Sign up for the Brownstoner daily email
« Weekend Events Open Thread: Michael Jackson Edition »

June 26, 2009

Big Turnout for Rally Against Homeless Intake Center

bedford-atlantic-armory-062609.jpg
Montrose Morris was on the scene for last night's rally against the homeless intake center in Crown Heights and filed this report.

The gym at St.Peter Claver School was full of people for last night's rally against the homeless intake center plan for the Bedford Atlantic Armory. The rally was organized by CHRM (Crown Heights Revitalization Movement) and local elected officials, and was run by community activist Mark Griffiths, CHRM member, and candidate for city council representing Crown Heights and Bed Stuy. Several speakers outlined the history of the shelter, Bloomberg’s plan for bringing the intake center to Central Brooklyn, and the steps taken by a concerned Crown Heights community to stop it.

The opposition to the city’s plans is a coalition of black, white, Asian, Latin, young, and old, community members, as well as clergy, politicians, and advocates and workers with the homeless. It was announced that local elected officials, including City Council Members Letitia James and Bill deBlasio, Assemblyman Karim Camara, State Senator Eric Adams and others have retained the high power, well connected law firm of Gibson Dunn, with the lead lawyer on the case being Jim Walden, a Brooklyn resident, backed up by former deputy mayor, and firm partner Randy Mastrow. Randy seems to have come back to the Light from the Dark Side days as a Giuliani powerbroker, and the firm is taking the case pro bono. It is hoped that the seriousness of the community in fighting this will convince the city to rethink a seriously flawed plan.

In addition to hearing attorney Jim Walden speak about legal strategies, we also were fired up by an impassioned speech by Letitia James...

...which brought the audience out of their seats shouting and clapping. Her assertion that “it’s all about politics” was echoed by Marty Markowitz, who was incensed that he never even got a phone call from the Mayor’s office advising him that the intake center was coming to Brooklyn. He called the plan for the center “irrational” and “ridiculous” and was personally offended that mayor was exercising what Marty called a “philosophy of social pioneering” in Crown Heights. This was further articulated by Bill deBlasio, who announced that the elected officials in the Manhattan Bellevue Center area were among the first to announce support for the Brooklyn efforts to block the center. Representatives of other local politicians: Ed Towns, Annette Robinson and mayoral candidate Bill Thompson also spoke in support of the community. Conspicuous in his absence was City Councilman Al Vann, who is supposed to represent most of the the Bed Stuy and Crown Heights community affected by the center. Tish James, who has spent more political time on this issue than anyone, represents only two blocks of Crown Heights, over near the Armory. Vann is supposed to represent all of the rest of us, and has done nothing.

The evening ended with statements from homeowners who live near the shelter, who spoke of horrendous conditions within the Armory shelter, as well as seeing the doors open at 7AM, with the homeless men spilling out into the street with no where to go, and no place to go relieve themselves, except in the streets, and in people’s front yards. They expressed their disgust at the smells and filth, and the degradation of human beings who are forced to act this way. A representative of the Coalition for the Homeless also told of being in the Armory just today, where he could see that the construction and retrofit of the shelter into an intake center was 90% complete, something that was not slated to take place until New York State’s process of investigation and inquiry was done. New York has not placed their seal of approval on the project yet, something that the law requires. The city was not supposed to go ahead like this was a done deal, but they did anyway, in spite of the massive vocal and written opposition to the project. The Coalition representative also made clear that his organization is firmly against having the intake center for all of the city’s homeless relocated to Brooklyn. The rally ended with renewed calls to action, getting the word out to everyone, and plans for more rallies, petitions, and calls to the Mayor. A coalition of all of the communities involved is growing and more proactive and effective protests are in the works. If the city doesn’t reconsider, the lawsuit will follow.

CB8 Votes Against Re-Opening Homeless Shelter [Brownstoner]
City Reneging on Homeless Intake Center Promise? [Brownstoner]
Update on the Bedford Armory Homeless Saga [Brownstoner]
Homeless Intake Center Plan Provokes Broad Opposition [Brownstoner]
Photo by erlogan




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/10362

Comments

"where he could see that the construction and retrofit of the shelter into an intake center was 90% complete, something that was not slated to take place until New York State’s process of investigation and inquiry was done"

This sort of sneakiness sounds like Giuliani-era stuff.

Posted by: dittoburg at June 26, 2009 9:09 AM

The choice of headline and photo for this thread made me laugh. "Big Turnout for Rally Against Homeless Intake Center" followed by a photo with exactly one person in it. I thought the headline was sarcastic until I read the text.

Posted by: TD at June 26, 2009 9:23 AM

This is exactly what I like to see. Once in a while people seem to realise that we all basically want the same thing.

Posted by: Joe from Brooklyn at June 26, 2009 9:32 AM

It was nice seeing you last night MM and bxgrl.

Seeing the turnout last night made me optimistic. Finally, other neighborhoods have come to the realization that the mayor's proposal to make the armory the intake center for NYC is not "just" a Crown Heights problem. If the mayor didn't feel the need to notify our borough president of his plans, it clearly indicates his total disregard for Brooklyn.

Gone are the days where we will sit back and allow our community to be utilized as a dumping ground when Manhattan doesn't want to deal with the city's issues.

Posted by: faithful at June 26, 2009 9:39 AM

What an embarrassment Al Vann is to Bedford Stuyvesant.

I suppose it would only be fair to find out the reason for his absence. Was it due to his needed presence at a more pressing issue? At the vary least he should have sent a representative to show face or deliver a prepared statement. He appears to be leaving it up to his peers to do the job for his district that he was elected to do. This is lazy, callous, negligent and indifferent behavior from a politician towards a community who has supported him for years! There is no excuse.

Posted by: malcats at June 26, 2009 9:47 AM

One of the most galling aspects of this situation is that Bloomberg seems unwilling to even try to articulate an argument for why he is allowing his administration to do this. In public they simply pretend they are not doing it by limply maintaining that they are considering opening a facility in Manhattan as well (though they will give no details, and have defunded Manhattan intake in the budget). It sounds like behind closed doors they offer a wonkish argument that the interests of the homeless and Brooklyn communities must be sacrificed to meet some other vague objective. This kind of obvious dishonesty is a real negative mark for Bloomberg.

Posted by: Dr Dean Franklin at June 26, 2009 9:55 AM

malcats...is Al Vann's seat what Bill Cunningham is running for???

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 26, 2009 10:03 AM

"This sort of sneakiness sounds like Giuliani-era stuff."

Pure Bloomberg,if you ask me. This man has become an elitist autocrat. I will not be voting for him.

Posted by: Susan Elkins at June 26, 2009 10:10 AM

I 2nd that. No way I'd vote for King Mike again.

Posted by: Petebklyn at June 26, 2009 10:20 AM

Al Vann showed up for the very first rally, stuck his nose in the door for one or two meetings, sent a very disinterested and bored rep to a major meeting (who spent more time caressing his cell phone than paying attention) and other than that has been useless. It was a really good meeting last night and gratifying to see so many people there. everyone spoke well but Tish James was amazing. She got a standing ovation-

Bloomberg has a long history of autocracy. We fought him over the closing of firehouses- we even gathered well over 30,000 signatures. We had hearings, and the City Council held more hearings and the state held hearings. He ignored all of it. He put pressure on the councilmen to vote his way on the budget that year- Yassky threw us over.

Posted by: bxgrl at June 26, 2009 10:31 AM

Susuan, who do you intend to vote for - or will you abstain?

Posted by: dittoburg at June 26, 2009 10:41 AM


"This kind of obvious dishonesty is a real negative mark for Bloomberg."

Worth repeating.

Posted by: East New York at June 26, 2009 11:47 AM

Al Vann's absence MAY go way beyond laziness and indifference. Long before yesterday, in the context of nearby Sumner Ave armory, there were rumors among the Bed Stuy Assoc. that he has a financial stake in the intake shelters coming to fruition. Specifically, he has ties to organizations like the Black Veterans' Association, which gets hefty sums of public $ to run the shelters, even though there is no programming. My info is spotty and I have no evidence of this being true, but his absence during opposition efforts certainly does not clear up the aspersions. He should be investigated.

I am definitely not voting for Bloomberg because of this.

Posted by: blowfish at June 26, 2009 11:54 AM

I'm with you blowfish.

Posted by: bxgrl at June 26, 2009 12:14 PM

The savings rate just reported is now 6.9%. Incredible.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 26, 2009 12:46 PM

Sorry, wrong thread.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at June 26, 2009 12:47 PM

wish I had been able to be there last night....

aren't we - and by we I do not merely mean the 35th, but Brooklyn in general - lucky to have so dedicated a public servant as Tish James?

visible and vocal on every issue that is important not just to those of us lucky enough to be her constituents, but to all Brooklyn and indeed NYC.

Posted by: epkwy at June 26, 2009 1:06 PM

Tish is amazing. We need a real fighter like her. Again I repeat- Al Vann is useless.

Posted by: bxgrl at June 26, 2009 1:40 PM

Leticia is going to be the Mayor of New York City someday in the not too distant future--maybe four years?

She's seasoning now, building her base.

Posted by: WonTon at June 26, 2009 2:34 PM

I hope so, WonTon. were you also there?

Posted by: bxgrl at June 26, 2009 3:55 PM

Al Vann has done NOTHING for Bed Stuy!! He just sits around and watch the multiple 'half way' homes sprouting out everywhere in Bed Stuy - he did nothing to stop it - including the one on Stuyvesant Heights. People - we are the ones that put him into that position,we can also claim it back and give it to someone more deserving,hard working and someone that cares for our community! As it is, Bed Stuy is already getting a bad rap for being Bed Stuy. I say let's vote him out and get a more willing council member to represent us. This is my community and I am very proud of it - until now.....

Posted by: ban at June 26, 2009 4:18 PM

I'm voting for Mark Winston Griffith in the 36th, I think. He was endorsed by Working Families.

Posted by: blowfish at June 26, 2009 4:48 PM

ban- he completely ignores us- look at one of his newsletters. I swear he would choke if he had to write "Crown Heights" in it. We shouldn't just vote him out of office- we should make sure people see just how badly he has shortchanged the very people who put him in office and kept him there. He couldn't even be bothered to show up last night- how telling.And he had better not say he was mourning Michael Jackson- so were a lot of us and we still did what we had to.

Posted by: bxgrl at June 26, 2009 5:05 PM

Letitia James mayor? That's a laugh! Only in her dreams.

I highly doubt this and other rallies and "community action" will make a difference. Bloomberg, like most rich men, usually get their way in the end.

Posted by: Big Jugs at June 26, 2009 10:03 PM

Jugsy! We were wondering when you'd show up! So, sounds like you're downgrading your certainty that the community cannot make a difference to "highly doubting", which means you're no longer totally ruling it out. Good to hear you're slowly coming around, BJ.

Also, you still haven't articulated why you think the City's plan is such a good one. Does the following capture your position (feel free to respond with edits):

"I think it's a swell idea to concentrate all homeless services for the entire city of New York into a small number of working class communities of color in central Brooklyn. I furthermore think it would be great to make sure this concentration of services was in an area that is hard for the homeless to get to, and is devoid of hospitals, jobs and social service programs, but has an active drug trade and gang problems."

Posted by: Dr Dean Franklin at June 26, 2009 11:01 PM

Letitia James was amazing at this meeting. We are very lucky to have such a strong person pushing for fairness and equality.

Posted by: CrownHeight at July 10, 2009 2:25 PM

What we REALLY need is to stop voting for ANYONE unless we know what their record in the community is. Al Vann has never done anything to be re-elected so blame yourselves if you keep letting him stay. Same for Charles Rangel in Harlem. This guy is a piece of work yet he continues to be voted in time and time again simply because he's been around for a hundred years.

Come on people. Do your homework and use your vote the way it was meant to be used. We have to stop simply pulling the lever just on name recognition. That's irresponsible. These people work for US - now make them work!

Posted by: elpee at September 4, 2009 4:30 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions