by a crosstown bus tomorrow. I think people like you really miss the point. You are so focused on beating the market ( you have not true idea of where it is going - or where interests rates are going, I might add), that you forget the pleasure of living where you want to live just to enjoy your life. Did I overpay for my absolutely stunning, fabulous house in a great neighbor (a former SRO)? Perhaps, but we love it and living here is great. I think when we are ready to sell, it will all be just fine. There are good deals in this market. If you feel superior because you are waiting, comfy in your apartment, so be it. But spare the rest of us your insights now and then, please!

Posted by: homey at June 13, 2009 12:07 PM

I don't understand the reactions people are having to Miss Muffet's posts, which are among the most level-headed and least provocative out there. Even if you disagree with her opinions, she always strikes a perfectly reasonable and conciliatory tone.

Homey - do you really think your comment that "life is short, it will all be just fine" meaningfully adds to the discussion more than MM's thoughtful, well-reasoned analysis of the market? If you disagree with her, feel free to say so and explain why, but if you would like to be "spared her insights", stop reading. MM is an asset to these forums and I, for one, would like to encourage her to continue to share her insights.

Posted by: brooklynguy at June 13, 2009 1:25 PM

Homey, I'm glad you love your home: more power to you. I've never denigrated anyone for buying at any time - it's a personal choice. Folks like Wasder may have a tinge of wishing they'd paid a bit less, but in the grand scheme of things, there is no point in having regrets for what's done, especially if you are (as you seem to be) in a house you love, can afford, and plan to be in for a long time.

But my situation, and that of many others that I know, is different. My husband and I chose rewarding, but not terribly well-paid professions. We work very hard, but don't make much money for a city like NYC. Plus, we have small kids. So for us, the choice of a home, and the price point, is inextricably bound up with pretty much every other choice in our lives - most importantly, how much time we have for our kids (smaller mortgage = less income pressure). Am I miserable now in my rental? Far from it. It's a lovely place, in a great hood, and we feel lucky frankly to be where we are. We also feel lucky to have NOT bought before the crash (we were considering it), but now that things are so clearly on the downside -- or as I said, stagnating at best (for sellers) -- it just seems foolish for us to plunk down tons of money since sellers IMHO are still often holding out for unreasonable asking prices. I might feel differently if I'd found the house of my dreams (and I assure you, they are not grand), but that has not happened. When it does, and if the price is something we're truly comfortable with, we may indeed bite.

What I find strange is how a candid discussion of prices leads me to be reviled by people like yourself. Precisely because the cost of housing can often impact SO many other aspects of your life, I think it's an important discussion to have. And that - the way cost does impact the rest of your life - is precisely why I am as obsessed as I am with real estate. It's easily going to be the biggest investment my husband and I ever make (already was in our previous purchases and sales, and now we're seeking the home to buy for the rest of our lives - the big kahuna, if you will). Not to mention the way in which real estate is so wrapped up in notions of home, family, identity, community etc. I share the view with some others on this blog that long-term, ownership beats renting, but that again is due to our particular circumstances - namely wanting to leave some financial security to our children (I might feel differently about renting if we didn't have kids, but maybe not). That said, I think there are times -- like now -- when renting makes sense on a temporary basis.

I welcome other points of view - for this reason, I'm genuinely curious to hear predictions by the more bullish on this list as to their predictions for the next 12 months, 2 years, and 5 years, and the reasons behind their predictions.

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 13, 2009 4:19 PM

Anyone picking on Miss Muffett will have to go through The Chicken first...

Posted by: the chicken at June 13, 2009 8:07 PM

It is not my intention to pick on MM. But I do want to make the point that you can over-analyze yourself onto the sidelines and miss some really great deals. Of course MM would like to see predictions and analysis of what the market will be in 1, 2 or 5 years - who wouldn't. But please let's not mistake that speculation for fact. My analysis, and I am an very experienced real estate investor who has purchased and sold several properties in NY and Los Angeles, is that you should consider the good deals out there now - as well as in 1 year, 2, and 5 years. Personally, I think 5 years is a long time to wait for a family home. Your younger children may be ready for middle school, or even high-school. Suddenly the neighborhood and primary school district are important, and other things are more so. I have seen some very good deals in this market, and plan to buy something in the next 6 months as an investment. I am looking carefully as price per square foot, not just in NYC, but across the country. ANd as for my comment "life is short," Well, I stand by it, and figure it into all my calculations. I think it is more accurate than most of the info on this blog. Cheers!

Posted by: homey at June 14, 2009 12:45 PM

MM's comments are good to have here for attaining balance, but come on, be honest, she repeatedly gloats about what she sees as her more superior position, having sold when she did. That's what homey and others react to.

Posted by: traditionalmod at June 14, 2009 2:47 PM

I find MM to be respectful of others. She, like wasder, manages to be level-headed and articulate without attacking those who have chosen differently. It is interesting view into human psychology that she is branded as a "self-righteous" person who "repeatedly gloats" when she explains her own choices without attacking others for choosing differently.

The basic thrust of Homey's 12:07 post seems to be that he is terribly concerned about whether MM is right or wrong, but he never explains why he has such an emotional investment in her financial well being. I think MM understands pretty well that there is risk in what she is doing. So why is it that Homey and Sebb so actively try to change her mind? Are they worried about what might happen to poor Mr and Mrs Muffett and their kids if they make a bad financial decision? Surely not. Are they worried that she is single-handedly sinking the market for Brooklyn real estate with her Brownstoner posts? Surely not.

The answer - if it isn't already obvious - is that humans are notoriously insecure about big finanical decisions like home buying, and there is a natural desire to attack anyone who confidently and articulately chooses differently. It's not that Homey, Sebb, etc. have any real concern about Miss Muffett's financial well being, it's that they have deep insecurities about the choices they have made and find it impossible to resist the urge to attack someone who chooses differently and sounds credible and informed in doing so.

MM could attack those who think now is the time to buy, but she doesn't. She is always gracious to those who buy and those who own even while she explains her own reasoning for not doing so. Likewise, Wasder is always gracious to folks who are on the sidelines and waiting for prices to come down further (as long as they aren't acting like jerks, of course).

None of us is capable of changing the direction of the market. The market is going where it is going, driven by forces beyond any of our control. Some of us are renters waiting to buy. Some of us are proud homeowners. (and, for the sake of completeness, some of us are just sarcastic jerks who waste their time on this board flinging poo at strangers). Hopefully we can continue to discuss our very different views without attacking those who choose differently. There is a world of difference between disagreeing with someone's viewpoint (I think the market is going up/down because...) and attacking someone personally (MM is a self-righteous gloater).

Posted by: lechacal at June 14, 2009 3:55 PM

"without attacking others for choosing differently."

Well actually, she does. Perhaps you've not read all her posts over the last year. A huge part of MM's pleasure in selling her apt earlier on when she could still get a better price for it is the fact that others did not make that choice and she can rub it in. That's what can be creepy and a turnoff.

Posted by: traditionalmod at June 14, 2009 4:50 PM

traditionalmod: Really? I usually see that information come out in response to someone telling her she chose badly, will be priced out forever, is a renter and is therefore going to "get beat" etc. In any event that strikes me as pride in making a good choice rather than attacking someone for choosing differently. There is a big difference between the two.

I am coming to MM's defense because I find myself in a very similar situation (sold in 2007 and have rented since then) and frankly see no problem with someone taking pride in that choice. I can tell you that my predictions in 2007 of a coming decline in the NYC real estate were met by derision and contempt from lots of market cheerleaders and realtors. I can't tell you how many times I got condescending comments about how smart money knows that NYC is different, it will only go up, Manhattan is an island, foreign money will save us all, etc etc etc. I can tell you that it was quite unpopular to disagree with the herd. And now if I point out that I was right all along suddenly I am attacking homeowners? That's just silly. MM is entitled to point out that she was right when she sold and rented, and I think when she does so she stops short of attacking people who chose differently.

Posted by: lechacal at June 14, 2009 7:23 PM

Hi folks;

I have to agree that Miss Muffet is quite gracious in her posts. I've never seen her resort to personal attacks, even though she has been subjected to more than her fair share. In fact, I admire how she never loses her cool and always responds with grace, even to those who are not deserving of it.

On the other hand, I have to agree with the "life is short" advice that has been given to her above. It is clear to me that Miss Muffet is a very nice person who only wants the best for her family, like most of us. However, what concerns me about her situation (and I've told her this before) is that she seems to be "all in" on her strategy of timing the housing market. When I say "all in", I mean that she seems to see it as the silver bullet for improving her family's situation.

History shows that it is exceedingly difficult even for cold-blooded investment pros to time the market correctly (be it the stock market or the housing market). When you add in the emotional factors of your kid's school, your living arrangements, etc., I think it becomes virtually impossible. Hence, I think Miss Muffet would be wise to heed DylanFan and LincolnSlope's advice above.

Anyway, I once again want to say that I think Miss Muffet is a very nice person, and I wish her and her family all the best.

Posted by: benson at June 14, 2009 8:37 PM

First, thanks for the kind words from those that offered them. Traditionalmod, I've actually gone out of my way NOT to gloat about my sale - in a way, it was dumb luck. The prime reason for us selling when we did was to get into our school zone of choice. That said, I, like lechacal, was also predicting for a while before our sale that the market would go down, and was ridiculed and called all kinds of nasty names by those who thought I was crazy. In fact, after our sale, I even felt a brief twinge of seller's remorse at one point, mostly because a home is an emotional place, but also because I did have the passing thought that perhaps, as so many people said, I was making a bad financial decision in a market that, at the time, was still defying gravity in prime NYC (despite falling elsewhere).

Benson, of course I realize that real estate is not a "magic bullet" that will somehow magically make my family's life perfect. Things are way too complex for that. But I think the reason that real estate arouses such passion is precisely because it does have a HUGE effect on your life, and when you have kids, on your family life. We really do want to buy a home, since we very much enjoyed home ownership, and look forward to being owners again. But for now, we are actually in a very nice rental where our family is very happy and going to a school we really like (our top priority right now). Renting is not the solution for us long-term (for all the benefits of home ownership much touted on this blog), but it's a great one for now. We love our neighborhood, like our apartment at least as much as our former one where we owned, and our rent is very reasonable. Ultimately, we want to buy a house where we can live the rest of our lives, ideally with some income so that the income pressure on us is eased, so we can have more family time, and perhaps the flexibility to take over more space for our growing family in the future, should our finances permit that. So, a modest 3 story with a rental is the kind of thing we're looking for - not a mansion on the park as some people like to caricature my tastes, and not for $1. Our budget is fortunately healthy due to the good luck we've had in the past, so we are blessed to have capital, but as modest earners, we have to be very careful in our choices.

The main point of my posts, and the reason I'm following the market so closely, is that there now seems to be universal consensus that the NYC market will go back in time to earlier levels (which year is up to debate - 2004 is one I hear a lot, but bears think it could go much lower). And yet, many sellers out there still seem to be in denial of this. Not all of them mind you, so yes, there are deals to be had, but not a lot due to an ongoing stand-off. When I was selling, I was actually prepared to sell for 20% below what we eventually got, since we were very serious about selling, and I guess what I find interesting is why sellers even bother to list at such high asks when their property just sits and sits and sits.

For those who say I'm running a risk in waiting, I think the risk is much greater in acting precipitously. I have yet to hear anyone provide a credible rationale for why prices will begin to move up in the next 12 months - so really, what is the risk in waiting? As for interest rates rising, that will exert more downward pressure on prices that will likely offset the increase in mortgage payments (plus in our case, we are trying to keep a relatively small mortgage so are less affected by interest rates).

Again, I am NOT trying to time the bottom - if we see a house we love, at a price we can afford, we may very well bite, but given unrealistic asking prices, and ongoing price cuts, we see no reason to rush.

Posted by: Miss Muffett at June 14, 2009 10:26 PM

In any event, what risk are you really taking? I think there is vanishingly small chance that prices suddenly spike and I miss some kind of very small window of opportunity. The real estate market just doesn't work like that. Prices will continue to grind lower for a while, and in all likelihood will level out for a period before coming back up (slowly). There is just no financial incentive to move quickly.

So there is some very small risk of buying 20% or 30% higher than I might have if I had timed it perfectly. So what -- then I'm buying at 2007 prices, but without several years of carrying costs! If that's the extent of my risk, and it has, say, a 5% chance of materializing, then it's a risk I will very happily continue to take.

Posted by: lechacal at June 15, 2009 8:11 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions