« Admirals Row House Collapses from Water Damage Nondescript East W'burg Condos Defying the Market »
June 19, 2009
LPC Signs Off on New BAM Performing Arts Building

On Tuesday, the Landmarks Preservation Commission gave a unanimous thumbs-up to H3 Hardy Collaboration Architects' design for the proposed Richard B. Fisher Building, reports the Brooklyn Eagle. The design preserves the existing facade and front portion of the existing two-story building at 321 Ashland Place currently being used by Brooklyn Music & Arts and adds a new six-story structure behind it. The Fisher building will house a performing arts center as well as some more flexible theater and rehearsal space. Work is slated to begin next spring with a target completion date of two years later.
LPC Approves Design of New BAM Performing Arts Building [Brooklyn Eagle] GMAP
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/10258
Comments
Wow. Do they want to compete with the House of Detention for most architecturally depressing structure in Brooklyn? This is worse, in a way because they have planted that tumor on a historic base.
Posted by: Beau Guest at June 19, 2009 10:08 AM
Is that razor wire at the top????
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 19, 2009 10:10 AM
How to design a building using a couple pieces of foam-cor and some popsicle sticks. I'm tempted to say the "architect" let his kid do the design while he slept off a monster hangover...
Posted by: Beau Guest at June 19, 2009 10:19 AM
Please look at H3's other work before you talk about how bad it is. By looking over their portfolio, it's very clear that this is going to be a first class project.
You can tell nothing from one photo.
http://www.h3hc.com/#/509
Posted by: 11217 at June 19, 2009 10:22 AM
I think adding plain to old is a very good approach. Normally MUCH more successful than buildings that try to match (in a cheap way) the architecture of the older structure.
Posted by: tybur6 at June 19, 2009 11:00 AM
Rumor has it that Hardy's firm wasn't very happy with the outcome of the design but either BAM's board or BAM's budget (or both) were driving the results.
Posted by: BrooklynButler at June 19, 2009 11:17 AM
that is an artsy-fartsy pergola on the roof, not razor wire. sheesh, some of youse ain't got no couth.
Posted by: sam at June 19, 2009 11:56 AM
I thought it was Nixalite.
Posted by: altervoce at June 19, 2009 12:06 PM
Not very pretty but I can see what they're trying to attempt. Quite frankly though, I'd rather see a white cube behind the current building instead of something trying to match it in color...or something by Moneo.
Let's hope the exterior and massing are decent and the finishing well-done.
Good luck Karen. Even if larger projects are on hold, at least this one may be built. I guess this project may cost 45 million dollars...more...less? Anyone know?
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at June 19, 2009 2:43 PM
Not very inspiring. And not very nice to the old building, either. Not sure if its a massive rooftop addition or a bad case of facadomy - or maybe the worst of both worlds?
Posted by: WBer at June 20, 2009 12:43 AM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.