« A Mediterranean Makover And the Winners of the Red Hook Bike Competition Are... »
November 12, 2008
Has the Buyers' Market Come to Brooklyn? Duh.
HMS Associates released some dismal, but not surprising news yesterday: Average Brooklyn home prices dropped two percent to $695,285 in Q3 of 2008 (from $708,457 in 2007), as opposed to a three percent rise in the first quarter and an eight percent rise in the second; we had one percent more sales (from 988 to 999). Now for more not-very-surprising neighborhood breakdowns: prices were up in Brooklyn Heights and Prospect Heights and down in Sheepshead Bay, Greenpoint and Park Slope (well, maybe that's a wee bit surprising). The number of homes sold went up in Carroll Gardens, Williamsburg and Marine Park and went down in Greenpoint, Fort Greene, and Brooklyn Heights. Bed Stuy, East New York and Brownsville weren't included; had they been, the average prices would surely have been much lower. Poor Bed-Stuy was recently named by CNN as having one of the highest foreclosure rates in the country. We know our readers are very skeptical of numbers, but the authors of the study say they translate to one thing: a buyers' market. Agree?
Photo by bondidwhat.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/7151
Comments
I heard that the guy who did the wall in this pic did some stylish work on West 9th near Smith too.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 12, 2008 10:47 AM
now you're looking at tacky.
Posted by: cb6 at November 12, 2008 10:52 AM
This study lags badly. Q3 ends September 30th, so just about every contract was signed prior to the official start of the financial crisis. Q4 '08 and especially Q1 '09 will provide the real picture, which will be a total buyer's market - except nobody will be buying.
Posted by: Suburbandude at November 12, 2008 10:54 AM
Just wait six months longer to a year longer.
We haven't seen anything yet.
Posted by: IronBalls at November 12, 2008 10:54 AM
Can't comment. Just can't get over the "Mediterranean Mess" in the previous thread.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 10:55 AM
Drop, baby, drop! I look am holding out hope that I'll actually be able to buy sometime in the next few years.
Posted by: cwbuecheler at November 12, 2008 11:09 AM
cwbuecheler - you are a loser... Great job tool bag.
Posted by: THAL at November 12, 2008 11:19 AM
It would be interesting to see what kinds of homes in Brooklyn are being foreclosed upon. I would be willing to bet a majority are new construction, 3 family Fedders houses, concentrated on the fringes of BS. Corporations like United Homes, and many fly by night developer corporations with very convenient in house mortgage companies attached to them are being investigated for fraud and deceptive lending practices. They target minority first time homebuyers with low, low introductory rates, and smoke and mirrors. Two years later, the ARM's adjust and triple, and these people are out.
Ignorance is NOT bliss. There should be a law mandating a 5 hour home buying class, the way we mandate a driver safety class. Too many people got suckered, not because they wanted to be a statistic, but because they were told they could buy into the American dream of home ownership.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at November 12, 2008 11:19 AM
The fundamentals of this economy are essentially strong...
; )
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at November 12, 2008 11:21 AM
Hey THAL,
When you call someone a tool bag, just what does that mean? Its far more abstract than say, asshat.
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at November 12, 2008 11:25 AM
I agree that this report does not reflect the depth of the potential declines to come, given the rapid deterioration of the economy since this report data was gathered. As for PS going down, I don't think this is surprising at all, given how rapidly and astronomically it shot up. While many potential sellers may panic at this prospect, I'm not quite sure why unless they unwisely used their home as an ATM, or bought with an intention to flip fast. The vast majority of owners who have owned for more than 3-5 years should do fine. Just in this short period (since 2003) prices skyrocketed, so for them to plummet back down to the same levels they were at just a few years ago would leave many owners in the same place they were in a few years ago, but make property more affordable for new, 1st time buyers.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 11:25 AM
MM, that's a pretty good idea, and the climate is perfect for implementing such a requirement now. buying a home is a big, complicated transaction that isn't right for everyone.
Posted by: z at November 12, 2008 11:27 AM
If wanting to pay a reasonable price for a home somewhere within a 40 minute commute to my place of employment makes me a loser and a "tool bag", then I'm happy to be a loser and a tool bag.
I'm sorry for all the people who are losing money on their home values right now, but those of us in careers other than banking, medicine and law would like to own our homes, too.
Posted by: cwbuecheler at November 12, 2008 11:28 AM
"I would be willing to bet a majority are new construction, 3 family Fedders houses, concentrated on the fringes of BS. Corporations like United Homes, and many fly by night developer corporations with very convenient in house mortgage companies attached to them are being investigated for fraud and deceptive lending practices."
AND houses in the "Brownstone Belt" or to the Asshats "Brownstone Brooklyn"!!!!
Morgan Stanley Cuts Institutional Securities, Asset Management
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=awR_oi0e_HPY&refer=home
"The slides today also said the firm's institutional securities business, which includes investment banking and trading, plans to ``re-size cost base and headcount to match current opportunities.''
See ya later and the exit is that way----->
The What (But.. but Real Estate only goes up...)
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at November 12, 2008 11:29 AM
No it isnt a buyers market - because most sellers havent come to appreciate what is going to happen yet.....and are therefore unwilling to sell at the 'true market' - which is down 20% at least from the high.
A real buyers market comes when sellers shift from resisting selling at a declined market price - because they believe a higher price will come sooner rather then latter to a situation where sellers are willing to take ANY market price because they believe that the future market price will likely be even lower.
Sellers in Brooklyn are still operating under the 1st premise....they are in for an awakening unless they are prepared to wait 10yrs minimum for prices to come back to anything like the recent past (just like what happened in '93-'03)
Posted by: fsrg at November 12, 2008 11:30 AM
Montrose - I think your idea of requiring some preparation on the part of first time home-buyers is a great idea. I sure could have used this the first time I bought, and was lucky to have close family members, and my husband, who had much more experience buying real estate - but it can be complex. Sorting through the decisions of what kind of mortgage to get, the benefits of points vs. no points, understanding/budgeting closing costs, etc are all significant financial decisions that can be overwhelming for the 1st time buyer, especially when purchasing real estate can already be so emotionally daunting. That said, I think Brooklyn brownstones are not immune from foreclosure. I've seen some homes recently in prime areas being sold by owners who suddenly find themselves unable to pay their mortgage due to job loss, change in financial circumstances etc. The people who will suffer most in this downturn are those who stretched in the last 5 years and paid astronomical prices they can no longer afford and must sell at a loss - unlike the long-term owners (or even owners who bought longer than 5 years ago) who should do fine.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 11:31 AM
I agree with MM, there should also be personal finance classes at school period, its a big gap in the cirriculum.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 12, 2008 11:32 AM
dear Z, MM is Montrose. Please don't confuse me with your abbreviations. lets call Miss Muffet MsM.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 12, 2008 11:34 AM
THAL - what's with the name calling? You have to remember that for many first time buyers, the last 5 years or so have been painful. All these people with respectable jobs, and hard-won savings for a downpayment, being looked at by realtors as if they were paupers because the budgets they had (which in any other part of the country would be considered astronomical) were deemed chump change in NYC. I can tell you from personal experience that it's very frustrating to feel like you've worked hard, you've scrimped and saved for the biggest investment of your life, one of the most important one you can make for your family - and you're not given the time of day by realtors because your budget just does not cut it. For some of these buyers to now feel signs of excitement and hope that prices will become affordable does not make them losers. I know the pain of the economy will hurt many people, and those who will suffer deserve genuine sympathy, but what's often forgotten in this equation is that the pain of the bubble - creating a crisis of affordable housing - hurt a lot of people too.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 11:38 AM
yeah, personal finance classes at school would be great. but considering they can't even figure out how to teach basic reading and math in new york city, my faith isn't high that such classes would have any effect, particularly for 18-year olds who are too immature to see their relevance. i agree with MM that this type of education ought to be coupled with the real decisionmaking - whether that's buying a house, signing your first lease, getting your first credit card, etc. the smart thing to do is to require passing some kind of test as a major component of one's credit score.
Posted by: i disagree at November 12, 2008 11:40 AM
i was referring to montrose -- MsM's comment wasn't there when i typed mine. sorry for the confusion!
Posted by: z at November 12, 2008 11:41 AM
"I agree with MM, there should also be personal finance classes at school period, its a big gap in the cirriculum."
WRONG!!! It's called greed and delusion! This has nothing to do with finance. The period 2002-2007 was know as "The Mutant Asset Bubble"! Idiots came out of the woodwork thinking they would strike ti rich. Easy lending and Hype fueled this anomaly! And now the implosion is well underway now we need to learn how to count??!! Please spare me!!
BTW It will not get better from here in fact it will be very bad. I think people should get their heads around this thing and deal with it.
RIP Mutant Asset Bubble
The What (I told ya)
Someday this war is gonna end.....
Posted by: Return of The What at November 12, 2008 11:43 AM
miss muffett, you need to make up your mind about what happened over the past five years. did people with modest incomes stretch to buy expensive properties they couldn't afford? or were people with modest incomes snubbed by brokers and turned away from buying homes?
the phenomenon you're describing (working hard but not being able to afford prime real estate) is less a function of the bubble years and more a simple consequence of living in new york city, where real estate always has been and always will be expensive relative to other markets. yes, many people have been priced out of buying properties in prime brownstone brooklyn. but there are plenty of affordable homes available in other parts of brooklyn, in queens, in the bronx, etc. there's no entitlement to a prime brooklyn home - not for me, not for you, not for anyone.
Posted by: z at November 12, 2008 11:51 AM
What - wrong. People need to be taught how to manage their finances, becuase apparently its not inherent.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 12, 2008 11:55 AM
"Idiots came out of the woodwork thinking they would strike ti rich."
Some people buy houses (or, apartments) so they have a place to live. Some people like to own their place, as opposed to rent from a landlord. Not everyone buys property to get rich. You sound like someone who likes to rent. I've done both, and can see the benefits (and disadvantages) of both.
Posted by: broadwayron at November 12, 2008 12:02 PM
"While many potential sellers may panic at this prospect, I'm not quite sure why unless they unwisely used their home as an ATM, or bought with an intention to flip fast. The vast majority of owners who have owned for more than 3-5 years should do fine."
I will be prudent (thus maintain my prediction of a borough-wide 25 to 50 percent price decline) and assume that the majority of sellers have a HELOC around their neck that has contributed (or will contribute) to their "depth below the water surface". If not technically, then effectively, as they have probably allocated paper wealth to, or borrowed money from, elsewhere. Hence the panic.
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 12:09 PM
Please don't nobody listen to me. Im off the meds and don't know what I'm saying.
I seen the Asshat and it is me. Lookie here and sing wit me;
I'm a little Asshat
Short and stouts
Here is my handle
Here is my spout
When I get all steamed up
I just shout
Tip me over and pour me out
RIP What
The What
Someday this war is gonna end.....
Posted by: Return_of_The_What at November 12, 2008 12:10 PM
Z - I think both things happened. That is, some people with modest incomes stretched to buy properties they couldn't afford (and also, some people with handsome incomes stretched, took on huge mortgages and are now losing their jobs). Others did not buy. Yes, there are tons of other neighborhoods, and while obviously, everyone is not entitled to a 4-story brownstone with detail in Park Slope (for example), I don't think it's wrong for a first time buyer to aspire to live in PS period or other "prime" neighborhoods (and arguably, even the fringes of the prime hoods, which are hardly prime i.e. 14th st bet 4/5 Ave, shot up unbelievably of late as per recent HOTD that sold for close to 2 million). We all make our individual choices/trade-offs re: budget/space/neighborhood (and all that entails in terms of commute/schools/amenities/community etc.). But I do think the bubble years altered things beyond the norm of NYC being expensive overall. I speak as someone, mind you, who benefited from the bubble years, and was able to buy in prime Brooklyn before things got totally insane, but it saddened me to see, for example, so many families at my son's school priced out - these are people who've rented for many years and become very invested in the community, had worked hard and saved, and saw property values shoot up so fast they were priced out. Yes, they could move and buy elsewhere, far away, but that would mean deracinating themselves from a community/school/friends who they'd become very close to in all the years they'd rented. I hope some of these folks can now have a shot at home ownership - perhaps not in the exact location they want to be in, but not so far away that they have to totally uproot their lives.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 12:10 PM
I don't mean to miscategorize myself ... the amount that my fiancee and I can afford to borrow based on our combined salaries is plenty enough that we should be able to afford to own something. And when I say "can afford" I mean "can afford" -- we know exactly how much we are able to pay per month. During the bubble years we'd have been easily approved for well over a million; we're just not interested in stretching like that.
I'm not entitled to a home in prime brownstone Brooklyn ... but that's where I want to live. So yes, I'm hoping prices come down there. I'm not expecting to buy a brownstone in north slope for $400k or anything crazy like that. But $600k for a fixer-upper in a non-historic district that's not an hour away from the city? Yeh, I could handle that. I don't know if that's realistic, but a guy can hope.
Posted by: cwbuecheler at November 12, 2008 12:14 PM
cw...you should be able to find that in prime Bed Stuy. I know of someone selling on Decatur that has not listed yet...let me look into it.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 12:21 PM
Montrose, I am afraid the houses being foreclosed on in Brooklyn are ANY houses in Bushwick (and some in Bed Stuy). The vast majority are two families built in 1900. I've seen about 40 of them for sale. Most were already wrecked beyond repair ten or more years ago (interior walls destroyed and replaced by a warren of poorly installed sheetrock and Home Depot cheap-o doors). It's truly depressing. Only a few are Fedders buildings (since there aren't that many to start with). Just drive through the Bushwick Ave. corridor or anyplace South of Myrtle. You'll see a lot of for-sale signs and boarded-up houses.
You are absolutely right about how this disaster came to be: Deceptive fly-by-night companies targeted minority first-time homebuyers. You are the first person I've heard put it like that. Where can I read/see more about this? It seems to me the media is not covering this adequately -- or maybe I am reading the wrong media. Many of these buyers were middle-aged immigrants who did not speak English. Naturally, they wouldn't know what they were getting into. Also, in New York, where a lawyer is mandatory, the lawyers must have been in the pocket of the mortgage companies. This is like the flipside of redlining, and I can only imagine it's going to have a devastating effect on these neighborhoods -- not to mention it's already bringing down our entire economy and credit-fueled consumer way of life.
I just pray these people did not lose down payments.
Also, one other note: Every person I run into with a professional job keeps repeating over and over again: Why was I not offered these terms? Guess their credit wasn't bad enough.
Posted by: mopar at November 12, 2008 12:22 PM
MISS MUFFET
Here is my problem with his statement he is hoping that real estate goes down 50% so he can buy in an area. Everyone knows that real estate needy to correct alittle but some people want people wiped out so they can get a deal of a life time. I just bought a place a few months back and got a discount of about 15% of the appraisal and was pretty excited. Who knows where real estate will go from here probably down a bit but I hate reading people hoping everything forecloses becasue his 25k salary cant afford an apartment. Thats my point.
Here is my question prime brooklyn(B-Heights and Boerum/Cobble Hill) I dont see prices getting smoked that bad. Especially for 1 bd becasue there is a demand for them. Are you telling me that apartments can come down another 50% (YOU ARE DREAMING) ITs a pipe dream.
Posted by: THAL at November 12, 2008 12:23 PM
I agree with everything fsrg at November 12, 2008 11:30 AM said except for...
"...unless they are prepared to wait 10yrs minimum for prices to come back to anything like the recent past (just like what happened in '93-'03)"
Again, this is a once in a lifetime boom/bust (legendary housing bubble). You will never see 2008 prices again in 2008 dollars during your lifetime. The "in it for the long haul" argument is dead. If you did not sell before Black October, you will catch an "L". There are exceptions but this is the rule (yes, Brownstone Brooklyn TM too).
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 12:33 PM
THAL - since prices have appreciated far in excess of 100% over the last 5+yrs, please explain to me why it would be impossible for prices to decline 50%?
Posted by: fsrg at November 12, 2008 12:33 PM
THAL - if you love your place, can afford it, and plan to stay for a pretty long time, you'll be fine. I'm glad you got a deal. As to what will happen in prime Brooklyn, no one knows. Did anyone expect the stock market to tank as far as it has? No one has a crystal ball. What we do know is that prices have more than doubled in the last 5 years in some of the prime areas and the writing has been on the wall for some time that this was unsustainable. Again, I don't think it's wrong for a 1st time buyer to look forward to price declines - doing so does not make them a monster that wants "people wiped out". Hopefully, most buyers, like you, will experience paper losses only. But let's face it - in every market, there are winners and losers and for years, owners have been the winners. For years, owners have been very excited about this. Now, it's the buyers who are getting excited. Human nature.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 12:33 PM
When the heck did I say I was hoping real estate goes down 50%? I said "drop, baby, drop" and not "drop by 50%, baby, drop by 50%"
Posted by: cwbuecheler at November 12, 2008 12:41 PM
fsrg makes a great point - why would a 50% be so improbable given the rise by over 100% in 5 years?
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 12:43 PM
Dow - 10yrs I agree might be a bit short - which is why I said "minimum"; but the mass psycology that creates these bubble/bursts, do seem to reset relatively quickly. It seems like when the 'leading generation' moves into retirement, the younger generations are able to then convince themselves that "this time is different" -
Granted this bubble was larger and bigger then many in the past but other huge speculative bubbles have returned in one lifetime (examples include - Florida RE, Stocks (a few times), Gold, and Oil to name a few).
Posted by: fsrg at November 12, 2008 12:44 PM
"WRONG!!! It's called greed and delusion! This has nothing to do with finance."
The What is absolutely correct. The spiking bar for required credit scores cancels out the need for personal finance education. You are officially educated when you reach 700 and some change. Finance meant nothing when banks became brokers with Wall St and "hot-potatoe'd" mortgage debt to unsuspecting investors. Guess who's back: Traditional Lending Standards. Tighty tighty.
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 12:50 PM
DIBS - I need to learn more about Bed Stuy for sure. The neighborhood is obviously going to have a lot of available properties in the coming months. I just know literally nothing about the area except that some parts of it are not-so-nice. I looked at an apartment to the east of Pratt, around Bedford Ave, a couple years ago, and the building was legitimately falling apart and smelled like rotting meat. The whole area around it seemed about the same, but Bed Stuy's a big place and I'm sure it's got some nicer sections.
Posted by: cwbuecheler at November 12, 2008 12:55 PM
Yes, cw...some areas nice, some marginal, some hell. Bed Stuy is very large. Don't even bother checking out those two foreclosures of the day.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 1:00 PM
Looks good from here "what".
5 real estate markets most likely to rebound
Seattle tops the list of best places to invest in commercial property
The financial meltdown creates a domino effect in New York. Office vacancies rise, investment workers don't get bonuses and skimp on Christmas gifts, hurting retail. But New York is a one-of-a-kind market that is expected to stay strong. Falling rents could even make the city more livable.
View related photos
iStock
More from Forbes.com
• Top-Earning Dead Celebrities
• Is Your Office Making You Sick?
• Superpowers Of The Super-Athletes
• The Gatekeepers That Stand Between You and Success
• Fastest-Growing White-Collar Paychecks
Most popular
• Most viewed • Top rated • Most e-mailed
Paulson: Troubled assets will not be purchased
McCain says Palin didn't hurt presidential bid
2,900-year-old Phoenician remains found
Police: Iraqi soldier kills two U.S. troops
Makeover! ‘What happened to grandma?’
Most viewed on msnbc.com
Oldest WWI survivor remembers forgotten ones
Pilot lands safely after going blind in mid-air
Souped-up immune cells catch disguised HIV
Astronauts head for extreme space makeover
A running friendship saves the life of one pal
Most viewed on msnbc.com
Paulson: Troubled assets will not be purchased
2,900-year-old Phoenician remains found
Soap up! The 12 germiest places in your life
Big purse saves college student from bullet
Oil slips below $57 on global growth pessimism
Most viewed on msnbc.com
Latest interest rates
Mortgage Home Equity Savings Auto Credit Cards
See today's average mortgage rates across the country.Loan type Today +/- Last week
30-year fixed 6.06% 6.22%
15-year fixed 5.76% 5.93%
30-year fixed jumbo 7.50% 7.57%
5/1 ARM 5.93% 6.02%
7/1 ARM 6.16% 6.24%
Source: Bankrate.com | View rates in your area
See today's average home equity rates across the country.Loan type Today +/- Last week
$30K HELOC 4.88% 5.01%
$30K home equity loan 8.12% 8.09%
$75K home equity loan 7.99% 7.93%
$50K home equity loan 8.00% 7.94%
$50K HELOC 4.70% 4.75%
Source: Bankrate.com | View rates in your area
See today's savings rates across the country.Savings type Today +/- Last week
Money market 2.42% 2.44%
$10K money market 2.67% 2.79%
Six-month CD 3.00% 3.03%
One-year CD 3.48% 3.55%
Five-year CD 3.86% 3.89%
Source: Bankrate.com | View rates in your area
See today's average auto rates across the country.Loan type Today +/- Last week
48-month new car loan 6.58% 6.60%
36-month used car loan 7.15% 7.20%
36-month new car loan 6.82% 6.84%
60-month new car loan 6.59% 6.62%
72-month new car loan 6.44% 6.44%
Source: Bankrate.com | View rates in your area
See today's average credit card rates across the country.Card type Fixed Variable
Standard 13.42% 11.61%
Gold 11.73% 10.29%
Platinum 10.77% 11.48%
All 12.00% 11.30%
Source: Bankrate.com | View more rates
By Dorothy Pomerantz
updated 7:09 a.m. ET, Tues., Nov. 11, 2008
If you're a homeowner seeing property values plummet, look to the commercial real estate market for solace. It might tell you which areas will recover fastest — and which will likely remain weak.
The Urban Land Institute recently asked 700 real estate professionals to name the best (and worst) places to invest in commercial real estate in the coming year. Those surveyed included private developers, Realtors and Real Estate Investment Trust executives. Their answers also apply to the residential market, since the single-family-home sector typically follows the economy. As wages go up and there are more jobs, more people can buy homes, pushing prices up.
The best cities in which to invest are those that are considered gateways to international investment, have vital downtowns where people can forgo cars, and don't have a glut of condos or office space.
Story continues below ↓
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
advertisement | your ad here
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These traits landed Seattle the No. 1 spot on the list. No city scored above a 6.15 on a scale of one to nine (one being an abysmal place to invest and nine being excellent).
More on this story
Slide show: Best and worst places for real estate investors
Seattle is "a diversified market, has a good base of business and is becoming a 24-hour city," says Stephen Blank, senior resident fellow, finance, of the Urban Land Institute. "It's going to be in a good position to come back."
Although the city is suffering from the loss of Washington Mutual and the downsizing of Starbucks, Boeing and Microsoft are still relatively strong. Apartment vacancies are low and there aren't too many new buildings going up, meaning the market won't be oversupplied. The same is true in the retail space.
San Francisco comes in second with a 6.12. The City by the Bay learned from the tech crash of 2001 not to overbuild. There is a reasonable supply of office and apartment space, which should limit vacancies. San Francisco's port is also expected to help the city during the downturn as Americans continue to rely on Asian imports.
Washington, D.C., New York and Los Angeles round out the top five.
Of course, there's no guarantee that an improved commercial market will lead to an improved home market. However, investors have a better chance of seeing home prices rise in fundamentally strong markets like Seattle than in struggling cities like Detroit.
More from Forbes.com
Click links below for slide shows
America’s next foreclosure capitals
How to squeeze more money from your home
Best and worst places for real estate investors
Video: Million-dollar foreclosures
Cities where your nest egg goes farthest
It landed at the bottom of the list, scoring a 2.24. Detroit has been reliant on the car industry, which is rapidly shrinking. Other businesses are unlikely to fill the void in the next few years, which means the city will be hit hard by further economic struggles.
New Orleans also lands near the bottom with a score of 3.33. The city has been losing businesses to Houston, Dallas and Atlanta since Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005.
The other cities at the bottom of the list — Columbus, Ohio, Milwaukee, Wis., and Cleveland — suffer from dying industries and lack of tourist appeal.
Recent attempts to turn downtown Milwaukee into a thriving 24-hour city haven't been enough to
Posted by: sebb at November 12, 2008 1:02 PM
Not Florida RE, fsrg. When I say one's lifetime I'm counting from when they are old enough to own. You had to be 30 or 40 (average) to have owned in 1930. By 2003, you were "well out of daisys to push up". We'll never see these prices in real terms before we die. We'll see bubble prices but not like the recent past.
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 1:03 PM
I guess sebb was the faded type spammer all along
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 1:11 PM
fsrq and DOW8000SP800 - neither of you have any facts, and unless NY population goes down significantly, then you will be proven wrong. i don't believe that Brooklyn real estate went up for over 100% from what it should have been selling at - i believe that in the late '90's and early '00's broorklyn real estate was selling for too little. the housing was underpriced.
if the population continues to grow at the pace that the statisticians are expecting, we continue to see a high demand for property here.
agree that prices will drop now, but will never come back in 10 years?? doubt it.
Posted by: wine lover at November 12, 2008 1:16 PM
"i don't believe that Brooklyn real estate went up for over 100% from what it should have been selling at - i believe that in the late '90's and early '00's broorklyn real estate was selling for too little. the housing was underpriced."
And the winner of the Tortured Argument Lacking any Facts Whatsoever award goes to...
Posted by: SnarkSlope at November 12, 2008 1:23 PM
Freakonomics had something to do with the low prices in the 80s and early 90s and the subsequent rapid rise thereafter. Guiliani cleaned it up and made it happen. Prices were way too low back then. NYC was a disaster and now its a world class city and that isn't going to change.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 1:25 PM
"NYC was a disaster and now its a world class city and that isn't going to change."
Never heard of a black swan, eh?
Bloomberg just cut 1,000 cops, by the way.
Posted by: Polemicist at November 12, 2008 1:30 PM
Economics is very complex. Some (Soros) argue that we have lived through a long-standing mega-bubble in many asset classes. What is happening now, the unwinding of that bubble, is unprecedented. We can all argue til we're blue in the face but no one knows the definitive answer. The only thing we all agree on is that prices WILL go down, even in prime areas. 50% does not seem out of the question, and 25% seems modest. But really, how far prices will decline, and for how long, is anyone's guess. Barring some future catastrophe, I too think that, eventually, NYC prices will go back up, but there are so many other things that might change that too - alternative energy, for example and better public transport that will make suburban commutes more attractive. Anyway, there's no question we're heading for a prolonged buyers market where prices will drop a lot and for a while and we'll just have to wait to see what else the future brings.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 1:32 PM
Yeah Polemicist..."black swan" is the phrase du jour. Quite overused these days if you ask me. I guess you read the WSJ. If I hear that, "perfect storm" and "fat tail" anymore I'm going to barf.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 1:43 PM
"sebb vs what...
This is gonna be on fire."
No way I messing with sebb. He's on that extra strength stuff. The Reality Distortion Field that surround him is very strong!
"if the population continues to grow at the pace that the statisticians are expecting, we continue to see a high demand for property here."
BBZZZZZ! Wrong. People are getting laid off in droves! Most of the newly transplanted Asshats are going back to flyover land. Maybe they can start doing something productive again like helping with the harvest.
"Guiliani cleaned it up and made it happen. Prices were way too low back then. NYC was a disaster and now its a world class city and that isn't going to change."
Check that Dave and sebb.
You have to be in complete denial now. The Mutant Asset Bubble is imploding right in front of you...
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at November 12, 2008 1:43 PM
Why are you posting here as ROTW and over in the Forum as What
Loser
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 1:45 PM
Dow - you ignore the Florida RE boom of the late 70's early 80's.
wine lover - you ignore that the "demand" is based on perceptions - including perceptions of which way the housing market is going. i.e. people aint coming to buy if they think prices are falling.
Houses are not financial instruments, they have no inherent value besides the shelter they provide, they pay no dividend, and have no retained earnings. Once you get past a roof, running water, a kitchen and heat - the "value" of all the rest is purely what people value these extras (location, layout, finishes, etc...) at. Peoples desire (demand) is then mitigated by income and cost of capital.
In many places houses actually cost less than their replacement cost.
Ultimately wine lover the point is...."facts" play only a small roll in pricing.
One psychological "fact" that does play into all this however is that the psycology has historically worked the same in both directions - that is on the way up people convince themselves that "this time is different" and prices rise to unimaginable levels AND on the downside people convince themselves again that "this time is different" and prices fall to extremely low levels. And while both "levels" are correct for their time - so far (at least in the last 500yrs or so) this time is never that "different", so the trick is to avoid being burned by the swings in mass psycology so you can have a nice place to live - which is the point after all.
Posted by: fsrg at November 12, 2008 1:48 PM
BTW - to illustrate my point about the psychology within pricing even better - go back only a few months because I vividly recall arguing with some genius here that was saying oil would never again fall below $100 a barrel, that this time "was different"...guess what - oil is NOW at $57 a barrel and the "analysts" are fighting on who can lower their price targets quicker.
Posted by: fsrg at November 12, 2008 1:55 PM
Just about a year ago,
I set out on Brownstoner,
Seeking my fame and fortune,
Looking for a pot of gold.
Things got bad, and things got worse,
I guess you will know the tune.
Oh ! Lord, Stuck in Lodi again.
I'm losing it completely. Somebodty pass me my meds...
I not kidding.
The What
Someday this song is gonna end...
Posted by: Return_of_The_What at November 12, 2008 1:56 PM
fsrq...on this one you're spot on..."In many places houses actually cost less than their replacement cost." My Chubb policy will attest to that!!!!
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 1:59 PM
"fsrq and DOW8000SP800 - neither of you have any facts"
Facts:
http://tinyurl.com/g9vf4 (Price History Graph)
http://njrereport.com/80sbubble.htm (80's Bubble)
Population is flat at approximately 8 mil
Negative savings rate not seen since Great Depression
Unemployment about 10 percent and rising
Big five I-banks no more
Bailouts approaching $5T
Unprecedented intervention
etc...etc...etc...
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 2:05 PM
"Dow - you ignore the Florida RE boom of the late 70's early 80's."
Doesn't compare to what's in store for FL now (what was drop from the peak, -50% or less?). Have to turn to the 1930's boom/bust (more than -50% drop).
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 2:09 PM
DOW8000SP800
You cant compare areas of FLA to NYC. People work here there will always be a demand to live here. Get a clue. Prices will probably come down more obviously but armageddon is not coming.
Posted by: THAL at November 12, 2008 2:16 PM
BBZZZZZ! Wrong. People are getting laid off in droves! Most of the newly transplanted Asshats are going back to flyover land. Maybe they can start doing something productive again like helping with the harvest.
People are not going anywhere "what" . Yes some people will leave of course. But most people will stay . If you think the financial world looks Bad in NYC how do you think the job outlook is in South Carolina?
We must realize prices will dip slightly but overall we will always be a first rate City and that will keep us strong.
Posted by: sebb at November 12, 2008 2:20 PM
sebb your last paragraph is spot on. South Carolina will probably be fine since the only business down there is tobacco. :)
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 2:34 PM
"A real buyers market comes when sellers shift from resisting selling at a declined market price - because they believe a higher price will come sooner rather then latter to a situation where sellers are willing to take ANY market price because they believe that the future market price will likely be even lower."
QOTD from fsrq. Very astute. I agree that we are not in a buyer's market yet.
In the next six to twelve months, inventory is going to slowly increase in prime Brooklyn until there is a glut of unsold inventory, including some real high-end stuff. Then we will be in a buyer's market. Until then I hold on to my cash and wait.
Posted by: lechacal at November 12, 2008 2:42 PM
Agree with lechacal. Sebb, as usual, is grasping at straws since he can't bear the reality of what is happening. Prices will go down more than "modestly" - just wait.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 2:46 PM
Speaking of mass psychology, I'm thinking with absolutely everyone predicting further RE declines, it must be time to buy :-)
Homeowner classes? Ahh, I hate that kind of forced sh*t. But I see where MM is coming from.
You could finish the class in about 5 mins, of course.
1. Get your credit rating to 750;
2. Put 20% down and have a year mortgage payments in the bank;
3. Only take out a fixed 15 yr or 30yr mortgage. All the other sh*t should be illegal.
If you can't do 1-3, stay renting!
Posted by: denton at November 12, 2008 3:03 PM
Miss Muffett, some of what you say is true... but I do believe you have been born without the empathy gene. It's no so much the constant self-serving predictions, as it is the insistence that others will be "fine", when in similar circumstances you would not be.
Of course we would need to run through this scenario again... with you on the other side of the equation to know for sure...
Posted by: Aussie at November 12, 2008 3:06 PM
"You cant compare areas of FLA to NYC."
I didn't. If I did, please reread and quote me. I merely entertained fsrq's Florida example when he/she tried to negate my point that we'll never see a RE boom/bust like this before we die. FL in the 70's/80's paled in comparison to FL in the 1930's. What FL is experiencing now is more comparable to the 1930's. Of course New York is more expensive but that difference from FL was already priced in before the bubble got started.
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 3:06 PM
"QOTD from fsrq."
I second. It's not too late, Brownstoner!
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 3:11 PM
I agree with you denton but that 3 point test wouldn't have/wont save them from going underwater this time.
Posted by: Aussie at November 12, 2008 3:11 PM
Dow, you and the What are wrong regarding those who may be going into forclosure from ignorance. Education and awareness would have saved quite a few from losing everything. Not everyone is greedy, too many are just ignorant.
If you, as a first time home buyer, are told by a bunch of really nice suits, who look like you, and treat you with respect, that you can afford this, and lay out figures, including tenant's rent, that will enable you to do this, you might go for it. Since most people's basic education hardly includes any financial information, they are clueless. As former renters, they understand X payment per month, not much more. Since the nice company is providing the name of a lawyer who would be glad to help out, if they even suggest it, what's not to trust? They even tell you to take your time, and read through the documents. Please.
Mortgage docs are boring, full of small print and legalese, and are a mystery to anyone not in the business. That's why we get independent lawyers. It doesn't surprise me in the least that down the road, people find out they signed up for an adjustable rate that triples in 2 years, and no one told them about closing costs, points, taxes, NYC building codes and fees, etc, etc.
I have an Ivy league education, and I had a lawyer, and I was still floored by all of the fees, registrations, inspections, and costs of running a 3 family "business". Nobody told me about boiler inspections, or the fact that ConEd charges a different, higher business rate for my common electric use. Does anyone ever tell a first timer about water bills, or paying to register your building? Thank God I was aware of all of the basic financial stuff regarding my actual mortgage.
It's no wonder people foreclose. Can you imagine if you barely speak English? There should be a law. Greed is the least of the problems, here.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at November 12, 2008 3:34 PM
MM...I learned that the buyer of my UES condo was told by his broker that it would rent out for $3,500 or more. The doorman overheard this conversation. At the closing I realized that English was not his first language and the real estate agent was very pushy (I'm being kind). I didn't know anything about whether he was at all financially astute but he was sold a "bill of goods" by his agent. I believe it was a cash sale if I remember correctly. That apartment would rent for $2,300 tops.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 12, 2008 3:50 PM
Thank you Miss Muffett @ 1138am!
Posted by: vmw at November 12, 2008 4:36 PM
I'm confused, MM. What exactly do we disagree about? The What said "greed and delusion". You seem to agree that both were at stake. Delusion would be what you refer to as ignorance.
Fool me twice, shame on me. 99% of all screwed buyers have been jerked before by not understanding what they signed.
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at November 12, 2008 4:43 PM
Aussie - not sure why you think I lack empathy, unless it's because I don't seem to have a lot of sympathy for owners who bought properties for a song and now may complain that they are only reaping 1 million in profit, instead of 1.5 (or 500K, instead of 1million, etc.? As I've said repeatedly, I *DO* empathize with those people who stretched in the last few years and now can't afford their mortgages, and will possibly have to sell at a loss in the future. I sincerely hope this does not happen to a lot of people. But I also think there are many owners for whom a downturn will mean a smaller profit, not being "underwater" by any stretch, given the unbelievable price appreciation of the last decade, and especially the last 5 years. One thing I find very puzzling on an anonymous blog is how other anonymous people make personality judgments when so little is known about any of the people who post on here. None of us can possibly really know very much about others - and I'm sure we all have our share of good luck and bad, empathy and selfish motives etc. Please, let's keep the personal attacks at bay and stick to real estate.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 9:02 PM
"Dow, you and the What are wrong regarding those who may be going into forclosure from ignorance. Education and awareness would have saved quite a few from losing everything. Not everyone is greedy, too many are just ignorant."
No MM I am a Real Estate Broker and I will tell you 80% of the buyers who came into my office was delusional and greedy. 2002-2007 was the Mutant Asset bubble and the mortgage production out there was nuts! 106% financing Stated income, Stated Assets, one day out of Bankruptcy (NO BS), 1% teaser rates, Just sign you life away! You will never see that crap again in your or my life! Paulson if demanding the Banks loan out the money they got in the 700 billion dollar tax slave rip-off and the banks are telling Paulson to "Get Bent"!
Here Morris put that "Ivy League" education to work!
Paulson Lacks Leverage to Make Banks Put Cash to Work (Update1)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=amZ3uCIUB8GQ&refer=home
Treasury officials acknowledge they can't force banks to get the taxpayer money into the hands of their customers. Instead, officials are betting that the government's investment will create conditions where banks have a greater incentive to earn profits from lending than to hoard money to shore up their balance sheets.
Ivy League Huh?? Those are the Asshats who has Jacked (I can't curse) everything in America and most likely we are in a Depression!!!!
"It's no wonder people foreclose. Can you imagine if you barely speak English? There should be a law. Greed is the least of the problems, here."
No Morris Greed, Delusion and Stupidity...
The What
Someday Morris put her nose down....
Posted by: Return of The What at November 12, 2008 9:14 PM
Aussie - a quick P.S. - today's HOTD on Lincoln Place is on the market for over 2.5 (almost 2.6)., and last traded, just 4 years ago for about half of that, 1.3+mil. So, would I feel sorry for the seller if, say, this house sold for 1.8-2mil? Probably not. Sure, they may have spent money on renovation, but I highly doubt they spent more than 500-600K. If they walk away with "only" 100-200K in profits, or, if the worst case scenario for them is that they break even, is that really so bad?
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 12, 2008 10:32 PM
What......Wha??????
You must have been selling to mostly flippers and scoundrels, not normal people. Sheesh.
As to the rest of your post, I feel like I didn't get the decoder ring that allows me to understand your logic. I give up.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at November 12, 2008 11:35 PM
"As to the rest of your post, I feel like I didn't get the decoder ring that allows me to understand your logic. I give up."
Let me help you. Remove your head out of your rectum. Ah better now...
Greed+ Delusion=Fail
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at November 12, 2008 11:47 PM
is it a buyer's market? sort of, i guess. According to my mortgage broker, because of the declining value of real estate in my neighborhood (Fort Greene), they want a 50% down payment. I'm just an MD trying to enjoy my life, and I still can't afford to own my own home in this city.
Posted by: oliver at November 13, 2008 1:48 AM
What, you missed your calling in proctology. You seem absolutely fascinated by matters pertaining to that field. Your bedside manner leaves much to be desired, however. You might want to work on that first.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at November 13, 2008 10:59 AM
Snaps!
Posted by: mopar at November 13, 2008 12:25 PM
Oliver, how can this be? Currently 20 percent is fine in Bushwick and Bed Stuy. Or could that be because prices in Bushwick and Bed Stuy have already declined 40 percent since 2005? Have you checked with a mortgage broker or another agent? Curious to hear more about this situation.
Posted by: mopar at November 13, 2008 12:27 PM
Oh wait, of course, Oliver, you're buying property that is way over the jumbo limit. Interesting. Does that mean all buyers of plus-$500,000 townhouses in Brooklyn (even with credit scores over 750) will need to put 50 percent down? That will put a crimp in the number of people buying such houses, for sure, but I still don't see a big run-down. Most people will just sit tight.
Posted by: mopar at November 13, 2008 12:32 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.