« Checking In On 500 4th Avenue Last Week's Biggest Sales »

May 12, 2009

Price Cut at 355 Degraw Street

355-Degraw-Street-Brooklyn-0509.jpgThis has flown under our radar 'til now...This two-family, four-story brick house at 355 Degraw Street in Carroll Gardens hit the market asking $1,950,000 in early April and was just reduced yesterday by a modest $75,000 to $1,875,000. It was recently renovated and has a nice modern feel without having lost its original charm. The new price should attract some interest, dontcha think? Has anyone been inside? Here's the listing. GMAP




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/9716

Comments

where's the listing?

Posted by: gkw at May 12, 2009 11:23 AM

Not sure a 3.8% drop is gonna do 'er, but I've given up trying to accurately predict what's going to sell in the above-a-million-bucks range.

Posted by: cwbuecheler at May 12, 2009 11:24 AM

A 3.8% price cut?????!!!!!! Some people really do have sh!t for brains.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at May 12, 2009 11:28 AM

Seems like a fair price to me.

Posted by: sebb at May 12, 2009 11:30 AM

Listing??????

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at May 12, 2009 11:37 AM

Death by a thousand cuts.

Posted by: SnarkSlope at May 12, 2009 11:41 AM

Good location. Can't see the inside, though.

Posted by: dt at May 12, 2009 11:45 AM

Here is the listing. It looks pretty darn good to me. This is one of the better deals out there. The house is not so deep, but they did a thoughtful reno and the yard could be killer.
http://www.rsblvd.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&listingid=1527476#

Posted by: homey at May 12, 2009 11:49 AM

the house looks nice on the outside and the block is very nice but the price cut seems very subtle. If they could not find a buyer at 1.95 why do they think they will find one at 1.87? Seems odd.

Posted by: sam at May 12, 2009 11:49 AM

It seems to me like it takes at least a 10% drop to feel like you're getting a "deal" or that the price has been substantially reduced.

Posted by: cwbuecheler at May 12, 2009 12:02 PM

House sold for $1.36 million in 2004. At this point in the correction, what would really justify a 38% increase in the price since then?

The S&P 500 index is down about 20% since 2004; the NYC unemployment rate is up from about 7.4% in March 2004 to around 8.4% in March 2009 (with the unemployment rate in the professional sectors likely being much greater in '09 than '04); the City's finances are in substantially worse condition, meaning property and other taxes likely will need to be raised in the near term; the Boerum Hill/Carroll Gardens/Cobble Hill area hasn't substantially changed since '04 (incremently changed, yes -- but the substantial changes occurred from '98 to '04 or so).

I suppose mortgage rates are probably down about 100 bp since '04, but access to financing likely is much tougher, so that seems like a wash. Incomes (at least in the top quartile) have probably increased since '04, don't know exactly how much.

I know that we can point to comps, etc. But really, what would justify such a sharp increase in the price?

Posted by: aishling at May 12, 2009 12:10 PM

I lost a Corcoran closed bidding for this house in 2004. We put in a bid over ask, and the house sold for about $150,000 more than that.

I remember the house being nice, but it's only 17 feet wide. Ultimately, we were glad we didn't win the bidding. We would not have had the leftover cash to do a renovation as nice as the one done by the current owners. It was not in great shape in 2004.

Posted by: JBfromCarrollGardens at May 12, 2009 12:28 PM

i never get the point of cutting asking price by such a token amount. . .
to me, it sends a signal of weakness, without the wow factor of a bigger cut that might actually get a deal done.

Posted by: ontheparkway at May 12, 2009 12:35 PM

aishling: i'm going to take a wild guess and say that maybe they did a major renovation and maybe this justifies some increase in price.

Posted by: i disagree at May 12, 2009 12:36 PM

Beautiful renovation. The paint looks like clay paint, really clean and vibrant and warm, not that garish white that you get with standard latex. Just a guess.

What a fantastic solution to the ceilings -- instead of boring flat ceilings (assuming the crowns were no longer available to restore) or putting in new crown moldings, just taking the ceiling off entirely and adding that grittier, tougher edge of the beams to an otherwise elegant setting. LOVE IT. The only question I'd have is acoustic insolation -- when you don't have a ceiling over your beams, you can hear everything between the floors.

Anyway, if the owners or architects are reading this, stellar job people!

Posted by: iz at May 12, 2009 12:40 PM

insolation = insulation

Posted by: iz at May 12, 2009 12:42 PM

the house is beautiful. they obviously did a really major renovation. The rear yard is fantastic. I really like this house and it looks move-in ready. but I have no idea what the price should be. the economy is bad but there are always those people who prosper in bad times. they will expect a bargain though. If it sells at all, I think it will sell for under 1.6.


Posted by: sam at May 12, 2009 12:46 PM

i disagree -- that's fair and may account for part of the increase. i am skeptical that they renovated the entire house -- the pictures of the second apartment are absent.

iz -- not sure that I agree on the ceilings. don't love the look, but more importantly, a few months back there was a discussion about coop's granting approval to an owner wanting to make this change -- the general concensus was that it was a v. bad idea, given that you are significantly reducing the length of time that the ceiling could withstand a fire. Obviously, in your own house, your decision isn't going to affect your upstairs' neighbor, but I still don't think it would be worth the trade off.

Posted by: aishling at May 12, 2009 12:49 PM

Great renovation! -
but they have to come down more to make people jump and pull the trigger on this place.
A $75K price cut is NOT going to inspire the potential buyers who have already looked at this place and thought "wow what a great house, wish it were cheaper"
and it won't really inspire any new buyers who's price range might range into 1.8 territory

Chop it to 1.6mil and you will get a lot of action and might even cause a bit of a bidding war to 1.7

Posted by: gemini10 at May 12, 2009 12:51 PM

The upper apartment does not have much of a kitchen. That is a big minus. This house would work best as a single-family (it's only 17 feet wide) turn the little kitchen into a half bath and you're done.

Posted by: sam at May 12, 2009 12:59 PM

Mr. B, keep an eye on this one. Its selling price (if there will be one) will be indicative of the market, considering this is a pretty attractive property on every level (location, renovation, layout).

Posted by: iz at May 12, 2009 1:04 PM

Beautiful house and renovation. It's too bad it's zoned for PS 32. I have no idea about the price. It seems in line with comps, but the difficulty with jumbo loans makes it hard to figure out.

Posted by: Maly at May 12, 2009 1:05 PM

There are no more million dollar homes in Brooklyn unless you find someonr crazy enough to pay cash for one. This seller bought it in 2004 at 1.3 and wants to make a 300k profit on it now with this market? Good luck to him. He is lucky if he gets what he paid for it.

Posted by: hannible at May 12, 2009 1:36 PM

Although this house looks nice, I don't get why everyone is saying that it is a beautiful renovation. It does look clean and simple but why is it beautiful? There doesn't appear to be any 'modern' features or even much original charm.
And the yard is a box with those stockyard fencing.
I knda agree with the comments on the price drop. Back in the good old days bidding would push a price up. But now I think if I were looking to buy I would be making offers of at least 10% less. There is only one buyer for any house and they will have to listen to the offers that are made.

Posted by: oldtimer at May 12, 2009 1:48 PM

hannible....look up there^^^^^^^^Last Weeks Biggest Sales. Team bear can usually be proven wrong with a mere statement of the facts.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at May 12, 2009 2:00 PM

Looks like a really nice place to live, airy and bright, even if it's not one of those 25 foot wide places. That should count for something.

Posted by: Alice at May 12, 2009 2:06 PM

Oldtimer, have you ever done a gut renovation?

Posted by: iz at May 12, 2009 2:46 PM

Hi Isabel
No, I have never done a gut renovation. I imagine that you are suggesting that if I had done so I would be impressed with the interior of this building. Is that what you are saying?
I going to have another look to try and see what it this that I am missing. I know that the yard just looked like three sides of stock fencing. It may be tanquil like a prision yard (I trying out sarcasism, I notice that it is very popular with many posters)But it doesn't have the simlicity of an asian garden or the blooming charm of a european yard.
But dear Iz, getting back to my not having done a gut renovation. If the whole guts are indeed removed then the designer has complete freedom to create a completely new environment. I have seen many spectacle 'modern' spaces in old warehouse and brownstones when the builder was not restricted by any detail.
This does not look the case but I will look again. I have already said too much. It's not a bad space, put in a couple of Barcelona chairs and a Tukish rug and it would be perfect.

Posted by: oldtimer at May 12, 2009 3:07 PM

De Iz
I had another look and I regret my critical comments. It doesn't look bad at all. But it doesn' look anything special nor lived in. I would guess that the building was renovated to be sold not occupied. A gut renovation would have cost between 100 to 200 k. If they paid 1.4 million five years ago then I hope that they get the asking price, because it's pretty fair.

But if the yard is fantasic then mine must be Versaille (I'm still have a go at the sarcasm)


Posted by: oldtimer at May 12, 2009 3:17 PM

"A gut renovation would have cost between 100 to 200k."

maybe in 1985.

Posted by: z at May 12, 2009 4:27 PM

z
Please give me a call when you are looking to do some construction and tell me how much you would like to spend. Maybe 100k is too low but I could make a very decent profit with a $200 estimate. But you can spend as much as you want and a good contractor can find ways to put your money to good use.
But let's say they did spend more; 400 K. then add that to the purchase price of 1.4 million. Well their return is, in the words of Elvis, less than zero. Also if this was a gut renovation then they didn't get to enjoy living there.
We should be feeling sorry for the seller

Posted by: oldtimer at May 12, 2009 4:42 PM

I went to the open house several weeks ago, and this is a very nice home. The backyard is great, although the two large trees limit your possibliites. The only issues I had with it were that it was currently set up as a one family and that it is in a poor school district. I have looked at several Brooklyn homes recently and always find it strange that the agents rarely know the district the house is in. I imagine, most buyers are like myself, with young children.

Posted by: BKLandlord at May 12, 2009 6:00 PM

"House sold for $1.36 million in 2004. At this point in the correction, what would really justify a 38% increase in the price since then?"

Aishling, prices have gone up significantly since 2004, and have only come down about 10 percent this year in areas such as this. For example, I used to own a coop in Queens that went up 40 percent in value in 2005, then went up 10 percent every year. In the last year, asking prices are down 10 percent from peak, and I would guess it would take about 10 percent off ask to get a deal done.

Posted by: mopar at May 12, 2009 6:49 PM

Learn to read Inglish Daveinbedsty. The word price cut means the price is coming down. But then again if you smoke bongs all day reading becomes pretty difficult

Posted by: hannible at May 12, 2009 7:09 PM

> "Learn to read Inglish Daveinbedsty."

Best. Post. Ever!

Posted by: SnarkSlope at May 12, 2009 8:33 PM

BKLandlord
"Two large trees limit your possibilities" So many gardens are ruined by too much organic matter; trees, bushes, shrubs etc., I think that if the whole yard had been spread with a coat of cement then skies the limit. You would never have to rake leaves or be bugged by blossoms and blooms. They create havoc, especially in the Spring, when an open space will become completely over run. Also trees can pose a danger to children who might want to climb them.
I'm not sure whether your comment that most home buyers are like you; with children is very P.C. In fact it is downright parentist. Brooklyn accepts all types that want to buy a house. Maybe they don't have young children. Maybe they have no children. Maybe they are just lonely children looking for a home.
Remember that we may all have parents but we don't all have children

Posted by: oldtimer at May 12, 2009 11:56 PM

mopar
If this was a gut renovation that cost $515 K as Z suggests then they are breaking even. And have not made a penny on their 2004 investment.

Posted by: oldtimer at May 13, 2009 12:00 AM

SnarkSlope
That was a great post. Learn to read Inglish Daveinbedsty indeed. Doesn't everyone have enough to do learning how to read Ulyess and Gravitys Rainbow.

Posted by: oldtimer at May 13, 2009 12:06 AM

hannible....are you in the Ginos, Guidos & Dudes video???? See the OT.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at May 13, 2009 8:10 AM

old timer, The children comment is an objective observation made after attending about 50 open houses in Brooklyn town home market over the past year. You rarely see a couple or singles looking at 5 bedroom sales. Obviously this struck a cord with you, it's just a fact, not an insult...

Posted by: BKLandlord at May 13, 2009 3:46 PM

Yes I have seen those famous 5 bedroom Brooklyn apartments. It is just a one family apartment with a bed in everyroom. If you are willing to sleep in the bathtub it turns into a 5 bedroom plus additional bunk. The landlorda say gimmi nother 200 hundred dollar rent. Da real estate a Brooklyn very very expensiva.

Posted by: hannible at May 13, 2009 6:48 PM

BKLandlord, That was one fine response, but not objective. You had said that most buyers are parents of young children based on attending 50 open houses. I think that going to open houses may be a weekend past time for your demographic group; a parent of young children. Open houses are for nosey neighbours to snoop around and for realtors to catch more leads.
Your objective observation reflects lookers not necessarily buyers. but there again you might be right. Me ? Personally ? I and my wife bought about five years before our children turned up. I saw less than ten buildings and did not look at anything too big and a realtor would not show you something that you could not afford. If I haven't found a home after dragging the young uns around fifty houses I better start to rethink what I am looking for.

Posted by: oldtimer at May 14, 2009 8:44 AM

oldtimer et al. How hard is it for a broker to know something about a property they are selling. After all what are they being paid for? To follow you around a house and be annoying? Likely reason they didn't "know" is because they are deceitful and figured telling you something you didn't want to hear (ps 3x) is not good for sales. BK is spot on.

As for your purchasing prowess, oldtimer, hats off to you. However all of your comments reflect a significant amount of ignorance, so I'm taking all of them with a grain of salt. But then again, you probably bought your has for 20K, and out of complete and utter luck it has turned into something worth 1+M. So, the rest of us are looking at spending actual $$$ and if it takes looking at 300 over-priced houses than so be it. Owning a house worth 1+M and having the capacity to buy a 1+M house are 2 totally different things. Everyone should not confuse the two.

As for selling, good luck to all you agents who haven't had to work for the past 7 years selling houses. One thing a real salesman knows is that you never judge a book by its cover and "the customer is always right". I'd show a kid on the corner of a street a house if I was an agent. Who knows maybe his dad is a VC titan, and will buy the house, cause his kid likes it.

Posted by: goodoleboy at May 14, 2009 9:46 PM

Dear Good Old Boy/BKLandlord.
Do you think that the agents are annoying you because they are not parents and do not appreciate your children and thought that making a commission would be easier than working and who cares about school districts anyway. And if you want to be living in a million dollar home then what are you doing sending your kids to the local PS. Get thee to a Packer/StAnns/Montesorri and don't you be going to no PS.
But you already know which is the school District du Jour of your demographic so why bother looking out of those areas.

You are right I did buy at 30K a building that now gets offered at 2 million. But there again that was a lot of money (and still is)it was all that I could afford. I think that I was making less than 20 k back then. But then it was a nice mixed neighourhood, of course Smith was a no go zone at night. But there were a few good years before Crack appeared and sketchy was not even a word. But I knew nothing about school districts coz I had no kids.
You say that you have looked at 300 over-priced houses and not found a home. How does that make you feel ? Maybe this is not your time and you are wasting time with all these house tours. How do your family enjoying going to the open houses on the weekends ?
But good luck to you and enjoy everyday.


Posted by: oldtimer at May 14, 2009 11:14 PM

This has to stop but it is fun.
You say that a good salesman doesn't judge a book by looking at the cover (Hey Bo Diddley )Do you feel that these agents are disrespectful and treat you like a kid ?
I'm sorry that I'm mocking you. Here is what you need to do; determine how much house you can afford (counting in deductions, rentals, insurance etc.,) decide your school districts ( but remember that schools are only good for 4 years) and stop getting mad at agents. They never change, they are sales people. Instead of going to all these open houses just run head first into a brick wall twenty times. It will give your kids a laugh and a relief from you asking questions about school districts. By now they know them as well as you do.
You just need a home don't make it so hard on everyone.

Posted by: oldtimer at May 14, 2009 11:34 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions