« F.H.A. Loans Skyrocket in Popularity Cock-a-Doodle-Don't in Gowanus »
June 29, 2009
Historic District and AY: Like Pieces of a Puzzle

This map put together by Tracy Collins and picked up by the Atlantic Yards Report last week caught our eye but we didn't have room to fit it in at the end of the week. It very nicely summarizes how the newly-designated Prospect Heights Historic District overlays with the footprint of Forest City Ratner's proposed Atlantic Yards project. Cozy!
Historic District Will Wrap Around AY Parking [AY Report]
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/10367
Comments
what do you mean by "cozy"? are you suggesting that there is some kind of collusion between FCR and the LPC? and how is this news? since the historic district proposal was revised, this has been plainly obvious to anyone who can read maps.
Posted by: i disagree at June 29, 2009 10:55 AM
Is there no end to this ignominy?
Posted by: FatLenny at June 29, 2009 11:18 AM
the full article mentions that Ratner used the term "blight" to describe the area in his presentations to promote AY. Funny how much of the present blight is because Mr. Ratner tore down buildings, yet its now interlocking with a huge new historic district. Wards Bakery should have been included in that district but the LPC dropped the ball on that.
Posted by: bxgrl at June 29, 2009 11:46 AM
No, we just hadn't seen the two maps overlaid. Not suggesting anything.
Posted by: brownstoner at June 29, 2009 11:58 AM
the expanse of the historic district is fine by me. but you can't really use it to "prove" anything about blight or not-blight...particularly because so much of the advocacy that led to the designation as it is today was in fact spurred by dismay over AY. if you actually walk around some of the areas in the map - say, vanderbilt between pacific and dean - it's pretty clear that the agenda isn't necessarily to protect buildings of historic significance but rather to cock-block development. though there may be some nice buildings on that block, a couple of them are junk that doesn't really deserve protection. they carved out buildings on flatbush that look much better and seem (to my untrained eye) more significant, but not on the parts of vanderbilt closest to the footprint. but hey, like i said, doesn't bother me - i don't particularly want my whole neighborhood, even the crappy parts, to become even crappier parking garages.
Posted by: i disagree at June 29, 2009 12:02 PM
Clearly, theintent behind landmarking Prospect Heights was to forestall any more encroachment of the proposed AY arena and any more of the accessorie uses.
Posted by: BrooklynIsHome at June 29, 2009 1:17 PM
alternatives to the fat one arrive:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06292009/news/regionalnews/brooklyn/rival_rips_marty_over_yards_work_176592.htm
Posted by: werner at June 29, 2009 1:32 PM
A million dollars says that once the arena is finished, Ratner will advertise it as being located in the "historic Prospect Heights" neighborhood!
Posted by: Big Jugs at June 29, 2009 6:52 PM
Listen to me OK? The staff at the LPC are wonks. they lay the boundaries where they see the boundaries. Their holiday bonus will not be bigger one way or the other other. You know why? Because they don't get bonuses. They don't get shit. They do the grungde work and others profit. There are no all-expense-paid junkets for the LPC staff. They don't give a shit about private sector goodies because they are public sector workhorses.
Posted by: sam at June 29, 2009 9:25 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.