« New Yorkers Find It Ain't So Easy Being Green Brooklyn Co-Housing Moving Closer to Reality? »

August 15, 2008

What’s it Like in Crown Heights?

crownheights_0808.jpg
That's what Brooklyn Based has been asking, and two Crown Heights residents—a relative long-timer and a newcomer—are answering. The 12-year resident pays $864.72 for a fourth-floor walk-up, likes the transportation options and the West Indian Day Parade, and doesn't like the violence, not surprisingly. Still she feels safe. The three-year resident moved to a one-bedroom for $1,100. She finds the lack of big box commerce—dry cleaners and fruit stands but few big chains—a reprieve from mall-ized Manhattan, and like the longtime resident, appreciates the new upscale restaurants moving in. But she makes a point: new residents, and the businesses that accommodate them, seem to have little to do with longtime residents. Crown Heights has long been known as a neighborhood of duality, with African-Americans and Orthodox Jews sometimes in conflict, sometimes in harmony, but now there seems to be another Crown Heights emerging. Thoughts?
Photo by sahadeva.




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/5894

Comments

Duality? Arent you forgetting the huge West Indian population that lives there too?

Posted by: Guvna at August 15, 2008 9:32 AM

I wish they had interviewed a real "old-timer", someone who has lived in Crown Heights all their lives. I know many who still live in the houses they were born in and are family owned. It's a less known aspect of Crown heights North that many of the homes have been owned by Black families since the dawn of time (well, maybe slightly less), and many of these families are today the core of business and professional people who have stabilized the area and gotten landmark status for CHN. All the news about Crown Heights focuses on the problems and there is a vast, largely ignored working and middle class that has always been here.

Eastern Parkway divides the north and south of Crown Heights, and they are very different neighborhoods even as they undergo similar changes. When I first moved over here in 2003 on very rare occasions I would hear gunshots. Haven't now for several years. My neighbors have always been friendly and I have always tried to be outgoing and friendly as well. Many of the newbies moving in seem to operate in a cultural vacuum here. Their only interest is in their house or apartment, not the neighborhood per se. But many others make the effort to reach out and get to know their neighbors, and love it.

I see more mixing than either of the 2 residents mention. Not only are there Black and Hasidic groups working hard to foster better relations, but go to Brower Park and watch Black and Hasidic kids playing basketball together. It may not be a lot, but it's a start. The drug problem here is very real and there are strong block associations of both old and new timers working to get rid of them. drugs are a problem in every neighborhood in NYC, even so called "good" ones.

It's also interesting that although the landmarked district doesn't include Eastern Parkway, most of the hype is about the Parkway. It's a jewel- a gorgeous boulevard with the Brooklyn Museum, the Botanic gardens, tree lined Streets and enormous pre-war buildings. But it's only one aspect of Crown Heights.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 9:56 AM

Is that photo supposed to suggest the look of Crown Heights?
I'm no expert on the area but is not my impression. Most neighborhoods may have 'fringy' blocks .
And Guvna - the article in Brooklyn Based does discuss the 'duality', as Brownstoner puts it, between Hasidim and Carribean.

Posted by: Petebklyn at August 15, 2008 10:11 AM

Considering the entirety of CH, which the article stated was Atlantic Ave to the north, Empire Blvd to the south, Washington, east and Ralph, west, we are one of the largest neighborhoods in Brooklyn. Guvna is right to place the West Indian population front and center, as they make up the largest group of people in this large area. And within that community are subgroups composed of whatever island and country of origin, with at least 8 or so different countries, 3, maybe 4 major language groups, and a myriad of dialects in each. Add to that the African Americans, Hasidics, Hispanics, Arabs, Asians, and now, a growing white population, most of that under 40 years of age. That’s a lot of people.

What’s it like to live in Crown Heights? As Tikeshia Pierre, the 12 year resident said, “Crown Heights is very big, and some parts of ok, other parts aren’t.” Since one can say that about many other neighborhoods, I have to agree. My part of Crown Heights, the newly landmarked Crown Heights North area, is more than ok, but I am fully aware that other parts are not, as I am aware that we too, need improvement. I live smack in the middle between where both of the interviewees live, and as everyone knows, I am quite happy here, and plan to stay in Crown Heights North for the long run, I know it will continue its renaissance.

I think living here is like living in most parts of Brooklyn. You get up, go to work, come home and live in your home, and interact with family, neighbors and friends. There is little day to day drama here. I think about personal safety as much or as little as I do in midtown, or anywhere else. I go where I choose, when I choose, and spend a lot of time walking around my neighborhood at all hours, because I enjoy it. I am involved in the civic concerns of my neighborhood, and when I can, I worship in local churches. I food shop locally, and get most of what I want, and have no problem getting what I can’t elsewhere. Since I see all kinds of people on the train and bus doing the same, in different neighborhoods, I accept that for now, that is the way it is. I wish we had more amenities, but I’d rather have my deed to my house than a street full of restaurants. Amenities will come. I’ve never said Crown Heights was the perfect place for everyone, I don’t think it ever will be, and that’s not a bad thing, either. I’m glad I’m here.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 10:13 AM

Petebklyn- you're right. Not really indicative of the area. The brownstone blocks and the pre-war apartments are much more the norm. wonder why they used that photo- especially since the interviewees are on Eastern Parkway.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 10:14 AM

"many of the homes have been owned by Black families since the dawn of time (well, maybe slightly less), and many of these families are today the core of business and professional people who have stabilized the area and gotten landmark status for CHN. All the news about Crown Heights focuses on the problems and there is a vast, largely ignored working and middle class that has always been here."

Very good point, and this is also true about Bed-Stuy, a least in Stuyvesant Height and the surrounding area.

"Many of the newbies moving in seem to operate in a cultural vacuum here. Their only interest is in their house or apartment, not the neighborhood per se."

Also very true. These neighborhoods have a strong sense of community, and I'm worried this may get lost.

Posted by: Ibis at August 15, 2008 10:14 AM

Yeah, Petebklyn, that photo certainly is not indicative of the vast majority of Crown Heights blocks. I know the area pretty well, and I don't know where this is, at all. I'm guessing over on the western end of the neighborhood, where it meets Brownsville and East NY.

To get a true sense of the neighborhood, put the Crown Heights North House Tour on the calendar, Saturday, Oct. 4th.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 10:25 AM


I'm a bit puzzled, too, by the photo used to illustrate this post. Crown Heights has some of the finest residential architecture in NYC, although certainly there are blocks like the one in the photo above.

Posted by: East New York at August 15, 2008 10:28 AM

Ibis-The strong sense of community is a major reason why I love living here. My apartment is wonderful, a friend is my landlord, but if I didn't love the neighborhood I wouldn't be here.

Sure some people are less than friendly - but they're hardly unique to Crown Heights. What I have found here is a neighborhood much like the one I grew up in, filled with hardworking people of different backgrounds who think in terms of neighborhood and community.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 10:28 AM


"Yeah, Petebklyn, that photo certainly is not indicative of the vast majority of Crown Heights blocks. I know the area pretty well, and I don't know where this is, at all."

I believe this is Herkimer Street, east of Albany Avenue, although I may be mistaken.

Posted by: East New York at August 15, 2008 10:30 AM

I have my thoughts on why that photo was used. None of them particularly positive. Any explanations, Lisa?

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 10:30 AM

That photo reminds me of Baltimore.

Posted by: 11217 at August 15, 2008 10:38 AM

If you are correct, ENY, technically, that's Bed Stuy, as it's on the north side of Atlantic Ave. Not that it matters, other than it is a particularly unflattering streetscape for an article that proposes to give a true sense of life in Crown Heights. The original article by Brooklyn Based used a photo from the Crown Heights North Association's (CHNA) website, which has a large archive of photos of the landmarked area. Even the least flattering of those would have been more indicative of most of the area, much more than this one. One would not do a story on Park Slope and then use a photo of the auto repair shops on 4th Ave to illustrate it.

Sorry, Lisa, but very poor choice of photo, here.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 10:44 AM

here are links to some other crown heights photos--i chose the above one because I thought it was a lovely photograph, but i completely understand the objections. will think about this in the future.

http://flickr.com/photos/ilaria_papini/365472002/
http://flickr.com/photos/42369197@N00/2358845897/
http://flickr.com/photos/nrvlowdown/2068714281/
http://flickr.com/photos/nrvlowdown/2068715289/

Posted by: lisa at August 15, 2008 10:46 AM

Montrose and BxGrl,

Enjoyed your comments, as always.

But African-American families owning Crown Heights houses "since the dawn of time," BxGrl? You must be a young one to think a few decades was so long ago! It was more like the 1950's, when I was growing up in the neighborhood. In my kindergarten photos from P.S. 41, most of the kids were white -- Irish, Jewish, WASP.

Not that things didn't change. And change fast. Between 1956 when my family arrived and 1962 when we moved, our part of Crown Heights (next to the historic district) went from mostly white to almost entirely black, thanks to block-busting among the row houses and absentee landlords who did everything they could to turn stable apartment buildings transient so they could jack up the rents.

What a scene it was. Old-time white shopkeepers on Nostrand Avenue, young cats with "conked" hair and do-rags sippy-sipping on the corners, hausfraus and the occasional nanny pushing strollers up and down the sidewalks, racially-mixed groups of kids riding their bikes and playing stick-ball on the streets. Encapsulating the new Brooklyn: The Jewish-owned corner grocery with the poster of the first African-American Balantine Beer girl in the window. (Funny what impresses a little kid. Do they even make Balantine any more?)

It took less than a decade for Crown Heights to change and since then it's become even more complex. I don't remember a West Indian presence at all. And as for Orthodox Jews, there were very few if any in my day. Now, apparently, multi-ethnic hipsters are moving in.

The lesson: New York neighborhoods never truly belong to anybody. And the future of Crown Heights is wide open.

Nostalgic on Park Avenue

Posted by: NOP at August 15, 2008 11:05 AM

Thanks for the additional links, Lisa. A good selection and a nice cross section of a very large neighborhood.

NOP, great, as always, to tap into your memory well. Would love to see photos of those days.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 11:11 AM

Bxgirl - you said "It's a less known aspect of Crown heights North that many of the homes have been owned by Black families since the dawn of time (well, maybe slightly less), and many of these families are today the core of business and professional people who have stabilized the area and gotten landmark status for CHN."

I agree with the second part of your sentence about the core of black professinal and business people stabilizing the area and pushing for landmark status, but the first part of you post is not correct and feeds on the "this has been a [fill in the blank for race/ethnicity]" neighborhood since it was built - which usually leads to the whose been here longer fight. Crown Heights and all neighborhoods in brownstone Brooklyn have changed demographically over time, and will continue to do so (hopefully in a mixed way from my point of view) over time.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 11:12 AM

Oops, meant "who's" not "whose" in my post above.

Nice to hear of your experiences as usual NOP.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 11:15 AM

NOP - Balantine ale is available, yum, but not always easy to find.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 11:18 AM

I see NHS is creeping in. That is an engaging photo, plenty going on. I presume it was chosen for its visual appeal like most photos here, and not for its neighborhood promotional value. People are too sensitive.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 11:22 AM

1842 and Montrose:

There was a certain exhileration to living in Crown Heights in the 1950's. For a time it attracted progressives who wanted to live in a racially-integrated neighborhood: writers, poets, artists, activists, union organizers, lots of whom gave great parties where we kids could listen to energetic political talk.

This was the time of the civil rights movement, and there were people who thought Crown Heights, if stabilized, could represent a new kind of community. Maybe that'll happen -- even if fifty years later.

NOP

Posted by: NOP at August 15, 2008 11:29 AM

I think bxgrl was exaggerating only to prove a point; that black families have been here, as property owners, for quite a while. Traditionlly black Brooklyn neighborhoods share that distinction, which actually was not true for much of Harlem, for a very long time. Absentee landlords played a far greater part in the ebb and flow of Harlem's fortunes.

I have met many homeowners who have been in their homes, albeit starting as children, for over 50 years. Interestingly enough, NOP, most of them do have a West Indian background, but assimilation was the rule of the day back then, and people were not as nationalistic about their point of origin to outsiders, as opposed to the ethnically based pride of newer immigrants now. You may just never have known.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 11:30 AM

NOP and 1842- I was using a bit of hyperbole but I happen to know families who bought their house in the fifties (one actually in the 40's I believe) and was stating that to show people that Black homeowners are not a new phenomenon. (Of course for some ..er... younger people, the 50's is the dawn of Time. Also, if you're an Elvis lover it's the beginning. :-)

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 11:30 AM

dittoburg- in an article about the changes in Crown Heights, and interviews with people who live here for the beautiful pre-war apartments and life in crown Heights overall, this picture certainly doesn't illustrate or support the point of the article. As an streetscape it's pedestrian and misleading as an illustration. Simply a poor choice.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 11:36 AM

bxgrl, I would have loved to find a true native to interview, and we can still do that, and just add it to the site. If you know of anyone, you can email me at brooklynbased@gmail.com.

We are always on the lookout for longtime residents and newcomers to mid-to-outer Brooklyn neighborhoods. We've done Bushwick and PLG so far, but are actively looking for new, and willing interview subjects (which is easier said than done!)

Posted by: Brooklyn Based at August 15, 2008 11:39 AM

Montrose:

That's an interesting point about assimilationist tendancies in the 50's. I'm trying to remember if I ever picked up a cultural cue -- and I can't think of a single one! There wasn't the big parade on Eastern Parkway, as I recall. And none of my friends' parents spoke with a lilt or British accent. But you're right, differences were subdued back then, especially if you didn't know how to look for them.

NOP

Posted by: NOP at August 15, 2008 11:46 AM

Plenty going on, dittoburg, but not a slice of life in a typical Crown Heights block. It is not overly sensitive to want a more accurate portrayal. A block full of nondescript architecture and a row of curb cuts and front yard parking doesn't represent the majority of Crown Heights blocks. Neither would only a block of mansions, and nothing more, which would be easy to do, by the way. Something in the middle, as represented by the additional links offered, would have been better.

I would be equally disappointed if an article showing the people of Bushwick consisted only of tatooed, young white hipsters, as was the case in a recent magazine, as outed by Gawker, and posted here a couple of weeks ago.

However, Lisa addressed it, when brought to her attention, and I'm satisfied with her response, and won't be mentioning it again.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 11:46 AM

Yes people are sensitive but geez.....a photo of the houses down New York Ave in CHN.....or even a shot in my area of CHS down President St. would have been quite nice too.

Posted by: moreteasir at August 15, 2008 11:46 AM

How can you say its pedestrian with the three (or possibly four) different housing types including that intertesting shack with a large garden. This isn't a blog for kids where the picture is needed to illustrate the story to aid comprehension. You clearly suspect some motive in chosing that particular picture.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 11:46 AM

Let me be more explicit - the photo is obviously taken from a construction site (new) and looks at buildings that have been there for donkey's years (old).

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 11:49 AM

The photo is a poor representation of CH.

Posted by: A ClintonHillLady at August 15, 2008 11:52 AM

1152 - Perhaps you can get that street to secede from the neighborhood.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 11:59 AM

It sounds like the leitmotif of Crown Heights has always been change. There is no reason to think that the community will stop changing now. Who knows? the biggest changes may be yet to come.

Posted by: sam at August 15, 2008 12:00 PM

I hear you bxgirl, and I'm not old ;-). I do understand and know that black ownership of neighborhoods like Crown Heights in Brooklyn is not a new phenomenon. I just cringe at the implied "this is our hood and always has been" tone of people sometimes, whatever their background or race. I'm not saying you're doing that here; it's just that such thinking when it does occur leads to diviseness and mistrust when it does not have to be the case. Recognizing that all of our brownstone neighborhoods have changed dramatically over time and continue to do so (in terms of their demographic make up) will hopefully put things into perspective. I like how places are becoming mixed and not monolithic. Maybe a few generations from now that will be the norm.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 12:06 PM

Sorry, dittoburg, but many people here do need visual aids. The general demographic of this site has never been to Crown Heights, and many believe nothing but the constant negative hype. Same goes for illustrations of Bed Stuy, PLG, and other areas, that most have never seen in person. As I said before, if an article about life in Park Slope only had a shot up 4th Ave as its illustration, the howls of protest would have shot this thread's posts past 100 by now. Park Slope is more than 4th Ave, and Crown Heights is not well represented by this photo.

I'm not reading anything into the choice of the shot, it probably was chosen to illustrate the juxtiposition of the old as observed by the new. I get that. But sometimes, one has to look at the historic (and hysteric) context, and perhaps be not just artistically interesting, but just simple and literal. I long for the day when that is not the case, and any interesting photo will do, but unfortunately, we ain't there yet.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 12:11 PM

I need Spellcheck! Sorry about the atrocious spelling, my thoughts are faster than my fingers.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 12:14 PM

The point is the photo was picked to illustrate the story posted. and what makes people interested in Crown Heights.And that photo illustrates nothing about crown heights- it could be anywhere and is totally unrelated. If anything it makes people think this is typical of what Crown Heights is like and for that reason alone is a bad choice. There was, as MM points out, a lot of reaction to the article about Bushwick misrepresenting the neighborhood. You would think only young hipsters dressed in ripped rags and greasy moussed hair live there. for an article claiming to talk about the real Bushwick, it stunk. This photo is no different. With a vast area, the majority of which are wonderful row houses, beautiful pre-war apartment buildings- the things Crown Heights is actually known for, this choice of this photo stinks. As MM also said, Lisa addressed it and that's that.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 12:15 PM

MM, acting like the Chinese Olympic Committee in controlling what people see is not going to help. What do you find so objectionable about the people or buildings in the picture?

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 12:18 PM

I completely agree, 1842- that really wasn't my intention and I'm sorry anyone took it that way. I was trying to be a little (seeming very little!) humorous. Change happens and it can be for the good. I happen to love the juxtaposition of peoples and cultures, and I grew up in such a neighborhood. For the record I didn't think 1842 was your birth year :-)

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 12:21 PM

Interesting interviews. After reading them, my thought was "why the heck do either of these women keep living there?"

Woman #1:

"What I don’t like is the fighting — I could be lying in my bed and hear shooting down the block. There are times when I go to work I have to step over someone who doesn’t even live in the building because they passed out."

Woman #2:

"ow, because so many people have moved in, and the wealth gap is very visible, I think that presents a different kind of crime, crimes of opportunity. If you’re walking down the street and talking into your iPhone — where people have so much less — that presents a different kind of danger. I’m not saying I’m surrounded by potential criminals, but it is weird to see that intense wealth gap."

Then I read the comments and so many of you who live there seem to really love the neighborhood. Not sure what to believe.

But my impression of the area has always been that race and street crime were real problems, and unlike a not of other neighborhoods in the city, the source of the problem was the neighborhood itself. And it kind of sounds like that's what those woman are saying.

Maybe that's changing. Maybe I'm completely wrong and ignorant. Or Maybe it really is area by area.

Posted by: northsloperenter at August 15, 2008 12:24 PM

yes, the 40s and 50s were a long time ago, but these houses were built quite a bit longer ago than that. i know it's hard to imagine! and i may be (very) slightly off in this statement, but i believe these houses were built for essentially the same people that the houses in park slope, cobble hill, bed/stuy, etc were built for - the middle to upper middle class, defn. NOT low income folks. just like today, the low income couldn't typically afford to own homes of this quality back then.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 12:25 PM

What does that mean jingle mail? Poor people shouldn't be allowed to live in them? Did you think anyone said these homes were built in the 40's or 50's?

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 12:29 PM

Yes, most houses in the area are 100 years old.

And Jingle I happen to agree!

Posted by: A ClintonHillLady at August 15, 2008 12:30 PM

Posting that picture of Crown Heights is no different than saying that only stroller dwellers live in Park Slope. Take a picture of the Tea Lounge at 2pm and sure...there are 20 strollers out front. Take one at 8pm and it's all 20 something hipsters.

We have to rely on people checking things out for themselves, because the way the media portrays things is not always how those of us who know these areas see them.

We have to hope that anyone interested in Crown Heights would not look at this picture and assume it's representative of the whole neighborhood.

Showing the opposite...the glorious architecture (and nothing else) would probably have been just as skewed on the other end.

I do like this picture as a photograph though. I've found myself staring at it quite a bit.


Posted by: 11217 at August 15, 2008 12:30 PM

no, it means that your statement "since before the dawn of time" and "Of course for some ..er... younger people, the 50's is the dawn of Time" are both wrong and misleading. and more than that, my statement is an observation of reality. this is a capitalist system. it's not about who "deserves" one thing or another. it's about supply and demand. simple as that. if you are low income and happen to own one of these houses today, good for you. you wouldn't likely be able to buy it again at today's prices (or 1890s prices, adjusted for inflation). basically, i just don't like historical distortions used to make a slanted point.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 12:36 PM

I think that's right jingle mail, but to speak up for what I assume is bxgirl's point, there is a significant portion of Crown Heights and other brownstone neighborhoods that are predominantly black that are actually black owned and not exclusively populated by transient low income people, but maintained by professional and middle income people. You're correct, these areas were built for rich people and mid to late 19th century yuppies; at the same time, they've changed a lot and the owners of the past 40 years have done what they could with what they have to try to maintain the places through some rough years.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 12:36 PM

Dittoburg, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that photo, or the street it portrays. However, it is NOT indicative of the majority of Crown Heights streetscapes. Please re-read my last post, as I believe I explain my position quite clearly.

If anyone had one photo to illustrate China, and they chose a back alley in Hong Kong, that would be a poor representation of the beauty of China, and has nothing to do with politics. Same case here, and 'nuff said.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 12:37 PM

Lisa, please continue to pick interesting pictures, and not pro-agenda cross-sectional representin saccharine committee-designed soapy-clean all-things-considered bleurgh.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 12:38 PM

northsloperenter-

"But my impression of the area has always been that race and street crime were real problems, and unlike a not of other neighborhoods in the city, the source of the problem was the neighborhood itself."

Drug dealers live in every neighborhood, including the Upper east Side. Of course those are high end dealers, but don;t make the mistake of thinking you don't have criminal types in your own neighborhood.

Crown Heights is huge, and it changes sometimes block by block and the fact that the area is called Crown Heights really shouldn't blind anyone to the fact that in an area this size there are many "mini-neighborhoods" with some groups of blocks being better than others. And I think that holds true for other NYC neighborhoods as well. The 2 women interviewed represent personal viewpoints- and there are 8 million viewpoints in NYC. Not to downplay the problems we do have in Crown Heights, but people are moving in because it has so much to offer.

If I were interviewed about living in Brooklyn Heights I would talk about the noise, the dirt, the times I was almost mugged and the time I was at gunpoint. Or the construction that endangered (actual, not potentially)the apartment building I was living in- well, you probably wouldn't think BH would be a great place to live. yet it certainly is.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 12:38 PM

Jingle Mail;

You are correct in your assessment. Taking it one step further: most of the areas that today comprise "Brownstone Brooklyn" are contained within the boundaries of the original City of Brooklyn, which was a well-to-do place. The current Kings County had 5 towns/cities within it, which were (I believe, not 100% sure): Brooklyn, Flatbush, New Utrecht, Gravesend and Williamsburg. Of these 5 places, the city of Brooklyn was by far the most developed and wealthy. The Brooklyn Historical Society published a book of old Brooklyn photos, which shows the wealth that existed in those days.

Much of the way Brooklyn developed can be traced back to this old political division.

One other interesting note: up until it was incorporated in Brooklyn and NYC in 1895, Gravesend was one of the premier resort areas in the country with something like 3-5 racetracks and numerous elegant resorts.

Posted by: benson at August 15, 2008 12:43 PM

Fair enough bxgrl, but there's no debating that street crime and drugs related problems are more prevalent in Crown Heights or any lower income area where there is high unemployment. That's not casting aspersions on the hard working people living there who do what they can to maintain the neighborhood (unless they subscribe to no snitchin' rules).

And thank you for not assuming I was born in 1842 ;-).

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 12:44 PM

What drives nuts about Crown Heights (I used to live in Carrol Gardens for 12 years)is the FILTH and TRASH everywhere.

Who thinks it is okay to drop your soda bottle and empty bag of chips as you walk? Why not pick up the trash in front of your house? Nostrand Ave. looks like a hurricane hit it on any given day with all the debris scattered about.

Posted by: bmfesq at August 15, 2008 12:44 PM

jingle mail- "It's a less known aspect of Crown heights North that many of the homes have been owned by Black families since the dawn of time (well, maybe slightly less)"

they were supposed to be somewhat humorous in tone as the "maybe slightly less was supposed to indicate. - as I explained- You're misinterpreting.

So if you would like to point out what slanted historical distortion I made I'm waiting to see it. Because it is true that many black families bought homes in Crown Heights back then so what is the point you're making about poor people owning or not? I said absolutely nothing about who the houses were built for or who had a right to them.

Thanks 1842 and MM.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 12:45 PM

Don't get me started on that bmfesq. Drives me insane! Tree pits are not trash cans!! I find that picking up all of the trash on my block regularly seems to deter scumbags from dropping their crap on the sidewalk. Makes my blood boil though.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 12:47 PM

Jingle mail, I don't get what your point is, either. I think that picking on bxgrl's humorous statement about the dawn of time, or the 50's is to miss the entire point of her statement - that black homeownership in this area is a long time thing. The original owners here were upperclass folk, but aside from leaving a fine legacy of beautiful architecture, which is still being maintained by aforementioned middle class black ownership, so what? As NOP, 1842, and others have said, neighborhoods change, rise and fall, and rise again. What is important NOW, is the rising again part, and that has been helped by the ministrations and care of several generations of people who have always valued and cared for our architectual treasures, to the best of their abilities and budgets. This is a good thing, and the reason others are now finding their way here.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 12:47 PM

Folks on this site have too much time, too much money, a combination of the two....or are artists.....


Photo sucks but not only is Crown Heights cool, but Brooklyn is cool. I couldn't imagine having been born and raised anyplace else....and any place you photograph in Brooklyn is reflective of the place that made me me.

Posted by: moreteasir at August 15, 2008 12:49 PM

bmfesq - I'm with you, but its not limited to CH. There's a terrible litter problem in many Brooklyn neighborhoods. And then people complain that their neighborhoods look like cr#p.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 12:50 PM

1842- If I denied that I'd be foolish. I just don't like people defining the neighborhood or condemning it without getting the whole story. I love Crown Heights and am passionate about defending it. There are far too many good people who have spent years building it back up to let a bad picture or a news headline knock it down.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 12:51 PM

Bricks will fall on my head for saying this but I was surprised to find that Crown heights where I am, is far cleaner than where I lived on Court/Schermerhorn. I see people cleaning and sweeping the streets every morning. Nothing like getting up in the morning and having to sweep up the litter from the old Board of Ed because my building would get ticketed for their garbage blowing all over. They used to take out the paper for recycling in those big canvas bins, no bags and no covers. If the papers fell out and blew down the street it was our problem.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 12:57 PM

Bxgrl, I think jingle mail is reacting to your post in the way that most people would who read this blog, which is why I tried to diplomatically tease out why those sorts of statements get people all worked up. It's the implications of entitlement that get people on boths sides (newbie vs old timer) worked up, and your statement implied an entitlement to people who've lived in the neighborhood for the past 50 odd years (I understand you didn't mean it that way but it comes off that way in the post).

My initial reaction was the same as jingle mail but I did not write it that way because I did not want to imply that because the neighborhood was white for 70 to 100 years before it became predominantly black for 50 odd years, that whites were entitled to it in some way. No one is. If you can afford to buy or rent, and someone is selling or renting, you are entitled to buy or apply for a lease. The problems start when either side does not clearly state that they are implying entitlement to any one group to a neighborhood based on race.

I do agree that capitalism will be the determining factor in the make up of the neighborhood, and I'm fine with that - especially today where people generally seem to be more comfortable living with those that are different from themselves. In fact, the people moving into Crown Heights and Bed Stuy are the least likely to be racist in their worldview - otherwise, they'd just find somewhere else to go outside of NYC if it was too expensive in currently "white" neighborhoods.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 12:59 PM

MM. i don't dispute that CH has long-standing black ownership and solid community involvement. i think that is great. bxgirl just sounds like a revisionist and i believe in being historically accurate. people pay big bucks to live in former lower east side tenements today. i think that is great too, but i still know what those buildings were originally built for and i wouldn't try to say that hipsters have been living there since the dawn of time. but she's never one to let actual facts get in her way. when someone calls her on it, she can just say she was joking.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 12:59 PM

Not thrilled with that either, bmfesq, but it certainly is not confined to Crown Heights, or Nostrand Ave. I followed a well dressed, white guy in midtown Manhattan who opened a brown paper bag with chips, a soda and a napkin, and watched him drop them all, one at a time, as he finished with them, while walking down the street.

General piggery and bad "fetchin' up" knows no race, age or nationality. I wish it were different. If everyone had been raised by my mother, the streets would be shining like glass. We would never had had the cojones to drop litter on the street. Public intolerance of this would help stop this, but unfortunately, fear of reprisal wins the day, and I am as chicken as everyone else, sad to say.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 1:00 PM

MM- I neglected to mention that pterodactyls once lived in the house across the street and only moved when the T.Rexes moved in. I think about the same time Raquel Welch showed up in that outfit made of mammoth skins and taught us how to make fire.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 1:05 PM

MM - you came from a good family. Many in poor brooklyn neighborhoods don't. There is definitely more litter in our transitioning hoods than other more well to do environs, no doubt. It ain't all roses all the time. Some places do have more problems than others.

In any event, these neighborhoods will continue to improve, I think, and move back to being what they've been for most of their existence, upper class neighborhoods, but hopefully racially mixed.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 1:10 PM

"Arent you forgetting the huge West Indian population that lives there too?"

The majority of West Indians in this country would qualify as African American. The first wave of West Indian immigrants to NYC came at about the time of the Harlem Renaissance. Montrose is correct that this group assimilated into the larger African American community. However, Bxgl is also correct. I have several African American relatives who owned homes in Crown Heights since the 1800's. My grandparents first home was in Crown Heights and they purchased it in 1938. My uncle's wife actually grew up in Crown Heights as did her mother and her parents before her going back to the late 1700's as far as they can trace. It was called the Weeksville community and its borders were much larger than the current Weeksville site on Hunterfly Road.

The newest and biggest wave of West Indian immigrants didn't come to this country until after the passage of the Civil Rights Act which also opened immigration to groups who were previously restricted. This second wave of immigrants maintains much closer ties with their homelands and do display a cultural pride not displayed by the earlier immigrants but this is the case with many recent arrivals to the U.S. Technology makes it easy to keep in touch with those back home and air travel makes it possible to visit.

Posted by: Chaka at August 15, 2008 1:11 PM

MM - it may know no nationality but it certain knows cultures. There is a lot of variation in different cultures approach, or even recognition, of litter. We should make it part of NYC culture.

I know what you mean about fear of reprisal, and sometimes I have challenged people and other times I have not. I once had a gun pulled on me for taking a guy to task about not cleaning up his dog's poop. When I was younger and more impetuous I did once throw a bunch of MacDonalds garbage back into the car of some guy who had had just defenestrated it. He was too astounded to react.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 1:13 PM


My street in Crown Heights is among the cleanest I've lived on in Brooklyn, and I've lived in Park Slope and Prospect Heights. Around 80% of the homeowners on my block sweep our sidewalks daily, something that rarely happened when I lived in the Slope.

Posted by: East New York at August 15, 2008 1:22 PM

1842- lots of people on this site love to put words in people's mouths and since I already tried explaining, as did you and MM, the problem is jinglemail's. But I ask you to point out where I made any reference to entitlement- no where. I also wrote about the good things going on, the fact that I like the mix of old and new, and nowhere is there anything that smacks of "entitlement." I get really tired of posters doing interpretations based on their own biases or neuroses on brownstoner. It sucks.

And jinglemail I'm calling you on your statement about facts. Just because you made a mistake and can't gracefully see how to get out of it, don't make it my problem. Once again, because you seem to be thick as a brick, is that this group of long time black homeowners has been largely ignored in discussions of crown heights. And if you can't understand the concept of humor or being facetious to make a point I grieve for you. You claim to be so in love with accuracy- not doing a good job of it today are ya? Drop it- you've dug enough of a hole for yourself.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 1:23 PM

That's my point bxgrl, you never said anyone was entitled, but people on this site are preoccupied with the concept, so everyone has to be aware of the implications of statements like those you made regarding blacks owning the neighborhood since the dawn of time. Sarcasm, humor, hyberbole don't go down well on blogs, hence the reaction of jingle mail.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 1:28 PM

"I get really tired of posters doing interpretations based on their own biases or neuroses on brownstoner"

Unless it's your neurosis about representations of CH of course.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 1:30 PM

Jingle mail, you really need to relax and take a chill pill here. You do understand that bxgrl’s remark about black people owning in Crown Heights since the “dawn of time” was firmly in the camp of hyperbole, don’t you? I trust you understand hyperbole, an exaggeration meant only to prove a point, not a factual statement on the passage of time. Sheesh.

We all know that the homeowners of Victorian Crown Heights were wealthy, white men. Again, sowhat? If you want to be factual, and not given to hyperbole, then surely you know that before them, the original people on this land were the Lenape people. They were followed by the Dutch and the English. In fact, the land that was sold as lots to the builders and speculators who built much of the Crown Heights we see now was sold by the family of Lefferts Lefferts, who owned African slaves, who once worked his vast farmholdings. So many diverse people have left their mark on this community. We honor them, their histories and contributions, good and bad, and now we have this architecturally and culturally significant neighborhood to work with and preserve. That’s what’s important now. Bxgrl is proud of this neighborhood’s history, both 100 years ago, and more recently. She thinks, and I agree, that the contributions of those who lived here 50 years ago are as important to that history as that of the wealthy people who were also proud to call it home back then. All have a part to play in making Crown Heights a community we can be proud of.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 1:32 PM

Bxgrl, I hope you chill sometime. Ever notice you're always getting in arguments with people? I tried to figure out what you were trying to say with your comments, and it was not controversial in the end. But to start saying that long time black homeowners have been largely ignored in discussions of Crown Heights is bunk. You've got a chip on your shoulder. Montrose has his point of view that he expressly clearly and respectfully. You might want to take notes or we'll all continue to see your posts being 'misinterpreted'.

Have a good weekend!

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 1:33 PM

Of course :-)

-But actually my reaction is closer to "accuracy" based on the article. A lot of us neurotic CH'ers posting here today.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 1:34 PM

where did i make a mistake? you're the one who made a mistake. just admit that you were trying to imply that CH is and always has been (since the dawn of time) a black neighborhood. i'm calling you on your "facts". i didn't make a judgement call on today's reality one way or another.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 1:34 PM

Chaka:

That's very interesting information.

I learned about Weeksville just recently -- and it's only a short distance from where I lived and went to public school in Crown Heights!

Who knew? All that rich history was ignored or suppressed in the 50's. (And only a couple of years ago did the Historical Society hold the "Slavery in New York" exhibition. How many New Yorkers knew there were slaves right here in the city? They comprised a third of the population at one point and New York was the second largest slave port, right after Charleston!)

A friend of my parents named Paula Marshall wrote a novel about West Indians buying houses in Crown Heights during the 1940's, based on her own family, but I don't remember meeting any. Montrose may be correct that people were busy assimilating during the 1950s. (I can't imagine any of my friends' dads changing from their chesterfields into feathers for the Eastern Parkway parade!)

NOP

Posted by: NOP at August 15, 2008 1:38 PM

1842- I was not attacking you and if you look at most articles and posts about crown heights that is indeed the case. I try to be as respectful as possible and I defend myself. I was not making a personal comment on you but in general. I certainly have enough experience with posters on this site to know first hand about being attacked and I don't like it. In fact i thanked you for your help in trying to explain.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 1:41 PM

Why don't you read my posts at 11:30 and 12:21? And no- I wasn't implying that at all because I happen to know the history of the area. Since you obviously can't grasp that just leave it alone.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 1:46 PM

NOP wrote, of CH in the '50s, that "there were people who thought Crown Heights, if stabilized, could represent a new kind of community".

That's pretty much what happened just across Empire Blvd., in PLG. The difference was the stabilizing effect of the Lefferts Manor single-family covenant and the absence of the hasidic--black divisiveness.

Posted by: Bob Marvin at August 15, 2008 1:49 PM

I know you thanked me bxgrl, I appreciate it. Let's all just agree to be nice. I'm sorry if I'm coming down hard on anyone. This is why I don't post much! Not sure why I appointed myself the passive aggressive mediator here?! :-P

Have a good weekend.

Posted by: 1842 at August 15, 2008 1:54 PM

I don't agree with Bxgl that often but I have to stand by her on this one. Although Blacks were not in Crown Heights since the dawn of time, they were in Crown Heights since at least colonial times and although the vast majority of Victorian Crown Heights homeowners were wealthy white men, there were a significant number of Black homeowners, as well.

Many of the groups who came later and also added to the beautiful mosaic that is Crown Heights, often forget this fact. This fact doesn't give any one group greater claim to the neighborhood than any other, but it is just a matter of acknowledgement.

Posted by: Chaka at August 15, 2008 1:56 PM

and to you too 1842.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 1:56 PM

it's not worth my time to even scroll back up. i have been a reader of this site since before the "bxgirl" moniker came into existence, so i have seen your posts from the beginning. they are usually divisive, confrontational and light on facts/logic/focus. hyperbole. yes.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 1:58 PM

This post clearly illustrates the framework of covert race/class warfare. You suckers bit the bait and the hits prove it.

This photo was chosen by choice, not by "accident".

But people time is very short in this Mutant Real Estate Bubble and discussions like this will be moot very soon.

You can not stop "The What", you only hope to contain him.....

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...

Posted by: what at August 15, 2008 2:06 PM

And what are you contributing, jingle mail, other than more divisiveness? Bxgrl is as entitled to her opinions, and her way of expressing them, as anyone else here, many of whom are certainly more confrontational and downright nasty.

While you may not agree with her opinions, I hardly think that her use of an often used exaggeration like "the dawn of time" is worthy of this amount of discussion. If you didn't get it when she said it, her explanation following, done in good humor, certainly should have cleared it up. Seems to me that you are being overly confrontational on a very minor point in an otherwise decent conversation here.

I've been reading this site as long as you have, and disagree with people, both named and anonymous over the years, right and left. Most people here do. Bxgrl is passionate about her causes, and questions everything, as is her right. I have never seen her attack unless she is attacked first, and then she takes no prisoners. How is that different, or less full of facts, focus or logic, than anyone else? 90% of her posts are as innoculous and non- confrontational as anyone elses. Perhaps she needs to be thicker skinned about all this, but I think she is unfairly been chosen as the bad guy here, and it is totally unwarranted.

I've been wanting to say this for a while, so here's as good a place as any.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 2:19 PM

NOP,

I know the book well. It is called Brown Girl, Brownstones.
She tells the story of trying to fit in with the already established middle class Blacks and dealing with racism from the White community.

The history of Brooklyn is fascinating and much of it as far as the contributions of people of color remains unknown. I only knew about Weeksville because I have family ties there. Similarly very few people know about the large community of African Americans who began to settle in Bensonhurst in the early 1900's and whose descendants are still there today althought there numbers are dwindling or the African American Holmes famliy of Canarsie for whom Holmes Lane is named. They sold a large tract of land to Harry Waxman who developed the part of Canarsie now referred to as Seaview Village. The homes there are called Waxman splits (ranch.)

Again, I would not have known about any of this if it were not because of family ties.

Posted by: Chaka at August 15, 2008 2:21 PM

FYI I have been a reader/poster on this site for far longer than bxgrl has been my username. "it's not worth my time to even scroll back up" So in other words you'd simply rather be wrong. And your moniker seems very new- you can certainly accuse me of anything you want - divisive, confrontational, etc. Sounds like nearly everyone on this blog -going after me the way you did doesn't make you out to be all warm and fuzzy either. Dare I say it takes one to know one?

Have a nice weekend.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 2:22 PM

Chaka, the contributions of black folks to the history of New York is a worthy book. So much is not known, especially from the Colonial through Victorian ages.

Too many people think we came here unasked for, poor and unwanted, and have been in that same position for the last 300 years. Our history is part of the fascinating history of this great city.

More, please!

Posted by: Montrose Morris at August 15, 2008 2:34 PM

Chaka;

Are you sure about the African Americans in Bensonhurst? I've recently read a book on the development of that area and this is the first time I'm hearing about this. Are you sure you are not referring to the small community in Sheepshead Bay (around East 16th Street) which is a remnant of the days when there were many race tracks in the Gravesend Area, and this community worked in them?

By the way,another small bit of historical trivia. The early African American community in Crown Heights of which you speak was not only known as Weeksville. It was also derisively known as Crow Hill by the neighboring Victorians. If you go through old Brooklyn historical documents, you will probably see this name more than Weeksville.

Posted by: benson at August 15, 2008 2:35 PM

"This photo was chosen by choice"

Classic What babble. Thank God he's back with his inimitable language-confusion.

Posted by: dittoburg at August 15, 2008 2:44 PM

Very interesting comments made, for the most part. I moved to CH in Mar. 2001 and felt pretty safe. I was likely the only white female within a 3 block radius of Eastern and Franklin. Quite different now. I fell in love the diverse nature of the hood. Was extremely respectful of my neighbors, of course. I just hope it doesn't become like my ex-hood Cobble Hill!
As an aside, I would like to open a coffee shop or supper club on ground floor but I assume it will take much capital to do so and may not be zoned for commercial. I know that someone in Sunset Park was thinking of this also. Advice, if any?

Posted by: HurricaneKate at August 15, 2008 2:50 PM

yeah bxgirl, i'm so wrong. if that's the case, then it would be ok to make two little changes to your "hyperbole":

It's a less known aspect of Park Slope North that many of the homes have been owned by White families since the dawn of time (well, maybe slightly less), and many of these families are today the core of business and professional people who have stabilized the area and gotten landmark status for Park Slope North.

One of my old professors had the best advice. Read, think, write... Then speak. Have a nice weekend.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 3:06 PM

Montrose, Chaka, and Benson:

I've heard of "Crow Hill" before, but hadn't related it to race. Sheesh! It really sticks in the throat!

It's remarkable what we don't know, aren't taught, don't want to know, refuse to learn.

A deep exploration of Crown Heights uncovering all this social history would be fascinating. And what better time to write one, just as the neighborhood and Brooklyn are coming back.

Paule -- not Paula, as I wrote above -- is still alive. Now there's somebody to interview!

I remember her as tall (regal, really) but then again I was small. She was typical of many Brooklyn women then: attractive, kind, and carefully done up in skirt and blouse. Crown Heights ladies and moms were usually like that. And some, like Marshall, were real artists. (Although I don't know where she lived. I only met her tagging along with my parents to a party.)

That was another side to Crown Heights back in the day. Complex, accomplished, strong-willed women, black and white, who were often at the forefront of social advocacy. The saw their neighborhood as representative of the country's progress, and didn't hesitate to organize a march and take to the streets.

Man, it was some time to grow up!

(I recently had lunch with my brother in midtown. Looking around the club's dining room at the other middle-aged types in Brooks Brothers blue I asked him:

"How come we don't buy into most of this sh*t?"

"Because of Crown Heights," he answered. "That's where we learned that appearances have nothing to do with the intrinsic value of things."

Another great lesson from a Brooklyn childhood.)

NOP

Posted by: NOP at August 15, 2008 3:13 PM

Chaka, great history there. However, I dont know about the assertion re the vast majority of West Indians being considered African Americans. Would that be true of East Flatbush too? All I am saying is that there is a distinct West Indian flavor to the area. The music, the food, the businesses, etc all show west Indian influences. Your post seemed to imply that this would not be apparent in CH, because it was all assimilated into and became African American.

Posted by: Guvna at August 15, 2008 3:13 PM

"One of my old professors had the best advice. Read, think, write... Then speak. "

You should have taken his advice.

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 3:27 PM

Crown Heights is a shithole that needs to be nuked.

Posted by: Xander Crews at August 15, 2008 3:31 PM

real zinger. i hope you have more of those. i really just feel sorry for you. it must suck to go through life as a moron.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 3:34 PM

My feelings, crushed. :-(

Posted by: Xander Crews at August 15, 2008 3:38 PM

let me just pre-empt you.
"it must suck to go through life as a moron"

i don't know, you tell me.

that one would have been a real zinger too. you are officially on my bad side. too bad i don't usually have all day to sit around and post bullsh!t like you do. otherwise, i would tear you a new one every day. just like today.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 3:39 PM

i was talking to bxgirl, xander. at least you come out and say it.

Posted by: jingle mail at August 15, 2008 3:40 PM

j m- if that was your idea of a real zinger or tearing me a new one, your standards are far too low. I'm done for the day thanks- places to go, people to see, things to do.

How about we just get past it and start new from here?

Posted by: bxgrl at August 15, 2008 3:58 PM

Benson, I am certain it was Bensonhurst because I grew up there. The area is sometimes referred to as Bath Beach. We were mostly around 18th Avenue and Bath Avenue. Mount Zion Baptist Church on Bath Avenue predates Saint Finbar's and is where my in-laws were married in 1945. My father-in-law reported to the draft board at the JCH on Bay Parkway for WWII.

and

Guvna, by referring to West Indians as African Americans I meant that they are of African descent having been brought to the West Indies from Africa as slaves and now living in America. Of course there are cultural differences between the descendants of Africans brought to the states and those taken to the West Indies. Just as there are cultural differences between Blacks from the Sea Islands of SC and GA and those in New Orleans.

Posted by: Chaka at August 15, 2008 4:01 PM

Oh also Guvna, the distinct West Indian flavor present in certain neighborhoods in Brooklyn comes from the more recent immigrants. We saw the West Indian American parade grow as the West Indian population grew. My grandfather was born in Barbados and he along with many of the other first wave of immigrants who came to NY in the 1920's saw themselves as part of the bigger group of African Americans who were all forced to deal with segregation and racism as Blacks in America. Marcus Garvey who was from Jamaica forged a very large coalition of African Americans - that is Americans of African descent - to combat their collective problems. His answer of course was to go back to Africa.

The more recent immigrants came, as I stated in my first post after the Civil Rights Act of 1965. Their experiences were very different from the earlier arrivals so they did not have as much as a need to assimilate. We see much of these cultural distinctions playing out in local politics. It started with Una Clarke (Jamaican and Yvette's mother) going after Major Owens' (American) seat and playing up her West Indian heritage to get votes.

Posted by: Chaka at August 15, 2008 4:24 PM

yes, the more recent immigrants make a strong cultural distinction between being 'carribean' vs. african-american.

Posted by: jungular at August 17, 2008 11:12 AM

'Caribbean' vs African American? Most of them are Black i.e. African-American! There is no 'Caribbean' American category on any census or other type of form requiring a racial/cultural distinction. I never even understood the term 'Hispanic.' I know 'Hispanic' people that are Black, White and one who would technically qualify as Asian.

Posted by: Just Wondering at August 18, 2008 9:46 AM

and you speak from what great fountain of knowledge, just wondering? "There is no 'Caribbean' American category on any census or other type of form requiring a racial/cultural distinction." And that means it simply can't exist? You're white, it seems. Tell me you never said. I'm Irish-American or Italian or Norwegian? Those aren't on census forms either but only a fool would say those distinctions don't exist. It's all part of the rich immigrant contribution to American society which people like you would love to ignore.

Posted by: east river at August 18, 2008 10:40 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions