« Tuesday Links More Tickets for Stoop Drinkers »
September 16, 2008
More Troubles with Teens

Last week, we reported on an incident at the Court Street Barnes & Noble, in which a band of teens had an altercation with a manager and one eventually socked the guy. A similar problem seemed to happen yesterday, according to this note from Park Slope Parents: "All of 5th Street between 6/7 Aves is taped off tonight. According to the policeman: 'Stabbing' 'After School' 'Yes, it was students.' He is not allowed to confirm if it was a fatality, but given all the investigation still going on at 8pm, I fear the worst. I have walked through the groups of teenagers on 7th Ave at 3pm almost every day last year and often this year and while they are often rowdy and often oblivious to anyone else on the street, those same students can also be very respectful and polite. It is scary and sad and yet another issue we should all be aware of and talking about." Meanwhile, another group of Brooklyn teens was arrested for attacking another youth. Well, let's talk about it, then. Thoughts?
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/6278
Comments
This is 2008 we should Put Cameras on every single block in NYC. Crime will go away. Plain and Simple.
Posted by: sebb at September 16, 2008 9:18 AM
Welcome to Brooklyn.......
Posted by: eastriver at September 16, 2008 9:30 AM
a certain amount of rowdiness is just normal hormonal stuff; beyond that, it's called bad parenting.
Posted by: Whoops Johnny at September 16, 2008 10:04 AM
eastriver, even I'm thinking your post was overly glib given the subject of an after school (possibly fatal) stabbing of a student.
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 16, 2008 10:07 AM
I appreciate my few rights of privacy still left. Cameras are not the right choice. A camera can't freeze bullets or stop knifes.
Eastriver does make a point. These things happen...sucks.
Posted by: DizzyNYC at September 16, 2008 10:17 AM
"These things happen...sucks. "
DizzyNYC, I wonder if that would be your reaction if it happened to someone close to you, like your child.
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 16, 2008 10:19 AM
The cameras would be a huge deterrent. London is the test case for that. Is that the best remedy? Not sure.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at September 16, 2008 10:25 AM
I don't know what good it does to have a running litany of these stories. It just reinforces negative stereotypes, and unfairly makes it look like the majority of kids out there are predators. That is just not the case. The good kids far outweigh the bad.
For those who have become little hoodlums, what do we expect? Frankly, far too many parents have left the care of their children to others - the schools, their kids' peers, or a computer or gaming screen. Respect is not taught, not respect for others, property, authority, or respect for themselves. There are no consequences for anything, until the cuffs go on, and then regret. Not for the deed, but for getting caught. This is across the board - across racial and economic lines.
I know I sound like my grandmother, but it really does all come down to "how you was raised up". I find snotty rich kids to be as rude and uncaring as attitudinal poor kids. I don't know what can be done, because I think it means a national return to "values", and that has become a right wing, political hot button that has lost all of its real meaning. But the only way people truly change is inside. We all need to re-learn how to care about people. All else will follow.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at September 16, 2008 10:27 AM
I miss the summer. There was none of this going on while school was out.
Posted by: Dora Chica at September 16, 2008 10:36 AM
with all respect, MM, this post is not about snotty, rude and uncaring kids. this post is about violence, actual physical violence that may be killing people, is at least injuring them and is making them scared to walk the streets. i don't think these posts are unfair at all - readers should be mature enough not to assume that a majority of kids are predators.
Re-learning "how to care" sounds really nice, but it's too late for these kids. I'm all for deterrence (cameras, extra police presence, after school programs, whatever actually works) and getting those we do convict (or whatever we call it for juveniles) off the streets and into some kind of environment where they learn some discipline.
Posted by: i disagree at September 16, 2008 10:44 AM
Morris-
" I find snotty rich kids to be as rude and uncaring as attitudinal poor kids."
So do I. Usually the snotty rich kids don't carry weapons.
I say imprison the parents.
Seriously...
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at September 16, 2008 10:49 AM
Bad parenting, maybe - but snotty, self entitled rich kids don't typically stab each other.
I'll refrain from using the "R" word - and attribute these incidents to a combonation of bad parenting and the family's socio-economic status.
Is there ways to prevent these crimes amongst kids that are so far gone that that would consider killing another human being? If the parents don't care, who should?
Posted by: A Guest at September 16, 2008 11:18 AM
"Bad parenting, maybe - but snotty, self entitled rich kids don't typically stab each other.
I'll refrain from using the "R" word - and attribute these incidents to a combonation of bad parenting and the family's socio-economic status."
A Guest, maybe I'm missing something, but where in the story above does it mention anything about the kids' socio-economic status? Or are you assuming?
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 16, 2008 11:22 AM
MM we truly respect your input to this blog and will say you are clearly one of the more informed & reasonable voices here. However we completely disagree with your assertion "I don't know what good it does to have a running litany of these stories. It just reinforces negative stereotypes, and unfairly makes it look like the majority of kids out there are predators". As pointed out above this is a significant issue because someones life may be @ stake and the frequency of such maladaptive behavior appears to be on the rise.
Also an honest question do you really think there is some sort of a class issue here? We don't get it from the OP but your statement seems to imply so... "I find snotty rich kids to be as rude and uncaring as attitudinal poor kids".
Posted by: pierre de taille at September 16, 2008 11:23 AM
I disagree, I find that on a blog like this, story after story of youth violence has no point other than to toss gas on the fire, igniting class and race issues that go nowhere but downhill. If all anyone can take from my post is that I don't approve of snotty rich kids, then you've totally missed my point.
I also am realistic enough to know that "learning how to care" sounds airy fairy and useless. Of course we need deterrence, punishment, and prevention. But how about changing hearts and minds so that less people need to be punished? I don't claim to know how to effectively do that, but that part of the plan certainly needs to be addressed, not just simply dismissed.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at September 16, 2008 11:25 AM
"...igniting class and race issues ...If all anyone can take from my post is that I don't approve of snotty rich kids, then you've totally missed my point."
Montrose, I agree with pierre on this one; where is class or race mentioned in the story?
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 16, 2008 11:28 AM
I was assuming based on the article linked about the Staten Island attack. It said they were from Livonia Ave in Brooklyn - which I associate with East New York, which I understand as having its fair share of poverty.
Also generally speaking
Posted by: A Guest at September 16, 2008 11:28 AM
Oh come on Biff. I feel for the kid who was stabbed and for his family. I really do, but don't you find the comment "..yet another issue we should all be aware of" remotely funnny? I mean seriously people welcome to Brooklyn. Our public school kids are out control. Street crime is a fact of life. This isn't a new issue. How can you not be aware of this?
btw, calling someone glib post the Cruise/Lauer interview takes guts. Maybe you have some Brooklyn in ya.
Posted by: eastriver at September 16, 2008 11:30 AM
"Frankly, far too many parents have left the care of their children to others - the schools, their kids' peers, or a computer or gaming screen. Respect is not taught, not respect for others, property, authority, or respect for themselves. There are no consequences for anything, until the cuffs go on, and then regret. Not for the deed, but for getting caught."
Montrose -- well put.
I think the value of increased publicity for these stories is to highlight the very problem you identify.
Maybe if more parents of young children heard more stories more often about problems going on with older children, it would give at least some of them reason to reconsider the values they are teaching their children.
Some people won't believe a problem exists unless they are repeatedly reminded of it.
Posted by: northsloperenter at September 16, 2008 11:58 AM
i didn't totally miss your point. you're distracting from your point by comparing what these teens are doing with snotty rich kids. it's not comparable, even remotely, and the fiction that it is comparable is just one tiny more piece of justification that these teens, whoever they are, and their parents don't need.
as for race/class, the fact is you don't know how rich or poor the kids discussed in this article are. and you're the only poster here who's assuming that you do, and opining on it.
eastriver - the comment about awareness was from the original posting on park slope parents. it was undoubtedly targeted toward parents of kids at the school and/or with kids in neighborhood schools. do you really not get why they need specific awareness of these incidents?
Posted by: i disagree at September 16, 2008 12:01 PM
I don't see why people are jumping all over Montrose for adding context to the discussion and being brave enough to talk about the 800 pound gorilla in the room. there's a long history on brownstoner of trying to tiptoe around the issue and far too often racism plays into all of this. I'm not saying it does so today, but the undercurrent is there.
That said, from friends who are lawyers, I hear tales of the "snotty rich kids" who do get off and whose crimes are hidden because their parents have money. One of them defended a rich kid who saw a group of hispanic people at a protest and drove his car into the crowd, killing one of them "by accident." That little lie got him off. I ask you- who drives a 2 ton vehicle into a group of people, claiming it was only to scare them, and walks away- some accident.Never made the papers either, and why do you think? (Just saying, since people jumped to the defense of snotty rich kids).
I'm not trying to be flippant about a very serious subject but MM was simply making a point about bringing up the matter over again and over again. So we all discuss it without actually using the "R" word but we all know what we mean.
Posted by: bxgrl at September 16, 2008 12:03 PM
socio-economic status is a cop out.
It's largely bad parenting, loss of family values and lack of self-respect.
here's the hard evidence.
Far Rockaway High School
Always a lower middle class area.
Same housing
Same location
Same school
Same board of education
Through the 30's 40's and 50's
produced 3 future nobel prize winners.
Recently had to be shut down and restructured as smaller charter schools due to the failure of the school as a whole. Too much violence in the surrounding areas. kids shooting kids, stabbing each other. everything but learning.
not enough respect for education. a failure of parenting and the emergence of a thug culture.
Posted by: Legion at September 16, 2008 12:06 PM
Sorry, guys, but race and class intrude upon almost every discussion about life in Brooklyn. We don't engage in discussing afterschool, or teen violence in Brownsville, East New York, or even Bensonhurst, because it's expected, no big deal, and doesn't affect us. Sad, but true.
It's only when it spills into "good" neighborhoods, or areas that are gentrifying, that it ends up here, and becomes a hot topic. I'm not saying it shouldn't be discussed, but only that it must be discussed because that behavior is not acceptable anywhere.
Afterschool programs, Big Brother/Sister, Boys/Girlstown, church programs, mentoring programs, whatever is needed to help not just the kids wandering aroung Clinton Hill, or after school in Park Slope, but all kids who need it, are paramount. All kids, no matter who they are, need guidance and direction.
We need to be just as outraged and saddened at the news that a kid gets stabbed on Mother Gaston Blvd, as we are a kid in Park Slope. Face it, we are not. Race and class will be obsolete and irrelevent only when we really all are equal in society's eyes, and sadly, that day is nowhere in sight.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at September 16, 2008 12:08 PM
Well put MM.
Posted by: A Guest at September 16, 2008 12:13 PM
bxgrl, I don't think anyone is jumping all over Montrose. We're just asking where in this story race and class was made an issue. At least A Guest gave some perspective on why he/she made assumptions. I virtually always agree with Montrose, but think it's a bit defensive to imply this is race/class baiting when nobody brought it up (again, perhaps I'm missing something in the story above that provides insight into the race/background of the youths in question). Why was there automatically that 800 pound gorilla in the room?
I think it's also unfair to assume some of us are not equally as outraged by a crime in Park Slope as we are of a crime on Mother Gaston Blvd. Who is doing the baiting here?
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 16, 2008 12:16 PM
bxgrl, put away the straw man. no one jumped to the defense of snotty rich kids. it was MM (and now, you) who jumped to bring them into this conversation, when they weren't initially here.
by the way, you might want to suggest to your attorney friend that he not betray his client's confidences, especially when people might be inclined to post details online. it's an ethical violation.
Posted by: i disagree at September 16, 2008 12:25 PM
No one's assuming that at all- but I'd be less than honest if I didn't say I think there are some who aren't. Those people have always been pretty blunt about it too. But in the main I think MM is reacting more to the way things are posted on brownstoner- we've all been involved in very acrimonius debates and sometimes the topics feel "set up" to encourage flame wars, not discussion. I honestly think that's what MM is pointing out, and just trying to bring a little context to the discussion.
Posted by: bxgrl at September 16, 2008 12:31 PM
i disagree- number one, I'm simply posting in response to what's been said. I didn't bring up the subject, but when someone says snotty rich kids don't carry weapons (believe me quite a few of them do), well, that's sounds like a defense to me. But please, don't give me credit for bringing them up- there were several posts referring to them after MM's and before mine.
Don't worry about my attorney friend- he gave no names or further details and it was in the context of a general conversation of defense vs prosecuting attorneys. It happened some time ago and what I posted is hardly "detail." Wasn't even in this state. Nor would I have posted anything more detailed, if I could.
Posted by: bxgrl at September 16, 2008 12:38 PM
I disagree, "snotty rich kids" was one very small phrase in one post I made, and was not the point of my post either, other than to include their behavior in a list of unacceptable behaviors. You have made that the sole basis of several posts denigrating my opinions, and now those of bxgrl. Get over it.
Your constant harping on "snotty rich kids" can only lead me to conclude that you were one, or have one. If that offends you, then perhaps you need to look at your own class issues.
And while we are at it, very vaguely mentioning a case, long after it is in the public and court record, with no details, whatsoever, is hardly breaking client confidences. You'd have a better case against Law and Order's writers than bxgrl's attorney friend.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at September 16, 2008 12:43 PM
This thread reminds me why Obama will lose this November.
Liberals can't deal with race issues honestly and plainly. Gives ammo to the Right.
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at September 16, 2008 1:21 PM
Easy Solution:
Tear down all projects in Gowanus near BH, PS & Cg. Tear down all projects in Fort Green. Rebuild projects in Bushwick, East NY & Crown Heights. It would be especially pleasing to see the locals interact with the Hassis in Crown Heights.
Posted by: PropJoe at September 16, 2008 1:23 PM
I have taught middle school and high school, in the burbs and the city. In Manhattan and Park slope.
These kids are socially all the same. The kids you speak of from the middle and high schools here in the Slope, however, deal with things that many others do not.
* Narrow sidewalks for the hundreds or thousands of kids who are getting out of school around the same time.
* Their need to release their teenage energy after being cooped up in school all day is confronted by the distrust that they feel aimed at then when they walk down the street.
They KNOW that none of their classmates are from this neighborhood. They KNOW that they don't look like the people who live in this neighborhood. They know that the loud. And they know that you are fully aware of these facts, too.
In short, they know how the neighborhood feels about them. And like all teenagers everywhere, they are much more sensative to distrust and disrespect than most adults are.
I don't assert this because it must be true. I assert this because they told me.
As for knives, well, I've seen any many in burbs as in the city. The issue is not simply knives. The issue is the climate combined with the knives. Give them more space and more respectful acceptance, their tensions wouldn't be so high.
Not that this excuses violence. There is a big difference between excusing and explaining. Frankly, I don't know the kids involved in these particular incidents. I don't know what happened. And therefore, I cannot draw any broad conclusions from them.
But I do know the broader context. And I know that those of us who live and/or work in the neighborhood have something to do with it.
Posted by: ceolaf at September 16, 2008 1:59 PM
ceolaf,
sorry but again you cannot argue with the facts. I gave you an excellent example.
Far Rockaway High School
the kids in that school all lived in the surrounding neighborhood. so your theory of violence as a consequence of surrounding snootiness is invalid.
Face it, with the decay of a strong family structure, namely a father to reign in adolescent male aggression, the kids are not alright.
It's not just me speaking. this is proven by countless societal studies on the role of the male in the household. sorry Rosy.
Posted by: Legion at September 16, 2008 2:29 PM
"In short, they know how the neighborhood feels about them."
ceolaf, sorry for sounding like a broken record, but why are you assuming the kids involved in the stabbing were not from Park Slope? Where are you (or anyone else) getting this from?
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 16, 2008 2:34 PM
Ceolaf-
I consider myself progressive liberal so lets meet on some common ground here. While I agree with the fundamentals of your opinion I have to say that you really have some blinders on. You think that if we change our attitude and opinion on rowdy kids that they will cease to behave like this?
Ever been mugged? Chased? Stabbed? Beaten up?
Have you lived in this city before say, 1990?
And sorry to be provincial but I'll ask the inevitable, are you from Brooklyn?
Posted by: Prodigal_Son at September 16, 2008 2:45 PM
MM - i'll get over it if you will. disagreeing with your opinion, and disagreeing about the relevance of your assumptions to the matter at hand doesn't mean that i'm "denigrating" anything. can't you handle people responding to your opinions? and why the need to get personal? i started my post, "with all respect," and you come back accusing me of being a snotty rich kid (or having one). nice.
if bxgrl has any facts to back up her implications about the snotty rich kid's case, then confidences were broken. if not, then it's supremely irresponsible to post what she did. either way, it's a dangerous and really foolish, and i have no doubt that the attorney friend wouldn't be happy about it. (fyi, attorneys have duties to former clients. or maybe that hasn't been on law & order yet?)
Posted by: i disagree at September 16, 2008 3:10 PM
Biff.
If you know anything about John J. High School (5th street/ 7th Ave) then you know that no kids living in Park Slope make up the student body. You also might know that there is "prison" of sorts in the basement of students who have been removed from their school and are "not welcome" anywhere else.
As to "snotty rich kids":
I have witnessed these kids from MS 51 (5th street / 5th Ave) run across the tops of eight to ten parked cars in a row, jumping from one to the next - causing several thousands of dollars in damage. Beatings of fellow "snotty rich kids" resulting in hospitalization.
Not sure if any of you have kids or how old they are but, this I know. I have three. Two who have not started school yet and one in eight grade. I would never let any of them attend either of those schools. Both types are ultimately the same on extreme opposite ends of the spectrum. Thankfully, we are moving out of Park Slope. Where? That is discussed daily by you all on other posts. I'll keep it close to the vest.
Posted by: pig three at September 16, 2008 3:45 PM
pig three, no I know nothing about John J. High School given I have no kids and don't live in PS, which is why I kept asking the question regarding how people can make the assumptions made above. Maybe if you were a little less "snotty" yourself, you would help decrease the derogatory references aimed at Park Slopers.
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 16, 2008 3:50 PM
I disagree, once again you take my words out of context. I no more get my legal information from Law and Order than you do, or brxgrl, for that matter. I am more than willing to have a substantive debate about this or any other issue, but not with someone who deliberately obfuscates by making throw away phrases like "snotty rich kids", or a mention of a tv show seem to be the meat of my argument. I take that as personally as you take being called names.
The fact remains that people like PropJoe may be mindless idiots, and here I will call names, but his statement is probably closer to what many think, than not. Please note, I did not accuse you of same. Ceolaf had a lot of good points, and I do not think that explaining why people do what they do is the same as condoning or excusing it. Pig three also make good points.
It all goes back to my original statement that there is no respect for anything in many of our kids, not for themselves, others, property, or authority. I do not see that as a racial or class thing, but a societal ill. However, when we hear of incidents of violence, our mindseye is not colorblind, or class blind, and we make racial and socio-economic assumptions about who is doing what, without any facts. We do ourselves a dishonesty to not admit that, because we all do it. I think an honest look of race and class in this country is beyond where we are now. Not just because of real racism, but because we all, and I do mean all, have a really hard time admitting that we all have preconceptions and prejudices.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at September 16, 2008 4:21 PM
p3, my daughter attended MS51, albeit in the gifted program, with no problems at all.
But I wouldn't have sent her to John Jay. ALtho I think it's no longer JJ but has been broken into a couple of smaller schools.
Some merchants on 7th Ave lock their doors at 3PM, and I personally have seen some of these kids stealing from the supermarket across from 321 and attack one of the workers.
Posted by: denton at September 16, 2008 4:34 PM
uff, MM and others...are you kidding me? You are the one race baiting and, much like a seasoned spindoctor, changing the conversation to YOUR talking points, not to the issue initially put out there. Being residents of Brooklyn means that we are interested in quality of life issues. We've all seen bad behavior by black and by white teenagers and when it crosses the line to violence in the community, it is important information. One can choose which aspects of it to dwell on, people can be so narrow minded that they would judge a group based on others' actions, people can reach out to those injured, or they can get involved in getting better after school problems - all of these scenarios are open to us as members of a diverse and complex community. You cannot be the resident thought-police and try to control what is reported on to block out possible negative connotations. The more you do that, the less your salient points and perspectives can be taken seriously.
Posted by: miss priss at September 16, 2008 4:47 PM
Biff,
Not trying to be snotty, sorry if it came across that way. Now I know why you are always "misunderstood" on this forum. Anyway, leaving the snottyhood behind.
Denton,
You should spend some time outside your daughters school at lunch time. Not model citizens. Are the "gifted" program kids allowed out at lunch time?
Posted by: pig three at September 16, 2008 4:59 PM
Biff,
My post was answering your question. Period after your name. "You" being third person - anyone making reference to John J. Understand?
Posted by: pig three at September 16, 2008 5:08 PM
pig three, my apologies too for taking your comment the wrong way. Sorry for being so quick to attack when you were merely trying to post a sincere response to my question. I wish you all the best with your three children and hope you find an area and school that you're happy with.
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 16, 2008 5:58 PM
MM - Show me where I took a single word of what you said out of context. You can't. And that's because I was not obfuscating at all, deliberately or otherwise. I was taking issue with the points you made, and responding to them. Maybe you're trying to back away from them now, or to revise your statement to something so general (We have issues with perceptions of race and class in this country. No kidding?) as to be pointless. That's fine, and that's your right. But if you don't like having the "throw-away phrases" that you inserted into the discussion mirrored back at you, perhaps you should reconsider using them in the first place. Taking rational counter-arguments personally and responding by calling names belies the culture of respect you're criticizing these kids for lacking.
Posted by: i disagree at September 16, 2008 6:11 PM
Miss priss, since when has any subject on this blog stayed totally on topic? Everyone is free to digress where they will, and usually does, so please stop acting as if I invented it.
Bringing up the issues of race and class is hardly race baiting. Oddly, that term seems to only come up when the issue is danced around and never addressed, and someone shines a light on it. You don't want to talk about it? Fine. You have no idea what real race baiting is.
And how am I being the thought police? Everyone thinks whatever they want about these or any other situation. The narrow thinking you are accusing me of is yours. I would welcome a genuine discussion of youth violence, or tensions between Park Slopers and the kids who go to the local schools. But that would mean a real discussion of race and class in Brooklyn. And I don't think very many of us are comfortable with that.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at September 16, 2008 6:17 PM
p3, I lived almost directly across the street from 51 for a decade. Honestly, I've never seen really bad behavior from 51 students. My daughter was never harassed or insulted or in a fight. There are security guards and at least one police officer there at lunch and dismissal. They're just young kids. In HS things can and do get uglier, I agree.
Of course I went to an inner city HS as one of about 3% of kids who were white, so it may be that I have looser standards than you.
BTW MS51 and PS321 were and maybe still are the only schools that are even allowed out at lunch in the entire school system. I read your question as wondering if white kids are in terrible jeopardy from the other less white kids at MS51 when they go out for lunch. I can assure you that they are not.
But I hope you find an satisfactory educational environment for your children. 321, 51, and LaGuardia HS worked well for our daughter, who went on to a decent private college and is now well employed and pursuing an MFA at the New School.
Posted by: denton at September 16, 2008 6:24 PM
I'm not the thought police, but I'll be the spelling police:
It's John Jay, not John J.
Posted by: sixyearsandcounting at September 16, 2008 7:54 PM
It had nothing to do with white kids or black kids. I have both. It had to do with behavior. Everyone on this post seems to make everything about race. John J. has every race. It is also a very poorly performing school. I want the best education the public school system has to offer for my children. PS 51 has every race as well. Performs very well, but is full of the "snotty rich kids" people were referring to earlier in the post. I know this because my oldest went to PS 321 (over rated and over crowded). Someone referred to Far Rockaway High earlier having produced Nobel Prize winners in the 30's, 40's and 50's - only to be shut down recently for failing as a school. Now that I know your daughter is out of college, your opinion of MS 51 and its students is out of date. You have no idea what is going on now. I know parents who have children there now and see the students and their behavior every day. The "just young kids" you refer to will soon be in high school. If the behavior is ugly in middle school, what do you expect to happen when they move on?
Posted by: pig three at September 16, 2008 8:14 PM
sixyearsandcounting,
Thanks for pointing out the error. I hate my spelling mistakes as well. I could say I am practicing my texting.
urs tru,
pig3
Posted by: pig three at September 16, 2008 8:26 PM
If any one is interested an arrest has been made. and B & N hires off duty NYPD to patrol the store---just one wasn't on when this happened.
Posted by: smeyer418 at September 16, 2008 10:11 PM
"I would welcome a genuine discussion of youth violence, or tensions between Park Slopers and the kids who go to the local schools. But that would mean a real discussion of race and class in Brooklyn. And I don't think very many of us are comfortable with that."
i am confused. your first comment in this thread stated that there are too many brownstoner posts about youth violence in brooklyn. now you say you would welcome a "genuine" discussion of brooklyn youth violence and park slope tensions. the import of these statements, taken together, is that you want this topic discussed only if people say things you agree with or consider "genuine." i doubt that is what you intended, but that is how it sounds.
the fact of the matter is that discussions about topics like these are always going to be messy and controversial. that doesn't mean they are not worthwhile. you can say your piece, others will listen, and hopefully you will listen to others too.
in any event, i am still at a loss as to how this become a race discussion, given the absence of any reference to race in the incident report.
Posted by: z at September 16, 2008 10:40 PM
"if bxgrl has any facts to back up her implications about the snotty rich kid's case, then confidences were broken. if not, then it's supremely irresponsible to post what she did. either way, it's a dangerous and really foolish, and i have no doubt that the attorney friend wouldn't be happy about it. (fyi, attorneys have duties to former clients. or maybe that hasn't been on law & order yet?)"- i disagree
I have an idea- why don't you stop trying to make a mountain out of a molehill? There were no confidences broken, and there are no details other than the most general.(Your first 2 sentences make so sense by the way), the conversation was amongst friends, not his colleagues and he gave no names or anything else. What I posted was just the bare bones, depersonalized.- so as much as I know you love attacking me for whatever reason, let's not blow it up all out of proportion- that's supremely irresponsible of you, no?
Posted by: bxgrl at September 16, 2008 11:35 PM
Z, I said that initial remark because I think sometimes topics on Brownstoner are chosen because they will be hot button issues, and anything regarding crime, violence, and rampaging kids is bound to gets the keyboards humming and will eventually bring up issues of race and class. Would we have even half the comments here if this was a report about 2 kids getting in a fight in a Brownsville school? Even if one had gotten killed? I don't think so. I didn't want to go there this morning. And I freely admit that if I am at the computer that day, I will probably jump in feet first, and I ended up doing that.
I don't expect people to necessarily agree with me. Most may not, and I don't post so people can nod their heads in agreement with my great wisdom. I'm just another anonymous voice trying to connect with my fellow Brooklynites. I call em as I see em, like everyone else.
I happen to think that, like the great writer W.E.B. DuBois said almost 100 years ago, that "the problem of the 20th (now 21st) century is the problem of the color-line". I would now expand that to include class. That doesn't make everything and every situation racial, and certainly does not make everyone a racist, but race and class are always there somewhere, and we are better off realizing that, and dealing with our own preconceived notions and assumptions, and how those notions affect our own actions, than acting like we didn't notice at all. That is not complementary to our liberal and fair minded view of ourselves, and saying this does not make me popular. I can deal with that.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at September 17, 2008 12:12 AM
Don't worry, Obama promised us not only hope but change too, so maybe after he is elected our rowdy youth will all join some community organization thing.
Posted by: Xander Crews at September 17, 2008 1:49 AM
People are quick, including myself, to assume that the perp was a kid from outside the neighborhood who attended John Jay.
Looks like he was a local boy afterall:
"Tuesday afternoon, police announced the arrest of a 14-year-old connected with the attack. Armed with information from witnesses, detectives apprehended the young suspect at 3:25 p.m. in his home on Sixth Avenue, a block from where the incident occurred"
Posted by: Architerrorist at September 17, 2008 8:20 AM
Archterrorist, that was my point. I could not understand how certain posters above were making assumptions without knowing the facts.
Posted by: Biff Champion at September 17, 2008 8:52 AM
I was not blaming "snootiness." Rather, I was adding particular dimensions of the problem to the discussion. In particular, I was trying to mention some of the factors that lead to stress and tension in these kids.
Do these explain violent incidents? Of course not! Do they help to explain them? Of course they do.
It is not merely a case of absent parents. It's not that simple.
As for why I assume that the kids involved in the stabbing were not from Park Slope? Well, I taught in one of the schools in the John Jay building on 7th Avenue. In the whole school (700 students), the only kid who claimed to be from Park Slope lived on 17th St. That's not an assumption, Biff. That's a fact. Kids in the Slope tend NOT to go to these schools. The odds are that the kids involved were not from the Slope. That's not an assumption. That would have been a deduction, had I made it.
I din'td deduce anything about those particular kids. Rather, I spoke to the tensions and stress they feel -- as a group -- when they come out of school. Even those few from the neighborhood can still feel it in the air. As I said, I don't know the particular kids involved, so I didn't say anything about them.
When thinking about the students in Park Slope, keep in mind that they older they are, the less likely they are to go to school in the same neighborhood that they live in. That's a trend, not an absolute.
****************
As for Far Rockaway, Legion, you are missing quite a few imporant points.
* SES and economic class are the same thing. Socio means something. Too often we say SES and we really just mean economic class. Too often we are trying to find real SES and can only go by income, and therefore use it as a proxy. What do I mean by that? Well, imagine a poor starving graduate student. Very low income. Very high SES.
Immigrant groups often have people of low income but high SES. So, "middle class" or "working class" can be misleading if not properly used and properly understood.
* We close schools down for different reasons that we used. Heck, we never even used to close schools down.
But the big different is in what we expected from schools. In the 30's, 40's and 50's, it was ok if all the minorities and low SES students dropped out before graduating -- or even before high school. Then, the high schools could focus on the better prepared students, the ones easier to send to college. Even when the lower track kids did not drop out, much less was expected of them.
In recent years, we have looked more at equity. On of the few good things to come out of NCLB is attention to kids across the spectrum. Minorities and low SES kids are not dropped out like they used to, decades ago. But they have not been graduating, and often schools have not make proper efforts to teach them.
So, the job of schools has gotten harder, with the more challenging kids staying in longer. And expectations for succeeding with those kids have gotten higher.
So, this school had 3 nobel laureates graduate back in the day? What % of the kids who were zoned for the school in those years actually graduated? How does that compare to the equivilent statistics today? And what kind of choices did those three have when came to selecting a high school? We have massive school choice now, in a way that the city did not back then.
I could go on and on about all the reasons why the the far rockaway high school of the 40's is not comparable to the far rockaway high school of this decade.
Posted by: ceolaf at September 19, 2008 10:15 PM
I saw the Court St. incident . Here you had an adolescent, nearly in a man's body, acting in an immature but dangerous way. He was being banned from the store by the manager for running around and screaming in the store, probably as a by play in horsing around with his friends. I don't think there was any more malice than that. The manager told the young man he was observed acting disruptively at other previous times and wasn't welcomed in the store. The young wanted to explain his actions. The manager didn't want to here it. The young man couldn't handle his situation, lost face along with his composure. He cold cocked the manager ( a hard punch flush to his face ) and got away from the security guards. A few minutes later the young man was back in the store sporting cuffs on his wrists as supplied by the the police officers who led him in. Once the manager identified him he was put into a patrol car and taken away.
Posted by: kidbklyn at September 20, 2008 10:34 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.