« Today on the Forum Closing Bell: Nine Days Left for Shop Brooklyn »
December 16, 2008
Quote of the Day
I pick cereal very quickly thank you very much. Just don't want to pay a crazy price when I am literally seeing price cuts in the hundreds of thousands for some properties we've looked at (but rejected for other criteria). There is basically unanimity that prices will go down in 2009, and possibly through to 2010 and beyond. We only sold a few months ago, and the meltdown happened, so we're just actively looking, but not rushing. We have a list of flexible criteria for the property we're seeking, of which price is just one element - but since price impacts so many other parts of our lives - esp time spent with our kids! (big mortgage = more hours working to pay the bills), price is a major criteria, esp in an environment when prices are headed down.
by Miss Muffett in Last Week's Biggest Sales
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/7657
Comments
"There is basically unanimity that prices will go down in 2009, and possibly through to 2010 and beyond."
It is that basic belief that there's unanimity in a position that usually works against you. It's called a "crowded trade." I don't care in the short run.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at December 16, 2008 3:34 PM
As a previous 'Quote of the Day' honoree and proud to remind everybody of it.
I'm sure Miss Muffett will remind us daily of this quote.
Or did she already :)
Posted by: bayridgegirl at December 16, 2008 3:42 PM
I just want prices to be lower than they are now in 2010 when I begin seriously looking to buy something. My wife and I are hoping to buy a duplex/duplex townhome in North Slope or Carrol Gardens with another couple (friends of ours) who're also getting ready to buy. If we can find one in decent - ie: doesn't need a gut reno - shape in 2010 for like $900k, we'll be all over it. But they're all going for well over a million in those areas right now, so that seems unlikely unless this country really does slide into another great depression.
... at which point, my wife and I might not even have jobs, anyway, so we probably wouldn't be worried about buying a house!
Posted by: cwbuecheler at December 16, 2008 3:45 PM
i'm not sure how much further prices will fall - but i am on the other side and would like to see prices go up. i have a property to sell and this trend is not good for sellers like myself. luckily i'm in a position to hold on but i would much rather sell.
MM - why does bigger mortgage = more work. do you work on commissions or consulting fees? just curious b/c most folks i know have flat salaries and almost all of my friends bonuses - including my own has been cut for Q4 and 2009.
Posted by: bkny at December 16, 2008 3:54 PM
I don't think prices are going to go up for a while. They have been going up up up for over fifteen years now. This is he down cycle. Gotta give it 'til 2011.
Posted by: Inigo at December 16, 2008 4:00 PM
MM you know we support and agree with you but is there any point to making the same exact point daily almost verbatim?
Of course prices are down and are continuing to drop so DIBS for someone looking to buy this short term drop is critical. Buying at this short term bottom may be a " crowded trade" but it is ideal no (with everything else being equal)?
Posted by: pierre de taille at December 16, 2008 4:17 PM
Congrats on making QOTD Miss Muffett!
I stand firm on my belief that house prices will fall 50+% in REAL terms but inflation is going to skew the nominal.
Still not worried about inflation following Uncle Ben's move?
Posted by: the chicken at December 16, 2008 4:36 PM
The Chicken;
During the 90's, the Bank of Japan set interest rates to zero. It did not stop the long deflationary cycle there.
Posted by: benson at December 16, 2008 4:44 PM
The duplex I was looking to buy in a very hot section of Miami 2 years ago for $420K just relisted for $95K in an entire neighborhood of $75-$95 K also on the market now. Everyone is upside down. It can happen here too.
Posted by: williamsburgguy at December 16, 2008 4:46 PM
What happened in Miami Beach can definitely happen here too.
Miami Beach was, and is, hot. But the bubble burst.
Posted by: Inigo at December 16, 2008 4:53 PM
May I say... Good.
I'm mildly happy that this is happening in the real estate market. And I'm glad NYC hasn't been immune to the huge deflation. Of course, the market won't learn any lessons and Bkny, above, will try in a couple years to sell their property for an enormous profit that has no grounding in reality... and someone will pay the money... and we will be back here in another decade or so.
Posted by: tybur6 at December 16, 2008 4:56 PM
I think the future may actually be different from a financing point of view. When banks and appraisers will not appraise houses for these ridiculous prices and buyers will have to come up with the entire difference in cash, sellers will either have to just enjoy living there the rest of their lives or capitulate and sell for what it should be. All the foreclosures that are happening now and will continue to happen into the next several years will set the comps. So ask a million all you want, but if your neighborhood comps are $200K your house will appraise for $200K, and banks will finance for 80% of that. Good luck getting a buyer to cough up an extra $840K in cash for your overpriced house just because you are being greedy. Should have sold it when banks, buyers, and government underwriting and oversight was being stupid. New lending laws and general sanity back in the banks because of the $700B bailout will prevent this from ever occurring again. Bye bye bubble.
Posted by: williamsburgguy at December 16, 2008 5:07 PM
Ahh the Peter Schiff congregation...
He got it right on what went down, but he is losing a lot of money because he was wrong what went up.
Makes a nice Youtube video montage though!
Posted by: crimsonson at December 16, 2008 5:10 PM
But Dave, it's not a trade. ZIRP did nothing to keep the Japan property bubble inflated in the 90s; and now the Fed is totally out of bullets. If this cut doesn't stave off deflation, we all just sit and watch as prices slide, slide, slide. Also, if I buy now with government-mandated low rates, what happens to the price of my house when rates rise? (Hint: ouch.)
Posted by: Whuh at December 16, 2008 5:11 PM
Huh? Schiff was right for three years, and now because stocks have popped back to where they were ten years ago, you think you have the right to cut on Schiff? Some people are headed for the bread line.
Posted by: Whuh at December 16, 2008 5:13 PM
Please change name to Ms. Run-on.
Posted by: FatLenny at December 16, 2008 5:19 PM
Any comparison with Japan is irrelevant for a multitude of reasons. It's not the same. In fact that's all they did from the early 90's until the banks were recapitalised in 2003.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at December 16, 2008 5:22 PM
You can say it; doesn't make it true. Many respected economists are drawing just that parallel. But I've said it before, I'll say it again: since you know "the trade," Dave, go ahead and make it. Just agree to come on here in a year and tell me how it turned out for you.
Posted by: Whuh at December 16, 2008 5:27 PM
So DIBS - what do you think will happen to NY RE market in 2009-2011?
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 5:28 PM
In all seriousness: You understand that the plan now is to "recapitalize" banks by destroying the dollar? And to fight deflation by beggaring savers? You portfolio of investment property may keep the same nominal price. But you get that the actual value will be ravaged?
Posted by: Whuh at December 16, 2008 5:31 PM
If anyone on this blog is Comparing Miami South Beach to NYC you need to see a shrink. You have no clue about real estate do you Inigo .
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 5:33 PM
we're thinking of buying in miami -- we have itty bitty kids and think maybe a condo would be a good idea for a few years for vacations and maybe not a bad investment. I mean, our trips to buenos aires, etc are over, right?
can you really get a decent condo for 95k?
Posted by: Ringo at December 16, 2008 5:43 PM
Sebb you should just buy up all the vacant houses in the entire city since you keep claiming they are all going to be worth 2006 prices again in a few weeks. Guess what, I gave $69K for my 3 story wood frame nothing special Williamsburg house back in 98 when houses all over the country of similar size were selling for..........$69K (and houses in Miami were selling for MORE - I know because I was looking there then too). These same nothing special houses on my block in 2006 were selling for 1.5M as were nothing special houses in Miami and other hot spots. Guess what, NYC is just about the ONLY "hot" spot left and it's cooling fast. My neighbor just dropped his price from 1.3M to 1.1M. You better come get it now while its cheap so you can cash out next year and double your money. But I figure you better bring cash since I doubt it will appraise.
Posted by: williamsburgguy at December 16, 2008 5:57 PM
williamsburgguy listen to me clearly you know nothing about Real Estate nothing. Now let's listen to what cramer just said Housing is a Buy Buy Buy right now. It does not take a Education to figure out the Fed will not let the Economy fail. Housing will be back in 2009. This will be a once in a lifetime chance to buy a home with mortgage rates so low.
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 6:11 PM
Really. I suppose my brokers license and several years of RE practice are no match for your years of expertise and watching infomercials. LOL LIke I said, I can hook you up with my neighbor. Deal of a lifetime in your world.
Posted by: williamsburgguy at December 16, 2008 6:19 PM
$69,000 for a house in Williamsburg in '98? Really? You would have paid twice as much for a 2BR pre-war coop in Jackson Heights.
Posted by: mopar at December 16, 2008 6:21 PM
"It does not take a Education to figure out the Fed will not let the Economy fail."
From the grammar and capitalization of sebb's comment, he doesn't have much of "a Education" himself.
Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at December 16, 2008 6:46 PM
"The Fed will not let the economy fail." Where was the Fed in '06, in '07, in '08? The Federal reserve has shown no foresight whatsoever in this crisis. Can anyone tell me what arrow the Fed has left in its quiver? Seriously --you have interest rates effectively at zero; an unlimited borrowing window for the major banks; the fed has even suggested it will print its own bonds. What is left? If this latest set of moves doesn't work, we are in for a long, hard landing.
Posted by: Whuh at December 16, 2008 6:49 PM
damn, crisis? What crisis? Sebb just provided the solution to all our woes - Cramer! LOL hahahaha @ Sebb
Posted by: cornerbodega at December 16, 2008 7:06 PM
LOL if you will but the truth is the Govt will bail out whatever it needs to. Let the Bulls run.
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 7:12 PM
Sebb why are you so sure housing will be back in less that a year? Really 2009? Do you have any objective data to that effect? Or are you simply hoping the FED will rescue us...they are certainly trying but it hasn't worked one iota. The indicators all point to housing being down for a few years but maybe you have other data.
Posted by: pierre de taille at December 16, 2008 7:19 PM
In 98 Williamsburg, that was a normal price for these old aluminum sided woodies, and out all over Queens at that time were many many similar prices. Actually in some places in Queens prices are falling back to almost this level now due to foreclosure comps - you can look at the recent foreclosure sales in MLS for proof. I think all the people on here who think it could never happen here are just too young to know anything different. The last 10 years are not typical of any real estate inflation at any time on history, and prices in the hundreds of thousands or millions for anything short of a 60 acre estate with mansion and moat are just not typical. It just doesn't happen this way unless something crooked is going on - and we know now exactly what and to what extent that was. Million dollar houses used to only be found in Beverly Hills, UES, or out in the Hamptons and were really something special - not a fixer upper in the Burg or BS. And, considering wages and debt to income ratios, they should still only be found in those markets. If you have to live 10 people to your house just to make the payments, you are living beyond your means. And the Fed? Geez. Give me a break. The Fed is worried about how we stand with other countries, not whether your overpriced house that you cannot afford but bought anyway will be foreclosed on. There will be several rude awakenings over the next months and lots of suckers will be revealed.
Posted by: williamsburgguy at December 16, 2008 7:20 PM
I agree that Miami Beach is not exactly comparable to Brooklyn, in many ways MB has a lot more going for it than Brooklyn. First of all, most of the product there is A-grade, no tacky flammable walkups, secondly, many people from all over the country were interested in buying a vacation property there, thirdly there was also a strong demand from European and Latin American buyers. Face it MB was OZ, Brooklyn is Kansas. If the RE market tanked there, what hope do we have in our homely little traffic-choked "outer Boro"? Real Estate is about dreams and aspirations, maybe SEBB is a little weak on the subject.
Posted by: Inigo at December 16, 2008 7:26 PM
Inigo : so you are telling me that some little 3rd world area called Miami Beach is oz? The same place that is 15 blocks long? The same place that employers pay $9 an hour ? The same place that has zero jobs? The same place that South Americans who don't have a dime in their pockets bought tons of real estate? The same place that was just listed by the FBI as one of the most dangerous places to live in the United States? Is that the same Miami Beach?
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 7:48 PM
by: williamsburgguy: Townhomes in Cobble hill were going for over a million in 1997. Your information is wrong.
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 7:50 PM
sebb, i think you are humorous, and I think you have not been out of brooklyn much. Miami beach is fabulous, if you haven't been you should go. In your first posting you called it South Beach, but you know South Beach is just the relatively small historic district there. It has all those incredible Art Deco buildings as well as the mediterreanean style villas like the one Versace owned. Maybe you are confusing that with the greater city of Miami beach, not to mention the enormous Metropolis of Miami. Anyway, north of the two-mile strip that is the "Art Deco District" is the modern city with highrises along the beachfront and beautiful homes facing the bay. Compared to Brooklyn, which I love, but you know, is Brooklyn, MB is OZ. really it is just beautiful and the beach is beautiful and the folks on the bay have their yachts parked in their back yards, it really isn't poor and squalid if that is what you mean by Third World (there are loads of very wealthy people and exquisite communities in the Third World but that is another lesson).
Posted by: Inigo at December 16, 2008 8:22 PM
Yes, there were some pristine townhomes in Cobble Hill and Brooklyn Heights (and even sparsely scattered throughout other areas) for those prices in 1997 Sebb - but not common 4 story fixer-upper crap or 5 family conversions like they are asking those prices for today and for the past few years. I'm not saying there weren't million dollar homes here in 1997, but those were by far the exception and were very grand in size and finishes on the best blocks. I can tell you in most areas of Brooklyn and Queens in 1997 you were looking in the 70-250 range at most for your typical 3-4 story 2 family townhouse. I sold a many of them for those prices. Of course I don't know why I'm bothering to feed a troll. Put your money where your mouth is Sebb. Come on over to Ainslie street. I'm sure my neighbor would love to talk to you and you can make a million in a year on his old wooden framed house just like you say.
Posted by: williamsburgguy at December 16, 2008 9:06 PM
The million dollar homes in Cobble Hill in 1997 were $335,000 in 1992.
Posted by: Inigo at December 16, 2008 9:13 PM
"The million dollar homes in Cobble Hill in 1997 were $335,000 in 1992."
And 125K in 1982
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at December 16, 2008 9:40 PM
sebb is obviously about thirteen years old, let him be.
The important news today is that Gov. Paterson (recently impersonated so brilliantly on SNL) has just raised taxes and fees on about eighty common consumer items from soda to ipods to cable and cabs.
This will sink NY faster than an iceberg.
People with know-how will leave.
That will leave the old, the young, the poor, and the over-taxed who are a step away from being poor.
Good night New York, it was swell while it lasted.
Posted by: Inigo at December 16, 2008 9:40 PM
Inigo : my friend i am very familiar with Miami Beach South beach and Miami. As a matter of Fact Miami beach just ranked #50 on the FBI most dangerous list, Miami ranked even worse and Miami Gardens ranked #13. BTW the people you say have all that money and Yachts and stuff are all fake who live off of credit . But guess what they are cooked now.
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 9:49 PM
"has just raised taxes and fees on about eighty common consumer items from soda to ipods to cable and cabs.
This will sink NY faster than an iceberg."
Yeah, spending $1.38 on a $1.25 Mountain Dew will turn NYC into a ghost town in days flat. Or that $99 iPod nano going up to $106. THAT will just bury the city. What WILL WE DO?
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at December 16, 2008 10:00 PM
First japan's bubble was much bigger than ours. Prices at the height of their real estate bubble were in some areas 150 grand a square ft. Yes that is correct and not a typO. Second they have a totally different culture than ours. Third, they didn't have the rest of the country easing at the same time as them. Fourth nobody besides the japanese want to live in japan. With all this easing its hard to not see inflationary pressures in the future. Sure it will take a while becuase the consumer is tapped out. This will help but it will take time. House prices will keep coming down especially where rents don't justify the asking price. My home is only worth 500k yet I receive 3500 a month from my rents. Easily enought to pay my mortgage and taxes and have some money as profit,thats if i had a mortgage. I see homes that would not rent for 3500 selling for 1 million plus in some areas of Brooklyn. Those will at one point sell alot lower than they are now. Keep in mind that if the USA government does get inflation back into the scene than holding your house will protect you from the dollars fall. Though that may be years away.
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at December 16, 2008 10:33 PM
Rent is another thing in for a correction. Take for example your rent Hobokenrocks, 3500/month is $42K a year. Using the currently valid 36% of income to be sustainable one would need to make $116K to be able to afford that rent long-term. That is certainly more than most renters make per year. So long term, rents will have to fall in order to actually have a sustainable market of long-term renters. Sure you will get short timers who rnt until they run out of money, but short-term renters are not what landlords need to stay in business. Its ALL due a severe and painful correction
Posted by: williamsburgguy at December 16, 2008 11:09 PM
Actually I have a two family each apt is paying 1750 a month. My first floor apt is underpriced by at least 250 dollars since they get the deck and backyard access. These rents are actually low compared to what others get in the area for similar apts. I am happy to have good tenants and won't be raising their rents any time soon.. So I think I am fine. This is jersey city though. In Hoboken my home would be over 1 million and my rents would be at least 2500 each floor, most likely more since they are true 3 bedroom apts..
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at December 16, 2008 11:37 PM
"Huh? Schiff was right for three years, and now because stocks have popped back to where they were ten years ago, you think you have the right to cut on Schiff? Some people are headed for the bread line."
Uhm Schiff predicted the fall but he also tried to predict what was going to go up. He is wrong on that. He predicted that gold would be 1200 by now and 2000 by early next year.
He also predicted the dollar would collapse this year. He is also wrong on that.
Many of his predictions about what was going to go up along with the market crash is wrong.
But as I said, his 'edited' predictions makes a nice YouTube video.
Posted by: crimsonson at December 17, 2008 12:22 AM
NYC rents are already dropping like rocks in an avalanche.
Brooklyn rents have already dropped 25% in the last two months alone. The days of $2000/mo rent for a small one bedroom apartment in Park Slope are over, folks. Think $1200 to $1500/mo max next time you have a vacancy, unless you're willing to hold out for a naive over-payer, in which case your total rent collected for the year will decline nonetheless since you'll sit for months with a vacant apartment while you wait.
Rents are more like stock prices than housing prices because they change nearly immediately when demand declines -- which makes perfect sense since a one year rental lease can be increased just a year later, and collecting a significantly lower rent is still far better than collecting no rent at all.
When folks sell their house, it's usually the biggest financial deal of their lives, and there's no going back if they sell too low, so obviously sellers are much more reluctant to lower prices than are rental landlords. But little by little, as sellers are forced to drop their asking prices in line with their competition, a big time NYC price correction will occur which may take years to bottom out.
Posted by: IronBalls at December 17, 2008 12:27 AM
HOBOKENROCKS:
Those high rents you're talking about are for apartments that were leased months ago, long before the stock market and housing market's imploded.
Our economy is a shell of what it was a year ago and current market rents reflect it.
Posted by: IronBalls at December 17, 2008 12:34 AM
"The Chicken;
During the 90's, the Bank of Japan set interest rates to zero. It did not stop the long deflationary cycle there."
Posted by: benson at December 16, 2008 4:44 PM
"But Dave, it's not a trade. ZIRP did nothing to keep the Japan property bubble inflated in the 90s; and now the Fed is totally out of bullets. If this cut doesn't stave off deflation, we all just sit and watch as prices slide, slide, slide. Also, if I buy now with government-mandated low rates, what happens to the price of my house when rates rise? (Hint: ouch.)"
Posted by: Whuh at December 16, 2008 5:11 PM
Whuh, the Fed is not out of bullets yet. It has exactly one left - buying back long-dated government paper. ie turning on the printing presses (and you can bet Helicopter Ben has been waiting for this day).
and Benson, this is why today is not like 90's Japan....
And that is why responsible savers like myself are f@#ked.
Posted by: the chicken at December 17, 2008 4:44 AM
Exactly --the prudent are now getting screwed. Setting aside how much mindless housing speculation contributed to this fiasco, the next wave of "bitterness" won't be limited to renters. First it will be everyone who stayed out of debt and lived within their means; then it will be everyone --i.e., every American who, after celebrating the return of their house price to par, realizes their dollars buy a third of what they used to. Dollar is right now cratering, thanks to Helicopter Ben. But some people still think they'll emerged unscathed, because their investment properties in urban fringe areas are still "worth" x number of dollars. Incredible.
Posted by: Whuh at December 17, 2008 8:05 AM
Whuh, what are you talking about. My dollar buys way more now than it has for the last 5 years in my home country (UK). And in the US we're on the verge of deflation, at least disinflation, that is what we are trying to avoid. Please explain what you mean...
My gas tank now costs half what it did to fill in the summer.
Posted by: dittoburg at December 17, 2008 8:12 AM
dittoburg, just because the UK is screwed does not mean that the US is not - it's all relative.
The dollar's strength since the middle of the year to the end of November caught a lot of people offside and it's mainly down to the underestimation of the dollar being the global currency of choice. But that game is over now.
Posted by: the chicken at December 17, 2008 8:30 AM
There was a speculative bubble in oil that spiked gas prices over the summer; that's not a reasonable basis for comparison going forward. Deflation in the near term means your purchasing power increases; but Bernanke is fighting deflation by debasing the currency, which means, in the long run, the dollar will collapse, and possibly lose reserve currency status; with the possible nightmare scenario of a US default. (These are not chicken little scenarios; markets price the probability of a US default, and lately the price indicates that risk is increasing.) The UK is a bigger basket case than the US, so of course the dollar has rallied against the pound, but from a secular position of weakness. (There still is no purchasing power parity between the US and the UK.) The RMB is the currency to look at, but if you're arguing that we will be rescued by a round of competitive devaluation, then I am very amused at your idea of "rescue."
Posted by: Whuh at December 17, 2008 9:06 AM
Whuh stated "the dollar is cratering", thats simply not true. A dollar buying a "third of what is used to" is not the case. So, again, explain please.
Posted by: dittoburg at December 17, 2008 9:07 AM
actually the dollar getting weaker will help a bit. It will bring the euro dollars back into manhattan and other areas. I see alot of europeans at my son's school in Hoboken. If the EURO keeps strong than that may help a bit but I see them getting with the program and start easing again. If not they will be the last to get out of this recession and probably risk hurting the euro alot more than if they just eased. As for my rents they are low in comparison to my next door neighbors. He gets more money for his two apts and I also give my renters storage space in the basement he does not. Even if my rents went down I would still be fine since I purchased this property years ago thru a estate sale.. I only buy things on sale.... That is the way to do things ..
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at December 17, 2008 9:13 AM
I didn't argue anything about a rescue - you appear to be having an argument with someone inside your head. I was not understanding your factually incorrect statements about the current state of the dollar. Now I see that you are predicting that the dollar will crater, and massive inflation will occur. fair enough.
Posted by: dittoburg at December 17, 2008 9:14 AM
Ditto, note my post above. If it still doesn't make sense: The Fed is fighting deflation --so of course your dollar purchases more now than it did before. This is the only real definition of the phenomenon, as I understand it. Are you now arguing for deflation? If so, please explain how housing prices in Brooklyn will be affected by a massive deflation? It is possible that Bernanke will lose the battle against deflation (I think it is likely) in which case your dollars will be worth more, but only because they are, as they were in the GD, incredibly scarce --i.e, you will have so few it will still feel like poverty. It's possible Bernanke will win the fight against deflation, but at the cost of the dollar's authority against other currencies. In which case, you will feel poor because, though you have more dollars, their purchasing power is vastly reduced --especially against Toyotas and oil and Miele appliances and exotic alpine cheeses. If you think Bernanke will re-boot the system at no loss to you, then I'm wondering why, given his superpowers, he failed to avert the current cataclysm. Please explain.
Posted by: Whuh at December 17, 2008 9:16 AM
I'm arguing with DIBS, who thinks everything is going to be fine. Far worse than arguing with someone in my head.
Posted by: Whuh at December 17, 2008 9:17 AM
Well I've never seen DIBS in person, so I'm not sure if he's a figment of my imagination. Or you all are in fact.
Posted by: dittoburg at December 17, 2008 9:23 AM
We all are.
Posted by: Whuh at December 17, 2008 9:43 AM
When my friend was looking in 98, Williamsburg houses were going for more like $350K, for the 2 and 3-families. The smaller shacks were about 150K, but they were actual shacks. This was a huge uptick from a few years previous, granted. I remember at the time thinking those had to be the ceiling... because unlike most of the rest of Brooklyn, the architecture just wasn't that great.
Okay, so I was wrong.
Anyways, my friend bought a shack in Park Slope instead. Because it was cheaper.
So I guess what I am saying, Williamsburgguy, is I wish we had known you then! I would have happily bought one of your properties for $68K.
To go back to the broader issue at hand, I guess we need inflation. Maybe the traders will artificially boost commodities prices again and make that happen.
Posted by: Heather at December 17, 2008 9:51 AM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.