« Carroll Gardens Atrocity Finally Gets Price Cut High Hopes for Hoyt Street? »

January 9, 2009

Horror Show Friday

horror-show-friday-010909.jpg
These two beauties come to us from Crown Heights and Canarsie, respectively. It almost looks like they could have been designed by the same person. Love those doors and peaked roofs!
Condos in Crown Heights [Craigslist]
1280 E 100th St [Craigslist]




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/7888

Comments

you're so mean mr. b. ahah.

there's nothing wrong with the one on the right. yeah MAYBE you can the utility meters on the outside of the house, but that's a law now with new construction, no? and like i said earlier, you can just stick a nice cozy over that and all is right with the world.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at January 9, 2009 10:49 AM

PLEASE, I haven't had my lunch yet. Is that benson entering the first place there???

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at January 9, 2009 10:50 AM

rob...no one makes covers large enough for these houses.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at January 9, 2009 10:54 AM

Somewhere, in the vastness, there is a warehouse stocking these doors, railings, faux bricks, and probably interior everything. They all shop there.

That said, the one on the left at least has windows larger than postage stamps on all floors. Actually, with a little tweaking, these could look good. Switch out those stupid peaked porticos to something more period appropriate with the Palladian windows, which are the strongest feature to the house. Ditto on the doors - do a painted solid wood door, echoing a simple, early 18th century entrance - think Greenwich Village or Bklyn Hts Federal here. Box in the meters, make them visually disappear. Change the railings, they are so flimsy and cheap looking, get something more substantial, but not fussy. I don't like the peaked roofline, but if it's

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 10:59 AM

Somewhere, in the vastness, there is a warehouse stocking these doors, railings, faux bricks, and probably interior everything. They all shop there.

That said, the one on the left at least has windows larger than postage stamps on all floors. Actually, with a little tweaking, these could look good. Switch out those stupid peaked porticos to something more period appropriate with the Palladian windows, which are the strongest feature to the house. Ditto on the doors - do a painted solid wood door, echoing a simple, early 18th century entrance - think Greenwich Village or Bklyn Hts Federal here. Box in the meters, make them visually disappear. Change the railings, they are so flimsy and cheap looking, get something more substantial, but not fussy. I don't like the peaked roofline, but if it's

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 10:59 AM

What's wrong with them?
They're BOOTIFUL!!!

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 11:01 AM

Damn cat, sorry.

As I was saying, if the interior uses the extra space under the roofline, I can live with it.

There is no hope for the one on the right, which looks like they used whatever is left, from the same vast warehouse.

Benson, where are you? :)

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 11:01 AM

MM...I think you've lost it. Not only are you double posting but I think you're actually serious about the "salvagability" of these two horrors.

And, you didn't complet your last sentence.

Please tell us that you were just so shocked by these horrifying pictures that you're suffering from some temporary insanity. :)

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at January 9, 2009 11:03 AM

And you're blaming it on the cat????

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at January 9, 2009 11:05 AM

Wow two ugly houses in a sea of ugly houses

Posted by: fsrg at January 9, 2009 11:05 AM

I'd also get rid of the balconies. Useless.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 11:06 AM

Wow, where does one start? How about the shower stall in 1280 E 100th St with no walls? I suppose that's one way to clean the bathroom and have a shower at the same time.

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 11:11 AM

"Benson, where are you? :)"

Benson is busy in his vast warehouse, filling orders.
-9 Scholck Doors
- 7 Fedder units
- 5 Schlock railings
- 3 exposed electric meters
- 10,000 faux bricks
Deliver to: Brooklyn, USA

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 11:12 AM

MM blamed it on the cat. evil of her, no?

However I will take full responsibility for saying I do agree. the one on the left could be made to look better, although the entryways would have been bettered centers or each Flush left or right. But MM has years in the design business (as I) and there's a lot that could be done to improve those buildings. that's not saying they're going to win any awards, but they don't have to be so gacky.

The one on the right totally defeats me. It has no redeeming visual qualities whatsoever. Maybe someone could design a slipcover to throw over it. maybe a sinkhole will open up under it.

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 11:13 AM

BRG, you forgot about the "gorgeous floors that smile back"

Posted by: bowl of dicks at January 9, 2009 11:14 AM

Dave, I'm pragmatic in 2009. They built the damn things, I'm just trying to envision what could be done to make the one on the left less of an eyesore. The one on the right is hopeless. Are windows so expensive that they couldn't plan for bigger ones? Of course not. If I was building for this market, I'd try harder to at least make them make sense, I'm not even talking attractive, here. Natural light makes sense.

My cat is jealous of my keyboard, as it takes away time that should be used to pet him. His foot has unerring accuracy in the keys he steps on. Sometimes I think he can read.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 11:15 AM

Bowl...all the interior specs go out with the next order.

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 11:17 AM

In the CH listing, "These beautiful Condos, bring you the best of what Crown Heights could deliver."

Montrose, thems is fightin' words!

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 11:19 AM

"in the best and quite Location in Crown Heights."

"These beautiful Condos, bring you the best of what Crown Heights could deliver."


NOT!!!!!!!(quite)


Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 11:19 AM

"What's wrong with them?
They're BOOTIFUL!!!"

BRG;

As a Bay Ridgite,you should know better as to how to say this.

Allow me, a native Brooklynite,to assess these homes in the mother tongue:

"They're beeee -yeeewwww- ti-full"

And I certainly agree!!!

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 11:29 AM

i dont get the point of this thread every friday. it literally is the same comments everytime. and it's the same type of house posted everytime. i mean we get it. these houses are too low-brow for your classical high tastes. fine. maybe show a different kind of horror show once in a while then? mix it up a bit. hating on these is getting stale and truth be told i've seen some townhouses and brownstone propers that are just as and if not more fuggo.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at January 9, 2009 11:31 AM

Doesnt' Daniel, the broker for the CH condos, look a bit like Michael Corleone in "The Godfather?"

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at January 9, 2009 11:31 AM

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the weird bathroom thing in the house on 100th st. What is that thing in the corner? A litter pan?

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 11:32 AM

Yeah, these posts get boring quickly...bring us the Mill Basin listings.
Can I post an apt. I found on here or should I do it in the Open Thread?

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 11:35 AM

bxgrl...it's a corner shower stall base without the glass enclosure.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at January 9, 2009 11:35 AM

The pragmatic, "it's there now, how could it be made better" is great approach/way to think about things at this stage in the game for a given property.

As an individual buyer for one of the units, it'd be hard to do anything. One nice door and better handrails would be good if you could avoid seeing the bigger picture. You'd have to convince the other 2 new owners to replace their doors and had rails too. Covering the meters could be cheap enough to do by yourself, and add a great deal of visual value (ironically by subtracting an eyesore).

hmmm

Posted by: 7foundry at January 9, 2009 11:36 AM

BRG- you may have to do it on the forum. Hurry!! We want to see it and become evil....oh wait- we're already evil.Ok- more evil!

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 11:46 AM

"hating on these is getting stale and truth be told i've seen some townhouses and brownstone propers that are just as and if not more fuggo."

Rob, I suppose it's cathartic in these tough times and actually can give posters a chance to suggest ways to enhance these places if one so desires, as 7foundry did above. Further, maybe the brokers will actually see these comments and find ways to improve their listings. You can always skip over it, just like most people seem to do with the Inside Third and Bond feature. :-)

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 11:53 AM

Ouch, Biff.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at January 9, 2009 11:55 AM

Not to mention, some of us actually feel a sense of love and nostalgia for these places in the sense we can compare them to places we knew growing up. The interiors and design of these homes is unfortunately much closer to the taste of my parents than the more upscale, historical homes featured on this blog. I've at times playfully compared some of the more hideous elements to my own childhood home.

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 11:56 AM

simply stunning. these beauties remind me of some of Le Corbusier's earlier work.

Posted by: werner at January 9, 2009 11:59 AM

Does anyone have any contacts at HGTV or Bravo? This feature is really screaming for a new makeover show --with a hunky architect and crew -- like "Curb Appeal" but urban. Really, if any of these buildings were in a great location, it would not cost that much to make the exteriors acceptable at minimum and even very cool.

And yes, thes houses look like where I grew up too.

Posted by: BH76 at January 9, 2009 12:01 PM

funny- I was getting a Mondrianish vibe myself.

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 12:02 PM

Biff- I'm shocked (shocked!) to learn that someone of your refined aesthetic tastes and love of historical houses grew up in one of these Mr. Blanding Builds His Scream House structures. We won't talk about my parents architectural tastes- I adored them but I can't bring myself to go there right now :-)

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 12:06 PM

Dave, he could be Brad Pitt, himself, and he'd have a hard time selling these houses. Midwood and Albany is hardly the best part of Crown Heights, and may actually be in Flatbush proper. If not, it's certainly on the fringes of CH South/PLG.

Speaking of Brad Pitt, it would behoove builders everwhere to see what he and his group of architects, builders, and funders are doing in the 9th Ward of New Orleans. They did RESEARCH! before running in to rebuild. They discovered that the classic shotgun cottage, the classic 9th Ward house, was perfect for the climate - cool breezes could circulate from front to back unhindered. With tight budget mandates, as well as must have 6' from the ground, raised construction, and roof hatches, the international teams of architects were told to design new homes, that also had to conform to green building and furnishing precepts.

The architects came back with their designs, which ranged from traditional wooden shotguns to post modern steel and concrete homes, and presented them to members of the 9th Ward community to get their impressions. One of the things most requested was larger, deeper verandas. This is a porch culture, where people socialized and spent a great deal of time on their porches. The committees came back with bigger porches, and other changes, and the building has begun.

Point being, they took the time and effort to see what worked, and to consult with the community about what it needed. These are not the houses of the rich, they are bare bones houses. Anyone building new construction in "fringe communities" who wants to actually sell their houses should take heed. Do some research before putting hand to shovel, or before cranking out these cookie cutter places. Do the houses with large windows sell before those with tiny windows? What works in the community surrounding these houses? What was there before, what will complement the surrounding area, and make these places attractive to potential buyers. If I was building for this market, I can guarantee you, my houses would sell. It doesn't take more money to make a better house, it takes some forethought, some planning, and some consideration for the neighborhood you are creating.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 12:13 PM

Calm...down.... Benson

Montrose....is...actually...tauting Brad....Pitt...as ...a ...serious....builder

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 12:18 PM

benson- before you stick your neck, read up on this first. You might be pleasantly surprised, and Pitt does have a good reputation regarding building homes for the disadvantaged.

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 12:22 PM

Montrose: Spot On!

This monthes issue of Architectural Digest - cover: Brad Pitt Makes it Right in New Orleans.
I haven't read it yet, I can't get past looking at the pictures of him.

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 12:24 PM

oops- stick your neck out. (Go easy on him, MM.)

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 12:25 PM

I'm touting him as someone who has put his money where his mouth is. He is a catylyst for building homes in the 9th Ward. New Orleans isn't doing it, the federal government sure isn't going it, and the insurance industry has prevented many long time homeowners from doing it. So if a big celeb can get some people back into homes, then he's a prince, in my book.

Besides which, Brad Pitt had aspirations of becoming an architect before fame and fortune kissed him. He actually knows what he is talking about. That puts him heads above many people here. I greatly admire what he is doing in New Orleans, and that has nothing to do with his celeb status.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 12:27 PM

Take....more....deep...breaths...Benson
BRG....is ....citing ...cover....of...Architectural...Digest.....to.....show...that...Brad ...is....serious....about....low-income...housing.

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 12:27 PM

aww Montrose, you had to bring up N'Awlins. I was there for the first time a few months ago and absolutely loved the place. The people are so warm and friendly, the music amazing and the Garden District is breath-taking for lovers of older homes.

bxgrl, not only were there tastes in furniture and decorating questionable at best, you should have seen how they dressed me. I don't think there was one name brand piece of clothing in my closet until I was old enough to buy it myself.

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 12:27 PM

"there"

grammatically incorrect!!!

you should have seen how they dressed me - I see their fashion sense hasn't escaped you!

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 12:32 PM

benson, whatever his experience is, why would you criticize someone who's brought so much attention and hope and tangible housing solutions to a city that's so desperately need of these things?

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 12:35 PM

and..er..benson- it's "touting" :-) (Happy to help)

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 12:39 PM

Besides, which, Benson, the point was not that Brad Pitt is doing anything. The point was that builders of this dreck might actually be able to sell them, even in this market, if the houses were designed with a modicum of thought into what constitutes decent design. As long as Brownstoner keeps coming up with these, the fundamental point remains - it IS possible to build decent looking houses for this price point. The builders just don't care enough to do so.

Is this a stoop culture? How about a decent stoop? What is the purpose of those Juliette balconies? If you are hard pressed to fit a potted plant on one, forget about being able to use it, why waste the time and money? If having the meters out front is a NYC code thing, why not come up with a framed box as part of the design to hide the unsightly mess, as they are the only trim on the house, besides the balconies. Do pink bricks complement the rest of the houses on the block? How about different bricks, or how about some paint? Does someone really think those doors are attractive? If you want a door with a window, there are plenty of other alternatives. Oval windows are harder to make, why not square windows on the doors, or no windows?

The list goes on. The argument continues.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 12:41 PM

No, Benson, I cited Arch. Digest to let people know that there is an article about it in a high profile magazine.

I was in the 9th Ward a year after the hurricane. I stood there in disbelief. It was eerily desolate. An entire area wiped out with only a few uninhabitable houses left standing. Nobody was there, Nobody! It was truly heartbreaking. I broke down and cried....cried for this country that shuns the poor, scorns the underprivileged.

I have very close friends in New Orleans who have been displaced by this tragedy (they weren’t in the 9th ward, though). They’ve relocated and haven’t been back to the place they called home all their lives.

I don’t care who steps in and creates cohesive housing…somebody needs to do it.
Brad Pitt has brought positive well deserved attention to the area and I cheer him on.

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 12:52 PM

Well, I guess the Friday Fedder smackdowns do continue!

Biff, I am not criticizing his work as an act of charity. I do admit to rolling my eyes, however, when I see a Hollywood celeb make sure that the cameras are rolling when they are on the scene. Did you see him on Larry King Live recently talking about his work? Sort of reminds me of the admonition in the Bible to go about one's work of charity quietly.

My bigger point, however, is that to take this work as some type of business model for producing low-income housing is just nonsense. If these Fedder homes were being built by just one or two developers, then there might be some merit to the argument that they are the work of people who just don't give a damn about moderate-income housing. The fact is,however,that these homes are built by 100's of small builders,not large developers. It just can't be that all these folks have malice in their heart. I'm sure that some of them want to do some good, as well as make a profit. The fact that they come up with these homes must speak to some kind of reality they face.

If I were one of these builders, I would be pissed off big-time to see a guy like Brad Pitt,who can command cameras and resources that they can't dream of, breeze in and announce "Look, it can be done another way", and then fly off to his next photo shoot for People magazine.

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 1:04 PM

PS;

Thanks for the correction, Bxgrl!!

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 1:05 PM

MM wrote:"What is the purpose of those Juliette balconies? "

Need I point out that these are actually RAPUNZEL balconies. the Hair care Industry has found that citing your fairy tale life is the best way to sell hair extensions- and who had the longest hair around? AHA! Ergo, Hairceleb Hair Supply and Nail Biter Direct has joined with the Construction industry to promote Rapunzel balconies in a major cross-marketing coup.

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 1:16 PM

but benson- Pitt's not the only one coming up with great looking, innovative and affordable housing. did you read the article?

I don't think most developers are malicious at heart either. i think they're mostly small businessmen trying to get the most for their money. I do think a lot of them are too lazy to do a little research- but were I under the gun financially, and I'm pretty sure considering what it takes to build anything in NYC, most of them are, I would want to put up a building as fast as possible, with as little flak as possible.

why should anyone be pissed at Brad Pitt? He actually did spend months in New Orleans working. the premise was to build affordable,great looking housing and they did. He was right- it can be done, and he used his celebrity to get the word out. Truth is, he is right, and that one article got his message out faster and farther than all the other organizations and individuals who believe that same thing could.

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 1:34 PM

benson, whatever it takes to get attention to the situation is New Orleans is the important thing. The end justifies the means. I really don't think Brad Pitt is doing it for a photo op; not that I know the guy (big shock) but if anything he seems to generally try to avoid the spotlight these days, other than to promote the rebuilding of New Orleans. Wow, I feel like I'm posting on tmz.com!

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 1:41 PM

Biff, glad to hear you enjoyed N’awlins. I love it there. I’ve been there so many times, I can’t count. Two of our best friends lived there, and we went often. The Garden district is heavenly. ‘I fantasize about owning one of those houses and standing on my 'veranda' in my hoop skirt ala Scarlett O'hara, calling for Ashley.’
Here’s a teaser: http://z.about.com/d/goneworleans/1/0/9/4/largemansion.jpg

If you haven’t read Rice’s Vampire series, you should. Very descriptive of N’awlins.

I want Bananas Foster, NOW!!!

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 1:52 PM

Pitt is no joke, he apprenticed under Frank Gehry on a designing a hotel in Dubai.

His interest in architecture started well before Katrina hit. He even studied architectural history in college.

In fact for his birthday Angie got him a private tour of Frank Lloyd Wright's house Fallingwater in PA.

Charlie Rose asked him about architecture in the clip below: (it's only about a minute):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLFf11SEctY

and here is the Arch. Digest link:

http://www.architecturaldigest.com/homes/features/2009/01/pitt_article_012009

Posted by: TownhouseLady at January 9, 2009 2:00 PM

I went house shopping in Canarsie with a girlfriend of mine a few years back. She purchased a house not much different from the house on the right in this post. We must have looked at dozens of similar house in Canarsie alone. While I think that her house and the houses in this post are hideous, she and thousands of others love this type of thing. So, builders motivated by what buyers want, keep building them because people buy them.

Posted by: Chaka at January 9, 2009 2:09 PM

Falling Water...worth a trip to see it....Amazing!!

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 2:10 PM

Oh please!!!!!

Hey,I have a graduate degree in mechancial engineering (from one of the top schools in the country), and half my courses were in the field of power generation. I never practiced in this area. You think I have the ability to breeze into Con Ed and "show them how it can be done"?

There are serious entrepeneurs in this country who put their money, their heart and souls into developing new technologies for the benefit of man, whether it's in the field of new, less costly building materials or green energy. It takes these people YEARS to develop these products, and half the time it still doesn't work out.

To think that this pretty-boy celebrity can "jet in" and create a new paradigm in building homes is just ludicrous, and actually an insult to these unsung entrepeneurs. Moreover, to give him credibility because he has a degree in architecture, or interned once under a celebrity architect is also ludicrous. If you believe that, have me come over and I'll design some new heating system for your house. After all, I studied mechancial engineering at a top university.

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 2:11 PM

"Hey,I have a graduate degree in mechancial engineering"

Well, that explains why you are so full of air

Posted by: bayridgegirl at January 9, 2009 2:17 PM

"Somewhere, in the vastness, there is a warehouse stocking these doors, railings, faux bricks, and probably interior everything. They all shop there"

MM,

The same could be said for rowhouses (like mine) that were built on spec at the end of the 19th Century (except for the faux bricks). That's not the problem IMO--it's more that expectations are so much lower now.

Posted by: Bob Marvin at January 9, 2009 2:18 PM

Make that "mechanical"

Have a great day all!!

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 2:19 PM

benson, have a great weekend. If you're bored, you can go see "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" ;-)

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 2:23 PM

I don't think anyone was implying that Benson. I think the point was he's not just an actor who likes houses. He's actually immersing himself in it.

Why exactly do you think that his trying to follow his passion is so repugnant?

Good point Bob. Row houses are the tract homes of yesteryear!

Posted by: TownhouseLady at January 9, 2009 2:24 PM

"Midwood and Albany is hardly the best part of Crown Heights, and may actually be in Flatbush proper. If not, it's certainly on the fringes of CH South/PLG"

It's two blocks east of PLG's eastern (NY Ave.) boundary. I've always thought of the area as East Flatbush (as does my wife, who grew up at Rutland Road & Rockaway Parkway), but FWIW CB-9 refers to it as "Wingate".

Posted by: Bob Marvin at January 9, 2009 2:26 PM

Biff;

I went to see it. My wife loved it. I thought it was boring.

TWL;

I have nothing against Brad. I actually like the guy, and think his intentions are good. I characterized it above as an act of charity (though,once again, I wish these Hollywood types would be more quiet about their acts of charity).

Where I do have an issue is when he can't distinguish between an act of charity in an area of his interest, and trying to show off his moral superiority by announcing to the world that he, pure of intention,has found a new way over those greedy developers.

If you ever listen to Imus, he occassionally gives a behind-the-scenes look at celebrity charity. He talks about one celebrity who demanded a private jet to take her entourage Including hair stylist) along for a commercial shoot for St. Jude's hospital.

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 2:31 PM

I agree with you with regard to celebs doing charity for self promotion. In Brad's case I think he actually shits a sh*t and is stepping up in the hopes others might as well. In the end who knows why but so far as I'm concerned as long as it gets done it's a step in the right direction.

Posted by: TownhouseLady at January 9, 2009 2:38 PM

Not to get off-topic and away from the Horror Show, but benson, you should try to see Slumdog Millionaire. Some of the parts, especially those involving children, are very difficult to watch, but it's an excellent film.

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 2:40 PM

Biff;

Thanks! My wife and I were wondering which movie we should see this week. I was thinking of this film - now it's confirmed.

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 2:44 PM

My college boyfriend moved to New Orleans for his job with an oil company. I loved, loved, loved it. I just can't live down south tho- hate the humidity and heat.

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 2:50 PM

Benson, unfortunately for Brad Pitt, I'm sure he can't take his trash to the curb, if he ever does, without paparazzi surrounding him, and having the photos in next week's National Inquirer: "Angela makes Brad take out trash, will he be the next thing tossed to the curb?" I don't fault him for not being able to keep his charity quiet, if that was his intent.

Besides, as Bxgrl said, what better way to advertise a cause? If his celebrity means that more houses get built, and more attention is paid to rebuilding New Orleans, then great. He is well aware of that, and is using it to the advantage of the project. I don't think he's being morally superior. He, and other celebs, like Bono, who do the same thing with their own causes, is able to do what us mere mortals can't. If that helps others, more power to 'em. They didn't make the system, they are just using it.

I can't imagine the discomfort, invasion of privacy, and pure hell it would be to have photographers, reporters and fans in my face all day, every day, lurking in the bushes, and ambushing me wherever I went. While it's great to be rich and famous, that is a definite downside of celebrity. To be able to turn at least a fraction of that into something that helps those in need must take some of the edge off.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 2:56 PM

Montrose;

Alright, I'll agree with what you just said. Have a great weekend, Montrose!! They're talking about another Brownstoner party - maybe I'll meet you at that one.

Posted by: benson at January 9, 2009 3:09 PM

dunno, benson. Methinks you have issues with brad that go beyond hwat he's trying to do. I know how celebrities can be. Barbra Streisand once sent her publicist and a camerman down to Ground Zero with knot hats for workers with "love,barbra" stamped on them. the publicist wanted to go into the Pit to give them out. Needless to say I scotched that one and made her leave the boxes with us and we gave them out to the guys without publicity. But Alex Baldwin came down and worked like a dog on the food line the entire day and into the night. Never asked for a damn thing in return. He got my full respect for that.

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 3:11 PM

Slumdog and Milk -- both are wonderfully life-affirming films. Slumdog so much better than expected (until you realize that it is a Danny Boyle film).

Posted by: BH76 at January 9, 2009 3:18 PM

benson, I hope you enjoy it. Let me know your thoughts.

Montrose, that faux-headline was hysterical. I think you could write the front page headlines for the Enquirer (or the Post)...not that you would want to.

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 3:31 PM

Continuing off topic, apologies, but "The Times of Harvey Milk" documentary is available FREE to stream off www.hulu.com and it is VERY interesting for those who don't know anything about him (as i didn't before watching..)

Posted by: bowl of dicks at January 9, 2009 3:31 PM

Chaka, great post. Seriously, not making fun, what did she like about it?

Posted by: mopar at January 9, 2009 4:10 PM

These building do look horrible, but unfortunately this is the only investment available for people that can't afford a $1 million brownstone in a decent neighborhood. As horrible as it may look, it's still new construction and produces rental income. Why spend all your money on a new apartment when you can buy an entire building???????

Posted by: jimsullivan30 at January 9, 2009 4:16 PM


What is a "knot hat??"

Posted by: East New York at January 9, 2009 4:36 PM

Benson, I look forward to meeting you, too.

Thanks, Biff, but I don't think they'd hire me. I wrote "Angela" instead of Angelina. What kind of celebrity hound does that?

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 9, 2009 4:48 PM

Montrose, that's even better. You'll sell a million magazines after starting speculation of a Brad Pitt-Angelina Jolie-Angela Landsbury love triangle!

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 4:53 PM

er- that's Lansbury, sweetie.

Posted by: bxgrl at January 9, 2009 5:08 PM

can't we have a developer/builder come on this site, ever? It would be wonderful to be able to engage in a thoughtful discussion with them about things like architectural considerations, FAR calculations, building costs, profitability estimates, community standards, landmarking, dealing with city and state agencies, their personal "vision"... isn't there anybody willing to talk???

Posted by: pfa at January 9, 2009 5:42 PM

pfa, I thought that is what the Inside Third and Bond feature here was for. It's the ongoing saga of a developer's work to bring a project to fruition. Haven't you seen it?

Posted by: Biff Champion at January 9, 2009 5:46 PM

yeah, guess I just blocked third and bond out of my mind 'cause the guy's doing such a great job compared to the schlock/fedders box builders.

Posted by: pfa at January 9, 2009 6:04 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions