« Choice Greene in Full Gear Co-op of the Day: 195 Prospect Park West »
December 16, 2008
Last Week's Biggest Sales

1. PARK SLOPE $8,450,000
17 Prospect Park West GMAP (left)
As covered last week, the 5,200-square-foot mansion owned by Jennifer Connelly and Paul Bettany sold for a hair below its asking price, $8.5 mil. It hit the market in late January. Entered into contract on 6/1/08; closed on 11/17/08; deed recorded on 12/10/08.
2. PARK SLOPE $1,800,000
547 9th Street GMAP (right)
Also old news: This three-story limestone house went for $200,000 more than its original asking price. Entered into contract on 5/8/08; closed on 8/11/08; deed recorded on 12/8/08.
3. WINDSOR TERRACE $1,800,000 $1,490,000
272 Windsor Place GMAP
When it was an Open House Pick in late February, the two-family house's sellers were looking for $1,595,000. Entered into contract on 6/11/08; closed on 11/26/08; deed recorded on 12/9/08.
4. MIDWOOD $1,362,500
2401 Avenue O GMAP
Detached, 2,971-sf single-family house on a 4,500-sf lot, according to Property Shark. Entered into contract on 6/23/08; closed on 11/25/08; deed recorded on 12/12/08.
5. BATH BEACH $1,310,000
115 Bay 29th Street GMAP
DOB records indicate that this is a new construction, three-family house. Entered into contract on 9/19/08; closed on 11/24/08; deed recorded on 12/12/08.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/7647
Comments
Can you at least put one house in the mix
normal people (and not real estate agents) can relate to?
thank you
Posted by: dutchman at December 16, 2008 11:43 AM
Dutch....then it wouldn't be the the biggest sales.
2 of the 5 houses went for over ask?????
WTF
Posted by: bayridgegirl at December 16, 2008 11:48 AM
Dutch--as BRG says this feature is biggest sales. Though it might be interesting to have a feature that was "reasonably priced sales of the week" or something. A feature that would highlight sales in other price ranges and describe the sales process (how long on market, original ask vs sales price etc).
Posted by: wasder at December 16, 2008 12:03 PM
Brownstoner: love the contract dates. Thank you.
Posted by: Polemicist at December 16, 2008 12:12 PM
Oh well, they were all bought for living in and not for flipping, so I don't suppose it matters too much.
Posted by: dittoburg at December 16, 2008 12:25 PM
Old news, indeed. The current market will only start to be reflected in 2009 closings - anything that went into contract Oct 08 onwards...Declines are just starting!
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 12:34 PM
we dont know they dont want to flip these.
who wants to buy something for 1.8 million that goes down in value?
Posted by: Santa at December 16, 2008 12:42 PM
"The current market will only start to be reflected in 2009 closings - anything that went into contract Oct 08 onwards...Declines are just starting!"
It's going to be so obvious when Miss Muffett (finally) buys a home. From that day forward, she will immediately start telling us each day how she's certain home prices are about to skyrocket.
Posted by: Biff Champion at December 16, 2008 12:46 PM
Wrong, Biff. I've said many times we're not trying to time the market bottom. I am very aware that we may buy while prices are still going down but if we find the place we love, at a reasonable price we can afford, we will buy even if the market has further down to go. It may take many years for this market to bottom out (last NYC downturn lasted many years too). I won't worry about that too much since we intend to stay in next place for life - but at the same time, no way will I pay today's ridiculous prices when it's so clear that cuts are coming in the future.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 1:09 PM
once again: buyers and sellers can and do renegotiate contracts if they wish or walk away if they no longer like the deal they struck. see, e.g., http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/realestate/14deal2.html?_r=1&ref=realestate
therefore, just like longer periods from contract to closing and deals that fall apart, current closing prices certainly do reflect the current state of the market.
Posted by: i disagree at December 16, 2008 1:14 PM
MM-the reason the last NYC downturn took so long to recover was that there was a huge amount of supply. 1 bedrooms and studios no one wanted. No one wanted to move here either.Not so this time.Less than a 1 yr.supply. And if you are going to stay in your place for life why the hell do you care what the market is going to do in the next few years, seems like you should find a place you like and can afford and buy it already. Do you have a hard time picking out cereal at the store?
Posted by: billyboomer at December 16, 2008 1:26 PM
"I disagree" - why would the seller want to renegotiate in these instances?
Posted by: dittoburg at December 16, 2008 1:30 PM
I pick cereal very quickly thank you very much. Just don't want to pay a crazy price when I am literally seeing price cuts in the hundreds of thousands for some properties we've looked at (but rejected for other criteria). There is basically unanimity that prices will go down in 2009, and possibly through to 2010 and beyond. We only sold a few months ago, and the meltdown happened, so we're just actively looking, but not rushing. We have a list of flexible criteria for the property we're seeking, of which price is just one element - but since price impacts so many other parts of our lives - esp time spent with our kids! (big mortgage = more hours working to pay the bills), price is a major criteria, esp in an environment when prices are headed down.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 1:36 PM
"I disagree" - these sales DO NOT reflect current market conditions. The sellers could just have said no to any renegotiation. The buyers could walk away, but lose the 10% deposit. Does not happen too often.
I want to see contracts that were signed after November 1 to get a true reading of the market. Then we will know if the market is slightly declining or tumbling.
Posted by: Suburbandude at December 16, 2008 1:40 PM
I should add that I only started to see real price cuts on some properties (probably with more serious sellers) in the last few weeks but the vast majority of properties are still wildly overpriced and thus not moving. Suburbandude is right - it's very hard to renegotiate after you've signed a contrct so main recourse for buyers who went into contract pre-meltdown and got cold feet is to back out and lose deposit. Some are starting to do that (figuring they will do better waiting out price declines) but for many people, that's too bitter a pill to swallow. But yes, contracts signed after Nov 1 will be a much better barometer than things that went into contract pre-meltdown. Just look at how drastically and suddenly other assets have lost value - who knows what's going to happen to NY RE?
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 1:53 PM
the deposit plays some role, of course, and it does give the seller some power. but if a rational buyer thinks the price for a substitute home (all in) will drop by more than 10% within the timeframe he wants to buy, he will walk away if he doesn't get a discount that makes him whole. a rational seller will agree to renegotiate if she also believes that the market will decline more than 10% within the timeframe she wants or needs to sell, because she's out money even with the deposit in her pocket. so these prices are reflective, at least within 10%.
Posted by: i disagree at December 16, 2008 1:55 PM
Most people won't just walk away from their deposit even if in a perfectly efficient marketit makes sense for them to do so economically. Having to find a new place, the inevitable emotional attachment, and good old fashioned honor can all go a long way in overwhelming economic benefit. In addition, when you are dealing in the $1 - $2 million range, it is entirely possible that buyers really can't afford to lose their entire deposit and still have enough to comfotably put down another 10% deposit even at a 20% discount.
Posted by: Ledbury at December 16, 2008 2:08 PM
Ledbury is spot on. Walking away is very difficult. As someone in that price range, I can tell you that the idea of losing a 10% deposit would be a major problem to me and indeed, would have eaten a very big chunk out of our budget to buy something else, even at a 20% discount. Precisely since we intend to stay for life, had we gone into contract pre-meltdown, we would have just sucked it up and moved on. But I would have been very bummed to see values go down another 20%+ after buying (and some say they could go down as much as 50%). Now that it's clear prices are heading south, and that the economy is so scary, I've recalibrated my budget and tolerance for ridiculous prices.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 2:15 PM
So "I disagree" - your theory that these prices reflect the current state of the market is depdnent on buyers and sellers behaving rationally.
I think I see a flaw.
Posted by: dittoburg at December 16, 2008 2:32 PM
Miss Muffett : every time someone sells a house and gets asking or more than you loose money. How does it feel? you are losing everyday but that's what happens to gamblers.
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 2:32 PM
Miss Muffett : Here sweety this is for you.
http://www.gamblersanonymous.org/
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 2:34 PM
Sebb - every time I house I looked at gets a price cut, I save money. This is what is happening more and more, and will accelerate next year.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 2:41 PM
nope, not spot on. did you not read the article i cited? if buyers and sellers share your belief about where the market is headed (and i'm talking about miss muffett's 50% here), you'd have to believe that buyers are irrational idiots who would let the factors you mention "overwhelm" them. and if the market is going there, sellers would also have to be insane not to negotiate somewhere in that range, as that's real money for them, too.
i agree that the real estate market is not perfectly efficient, which is one reason i don't think it's tanking in quite the scale and timing the way some others seem to think it is. but i do not think the buyers of these places were idiots - i think these sales show us the buyers and the sellers certainly do not share 50% drop predictions and probably not anywhere close to it.
Posted by: i disagree at December 16, 2008 2:45 PM
Wow, deja vu. I'm starting to wonder if these comments are real or if someone is just cutting and pasting comments from any of the 3 months prior. Brownstoner is starting to be a spoof of itself.
Posted by: squaredrive at December 16, 2008 2:49 PM
I'm not sure at all that the market is going to drop 50% - only that some think that's certainly possible. If it were only to drop 20%, then I'd probably have stayed in my contract and have overpaid rather than deal with all headaches Ledbury cites which make markets inefficient. No one knows for sure where the market is going so in some respects, everyone is gambling (that's the nature of the marketplace). But there is way more evidence supporting large price declines than any other scenario right now. In fact, it seems certain (and not a gamble at all) that prices are going down. The only gamble is how much, how long.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 2:57 PM
Come on. Prime Brownstone Market is not A TOLL Bros. developement in a corn field in Ohio. This market is only affordable to the rich. The price drops that Miss Muffets wants is not going to happen. The rich are going to pull their money from the stock market and have cash on hand in the near future, sure prices will drop on some houses. Limited supply, demand is still there, some are sitting and waiting granted but that will turn around soon. Brownstone Brooklyn is desirable, more than ever,better than a condo on 4th. Ave. Real Estate in prime areas is a great investment, and now with such low interest rates, is even more so. Crap I wish I had a bunch of cash on hand I would be ready to buy next year.
Posted by: billyboomer at December 16, 2008 3:04 PM
"Sure prices will drop on some houses" - and I will buy one.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 3:18 PM
Its already happening MM. Get to it. Rates are low, now is your chance, Come on do it do it do it, you know you want to. Come on stop trying to predict the future, no one can, except me. DO IT Spend money spend money do it do it. and you took my quote out of context.
Posted by: billyboomer at December 16, 2008 3:22 PM
Our mortgage will be low (mostly cash purchase - don't want to be a slave to my mortgage) so I don't care that much about rates - low purchase price is more important to me, and prices are still way too high on most places. That is indeed starting to change, but only *just* starting. Looking forward to 2009.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 3:26 PM
Billyboomer,
I don't mean to be rude, but you make it sound like EVERYONE in the region dreams of living in a brownstone. Sure, I like these townhouses and wouldn't mind living in one and appreciate the architectural details, but brownstones are overrated on this forum, IMO. Brownstone-mania of a select few has little effect on overall demand and, as any other mania, it comes and goes...
Posted by: Gravis at December 16, 2008 3:34 PM
I disagree - are you serious with that article? First off, any one off anecdotes is hardly representative of anything. And second, this one off in particular is not representative. You are talking about a) a second home bought b) at the end of that long day of househunting (insinuating that this was not your typical weeks/months long search.)
If your argument that those in the market for investment properties and second homes are more likely to walk away in these times, then that might be reasonable. But there is nothing to suggest that these houses, which you are basing your further conclusion on, fall into that camp.
Most people just don't walk away from their deposit for any number of number of reasons even if they know they are overpaying. Its really that simple.
Posted by: Ledbury at December 16, 2008 3:40 PM
As much as I abhor MM's constant endless repetition of the same old story, anyone who buys now - or actually anyone who bought anytime after August, 2007 when the first subprime news started really coming out - is either independently wealthy or woefully clueless.
Posted by: gkw at December 16, 2008 3:46 PM
MM - What do you think is a reasonable $/SF cost for a pslope house/brownstone? You say prices are too high still, so you must have a target range in mind. Just curious.
Posted by: squaredrive at December 16, 2008 3:51 PM
I've never really understood the rationale on here that somehow Brownstone Brooklyn real estate is immune from everything that is going on right now. Anyone care to explain this to me? (seriously, i'm not trying to be snarky)
Posted by: A Guest at December 16, 2008 3:53 PM
if rates hit 5%, the new york real estate market stabilizes.
if rates hit 4.5%, the market climbs back to 2007-08 prices.
if rates hit 4%, the market jumps to new highs.
if jim cramer is right and it hits 3.5%, watch out!
Posted by: Ringo at December 16, 2008 3:55 PM
billyboomer: you are 100% correct. The mortgage rate is going to 3.5% eat your heart out Muffett
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 4:00 PM
Rates are going to 3.5% why because the Fed will do what ever it has to do
Posted by: sebb at December 16, 2008 4:15 PM
yes, i'm serious with that article. you say it's not going to happen, and i'm saying it's happening. you say "most people don't" with no evidence, and i've showed that some people, in fact, already did. you suggest that these people were somehow more rational with their money because it's a second home, and i'm saying that anyone buying a $1m-$2m house in brooklyn whether for living or for investment isn't going to so cavalierly ignore what's going on in the markets such that we should entirely discount these closing prices. you honestly think that if the buyer thought the market was going to tank by 50% that he would go through with it? that's not just overpaying - that's a million dollars.
Posted by: i disagree at December 16, 2008 4:42 PM
Rates may be going negative --that's what saved the Japan property market...not. To those of you celebrating the fed as your cavalry, what's happened is the fed is now out of bullets, and has yet to stave off deflation. Literally, nothing is left to bail out over-leveraged homeowners, short of a direct purchase of your collapsing asset at an artificial price by the government. I'm sure you'll be begging for that next.
Posted by: Whuh at December 16, 2008 5:05 PM
miss muffett-- i think that one thing that has changed dramatically from 10 years ago is that made it possible for many to buy brownstones or limestones or brick townhouses, etc.. (including myself) was that you were able to buy a fixer upper in cobble hill, carroll gardens, park slope for $500K and a decent renovated one for between $650-$750, and even in 1996, those areas were certainly gentrified, or italian enough to very safe and had good schools to boot.
now, these homes have tripled or quadrupled (way past average gains in incomes), and the areas that still offer homes at the lower prices are in "less desirable" areas that may not be safe and may have bad or very bad schools.
i'm not sure what your target price is or where you want to live, but for me, I personally would prefer to have the square footage in my chosen area over a historic home in an area that i consider to be a safety or gentrification risk, ie: that it will not gentrify to a place that suits my lifestyle needs.
what is your criteria, out of curiosity?
Posted by: wine lover at December 16, 2008 5:21 PM
Mr B the contract dates speak volumes about the CURRENT market. Thanks for the brilliant addition.
Posted by: pierre de taille at December 16, 2008 5:23 PM
Hi Everyone,
I'm all confused on the economy but I addressing the previous comment, what is the "artificial price" the government might set on that 8-point-something million dollar house? I'm curious. Does anyone think it will be pennies on the dollar?!!! I will allow myself a simple: Eeekkkk!!!
;-)
ms bg
PS to Miss Muffet
Even if prices fall quiet a bit and we have deflation, how will you be able to protect your money? Are you spreading it out in various savings/checking accounts?
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at December 16, 2008 5:23 PM
"if jim cramer is right..."
Whew, at least we won't have to worry about that ever happening.
Posted by: SnarkSlope at December 16, 2008 5:44 PM
BG - cash spread out in FDIC insured accts is very safe, and while interest rates are low, it's growing a bit - probably the only place where money is growing right now!
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 5:47 PM
"italian enough to very safe" -- unless you didn't happen to be in the wrong family! Seriously, I wouldn't ever have felt safe in Howard Beach for example, and when I lived on Kane St in the late 1980s (around the corner from what was known as the Gotti block because so many of his relatives lived on it) I felt safe, but was worried for the safety of some of my friends.
Posted by: babs at December 16, 2008 6:00 PM
gwk, I am buying right now. Where I most want to live (Bushwick) prices have already dropped 40 percent since late 2006. I'm not saying they won't drop more, just that they're already affordable.
Posted by: mopar at December 16, 2008 6:34 PM
I think miss muffett is right -- if I were in her shoes, I wouldn't buy now unless I found an amazing bargain, which is exactly what she said she is doing. Some of the posters on here, especially Sebb, seem oddly upbeat about a housing market that every rational expert has said is due for a correction. Prices are way out of whack right now -- there was no good reason for my brownstone in Carroll Gardens to triple in price since in the 7 years since I bought it, and I expect that in a year, it will be worth a good 50% less than its inflated current value. I lived here during the 80s and 90s and remember well the housing decline -- I have friends who had to move away from the city and lost money on properties for 5 or 6 years before they could finally sell for the price of their outstanding mortgage in the late '90s. Sure, it turned out that had they waited an extra few years, they would have made alot of money, but when you are paying for a 2nd home you can't sell, you are pretty happy just to get out without any debt. Any the bubble we've experience since 2001 or so is far worse than the bubble in the '80s, and the fall will be far harder.
Posted by: CGfan at December 16, 2008 7:17 PM
A possible problem for someone like mm is that while inventory may be up, I'm guessing a lot of it is troubled properties with desperate owners. Not to say there aren't a few diamonds out there, but in a rising market you also find sellers seeing an opportunity to cash out, whereas they might just wait out a slump.
But yeah, generally I don't think this is a good time to buy unless you fall in love with a home. I'd like to give Obama his 100 days first.
Posted by: Bolder at December 16, 2008 8:09 PM
squaredrive - hard to say what a "reasonable $/sf is for a pslope house/brownstone" since houses vary a lot in terms of what kind of condition they are in. Many homes, even if in good condition on the surface, still need some renovation since the chances are good that the electric/plumbing is old, exterior may need some touch-ups, etc. Plus, many of the homes we've looked at still have funky layouts that are inefficient, and rejiggering is costly. That said, I think $500/sf is generous for most houses, with a discount if it needs more than the typical amount of work.
As for my criteria, wine lover, we are not seeking anything very grand - just a decent amount of space for us (ideally about 2000 sf) with or without rental income, depending on dimensions, price, etc. We love old detail but could forgo it if necessary. Location is important to us since we have a child in school and don't want to move too far, plus we want the house to be in a good school zone for our other child in case sibling variances go out the window with the crowding problems plaguing our schools. We'd love to stay under 1.5 mil all in, though given scary economy, closer to the 1 mil end than the 1.5 would be more comfortable, but we'll see where prices go...
And Bolder, if you've been following this blog, you'll see that on 1st Street in Park Slope alone, many houses have recently hit the market that are hardly troubled properties. In fact, inventory is starting to creep up even in prime areas (and some houses have started aggressively slashing prices from ridiculous starting points), and I suspect this trend will grow next year.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at December 16, 2008 10:22 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.