« Coney Island Ave Gets New Restaurant Number 9: The Media »

October 24, 2008

Number 10: Daniel Goldstein

dan-goldstein-1008.jpgAtlantic Yards developer Bruce Ratner didn't know who he was messing with when he set out to seize the home of Daniel Goldstein, co-founder of Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn, a highly sophisticated coalition of 26 community organizations leading the fight against that project. Although the group has only had one court victory to-date, which was overturned, their protests and series of lawsuits and appeals have managed to stall the project into credit crunch territory, possibly jeopardizing its financing. The court's recent decision to deny the state's motion to dismiss the eminent domain case, led by Goldstein, has pushed construction (if started) back to at least Spring 2009, and the court's decision will likely be used in other eminent domain cases involving private developers across the country. Goldstein will be the most memorable Brooklyn community activist of this decade, fearlessly (at all hours of the day) speaking for thousands.
Brooklyn's Top 50 Most Influential No. 11-20 [Brownstoner]
Brooklyn's Top 50 Most Influential No. 21-30 [Brownstoner]
Brooklyn's Top 50 Most Influential No. 31-40 [Brownstoner]
Brooklyn's Top 50 Most Influential No. 41-50 [Brownstoner]
Photo by Steve Soblick




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/6854

Comments

I can't believe this trust fund wretch is considered influential in any way shape or form.

If it wasn't for his rich parents and the spiteful support of Weinstein, he'd go back to his parents home from which be was spawned.

What a loser.

Posted by: Polemicist at October 24, 2008 11:10 AM

Oh go to you-know-what, Polemicist. Whether or not you like DG's actions should have nothing to do with whether or not he's got a trust fund. If he does, more power to him for standing up to AY when he could've walked away with his money.

Posted by: cmu at October 24, 2008 11:21 AM

Ple just wants it to be 100% affordable housing. Think the neighborhood looks bad now?? Watch out if that ever happened.

Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 24, 2008 11:23 AM

I can see him maybe as #50 - but on top Ten? c'mon. That is more an indication of Brownstoner obsession with AY.
A 1 issue person. Marketplace and economy will determine AY - not Goldstein.

Posted by: Petebklyn at October 24, 2008 11:23 AM

This is a tough town. In order to be effective, especially in bucking the powers that be, it really helps to be thick skinned, obnoxious, relentless and frankly, a class A a@@hole. I don't care what kind of money Daniel Goldstein has, had, or will have. I don't even have to like him, but I admire his tenacity.

Think of it, he and his organization held up the largest building project in the city of New York for almost three years. During that time, Forest City Ratner has had to rethink its plans several times, spend a fortune on PR concerns, another fortune on legal fees, and still hasn't laid two bricks on top of each other in all of this time. During those three years, we've seen the easily predicted condo glut come to pass, as well as the also predicted financial mess which may be the final nail on the coffin to any huge mega project. Develop Don't Destroy may not have been the sword thrust to the heart of AY, but their thousand cuts may have bled them dry, and done the same job.

The best thing that can come out of this is that Ratner sells the site to smaller developers who can intelligently build necessary housing, business and recreational facilities in a less rancorous and irresponsible manner.

Kudos to Goldstein.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 24, 2008 11:36 AM

Polemicist, you're the guy who the other day admitted to never hearing of Bertha Lewis? seems like you're really on top of things.

Posted by: aytoofly at October 24, 2008 11:40 AM

Unfortunelty I would love to agree withyou MM but this site is going to stay in the current stat of disaray for years because of all the hurdles that were put in place. Nobody wins and it continues to be an eyesore on downtown BK. It's a shame either way.

Posted by: Adam Dahill at October 24, 2008 11:40 AM

I will take an eyesore and the prospect of a civilized public development of the planned private AY complex with demapped streets and private parks any day.

Posted by: BH76 at October 24, 2008 12:00 PM

aytoofly:

Oh, I have heard of Bertha Lewis. Just not the demagogue that was featured on this site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertha_Lewis

Posted by: Polemicist at October 24, 2008 1:53 PM

MM:

There is no "condo glut".

A glut of any good implies there is no or limited demand. That is not the case in this city. The demand is enormous. Developers may not get the prices they originally desired, and banks may even foreclose on properties - but there will be buyers. The only question is when and at what price.

People said the same thing about Hell's Kitchen in the early 1990s. So much for that "glut".

With Bloomberg poised to sail into a third term, I think you will find Atlantic Yards is constructed anyway. More than anyone else, he knows building more housing is more crucial now than ever before if this city is to redefine itself.

The stadium may very well get cut, but the residential development will get started.

Posted by: Polemicist at October 24, 2008 1:59 PM

Polemicist, do you read the numerous condo articles on this site, look around you, or even read posts carefully, or do you just throw out knee jerk reactions to people you generally disagree with?

When countless condo buildings across the city can't sell a majority of units, even at reduced prices, when so many begin construction as condos and open as rentals, and even more are in the pipeline to nil interest, then there is a condo glut. Even before the economic downturn beginning in earnest a few months ago, you couldn't give some of these apartments away. Too many are being built, many are of dubious quality, or in poor locations, like overlooking the BQE or a junkyard, and most are overpriced. No matter the reason for their non movement, there are a lot of empty apartments out there. Glut, pure and simple.

And if you read, I encourage somebody, many somebodies actually, to develop the AY site, most people, including Goldstein, do. We do need housing, but please don't thow that up as a ridiculous smokescreen for allowing Bruce Ratner to have his way. His AY does very little for the kind of housing needed for the majority of Brooklyn families.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 24, 2008 3:13 PM

Daniel Goldstein influential? You guys are nuts. I suspect that this guy no longer lives in Brooklyn, but only returns occasionally for the now rare photo op. He and his organization have done nothing significant, losing every major court battle, and will ultimately fail to stop Ratner and Atlantic Yards.

Posted by: Big Jugs at October 24, 2008 5:01 PM

Can we call AY Goldstein's Hole until it gets built?

Posted by: slick at October 24, 2008 5:28 PM

I'm with BH76 and MM. AY has been an eyesore for years, but I'd rather look at it this way a little longer and get it right. Ratner's AY will be a big mistake.

Posted by: bxgrl at October 24, 2008 6:01 PM

Agree with Montrose. Ratner's AY is far too dense, would collapse the sewer system, fails to deliver REAL affordable housing and completely skirts public process. Sure, you've read all that before. But finally a significant number of elected officials have come out against the plan and at last there's a move in Albany to establish proper oversight. As someone who lives 2 blocks from the footprint, I would still rather endure the mess (so, please, stop the demolitions already!) and delays than see the wrong thing built here. I'm not prepared to give up a vision of a decent development to expediency or hopelessness. I have disagreed with many of DG's tactics over the last 4-5 years but I'm glad his -- and DDDb's --actions have prevented this disaster from moving forward.

Posted by: NeoGrec at October 24, 2008 6:43 PM

which tactics?

Posted by: aytoofly at October 24, 2008 10:48 PM

Go, Daniel, go.

While I only wish AY would go away, he has effectively taken on powerful forces to stop it. I admire him and all the other activists that haven't given in to greed, hubris, apathy or pessimism.

Posted by: EinFG at October 24, 2008 11:03 PM

EinFG, how has he been effective when he's lost every court battle? If anything has delayed AY, it's the economy, not the actions of this wannabe rich-boy "activist".

Posted by: Big Jugs at October 25, 2008 5:26 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions