« 620 10th Street Hits the Market House of the Day: 206 208 Hancock Street »
October 28, 2008
Condo of the Day: 145 Park Place, #2B

The owners of this two-bed, two-bath condo at 145 Park Place are selling the place they've owned since early 2007, but it's not to leave the building. They're buying a bigger place upstairs. In addition to the location, this place has a good layout going for it. The price of $925,000, however, seems pretty aggressive, especially since they only paid $695,960 for it a year and a half ago. Anyone have any general comments about this building?
145 Park Place, 2B [FSBO] GMAP P*Shark
Condos of the Day: Park Place Doubleshot [Brownstoner]
Lots of Price Cutting at the Park Place Condominium [Brownstoner]
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/6906
Comments
I like the brick wall in the garden. thats my comment.
Posted by: dittoburg at October 28, 2008 12:49 PM
975k is way too much in this market. Even with tax abatement & given sq footage (1016) of apt, this place should be on the market for approximately $745,000
Posted by: PropJoe at October 28, 2008 12:50 PM
drearsville. crazy price.
Posted by: gkw at October 28, 2008 12:52 PM
I like the reflective silver balls on both sides of the bed. That's my comment.
Posted by: Biff Champion at October 28, 2008 12:52 PM
A unit that has 1860sf in the same building is asking $975k, so $925k for this unit seems laughable.
Posted by: SnarkSlope at October 28, 2008 12:53 PM
I've been in the building, great location, decent apartments if you are into that modern look. But dare I say, they may have to come down 100-200k on the price.
Posted by: Delilah at October 28, 2008 12:56 PM
A balcony overlooking the 20-hour/day cacophony of Flatbush Avenue. Yikes.
Posted by: Fjorder at October 28, 2008 12:57 PM
Price is such a joke. Assuming no money down (to make it an apples-to-apples comparison), you are looking at approx. $7,500 / month for this place, including mortgage, taxes and common charges. With tax benies, that comes down, but still would be more than $5k/month. How much would it rent for? Maybe $3,500 this summer. $3,200 this winter.
Posted by: aishling at October 28, 2008 1:11 PM
Laughable. A couple of morons.
Posted by: Yllebdael at October 28, 2008 1:20 PM
Their time machine seems to be stuck in 2007.
Not a good selling strategy to let it be known that they are buying a bigger unit in the same building. Time constraints will be involved, and they've shown their cards.
750K at most.
Posted by: buttermilk channel at October 28, 2008 1:22 PM
I agree with Fjorder: close to $1mil to live on the edge of Flatbush?!? No thanks!
Posted by: BrooklynButler at October 28, 2008 1:44 PM
Totally ridiculous. They'd be lucky to walk away with any profit from their initial purchase. Overpricing like this can backfire bigtime.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at October 28, 2008 2:01 PM
How much was initial purchase price? They should ask only 25k more than that given no broker commission.
Posted by: PropJoe at October 28, 2008 2:12 PM
I personally dislike this building enormously. I know others feel differently. The entrance on Park Place feels cold and isolated, and I really don't like being that close to (on top of) Flatbush. The apartments feel too angular and steel. It has all of the negatives I associate with modernism without any of the openness and flow that sometimes comes with buildings of that ilk.
That being said, I know some people like the building just fine. And it does have great subway access. But regardless of your feelings on the building, this place is simply not worth a single red cent more than these people paid in 2007. Top price for this place? $695,960. Full stop. Maybe some idiot will pay more, who knows. But I would be surprised.
Posted by: lechacal at October 28, 2008 2:35 PM
i know some people in a place down the street facing flatbush that is almost twice the size thats renting for 4k. However the building isnt as nice that is a huge difference.
Posted by: Santa at October 28, 2008 2:45 PM
I was at this apartment on Sunday for the open house. I saw a flier and *had* to see what they thought was worth the high price.
I was pleasantly surprised. It's a doorman building with huge courtyard and gorgeous roof deck. There's a parking garage and it's less than half a block from the Q/B.
The couple who owns the apt did a lot of work in it. None of the new units in the building came with overhead lighting, but they had recessed lighting put in every room. They had some custom-made built-ins done too. It's gorgeous with a wonderful layout. I was surprised how quiet it was, too.
I don't know if they'll get asking for it, but they'll get a profit, for sure. The guy said they actually went into contract on it about 3 years ago, just as construction began. So it's not been a year and a half. It's been three years.
Nice apartment on a nice street in a nice neighborhood.
Let the haters hate.
Posted by: tiefighter at October 28, 2008 2:58 PM
I'm sure it's a nice enough apartment but no way is it going for that price in this market.
It really doesnt matter what they paid or when -- it definitely isn't worth that much now.
I agree that it was very silly for the sellers to mention that they are in the process of buying another place.
In other words, they telegraphed their urgency to move this place. So bid low and make their problem your opportunity!
Posted by: ontheparkway at October 28, 2008 3:24 PM
I like this building fine from the outside and the apartment looks good from the pix but charging anything more than $800/SF is a bit optimistic.
Posted by: FatLenny at October 28, 2008 3:28 PM
Who said they're having a problem with buying another unit in the building? They don't exactly seem rushed to sell if they're asking $800/sq ft. If they bought it that long ago, the can probably profit off of renting it out until the market bounces back.
Pay near asking now, or more than asking a year from now.
There are other new 2 bedroom units in that building for sale at higher prices with crappy layouts, no light and tons of street noise on the Flatbush side. I think this is the only apartment left on the Park Place side of the building. Everyone flaming on this isn't looking to buy a place. I hope this apartment goes for 7 figures just so I can see all the pissed off comments!
Posted by: tiefighter at October 28, 2008 3:51 PM
Whatever, tiefighter. Since this is the first and only thread you've chosen to comment upon, your shilling is rather suspect.
Posted by: SnarkSlope at October 28, 2008 3:57 PM
Do they even have the tax abatement yet? Last time I looked at this building (which was about 6 months ago) although almost fully occupied, they had not yet secured the tax abatement and so the taxes were through the roof (compared with other new constructions). Isn't the doorman only part-time? This price is really high, but I do like the building other than the flaws I identified.
Posted by: JENNYFROMTHEBLOCK at October 28, 2008 4:03 PM
And you, SnarkSlope, have never posted a positive comment in your life.
Posted by: tiefighter at October 28, 2008 4:06 PM
I'll congratulate them if they get 7 figures. It would be a great vote of confidence from the market.
Won't happen though.
If you love this place, why buy when you could rent something as nice for WAY LESS. . .
Unless you think the market is just going to zoom up in the next coupla years. . .
Posted by: ontheparkway at October 28, 2008 4:15 PM
"And you, SnarkSlope, have never posted a positive comment in your life."
I'm not sure about that, but every one of his posts is positively hilarious.
Posted by: Biff Champion at October 28, 2008 4:17 PM
"And you, SnarkSlope, have never posted a positive comment in your life."
Not true, but if it makes you feel better to believe that, then follow your bliss.
Posted by: SnarkSlope at October 28, 2008 4:19 PM
Ok, gotta defend Snark....just because.
Posted by: bayridgegirl at October 28, 2008 4:25 PM
Snark Slope is most definitely funny. And Tiefighter, you are an obvious shill. You think we all just fell off the turnip truck?
Posted by: Fjorder at October 28, 2008 4:28 PM
I didn't post one comment about this apartment, cause it's boring indeed, overpriced, overhyped.
Nothing spectacular, nothing to Wow over.
Posted by: bayridgegirl at October 28, 2008 4:29 PM
i live near the place so im pretty familiar with the area and this is certainly not "prime park slope." Are you kidding me?, this condo is on flatbush ave, not PPW, 8th ave, or 7th ave. And trust me im in love with the area, especially being so close to the park and 4 subway lines. its a great apartment in a great location and it should get between 700-750k. 925 is just ridiculous and there are certainly no comps in the area at that price point. Maybe a 2R at meier's building costs as much, but that place is on the park, not on flatbush. Regardless, i wouldnt want either and im sure one could easily find a great 2 BR in the immediate area for between 650-700.
Posted by: bktycoon at October 28, 2008 4:33 PM
I'll let Streeteasy do the snarking:
"47 previous sales listings: $737 per ft² (avg)"
This unit is asking $910/sf. The comps have spoken, and they appear to be saying, "Put down the crack pipe."
Posted by: SnarkSlope at October 28, 2008 4:35 PM
Hey Everyone,
I'll do my own shilling, thank you very much. This is one of the owners of the Brownstoner Condo Of The Day. Tiefighter, if you come back to another one of our open houses, I'll give you some cookies.
As for all the name callers on here - you're hilarious.
I figured there'd be lots of comments and part of this is a little toe-dipping in to the water.
We live in a beautiful building with a 3/4-time door man. No one mans the desk from Midnight to morning. We have a live-in super. We have a garage. We have a roof deck and a courtyard. The neighbors are amazingly cool.
We closed on the apartment almost 2 years ago (February 2009 will be our 2-year anniversary.) but went in to contract on the place a year+ before that and endured the delays in construction.
We've sunk some smart money in to the apartment since then, as tiefighter pointed out. I had similar conversations with everyone who came to the open house this weekend, so I feel like a broken record.
We also put on the ad that we're buying a new place in the building not because we're in a hurry to sell our current unit, but because we want to reassure buyers that we're selling so soon after closing for a good reason.
Show me a 2-bedroom apartment over a thousand square feet, in a new building, with a door man, parking garage, roof deck, court yard, live-in super, amazing neighbors and such an amazingly convenient location on a quiet, tree-lined street. Please.
Putting the apartment on the market this close to the election and holidays is a good way for us to gauge interest.
Brownstoner is a great way to test the marketplace and you all seem to know your way around the real estate landscape. I welcome your input, folks.
Posted by: ParkPlaceOwner at October 28, 2008 5:47 PM
The apartment looks large and comfortable. Good luck to the owners! The location is pretty good, you have to admit. There is lots of shopping not far away.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 28, 2008 6:15 PM
Are you guys on crack? No, not the person listing the unit, those of you commenting. First off, this is just an initial asking price and when you look at recent sales in the building it isn't that far off. I'm familiar with the building and it's clear that this unit has some features the other units in the building don't have. And looking at the price they paid is totally irrelevant; if you know the building you'd understand what happened here – they signed during conversion and they took a huge risk that the project would fail or the units wouldn't be as advertised and because of all of that risk they paid below market at the time. You should walk into the unit before posting ridiculous comments about what it's worth. If you were so good that you could calculate exact market values without seeing the actual unit then you'd be making money buying properties and not spending your day posting garbage comments on this site… mortgage rates are at historic lows so if you can afford it, it makes sense to take a look and try to make a deal.
Posted by: DKBK at October 28, 2008 6:16 PM
Hey ParkPlaceOwner- Good Luck. If you are new to the open house thing, be prepared for people to act really interested and even act like they are going to bid and then to never hear from them again. And don't take comments about your apartment too personal cause so called buyers pick out the most goofy things to comment on, much like the comments you see here on Brownstoner. I have seen a drop off in traffic on my property. Now I am preparing to have my house on the market for the next year and would be surprised if it sells in the next 6 months...
Posted by: billyboomer at October 28, 2008 6:56 PM
although I loathe the ignorant renter rant from the likes of lechal or however you spell his username, I agree that this ask is too high. As an owner of two newly constructed pieces of NYC RE, I wish this ask is what would be fetched, but it won't. It's great unit though and contrary to what the renter drech on this site will tell you, it will sell. I also like the brownstoner pub idea. No pub is bad pub especially since bad pub is all you'll really receive on this site and others like it.
Reducing blows, but you can help offset. Negotiate that the purchaser pays the TT's and your ESQ fees at closing. These two costs, at your price point, represent a 12-15 k net in your favor.
Posted by: k91 at October 28, 2008 7:00 PM
i looked very very hard at this building when it was pre-construction, and in the end, found it to be too expensive for the space, and the only apts that I liked were flatbush side which i very unappealing, so i agree with most of the posters about the price.
however, in the seller's defense, i can imagine that they did probably put way more into to it then you all are taking into consideration. most new condos don't even have bathroom hardware. we did substantial built-ins and decorating ourselves, so i understand that it's both time consuming and costs money.
they should factor in the money they invested in the place in the sales price, and the buyers will benefit from the move in condition.
Posted by: wine lover at October 28, 2008 8:32 PM
ParkPlaceOwner, good for you for coming on to this site and offering your rebuttal. Bravo.
As I mentioned earlier, I happen to have a very personal dislike for this building, but obviously others have different views. For what it's worth, you do not live on a "quiet tree lined street." You live between Flatbush Avenue and a stretch of Park Place that hardly qualifies as a quiet tree lines street by virtue of its proximity to the 7th Ave/Park Place/Flatbush cluster.
I have absolutely no personal stake in your success or failure here. So good for you if you get your asking price. But my frank opinion -- as someone who is very familiar with a lot of current listings in the Slope -- is that you reached much too high with your asking price.
Most owners think their property is worth more than it is. It is the nature of ownership. A good realtor will temper those expectations with sober advice about what the market will actually bear. My humble view is that you never got that sober advice.
To be very clear, 2007 and the first half of 2008 were the top of the market. We have hit the top and are falling, and in my view will be falling for some time to come (I sold last year and started renting, so my money is right where my mouth is on this). You took the tippity-top of the market price for your apartment and then added some. When all is said and done, I think you will find yourself accepting a price at a discount to the top of the market (i.e., something in the neighborhood of what you initially paid for the apartment).
Again, I don't know you at all and have no personal stake in your success or failure, so if you can do better than I predict than good for you. But you might want to be prepared for an adjustment to your expectations.
Posted by: lechacal at October 28, 2008 8:32 PM
This apartment is unrealistically and absurdly overpriced. As pointed out, bought at the top. Only downhill from here.
Brownstoner, please check back in six months on this one.
Posted by: buttermilk channel at October 28, 2008 9:53 PM
I think lechacal nailed it. ParkPlace owner, I also salute you for coming on here which must be a hard thing to do when the comments can get so nasty. You sound like a nice person, and I'm sure you really believe that you are doing the right thing. And if you get your price, or close to it, then more power to you. But in this market, overpricing - especially as aggressively as you seem to have done - can be very risky. You do not want a property to linger in this market. Did you have your place appraised before you put it on the market? When we sold, we had many, many brokers give us a price to make sure we were on target.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at October 28, 2008 11:06 PM
billyboomer, I found your post interesting because I am in active search mode and go to open houses pretty regularly. I have been to enough to see some pretty consistent and annoying behavior by the lookers. Particularly common are the people who make sneering comments about a property that are clearly meant to be heard by the realtor, as if that is going to make the price drop or convince someone to accept a lowball offer. I actually have sort of a "looker code" for myself. I am always very respectful and never make sneering comments. I recognize that realtors wants frank and open feedback from the lookers, and I always offer that when I have the chance. If I think the price is higher than market (regardless of my view of the direction of the market), I say so. If there is something in particular that takes a property out of consideration for me, I will tell the realtor very frankly what it is (and not in a haggling kind of way).
At the end of the day, my decision is binary. I either bid or I don't. And after looking quite a lot of properties in the past 6 months or so I have bid on exactly zero (though I have come close a couple of times). There is simply no point in walking around open houses and trying to make realtors and/or owners feel bad. Market prices will come down, and then I'll buy. In the meantime I have nothing but time and patience.
Posted by: lechacal at October 28, 2008 11:29 PM
Hey ParkPlaceOwner,
I live on the other side of Flatbush from you, and I can your building from my apartment (NOTE: This is NOT a reference to Sarah Palin, okay?!?). Glad you enjoy the neighborhood.
See ya on the Q.....
Posted by: phrooch at October 29, 2008 12:17 AM
You should list it with corcoran so you have an excuse for justifying the 925 asking price and you could blame it on your mouth breathing realtor, as a fsbo you should be asking 750 tops.
Posted by: Xander Crews at October 29, 2008 12:33 AM
Lechal,
You say you sold last year. I am curious about your details, specifically your hold period and in deciding to rent, how much cheaper (after tax) you are saving doing so.
Posted by: k91 at October 29, 2008 10:44 AM
k91, as someone who also sold and is now renting, it's impossible to answer your questions definitely re: how much one saves by doing so. That said, several properties we were interested in wound up getting big price cuts (we're talking over 100K) so even if we spend quite a bit on rent (though when we were looking, we found several good options for rents that were very reasonable and I'm noticing rents are softening a bit now too), we can still come out well ahead by buying a home 6 months-2 years from now for a price that is significantly less than we would have paid 6 months ago. Like lechacal, we are in active mode, looking all the time, so maybe we'll buy something next week if we fall in love and the price seems reasonable. There are a few sellers out there who are starting to price more realistically - but alas, they for now are in the minority as most sellers still are coming out of the gate at high prices, hoping they'll do OK, only to find their places lingering and eventually forced to take big price cuts.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at October 30, 2008 10:13 PM
I live in 145 Park Place and in the same type of unit, i.e. the same exact floor plan as Apt.2B. There are a lot of inaccurate comments on this discussion thread. First off, this apartment is on the Park Place side of the building and does not face Flatbush Avenue and it is not noisy. The picture above is not what the Park Place side of the building looks like at all as many of you know. Also, the layout for this unit is pretty traditional, it's not one of the units with angular rooms. If you look at the floor plan it is two squarish bedrooms and a rectangular living room between them, which is nice because if you use the smaller BR as a guest room they are not right next to you and their bathroom is right there. Virtually all the units on this side of the building sold very quickly and I barely able to negotiate the price on my unit.
Also, this building has great neighbors, and an active condo board that holds open resident meetings. The super lives on the first floor and is always around and the doormen are professional. The building is working on a lot of other things including permanent storage space for residents. I would encourage people to attend the open house and visit the building and speak to any residents they encounter.
Posted by: brooklynboyparkplace at October 31, 2008 11:38 AM
Miss muffet,
On the contrary, it's always east to see how much you are saving vs losing in a rent or own analysis. By the sound of your post, it seems your probably losing money renting vs owning. Sure in two years?! You could negotiate lower and save in the future but that's a Gamble plus what you save then And if there's any time I'd rather be saving owning vs renting, plus building equity instead of losing my profit in stocks or making a neglligle (and soon to be even more negligible with the fed continuing to dillute your savings rate) rate in a cash or cash equiv, it's right now.
The gist of it is is that re rationale to sell one two years ago was to cash out at the top and dump your profit into another asset class. Turns out what people thought was a great asset class that could return you roughly 7-10% is now a -25 to -40% BOMB. For anyone to have cashed out on this rationale (and not because they had to for some other reason) is losing and when they do decide to hop back in, they will have either a net loss or maybe, maybe be even.
Of course, if your numbers reflect differently, of be curious to hear. I know my numbers are slanted about 3-4k/year in favor of owning vs renting.
Posted by: k91 at November 1, 2008 5:09 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.