« The Prime Meats Drumroll Continues Open House Picks: Six Months Later »
February 6, 2009
147 South Oxford #3C Sells for 7 Percent Under Ask

This is an interesting gauge of the market: A beautifully presented prewar two-bedroom at 147 South Oxford Street in Fort Greene hit the market in October with a price tag of $525,000. We called the asking price "reasonable" at the time, so we weren't surprised that it sold relatively quickly. The sale price of $487,000 was a couple of bucks short of what we thought, but we happen to know that the owner was eager to get a deal done so she probably didn't want to dawdle over ten grand, which is a wise move in this market. Take the money and run.
Co-op of the Day: 147 South Oxford Street, #3C [Brownstoner] GMAP P*Shark
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/8299
Comments
haha
I said this would get chopped 100k. I was off by 62k but whatevs.
Posted by: Santa at February 6, 2009 11:37 AM
Ha ha ha. Team Bull still holding up for now.
Posted by: mopar at February 6, 2009 11:44 AM
hard to say whether this is bull or bear territory really...
Posted by: wasder at February 6, 2009 12:02 PM
It's a nice apartment, but small. I think this is a 2007/2008 selling price, not a 2009 one. Whoever bought it will be gnashing his/her teeth six months from now.
Posted by: zuleika at February 6, 2009 12:17 PM
A small score for the bears I would think. Or a score for small bears. Go Team Panda Bear.
Posted by: 2br_or_bust at February 6, 2009 12:22 PM
No matter your viewpoint, how can you say that something that goes for under ask is bullish? Especially if the price tag was considered "reasonable" at the time?
Posted by: JIPS at February 6, 2009 12:41 PM
I take back my comment. You're right, I was thinking of the discount off ask, which is meaningless.
So the price is flat compared to last year? Actually, then, this price is still pretty good. I mean, the apt is still holding its value surprisingly well considering the top of the market was 2006 even in New York City.
I saw a couple of apts like this in Fort Greene in 2004 for about $300,000 and I thought they sucked (and so I moved to Jackson Heights). Then again, maybe this one was nicer than those.
Posted by: mopar at February 6, 2009 12:43 PM
Bedrooms in this one were pretty small. And no outdoor space?
Posted by: RaginCajun at February 6, 2009 2:39 PM
I'm supposed to be officially "retired" from posting (self-imposed, need to focus on other things) but I can't let the comment stand that 2006 was top of market in NYC. We were seriously considering selling our apartment from 2005-2008 (when we finally did sell) and we had the place priced by brokers at different moments during that time. The value steadily climbed up, reaching an absolute peak in late 2007. We finally sold in early 2008, pricing it below the 2007 value but generating enough interest that we got a bidding war above ask (and above the 2007 price estimate). In my view, late 07/early 08 was the peak. Bear Sterns was the beginning of the end, though things held value up until Lehman, when at last things really started to drop off a cliff, though obstinate sellers (and some optimistic buyers) still have been buying even through the fall. Now that the bonuses will at last dry up, and a culture of restraint will be imposed on many others (even those who don't make bonuses), things will really start to change.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 6, 2009 3:04 PM
Meant to say obstinate sellers and optimistic buyers helped support prices through this past fall.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 6, 2009 3:07 PM
Miss Muffet!!
I AGREE with you!!! The top of the market here did in fact seem to be late 2007/early 2008. Definitely NOT 2006.
Totally agree.
I think actually (at least in Park Slope) prices seem to be hovering around 2006 levels right now in fact, probably to drop to around 2003/4 by the time all is said and done.
Posted by: 11217 at February 6, 2009 3:15 PM
I think prices will drop slightly in the blue-chip neighborhoods (the real boundaries of said neighborhoods)but they will get hammered in the dicier areas, no matter how cool and trendy last year.
Posted by: sam at February 6, 2009 3:20 PM
Miss Muffet, 11217, the mid-2006 peak was a published peak based on some average for home sale prices in New York City that appeared here on Brownstoner. I don't know where you were selling, but FYI out in subprime land where I live the peak was definitely mid-2006, and in any case that was also the peak for all five boroughs taken together.
Mileage in individual neighborhoods will vary. (Like for example the one where I sold my coop...)
But thank you for coming out of retirement. Getting much work done?
Posted by: mopar at February 6, 2009 3:42 PM
"Meant to say obstinate sellers and optimistic buyers helped support prices through this past fall."
Miss Muffet, you make it sound as though you think prices exist *independently* of buyers and sellers...
Posted by: mopar at February 6, 2009 3:44 PM
Yes, I'm working very hard. I'm a bit worried about falling off the wagon (slippery slope) so will try to stop here. I must confess, I still read Bstoner every day but I've restrained myself from posting and joining the discussions even when it's been very tempting. It's actually pretty liberating to instead focus on my work! Cheers to all...
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 6, 2009 3:45 PM
OK, OK, last post - mopar, I just meant that the psychology of buyers/sellers takes a while to shift. The market held up quite well even after Bear Sterns collapsed, less so after Lehman, and this is going to be the really bad year (which I actually find scary). My point is that classic boom and bust cycles show a period when there is a turning point in psychology and that's when obstinate sellers and optimistic buyers will likely shift to resigned sellers and pessimistic/opportunistic buyers (that is, buyers who will be much more resistant to buying unless a significantly lowered price creates a feeling of opportunity).
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 6, 2009 3:49 PM
Miss Muffet is good to see you back (I really mean that). Don''t let the retards get you down!
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at February 6, 2009 3:58 PM
Miss Muffet, I am neither Team Bear nor Bull but these buyers and sellers sure are TAKING THEIR SWEET TIME.
Posted by: mopar at February 6, 2009 4:37 PM
Well, mopar, that's what happens as the market turns - transactions go down/get slower, etc. until the new psychology snaps into place and overtakes both sellers (who finally lower their prices) and buyers (who finally jump back in). OK, enough! (see how darn addictive this is!)
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 6, 2009 4:42 PM
Well, mopar, that's what happens as the market turns - transactions go down/get slower, etc. until the new psychology snaps into place and overtakes both sellers (who finally lower their prices) and buyers (who finally jump back in). OK, enough! (see how darn addictive this is!)
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 6, 2009 4:52 PM
I have a prediction.
By the time prices fall to any significant degree (more than 20 percent) in "prime" areas, interest rates will be so high the buyers will get no bargain.
Anyone holding out for a townhouse in a nicer neighborhood than they can currently afford will be screwed.
So does that make me Team Bear or Bull?
Posted by: mopar at February 6, 2009 5:56 PM
mopar, i think that makes you team bull.....
Posted by: slick at February 6, 2009 6:16 PM
Hm.....
Posted by: mopar at February 6, 2009 6:23 PM
Don't forget cash-flush buyers who are sitting on the sidelines, who are less affected by interest rates, but are waiting to get better value with their cash.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 6, 2009 8:22 PM
Buyers who can put down all cash? Hm...that would be a lot of cash. But good point, Miss Muffett.
Posted by: mopar at February 6, 2009 11:41 PM
Well, there are some folks out there (and a few on this list), who sold at the height and are renting, so are sitting on yes, lots of cash. These rare people are surely the exception, not the rule, so are not going to prop up the market. Also, since they probably foresaw the meltdown and are cautious with their money, they are probably more likely to wait before buying anytime soon - really, the news gets clearer day by day that NYC prices have a lot further down to go.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 7, 2009 3:05 PM
We sold at the height, we are renting, have cash, are looking for a place to buy.
Posted by: mopar at February 8, 2009 11:35 AM
Can anyone work out a set of numbers for present scenario and future scenario where prices have dropped 20% and interest rates are at 8%? What is the monthly outlay, tax benefits, etc. in both situations. How much does the buyer have to shell out each month in both scenarios? I'm thinking it's a wash at this point. Buy and hold your real estate. Market timers usually lose.
Posted by: Springs at February 8, 2009 9:00 PM
Market timers with cash win.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at February 8, 2009 11:27 PM
Springs, all you have to do is plug numbers into the corcoran.com mortgage calculator. Just a small uptick in mortgage rates makes a large drop in price more expensive.
Posted by: mopar at February 10, 2009 6:06 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.