« Here's What 40 Stories in Greenpoint Looks Like Garden of the Day: Contained in the Slope »
November 21, 2008
Babs Corcoran "Not Worried About Real Estate Prices"
She's not worried at all, in fact. That's what she told AMNY in an interview. Also, her advice: buy now. "Real estate will be more expensive once again, and everyone will look back and say, ‘Why didn’t I buy then?’ Because the truth of the matter is these are the good ol’ days everybody dreams about."
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/7308
Comments
Yawn...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNmcf4Y3lGM
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at November 21, 2008 10:16 AM
what a joke.
Posted by: Diego Maradona at November 21, 2008 10:21 AM
The good old days was the $35k my friend paid for a fabulous Clinton Hill brownstone in 1973. That's thirty five thousand dollars.
Posted by: denton at November 21, 2008 10:22 AM
PS...that was great!!!!
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 21, 2008 10:23 AM
Brownstoner has jumped the shark..
This is a great day for me...
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at November 21, 2008 10:28 AM
There are two scenarios that I can see playing out. One the housing market goes down and stays there for 10-15 years. Second the housing market goes down for another 1-5 years and then has another upswing where the best areas appreciate the most and the less wanted areas appreciate modestly. This happens because the cheaper areas will attract people making regular wages. The more expensive areas get more expensive because the government keeps printing like mad and the dollar becomes worth alot less, the people who usually make money in times of inflation are the more educated type. Unfair but this is what happened in the 70's and 80's.
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at November 21, 2008 10:29 AM
"Camaro SS"... very funny.
Posted by: buttermilk channel at November 21, 2008 10:29 AM
Excelsior!!!
Posted by: martis at November 21, 2008 10:30 AM
"That's thirty five thousand dollars."
I like how you spelled that out, like on a bank check. Funny.
Posted by: 25 to 50 Percent Drop at November 21, 2008 10:31 AM
she needs to star in the broadway or movie remake of the golden girls. not sure which one she'd play, but she's gotta do it.
*Rob*
Posted by: PitbullNYC at November 21, 2008 10:31 AM
HOBOKEN...there are an infinite number of scenarios. Chances are very, very high that the two you've picked do not actually happen. Think about it.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 21, 2008 10:32 AM
Brownstoner has jumped ths shark, Lol. This isn't happy days its more like BAD Days.. Barbs is right cuz prices will go up in the future because the government will keep printing ,but for the next couple of years you will be able to get places alot cheaper..
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at November 21, 2008 10:34 AM
PS - Great Vid...passing this one on.
'Granite Countertops'
'stainless steel appliances'
hysterical
Posted by: bayridgegirl at November 21, 2008 10:36 AM
denton- 35K. Fair enough. But remember just how -awful- Clinton Hill was in 1973.
You'd likely get stabbed 35 times walking home from the subway.
Thats ~thirty~ five~ times.
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at November 21, 2008 10:38 AM
well dave their is only up or down, so you either believe we are in a 1929 depression like scenario where properties went down 50 percent or a japan like depression where property went down more. I will say japan's bubble was much bigger than what we have had here. I have read stories where a sq ft of top japanese properties were selling for well over 100 grand at their high. Yes I wrote that correctly over 100 grand a sq ft. That was the biggest bubble ever. Or you believe that prices will go up everywhere and I don't think that will happen. I think the next time you see prices go up they won't go up everywhere. It will only be in certain key areas.
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at November 21, 2008 10:40 AM
I think we should have a poll on Brownstoner: "Who is more pathetic in their attempt to say anything in order to stay in the spotlight in the post-bubble-collapse era"?
a) Babs Corcoran
b) The What
Your vote, please.
Posted by: benson at November 21, 2008 10:44 AM
You don't get it Hoboken. Those are not the only plausible scenarios. Again, think about it.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 21, 2008 10:45 AM
a)
Posted by: 25 to 50 Percent Drop at November 21, 2008 10:51 AM
b) Because Babs has a history of making money off of the bottom of the real estate market. The What is just a 15 minute flameout on a blog who lives in Lodi, NJ and can't seem to be able to construct at least one intelligent sentence.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 21, 2008 10:54 AM
Didn't babs buy in Red Hook thinking it was going to be the next new hot area for gentrification but didn't realize there was no subway supply there?
Posted by: dittoburg at November 21, 2008 10:54 AM
What is so absurd about Babs saying prices are so low now, it's a great time to buy, etc. is that prices are NOT low - they are still shockingly high! Just look at a lot of the recent HOTDs - like that crazy house on 1st St in PS asking over 2mil ("charitably" reduced from 2.3). There are LOADS of overpriced properties on the market now that are just sitting, sitting, sitting, and only a few sellers are actually letting the new reality start to sink in. But really, the price cuts have barely begun. Once they have, THEN it will be a good time to buy - not before. Things need to come down a minimum of 25% more - even 50% - to make sense to buy...
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 21, 2008 10:56 AM
DIBS;
I'm asking for a reconsideration of your vote. This is not a poll about business acumen. Look at the question again: "Who is more pathetic in their attempt to say anything in order to stay in the spotlight in the post-bubble-collapse era"?
Posted by: benson at November 21, 2008 10:57 AM
"Barbs is right cuz prices will go up in the future because the government will keep printing"
No. Hyperinflation will buoy up wages faster than home prices because of residual fear from the collapse and tighter lending standards. Real prices will still fall.
Babs is a living advertisement. Walking propaganda if you will.
Posted by: 25 to 50 Percent Drop at November 21, 2008 10:57 AM
That last picture of Babs looked like Mary Tyler Moore. Todays pic she looks like Ellen deGeneres.
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at November 21, 2008 10:58 AM
Pure emotion @ 10:54 (daveinbedstuy).
Posted by: 25 to 50 Percent Drop at November 21, 2008 11:01 AM
Yes PS...looks like even more work was done on that "facade."
benson...the What is more pathetic no matter who you compare him too for whatever reason. I admit I may have missed your point though. Stills eething that my truffle was taken off of the Forum. mr. B is gonna pay.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 21, 2008 11:02 AM
"ROTW uses the same language as the unscrupulous "block-buster" real-estate agents who operated so effectively in NYC during the "white flight" days of the 60's. They peddled fear, and bought homes on the cheap from those who fled. He fails to understand that this is a different era. He may be trying to do the same thing, as there are runmours that he is a real estate agent. Pay no attention to him."
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
BTW 25 to 50 Percent Drop you almost made me spit up my coffee!
Posted by: Return of The What at November 21, 2008 11:04 AM
25 to 50...I think we can all agree that Babs has made far more money than the What on real estate and has done so by correctly celling the market more than a few times. Facts, not emotion.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 21, 2008 11:06 AM
i am shocked -- shocked! -- that a prominent broker remains openly upbeat about the housing market.
Posted by: z at November 21, 2008 11:12 AM
"denton- 35K. Fair enough. But remember just how -awful- Clinton Hill was in 1973. "
PS, actually, he was my roommate, but considerably older. I was just a kid. I didn't get stabbed, or robbed, altho folx didn't like white people walking on Fulton Street, if i recall.
Posted by: denton at November 21, 2008 11:14 AM
What's Jerry Minsky's take on all of this??? Can't he get himself a column somewhere??
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 21, 2008 11:14 AM
Barbs is right cuz prices will go up in the future because the government will keep printing"
No. Hyperinflation will buoy up wages faster than home prices because of residual fear from the collapse and tighter lending standards. Real prices will still fall.
Babs is a living advertisement. Walking propaganda if you will.
Barbs is right cuz prices will go up in the future, I wrote this but I have also written that it will take 5-15 years before homes get back to the prices they were at their highest. Yes wages should be propped up before homes but I would also look at commodoties because every country is reflating. Unless we get price controls in place like the 70's . Though Gold should still do well.
I predicted a couple of months ago that every country would have to reflate. I also believe that the best areas will always command more money. I don't know which areas will be the best in the future. One thing is for sure NYC will still be one of the better areas but will lose some of its luster because financials will take decades before they come back to previous levels.
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at November 21, 2008 11:29 AM
Hands down the most blatantly self-serving statement of the year. Not surprising at all that Minsky got the axe for saying something negative about real estate. (Not that I'm feeling sorry for him at all.)
Posted by: Nobrokersplease at November 21, 2008 11:39 AM
From all I've seen nobody anywhere is saying the real estate market is dropping over the next 10 years as somebody above claimed. The news shows and networks are bringing on a lot of expert economists and if they talk about property values they're saying prices will keep going down over the next year or two. Anywhere from 2010 to 2012 marks the bottom according to them. They talk about how building has slowed or stopped completely, depending on what part of the country you're in, and it's about waiting for this big oversupply to dwindle. In NYC our oversupply is condos not houses. However if buyers think they're going to get better prices a year or two from now they'll certainly be very hesitant to put in offers now.
But I still don't see this 50% thing. If sellers are hearing from experts we will start to see a recovery in property values 3 to 5 years from now, perhaps more quickly in NYC, they won't be in such a hurry as some think to take a $500K to million dollar loss on a house. Also don't forget NYC is a strong rental market. In the suburbs or in other regions in the country, a property sits empty if you can't sell it. Here you can rent out your apt, condo or house for however many years is required. It gives NYC sellers the option to hang onto a property before selling, that sellers elsewhere don't have.
Posted by: traditionalmod at November 21, 2008 11:59 AM
HOBOKENROCKS there will be no more INFLATION!! Every asset class is getting smashed.
The Government is not "Printing" money, they are borrowing it a 0% interest!
This crash in oil is telling you that things has change and the Government efforts are "pushing on a string"!
I was listing to Bloomberg radio last night and they said 64 out of 64 funds are down for the year! Everything is toast and the only thing that would re-inflate every thing is a war.
Look at the Bond Market! The biggest rally since 1987!
http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/index.html
Ten year at 3.22% and BTW Your Home loans will not get cheaper for Jumbo's!
The What (But..but..but Real Estate always goes up, right?)
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at November 21, 2008 12:00 PM
Oh but to get back on topic, I agree Barbara Corcoran is not somebody I would trust to give objective advice to real estate buyers.
Posted by: traditionalmod at November 21, 2008 12:01 PM
Anyone else find it peculiar --other than crediting a scum-feeding propagandist like Babs --that we're not talking about a.) the wealth effect of the worst market crash since 1929; b.) the evaporation in a matter of days of CITI; c.) the disappearance of the banking industry as we knew it, and d.) the collapse of the consumer's balance sheet, and the high likelihood of an 8-10% troughing out of GDP? Do people still think RE prices are set by the terms on typical offer here on Brownstoner (comps, etc.)? (We're not even mentioning the possibility of full-on deflationary bust; nor the possible collapse of the dollar.)
In the spirit of the above: My own vote goes to DIBS, whom I find hateful in every way.
Posted by: Whuh at November 21, 2008 12:14 PM
Mr. What , yes they are printing or monetizing. I will explain. Any time the fed goes and purchases worthless securities as collateral, puts money into banks that have no way of paying this money back, gives Wells Fargo 100 billion dollar tax exemption to purchase Wachovia they are printing. I hear the fed is also buying our 10 yr treasuries to bring down long term rates. This is the classic definition of Monetization which is printing. The tarp money will come from borrowing. But how did they allow Wells that 100 billion write off for Wachovia. That has been done yet they aren't selling any bonds to cover that. Dudes all the gov guys are sophists and will do anything to confuse you.There is a reason their is no transparency. Allan Greenspan was the biggest of all sophists...
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at November 21, 2008 12:16 PM
denton- 35K. Fair enough. But remember just how -awful- Clinton Hill was in 1973.
You'd likely get stabbed 35 times walking home from the subway.
Thats ~thirty~ five~ times.
Good point! That's p~o~i~n~t.
Posted by: BrooklynButler at November 21, 2008 12:24 PM
As for inflation , yes it is dead at this moment. But it will come alive as soon as we debase our currency which is what we are doing now. Though all other countries are doing the same thing so we will see if inflation comes about. It may take years, it may not. We will see. The difference between what we have today and the great depression is that we were on the gold standard back then and we cut the money supply. We aren't doing that rite now. But the stock market will take us where we are going. If it keeps crashing than deflation will last very long, if the market stops going down because of all the government intervention ,than we will get inflation at one point.
This could take 5-10 years though. If you look at the 70's we had a similar scenario. They debased our currency and we went from deflation to stagflation. This too could come. Deflation in certain assets and inflation in others. This is probably the worst of all outcomes.. It all depends on what the government does.
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at November 21, 2008 12:29 PM
benson,
They are both a bit absurd and I wouldn't take real estate or investment advice from either one. But I vote b). When BC starts posting three times daily on the brownstoner forum pages with photos of nuclear tests and starts swearing like a sailor at anyone on this site who dares to suggest that she is a little bit absurd, I will switch my vote.
Posted by: slopefarm at November 21, 2008 12:31 PM
" I hear the fed is also buying our 10 yr treasuries to bring down long term rates. "
WRONG This is flight to safety!!!!! There is fear and blood on the floor!
" This is the classic definition of Monetization which is printing. The tarp money will come from borrowing. But how did they allow Wells that 100 billion write off for Wachovia. That has been done yet they aren't selling any bonds to cover that. Dudes all the gov guys are sophists and will do anything to confuse you.There is a reason their is no transparency. Allan Greenspan was the biggest of all sophists..."
You cannot make anyone loan you money or make some borrow it and if you aretrading with this thesis you are going to get a live chainsaw shoved up your but! You trading account will be a smoldering ruin and you will say " I should've listen to that whack job"
Be very very careful Hobo.. Listen to people with track records...
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: Return of The What at November 21, 2008 12:53 PM
Ah, Ms. Corcoran, the lady who recommended that we pave over our front yards to increase the value of our homes. It all comes back: I Photoshopped her head being extruded from the chute of a cement truck for my blog. Perhaps the houses thus entombed from curb to foundation walls in a good thick layer of asphalt will be the very ones to hold their value after all, as they provide a final resting place for the last generation of Hummers to rust on.
Ghastly woman.
Posted by: Brenda from Flatbush at November 21, 2008 1:03 PM
Well, prices have NOT come down. Barbara Corcoran is full of s*#t. Most people who actually follow the market can see this. A 10-20% price cut over a ridiculously inflated asking price IS NOT equivalent to prices coming down. NYC still has a ways to go before it's the "good ol' days everyone dreams about." People are not that naive.
Posted by: nyc87 at November 21, 2008 1:08 PM
Ms Muffett not to worry Bab is only doing her job you know. We expected nothing less from her after all she "earns" her living on sales commissions. As someone else said above "Babs is a living advertisement. Walking propaganda if you will".
We read something in the NYTimes the other day to effect that during a depression if you have money you can afford more i.e. be patient my dear and you will have your choice of brownstones @ discount prices...ca sera une belle affaire ma chere :)
Posted by: pierre de taille at November 21, 2008 1:21 PM
Prodigal Son--that clip is hilarious.
Posted by: wasder at November 21, 2008 1:27 PM
"...but I would also look at commodoties because every country is reflating. Unless we get price controls in place like the 70's . Though Gold should still do well."
I agree.
Posted by: 25 to 50 Percent Drop at November 21, 2008 1:29 PM
"25 to 50...I think we can all agree that Babs has made far more money than the What on real estate and has done so by correctly celling the market more than a few times. Facts, not emotion."
That was then. This now. The poll asked...
Again, as a seller's cheerleader, Babs is doing her job. It is contrary to what she really thinks. Her purchase in Stuy Heights was well before Black October.
Posted by: 25 to 50 Percent Drop at November 21, 2008 1:35 PM
Mr. What I think I have the best track record of any person I have seen on TV or other. I have called this market to the tee. You are not understanding my point.
Look when the fed took worthless securities on their balance sheet they did not need to borrow for this. That is printing becauSe they essentially are giving money in exchange for worthless securities. That is printing or monetization. The feds balance sheet is over 2 trillion. Tell me what those securities are worth now? With deflation killing everything the fed has just taken worthless paper and made them into dollars. They don't need to borrow to put things on their balance sheet. They exchange US dollars for anything they think has value. Bear Stearns Super Subprime CDO's based on crazy models will never be worth anything.. So in fact they have printed to take these securities. It is the same thing as buying our government bonds. Which You write is a flight to quality and I too believe this ,but don't underestimate the governments role in this.. Either way they are printing.
Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at November 21, 2008 1:35 PM
While everyone is talking about how formerly wealthy grandparents are no longer able to subsidize private school tuitions, no one is talking about how probably half of all NYC sales of coops, condos, and houses have been facilitated by the same formerly wealthy segment. No more gifts of $50-100K for downpayments. That will put a real crimp in sales -- one that has not been felt at all yet!
Posted by: BH76 at November 21, 2008 1:36 PM
z that is too funny:
"i am shocked -- shocked! -- that a prominent broker remains openly upbeat about the housing market".
nyc87: we cannot agree more; does she think folks are stupid? Absolute rubbish Babs! Wake up femme.
"Well, prices have NOT come down. Barbara Corcoran is full of s*#t. Most people who actually follow the market can see this. A 10-20% price cut over a ridiculously inflated asking price IS NOT equivalent to prices coming down. NYC still has a ways to go before it's the "good ol' days everyone dreams about." People are not that naive".
Posted by: pierre de taille at November 21, 2008 1:38 PM
This is the new Kool-Aid--trying to convince potential buyers that NOW IS THE TIME!! Buy now or be forever priced out when prices start to rise soon!! Simply ridiculous.
Posted by: bk14 at November 21, 2008 2:08 PM
Fox reports, "Henhouse is secure."
Posted by: SnarkSlope at November 21, 2008 2:17 PM
Nice to meet you too Whuh. I always hold What spinoffs in high regard. Go screw.
Sorry to be late back to the party. Just had lunch at La Grenouille.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 21, 2008 2:25 PM
I was trying to look up a quote by Mark Twain about real estate and found these instead:
What we call real estate - the solid ground to build a house on - is the broad foundation on which nearly all the guilt of this world rests.
- Nathaniel Hawthorne
In a real estate man's eye, the most expensive part of the city is where he has a house to sell
-Will Rogers
Anybody remember the Mark Twain one?
Posted by: bayridgegirl at November 21, 2008 2:44 PM
"Fox reports, "Henhouse is secure."
Thank you for cracking me up, yet again, Snark, I needed that!
Posted by: cobblehiller at November 21, 2008 3:04 PM
Traditionamod - re: your argument about how a lot of people will sit tight - many, many people were not able to "sit tight" during the last market downturn (late 80s/early 90s) and financial conditions are arguably MUCH worse now than they were then. Many people can't just easily rent out a whole house if they are underwater and/or need money for their retirement since their 401K has vaporized. So I find this a specious argument. Also, I put little faith in the "experts" saying this will be a short-lived problem - where were these experts when the writing was on the wall? Cripes - was Enron not enough of a warning bell? Let's face it, we've lived through an unbelievable asset bubble and the correction will be long and painful - if anything, New Yorkers who bought real estate longer than 3-5 years ago are a bit cushioned since this is the last of the assets to be affected so can sustain a 50% fall and leave many people breaking even.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 21, 2008 3:10 PM
must. . . resist. . . picking on miss muffett. . .
so. . . difficult. . .
Posted by: z at November 21, 2008 3:45 PM
miss muffett - well, yes, you can always sit tight and rent. who on this board bought at the height, but somehow needs to sell to fund their retirement in 2-5 years? that makes them 60 now? anyone near retirement certainly did not buy a house at the height of the market.
personally, if i had to move, i'd rent my place out. i know for damn sure, that in the not so terribly long run, i'll be making plenty of money.
also, whole supply and demand thing can not be so easily dismissed either. we still have a small supply versus a large demand in regards to real estate in new york city, but right now, everyone is in fear mode, so no deals are happening. supply will actually really really go down when the following 3 things happen -
1) new buildings go rental instead of condo
2) population increases
3) very few new condo buildings get started/built
AND, unlike the last downturn, interest rates are crazy crazy low. i remember when in bought in 1997, and couldn't believe the 7% + rate i got. you cannot talk about previous time periods without talking about interest rates. they were up in the teens!
don't get me wrong, i understand the the world is in a financial crisis right now, but the 10 year downturn won't happen.
Posted by: wine lover at November 21, 2008 4:36 PM
wine lover - you misunderstood me. I did not mean that the people who have lost their retirement savings are those who bought at the height. On the contrary, there are tons of people out there who bought a long time ago who are probably now retirees or close to it. People who bought a long time ago (more than 10 yrs) can still make a killing, even if prices come way down, since prices skyrocketed in last 10 years - all those folks who bought brownstones for less than 500K that shot up to 2-3million, and now, even if they go down to 1.5-1 million, it's still a lot. Even many people who bought as recently as 5 years would do fine even with a major correction. I'm not saying this downturn must last 10 years, but I also think it's possible it could. There are too many variables at stake for any of us to know the answer. How policy-makers react to this crisis will make a big difference. But many economists and financial experts recognize that this is a unique historical moment that followed a very long, sustained bubble. And, no matter what you or others say, some people always need to sell. Also, the population pressures you quote could also change in the years to come - it's happened before.
What galls me is the assertion that now is a great time to buy in NYC since there is a perception that prices have come down so much, but historically, they are still unbelievably high. The only difference is that they are now no longer going up, and more and more sellers are starting to crack and either start cutting prices, or in some cases, are starting to put things on the market at less aggressive prices. But they are in the minority. Eventually, others will join them. This is all classic bubble stuff since it takes a while for sellers to finally adjust to new price levels. But pretty much everyone on this blog, bulls included, have now conceded that prices will readjust - the only real debate is how much, how long.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 21, 2008 5:17 PM
muffett,
dont forget that many of those old time buyers may have HELOC-ATM'd their way into poverty.
Posted by: jdoo at November 21, 2008 6:00 PM
miss muffett - well, hell, i'm not telling anyone to buy. but, having been a brownstone buyer in 1996, i can say that i don't think we're going anywhere near those prices not because of the bubble, but because the demand for brooklyn has increased beyond immensely huge for brooklyn property. when i moved to brooklyn then, barely anyone i spoke to in day to day life had a clue as to why i did it or where the hell i lived.
the demand isn't going to collapse to the point where the psf prices on brownstones become cheap.
in any case, in any market it's very very difficult to find any property you want to buy. i've always had to look really hard to find a place that worked in my price range regardless of what that was. hell, i'd sometimes look at places i couldn't even afford and hate them.
if you ever find something that works, i would say buy that place, not just buy to buy.
Posted by: wine lover at November 21, 2008 8:16 PM
wine lover - I would not call 500-600 psf for a brownstone in a prime part of Brooklyn that cheap. That's still 1.4-1.5 for, say a modest 3 story brownstone. And yet, sellers still have such properties on the market for over 2 million dollars which is insane. I agree that demand has increased in recent years, but I'm not so sure you can count on that to prop up prices forever, esp when NYC is facing an era of potentially higher taxes, service cuts, etc. Just look at every other sector of our economy right now. Demand has fallen off the cliff for just about everything else, so why would NYC real estate be the one sole exception to this? But yes, I agree that finding a place you like is hard - we have had the same experience in buying in the past. This is why we are actively looking all the time, and not trying to "wait" til market bottoms out per se -- but we are also not financially stupid, so will refuse to overpay even for a nice place we like - as we've also learned in the past, there's always another.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 22, 2008 12:22 AM
Prices certainly have come down a lot in New York already. They are off 30 to 40 percent in the "marginal" areas of brownstone Brooklyn since 2006 and 10 to 15 percent in the "prime" areas since the beginning of the year. This mirrors what has happened in the rest of the country already during this downtown and previous ones. The question is how much worse can it get? There are likely to be worse job cuts (and no new job creation) than in previous downturns and if you can no longer do 20 percent on a jumbo loan, that's a big difference. But don't forget there are plenty of wealthy people living here. Barring complete collapse and no police, we're not going back to the 1970s. New York City is becoming a wealthy area like Boston, SF, Paris. Except for the 1970s, it's always been a place that's difficult for the average person to afford going back to the 1840s.
Posted by: mopar at November 22, 2008 12:44 PM
The homeowners (and importantly the renters and potential buyers) of brownstone Brooklyn in the 80's are COMPLETELY different from all those in the same neighborhoods now, Miss Muffet.
Here's the truth and the rule you can't get around: For a really big price drop to occur it can't just be that people have less money to spend but the supply has to increase and do so substantially. So far, the inventory of houses for sale in Brooklyn brownstone neighborhoods has not shot up. In the rest of the U.S. where values dropped the most, those aren't cases where the inventory dropped too. It's the opposite; the inventory is huge in those places. Massive. In the places where inventory is more steady they're doing much better. You just can't reinvent all the rules of economics.
The ability to rent is what will help keep our available inventory from being so crazy high like it is in other areas of the U.S. and it helps owners hang in there however long it takes. For people to willingly take a loss of several hundred thousand to a million dollars on a brownstone in your main targeted area of Park Slope, Miss Muffet, that would be a foreclosure and bankruptcy. Not just a little ole job transfer or divorce. And so far, thank goodness (because it's a good thing when people do okay in bad times!) there have hardly been any foreclosures in Park Slope or the historic brownstone neighborhoods. People who have to sadly divorce, or are transferred, will rent out their houses if need be. You've said your targeted areas are the best school districts -- people don't have a problem renting out family size properties in those school districts.
In the end the mere idea you'd actually want this to happen so you can invest in a house is so strange. Looking at all the factors above if we had such a huge downturn it would look more like this -- a continuous drop in prices over many years resulting in values of prime brownstone neighborhoods reaching 50% lower 8-10 years from now, and then taking 5-10 years to recover. In which case you would SO not be buying, you'd continue renting for a long long time. If you really do want to buy a house in the next couple years as you say, not rent, and hope for it to be a decent investment for you and your family, you should be hoping to find a 25-30% discount and a rebound starting to occur at least 5 year from now. It's for this reason I actually don't believe you really believe in the whole 50% discount thing.
Posted by: traditionalmod at November 22, 2008 2:20 PM
Traditionalmod - I'd be happy to get a 25-30% discount, and I'm not saying I WANT a 50% discount. Only saying that anything is possible in this market - the only thing that is sure is that some significant correction will occur. Again, exact number depends on many factors. Also, today's NYT reported the beginning of an increase of inventory - exactly what starts to happen at beginning of the end of a bubble. Will inventory shoot up sky high? Probably not (then again, did anyone expect to see what's going on in every other financial sector?). But really, I do not think expecting prices in the 500s psf on a modest house is so outrageous - in fact, it's a pretty healthy number! A lot of places were going for in the 300s as recently as 2001...And there are plenty of good schools (154, 10, 295, 39, 107 etc.) which are hardly in the "prime" areas of PS. As far as I'm concerned, a lot of places are still way overpriced, but we are starting (*just* starting) to see that change and can happily wait to find the right thing as this trend continues. As I've said repeatedly, we're not waiting for a market crash or bottom, just a return to rationality...
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 22, 2008 2:41 PM
Miss Muffet, the article on inventory increase you're talking about in the NYT is exclusively about Manhattan apartments. Most of us are living in Brooklyn neighborhoods where we know exactly what houses are on the market and how many. So it's hard to convince us there are larger waves of brownstones hitting the market.
The thing is for your targeted areas you can't only compare the PSF with what the PSF was 5-10 years ago to determine whether it makes sense, because these-a-days you have to compare that PSF to Manhattan too. Those Brooklyn areas are now competitive with Manhattan for the new wave of family buyers. Which is something new.
Posted by: traditionalmod at November 22, 2008 2:57 PM
Traditionamod - we can go back and forth til we're blue in the face. Cleary we both are coming at this from different points of view. Just curious - what do you think will happen to the brownstone Bklyn market? If you see declines, what's your gut re: percentage drop?
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 22, 2008 3:30 PM
Also mopar, please show stats to back up what you're saying about prices already being down by so much. Yes, they are starting to come down somewhat, but are still sky-high. And actually, the mid-90s was a great time for people of modest means to buy - I know tons of people who did so. You and the other bulls can say whatever you want, but it all sounds like denial to me. I'm not saying that things will crash (though I think a 50% decline, given the run-up, would not even constitute a "crash) but I am truly amazed by the degree of defensiveness and continuing attempts to explain why NYC will defy what is happening all around us everywhere. Again, I'm not denying that some of the factors cited make sense but they are already factored into prices that are extremely high and went up to clearly unsustainable levels - and even with large declines, would **still** be high by just about any measure.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 22, 2008 9:05 PM
One more thing, since I just can't let the distortions stand. TM, you write: "For people to willingly take a loss of several hundred thousand to a million dollars on a brownstone in your main targeted area of Park Slope, Miss Muffet, that would be a foreclosure and bankruptcy."
Let's do the math. Prime brownstones were going for around, even under, a million as recently as 2001 (we're talking 4 story 20 footers in PS for example). As of very recently, the asks on these were 2.5mil and up. So, let's say there's a major correction and that kind of property goes for 1.5, which of course is a steep decline. But, that price is still well above what many owners paid, so how is that taking a loss as you say?
I agree that those who purchased at the peak may indeed be forced to take a loss, and those are the people who will fight the hardest not to and do whatever they can but not all of them will be in a position to just rent it out easily to cover their bills anyway, since purchase prices went so far above rents.
I also realize that some people HELOC'ed their way into financial disaster, and that is truly tragic if they are now in over their heads but that's not quite the same thing as simply looking at the unprecedented rise in prices.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 22, 2008 11:30 PM
Interesting conversation. Would any of you wizards be real investors? If so perhaps someone's interested in a four unit brownstone in Harlem below 125th street West of Seventh Avenue? Asking $1,050,000...seller financing optional...has existing rent roll but can be delivered vacant.
Posted by: bblogspot at November 24, 2008 12:20 AM
The truth of the matter is that all of you are right on some level our another. If one bedroom condos in Manhattan below 96th street were to drop to $500K and two bed condos to $750K, everyone would be running to the bank for a mortgage or asking a rich friend to spot them the cash. But, that's not our reality. Our reality is that we have a bunch of $500K one beds and $750K two beds located in (some cases) remote and/or unpopular areas of Brooklyn.
The bottom line is that those Brooklyn one beds and two beds should be priced at $30Ok and $500K because anyone that can get a mortgage right now over $500K or has a rich friend that can spot the cash, is simply not buying a condo in a remote and unpopular local in Brooklyn...no matter how spanking brand new it is.
Posted by: bblogspot at November 24, 2008 12:31 AM
z - hahahahafunny
Posted by: gkw at November 24, 2008 10:44 AM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.