« The Argyle Unveiled Co-op of the Day: 135 Hawthorne Street »
March 24, 2009
Last Week's Biggest Sales

1. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS $3,200,000
32 College Place GMAP (left)
A 2,820-square-foot, single-family house, according to Property Shark. Entered into contract on 12/9/08; closed on 2/11/09; deed recorded on 3/20/09.
2. COBBLE HILL $2,300,000
17 Cheever Place GMAP (right)
This 2,488-sf two-family hit the market in June, listed at $2,750,000; the price was subsequently decreased to $2,575,000. The house had been "meticulously gut-renovated to perfection," according to its listing; the sellers bought it for $1,130,000 in early '06. Entered into contract on 11/10/08; closed on 3/6/09; deed recorded on 3/16/09.
3. PROSPECT HEIGHTS $2,000,000
210 Prospect Place GMAP
This 3,633-sf, single-family townhouse was first listed for $2,495,000 last summer; the price was dropped to $2,250,000 in October. As noted in a House of the Day post, its owners gave it an extreme makeover. Entered into contract on 2/5/09; closed on 3/10/09; deed recorded on 3/19/09.
4. PARK SLOPE $1,620,824
520 8th Street GMAP
This 3,000-sf, three-family last sold for $999,999 in late 2007, according to Property Shark. Entered into contract on 3/6/09; closed on 3/6/09; deed recorded on 3/18/09.
5. CARROLL GARDENS $1,575,000
356 President Street GMAP
This 4,500-square-foot house was listed for $1,820,000 when it got House of the Day treatment last November. Entered into contract on 1/19/09; closed on 3/10/09; deed recorded on 3/18/09.
Photos from Property Shark.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/8948
Comments
This is what I like to see...sales entered into contract in 2009, after the stock market took a 40% dive in 2008. Team Bear will come back with statistical analysis saying that this is not a random sample and all that crap.
Reality is, things are selling at prices well above what they have been predicting for over a year now!!!!!!!!
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 11:37 AM
The Park Slope house was purchased 80% through a total gut renovation. The assumed construction contract to finish the house will put it at 1.9 totally minted out.
Posted by: Jebby at March 24, 2009 11:45 AM
20-25% price drops all around.
Keep clapping, DIBS, but I think the bears are winning here.
Posted by: SnarkSlope at March 24, 2009 11:45 AM
again - houses ARE indeed selling and while the prices were reduced from the original ask, the sale price is still VERY hefty!
Posted by: gemini10 at March 24, 2009 11:47 AM
No one prices their house at the proverbial 10% above what they realistically expect to get. These prices are still very encouraging.
I'm off for a lunch meeting...talk among yourselves.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 11:49 AM
Team bear will come on with all their math and their logic and their data... Well to hell with them.
Dave, as a member of "team bear," I am not particularly surprised that last week's biggest four sales were, well, big. And even if these prices go down 10% (resulting in a 50% loss for anyone who puts 20% down), the prices will still be big. This is New York City. Prices are always going to be high. But in a year or two they will be less high then they are now, and right now they are less high than they were six months ago. No amount of exclamation points will argue that away.
Posted by: lechacal at March 24, 2009 11:50 AM
"This is what I like to see...sales entered into contract in 2009, after the stock market took a 40% dive in 2008. Team Bear will come back with statistical analysis saying that this is not a random sample and all that crap."
Eh Retard, What happens when the Bond Market implodes?
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 11:50 AM
No one's getting a brownstone in BH for $800-1,000,000 like what many Team Bear members are hoping for. You will see an uptick in sales in the next Douglas Elliman report because of the low interest rates. The sky is not falling.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 11:55 AM
"No one's getting a brownstone in BH for $800-1,000,000 like what many Team Bear members are hoping for."
Agreed. No way things fall that far.
"You will see an uptick in sales in the next Douglas Elliman report because of the low interest rates."
Quite possibly. But that won't stop prices from continuing to decrease.
"The sky is not falling."
Agreed.
Posted by: lechacal at March 24, 2009 11:57 AM
That College Place sure appears to be a sweet little street.
Posted by: Brooklyn Chicken at March 24, 2009 12:00 PM
Price on Cheever looks very good - considering sq ft price - and that although totally renovated I don't think will win any awards for design nor does it really look that 'highend'. But to be fair I'm only looking at few pics and in person maybe super great.
The President St house on the other hand showS weaker market.
That area previoUsly would sell 3200sq ft'ers (this is over 4000) needing work for $1.6-$1.8. And the pics on this show nice orig detail remains (which is not too frequently the case in CG)
Posted by: Petebklyn at March 24, 2009 12:12 PM
lechacal,
Great to meet you last week. You are still fairly new, here, so, to review: In the crazy world of debate on this site, your outlook puts you in the middle, if not on team bull. Forget normal definitions of bull and bear -- it's been recalibrated here. Bull = modest drops followed by some kind of recovery. Bear = "half off peak comps" and implosion of all relevant markets.
Posted by: slopefarm at March 24, 2009 12:30 PM
The Prospect Heights house is an interesting test case for market forces. While its actual sale price was a 20% reduction from ask, I think the original asking price was ridiculous in the first place. 2 million for a Prospect Heights house is a very high price no matter how you slice it. This is why it is so hard to figure out what percentage price drops we are looking at these days. I said as much back in the original thread about this house, that the price was unrealistic back in July. What are other people's opinions about the sale price of this particular house?
Posted by: wasder at March 24, 2009 12:33 PM
516 8th St. just listed with BHS for $1.995 million: http://www.bhsbrooklyn.com/detail.asp?id=1002646 (no floor plan yet and turgid copy -- "make your day-tooday living sensible and joyous").
Owners paid $1.425 million in 2004 per PShark.
Posted by: babs at March 24, 2009 12:41 PM
The price on that Prospect Heights place is surprising. It seems to suggest prices are still rising in the area.
Posted by: mopar at March 24, 2009 12:45 PM
I also thought the Prospect Heights house was originally priced way too high. I also think 2M for Prospect Heights is a great price.
Posted by: broker at March 24, 2009 12:51 PM
1) As I've said before, things don't fall off a cliff in RE on a dime, esp in NYC where much cash (witness, bonuses last winter) was still in system following Fall 08 crash.
2) Cash will dry up more and more in 2009, hence real declines will show themselves as time goes on
3) These properties suffered price cuts, and then further declines in final cost relative to ask.
4) "Biggest sales" are just that - somewhat of a statistical blip.
Bulls are desperate for good news, but lechacal is right that a glimmer here and there does not reverse the inevitable course of prices moving further downward.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at March 24, 2009 1:00 PM
Folks we're in a multi-year bear housing market! Housing is not like the stock market, which took less than two years to drop 50%. Look at any past housing bubble markets. Plus price drops will be interrupted by brief, smaller increases.
Regarding any headlines on "uptick in sales," look at the more accurate prior-year basis. Of course, Jan/Feb sales are greater than Dec.
Posted by: cjmorris1201 at March 24, 2009 1:08 PM
Bull = modest drops followed by some kind of recovery. Bear = "half off peak comps" and implosion of all relevant markets
I think these definitions are where much of the tension comes from. What is modest? 5%, 10%? If you are talking 20% (which I have heard mentioned before), then there really isn't a huge difference between these two. Rational people expecting a 50% drop would think themselves pretty on target with a 40% final tally and those expecting 20% would be pretty satisifed with their guess if the final number is 25%.
Posted by: Ledbury at March 24, 2009 1:14 PM
HELLO!!!! Prices in NYC have already dropped 40 percent and are dropping further. What are you guys talking about? I just cannot believe how well prices are holding up in....Prospect Heights? This makes no sense.
I don't know what's going on with prices but the job market is extremely grim, monster inflation seems around the corner (see today's news about China championing another currency), and the US government may soon be bankrupt and unable to borrow.
Posted by: mopar at March 24, 2009 1:26 PM
"(see today's news about China championing another currency), and the US government may soon be bankrupt and unable to borrow."
Wow that sounds familiar.. I wonder where I heard that before??
The What (Tick.. Tick... Tick..)
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 1:34 PM
Miss Muffett: Looks like you are still losing money. Keep the faith.
Team BULL
Posted by: sebb at March 24, 2009 1:47 PM
"Mr Zhou said the proposal would require 'extraordinary political vision and courage' and acknowledged a debt to John Maynard Keynes, who made a similar suggestion in the 1940s."
Kinda sounds like we can safely file that under "A" for "Ain't ever gonna happen."
Posted by: SnarkSlope at March 24, 2009 1:54 PM
Yes, Snark...not in our lifetimes. The Euro took 50 years to develop from initial inception. It remains to be seen whether it will weather this storm.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 1:58 PM
The central banker's proposal reflects both China's desire to hold its $1.95 trillion in reserves in something other than U.S. dollars and the fact that Beijing has few alternatives. [But]With more U.S. dollars continuing to pour into China from trade and investment, Beijing has no realistic option other than storing them in U.S. debt.
The sky is not falling
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123780272456212885.html
Posted by: YngRntr at March 24, 2009 1:59 PM
China's economic growth is largely fueled by U.S. consumption. Screwing with us is tantamount to shooting oneself in the head so to treat a migraine.
Posted by: YngRntr at March 24, 2009 2:01 PM
Hi slopefarm, great to meet you as well. I would say I am new here - just that I participate only sporadically and tend to stay away from the socializing on the open thread.
I would summarize my views as follows. Whether this puts me on team bear, bull, or reasonable (with Wasder) is up to you.
- Prices are falling and will continue to do so for some time to come. The downward leg of the market could take a couple of years to resolve itself.
- Recovery to peak levels will take longer than most people think.
- Single family and multi-family properties in prime areas will have a softer landing than other property classes.
- Coops will have a softer landing than condos.
- New condos will get his the hardest. This process is already well underway.
- Those who take pleasure in the misfortune of others are not worthy of my attention. Those who think the brownstone market will collapse and we will end up back in the 1970s are simply mistaken.
Posted by: lechacal at March 24, 2009 2:04 PM
And I mean I would *not* say I am new here. My dear friend Sebb can attest to our many exchanges over the past six months or so.
Posted by: lechacal at March 24, 2009 2:05 PM
Lechacal! Team Reasonable welcomes you!
Posted by: wasder at March 24, 2009 2:09 PM
Lechacal...the only thing i disagree with is that the "downward leg of the market will take a couple of years to resolve itself." I think by the end of this year we will be close to the bottom.
Not sure how long recovery to peak levels will take. There are too many unkowable exogenous economic trends at play right now.
Otherwise, I'm here because I enjoy real estate porn and I like riling up the Team Bear members. I especially like BHO's calculations when he starts with them.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 2:10 PM
Oh Sebb - why do you insist on saying I'm losing money? By having sold before the crash, I made more than I would have had I waited. The modest rent I'm paying now is more than offset (including mortgage deduction) by the price declines my previous property has already suffered, and the declines I am seeing on properties we've looked at. Please don't waste time making nonsensical comments.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at March 24, 2009 2:11 PM
Sebb, on what basis do you say that Miss Muffett is losing money? I think it is almost universally accepted at this point that prices have come down to some extent.
Posted by: lechacal at March 24, 2009 2:13 PM
Dave, you may well be right. As I posted yesterday I am considering jumping in later this year. But I have a long history of acting on my predictions of market trends a bit too early. Now that the price declines are a reality, I have to counsel myself to continue to be patient.
Posted by: lechacal at March 24, 2009 2:16 PM
Given the very reasonable definition of "Team Reasonable", isn't pretty much everyone on "Team Reasonable." Does this mean we can put the whole "team" business aside?
Posted by: Ledbury at March 24, 2009 2:20 PM
Lechacal - also, remember that given how slowly RE moves, you have little to lose by waiting. The days of a sudden, brisk run up are probably behind us for years to come, so that is not a risk. In other words, time is on your side. I too am impatient in that I would love to just buy my new place and be done with it, but there is too much at stake financially now to act precipitously and I really am certain that by waiting, we will get a much better deal. Severl properties we were considering months ago have had several price cuts and are already cheaper now than what we had thought would have been a reasonable price months ago. In fact, "reasonable" values are clearly being re-defined, as is clear by all that's happening in our economy.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at March 24, 2009 2:24 PM
Miss Muffett & Mopar: where are these properties that have suddenly lost tons & tons of value? I have an especially hard time believing: "Prices in NYC have already dropped 40 percent and are dropping further."
I just did a refi on a PS coop & the appraisal came-in $110K OVER my fall 2006 purchase price.
Please, oh please, tell me you're not basing this simply on the asking/sale price differences that are reported here...
I hate to pick a team to side with, but the bulls are certainly throwing around a lot less BS than the bears.
Posted by: parkedslope at March 24, 2009 2:33 PM
Parkedslope: I agree with you that values are in a state of transition, and that's why we are seeing reduced transactions, buyer-seller stalemates, and price cuts. Basically, the selling side (including owners, brokers, and perhaps some of the banks? look at the larger bank-balance sheet stalemate nationally) refuse to believe that values have gone down. Buyers, on the other hand, refuse to buy at prices which have skyrocketed in recent years to unsustainable highs. So, we are seeing things like buyers walking away from large deposits since the expectations are that, with values set to go down more than 10%, buyers will still do better cutting these losses and waiting for price declines. And part of the reason that buyers are waiting on the sidelines is precisely because asking prices have not come down enough, since too many sellers/brokers insist that properties are worth more than what buyers want to pay. The only way to break the cycle is for sellers to cut prices, which the most serious sellers are indeed starting to do, sometimes dramatically. Then sales prices start to go down. This in turn, affects comps, which in turn affects "values". It's a process, and it does not happen quickly so that's why individual properties may still recently have been "valued" relatively high (if that value was based on earlier comps, when values were higher).
Posted by: Miss Muffett at March 24, 2009 2:48 PM
Is that it?? No more discussion?? BHO???? cornerbodega, we haven't heard anything insightful from you lately.???? Did you get shut down for overpricing the milk???
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 2:54 PM
Well, I hope my comment will suffice Dave-in-Bed,
I for one have to say, I'm still floored by the prices everything seems to be selling for.
A girlfriend of mine and her husband recently sold their house they bought in 1980...need I say more?
For those of us who remember "back when", the prices these days are still spectacular. We would never have dreamed of it!
I guess that makes me "Team Bull" although I started "Team Princess" for BRgirl and Nokilissa I think it was...anyway, Team Princess died right out of the gate.
Thanks!
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at March 24, 2009 2:59 PM
"Is that it?? No more discussion?? BHO???? cornerbodega, we haven't heard anything insightful from you lately.???? Did you get shut down for overpricing the milk???"
Nope Assnut, people get tired of auguring with Retards....
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 3:00 PM
Brooklyn Greene - Exactly. Prices ARE still spectacular, and would still be even at 50% off peak. Anyone who bought in 1980, or even before 2001, could say that with confidence, even if/when prices go way down.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at March 24, 2009 3:02 PM
"Nope Assnut, people get tired of auguring with Retards...."
And retards get tired of trying to decipher your poor use of the English language, numbnuts.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 3:03 PM
Team Reasonable. I like that wasder. Too bad I couldn't hang around at Floyd too long last week.
Price cuts from unreasonable asking prices are expected and warranted. If a house doesn't get full asking it doesn't mean that it lost value, it means that it sold for what it's worth in a fair market and was asked too much to begin with.
That's all I have to say. Have to get back to the emails. Peace Out :)
Posted by: Adam Dahill at March 24, 2009 3:05 PM
What, is that what you told your woodshop teacher when he asked why you keep skipping class and hanging out in the computer lab?
Posted by: lechacal at March 24, 2009 3:07 PM
And, I MUST add: that Cobble Hill house with that complete overhaul and no original detail...I can't believe a house with so little curb appeal, what appears to be a chain link fence out front and lousy looking replacement windows (is basically "ugly") would sell for this kind of money. Not that I'm surprised considering the market but 20 years ago who would have thought a house like that from the outside would go for 2 million and somthing?
Every week I continue to be floored by the high sale prices. Even if they are below the asking price and possibly lower than they were last year at this time. The run up was so fast and steep the last 5 years.
We could sell our house for the current asking price of a one-bedrooms in our neighborhood and still walk away with something...of course, we bought our house a good number of years ago...ugh! Time flies....And we don't have many years left to the pay-off date...I wonder what THAT will feel like. H'mmm.
Anyone here finished paying a 30-year mortgage? Benson, NOP, you other old-timers?...you know who you are!!! :-)
People kept telling us to refinance into another 30-year mortgage but I'm kind of glad we didn't/haven't. Are we being dumb not to?
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at March 24, 2009 3:10 PM
While I love real estate porn as much as any reader here, I would like to see more info about properties in the real world that most of us non-bonus-pool NY'ers live in. How about a new feature: "Best deals of the Week"?
Posted by: StJacques at March 24, 2009 3:15 PM
I agree Coquille St. Jacques. That would be a great idea. I'm sure there are cheap (although rather dreadful and depressing) good deals out there.
I would imagine the Best Deals are in areas that may be next decade's most exciting neighborhood.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at March 24, 2009 3:18 PM
I agree StJacques.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 3:19 PM
Couldn't stay away. I know the Jersey Phobia, but there are awesome deals this side of the Hudson. Neighborhood is still a little gritty with a mix of artists, yuppies, old-timers, gays, thugs, hipsters, frat-boys, young families.
Lot's of great properties downtown and lower price points.
But that's Jersey City for ya..... Cue Jersey Bashing :)
Posted by: Adam Dahill at March 24, 2009 3:24 PM
Is it just me or has 8th street seen a ton of sales lately?
Posted by: Rookie at March 24, 2009 3:29 PM
Ok- before everyone jumps on me: maybe a "ton" is too strong a word. How about "more than it's fair share."
Posted by: Rookie at March 24, 2009 3:31 PM
True, BrooklynGreene, some of the best deals (and most interesting properties) are in places that might well be next decade's most interesting neighborhoods, but some are in more conventional areas too. Some people (like our fellow reader 11217 - see last week's thread on the house on Decatur St) might think the house that my wife and I just closed on in Stuyvesant Heights is in some kind of ghetto, but we are thrilled. We searched hard for well over a year, so we think we're well informed, and we think we got a very good buy. A good deal does not have to be dreadful or depressing!
Posted by: StJacques at March 24, 2009 3:33 PM
How about houses that sold in Bed Stuy, Clinton Hill and Fort Greene?????? Brownstoner has waxed over this little diddy. Where are the sales is these areas???
Hey Adam I see the government is getting ready to open the credit spigots again.
Mortgage Lending to Jump to $2.78 Trillion in 2009 (Update1)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=agU1rGf2C700&refer=us
March 24 (Bloomberg) -- The Mortgage Bankers Association boosted its forecast for 2009 home-loan originations by $800 billion to $2.78 trillion as a wave of refinancing and low interest rates spur homeowners to seek out new loans.
Get ready for 4.00 gas again and the Chinese telling us to "go fuk" ourselves. You gotta love America...
The What (Tick.. Tick.. Tick..)
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 3:33 PM
Lechacal, I agree 100 percent with all the points you posted. So does that make us Team Bear, Bull, or something else?
Parkedslope, prices have dropped 40 percent from the June 2006 peak in subprime areas of New York, such as Bushwick and East New York. They seem to be holding up pretty well in prime areas such as Park Slope and Brooklyn Heights.
Posted by: mopar at March 24, 2009 3:37 PM
come on.... "auguring with retards?" shop class? I thought it was kind of funny. (yes it's auger, not augur). nobody appreciates my lame attempts at humor.
Posted by: lechacal at March 24, 2009 3:38 PM
What - in all seriousness, what does all this mean? How does mortgage lending up = $4 gas = China cutting off US investment?
And why would China sabotage its biggest market & the place it's been investing in for a decade?
Posted by: parkedslope at March 24, 2009 3:40 PM
Don't expect an answer, parkedslope.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 3:43 PM
St Jacques, congrats! That's a beautiful area. Seems this year everyone's always buying in Bed Stuy or Park Slope.
Posted by: mopar at March 24, 2009 3:44 PM
Yup, What, you and I are in agreement. Just more of the same! I'm very nervous.
Posted by: mopar at March 24, 2009 3:45 PM
The Return of the "What" aside,
I'm so happy for you Coquille! I'm sorry. I should not have written that good deals are dreadful or depressing (I think I'm sounding more and more like my mother or even grandmother--ugh!!!). I'm sure there many good prices on great houses in Bed Stuy right now. In terms of houses nearer in to downtown and more transportation, anything one would call "a deal" is probably going to need a lot of rehabbing.
By the way Mr. ROTW, there is so few house ever changing hands in Fort Greene, that I don't think you can say Jonathan (et al) is avoiding listing them. And, it seems this site does make a point of listing FG houses when they sell if they happen to be on the top sales of the week, which they have I might add.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at March 24, 2009 3:46 PM
Hey, jackal, if that's your idea of a joke, it doesn't augur well for future posts.
Posted by: slopefarm at March 24, 2009 3:48 PM
"And why would China sabotage its biggest market & the place it's been investing in for a decade?"
Because China knows the US is on life support and will default on it's Bond obligations. China can to contend will rising unemployment and dwindling resources at home. They will liquidate their holding of US debt as soon we start this Quantitative Easing nonsense.
Quantitative easing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing
The term quantitative easing refers to the creation of a pre-determined quantity of new money 'out of thin air'[1] through open market operations by a central bank as the start of a process to increase the money supply. It can, more simply, be understood as an indirect method of printing money. This new money is injected into the private banking system when the accounts of the vendors of the securities purchased by the central bank through the open market operations are credited.
Creating money when money is already loose (i.e. when the prices of the assets to be purchased are too high, as might occur if quantitative easing is continued too long) or purchasing assets which will lose their value during inflation (e.g. treasury bonds) tends to devalue the currency. Since quantitative easing risks devaluing the currency, quantitative easing has been proposed while currencies are experiencing deflation. Continuing quantitative easing runs the risk of inflation.
Say Buh Bye to your asset prices. Mopar i'm glad you are starting to understand the risks, good for you....
The What (Grape Skittles)
Someday this war is gonna end..
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 3:52 PM
I love it when this Assnut cuts and pastes economic jargon as a pseudo answer for something that he has pulled out of his ass.
It's like listening to a combination of Ann Coulter, Pat Buchanan, McLaughlin and Homer Simpson all rolled into one.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 3:56 PM
"By the way Mr. ROTW, there is so few house ever changing hands in Fort Greene, that I don't think you can say Jonathan (et al) is avoiding listing them."
Oh yes they are changing hands Dumbass! You see those house do not fit the Mind F*** of Brownstoner. It does not fit withing the Mutant Asset Bubble and guess what?? How many retards can afford these prices?? *** Crickets****, I thought so...
"And, it seems this site does make a point of listing FG houses when they sell if they happen to be on the top sales of the week, which they have I might add."
On universal truth is MATH! Math does not lie and it's very very straight forward. If you have declining income, you cannot have rising prices!!!!
The What
Someday these retards are gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 3:58 PM
Quiz time, kiddies!
Who is the author of the following statement:
"On [sic] universal truth is MATH! Math does not lie and it's very very straight forward."
a) John Nash (schizophrenic subject of 'A Beautiful Mind')
b) the What
The Answer, tomorrow!
Posted by: parkedslope at March 24, 2009 4:03 PM
"I love it when this Assnut cuts and pastes economic jargon as a pseudo answer for something that he has pulled out of his ass."
Then refute it Dave! Why is the government "printing" money to buy long term debt???!!
Here one Asssniffer! They do not want a failed auction! If that happens the Bond market implodes immediately! You want to see 14%+ Rates???!!! This is why China is going nut right now with the talk of a "New Currency"! For a person who has been to Chine you are one stupid Mother F*** Dave. I'm glad we don't meet face to face, I would need a barfbag just to stand next to you...
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 4:04 PM
ROTW,
The thread is the weeks' biggest sales -- i.e., the properties that sold for the most money. It's not a cover up if he doesn't post sales that are not within the criteria. If you know of sales in Ft. Greene that show greater market weakness, why don't you post the address and sale price info?
Posted by: slopefarm at March 24, 2009 4:06 PM
Quiz time, kiddies!
Who blows stay dogs in park slope and hump trees buck naked??
a) Dave in Bed Stuy
b) parkedslope
c) DIBS humps parkedslope
The Answer, tomorrow!
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 4:07 PM
The new currency talk is just political rhetoric. It's kinda like listening to you rant here and knowing that its just ranting for the sake of ranting.
Please, keep the references to your mother out of the discussions.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 4:10 PM
Do you always run out of meds towards the end of the month???
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 4:15 PM
"Do you always run out of meds towards the end of the month???"
Refute Dave, Refute!!!!
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 4:27 PM
I think the only shoes left to drop are really some of the Eastern European currencies. It'll be like the last Russian crisis though, a big yawn.
What, I take my meds every day. That's why I'm always such a joy to converse with.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at March 24, 2009 4:32 PM
"Refute Dave, Refute!!!!"
Here that, everyone, what is calling for help to refute Dave. Seems like a concession to me. For want of a comma, an argument was lost.
What, nothing personal, but your grammar has been atrocious today. Btw, what are stay dogs and hump trees?
Posted by: slopefarm at March 24, 2009 4:34 PM
This is usually where, out of a sensitivity to (feelings about) my age and some sense of propriety, I leave the conversation, but I'll point out that "stay dogs" are those cast iron dogs figures you use to keep doors from slamming closed from wind. They are also moulded as little piglets and rabbits...you don't want to stub your toe on one!
And hump trees are those planted on Wednesdays.
Terrible humour. Sorry!
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at March 24, 2009 4:50 PM
'stay dogs' are dogs that listen to you when you say 'stay!'
and then you hump them...
Posted by: parkedslope at March 24, 2009 4:52 PM
Slopefarm the retards time is short. You can do whatever you want. You can use my grammar as a issue but at the end of the day. The Mutant Asset Bubble is over...
"I think the only shoes left to drop are really some of the Eastern European currencies. It'll be like the last Russian crisis though, a big yawn."
I hope you are right Dave because that is a ticking nuclear bomb...
The What
Someday this war is gonna end..
Posted by: Return of The What at March 24, 2009 4:55 PM
Mr. ROTW,
The housing bubble has burst. What's the big news? People were pointing this out five years ago if they had any sense. The bubble kept inflating and then POP.
We don't care if our houses will be worth pennies on the dollar by Christmas. We'll all be starving then while society breaks down.
Are you on a crusade to save Brownstone Brooklyn's humanity and to wake us up to the fact that there is a world financial/social crisis?
Look, it has been going on for a long, long time.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at March 24, 2009 5:10 PM
Not sure what team I should be on -
Values will fall approx 50% from the peak (but maybe less if only because rampant inflation will result in higher nominal numbers)
BUT.....It will take years(3-5) and it will effect ALL housing classes similarly - except for the immediate effect of a large supply of new construction being put online, there is no significant difference between the generic coop and condo - except perhaps for some nicer finishes - which are easily overcome by a Condo's easier transferability.
And over the longer term, there will be no significant difference between very large apartments (coop & Condo) vs the average brownstone.
Additionally, as long as crime stays down (which is NOT a function of the economy but of policing and people) Brooklyn (and NY as a whole) will never see prices fall to the levels we saw in the 70's - it is just a different city in terms of desirability and options (suburban expansion is already mostly done)
As for the default of the U.S. itself - please - the Chinese have ZERO choice but buy our debt - there leaders face far more risk trying to send their workers back to some 5 sq ft of land they call a farm - then they do losing some capital by us devaluing our dollar.
The world is not coming to an end - but getting rich by doing nothing but following the herd hopefully is
Posted by: fsrg at March 24, 2009 5:32 PM
Alot of first time buyers are looking at Bedstuy and Bushwick again, but this time they are lowballing and looking for foreclosures and short sells.
I speak to at least one person today that wants to buy and rehab in those neighborhoods. They see the potential and can't afford the prime areas and are convinced as first time buyers that they well never get into a prime property in the slope/heights/hill/gardens/greene etc....
There are opportunities in subprime Brooklyn and you will see the beat up multi-fams get snatched up when they hit around 300k for a 4 floor.
Mopar- Do you concur?
Posted by: Adam Dahill at March 24, 2009 5:50 PM
Dave --Aren't the various parties suggesting a basket of existing currencies as the international reserve currency, to replace the dollar? The world went off pound sterling; Nixon shut the gold window in one swoop, on a Sunday night. Not sure why the dollar couldn't be replaced.
I think we're dancing around the central issue: Will the Geithner plan work? It may in the short run, and then the bulls will hosannah like there's no tomorrow. but as Geithner made clear today, there is no Plan B, and many v smart people think this is a kiss-off to the value of the dollar.
Also: If the Chinese have no choice but to buy our bonds, why is the Fed publicly committed to buying the long end of the curve?
I keep thinking of the line from Princess Bride: I do not think that word (Impossible) means what you think it means.
Posted by: Whuh at March 24, 2009 7:20 PM
Vinnie- FHA loans are still doing 3.5% down and they raised their limits back to 2008 levels.
1 unit: $729,750
2 unit: $934,200
3 unit: $1,129,250
4 unit: $1,403,400
FHA loans are more costly but if you don't have a choice they are still an option. FHA includes section 203(k) loans that allow you to finance repair costs.
Fannie/Freddie are also adopting those loan limits and they should be available within the next week or so. They won't do 3.5% down but you will be able to 20% down to those limits.
Posted by: Adam Dahill at March 24, 2009 7:28 PM
I've found so much that I agree with on this thread that I can scarcely contain myself - I'll also take another rare dip into the comment pool and even try to be a little provocative (hopefully in a constructive way).
I think Lechacal @ 2:04 PM largely nailed it, my only addition is that I think many of the other-than-"prime" neighborhoods (I'll let others have the argument over what that term means) are going to take serious (not "modest") price hits over the next 12-18 months as the economy continues to stagnate.
First the inventory in those neighborhoods is growing and will continue to grow. As The What correctly (I think his substance is often right) observed up above, inventory in many neighborhoods simply isn't moving right now. Second, the prices in those neighborhoods will fall. The declines won't seem dramatic relative to value but they will sure seem dramatic measured against the peak of the silliness of Summer 2006.
I also think The What is not all wrong when he suggests, as he often has, that economic distress-driven crime in some of those neighborhoods might compound the price declines (something none of us can pretend to know for sure, but at a minimum it isn't an unreasonable hypothesis).
So, my big add-on to Lechacal's point is that I think some neighborhoods are in for a big near-term hit. What look like bargains today in those neighborhoods might feel like "falling knives" in another year . . . but will probably turn out fine for a buyer who's time horizon is longer term. But I think caveat emptor would be the rule if I was looking anytime this year.
Finally, in all seriousness, Mr. B., one multimillionaire in Brooklyn Heights selling his mansion to another multimillionaire doesn't really say much about the "real" state of the market. At best it's misleading, at worst - under the current circumstances of most people in this city - it almost feels distasteful. I fully agree with those lobbying for a "Best Deals of the Week" feature.
Posted by: ajaxclorox at March 24, 2009 7:36 PM
Lechacal for the 100th time we cannot help but agree with you.
Not sure what some folks are cheering about given the massive reductions some of these homes have required to sell i.e $300 to $500K. Remember in that distant year of 2006 these would have sold at or above asking...oh well let lying dogs lye...Denial never ceases to amaze us.
DIBS did you actually read the sales price in relation to asking? Remember these are the biggest sales in Brooklyn's best areas and they've still required significant price cuts in the 20-25% range. Do you think a sample of mid-range to poor neighborhood sales will reflect less declines in prices? Absolutely not dude! In fact we know the general range is 35% to 40% off peak prices in BS & Bushwick...can provide data but your first comment makes it seem as if you don't believe in data anymore....surprising for a Hedge-fund manager.
Snark we were thinking the same thing when we read DIBS comment. "20-25% price drops all around.
Keep clapping, DIBS, but I think the bears are winning here".
"Miss Muffett: Looks like you are still losing money. Keep the faith".
Sebb can you please explain what you mean by the above statement? Are we missing something else you seem to know? Or was that just a pediatric jest on your part. Her explanations and reasoning makes a lot of sense and not only to her individual situation but also that of most logical people....
NB: Idiosyncrasies are always forgiven if indeed you happen to be an adult.
Posted by: pierre de taille at March 24, 2009 8:05 PM
pierre de taille: What i have been saying all along is that she keeps siting on the sidelines waiting and waiting. With her finger up her A$$ but guess what prices are not going down in brownstone Bklyn. Look at the selling prices.
Plus add in the tax savings and the rent she keeps throwing away. Okay Buddy.
Posted by: sebb at March 24, 2009 8:51 PM
But Sebb, what you don't get - and I can't fathom why not, other than you don't *want* to get it since you are in such deep denial - is that by waiting, I'm **saving** money. And lots of it. There was a house that we were interested in last fall that came on the market at what we thought was a high price. We offered 20% below, and the owner would not deign to counter-offer. But since then, not only have they begged us to buy at our original low offer, but they have reduced the price several times, and we now hear the owner is considering an offer way below what we offered. Because the house needs so much work, and because we've lowered our budget period (due to losses in our retirement and college savings, which now need injections from our "house cash") we no longer want this particular house. But had we still been interested, then by now, this house would be hundreds of thousands of dollars less than what we would have been required to pay mere months ago. That said, this house is the exception, not the rule, as the seller is clearly motivated, whereas many sellers right now seem to be in denial (perhaps they are like you).
But with every week that passes, I see more properties getting price cuts - although so far, we have not found anything we love at a price we think makes sense. Given that the market is only going down further, we are convinced that we have nothing to lose, and everything to gain, by being patient and waiting. For the hundredth time, the rent and tax savings we are "throwing out the window" are dwarfed by the price cuts we are only starting to see and that we will continue to see. Even if we spend 100-200K on rent/"lost" tax savings, we will surely save much more than that for the kinds of properties we are looking at.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at March 24, 2009 9:20 PM
P.S. Sebb - the house I was referring to was in prime Brownstone Brooklyn, as are the other properties I'm seeing price cuts on. You must have blinders on not to see this starting to happen or to think that it won't continue.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at March 24, 2009 9:22 PM
I don't know Muffett, but i have seen a lot of houses sell for asking close to it or even above the prices in the last 2 months. Unless you have been living in a hole with a groundhog not looking , then you must agree.
If you tell me i am wrong i will give you all of the evidence tomm as i am very tired.
Posted by: sebb at March 24, 2009 9:29 PM
Sebb - all we need is ONE house and we are sure we will find it at a big discount sometime in the not-too-distant future, but if it takes 1-2 years, that's fine by us too. Your assertions are as gravity defying as the prices of the last few years, and you are in a crowd of one, it seems. Even the bullest of the bulls on this are resigned to significant price cuts. I too could regale you with a huge list of homes that have had price cuts lately. I wish you luck.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at March 24, 2009 9:34 PM
Dear Team Bear and Team Bull,
You can pontificate all you like. The nuances you are debating are meaningless. Real estate prices are in the toilet, the economy is in the toilet. Get ready to grow potatoes in your backyard. 35% loss in RE values btw '88 and '93, and no one even remembers that teeny blip on the economic radar. This is so much worse. We ain't seen nothing yet. The What was right all along.
Yours truly,
The spirit of 1929
Posted by: 1929 at March 24, 2009 11:44 PM
"They are convinced as first time buyers that they well never get into a prime property in the slope/heights/hill/gardens/greene etc...."
We certainly feel this way. We can never afford more than $200,000 per person/$300,000 for the two of us/$500,000 for a two-family/$600,000 for a three-family. The only areas that might slip into our price range are Greenwood or Stuyvesant Heights.
We're lucky, though, because Bushwick is our first choice. We don't want to live in "prime" Brooklyn.
"There are opportunities in subprime Brooklyn and you will see the beat up multi-fams get snatched up when they hit around 300k for a 4 floor."
Prices are already pretty good. It's not entirely a question of price. People have to believe in the area, rental demand must be steady, and they must also have income they can count on. Another issue is that many of these places are wrecks.
I saw a three-family the other day in excellent condition in a great location for $620,000. At that price, you could practically live rent free. I am not sure but I think I saw the same place listed again for more money. (Not swift.) I'm starting to see listings for two-families in the 300s. They need work, but at that price, you could take out an 203K loan and gut the place and still come in under current market price. Most of the places I see are in terrible condition. If people are looking for original detail, as I am, or they don't have the cash for repairs, that's a problem.
Posted by: mopar at March 25, 2009 12:15 AM
1929, I'm desperately trying to buy a place so I'll have a backyard to grow potatoes in when the apocalpyse comes. (Any minute now.)
Posted by: mopar at March 25, 2009 12:19 AM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.