« Wednesday Links Does Your Front Door Belong to Everyone in the Co-op? »

October 1, 2008

Has the Bubble Finally Burst?

bubble_0908.jpg
The NY Post certainly thinks so. They report that single-family home prices fell in the city 7.4% from July of '07 to July '08 (though the number is 16.3% for cities they surveyed overall). They point to a Park Slope brownstone whose price has sunk from $2.8 million in January to $2.35 million now; still seems like pretty close to bubble prices to some folks around here. We've been seeing prices fall in some new condo projects around town. So is this it, the moment you've been dreading or dreaming of?
NY $$-Home Bubble Bursts [NY Post]
Bubble. Photo by Pepa....!




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/6488

Comments

So now I declare every negative comment will be a angry renter. So lame.

Posted by: sebb at October 1, 2008 9:16 AM

sebb-

Why would renters be angry now?

Unless you are paying high rents, renters should be pretty content.

Posted by: Prodigal_Son at October 1, 2008 9:21 AM

Absolutely... renters are now all thinking, "Hey you fools, you've gotten your comeuppance! Suck on it!" Or something like that.

Posted by: tybur6 at October 1, 2008 9:30 AM

Because renters are the only people on this board who comment. The real fact is prices in Nyc did not even go up anywhere near what South Florida , Vegas and AZ did So they wont be falling anywhere near those markets
Yet the fools who are renters continue to bash NYC. After this Bill gets passed tonight you will see the Bottom in 2009.

Posted by: sebb at October 1, 2008 9:36 AM

sebb, you sound very bitter. I am a renter and I am pretty happy about this news. The people that should be bitter are potential sellers in this market and home owners that are paying mortages for a home that is worth more than what their home is actually worth.

But it really doesn't matter if potential buyers are unable to get a home loan, which is the problem in this market.

Posted by: gatesave at October 1, 2008 9:49 AM

"So is this it, the moment you've been dreading or dreaming of?"

Not quite. Although I know prices will fall significantly as this is a once-in-a-lifetime boom/bust like '29, my moment will come at the closing table. But I am salivating. The bubble burst in 2006. It is denial that has finally burst.

"Yet the fools who are renters continue to bash NYC"

Prices, Sebb. We bash the prices. We are very happy and we love NYC!!! Big shout out to all the renters who waited and saved. Also shout out to all the owners who have swallowed their pride and denial. Good luck selling or holding on, whatever you have to do.

Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at October 1, 2008 9:57 AM

sebb-

" Because renters are the only people on this board who comment."

Am I the only one here who finds the exact -opposite- to be true?

" Yet the fools who are renters continue to bash NYC."

Many renters are fools, many are not. Many renters don't bash NYC, many do. Whats your point?

" After this Bill gets passed tonight you will see the Bottom in 2009."

I'll agree with ya there, sebb.

Posted by: Prodigal_Son at October 1, 2008 9:58 AM

"But it really doesn't matter if potential buyers are unable to get a home loan, which is the problem in this market."

Very true, I'm afraid.

Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at October 1, 2008 9:58 AM

Bitter renter here!

Take a look at the actual Case-Shiller data. January 2000 is the baseline and since then NY property prices have increased over 92%, the highest behind Washington DC. Las Vegas is up 54%, Miami is up 87%, and Phoenix is up 49%. Why is it that you think the NY metro area will not be affected as those other areas are?

Keep in mind these are percentages and not based on absolute dollar amounts. Prices will come down until they are in line with household income.

Posted by: j2 at October 1, 2008 10:12 AM

sebb, my guess is lots of owners, including me, post on Brownstoner. And I never found the renters who contribute to the blog bitter or angry. Quite the opposite; the regulars who identify themselves as renters are valuable contributors who seem to really love Brooklyn and be as involved in the community as much as anyone else.

While it is now their time in terms of likely being able to negotiate much lower rents, I do agree with you that if they choose to purchase and are hoping to take advantage of lower home prices, getting mortgage financing is going to be far more difficult now and going forward.

Posted by: Biff Champion at October 1, 2008 10:12 AM

I'm another bitter renter. I sold a place before moving to Brooklyn and decided to wait on the sidelines for a year or so.

I'm not sure what will happen in the next year or so- no one does. But I do think the credit crunch will go on for awhile, there will be no cheap money. Also NYC will have a lot less money floating around- a lot less bonuses and high financial salaries. With that mix prices are going to go way down. I think a young couple priced out of Manhattan and considered Brooklyn, could probably afford Manhattan soon. I know everyone on this board loves Brooklyn but that was a large buying pool. The long and short is that I will probably look to buy this time next year.

Posted by: 7andfive at October 1, 2008 10:21 AM

j2: two questions - 1) does the case-shiller data you're looking at go through 2008? florida and the west already have declined precipitously since 2006. not sure if that affects your data. 2) is there data that suggests that nyc prices historically have been in line with nyc household income?

Posted by: i disagree at October 1, 2008 10:25 AM

sebb-- You are consistently obnoxious, angry, bitter, disparaging, and smug about those of us who do not own. Why the vitriol?

I rent, and I do so because I love this city (which is my hometown) and made a choice to stay. In order to own, I need to move. I've done the research. That's the reality of my financial picture. I'm at peace with it. I don't think owning is a God-given right. This is and always has been a tough city, and while I count myself a success in many many important ways, I don't make enough to buy a place here. Would you call me bitter? Angry? A fool?

I'm a "make the pie larger and give everyone a bigger piece" kind of person, so I'm actually sorrowful about this whole mess. With the exception of flippers and vampiric developers, I think most people wanted a place to live and call their own and got understandably excited about watching the value of their investment grow. I think a lot of people got played on their way to the American dream. It's a mess. It's not the end of the world. For myself, I am not enjoying anyone "get their comeuppance and suck it" or whatever. I feel bad for people who are hurting. That's called being a human being and and good neighbor. You might want to give it a try. Feels pretty good.

Posted by: I_haz_TWO_toilets at October 1, 2008 10:25 AM

I want to know which brownstone it was that was reduced in PS. Is some overzealous owner/real estate agent an indicator of a bubble bursting when they finally lower their brownstone to a reasonable price after it doesn't sell for the good part of a year?

Posted by: justinm at October 1, 2008 10:32 AM

I'm an owner, but I've always told people I thought renting was a very good idea. But,the rental inventory in Brooklyn is pretty bad compared to Manhattan. For renters who want to buy, I don't suggest waiting for things to come in 30%, they may not make it there.

Posted by: Paluka at October 1, 2008 10:33 AM

i disagree: Figures are from the most recent Case-Shiller report, released yesterday, and which includes figures through the end of July of this year (thus the most recent turmoil has not been reflected).

NY peaked at 216% above January 2000, whereas Phoenix and Miami were up 227% and 280% respectively (Miami experienced the greatest increase).

It is true that the volatility in those areas has been greater than what NY saw, but 600 - 800k for a 1 bedroom is simply not sustainable.

Posted by: j2 at October 1, 2008 10:35 AM

I HAZ--so there with you about being a human being. It feels like some people here are getting there jollies from other people's struggles. DOW, you in particular seem to take an almost sadistic glee in the notion of real estate devaluation. Where does this come from?

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 10:39 AM

How far could a 1-bedroom in Brooklyn Heights realistically drop? I am ready to buy my first place, somewhere in the 400K range. I have cash to buy in full and would like to stop feeling like I'm wasting money on rent each month. Any advice?

Posted by: fishermb at October 1, 2008 10:41 AM

I am not at all surprised about the bubble popping and was one of those criticizing people on this blog who lived in the fantasy world that NYC prices wouldn't come down (I grew up here and saw my family lose lots of money in late 80s real estate debacle) - but unfortunately bought one month before subprime crisis, so am feeling somewhat panicked. Just praying that hollywood is able to chug along ok - spouse works in movies and is main breadwinner. agghhhhhh.

There are so many things that will make Brooklyn's prices drop - besides Manhattan prices dropping which will create a huge outflux from Brooklyn- but also HUGE decline in city's tax revenue will mean cuts in everything - and cuts in subway service will make Brooklyn MUCH less attractive. Not to mention cuts in police force so crime will go up, and cuts in public schools so more people will flee to suburbs where property tax revenue streams are less vulnerable to downturns.

I would actually be so happy about all of this if I hadn't F*%&$!g bought a GOD*^%$&$*ed house right before the s*&^%! hit the fan. Porca miseria.

Posted by: gkw at October 1, 2008 10:42 AM

gkw---I am right there with you in being nervous about buying a house as the shit hits the fan, but I do think that you are imagining a very extreme worst case scenario above. Cuts in police force would be a measure of absolute last resort, as would cuts in subway service. Not saying things aren't going to be tough but I do believe you have spelled out a doomsday scenario that is unlikely to transpire.

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 10:45 AM

Sebb: Happy renter here. As you know, I sold last year and started renting. I have probably already gotten a discount of $100,000 on whatever property I will eventually buy. Why on Earth would I be bitter about making an extra $8,333 a month (completely tax free)? And in the meantime I have been sending much less cash out the door on my rent than I would on a mortgage for a comparable apartment.

I would guess I will shave another $200,000 of the price of my future home in the next 18 months or so.

le (happy renter) chacal

Posted by: lechacal at October 1, 2008 10:47 AM

I haz, you're exactly the kind of proud, caring and thoughtful poster to whom I was referring. Owners and renters are in this together and I also take no pleasure in watching anyone suffer in trying to find a home in which they can be happy, whether they rent or buy. I never understood why either group would wish harm on or disparage the other. Whatever works for you is your business.

Posted by: Biff Champion at October 1, 2008 10:50 AM

Wasder - clearly you haven't been following the news. There is NO WAY NYC will not be cutting all these services - Bloomberg has already asked all the agencies to come up with a plan to cut something like 3-5% of their budget, there was a front page article about subway service being cut - and this was all almost two weeks ago, before the real shit hit the real fan. They are predicting a job loss of 120,000 in the NYC area!!

Posted by: gkw at October 1, 2008 10:52 AM

Paluka-

" For renters who want to buy, I don't suggest waiting for things to come in 30%, they may not make it there."

Are you aware how many condos are about to be dumped on the streets?

30%? I'm thinking 40-50. Give it a year or two.

Posted by: Prodigal_Son at October 1, 2008 10:58 AM

While I think the Case Shiller data captures the overall trends, I think it's noteworthy that the index includes zero Brooklyn brownstones since they are generally mult-family and the index is for single family. I point that out since Brownstones are persumably the focus of this.

Curious to know what people are seeing the in the rental market right now. Inventory (vacancy) is very low right now, but have to think it's changing.

As an aside, before I bought my house in 2003, I looked at renting a Brownstone but found that there were hardly ever any for rent. Have people seen any change in this?

Posted by: Boerum Hill at October 1, 2008 11:05 AM

Sigh. I don't think there are that many "bitter renters." I'm a frustrated renter, looking at a potential closing in two weeks after the sellers dicked us around for months. We're trying to figure out whether to walk away now or go through with it.

Posted by: serpentor at October 1, 2008 11:15 AM

My wife and I both work in fields that have no connection at all to finance. But both of our companies have already started to make big cutbacks--freezing hiring, letting go of part time people, killing projects that are not 'critical,' and doing projects inhouse that we had planned on hiring outside vendors for. These changes have a major ripple through other industries that we use--so soon the impact will ripple across all fields.

While our jobs are totally safe--at least for the near future--my wife and I have gone into financial lockdown. We cancelled our winter trip and won't be buying the new couch we had planned on getting. (Yes, obviously the worst thing for the economy). So I find it hard to imagine that people will decide that now is the time to sign that 1 plus million dollar contract. Those who must buy now will, but the majority of people will decide to hang tight and see how things play out. Which will of course cause prices to drop dramatically.

Also, whoever thinks this sight is mostly renters is wack. It is 98% owners!

Posted by: shillstoner at October 1, 2008 11:27 AM

serpentor: Depends on a lot of things, like when you signed, what the neighborhood is, whether you bargained well, etc. But assuming your purchase is not unique (which it probably isn't), my advice would be as follows:

Multiply the price you are about to pay by 20%. Take that number and subtract from it the amount of your deposit. If the resulting number is positive, walk away and start saving again. You will live to buy another day. If it is negative, close.

It will hurt either way. There is no easy answer.

Posted by: lechacal at October 1, 2008 11:29 AM

"After this Bill gets passed tonight you will see the Bottom in 2009."

No you will not. That's the problem with this bill. It is futile. The top was created with NO lending standards. The bottom is being created WITH lending standards. Bill or no bill, the pool of qualified buyers will continue to drop significantly because of these stricter standards, Wall St layoffs and the 3-to-1 layoffs related to Wall St. Have you forgotton who dominates the NYC economy? Mark-to-model is done. Securitization fees are done. Wild bonuses are done.

Maybe a bottom on Main St in 2009 but not NYC. It will lag. At any rate, the process is on nobody's schedule.

BTW, rents will fall too. While you are waiting to buy, bottom feed on all these failing condo projects (or other rentals inevitably affected - inventory, inventory, inventory) for a sweet 2-year lease deal.

Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at October 1, 2008 11:30 AM

i don't think Sebb realizes that some people don't have 50k laying around for a down payment.

also the average renter does not pay $2700 (or anywhere close) a month on they apartment. They live in a multi bedroom apartment and split it. I pay 800 bucks a month because I share an apartment with friends. Thats what most people do.

Posted by: Santa at October 1, 2008 11:32 AM

serpentor, my understanding is that if you've signed a contract and are heading for a closing, it's very difficult to get out now. At a minimum, I believe you would lose your down payment. I'm not a real estate lawyer, so if any are out there, I would be interested to hear any other options one would have to get out of a closing if one experiences cold feet (barring a coop board interview fail and / or a failed inspection / failed financing if one could ever sign a contract these days contingent on inspection / financing, which I thought was almost impossible in NYC).

Posted by: Biff Champion at October 1, 2008 11:33 AM

sebb

why so silent since 9:36?

Posted by: Prodigal_Son at October 1, 2008 11:33 AM

"Take a look at the actual Case-Shiller data. January 2000 is the baseline and since then NY property prices have increased over 92%"

No, they've increased about 200% since the 90's. Look at the NYC Case-Shiller data. I keep saying this: NYC housing will bottom when this index approaches zero on a year-over-year basis (change from last year measured monthly). Study the data on the S&P site. This is exactly what set the last bottom (1990's) and the last top (2006). The direction right now is away from zero and towards a deepening negative. No bottom in sight.

Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at October 1, 2008 11:36 AM

I'm in the same boat as gkw. I had rented since 1992, and in 2003 an aunt died and left me 17k -- enough to make a dp on a 1 br on the UWS. We decided to buy (and we were in a rent stabilized apt at the time) b/c we were basically tired of renting and wanted to set up a home the way we wanted. And, frankly, we saw prices starting to rise beyond our incomes. In other words, rightly or wrongly, we saw a window that was about to close.

We sold the 1 br in Q1 2007, because we had our first child, wanted a second and needed more space. We made a killing, so we bought a 3 br in brooklyn. We did raise our monthly payments significantly, as we had no intention of selling. No doubt we've lost money since then, and if we had to sell today we'd take a big hit (we put down 45% cash, so we could pay off the mortgage if we needed to).

Basically, while we haven't lowered our standard of living, we've severely restricted our options until prices return to 2007 levels. That may take 5 years at least.

Obviously in hindsight we should have rented last year, but this was before the mortgage crisis hit, and no matter what anyone says here, prices were not going down at that point.

It's impossible to time the market. You may get lucky, as we were in 2003, but then again, you may not, as we were last year.

You renters who are saying, well, I've just made 100k and hope to make another 100k by sitting on the sidelines: What if you're wrong? What if credit loosens and a wave of frustrated buyers flood the streets?


Posted by: Bolder at October 1, 2008 11:38 AM

Thanks Biff. Hi Wasder (my teammate). I don't get the schadenfreude either. Last I checked, if the police force gets cut, it gets cut for us all, not just renters. If the F train stops running, it stops running for us all. As has been said, all boats rise and fall on the same wave. My boat is rented, but it'll sink just like all the others. No joy in watching the people who own their boats sink as I go down with them.

Anyhoo. I only weighed in because sebb's condescending tone has irritated me in the past, and I wanted to respond to it straight on. For myself, I'm keeping out of debt, saving what I can, hoping for the best, and signing a new lease when the time comes!

Posted by: I_haz_TWO_toilets at October 1, 2008 11:38 AM

The one thing I think protecting NYC right now is that the current economic crisis is a national one. It is affecting all cities, suburbs and rural areas. The last major crisis in NYC there were "better" alternatives for people who wanted to leave the city, and that just isn't the case right now. Young people still want to come here relative to other major cities, families are not interested in moving to the suburbs with higher property taxes, higher energy bills (home and vehicle), etc. Neither rural areas nor other economic centers in the country offer better job opportunities than NYC (even with the loss of jobs we will experience--nowhere else in the nation is constructively any better). So that's one thing that insulates NYC right now to some extent.

Also, regarding apartment prices ($400k for 1-bed, etc), these prices also will likely be more sustainable in NYC than elsewhere because of the sheer number of co-ops here relative to the rest of the nation. I tried to find an article citing data, the most recent I could find was this quote from this past April: "While the citywide ratio of co-ops to condos is about 85 percent to 15 percent, the rates in an area like Brooklyn Heights chart in at almost 95 percent to 5 percent, said Ivana Tagliamonte, a senior vice president with Halstead Property." (http://ny.therealdeal.com/articles/foreigners-crossing-pond-and-the-river-to-brooklyn)

People have been documenting their income and forking over 20+% down-payments to get mortgages for their Brooklyn apartments throughout the entirety of this run-up in prices. They aren't faking their income with no-doc loans, or over-leveraging their income, so fewer apartment owners in BK will have their heads under water. Yes, there may be trouble in some of the new condo developments, but that still does not take away the fact that all of these people bought co-ops that they have proven they CAN afford.

So anyway, I'm much less gloom and doom on NYC compared to everywhere else. I don't think it's reasonable to expect prices here to come down as much as in Vegas or Florida where there was purely speculative buying in stagnant economies that never had a real job-base and where no one actually had to document their income to get a mortgage.

Posted by: setancre at October 1, 2008 11:39 AM

"While I think the Case Shiller data captures the overall trends, I think it's noteworthy that the index includes zero Brooklyn brownstones since they are generally mult-family and the index is for single family."

The index for NYC went up 200%. Brownstones went up 200%. Related on the way up, related on the way down. There is no better data that is not rife with industry spin.

Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at October 1, 2008 11:41 AM

"What if you're wrong? What if credit loosens and a wave of frustrated buyers flood the streets?"

Then I'll have to move out of Brooklyn. But what if credit tightens further and prices three-quarter or halve themselves? Who in this thread would bet on the former?

Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at October 1, 2008 11:48 AM

"It's impossible to time the market."

Quite the contrary. Define timing as predicting. You can be wrong but it's better than taking a non-calculated wild guess and eenie-meenie-minie-mowing your decision and risk catching a falling guillotine.

That quote is so David Learah circa 2005. Then they turn around and say "there's no better time to buy than now".

Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at October 1, 2008 11:55 AM

"You renters who are saying, well, I've just made 100k and hope to make another 100k by sitting on the sidelines: What if you're wrong? What if credit loosens and a wave of frustrated buyers flood the streets?"

If that defines the risk I am taking, then I am happy to take it.

Buying real estate is so much riskier than people have thought over the past 10 years. Rising prices are like a novocaine shot directly to the risk receptors. Same happens with stocks. Here's something to illustrate the point: buying stocks right now is really not very risky at all. Prices are low. Sure, they might go down another 10%, but it is MUCH less risky to buy now than it was a year ago. No matter how many bubbles there are, and no matter how many crashes, humans expect a market's future to look like its immediate past.

In fact, I would say that buying real estate in Brooklyn right now is much, much riskier than buying into an S&P 500 index fund. This is particularly true on the assumption that the latter is not a leveraged bet like the former. Put $200k down on a $1m place that loses 20% in value and you are completely wiped out. Put $200k in the stock market and watch it go down another 20% and you have lost $20,000.

Posted by: lechacal at October 1, 2008 11:56 AM

I mean $40,000 of course.

Posted by: lechacal at October 1, 2008 11:58 AM

You can't live inside the S&P.

Posted by: 11217 at October 1, 2008 12:04 PM

11217: That's a classic and completely irrelevant argument. I can rent a home. I don't need to buy in order to have a roof over my head. DOW brough up David Lereah (one of my favorite real estate cheerleaders), who used to say that all the time. He wrote a really fantastic book in 2005, the title of which was exactly as follows:

"Are You Missing the Real Estate Boom?: Why Home Values and Other Real Estate Investments Will Climb Through the End of the Decade - And How to Profit From Them"

http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0385514344/ref=sib_dp_pop_fc?ie=UTF8&p=S001#reader-link

Posted by: lechacal at October 1, 2008 12:11 PM

two things:
1) the PS brownstone they were talking about was actually in CH or CG. not that it matters, but just to be clear...
2) I bought my home a year ago. It's my home. I love it. I plan on being there for a long time. So, I'm not terribly concerned with its value now, except, if I get it reappraised, can I get my taxes lowered? (really, I don't know.)

Posted by: new2hood at October 1, 2008 12:23 PM

I think people need to think about what economists call "the next best alternative" or opportunity cost.

A house in an asset, yes, but one that you live in. It therefore provides an additional benefit ... namely, not having to pay rent.

Even if my house NEVER appreciates in real terms, as long as I'm living in a big 'ol townhouse with a backyard for LESS that it would cost me to rent over the same period (after the mortgage tax break and including maintenance, etc.) I'm still AHEAD in terms of lifestyle and finance.

And ... say what you want ... but since I bought my house a few years ago, rents for a 3 bedroom apartment (not even a whole townhouse) have been waaaay higher than my "ownership costs".

Now, if rents for a "comparable" place in Park Slope or Manhattan even slip below this "break-even" point, then I'll worry but with 2 bedroom apartments renting for more than my PRE-TAX mortgage payment, I think all will be ok.

Even factoring in near-term losses on home equity, I don't think anyone will say that over 5 or more years they expect losses.

Posted by: Mr Joist at October 1, 2008 12:27 PM

I'm happy in my place also regardless of the value. I still pay about 300-500 bucks less per month than it would cost to rent a similar place. If anything I think PS will be even more interesting as more people who have wanted to live there will soon be able to afford it.

The beauty of NYC is the constant change. It certainly felt like it was turning into anytown USA, so I believe this situation will actually be a good thing for NY. All one has to do is look at the vibrancy of Buenos Aires to see how that city is coming back from economic collapse in 2001.

Maybe my dream of having late night shopping restaurants/shopping again in NYC will come true when small business owners realize they need to step it up to compete.

Maybe more people will enjoy life each day and stop watching American Idol if their life depended on it.

Maybe people will realize that we are all in this together and be nicer to each other.

Maybe more people will value relationships with one another, and less people will be lonely in this city.

Maybe the city that never sleeps will stop sleeping so darn much and get out there and party again.

I'm looking forward to the possibility of all these things a lot more than I ever did about a few extra bucks when I sold my apartment.

Posted by: 11217 at October 1, 2008 12:33 PM

gkw---as a news junkie I take exception to the notion that I haven't been following the news. I understand that the city is facing a budget crisis but my sense is that cuts that you have described would be a last resort measure that I have not seen anyone suggest yet.

DOW--you and I obviously have not always seen eye to eye on everything. But I am not attacking you to ask why I read so much glee from your analysis of the falling housing market. I am asking you a sincere question: do you have concern for the readers on this board who are concerned about precipitous drops in their property values? While this is not the only factor for whether to own a house (the main one being the enjoyment and fulfillment that comes with living in one's own home) I would like you to express a modicum of human respect for those people who are concerned about their long term financial futures.

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 12:36 PM

11217--bravo. I also hope that people will use this downturn as a way to put their money where their mouth is and get involved in their communities. There are things that everyone can do to make sure that Brooklyn remains a healthy, diverse, fulfilling place to live. I always appreciate your perspective on these matters so thanks for your post.

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 12:39 PM

setancre: well said. If the people on this Board would understand what happened in most of America with the Mortgage crisis, they would understand the big Difference In most of America and NYC. No one in Nyc that worked as a cashier at Met foods went to Wells Fargo and Pretended to make $300k with a No Doc loan. I believe Many ignorant Southerners and middle Americans are to Blame for this Mortgage mess. Let's get one thing straight on this board I believe prices will decrease but no more than 15% across most of the city. When you see these price drops from some of the Builders and think WOW prices are really falling around NYC You are actually being Fooled.
Understand this Builders Started with The Highest Asking prices and don't really care if they lower the price Hundreds Of thousands because they are still Making a huge profit off of the Sale. Look around the world NYC is the 22 Most expensive place on earth to Live . Tell me what place is Better than NYC. NONE

Posted by: sebb at October 1, 2008 12:43 PM

setancre:

A very persuasive argument. Thanks for sharing.


Posted by: Polemicist at October 1, 2008 12:45 PM

Prices are still going up You people are CLOWNS. Here you go
1) Statistics: Per Jonathan Miller, Brooklyn condo sales dropped 11.3 percent in the second quarter, from 778 to 690, according to Miller Samuel. Prices are still going up, but the average condo sales price increased just 4.9 percent from the previous quarter, compared to 8.6 percent fin the same quarter last year

Posted by: sebb at October 1, 2008 12:47 PM

Agreed setancre. Good analysis. Lets hope you are right to some extent.

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 12:48 PM

sebb, you're use of title case is fascinating and quite distinctive. Just saying...

wasder, 11217 and anyone else who is interested in the End of The World Party on October 16, email me at biffchampion at yahoo dot com.

Posted by: Biff Champion at October 1, 2008 12:53 PM

gkw, check out the Bloomberg interview in the current issue of NY Mag:

NY: Mayor Bloomberg has said that the city made a “mistake” during the seventies fiscal debacle by allowing quality-of-life services—the Police Department, schools, parks—to deteriorate.

MB: ...The lesson is, when you walk away from these investments during tough times, you walk away from your future—and we won’t do that.

http://nymag.com/anniversary/40th/50651/

Posted by: brownstoner at October 1, 2008 12:53 PM

"Yet the fools who are renters continue to bash NYC."

'Scuse me? I've been a renter all my life. so were my parents and most of my family- of all the moronic arguments sebb makes (and he's made quite a few) this false bitter renter/ happy homeowner is the most ludicrous. Did someone die and leave you the white knight defender of the realm?

I realize most people feel owning a house is the best thing to do. I simply don't want to. What value system were you raised with that said renter/bad, homeowner/good? I'm truly sorry for anyone who has that shallow a world view. (meaning you, sebb).


"Tell me what place is Better than NYC. NONE" Yeah, well- thanks for your opinion, because that's all it is. And I speak as a born and bred New Yorker who loves my city. It may shock the crap out of you to know that millions of people would not want to live here. If it works for you, fine. It's a free country but this fake comparative chart you're building in your head has about as much validity as Sarah Palin's foreign policy creds.

If anyone sounds like a bitter, frustrated New Yorker, sebb, it's most definitely you.

Posted by: bxgrl at October 1, 2008 12:56 PM

make that, "YOUR use of title case..." Seems my grammar has much room for improvement!

Posted by: Biff Champion at October 1, 2008 12:59 PM

brownstoner - seems unlikely that he will be able to uphold that promise given the current fiscal situation. However, if anyone can - it's Bloomberg. Praying he'll get a 3rd term.

Posted by: gkw at October 1, 2008 1:04 PM

sebb, the market doesn't hear you. What you say here is not going to affect the value of your property. There is no reason to be anything but honest here. None of us even has any idea who you are.

Posted by: lechacal at October 1, 2008 1:09 PM

11217:

Unfortunately, your sentiment doesn't have much to do with real estate or even human behavior in general.

It's a nice sentiment, don't get me wrong. I'm all about free ice cream, endless sunshine, a chicken in every pot, and a puppy on every lap. But I'm also a realist. New York City is not Buenos Aires. When food shortages become a reality and rolling blackouts not uncommon, you can expect serious civil unrest unknown there. It is likely before that happens, consumer goods and the luxuries of life will become out of reach for all but the well off. Without distractions, we will have some problems.

We really are at the precipice of a serious economic collapse, and I'm not confident we have the necessary civic virtue to overcome such an event, if it were to occur.

There is a sense of entitlement and exclusion that permeates our society that limits cooperation and breeds resentment. I try to highlight it with the NIMBY phenomenon, but also with the level of acceptance of identity politics and the balkanization of our neighborhoods. When the government ceases to have the ability to effectively deal with the coming crisis, the various insular groups of this city will become intolerant of outsiders.

Only the Soviet Union provides us with an acceptable modern analogy, given our similar economic situation, military encumbrances, and centralized control. There is a fabulous book on the subject that came out recently, I encourage everyone to read it:

http://www.amazon.com/Reinventing-Collapse-Example-American-Prospects/dp/0865716064/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1222881138&sr=8-1

Posted by: Polemicist at October 1, 2008 1:15 PM

Also, I don't know if everyone caught Robert Shiller's take on this mess from this past Sunday

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/26/AR2008092602838.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Also a good read, and quite relevant in light of all the Case-Shiller index talk.

Posted by: Polemicist at October 1, 2008 1:21 PM

Well just agreeing with even some of his points gives me a migraine, but there's much to what polemicist says. Don't know that I agree with the issue of serious social unrest though- certainly not the escape from NY scenario. My fear is that we love sticking with the status quo because our political system is so ponderous and so balkanized itself that most of them care more about retaining their seat than the good of the country.

Not only does our financial sector need an overhaul, we need to take a good long look at how we put people in office- or maybe the kind of people we put in office. If Mccain and Palin win, that will well prove my point. Garbage in, garbage out.

Posted by: bxgrl at October 1, 2008 1:23 PM

oh please Polemicist - you must be joking. Are you actually implying that our citizenry is more exclusive and entitled in our outlook than Argentines? Have you spent any time in Latin America? Americans have shown many times in our history that when bad things happen we have extraordinary reserves of civic virtue to call upon.

That being said - don't you think predictions of "rolling black outs and food shortages" are a bit extreme? You are really too much!

Posted by: gkw at October 1, 2008 1:25 PM

Well, not much to add here, except I think the bubble has popped but not yet deflated.

I just renewed my lease for another year. I didn't even argue with the (small) rent increase -- I could probably find a cheaper rental on the market now but after paying moving costs and going through the hassle of moving it wouldn't be worth it to me.

Things are unraveling faster than I thought (I thought it would be 2009 before all the investment banks were gone), but I still think it will be another year before things really hit NYC (when severance packages run out and people accept that Wall Street isn't hiring like it use to).

I hope we are not in for painful economic times in the general economy, but it looks like we are. My advice: keep cash and keep it FDIC insured. Worry about returns another year.

Posted by: northsloperenter at October 1, 2008 1:42 PM

lechacal & Biff Champion

I'm getting off topic so I'll just start a forum post.

Posted by: serpentor at October 1, 2008 1:58 PM

I may have missed it but I don't think that anyone has brought up that fact that at some point you stop paying a mortgage. Then you're free and clear (less taxes and general upkeep) to bank your money rather than paying rent.

Posted by: TownhouseLady at October 1, 2008 2:05 PM

"rolling blackouts and food shortages"....I heard that things are going to get so bad so fast that when The Road movie comes out they are going to classify it as non-fiction

Posted by: Paluka at October 1, 2008 2:09 PM

Sorry, you FINISH paying off your mortgage. Stopping paying will you into a heap of trouble!

Posted by: TownhouseLady at October 1, 2008 2:09 PM

"People have been documenting their income and forking over 20+% down-payments to get mortgages for their Brooklyn apartments throughout the entirety of this run-up in prices."

Yes, but I've also seen a heckuva lot of 10% down sponsor sales in the past few years. It gives one pause.

Posted by: SnarkSlope at October 1, 2008 2:24 PM

THL- oh I know there are many advantages to owning. I may be shooting myself in the foot, but I really have neither the resources nor the will to own a house. At least right now. And there are so many other expenses and responsibilities added to owning a house- believe me I have the utmost respect for homeowners who make that choice. I'm just objecting to the dichotomy that sebb has laid out and quite a few others have played into on brownstoner in the past.

(think you're in trouble if you stop paying your mortgage- try not paying your rent! :-)

Posted by: bxgrl at October 1, 2008 2:35 PM

As someone who both benefited from the real estate boom (we sold a few months ago) and is currently renting and planning to buy again soon, I can offer the following perspective. First, many people profited very handsomely from the recent boom and while I consider myself lucky to be among them, I also feel real outrage at the mess we're in, and the many less fortunate people who will just be screwed by the current financial situation. And, while we made a tidy profit from our real estate, we, like many (if not most) people we know, are still nervous about how this economy will affect us personally. Unlike the rogues who really made a huge pile in the boom (wall streeters socking away giant bonuses), we are still in a somewhat precarious financial position should we lose our jobs since we have not been making 6-7 figure salaries all these years.

Luckily, we are pretty frugal (we're currently renting a modest place, and while we need more space, we also don't need something fancy). We did not originally plan to sell before buying a bigger place for our growing family, but needing to move to a better school zone forced our hand, and given the negative economic indicators, it seemed a good gamble. That said, for reasons many have cited on this list, I'm not sure if NYC will really crash per se. And, even though on a purely selfish level, I'd love to get a great deal on a house, I also worry for the greater good (my own stake included) if NYC really takes a bath. A big real estate crash, and all the attendant ills, will not really benefit anyone. In the same way that, as much justifiable outrage as there is now about the 700billion bail-out, no one will benefit if we let our entire financial system collapse.

So, I see this moment as one that is decidedly mixed for me personally. I guess the ideal outcome, IMO, is a significant correction in the market, to make it more affordable to the many people who were priced out in the boom years - good, hard-working people who just don't pull in huge salaries but are involved members of their community - without pulling the rug out from the NYC tax base.

And of course, I'm still hoping we can get a deal on that house we're dreaming of, but as I've said many times, we're not waiting for a totally unrealistic price. We fully expect to pay significantly over 1mil for a decent, albeit small house in a good hood (i.e. PS, in a good school zone). But whereas prices for what we've been seeking have been hovering around 1.7+, we'd be thrilled to pay 1.2-3. Of course, this level of specificity is impossible to predict, but I'm simply saying that those who hope to buy a nice brownstone for a song might want to be careful for what they wish for. And lechacal, as to your point about overpaying for a home instead of stocks, for me, I still think that I will not mind overpaying somewhat (i.e. I won't pass up the perfect house just to "time the market" as long as the price is reasonable). I know how hard it is to find something you love, and if you really are going to stay in there for life, as we intend to, eventually that small overpayment may not matter. Provided, and this is the key point that too many people forgot these last few years, that you are not stretching beyond your means in the price you pay. As the buyer pool shrinks in this climate, sellers will have to price more realistically as those buyers that remain, like us, will refuse to stretch to pay absurd prices that indeed may be beyond their means.

Posted by: Miss Muffett at October 1, 2008 2:49 PM

Bxgrl....I think TL is referring to the fact that many people are finished paying for their home in 30 years or less. That's when the REAL benefits of home ownership come into play.

In 2035 when rents (at current levels) will be $10,000 a month for a 1 bedroom, I will be finished paying for my home and will have only taxes, maintenance, etc. to pay.

I don't want to be 65, retiring and on a fixed income and have to deal with moving, rent increases and all of which goes along with that. It would be fine if I were in rent control as many of our older population are these days, but that is no longer the case for most.

Buying a home means one thinks more about the future, I think. I'm happy to know that my golden years will be just a tad easier now that I am a homeowner. And that has absolutely nothing to do with resale value. It's my home.

I certainly understand the flip side, but most renters I know are NOT socking away that "extra cash" they are supposedly saving by not buying. Half of this country's population over 55 has less than 10,000 saved for retirement.

That is staggering and shocking.

Posted by: 11217 at October 1, 2008 2:53 PM

The bubble may have popped but the deflation hasn't even started.

Most of almost any market is psychology, and it is bad and going to get worse. And guess what it really wont matter all that much if you are in a "crappy" new condo; a "fancy" old Coop, or a beautifully restored Victorian brownstone - all are in the same market, all are affected by the same psychology , all have suffered price appreciation totally unjustified by sustainable economic conditions and ALL are coming way way down.

Trust me in 18mo->2yrs very few people will be criticizing renters for "throwing their money away"

It is entirely likely that NYC will will the same price deprecations as felt in places like Fla and CA - yes NYC has a much more "limited" supply and more inherent demand but NYC has also just lost its major industry for the foreseeable future.

Posted by: fsrg at October 1, 2008 3:03 PM

"most renters I know are NOT socking away that "extra cash" they are supposedly saving by not buying" --11217


yeah. that is the scary part. I'm amazed when I talk to my peers (early 30s, working but not lawyers or anything) and realize that most couldn't come up with anything beginning to resemble a down payment. I think there's a correlation between that and the way I'm always envying their travel and wardrobes and stylish home furnishings.

Posted by: serpentor at October 1, 2008 3:03 PM

As a renter, I'm able to sock away all that extra cash like mad. Its nice to be liquid and debt free in this economic climate. Also, keep in mind, there are plenty of good investments other than real estate to build a fat nest egg with.

I don't hate, though. Some of my best friends are home owners.

Posted by: Arsenal at October 1, 2008 3:13 PM

I totally understand Bxgrl and I think your feet will be fine ;).

It's just that I've been listening to all the back and forth in recent days (weeks? months?!?) of the advantages of renting vs. owning and owning vs. renting I didn't remember hearing anyone make this point.

We deliberately bought below what we could "afford" so we could set up and aggressive payment schedule and have 8 years before we retire to just bank our income. We got a traditional 30 yr. fixed but with the additional payments towards premium bi-weekly it's end up being an 18 yr. mortgage. Provided we are able to financially maintain the extra payments.

Posted by: TownhouseLady at October 1, 2008 3:14 PM

I am currently a brownstone seller, I may lower my price but not by much. Now if I was a developer with many 1 bedrooms and studios I would be nervous,

Posted by: billyboomer at October 1, 2008 3:15 PM

gkw:

Yes, I have spent time in Latin America. Most people are familiar with hardship on some level. They aren't going to riot because stores don't have bread for a day or two. They are used to public utilities not being available at all times as a general rule. They also have no problems with the police carrying submachine guns and using them to maintain order.

My point is merely that life has rarely been easy for people in Argentina. The tolerance for pain in this country and this city in particular is shocking low. Why do you think I loved making fun of those nutjobs in Carroll Gardens? The rest of the world laughs at us when people complain about buildings being 10 feet too tall. There are far more pressing problems in this world.

The primary issue everyone must realize is the current crisis ultimately is due to the onset of peak worldwide oil production. Unlimited credit expansion is predicated on continued economic production. Unfortunately, such production requires energy, which today means oil. Credit, by necessity, cannot continue to expand indefinitely until an alternative is found or we completely reorder society. There is no time to do either, thus at some point - credit expansion will stop and asset deflation will set in.

Part of the reason I so fervently support higher density development is there a chance, a slim one, that the urban nature of this city will make it the center of a new economic order in the future. We are the only place in this country that has 3rd world level energy usage, and it is the high density development and public transportation network that makes it possible.

There is no question energy distribution will falter when we no longer can borrow from foreign governments to buy oil. Food shortages will be a reality sooner than you think. Industrial agriculture has destroyed much of our farmland. Current farming techniques are dependent upon imported minerals like phosphorous and natural gas for fertilizer. The price of both of these necessities has tripled or worse just this year alone. We should have learned from the Soviets: collectivized farms don't work.


Posted by: Polemicist at October 1, 2008 3:17 PM

When we can no longer afford or are able borrow to buy oil - the price of oil will easily fall back to its 1998 level.....$11 a barrel

as for billyboomer - you might not lower your price but if you have to move you will and if your smart you want to lower your price and sell now, rather then waiting till you find yourself dumping along with everyone else who thought prices couldnt fall so much

Posted by: fsrg at October 1, 2008 3:35 PM

Polemicist: are you related to Che Guevara? Your rhetoric is somewhat Latin-populist but without the charisma.
Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
Are you high?

Posted by: sam at October 1, 2008 3:38 PM

"Why so serious?"

Posted by: Arsenal at October 1, 2008 3:39 PM

All this talk - with certainty - of the downward direction of real estate prices sounds a lot like the real estate agents and "experts" a few years back who stated that prices must go up.

No one here knows for sure and pontificating as if you do doesn't make your guessing any more convincing. Only time will tell. Everything else is a complete waste of time.

Posted by: 11233 at October 1, 2008 3:42 PM

11233--AMEN!

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 3:44 PM

Polemicist - maybe you should write an op-ed for WSJ since this is a theory that no one but you seems to espouse. Enlighten the world, please.

Posted by: gkw at October 1, 2008 3:45 PM

Sam: Do you even know who Che Guevara is? I directly criticized communism in my post, why would I support a homicidal communist lunatic?


fsrq:

Actually, by that point - no one will take US dollars to buy oil because they will have no value. They have oil. What do we have? Hollywood?

11233:

What is certain is value of real estate relative to other necessities like food and energy will likely return to historical norms. Current prices are fundamentally unsustainable for the reasons I mentioned - they are based on the flawed assumption credit and the productive economy can continue to grow ad infinitum, which it can't. We can't predict the nominal dollar amount due to manipulation of the currency, but we can say with certainty that fewer loaves of bread will buy a condo in the future than today.

Arsenal:

we live in serious times

Read the Hirsch Report. Anyone who read this when it came out in 2005 should have known the boom couldn't last.

http://www.acus.org/docs/051007-Hirsch_World_Oil_Production.pdf

Posted by: Polemicist at October 1, 2008 3:50 PM

miss muffett: not to single you out, but when people in your position say that this moment is "decidedly mixed" for you, it seems insincere and self-serving. i don't understand why you can't just say, "it was good for me" and leave it at that. as far as the housing market goes, you profited, a lot, and in a way that had nothing to do with skill or (from what i can tell) work. yes, it was luck, but it was still purely good for you. on the flip side, other people - those who bought more recently, will lose, a lot. for the most part, they were unlucky. and as for the economy as a whole, you are no worse, and no better off, than anyone else. so, not "decidedly mixed."

as such, the attempt to distinguish yourself from the wall street "rogues" with bonuses again comes off as self-serving. it's not like most wall streeters were the architects of the faulty system. most of them just sat, did what they were told, and cashed in those bonuses, just like you did when you sold your house. why does that make them "rogues" and somehow more deserving of suffering, or less deserving of their payday, than you?

you are decidedly ahead of the game. it's okay to admit it.

Posted by: i disagree at October 1, 2008 3:52 PM

lechacal: "You don't know who i am" You sound Like a NUT job. Who are you? The Son of Sam. Get A Hold on your Life.

Posted by: sebb at October 1, 2008 3:54 PM

"on the flip side, other people - those who bought more recently, will lose, a lot. for the most part, they were unlucky"


We are only unlucky if we have to sell. And I'd wager that 90% of homeowners in NYC did not buy to flip. It's such a process here to buy a property, that I believe many people bought to live in their homes.

I feel quite lucky, in fact.

Posted by: 11217 at October 1, 2008 3:56 PM

serpentor...

"yeah. that is the scary part. I'm amazed when I talk to my peers (early 30s, working but not lawyers or anything) and realize that most couldn't come up with anything beginning to resemble a down payment. I think there's a correlation between that and the way I'm always envying their travel and wardrobes and stylish home furnishings."

You just described me. Except I have a reliable, high paying job, ZERO debt- read: 0, pay next to nothing in rent and have PLENTY of cash in the bank. Oh yeah, and travel, nice wardrobe and stylish home furnishings, much of which I've recently bought at the Brooklyn Flea Market.

Down payment, I'm sitting on it, Thanks.

The only thing that could be a problem for me is if FDIC collapses. But I've got a few hundred grand in cash buried in my yard in case that happens.

Posted by: Prodigal_Son at October 1, 2008 3:56 PM

I wish we could get beyond who "deserves" to suffer. Very few people in the world deserve suffering.

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 3:56 PM

gkw

I gave you a nice link for a great book on this subject already. The Hirsch Report is generally considered one of the more authoritative papers on the subject. Many other books have been written.

Besides, the WSJ has little interest in report a truth, not a theory, that will have sudden, revolutionary implications for the future of mankind. Such revelations do little to inspire confidence in the Wall Street Casino.

Posted by: Polemicist at October 1, 2008 3:57 PM

Wasder-

Sorry, I think 1/2 this country's population -deserves- to suffer.

Posted by: Prodigal_Son at October 1, 2008 3:58 PM

Don't be silly. Hank Paulson deserves to suffer. HARD.

Posted by: Arsenal at October 1, 2008 3:58 PM

Polemicist:
Ha ha ha! you are high!

Posted by: sam at October 1, 2008 4:00 PM

Prodigal--which half?

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 4:07 PM

11217 - yes, right, thanks for the clarification. i meant unlucky in the financial sense that recent buyers will not likely profit in the same way over a similar time span as the miss muffetts of the world have.

wasder - i agree with you. that's my point, actually. contrasting one's relatively good position with that of "rogue" wall street bonus hogs seems pointlessly self-justifying, especially when so many people will lose so much.

Posted by: i disagree at October 1, 2008 4:28 PM

Polemicist...come on you are sounding like "The What" now....I agree that the U.S. is in for some bad times (frankly since the U.S. is the 'housing market' that the rest of the world is leveraged on...they're screwed too)

but we have a 14Trillion dollar a year GDP - which over 20% is pure industrial production, we are the 3rd largest producer of oil in the world (9M barrels a day!); we are the 2nd largest producer of natural gas in the world; we are one of the worlds largest producers of agricultural products; we export approximately 1.1 Trillion dollars of goods annually, we have a growing (mostly) literate population and one of the most advanced infrastructures in the world.

In the worst worst worst case scenario absent total war or horrific natural disaster, this country could (but unlikely) have brief periods of economic chaos (as in CC stop working, bank failures, riots, etc...) and even more persistent periods of relative deprivation (as in gas/electric shortages, reduced health care, etc...) but the idea that the U.S. is totally bankrupt, and will have to resort to a barter economy is loony, in fact the idea that the U.S. will cease to be one of the most powerful economies on earth in any of our lifetimes is almost laughable.

Posted by: fsrg at October 1, 2008 4:34 PM

Prices for two- and three-families are down significantly, about 20 percent, since January in Bushwick, where I live. Some properties seem to be selling quickly, while the really wrecked properties are lingering.

Anybody know if the scenerio for mortgages has changed in the last few days? Can you still get a loan with only 10 percent down? (Sounds like maybe no given the above comment about PMI insurance backing out.)

Posted by: mopar at October 1, 2008 4:49 PM

Prices in Hoboken are not being hit all that hard. A home near my home on the waterfront was put up and went into contract after 1 week. At ask... But our property values are not as bad as the ones in Brooklyn. Also a friend of mine sold his downtown brownstoner at a price better than what he bought it for in 2005. Not a big profit but a profit. If you bought a home with a good rental roll than you should be fine.

Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at October 1, 2008 4:54 PM

do you guys think I will be able to buy that brooklyn heights townhouse for around 600 k in a year or two....

Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at October 1, 2008 5:00 PM

sebb: Ease up there, old buddy. I just pointed out that no one knows who you are. The point is that this is an anonymous message board. There is no pride here, unless you have some issues with separating your Internet personality from real life. Relax man.

Posted by: lechacal at October 1, 2008 5:01 PM

do you guys think I will be able to buy that brooklyn heights townhouse for around 600 k in a year or two....

I just asked my magic 8 ball. It said "all signs point to no"

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 5:05 PM

I Disagree---I am with you on your overall estimation of the "deserves to suffer" issue, but I don't think Ms Muffett was being self serving. Seems to me she was just expressing a nervousness that we all feel no matter if we benefited from the inflated property values or not.

Prodigal Son--you sound like a smart, rational person. Which half of the country deserves to suffer in your opinion?

Posted by: wasder at October 1, 2008 5:12 PM

fsrq:

I'm sure the folks in the Supreme Soviet were saying the same thing in 1985 as the Afghan War was grinding down the will of the people.

I do hope you're right. Thanks for spending the time compiling those statistics.

Posted by: Polemicist at October 1, 2008 5:32 PM

"What is certain is value of real estate relative to other necessities like food and energy will likely return to historical norms."

- Polemicist

Forget that energy sources like oil, natural gas and coal are finite and food products supply is subject to finite variables like land to cultivate it and that such itmes are subject to global supply and demand. Let's concentrate on all the 19th C. brownstones in Brooklyn that you all hope will fall in price by 40% so you can buy them. Unless brownstone Brooklyn falls into some abyss, you all want a piece of the action. Guess what .... there is a finite supply. And as more people "discover" Brooklyn, the demand will only increase. Though I don't question that prices might decline in the very near term, your self-assured comments don't jibe with the reality on the ground.

Posted by: 11233 at October 1, 2008 5:48 PM

11233, I for one don't won't a brooklyn townhouse unless it is in cobble hill or the heights. But I will say this. The truth is that the housing market will continue to fall but not by another 40 percent. I would say another 10 to 20 percent from current prices. And that still leaves many unable to buy. But it also leaves the owners of alot brownstoners flat or a bit under or over on their homes. If you are smart and have cash as I do, then you will get a good deal, just not in the best locations for they will always attract buyers. So yea, my heights home is out of the question...

Posted by: HOBOKENROCKS at October 1, 2008 6:21 PM

bubble bubble toil and trouble
bankers fall
and defaults double.

Posted by: Inigo at October 1, 2008 6:53 PM

Hoboken: I can understand your POV, but your POV creates the very high prices for areas like Cobble Hill and Brooklyn Heights because you are not the only one looking to buy in those neighborhoods. You help to create the demand that keeps the prices high. IMHO those areas will not see a significant decrease because the second the price declines all that demand will jump on the limited supply.

Now if you were looking for a house in - I don't know - Cambria Heights in Queens, you would be able to get a big house for a low price because the demand for a house in that neighborhood is much lower. (In fact, I think most of the NYC house price declines come from neighborhoods in southeast Queens, where defaults and supply are high but demand is low.)

If you can get a brownstone in your desired neighborhood for a great price, good for you. I just don't see that happening.

Posted by: 11233 at October 1, 2008 7:04 PM

My, my, my! We all did a LOT of TYPING today! Wow!

Anyway, I haven't always agreed with Polemistisis but you guys were a bit to rough on him today. Some of the ideas he put out there were quite valid. One wag commenting that Polemistisis should write a WSJ editorial since these ideas were so out-there...well, you showed a good deal of ignorance today. So lay off Mr. P. Sure, he's wrong about NYC being the best place to be during the energy crisis but hey, his heart's in the right place, Mr. P.'s heart is.

Effesaregee,
Get with the program. We're addicted to fossil fuels. All the great stats you spouted off currently can only be sustained with the present level of oil, coal and gas use. Maybe, a huge amount of oil is still extracted in and around the US...BUT, we only produce a small fraction of what we use.

Prodigiously Sung was awfully full of himself today. Was I the only one who noticed? I assume he's single or something like that.

BG

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 1, 2008 7:13 PM

BrooklynGreene-

I'm happily married, going on 20 years.

Full of myself? It comes from all the attention I get from people like you. Thanksfor playing...

Posted by: Prodigal_Son at October 1, 2008 7:41 PM

Sorry for any misunderstandings, Prodigal Son. I was actually referring to Prodigiously Sung's comments. Yes, Prodigiously Sung really sounded full of himself in one, if not more, of his comments today. Oh, well. Doesn't do much for me but one of the comments jumped out as being a bit too much and I had to say something. Why bother. Everyone's dropping this thread anyway...end of the day...

Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 1, 2008 8:25 PM

Prodigiously Sung?

I can't find this handle in this thread...

Posted by: Prodigal_Son at October 1, 2008 8:29 PM

i blame suze orman for this entire housing meltdown

Posted by: gemini10 at October 1, 2008 8:38 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions