« Brooklyn Fare Launching Today BAM Theater for a New Audience Not Dead »

April 22, 2009

Walkabout With Montrose: Build Me a House of Sturdy Brick

Mankind’s oldest building material is brick. Before they shaped stone with tools, our ancestors dried mud and other materials in the sun and stacked them to make shelters, altars and marketplaces. Centuries later, the father of the Arts and Crafts Movement, William Morris, commissioned a home that would realize all of his philosophies and ideals, not out of stone, as was the fashion in 19th century, upper middle class England, but in warm, red brick. The Red House remains the quintessential Arts and Crafts home, a repository and workshop for a movement that would change the industrialized Victorian world, and influence future architects such as HH Richardson and Frank Lloyd Wright.

In going through my photographs, I realize that my favorite buildings are brick. Not limestone or brownstone, but brick. Sometimes the bricks are classic terra cotta, sometimes white, or golden yellow, grey, black, or even purple. In fact, if you look closely, most of historic, Brownstone Brooklyn really is made out of brick. The various stone facades are only cladding, the building is really brick. With the exception of wooden framed houses, this is a brick city.

Brick is well complemented by the various combination of materials used with it, especially in the later Queen Anne and Revival movements, and all of the goodies: ashlar stone, terra cotta, carved stone, ironwork, stained glass, wood trim, and hardware are mixed with wonderful wild abandon on our streets. This innovation did not end with the 19th century, either. Some of the best brickwork in my neighborhood can be found in the apartment buildings and other structures built as late as the late 1930’s. Even the fact that the less than admired “Fedders” houses are clad in some kind of brick shows that this medium resonates at all levels, even today.

I do admit to a special fondness for the different ways that architects use brick work by itself to achieve patterns and massing. Bricks are used in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal patterns. They jut out to catch our eye, or recess to create depth. They shape archways, they frame windows. They curve around to suggest great mass and create fortresses, whether in armories, churches or apartment buildings. Grey bricks are somber, gold bricks suggest richness. Multicolored patterns can hint of foreign lands and times, while terra cotta can suggest great age and majesty, as well as a classic vision of home and hearth. In the end, the commonality of all buildings is illustrated in a crumbling foundation of brick. All show the architects’ talent in using the mundane to achieve greatness, as well as the skills of thousands of expert bricklayers whose creations still stand after all these years with little or no attention or special care. So look around, enjoy the Flickr link, and take a closer look at the possibilities and beauty of the common brick.




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/9367

Comments

zzz

Posted by: randolph at April 22, 2009 10:44 AM

Montrose, I'm really enjoying your posts. Thank you. Those Romans really knew what they were doing, huh? Who'd a thunk that bricks could be so interesting?

Posted by: GHB at April 22, 2009 10:52 AM

Crown Heights North - well well well represented. MM, I'll tell the fellow dean residents that the bldg got some spot light again.

Love brick - 1 of the easier & cheaper materials to maintain, repair, etc.

too bad today's new construction bldgs do not incorporate any patterns with the brick work else they would be more appealing to the eye

Posted by: more4less at April 22, 2009 10:52 AM

I would guess that mankind's oldest building material was animal hides and sticks. Brick only makes sense for a settled people which came much later.

Enjoyed the flickr photoset just the same!

Posted by: phripley at April 22, 2009 10:57 AM

randolph...can you appreciate anything on here or are you just here as a pathetic lurker???

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at April 22, 2009 11:01 AM

dave- I think randolph's abilities are well represented by his/her own post.

Loved the story MM-although phripley is most likely right, it takes nothing away from the story or the bricks :-)

Posted by: bxgrl at April 22, 2009 11:27 AM

I've always liked when bricks are used to create a rounded facade (like a castle, or silo-looking thing).
Nice pics.

Posted by: broadwayron at April 22, 2009 11:46 AM

Montrose, I love your posts. Maybe not as likely to incite a big debate full of name calling but great nonetheless.

Posted by: serpentor at April 22, 2009 11:47 AM

Your posts are so interesting, Montrose! And you're bringing attention to a lovely neighborhood that a lot of us had previously overlooked. Thank you!

Posted by: Park Sloper at April 22, 2009 11:51 AM

great photos! that queen anne chimney on st. marks looks pretty precarious . . .

Posted by: z at April 22, 2009 12:00 PM

Red brick is may fave too, when it isn't limestone. MM - have you seen the old Mechnics and Traders bank in Greenpoint? Lots of lovely brickwork there (with terracotta and brownstone too).

Posted by: dittoburg at April 22, 2009 12:00 PM

things you have to put together bit by bit are always so much nicer than prefab stuff.. thanks monty!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at April 22, 2009 12:02 PM

rob- maybe you'll come to the Crown Height House tour this year? You should- you'll have a great time and meet nice people.

Posted by: bxgrl at April 22, 2009 12:08 PM

Once again great work. So often we overlook the wonderful brickwork that is around us here in NYC. Too bad there are not people who still do this kind of artistic architecture today. Thanks for bringing attention to CHN and BS.

Posted by: Amzi Hill at April 22, 2009 12:10 PM

My fave brick buildings are herstmonceux castle and hampton court palace. Not so much Brooklyn, more far far eastern end of Long Island.

Posted by: dittoburg at April 22, 2009 12:13 PM

oh ill def. go bxgrl, thanks

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at April 22, 2009 12:14 PM

The Victorian brick buildings of the East Coast are especially striking to West Coast transplants. I never saw a brick Romanesque revival building until I walked through Park Slope.

In the West, it's mostly stick Victorian, probably because of earthquakes and plentiful trees. Up to the 1930s, every house had coolers and built-ins made from Douglas Fir.

Posted by: mopar at April 22, 2009 12:16 PM

Thanks for the complements, everyone.

Dittoburg, welcome back! I must admit, Greenpoint is not a neighborhood I know at all, that bank sounds very cool. Love Hampton Ct. Palace, too.

Z, I hope they stabilize that chimney before a good wind destroys it. That house has such unrealized potential. But over the years it has been "repaired" with cement blobs which try to look like that Black Forest brickwork, but are probably adding to its total destruction. It's just outside the landmarked district, and is on the list for a later Phase in the CHN landmarking process, but for right now, just languishes from benign neglect. The carriage house behind it is reason enough for someone to want to rehab the whole thing. I would love to see the inside.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at April 22, 2009 12:22 PM

I have always loved brick buildings, but what are they using to make the brick these days. Why does the brick look so terrible in new construction?

Posted by: bedstuy11216 at April 22, 2009 12:33 PM

Thanks MM, another great piece.

Posted by: bayridgegirl at April 22, 2009 12:48 PM

True, but all in all, I think it's "just another brick in the wall." Sorry couldn't help but say that.

On a less humorous note, I think the most interesting thing about this post is MM's statement that "Mankind’s oldest building material is brick." I never thought or realized that. But, I've always felt that a brick wall, made of handmade old brick that's not perfect and symetrical, has amazing character and just speaks to you. That's why I love exposed brick. Maybe the sight of it touches some primal part of the brain that has been hardwired to recognize it. Anyhow, thanks for the interesting posts MM.

Posted by: Brooklynnative at April 22, 2009 12:54 PM

MM, as always thanks for another terrific teach. There is a new bldg on Atlantic and Bond I think that did a design with the brick. If you're not paying attention one may miss it. I appreciated their efforts since it's a commercial medical bldg.

Posted by: DeLepp at April 22, 2009 12:55 PM

Montrose:

Nice pix on flickr. You're definitely claiming space for Crown Heights in Brownstone Brooklyn.

A number of your buildings are where childhood friends of mine lived during the 50s when my family was in the neighborhood. It's as if I'm about to push open the doors and visit them!

Little kids aren't particularly conscious of architectural quality and detail, but they do leave an impression carried for life. I'm happy your column allowed me to get close to my old haunts again, and to be reminded of the advantages of having grown up where I did.

Thanks.

Nostalgic on Park Avenue

Posted by: NOP at April 22, 2009 1:23 PM

Thank you MM! So intriguing to look at the beautiful details and to think about the work and thought that go into building creatively with it!

Posted by: cobblehiller at April 22, 2009 1:28 PM

Thanks Montrose for bringing this beauty straight to our monitors.

Posted by: TownhouseLady at April 22, 2009 1:35 PM

I love old brick facades. one of the biggest differences to my eye between old and new brickwork is the width of the joints. in old buildings the joints are paper thih, while in new construction one usually sees big sloppy joints that look crude by comparison. it is almost like the art of bricklaying has evolved backwards from refined to crude.

Posted by: mcKenzie at April 22, 2009 1:42 PM

These articles of yours are such a wonderful distraction and lift from the same old tired stuff about the tanking economy, guessing and discussing the real estate market and the gentrification culture wars. Instead, you offer us some space to relax for a moment and think about "seeing" the very buildings and neighborhoods that are the stuff of all the above. Indeed, in the early days of Brownstoner, I thought, and certainly hoped, the emphasis would be more in this direction. So thanks, MM for bringing us back to love archictecture and history -- and especially in sharing how gracefully it lives in the so-called "fringe" areas of our borough. Keep 'em coming 'cause I'm definitely lovin' it!

Posted by: Brooklynista at April 22, 2009 1:48 PM

NOP.. some kids do. ilived in the projects in jersey for a few years as a kid. from 10-13. in the same development they had brownstones. mini versions of them. it was meadowview avenue in north bergen nj. i cant find much about them. they were so pretty and everyone in the buildings wanted to get into one. my bedroom window looked on them. so i had a great view. i had friends in them but they were teeeeeeeeeeeeny. but that was ok. i am so curious about their construction!

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at April 22, 2009 1:53 PM

I associate brick with schools / hospitals / municipal buildings that I remember from growing up as well. Brick buildings are still among my favorites. Wooden houses often look flimsy (although guess there is a big notable exception locally to that locally in Victorian Flatbush).
Thanks again for the article Montrose - a very welcome and educational diversion.

Posted by: etson at April 22, 2009 2:55 PM

Thank you Montrose for another wonderful thread.

Posted by: Biff Champion at April 22, 2009 3:08 PM

Familiarity with brick is an inexorable part of growing up and living in Brooklyn. Thanks, Montrose!

Posted by: East New York at April 22, 2009 3:16 PM

Yes, thank you!

Posted by: mopar at April 22, 2009 4:06 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions