« Open House Picks: Six Months Later Streetlevel: Marlow & Daughters Now Open »

December 19, 2008

Open House Picks

housePark Slope
6 3rd Street
Corcoran
Sunday 2:30-4
$1,895,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseCrown Heights
1094 Park Place
Douglas Elliman
Saturday 12-3
$1,345,000 (was $1,395,000 then $1,200,000)
GMAP P*Shark

houseBay Ridge
445 100th Street
Re/Max
Sunday 12-3
$679,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseFlatbush
244 Martense Street
Fillmore
Sunday 2-4
$499,000
GMAP P*Shark




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/7698

Comments

1094 Park Place seller is head strong.

***Bid half off peak comps***

Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at December 19, 2008 1:11 PM

Not sure what's going on with the price of the CH place but, to me, that looks like real value for the money. Absolutely gorgeous.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at December 19, 2008 1:14 PM

I love the Crown Heights house, and it is move in ready, with all systems redone. I know the owners put a boatload of time, money and new bathrooms and kitchen in here, as well as new fencing, a gorgeous back yard deck and garden, and all kinds of goodies. But the previous 1.2 million price was much more sane than going up again. It's a gorgeous home, but it just ain't going to happen, especially now. Too bad, it's probably the best house in the bunch, best house in a whole bunch of weeks, but......

Posted by: Montrose Morris at December 19, 2008 1:19 PM

that 3rd street house is clearly not in park slope.is it a mistake,or r they delibratly doing that?

Posted by: buckfast at December 19, 2008 1:24 PM

First listing is Carroll Gardens, not Park Slope. Also, two doors down from that odd place with the bedbug sign in the window. Anyone know what's up with that?

Posted by: feral at December 19, 2008 1:25 PM

Wow, Bay Ridge actually makes an open house pick. Needs a lot of cosmetic work, but it has potential.

Posted by: italiana71 at December 19, 2008 1:27 PM

Wasn't that Crown Heights place featured here a while back already? I remember those odd shaped radiators (I think that's what we decided they were) in the living room.

Posted by: Biff Champion at December 19, 2008 1:28 PM

If you're a Corcoran RE agent, Park slope extends all the way to Smith Street. There's North Slope, South Slope, Gowanus Slope...

Posted by: theandrewlee at December 19, 2008 1:34 PM

yep:

http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2008/08/house_of_the_da_553.php

So it's been on the market for well over a year now. A real shame as some realistic pricing earlier on could have moved it back then for more than it will get now (plus not paying the taxes and getting the interest).

Shame - it's a very nice house....

Posted by: the chicken at December 19, 2008 1:39 PM

Must be me but that 1094 CH house reminds me of a funeral home. Not my cup of tea at all. And that sink - wow. Like gag wow.

Posted by: crimsonson at December 19, 2008 1:40 PM

1094 Park Place seller is head soft.

Posted by: SnarkSlope at December 19, 2008 1:42 PM

the chicken, thanks. I think it's a gorgeous home (even if not to crimsonson's taste).

Posted by: Biff Champion at December 19, 2008 1:43 PM

yes, crimsonson, but it's just a sink. This house seems really beautiful and special to me too. Don't know a thing about the street or the neighborhood, but the house is lovely.

Posted by: Nokilissa at December 19, 2008 1:46 PM

1094 pp will sell for best offer at the end of the year that can close by Feb 28.

I offered 715k just in case no one had.

Posted by: slick at December 19, 2008 1:58 PM

What is next to 1094? Looks like big concrete walls on both sides...

Posted by: BH76 at December 19, 2008 2:06 PM

Did anyone notice the last photo of the Crown Heights place? It seems to be between two long cinderblock buildings on either side. One seems like it might be a church or synagogue, but it was a real turn off for me. Maybe it looks better in real life.

But, I can't understand what people are thinking. If I had 1.4 million to spend, why in the world would I want to spend it to live in this place? Sure, it seems like a lovely house, but I'd rather buy a house in the suburbs for way less than half this price. The run up in prices is based on this ridiculous notion than anywhere in Brooklyn, as long as it's Brooklyn, is somehow worth 3x as much as anywhere else despite a neighborhood's lack of amenities, good schools, or anything else.

Brooklyn neighborhoods used to be the best bargain around. Middle class people bought brownstones and could live with rental income and raise a family. But all perspective was lost -- now a house in a middling location in Crown Heights can ask 1.4 million and people think it's a bargain if you get it for only 1.1 million. NOT. Until these homes become affordable for middle class families again, these prices are ridiculous, and it astounds me that there are still buyers silly enough to pay these kinds of inflated prices.


Posted by: CGfan at December 19, 2008 2:14 PM

1094 is on a nice block. It's between a beautiful old Synagogue (now housing a Baptist congregation) and brownstones. And it's kitty-corner from Brower Park which is next to the Children's Museum.

Still if you had $1.3 M to spend nowadays on single family residence, I don't think you would be living this deep in CH.

Posted by: theandrewlee at December 19, 2008 2:15 PM

Er... In defense of 1094 Park Place, this is a unique historical property.

Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the Brower family lived in the home. And the building has a covered driveway, and is enormous in size. It has one of those massive curved stairways in the atrium.

This was never a "middle class" home. It was the home of the most prominent family in that area.

Posted by: theandrewlee at December 19, 2008 2:26 PM

Slick,

What is the significance of a pre-feb. 28th close?
Am I missing something?

Posted by: manofelt at December 19, 2008 2:30 PM

"Until these homes become affordable for middle class families again, these prices are ridiculous, and it astounds me that there are still buyers silly enough to pay these kinds of inflated prices."

There are still plenty of Asshats running around.

Do you know that most Real Estate Brokers and Agents go home for the holidays? From Thanksgiving to New Years Real Estate is DEAD! You know something? I would not even think about "Buying Something" until;l they get this mess cleaned up. The Madoff thing has punched o hole in the Mutant Asset Bubble and the Asshats see the writing in the wall.

Hey DIBS How is the Hedge Fund redemption thang going?? Yep you and your Homeboys are being taken to the Woodshed. I some happy that we wont have to hear your imitation of Larry Kudrow!

RIP Mutant Asset Bubble....

The What

Someday this war is gonna end..

Posted by: Return of The What at December 19, 2008 2:31 PM

Having seen the crown heights house, it is stunningly gorgeous. I don’t personally love the kitchen or bathes, but the house is amazing. The garden is very zen.

Now, while I’m glad that Bay Ridge is getting some love here in the open house picks (for the first time, I think). And granted there isn’t lot of open houses in Bay Ridge this weekend (psst, Christmas is next week). Mr. B, next time please feature a better house. I wouldn’t mind seeing some of the multi-million dollar homes on here. While I know you wanted to feature a lower priced home; and this is probably the least expensive two-family in Bay Ridge. This one makes the nabe look very schlocky.
This is in the very southern tip of Bay Ridge. There’s a lot more to love in the nabe than this.

Not an open house, but the nabe is full of these types of homes,
http://brownharrisstevens.com/detail.aspx?id=940746

Along with townhouses.....here’s a very nice one family limestone
http://realestate.nytimes.com/sales/detail/2431-45874/BAY-RIDGE-NY-11209

And a cute brick:
http://realestate.nytimes.com/sales/detail/2431-45874/BAY-RIDGE-NY-11209

Posted by: bayridgegirl at December 19, 2008 2:33 PM

Kinda digging that flatbush house ... don't know the surrounding area tho.

Posted by: cwbuecheler at December 19, 2008 2:35 PM

i'll agree with you BRG, that this isn't one of the nicer townhomes but the price is very good. Someone with an eye for decorating could really make the place into a charmer.

Posted by: italiana71 at December 19, 2008 2:42 PM

WOW...BRG...that Brown harris listing is incredible...and, they did a great job on both the bathroom and the kitchen...a magnificent house

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at December 19, 2008 2:42 PM

I need to get into a different line of work. That $2.5mm house that BRG linked is gorgeous.

Posted by: cwbuecheler at December 19, 2008 2:46 PM

BRG...how long would it take to get to 42nd street on that R train from that beautiful house????

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at December 19, 2008 2:54 PM

"BRG...how long would it take to get to 42nd street on that R train from that beautiful house????"

DIBS, let's put it this way: you better leave now if you want to get there by Monday.

Posted by: Biff Champion at December 19, 2008 2:57 PM

I agree 100% with CGFan. I like Brooklyn, and really like the architecture, but it seems assinine to spend $1.4 million on a house in a less desirable area with few amenities and where safety may be an issue. I also don't fully comprehend spending $2 million on a house in a more desireable area (such as Brooklyn Heights, Park Slope, Fort Green, etc) that needs another $500K in renovations. You can buy beautiful turn of the century houses in the suburbs within a 30 minute train ride, for much cheaper. Granted Brooklyn has more to offer in some regards (culture, restaurants, etc), but there is a lot to be said for purchasing a home within your budget and not stretching yourself to the max (or beyond)....

Posted by: Splenda at December 19, 2008 2:57 PM

Jeez that BHS house that BRG posted is so Scarsdale! But the townhouse is quite lovely and not too absurdly priced.

So, when people say that a place is a "good value" or "well priced" what are they comparing the price to? How does anyone know what a good value is at the moment. Things that closed last week are now overpriced, so what do you use as a comp?

Posted by: shillstoner at December 19, 2008 2:59 PM

We're in Bay Ridge and it takes my hubby 45min to an hour to get to 50th and Lex. But he averages about 50 minutes.

Posted by: italiana71 at December 19, 2008 2:59 PM

that's door to door, by the way.

Posted by: italiana71 at December 19, 2008 3:05 PM

shillstoner - my rationale is as follows: if it's $600k or under and I actually want to live in it, it's well-priced. Because that's as much as my wife and I can plausibly afford without reaching a point where we can't actually go anywhere, do anything, or furnish the house. :)

Posted by: cwbuecheler at December 19, 2008 3:06 PM

"BRG...how long would it take to get to 42nd street on that R train from that beautiful house????"

Why 42nd street ????
Gas is so cheap, I drive everywhere. Plus, I need my car (back seat) to ply my trade!!

Seriously, about 45 minutes. But one can use those time to read and learn to spell and create grammitically correct sentances.

Posted by: bayridgegirl at December 19, 2008 3:08 PM

cw, that is a good way of determining if a property is a good value for you--and it is of course how we all do it (get the place we most like that we can possibly afford). But it doesn't mean the property is a "good value" in the broader sense.

Posted by: shillstoner at December 19, 2008 3:11 PM

shillstoner - I know. I was just kidding around. I try not to make statements about what's a good value or not because honestly a) I don't know enough about RE comps to be sure, especially in the current economy and b) I think pretty much everything in Brooklyn is overvalued by a ridiculous amount, so nothing here is really a good value. Housing here is basically a sacrifice one makes in order to live in the city. But you could have 85% of the lifestyle for 50% (or less) of the cost in several major US cities.

Posted by: cwbuecheler at December 19, 2008 3:15 PM

wasn't there another house house of the day close to the 3rd st house. like on the same block. did anyone know how much that one went for?

Posted by: armchairwarrior at December 19, 2008 3:17 PM

armchairwarrior, I think it is the same house on 3rd street that was HOTD a while back:

- http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2008/08/house_of_the_da_551.php

Posted by: SnarkSlope at December 19, 2008 3:36 PM

Haha, 6 3rd street sold for $975k a few months ago!

Posted by: stuntmanmike at December 19, 2008 3:47 PM

Am I wrong but does the wall paper in the 100th St. house have pool tables on it? Can anyone see it better than me?

Posted by: TownhouseLady at December 19, 2008 3:51 PM

Yes, what's up with 6 3rd street?

November 13, 2007
House of the Day: $975,000

- http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2007/11/house_of_the_da_407.php

August 25, 2008
House of the Day: $1,395,00

- http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2008/08/house_of_the_da_551.php

December 19, 2008
Open House Picks: $1,895,000

Posted by: SnarkSlope at December 19, 2008 4:13 PM

Here’s some history on the Crown Heights house:

George W. Brower, for whom the adjacent park and school is named, built this house for his daughter. His own house was right next door on the corner. As theandrewlee states, this was never a middle class house. The park, at the time called Bedford Park, and surrounding area was part of the St. Mark’s District, a wealthy enclave of successful merchants and businessmen, of which Brower was one. Brower lived in his own home until his death in 1921, at which time the lot was sold. In 1923, the Shaare Zedek Synagogue was built on the site of Brower’s home. The congregation eventually sold the building, and it is now the home of the First Historic Church of God in Christ. That is the building to the right of the house. It is sheathed in limestone and marble, so that is not cinderblock in the photo. On the left is the first in a grouping of 5 English basemented, Neo-Classical brick and limestone houses, all in great condition. Beause the house is situated back into the lot, and because the temple/church is so prominent, this house is nestled into the lot, and seems to be protected from the street. It always is an unexpected treat to see it, and you have to be right on the corner, in order to do so.

I’m not going to go into the whole Crown Heights/safety/fringe thing, it’s been done to death. I will say that this house has been renovated to the expectations of your way pricier Park Slope home. It is on two lots, at least, and is totally freestanding. There is a very large, well done garden and huge deck in the back. It has had an extensive, and expensive roof to cellar renovation, and is truly move in ready. I personally am not too fond of the kitchen or the bathrooms, but will concede that they are all well done, with the best materials and appliances. I also would not have painted the woodwork on the parlor floor, but that could be changed if desired. Those are radiators in the parlor, very unique pieces, for sure. I hope someone who truly appreciates the house and the neighborhood buys this in the near future. It’s a beautiful house, with an impressive past.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at December 19, 2008 4:14 PM

the commuting times you people are stating is a little strange... i take the R from 4th avenue and union to the Prince street stop in soho and it is EXACTLY 24-25 minutes. 45 from bay ridge to time square on the local R? nah. that would definitely be a good 60. you might want to try hopstop.com or something like that, tht gives you the exact minutes from each train stop to another train stop.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at December 19, 2008 4:16 PM

Rob, it's with an express hook-up...at 36th street, you have a choice of taking the 'N' or the 'D (both express)...45 minutes door to door.

Can't make out the wallcovering in the 100st house, but those stools are great. Clean those up and put zebra hair on the seat...oh la la!!

Posted by: bayridgegirl at December 19, 2008 4:19 PM

We used to give ourselves at least 30-45 minutes to get anywhere in Manhattan from Park Slope on the R/N. I'm a fan of Bay Ridge, used to rent there, and think it's a great option for those spending less than a million. But it is what it is, a far location, and people need to be more honest about the commute time. Starting with not only counting the time on the train but walking to the stops and waiting on platforms. The R and the N are often long waits. Also people's testimonies can be deceiving and not apply to the house you're considering. Bay Ridge stretches out from the 60's to the 90's and includes 4 stops that are a full 10 blocks apart on the R. So when somebody says their husband takes 45 minutes to get to Midtown, that person could be living in the 60's or 70's right by the subway stop but not telling you that. Or they could live walking distance to the N at 56th and not have to bother with that pokey old R train at all. Which is a very different commute from that of the person living at 100th Street. And what about people who work in say, Soho and wouldn't change to the N, but rather ride the R the whole way? Yikes. In the end you have to test the commute yourself to see if it works for you.

Posted by: traditionalmod at December 19, 2008 4:25 PM

that's what i do. i dont bother getting on the N express just take the local R all the way into soho. besides there is always a seat even during rush hour in the morning and the evening on the R but then you look across at the N and it's a bunch of sardines. i'd much rather have a seat, read, drink a lil somethin' somethin' from my thermos, and enjoy a relaxing commute. plus it's a vintage orange train with flattering light for most complexions. the glaring fluorescence of the newer trains, you can see everyones facial imperfections, and id imagine if you are nose to nose with someone on a squished packed train, that's just gotta be grody.

*rob*

Posted by: PitbullNYC at December 19, 2008 4:33 PM

"for those spending less than a million"
--Sounds like a horrible disease.

MM, yes the CH house looks lovely. Very special. But I think that most people--not on this blog, but in the real world--have already gotten past the silly idea that "special" automatically means something is worth over a million. In the current state of the world and market I have trouble seeing anyone spending over a million for it. But I could be totally off. We'll see.

Posted by: shillstoner at December 19, 2008 4:36 PM

re 3 3rd St in CARROLL GARDENS

According to ACRIS it went into contract 1/20/08 and closed on 8/20/08 $975,000. Obviously as soon as the new owner bought it (holding mortgages of $1,130,000 he tried to flip it for $1,395,000 on 8/25/08. When that didn't happen he did the conversion from a double duplex to a triplex w/garden rental and is now trying to get $1,895,000 for it.

Too bad that they couldn't be bothered to take into interior pictures when re-listing it.

Posted by: 99luftballons at December 19, 2008 4:43 PM

i thought it might be the same house but i was like can't be LOL.

wow thats a huge flip. are they nuts!!! and have they done anything new to the place?

Posted by: armchairwarrior at December 19, 2008 4:50 PM

The 3rd st house was a total gut job. Looks like they did a nice job from the outside. Not sure about interior.

Posted by: sebb at December 19, 2008 5:17 PM

Sebb,
I saw them unloading Wolf and Subzero appliances for the 3rd street property. I would assume that they did a decent job.
However, regardless of the quality of the reno, this property is going to sit at this price. The building isn't over 40 feet long and its location by the corner of Smith and 3rd Street is noisy. It would be better to buy a 3 story property on a place block and not deal with the rental.
Vinnie

Posted by: vinnie_barbarino at December 19, 2008 5:54 PM

Here's the broker's pitch for the Park Place house:

"...a fabulous investment. Come discover the next "IT" neighborhood, now what everyone will be flocking to in the next couple of years."

I actually don't disagree with that -- I could definitely imagine Crown Heights becoming a neighborhood people flock to in the next few years.

But, in the real world, the reason to look in a neighborhood that has yet to be "discovered" is to purchase a bargain. It's completely irrelevant that this was once a mansion for rich people -- there are plenty of former mansions all over the country in so-so neighborhoods that no one wants to live in. In fact, there were plenty of former mansions in Park Slope and Fort Green that middle class buyers willing to buy in an "undiscovered" neighborhood bought for a song many years ago.

Park Slope, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens, Fort Green all became neighborhoods with homes only rich people could afford only after lots and lots of middle income people bought houses there. But now fringe neighborhoods, propped up by the bubble, expect these kinds of prices. The only house here most people I know could afford is the $499,000 one. Believe it or not, half a million dollars is alot of money to spend on housing if you aren't rich and for most people, even professional working ones, even that is a stretch.

If the housing market does crash, communities like Crown Heights will greatly benefit if there are a slew of $300,000 "starter homes" that all the people who have regular paying but very stable jobs -- non-profit professionals, teachers, postmen, city workers, accountants -- can buy. They are priced out of this market, and not silly enough to pay half a million dollars or more for a small 2-bedroom apt. in a fringe neighborhood instead of moving outside the city where less money can buy a nice house with a decent public school to send their kids. Cheap housing prices -- I mean authentically cheap, not "cheap for Brooklyn" because it's "only" a million dollars -- will keep them here, but not what we see here.

Posted by: CGfan at December 19, 2008 6:07 PM

Yes, Bay Ridge commutes can be, um, fungible. And in 2003, when we looked there, remuddled homes like this were 350-450k. The nicer ones -- without mauve wall to wall -- were 500k. I think this is a 500k house in 2008-09.

Posted by: Bolder at December 19, 2008 6:15 PM

W/ respect to 1094 park place, someone asked about the significance of Feb 28. I dont know, but it was in the craigslist ad for the open house.

http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/reb/963143551.html

Posted by: slick at December 19, 2008 6:28 PM

Wow Slick, if they mean what they say in that craigslist ad, that's pretty surprising. This place is amazing, kinda makes me wish I were in the market. I bet somebody will offer 999k by new years, and if they get it for that, in ten years be glad they did.

Posted by: Frederick Law Homestead at December 19, 2008 6:42 PM

The Park Place place looks like the "Please Don't Eat the Daisies" mansion. Wouldn't it be funny to do a remake of the Doris Day-David Niven movie with a house in a Black neighborhood in Brooklyn? It would sort of update the whole plot.

Posted by: sam at December 19, 2008 8:59 PM

vinnie_barbarino : True vinn. But they did a real nice job with the doors and It still is PS58. I think they get 1.6 mill that's if someone was lending money.

Posted by: sebb at December 20, 2008 1:10 AM

Wow, they must really need to close. I know the house has been through several brokerages, and has been on the market for around 2 years. If I could offer $999K, and close on it, I'd do it, too.

CGFan, I actually agree with you. I think super expensive homes like this skew the market in my neighborhood way too high. That said, with the cat out of the bag, so to speak, in terms of most houses in CH, the lowest I've seen is still around $600K, for a small 3 story on an ok block, on up to this one, and similar one of a kind mansions, of which there are several for sale now. Who knows what's going to happen I would love for the market to go where true middle class people could afford to buy.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at December 20, 2008 1:14 AM

I wrote about the commute being about 45 minutes to an hour. yes we live very close to the subway. So if you buy close the the subway, you too can have a short commute.

Posted by: italiana71 at December 20, 2008 8:50 AM

Following up on CGFan and Montrose:

I've been looking for houses in CH, and yes, you can barely get a rundown 3 story for $600K. That is a lot of money, especially if you start to compare prices to nearby suburbs.

Maplewood, NJ is a great example of a small suburb town with good schools. 30 Min commute to Penn Station. Beautiful renovated houses within a 5 minute walk of the train station are going for $400K - 500K. They have fallen from about $600-700K. (Of course, property taxes are a few thousand higher than Brooklyn.)

Those prices are also too high compared to rents. Rents in CH are low. Even renovated apartments command a fraction of apartments elsewhere.

I still think 1094 is an amazing house. But if it does go for 999K, maybe that will ripple down to other less desirable properties and force price cuts, which could only be good for the area.

Posted by: theandrewlee at December 20, 2008 9:02 AM

theandreewlee, I know more than a few families who have moved from Carroll Gardens (renting) to Maplewood when they wanted to buy. And if not Maplewood, somewhere else other than Brooklyn. They loved Brooklyn, and would have moved to neighborhoods like Crown Heights had they been cheap, but they were already much too expensive. They likely would have been willing to do the hard work of trying to improve the local public schools in the neighborhood and living with the lack of amenities if they could have purchased an appealing home for less than in Maplewood. But when the choice is paying 30% more for a fixer upper that then needs another $100,000 more in renovations plus no amenities versus buying a nice home you can actually afford in a pleasant NJ town with good schools, the choice is a no-brainer. Despite being long-time Brooklyn residents, they haven't drunk the "Brooklyn or bust" kool-aid and aren't blinded enough to overpay for the so-called "cachet" of claiming they live in Brooklyn instead of NJ. But then, I've been living in Brooklyn since the time when residents were dismissed as the "bridge and tunnel" crowd, Manhattan friends wouldn't visit, Williamsburg was a place you'd go to only if you wanted kosher meat, and it was far from cool to live here. It's not Brooklyn that's special, it's finding an affordable home in a community of like-minded people. If I were looking now, I'd have a much better shot at finding that in Queens or New Jersey.

Posted by: CGfan at December 20, 2008 11:00 AM

It's easy enough to trash talk houses based on pictures, but I went out of curiosity to the open house at 1094 Park Place. Easily the most impressive house I've ever seen for sale in Brooklyn (never saw the Connolly mansion inside, but if this were on PPW it would be going for 8 million also). Amazing level of historic detail (like carved reliefs, a half dozen stained glass windows, oak columns and parquet floors, several fireplaces, and every door in the place was solid heavy oak) and a totally modern chef's kitchen, everything updated. The turreted master bedroom windows look directly out at the stained glass windows of a 19th century synagogue next door and across the street to Brower Park. And the garden is beautiful. It's got a freakin' waterfall and a fish pond! The block is totally intact with period homes, and this place is the crown jewel. Yes, the Albany Houses are at the far end of a long block, but I really don't see it being an issue. If I were in the market and they'd take a million dollars for it, this place would be an absolutely astonishing home. The broker said she'd gotten some lowball offers, but I'm telling you, if someone came in with a serious offer at a million I bet they'd take it. AMAZING house. And apparently the huge lot's unused FAR makes it (or would have made it, in another economy) under threat of demolition. I really hope somebody who will love this place steps up.

Posted by: Frederick Law Homestead at December 20, 2008 2:43 PM

I like 1094, but I just cant envision living there.

Under the right circumstances, I'd buy in crown heights, but right now the economics of it dont make sense.

If nothing else, I'll be monitoring it b/c it will provide a comp for any other house of note in the area.

Posted by: slick at December 21, 2008 3:19 AM

I just google mapped 1094.
What are those 9 HUGE ASS buildings 2 blocks west?

Posted by: jasetheace at December 21, 2008 8:38 AM

"But when the choice is paying 30% more for a fixer upper that then needs another $100,000 more in renovations plus no amenities versus buying a nice home you can actually afford in a pleasant NJ town with good schools, the choice is a no-brainer."

A perfectly reasonable choice, but IMO far too subjective to be a "no brainer". It all depends on your priorities. I'm sure Maplewood is very nice and the right choice for many, but I also know I could never be happy there. Yr pays yr money and yr gets yr cherce :-)

Posted by: Bob Marvin at December 21, 2008 11:14 AM

What is all this crap about things being so much cheaper in the suburbs? My husband and I were forced to relocate to the suburbs do to a change in our professional circumstances (firm moved to CT). Forget trying to find a house as lovely as the one we had in Brooklyn for a similiar price in a nice neighborhood with great schools. It is MORE expensive in many desirable 'burbs, relatively speaking. I thought we'd have our pick of places, but that was not the case. Granted we were looking in CT and Westchester, not Jersey... Jersey was not an option for us.

Posted by: Architerrorist at December 21, 2008 1:08 PM

Architerrorist

I totally disagree with you re pricing. My wife and I lived in Brooklyn, and started looking for a house. The cheapest brownstones we could find in Boerum Hill, Park Slope or B'lyn Heights cost between $1.8 and $2 million -- and that was for houses that needed full renovations. We ended up buying in Westchester for less than $1.5 Million, and got a 4000 SF house that was built around the turn of the century, was fully updated about 6 years ago (to our taste, luckily), with a big yard. Granted our property taxes are higher here than in B'lyn, but we don't pay city taxes anymore, so it is about a wash. We do miss the restuarants and the like from B'lyn, but we love our home, and simply could not have afforded something comparable in Blyn. And, it is only 30 minutes on the train to Grand Central.

Posted by: Splenda at December 21, 2008 1:48 PM

I doubt anyone is still reading this but my wife and I just came back from the Flatbush house (Martense St), and I gotta admit: we're pretty tempted. The house is in good condition, new floors, new windows, etc. It's not falling apart. The basement apartment is currently rented month-to-month for $700, which could theoretically be raised since it hasn't changed in at least five years.

I'm a little worried that the market is going to take a nosedive and I'll end up paying close to $500k for something that's only going to be worth like $350 in two years, but at the same time the prospect of actually owning our own home is incredibly appealing.

Anyone have any thoughts on the cost?

Posted by: cwbuecheler at December 21, 2008 4:43 PM

cwbuecheler, congratulations on finding a house you like. As long as it's something you can easily afford, in a neighborhood you like and would be willing to live in that house for many years, what happens to the housing market over the next few years is less important.

However, the Flatbush house listing seems to say it is a one-family with a basement with "summer kitchen", which tells me this is an illegal apartment, so you should go in knowing that your rental income could very easily be nothing, not more than the $700 the tenant is paying now. And, if it is indeed an illegal rental, you really might not want the risk or hassle of having a tenant at all. I'd advise against it, in fact, it's just not worth it.

So, if you do like it, make an offer that assumes no rental income and is whatever you can afford to pay, not a stretch. It's very possible, in this market, that it will be accepted, and if not, I promise you there will be another house out there for you eventually -- it just means this one wasn't the right one. Good luck.

Posted by: CGfan at December 21, 2008 5:53 PM

Splenda - We're clearly not living in the same Westchester.

Posted by: Architerrorist at December 21, 2008 7:00 PM

CGfan - Thanks very much for the advice! I thought there was a good chance that the basement apartment was illegal. We'd consider putting in the necessary work to make it legal -- it has its own entrance and everything so I don't think it'd take too much, but we'd have to look into it. The fortunate thing is that my wife and I could afford the mortgage even without the rental income, so while we wouldn't feel good about evicting someone, if we felt we had to do it to avoid illegality, we at least wouldn't have to worry financially.

The neighborhood is not bad. While we'd be a bit out of place given that it's overwhelmingly black populated, and we're white, I don't think it would be anything too problematic. Hopefully people would accept us as just another couple trying to own their own place. We're not trying to flip the house or anything. We're looking for a place where we can put down some roots.

We'd miss the restaurants and bars of Park Slope ... but they're a short subway ride away, so maybe that's not so bad.

Anyway, we're still considering and this one will probably go before we could make a move on it anyway - supposedly they've had two offers already - but thanks again for the info. :)

Posted by: cwbuecheler at December 21, 2008 7:13 PM

I'm reading CW.

Where will prices be in 2 years? Flat or lower, but how much lower, I have no idea. If you are buying as a long-term home, then it's not as much of an issue.

But how well do you know that area? I've walked around the blocks between Flatbush and Nostrand down there. That far down, Nostrand at night feels unsafe to me. And I wouldn't be comfortable having my wife walk alone. You have to consider that.

Posted by: theandrewlee at December 21, 2008 9:05 PM

Architerrorist-

Where did you ultimately buy? All I can say is that we saw tons of houses that fit the description i gave of our home in New Rochelle, White Plains, etc... Scarsdale was more money though. All I can really vouch for is our house, which like I said was built around the turn of the century, has been redone beautifully (while retaining period details, like stained glass, original floors, fireplaces, etc.), on over a 1/2 acre, etc. All for less than a brownstone in Park Slope needing a full gut would have cost.

Posted by: Splenda at December 22, 2008 12:38 AM

Northeastern Westchester made the most sense for us, in terms of commuting. 2 acre lots, far less housing stock compared with down south...proximity to Greenwhich. $$$$. A million dollars buys you a split level that needs work. I thought we'd be able to cash out a little bit more. However, I am including the taxes in our monthly mortgage expenses. That said, our car insurance and home owners insurance has been halved.

Posted by: Architerrorist at December 22, 2008 9:02 AM

Also, I have kids and would not have considered New Rochelle or White Plains, due to the public schools. The quality of the public schools was a major factor as well. If we were going to be forced out of the city (where our kids managed to attend excellent to good amazing excellent public schools. And you pay for that in Westchester and Fairfield. Not just in terms of school taxes, but it's also reflected in the house prices.

If Pelham Manor had not involved commuting on 95 everyday, I would have seriously considered it. Love the architecture, and the town vibe. And the schools are fantastic. Although the $25K a year taxes are not so great.

Posted by: Architerrorist at December 22, 2008 9:06 AM

> "What are those 9 HUGE ASS buildings 2 blocks west?"

Those are the Albany Houses:

- http://www.nyc.gov/html/nycha/html/developments/bklynalbany.shtml

Albany I Houses – consists of two developments, Albany and Albany II. Albany has 824 apartments in six 14-story buildings on 8.92-acres in Brooklyn. Completed on October 2, 1950, the complex houses an estimated 1,965 residents and is bordered by Albany, St. Marks and Troy Avenues and Park Place.

Albany II Houses has 396 apartments housing an estimated 944 residents in three buildings, 13 and 14-stories tall. Albany Houses, Troy and Albany Avenues and Bergen Street border the complex on 4.93-acres in Brooklyn. It was completed January 31, 1957.

Posted by: SnarkSlope at December 22, 2008 10:38 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions