« Co-op of the Day: Another 1BR at 193 Clinton Avenue Streetlevel: Mediterranean on 6th Avenue »
November 26, 2008
House of the Day: 271 Stratford Road

The owners of 271 Stratford Road in Beverley Square West paid $985,000 for this three-story house just a year ago. It sounds like they may have performed some renovations in the meantime. To our eyes, the kitchen and bathrooms don't quite match the lovely details of the first floor, but they're certainly passable. Renovations or not, the question remains whether this place will really be able to fetch the current asking price of $1,125,000 in this market. Seems aggressive, but you never know.
271 Stratford Road [Mary Kay Gallagher] GMAP P*Shark
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/7343
Comments
Seems wildly overpriced to me. This money pit with only two bathrooms should be no more than $650,000.
Beverly Square West? Give it a rest, it's Flatbush!
Posted by: Inigo at November 26, 2008 1:19 PM
I don't see any pictures of the kitchen.
Posted by: dt at November 26, 2008 1:22 PM
Yes, to advertise a "brand new kitchen" and not have pix doesn't bode well...
Posted by: tinarina at November 26, 2008 1:29 PM
Cute house...but note 1.125m cute.
I hope that bathroom is not new, because it needs help.
Posted by: bayridgegirl at November 26, 2008 1:35 PM
These homes remind me of the suburbs - really not urban feeling at all, and I mean that as a compliment. But that's a big price increase during a period when prices started to go down.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 26, 2008 1:48 PM
Seller may have to settle for a mansion tax avoiding $999,999
Posted by: Bklnite at November 26, 2008 1:55 PM
www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2008/01/just_sold_in_br_87.php
Posted by: Bklnite at November 26, 2008 2:13 PM
I really don't understand the pricing of anything these days. The NYT reports housing at drop on par with 1991 and sellers/brokers are pricing as if 2008 was an extension of the upward curve. Can someone explain this insanity?!?
Posted by: househunt at November 26, 2008 2:19 PM
I think they should be able to get what they paid a year ago, since they've done some cosmetic work. But I doubt they'll get any more than that.
Posted by: shillstoner at November 26, 2008 2:24 PM
^^^QOTD
Posted by: bayridgegirl at November 26, 2008 2:25 PM
househunt - it's called denial. Some sellers just can't believe the party's over, though other are starting, slowly, to accept the new reality. That's why you saw, in yesterday's "last week's biggest sales" a Park Slope house that hit market at 3.2mil and sold for nearly 1million less. If you follow market closely, you will see more and more price cuts, since any seller that's serious pretty much has to cut price these days, sometimes drastically if they were too aggressive at first. This is all classic behavior at the end of a bubble. There is a peak, then a stand-off as sellers don't want to accept the changed reality but buyers refuse to pay the high prices. So for a while transactions really slow down. But eventually the weakest sellers cave, other sellers start to accept new pricing levels, and new comps are established. Everyone agrees prices will readjust soon, and are just starting to.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 26, 2008 2:31 PM
This money pit will sell for $650k about the same time that Park Slope Brownstones go back to selling for $1mil instead of $2mil. (And the way things are going, you never know)
In the comments from the post when the house sold for $985k...
"BTW, this house needed complete gut reno, had limited original detail, and no kitchen... That's why it sold for under a million. Houses with more interesting architecture, loads of detail and recent renos sell for a whole lot more."
Asking $140k more than previous purchase after renovations, doesn't sound overly aggressive, or like an extension of an upward curve - more like an attempt to break even. (Which may be tough in these times)
Posted by: Bklnite at November 26, 2008 2:31 PM
Wow, that's a bummer for these sellers then, since they will almost certainly lose money after fees. Unfortunately, I think there will be more and more people in that situation. I truly hope most sellers during this period will be folks who bought earlier and so won't suffer real losses.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 26, 2008 2:50 PM
I wonder why they have to sell. It may have been an investment rather than a home.
Why sell your home if you just have to buy another one? Percentage wise most people that HAVE to sell wont be in prime areas. I'm not sure that I regard this as prime.
Most people won’t lose their jobs, get divorced or run into the sort of big financial difficulties that cause the sale of a home. A small percentage of them will. If unemployment rises to 8.5%, 3% more people won’t have a job. This will definitely move the market a bit but not a lot.
Different scenario in areas where there was a lot of leveraged speculation.
Posted by: Aussie at November 26, 2008 3:13 PM
Aussie - what about people who decide to downsize in this climate? So, yeah, you may sell your big house cheaper but you can also buy a smaller apartment cheaper too. Maybe some people, during the good times, thought they could afford a lot more square footage and are now re-evaluating that and trying to make do with less. So many people I know are in nervous mode, wondering if they are going to lose their jobs, and trying to reduce their expenses. Housing is probably the biggest household budget item so maybe it makes sense that some people would decide to just move to smaller quarters?
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 26, 2008 3:18 PM
This house has already had a haircut. I believe the original ask was 1,180,000.
Posted by: Architerrorist at November 26, 2008 3:34 PM
Yea, it was 1,180,000 up until a couple weeks ago. We were very interested in it back in September but couldn't reach a deal. It's a cute house with lots of space, but not really a high end renovation. The kitchen is new, but wasn't finished when we saw it. The 2nd floor bathroom has a new vanity, but otherwise wasn't renovated. They did add a 2nd bathroom to the house on the third floor. The other big plus was that they have updated the mechanicals. All in all, a nice house that you could move right into, but you'd probably still want to make some updates over time.
Posted by: ppwgall at November 26, 2008 4:04 PM
We saw this house over the summer the same day as we saw a fully renovated home on Marlborough (that incidentally sold in a week). This house was not bad, and it is located just north of Cortelyou, which is really nice. I agree with the previous poster that the renovating was not that high-end. Still, it was clean, with new floors, new paint, and new bathrooms on the 2nd and 3rd floor. But there does remain a lot to do. They had a half-finished kitchen, which was very small at that, and no bathroom on the first floor. The entire front porch needs to be fixed (the wood is chipping away), and the garage in the back needs to be completely replaced. Additionally, the backyard needs work, in that the buyer would most likely want to put some kind of porch/balcony there. And who knows about the roof? Unfortunately for the sellers, in this market and given how much work still has to be done, I'd be shocked if they got even a million for it.
Posted by: cobble hill girl at November 26, 2008 4:22 PM
offer 230K and a 10 dollar coupon to bennigans.
Posted by: Xander Crews at November 26, 2008 4:32 PM
Muffy (your new name as of yesterday), down sizing seems so final. Human psyche says to me that people have to be forced to take this step. Like selling (anything) at a loss, it is something that only the informed and the most disciplined will do. Let’s face it, almost no-one is truly informed, and of the informed only very few are disciplined. Most have to be forced to sell even when it is in their best interest to do so. It's a lot like a margin call.
Lots of people are scared of losing their jobs, I agree, but a comparatively small number actually will. They will be the ones that sell their homes. ARMS could have played a similar role if people had found that they could not pay the new rate, but this bullet has been dodged to a large degree, for now. Speculation in prime areas happened but it was not rife.
DOW and lechacal have the confidence to sell and wait because they are so sure of the magnitude of the drop and they see a home as an investment. This is rare, comparatively. I have no confidence in any prediction of the magnitude, and there is the spectre of intervention.
I have lived through a number of downturns and owned prime and less than prime through them. It has always amazed me how the drops in prime locations are limited.
I know this is not want you want to hear (nor probably what you believe), but it is my experience as well as my opinion. It was taught to me by my father, ignored by me at my peril, and proven to be true in my own experience. It is not something that can be seen in statistics. There will be a drop but by nowhere near as much in prime areas as in other areas.
Posted by: Aussie at November 26, 2008 4:38 PM
Well Aussie, here's an anecdote. We recently placed a low-ball bid on a property in a very prime area. The realtor originally said the owner would not even deign to counter-offer. But recently, we were approached again to renew discussion very close to our lowball. So some prices, even in prime areas, are starting to drop a lot.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 26, 2008 4:57 PM
If you say so. Maybe they will drop equal to fringe areas. Good luck with your counter offer.
Posted by: Aussie at November 26, 2008 5:24 PM
So, Miss Muffett what is "low ball" these days? It seems that brokers price about 50,000 over and that's meant to be the deal. We tried negotiating this summer and we're told 3-5% was all they would move down. Is low ball 10% off asking? 15 or even 20%? Of course if the ask is still ridiculous, as in the case of this house, the perhaps it should be more. Anyway, just curious how you pierced the denial.
Posted by: househunt at November 26, 2008 6:18 PM
The house has vinyl siding. OK? It is a refugee from Bayone, NJ.
It will not be worth one million dollars for ten more years.
NEXT!
.....honestly, I think the economic downturn has been accepted as reality everywhere except on Brownstoner.
Posted by: Inigo at November 26, 2008 6:33 PM
househunt
"We tried negotiating this summer and we're told 3-5%"
Anything before Sept 15th 2008 is null and void.
Its a new world now.
No comps are relevant.
Im with you Muffy
Posted by: jasetheace at November 26, 2008 6:45 PM
Househunt - we offered a full 20% below ask, for a place that was not priced as insanely as some others, but obviously in our opinion still too high. Honestly, we're not even sure we want to buy this particular house, since we've reduced our budget (to be conservative, in case one of us finds our income takes a hit since anything is possible) and the house needs so much work that I'm a bit a worried about the renovation price wild card (who knows what lurks behind those old walls). But my point is that a seller who initially snubbed us is now asking us to come back to the table, which to me means they are rethinking the price to expect given the acceleration deterioration of economic conditions and confidence in the NYC RE market.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 26, 2008 7:19 PM
".....honestly, I think the economic downturn has been accepted as reality everywhere except on Brownstoner."
that's funny. I would say acceptance is universal at Brownstoner. The degree is up for discussion.
"Im with you Muffy"
All buyers are with Muffy... but Muffy may be joining the owners soon!
Posted by: Aussie at November 26, 2008 9:24 PM
The thing is, big old houses are expensive. I know this is an obvious point, but still. There is a stupid movie, "Don't Eat the Daisies" that is mostly notable for the fabulous Connecticut wreck that Doris Day and Richard Niven and their brood move into. When one of their kids remarks that "this house is so big!", Richard Niven explains, "we couldn't afford a smaller one." In a downturn, this point becomes true again. I love Victorian flatbush, but the fact that it's far from Manhattan and not cheap to heat may become a factor.
Posted by: Heather at November 26, 2008 9:26 PM
Aussie - I'm not so sure how quickly I'll be (re)joining the owners camp. Yes, we've put out a bid here and there, but inventory is so slim that we have not found anything we really love. And, whereas this past summer I was prepared to "stretch" to buy the house I love, I've definitely canceled all "stretching" plans. Our goal up to now was to keep our mortgage very similar to what it used to be, or perhaps a bit more. Now, if anything, I'd like it to be smaller than it was previously, just because it would be terrifying to have a larger mortgage and find that our incomes become victim to all that's going on - it's starting to happen to too many people I know. Of course, many people will keep their jobs, but many people will lose them too, or suffer wage stagnation, even income cuts (i.e. less work at same or even lower rate). I sincerely hope we'll luck out and find something sooner rather than later and as I've stated repeatedly, we're not waiting for a bottom per se, but I'm certainly in no rush to buy. The next year or two will see continuing declines that will more than make up for our rental expenses, and I do think that after this initial stand-off/lock-down period, more inventory will hit the market, at adjusted prices.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 26, 2008 10:00 PM
I saw this house a couple of weeks ago; I saw it also earlier this summer. I think it is a flip gone wrong. There is no evidence that anyone has really been living there, although apparently someone has been house-sitting. The renovations are low end. For example, in the summer there was no kitchen sink, now there is one with barely enough room to fit a salad bowl. It is a simple and somewhat attractive house, but no great shakes for that area. What little has been done smacks of the flashy, but cheap, stuff that a flipper does.
Posted by: gidgetgoesbrooklyn at November 26, 2008 11:23 PM
I love Victorian Flatbush too. In fact, I've lived here for 29 years. Far from Manhattan? Today the "Q" got me from Avenue H station to 34th Street in about a half hour. Is that considered far? I don't think so. To have a house with a driveway, garage, finished basement, porch, working fireplace, etc. in the suburbs, if you could find it, would be much more expensive and much further away. We have great schools, some fantastic restaurants, two close by libraries, the Flatbush Food Co-op, etc, etc. Yes, if these houses are not properly insulated, they can cost a lot to heat. But we never have to look for parking (how much fuel is wasted doing that!) Would I trade this in for a brownstone to be 10 minutes closer to Manhattan, no way.
Posted by: evfred at November 26, 2008 11:37 PM
Miss Muffet - now you're cooking with gas!
20% off something not insanely priced means somewhere in the region of a third of the peak? Bide your time and you'll get what you want for the price you want.
Posted by: the chicken at November 27, 2008 12:44 PM
sorry - meant "a third off", not "a third of"!
Posted by: the chicken at November 27, 2008 12:44 PM
ps Happy Thanksgiving everybody!
(from a non-American)
Posted by: the chicken at November 27, 2008 12:45 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.