« Co-op of the Day: 1 Pierrepont Street House of the Day: 318 1st Street »
November 18, 2008
Cheap Today, Cheaper Tomorrow?
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/7260
Comments
Well this just confirms what I (and other market bears) have been saying. Nice to hear it confirmed by a real estate pro. The question I have is whether sellers will want to take a rip-the-bandaid aproach and just cut their prices a lot now (unleashing pent up demand) or hold out with prices that, even with a slight discount off of peak, are ridiculous in this climate, will lead to lingering, and eventual steep price-cutting.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 18, 2008 1:13 PM
ROTW uses the same language as the unscrupulous "block-buster" real-estate agents who operated so effectively in NYC during the "white flight" days of the 60's. They peddled fear, and bought homes on the cheap from those who fled. He fails to understand that this is a different era. He may be trying to do the same thing, as there are runmours that he is a real estate agent. Pay no attention to him.
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at November 18, 2008 1:17 PM
miss muffett, don't you ever get bored repeating the same points, using almost the same exact words, every day, every week, post after post? i don't mean that as an insult. i just don't understand how you keep it up.
Posted by: z at November 18, 2008 1:40 PM
It appears that many people really don't need to sell. I think prices aren't going to zero, but supply will start dropping a lot (except for all that new-building-crap that isn't selling). Many people seem stuck at their prices, and are probably not going to keep their place on the market for a year, so they'll just pull the ad. Of course, there will always be the smaller amount of folks who NEED to sell, and that's where the bargains will be (as always).
Posted by: broadwayron at November 18, 2008 1:42 PM
z - Nope. Not as long as sellers keep insisting their sky-high prices are rational. I will happily repeat what I think is inevitable since I am stunned by the continuing denial among some sellers. Did owners ever get tired of saying over and over that values only go up during the boom years? Not from what I read on this blog.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 18, 2008 1:46 PM
WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE JUST GET WITH THE PROGRAM AND HAND OVER YOUR D*&^%D HOUSE TO MISS MUFFETT ALREADY!!!! (outside PS 321 zone need not apply.)
Posted by: i disagree at November 18, 2008 1:50 PM
I disagree - well, thank you. But actually, there are a bunch of other schools we like! And contrary to your post, we are not expecting a hand over, just a rational price.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 18, 2008 1:57 PM
it's not for your benefit - it's so the rest of us don't have to hear it anymore.
p.s. - unless you have a crystal ball, what you think is rational isn't necessarily so.
Posted by: i disagree at November 18, 2008 2:04 PM
I disagree - I, and many others, suffered through plenty of owners'/sellers' repetitive gloating since this blog began, and endured ever climbing definitions of what was a "rational" price. Shoe's on the other foot.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 18, 2008 2:09 PM
Hate to contribute to a "pile on ms muffett" situation because I certainly understand where you are coming from on many levels but I think its a bit of a stretch to beg people for "rational" pricing when you yourself benefited from the "irrational" pricing of the bubble. Do you think your buyers wish they could come back to you and demand a more rational price? And "i disagree" is very correct when he/she says that what is rational to you is not likely to be a universally accepted position.
Posted by: wasder at November 18, 2008 2:11 PM
you suffered all the way to the bank, miss muffett. the rest of us should hope to suffer the way you have. seriously. you need to get some better problems.
Posted by: i disagree at November 18, 2008 2:17 PM
Wasder - I've said this before, but will say it again. We priced conservatively when we sold and both parties got a good deal. Am I an altruist who will give things away way below market value? No, but I was realistic to price low-ish when the market was starting to turn - in other words, I *was* aiming to choose a rational price given the changing market conditions. Were I selling today, I would have priced *much* lower since the market has changed so much. And you know what? I still would have done just fine since I am trying to trade up, and the market we are now trying to trade up has gone done too (though at the time I sold, I was trying to secure enough money to trade up in *that* market). I've also said before that the buyers of my place, whom I stay in touch with, remain happy with their purchase since it was still lower priced than anything comparable at the time, and they intend to stay long term. I'm not pretending to be the arbiter of what is rational - the market is telling all of us that, every day that passes. But certain sellers are clearly not listening.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 18, 2008 2:19 PM
We can't expect "rational" from anyone with a vested interest, buyers or sellers. But with the economy going nowhere and layfss and order cancellations aking headliine news every day....
Ask some real estate professor from Dakota or something.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 18, 2008 2:19 PM
miss muffett, i have been reading this site for a long time, and i don't recall any user who gloated about the bull market more than a fraction as often as you gloat about the bear market. (and as a prospective buyer during much of that time, i had just as much reason as you to chafe at gloating-bull comments.)
Posted by: z at November 18, 2008 2:20 PM
Hi Ms Muffet,
I'm curious if you're only looking in Park Slope or if you have looked farther afield (Fort Greene and Prospect Heights)?
It seems you have been following the market closely as a prospective buyer for a good long while. I'm curious how buyers are viewing things in the brownstone areas of Brooklyn right now.
How much would you say a 4-story double duplex should go for in northern Park Slope, prime Prospect Heights, or prime Fort Greene currently?
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at November 18, 2008 2:22 PM
ms muffett: I hear you and I did a similar sort of thing when I sold my co-op a few months back (that is set the asking price somewhat lower than what the realtor recommended so as to sell quickly). And I also have stayed in touch with my buyers and can't thus far detect any frustration with the apartment or the price. Were i to try to sell now I also would be asking for less. But I guess my point is that there is nothing that any of us can do to predict with any accuracy how low the market is going and therefore to expect other people to see things the way you do and cut their prices down on what is likely the most valuable piece of property in their possession is barking up the wrong tree.
Posted by: wasder at November 18, 2008 2:25 PM
Z - I cannot tell you how many times we were told that our house budget just didn't cut it when we were looking pre-crash, and had that confirmed repeatedly on this blog - if I so much as suggested that prices could come down, many people disdained such comments as ridiculous wishful thinking. The difference now is that, up until pretty recently, users on this blog were not required to adopt a handle so there is really no way to know if the users insisting prices could only go up were the same small group of gloaters or not.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 18, 2008 2:28 PM
come on z- everyone on here who vocied an opinion that prices would go down were written off as lunatics or "bitter renters" or invited to "dream on". At least Miss Muffett is civil.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 18, 2008 2:31 PM
Doesn't it seem like prices have only dropped on places you don't want? Or, the places you want haven't seen price drops anywhere near what you expect? It's possible that the desirable places will never be "cheap". Barring divorce, death, relocation, unemployment, etc... the people who own these "better" places may just decide to stay where they are. Of course, there will always be crap for sale, but in NYC, even that's expensive. Still. There may be "buyers" renting for 10+ years looking for a good deal.
Posted by: broadwayron at November 18, 2008 2:35 PM
BrooklynGreene - much as we love Fort Greene and Prospect Heights, we have not looked very seriously at those neighborhoods since good public schools are one of our key criteria - private school is not an option for us. While it's true the schools in those areas are starting to change, we fear it would not be quickly enough for us given ages of our kids. What I did notice (since we've literally been looking for many years, and started before we even had kids) is that prices in those neighborhoods rose even more quickly than Park Slope and thus, I don't know if they are more vulnerable to a steeper decline. On the other hand, they were also probably significantly under-valued for many years.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 18, 2008 2:35 PM
dittoburg - Miss Muffett may be civil but it IS crazy how she repeats herself. I know you're excited MM - I too am obsessing over the economy - but your constant nattering is starting to look a bit like mild OCD.
Posted by: gkw at November 18, 2008 2:46 PM
Hi Ms Muffet,
I can understand some of your school district issues. That aside, since you've been looking, what have things actually been selling for? I only look at the real estate ads which and the impression of prices, of course, cannot be truly accurate. It IS interesting looking at the 6-months-later feature on this website though but these are only a sliver of the transactions going on out there. Aren't things still changing hands? I assume things haven't ground to a complete halt. I don't know enough young people who are in the market to gauge what is going out out there.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at November 18, 2008 3:00 PM
What's wrong with the public schools in Prospect Heights?
I know a couple whose daughter attended public schools in Prospect Heights for her entire K-12 education.
Last year she was accepted to Yale.
How bad can they be?
Posted by: SnarkSlope at November 18, 2008 3:15 PM
They're not that bad. They're actually pretty good. But I don't want people moving in who are as "afraid" of them as she seems to be. Miss Muffet, may I suggest an easy way for you to afford your private school tuition? RENT.
Posted by: Heather at November 18, 2008 3:22 PM
Stoner, shouldn't you ban anyone who refers to herself as an altruist?
Posted by: FatLenny at November 18, 2008 3:23 PM
I am planning on sending my kids to PS11 in Clinton Hill which is improving by leaps and bounds every year. Ms Muffett you might want to look in that district.
Posted by: wasder at November 18, 2008 3:24 PM
Snarky - I don't think the education one gets is the real issue. The education one gets at an NYC public school can clearly get you into an excellent college. The issue is whether the big majority of those in your class, and school, are on the same page as you - ie willing and wanting to learn. The violence and nonsense at certain public schools would lead a parent to immediately conclude not. Take the teachers of any diabolical school, put them in a different building with a bunch of willing kids, and you'll get plenty of good results.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 18, 2008 3:29 PM
dittoburg, with all due respect, what you said doesn't make much sense. you say that the education one gets isn't the real issue, but then say it requires a "big majority" of kids willing to learn in order to get "plenty of good results." what are you evaluating, if learning and education isn't the issue? or are you talking about general socialization, comfort and safety? not that these are insignificant, mind you...just a different set of issues.
Posted by: i disagree at November 18, 2008 4:15 PM
Miss Muffet - schools are a legit concern. However, you should do your research. There are many great schools in every nabe. Like Wasder, I am also looking at PS 11 and know many parents who are very happy there. dittoburg makes a good point about being around children who are willing to learn or what i like to say are families with the same 'values' that i have.
what is your price range? what exactly are you looking for? we sold at the top of the market also, i didn't know it was the top at the time and i actually thought 'man could we have done better if we waited?' but we needed to sell b/c we found a another home. we stayed in the same 'hood but went to a better block/area. we used our profit to upgrade our new home which was cheaper than our 'selling' price.
i am visiting many public schools in and outside of my immediate neighborhood. you should really do some research.
Posted by: bkny at November 18, 2008 4:43 PM
gotta love the evolution of delusion - "Sellers simply won't sell if they can't get top dollar. They'll just hold until the market recovers". Damn, we just solved the housing crisis! LOL
Posted by: cornerbodega at November 18, 2008 4:50 PM
what I was hoping to convey is that the education provided doesn't differ as much as some "professional" commentators would have us believe; it is whether you can, and do, take advantage of the education that is provided. The comfort and saftey issues directly impact that. If you're in with a bunch of bad apples larking around in class, the teacher may be teaching the same but you'll have to work extra-hard to succeed. In other words, when parents are deciding whats a bad school, its not, as one might otherwise think, a matter of looking at teacher ability.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 18, 2008 4:52 PM
sorry, "not simply a matter of looking at teacher ability"
Posted by: dittoburg at November 18, 2008 5:00 PM
I think it's fairly heartbreaking to look at a class of 5-year olds and have the ability to decide that some are "bad apples."
Posted by: Heather at November 18, 2008 5:19 PM
okay. gotcha - of course you have to look at other factors. and it seems to me that snark's example suggests that, indeed, kids can and do take advantage of what's offered to them in some lesser-known schools. my (and other posters too, it seems) point is that there seem to be a lot of mistaken assumptions about the "values" and "larking around" of kids/families in schools that are not the much-praised ps 321.
Posted by: i disagree at November 18, 2008 5:20 PM
I can't comment on the fabled ps321. However, our experience was parents physcially assaulting teachers at parents' evenings (twice, separate people) in a city school which we pulled our daughter from two years back. We were fortunate enough to find another school where the teachers and the parents weren't on opposite sides.
And while I'll agree with you that its easy to make incorrect or convenient assumptions about the values of parents, when it comes to students "larking around" it is pretty clear cut as to what a student should and should not be doing at school.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 18, 2008 5:43 PM
Heather, I don't think these considerations are applicable below 5th grade or so, not least becuase teachers are able to control the class.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 18, 2008 5:52 PM
The truth is, parents will tell you they're happy with the school pretty much everywhere because they don't want to think they're sending their child to a mediocre school and often the local school is so convenient they don't do much research and just send their kids there because it's easy. Goes along with the study that most parents think their children's schools are good, even while most americans are horribly educated.
Posted by: gkw at November 18, 2008 6:15 PM
As long as we've got 50% thinking the sun goes round the earth and 50% knowing the earth goes round the sun, we've broken even.
Posted by: dittoburg at November 18, 2008 6:18 PM
gwk-the majority of the parents that i know take great inconvenient lengths to take their children to great public & private schools. i mean commuting all over the city. so i greatly disagree with you.
Posted by: bkny at November 18, 2008 6:34 PM
Re: my school research - I did do tons of research already (I visited more than a dozen schools and read/discussed many more) but admittedly I limited it somewhat since there were other reasons I wanted to stay in District 15 beyond just school zone. One school I visited outside District 15 was the Community Roots Charter School, which is amazing. Anyway, I have indeed been hearing good things about PS11, I know PS9 has been getting better, etc. etc. and I certainly agree that there are a lot of up and coming schools that parents can get involved in to make even better. I did not in any way mean to pass judgment on other hoods, simply to say that, at the time we started our search, we limited it for various reasons, including school, and now that one child is already in public school, we don't want to live incredibly far away especially since we want our other child to either attend same school or one nearby. To the person who says I can better afford private school by renting, we very deliberately are seeking to keep our mortgage in line with our rental costs (we are lucky to have trade up cash in hand to do so) so this comment makes no sense. And besides, private school tuition is too expensive for us no matter what, but even if we could afford it, I believe in the principle of public school and am glad to be an active member of my community by being very involved in my local school. Anyway, enough about schools - we can stick to real estate.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 18, 2008 7:05 PM
Good luck with your house-hunting!
I wish all these young families speed getting settled, not having a nervous breakdown doing it, and most importantly: Happiness!
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at November 18, 2008 7:11 PM
the whole schools thing is not so easy to unravel. i have been touring schools and they are so many more options than i thought. miss muffett, there are schools where i live in williamsburg that are probably not on your radar, but are terrific. look at 17, 132 and 84. also, st. nicholas is very reasonable and is doing a great job. our middle school is excellent as well. also, if you are close to the city, there are schools like the earth school or the community school in the east village. also, all of the gifted and talented programs. just branch out. we did, and we got the place we wanted - i mean really everything we wanted for the price - and we have great neighbors and couldn't be happier with our current school or our future choices.
beyond the superficial, think about your actual needs, and try looking at something different maybe. good luck.
Posted by: wine lover at November 18, 2008 8:43 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.