« Co-op of the Day: 130 8th Avenue, #3H Development Watch: 96 Rockwell Topped Out »
July 16, 2008
House of the Day: 1372 Dean Street

We're loving the looks of this brick three-story house at 1372 Dean Street in the Crown Heights North Historic District. From the outside, that is. Who could resist that rounded tower? The inside, however, is looking a little worse for the wear and makes the asking price of $1,250,000 little more than a pipe dream in this market, in our opinion. What's more, this place is chopped up into a five units, which presents its own set of potential drawbacks. (Three of the apartments are currently rented.) On the positive side, there's a driveway with room for two cars. We just don't see how a place like this is going to clear a million bucks in this environment.
1372 Dean Street [Century 21] GMAP P*Shark
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/5522
Comments
It doesn't matter if you find someone willing to pay this price cuz a bank will never make a loan based on it.
Posted by: Whoops Johnny at July 16, 2008 1:33 PM
$650k cash!
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at July 16, 2008 1:34 PM
Lovely facade, rustic lived in interior ;), up and comming 'hood - lop of $250ks and this beauty will sell..
Posted by: qis4quincy at July 16, 2008 1:35 PM
Agreed that this price is not realistic in the current marketplace. Perhaps 800/900 is more like it.
Posted by: wasder at July 16, 2008 1:37 PM
Hey Dumbasses, this POS has been on the market since 2005! Too bad the Asshats didn't get the memo.
BTW This Blog suck horse balls! It was fun with the guest thing!
The What
Someday this war is gonna end..
Posted by: what at July 16, 2008 1:52 PM
Yep, agree with wasder, and others. Great looking place, probably not much period detail left, which is a bummer. I love the turret, too.
Great looking block, and this house is across the street from the oldest house still standing in Crown Heights North, the George B. and Susan Elkins House, at 1375 Dean.(circa 1850-55) The Elkins house also needs an owner and a sensitive restoration. It is listed with Corcoran, and for far less than this house. I really like this block, and check to see what's selling here every once in a while. Thank goodness it's landmarked.
The adjoining house in the photo is also empty, and was for sale last year, but the realtor never answered my phone calls or emails, and did not show up for an open house, which really is tacky and unprofessional. It has since been removed from the market. That house is a one family, and looks like one of those wonderful period gems that are certainly few and far between. I think there is some kind of group home in the house next to the empty one, and it separated from these two houses by the driveway of that home. The rest of the block is a mixture of limestones, brownstones and a couple of small apartment buildings.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 16, 2008 1:57 PM
We were looking in Crown Heights, we stopped and waiting to see what the market does. This is way overpriced for this area.
Also, how is there a triplex for the owner and three apts??
Posted by: bayridgegirl at July 16, 2008 1:59 PM
What happened to some parts of Brooklyn always amaizes me. This house is beautiful, such a piece of history and a reminder of the greatness of an era past. This must have once been a pretty wealthy part of town. One day this house may be very desirable again ... but for now...
Posted by: Aussie at July 16, 2008 2:08 PM
What happened to the Elkins house (1375 Dean)? Did it sell? I know longer see it listed on Corcoran's site. We were going to go look at it, but realized we probably can't get financing for a house that's not habitable. (I still dream about that house though).
Also, what happened to 1171 Dean Street - listed as HOTD, I think last week. Did anybody go see that? That one interested me, but not hubby.
Posted by: bayridgegirl at July 16, 2008 2:17 PM
Aussie has it right. What a great property, but what neglect! You can't force people to sell at a certain price, but if this were listed at 750 or even 800k, bet someone would come along and convert it back to a 1 or 2 family dwelling. At this price, it's for slumlords only.
Posted by: Bolder at July 16, 2008 2:39 PM
I think your right Bolder. 850K and this house would sell in a New York minute. This house is worth 1.2 million but it needs about 200K to restore it to its original glory. Bayridgegirl have you look over in Stuyvesant Heights on the other side of Atlantic? There are some very nice homes over there for sale and just out of the landmark district on streets like Hancock and Jefferson there are some great four story brownstones on the market going for under 850K.
Posted by: Amzi Hill at July 16, 2008 2:48 PM
If it has 5 floors, perhaps 2 apartments are on one floor, obviously very small apartments. The first brownstone I lived in in Bklyn Heights was like that. the landlady had 3 floors (basement and 2 above),and the top 3 floors had 2 apartments each.
It's really a shame they are keeping this price so high, although I'm sure it will go down, because the house deteriorates. Don't understand why they have no kitchen photos and only that one bath which certainly does nothing for the sale of the house.
Posted by: bxgrl at July 16, 2008 2:48 PM
bayridgegirl, you are correct. Lois Thompson of Corcoran used to have the Elkins house listing, it was on the website not all that long ago. I guess no takers. Too bad. It could be a unique house with a lot of class in the right hands, which happen to sit in deep pockets.
Please keep looking, we've still got lots of great homes here.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 16, 2008 2:51 PM
1370 Dean (adjoining) is beautiful, MM. PropertyShark does not show a sale date, but Trulia says it sold for $700K in Nov 2007; not sure how accurate that site is.
http://www.trulia.com/homes/New_York/Brooklyn/sold/20813709-1370-Dean-St-Brooklyn-NY
That block has some amazing houses and, unfortunately, a lot abandoned ones. I keep waiting for the right abandoned one to come on the market.
Posted by: laurie at July 16, 2008 2:51 PM
Is there anything more retarded than the fake what posting on the blog that he doesn't like anymore? I would say the mandatory registration has already achieved its desired effects: more objective discussions and less what.
Posted by: FatLenny at July 16, 2008 2:52 PM
Amzi Hill - love the name. Another great Brooklyn architect of the middle to late 19th Century.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 16, 2008 2:53 PM
I knew that you would get it Montrose Morris. I just found out that he was the architect that designed my house in 1889 and a lot of houses in Bedford Stuyvesant, Crown Heights and Park Slope along with his son...
Posted by: Amzi Hill at July 16, 2008 3:00 PM
Montrose, thanks. We stopped looking aggressively - hubby is a little panicked with all that is going on in the financial world. I still browse throught the listings and if something catches my eye, we'll follow up.
We tried to go to the Elkins Open House (way back), but got our dates wrong. So we ended up walking around the neighborhood and were very impressed with the architecture. Have been back several times, just looking around. When the time is right, we might be your neighbor.
Laurie, seems like, we're both looking for the same thing :)
Posted by: bayridgegirl at July 16, 2008 3:03 PM
"Is there anything more retarded than the fake what posting on the blog that he doesn't like anymore? I would say the mandatory registration has already achieved its desired effects: more objective discussions and less what."
Hey Fucktard, at what cost?? I would like to thank Brownstoner for killing this Blog. The dialogue has been bland and boring. I wonder what going to happen when Wall Street gets hit by that Shockwave?! This place has turned into a pompous circle jerk by fart smelling smug assfucks!
But don't worry! While you are asleep the Big Boys are assraping you now. Did you see Paulson asking CONgress for a Fannie and Freddie bail out? No you didn't, why? you was here jerking out with your "Fake What" postings.
Enjoy the little time you have left of this Mutant Real Estate Bubble. I wonder what will be the talk in 2009?
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: what at July 16, 2008 3:16 PM
why is it a "Mutant" real estate bubble and not a plain old orcdinary bubble What?
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at July 16, 2008 3:21 PM
Aussie- Crown Heights North was once a very wealthy area and to some extent changes over the years have mitigated that impression as so many incredible mansions were torn down. CHN had quite a few freestanding mansions in Brower Park, as well as other parts of the area. Many of the large apartment buildings were built on the site of those mansions, and the size of the later buildings can give you some idea of the scale of the original mansion footprint. Montrose Morris is far more knowledgeable about the area than anyone else I can think of so hopefully MM can post about this.
Posted by: bxgrl at July 16, 2008 3:25 PM
"why is it a "Mutant" real estate bubble and not a plain old orcdinary bubble What?"
Massive expansion of the money supply! You see your Homeboy Greensperm stopped publishing M3 money supply.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_supply
The money supply, or money stock, refers to the total amount of money held by the nonbank public at a point in time in an economy.[1] There are several ways to measure such an amount (called a monetary aggregate), but each includes currency in circulation plus demand deposits (checking-account money).[2][3]
So now we can make loans to Asshats and lie about inflation! If you want to the true money supply check this site out.
http://www.shadowstats.com/
Have you ever wondered why the CPI, GDP and employment numbers run counter to your personal and business experiences? The problem lies in biased and often-manipulated government reporting.
You see Dave this is the foundation for my rants! Every Asshat wants to attack The What but don't want to research information. When not if the drain all the excess money out of the system, the whole house of cards collapses!
The What
Someday this war is gonna end..
Posted by: what at July 16, 2008 3:28 PM
Yo Fatty, if it's signed "What" it's the real McCoy. That's his new handle.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 16, 2008 3:30 PM
According to Webster (on-line)
Mutant: of, relating to, or produced by mutation
Mutation: a relatively permanent change in hereditary material involving either a physical change in chromosome relations or a biochemical change in the codons that make up genes
How this relates to Real Estate, I don't know.
Posted by: bayridgegirl at July 16, 2008 3:36 PM
What...I don't need a "cut and paste" economics lesson. I've been doing this far longer than you've read about it.
reference me if you will the "mutant" description from somewhere.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at July 16, 2008 3:36 PM
bxgrl...why was that area so well developed and wealthy? proximity to the LIRR? I don't know when the LIRR was first put through.
Corcoran has another listing on dean Street that's incredible for around $1 MM. The description seems very dated though talking about Restoration Plaza so I'm wondering if it's still on the market...
1265 Dean St.
http://www.corcoran.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&ListingID=1299736&ohDat=7/20/2008%2012:00:00%20AM;
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at July 16, 2008 3:40 PM
"What...I don't need a "cut and paste" economics lesson. I've been doing this far longer than you've read about it."
Then why would you move to a hostile environment, when the neighbor don't care for you. Plus that area will fall in a downturn and you will have to sell at a loss.
I hate to break the news to you, lending standards got olot tighter this week! Every Bank and Underwriters know the situation is very bad. I willing to bet every house in America has lost 10% in value this week and thing are not getting better.
"Mutant: of, relating to, or produced by mutation
Mutation: a relatively permanent change in hereditary material involving either a physical change in chromosome relations or a biochemical change in the codons that make up genes
How this relates to Real Estate, I don't know."
Please read this rant by Barry Ritholtz
http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/07/idiots-fiddle-w.html
Idiots Fiddle While Rome Burns
The What
Someday this war is going end..
BTW This house has been on the market since 2005. Every Broker (Including me) had this listing one time or anther.
Posted by: what at July 16, 2008 3:48 PM
Mr. B that listing I just posted should be the HOTD tomorrow...there's an open house Sunday i just realized...incredible property with a 2 car garage...
http://www.corcoran.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&ListingID=1299736&ohDat=7/20/2008%2012:00:00%20AM;
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at July 16, 2008 3:48 PM
I'm drooling over tomorrow's HOTD.
Out of my range, though. That's def a better buy than this one.
Posted by: bayridgegirl at July 16, 2008 4:01 PM
I make no distinction between what and fake what. It's all fake.
Lending standards have gotten tighter? No kidding. Who needs Bloomberg feeds when we have whattard posts.
Posted by: FatLenny at July 16, 2008 4:06 PM
Hey What, how's your SKF holding up today? Wells Fargo upped its dividend and reported better-than-expected earnings. They're actively soliciting new mortgage business. CitiBank reports Fri. What are you predicting?
LEH up 25%, FNM up 31%, C up 13%. DJIA soaring. Oil crashing.
Some day Obama's gonna end this war, unleashing a helluva rally...
Posted by: denton at July 16, 2008 4:11 PM
sorry...SKF -$45.00 -25% today .... dyslexic
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at July 16, 2008 4:19 PM
I was going to buy 5K worth of Citi stock...is it a bad idea?
Posted by: bayridgegirl at July 16, 2008 4:21 PM
Dave, nice catch...I thought it looked backwards.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 16, 2008 4:22 PM
Don't buy C, buy GS
Posted by: FatLenny at July 16, 2008 4:25 PM
bayridgegirl, it would have been a great idea yesterday (as it's up 1.91 today).
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 16, 2008 4:25 PM
Oops, I hit the post too soon. I was going to add to consider a spider instead.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 16, 2008 4:26 PM
C has a higher risk of cutting the dividend
C 7.77% Yield
BAC 11.3% yield
HBC 4.79% yield
WFC 5.0% yield...and just RAISED the dividend today
WFC and HBC are the safest...wait until C and BAC report
What is your time horizon on holding the stock though??? You can still lose money short term. we are not out of the woods yet on this sh!t
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at July 16, 2008 4:27 PM
Agree with Dave. Financials are screwed for at least another 6-12 months. Extremely risky play. That said, GS is coming out of this looking like the only company that hedged and marked appropriately.
Posted by: FatLenny at July 16, 2008 4:32 PM
"Greensperm" - LOL.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 16, 2008 4:41 PM
dave- I really have to defer to Montrose on that one. But you can go to the crowheightsnorth.org website and download the LPC report which has an excellent history of the area and some of the reason wealthy New Yorkers wanted to live here. It seems to have been a number of factors including being close to a rail line that used to run along Fulton, and also the major roadway that eventually became Kings Hwy.
Posted by: bxgrl at July 16, 2008 4:43 PM
Dave, I'm pretty sure that house already was HOTD. I saw it a few weeks ago during an open house. I wouldn't want to live there - very noisy with a bus running by it. Looks better on the outside than the inside although I did like how the staircase was in the bayfront which expanded the sense of space.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 16, 2008 4:48 PM
Brooklynnative, you're absolutely right. I recognized it right away, but cannot seem to find what it was originally listed at.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 16, 2008 4:58 PM
Hey What--when you had this listing (as you say in an earlier comment) what did you offer it at? Better not be anywhere close to this price or you will have been a part of the creation of the mutant bubble.
Posted by: wasder at July 16, 2008 5:02 PM
Wasder - excellent point.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 16, 2008 5:04 PM
Found the 1265 Dean St. Brownstoner link - was an Open House Pick. Not sure if it was ever the HOTD.
http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2008/06/open_house_pick_191.php
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 16, 2008 5:06 PM
Wow it really seems like Dean Street was built for the elite of turn of the century Brooklyn. The architecture of Northern Crown Heights is really something special. I am really surprised that this area of Brooklyn did not gentrify years ago. In any other city on the east cost this area would have would been overrun by yuppies by now like Camden Yards in Baltimore, Adams Morgan Washington DC or Brooklyn Hts...
Posted by: Amzi Hill at July 16, 2008 5:45 PM
Amz Hill...Shhhhh! Don't say gentrication too loud, they might hear. I hope to buy there before that happens.
Architecturally, the area is prime!!
Posted by: bayridgegirl at July 16, 2008 5:54 PM
Dave and all, 1265 Dean is still on the market, they had another open house this last Sunday. I personally think it needs to go down under a million, but whoever buys it will have a really beautiful house on a really beautiful block.
Historically speaking, much of CHN was built as a wealthy suburban enclave. The village of Bedford, and by extension, Bedford Corners, roughly at Bedford and Fulton Street, on up to where the Armory is now, at Bedford/Atlantic, was a stagecoach and freight transportation hub, centrally located between Manhattan and the communities of Long Island. The building of the Bklyn Bridge in 1883, and the Kings County Elevated Railway in 1888 brought wealthy and upper middle class residents to the area. Many of Brooklyn's finest architects and builders built some of their best work here, men like Montrose Morris, Amzi Hill,JC Cady, George B. Chappell and Axel Hedman.
By the end of the 19th Century, many of the huge estates that lined St. Marks Ave had been replaced by upscale apartment buildings, and all of the streets had been filled in with elegant brownstones and limestones, and later, large full scale apt buildings, for the upper middle class residents of the area. A walk down most Crown Heights blocks will still show the many freestanding mansions and fine homes that are still here.
Like most neighborhoods, it's risen, fallen, and is rising again. I'm glad to be here in its renaissance.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 16, 2008 5:56 PM
Dean Street does some have amazing buildings but the problem is you can literally walk just go one block off of it and it changes for the worse dramatically. I wouldn't worry too much about the "secret" getting out. Most people won't want to live there and I see limited upside potential with those huge apartment buildings being so close to Dean.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 16, 2008 5:58 PM
BTW...thanks to all for the investing info.
And I'm long term and cautious...work too hard for my $$...make that only one $.
Posted by: bayridgegirl at July 16, 2008 6:00 PM
Brooklynnative, you certainly have a jaundiced view of the neighborhood. Also your memory is severely flawed. There are no large apartment buildings that close to Dean. The closest are over a block or more away, and very few of them are all that awful. If you are referring to the large apt building across from the side entrance of 1265 Dean, that is a very quiet, very conservative and proper senior residence. The residents there are more likely to go upside your head with a tea cup for even suggesting otherwise.
Not all apartment buildings are filled with the poor or downtrodden, some are co-ops. Don't judge books by their covers, and make assumptions about what you don't know. I live a block away from Dean, and I know what I'm talking about. We're not perfect, but blanket statements like "Most people would not want to live there." are fighting words. That's blatent code leading to tired topics I really don't care to visit tonight.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 16, 2008 6:24 PM
Looking at the influx of new people coming to the neighborhood, I would say you're wrong, Brooklynnative. CHN gets a bad rap from people who don't live here and have probably never set foot here. I'm not saying it doesn't have its problems but this neighborhood has remained fairly stable over the years because not only have many families owned their homes, but it is filled with working families of all income levels. It also has a strong sense of community, and sure some blocks are sketchy, but overall this section, especially in the landmarked area, are great places to live.
I will say this- if you aren't comfortable in mixed neighborhoods, if you aren't comfortable around people who aren't from your income level or background, if you are looking for CHN to become Park Slope, if you want lots of amenities, this isn't the place for you. Not that we don't want amenities (we do, we do!), but CHN and Bed-Stuy have had to fight harder to get them and they are coming, albeit slowly. I've lived here 5 years, and I would never go back to Bklyn Hgts.
Posted by: bxgrl at July 16, 2008 6:25 PM
Brooklynnative I have to disagree with you every brownstone neighborhood in Manhattan has large apartment buildings around the corner. The UWS and UES even Park Slope with the huge buildings on PPW west and 8th ave had no problems with having large buildings close by.
Posted by: Amzi Hill at July 16, 2008 6:35 PM
Montrose: When does your book come out? (I am only half joking.) bxgrl, are you contributing?
MM / bxgrl: What new amenities are coming to this neck of the woods? What avenues seem to be generating the most change? Would love to know.
Thanks.
Posted by: 11233 at July 16, 2008 7:53 PM
"Hey What--when you had this listing (as you say in an earlier comment) what did you offer it at? Better not be anywhere close to this price or you will have been a part of the creation of the mutant bubble."
The people was trying to see this house for 850k in 2005. It was put on the Brooklyn MLS by 2 Brokers, 2 times. At this period of time the price of 850k was too steep. Now they want 1.2 million, yep good luck with that.
I still have access to the Brooklyn MLS.. Plus if you find a Agent or a Broker affiliated with BMLS, they can show you the house and get a spilt of the commission.
http://www.brooklynmls.com/ Access the public side and search.
"Hey What, how's your SKF holding up today? Wells Fargo upped its dividend and reported better-than-expected earnings. They're actively soliciting new mortgage business. CitiBank reports Fri. What are you predicting?
LEH up 25%, FNM up 31%, C up 13%. DJIA soaring. Oil crashing."
Yep Short bus rider, let me help you adjust your helmet. When The Corporations start reporting 2 quarter numbers, they are going to be dreadful! The Financial sector is going to get killed. I hope that no one is long on anything. This is a bear market and you will get vaporized in a instant. Plus this is a nice re entry point for shorting. BTW Citibank, WAMU and Wachovia are insolvent! I suggest you take you money out of there ASAP!
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by: what at July 16, 2008 8:15 PM
this building is landmarked! get ready to open that wallet buying it, converting it to a one-family, and getting lpc approval.
Posted by: aj at July 16, 2008 9:13 PM
Shit. So the What is right. I'm bored.
I'm back to my original contention that getting rid of "guests" meant getting rid of a certain degree of spontaneity, honesty, creativity and drama. And yes, mean nasty little fights I found amusing.
We've also lost easily 75% of the voices and the opinions.
Posted by: Nokilissa at July 16, 2008 9:33 PM
Montrose, maybe it's too late and just I'm fartin into the wind here, but I stand by my comments that "Most people would not want to live there." These aren't "fighting words" but a simple refletion upon reality. Why would the exact same building cost three times more in Brooklyn Heights or Park Slope than Crown Heights? It's because most people, and not just rich whites, but most people prefer the former two neighborhoods to Crown Heights. Most people also prefer Van Gough to me which is why his paintings cost more.
And as for Bxgirl's statement that "if you aren't comfortable in mixed neighborhoods, if you aren't comfortable around people who aren't from your income level or background" this neighborhood is not for you. I see, my criticism of Crown Heights means I might be an elitist or even worse a racist, huh? Well, on the weekends I regularly go for two hour walks - up Third to Prospect Park, cross Flatbush Avenue and then into the Botanical Garden. That's why I love Park Slope it's not because I feel more "comfortable with people from my background." When I moved into this neighborhood years and years ago, it was completely different but it had the Park and the great housing stock. It's an insulting thing for you to say and your assumptions reflect very poorly on you.
Ughh.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 16, 2008 10:25 PM
11233, as the gospel song goes, "change is a-comin'", but realistically, it's going to take a while. Nostrand Ave is our largest and most commercial street. While many progressively minded people have wanted to add some much needed new retail and dining to this block, it is a hard sell. Apparently, most of the commercial buildings are owned by a couple of owners, who probably picked them up for a song in the 70's, when middle class merchants gave up on the area. For whatever reasons, the rents on these spaces, when they become available, are sky high, and the area is frankly, pretty seedy, with notable exceptions, so no one is rushing to be the first to open a better class of restaurant, or a more upscale shop of some kind. I am sure that once someone does, and is successful, the floodgates will open for more. This is not just for newcomers, either. Most people I speak to, from very varied backgrounds, would welcome new businesses. No one is happy with what we have now.
Kingston and Bedford are our other commercial streets. Bedford is getting some interesting movement going, I think it will actually be changing the way Franklin and Classon are changing, and I predict we will be trucking over to Bedford well before Nostrand Ave gets it together.
Kingston has possibilities. The architecture supports the idea of small shops and cafe/restaurants. Unfortunately, there are a lot of abandoned and ill-used apartment buildings on large stretches of Kingston, and until those are rehabbed, big changes are not forthcoming. I do know that a couple of people are planning at least one coffee shop, and perhaps resurrecting the old Kingston Lounge, a wonderful space for a good restaurant to emerge.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 16, 2008 10:45 PM
Montrose Morris I think that you are right about Bedford Ave. I live in Bedford Stuyvesant and I can see Bedford Ave becoming nice on this side of Atlantic also. Grant Sq. can become something really nice. Also L.P Lauritzen 1889 Union League Club that looks a lot like the Montauk Club. Today the Union League Club is a Senior Center that needs to be restored along with most of Grant Sq. This could once again become a very grand intersection of Brooklyn.
Posted by: Amzi Hill at July 16, 2008 11:18 PM
"This is a bear market and you will get vaporized in a instant."
Poof! LOL!
Posted by: DOW8000SP800 at July 16, 2008 11:26 PM
Amzi, I see lots of good things happening on Bedford on your side of Atlantic. I think it will be a very viable location. It's too bad they tore down those great old large mixed use apartment buildings, I think that they could have been rehabbed into really nice new housing. I hope whatever replaces them is not as fugly as further north on Bedford.
I agree about Grant Square, although I think the seniors have a pretty good claim to the Union League Club. I did some research on the building, and it was amazing for its time, and was quite influential in the community. The square must have been something, with the Imperial Apartments, the 23rd Regiment Armory, the Union League Club, and the other grand buildings on the square. Not to mention old Ulysses S. Grant on his horse. The Union League sponsored the statue, btw, as they were a Republican (party of Lincoln) club. Lincoln and Grant are prominantly featured in the terra cotta facade.
I love this stuff - the book is forthcoming.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 17, 2008 12:12 AM
brooklynnative- I was trying to explain the neighborhood, not imply anything about you being elitist or racist. Some people really aren't comfortable in poor, middle or working class ethnic neighborhoods but this is what CHN is largely. It's not for everyone- some people won't like it the way some people don't like the Heights or Park Slope. (I have friends who won't come here because walking down the street makes them nervous. they live on the UES and UWS, and feel out of their element. That's all it is.) Sorry you took it the wrong way but I really wasn't implying either of those things about you..
Posted by: bxgrl at July 17, 2008 12:37 AM
Brooklynnative, I get defensive over "most people would not want to live here" remarks not because it implies that other parts of town are better for whatever reason, but because it implies that there is something so inherently wrong with Crown Heights, that no rational person would want to live here. And that is just not true.
Tonight, after reading your initial remarks, I had to go to a meeting about 6 blocks from this Dean Street house. It was around 6:30, and walking up a very quiet and beautiful NY Ave, past 2 amazing churches just across the street from the Dean St. house I had to laugh at the absurdity of your statement. I saw an interracial couple piling their beautiful kids into a car. I passed two older men who have obviously been here for years having a spirited discussion about rent pricing. Two 20's something white girls were carrying grocery bags into one of those dreaded apartment buidings on NY Ave, and all up and down the avenue people were coming in from work, sitting on their stoops, walking their dogs,and doing everday normal neighborhood stuff. No one looked like they didn't want to be here.
I was tempted to shouts "We are so normal, we are you, we all want the same things. Why is that so hard for people outside of this neighborhood to understand?" Then I went to my community meeting, where we were about the business of improving Crown Heights for everyone.
I think where you live is great. I would love to have Prospect Park, the museum and the Botanic Garden at my door, and great restaurants down the block. But not everyone can live in Park Slope, even if we all could afford it. Crown Heights is a beautiful neighborhood that
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 17, 2008 12:44 AM
is coming back into its own. My vision is a multicultural neighborhood that retains its unique Afro-Caribbean/American culture, and is enriched by the participation and contributions of everyone else who chooses to make it home. The amenities will come, make no mistake, as will the other improvements that are necessary for the betterment of all. Probably never for everyone, and that's just fine. But by no means, not even now, a place that can be classified by anyone as somewhere that "most people would not want to live". Who are most people? If it's not code, then what is?
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 17, 2008 1:24 AM
To clarify: the neighborhood may not be for everyone, I'm not saying that the improvements won't benefit everyone. That is not fine, although probably also true, sadly enough. Our rising tide will not lift all boats, or be appreciated by all, and we must never forget that those concerns need to be addressed, as well.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 17, 2008 1:31 AM
Evening, Montrose.
I finally figured out how to register, although it's a little late to comment on this house.
Anyway, enjoyed its pic and discussion.
For those with doubts, this house looks like it belongs on a block in the South End which when I lived in Boston years ago was to the Back Bay what Crown Heights is to Park Slope today. Now of course, you can't touch places there for less than a couple of million.
I'm really struck by so many people's lack of vision. But then, few people had vision for the South End back in the day.
Anyway, looking forward to the next posting about my boyhood neighborhood, Crown Heights, which has come a long way since my family left in the early 60s.
Nostalgic on Park Avenue
Posted by: NOP at July 17, 2008 1:38 AM
The price will come down on this place sooner or later. It's just a matter of time. Someone will buy it then and it will prove a good investment.
Posted by: White and Proud in Crown Heights at July 17, 2008 7:54 AM
JPM beat the numbers along with WFC yesterday!!!! Sorry, off topic!!
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at July 17, 2008 8:47 AM
"this house looks like it belongs on a block in the South End which when I lived in Boston years ago was to the Back Bay what Crown Heights is to Park Slope today. Now of course, you can't touch places there for less than a couple of million."
Yeah, but that supports my point. Why has everywhere else gentrified already to the extent this house would cost astronomically more if it were situated in the Slope, the Heights, Clinton Hill, Prospect Heights, Cobble Hill, Carrol Gardens, anywhere in Manhattan, etc., etc. Personally, if I were buying, and I was very seriously considering it, my first choice with no serious competition was Stuyvesant Heights , second choice is Crown Heights by Brower Park. I would not buy in Crown Heights on this side of Eastern Parkway. I think the landmark designation has inflated prices way beyond what that immediate neighborhood is worth.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 17, 2008 9:14 AM
Thanks for putting that so beautifully Montrose. CHN will never be Park slope and that's great, really. I'm always amazed at how much of its architectural history has remained intact and how expressive it is. CHN is a very rich neighborhood in terms of that and its people. when I answered Brooklynnative I was using the generic "you" but my point was that neighborhoods have their own personalities.And i will say again it's not for everyone but to paraphrase Montrose, that's just fine.
Posted by: bxgrl at July 17, 2008 9:25 AM
Brooklynnative, you contradict yourself. If you were interested in buying near Brower Park, then you would be buying on the same side of Eastern Parkway as Dean Street and all of the rest of Crown Heights North that you say you would NOT buy in.
I don't think landmarking has had much to do with pricing across the board. There were as many homes listed for over a million before landmarking, which was only last April, as now. I think the high prices reflected the overall inflated prices that all of brownstone Brooklyn suffers from. And for what it's worth, most of those houses were unique - stand alone mansions, or untouched one families, and all were handled by the large firms. The smaller local firms still carry a majority of the average, regular homes that are sold in the area. I have always said that the best way to sustained growth in this community is through sensible pricing.
Posted by: Montrose Morris at July 17, 2008 10:23 AM
Brooklynnative, I'm a bit confused. Your second choice would be Crown Heights by Brower Park, but you then you go on to say that you would not buy in Crown Heights on this side of Eastern Pkwy. Brower Park is on "this" side of Eastern Pkwy. I'm beginning to think that you've never actually step foot in our neck of the woods, yet you're so adamant about how no one really would want to live here!!! Before forming an "opinion" about Crown Heights come visit. Again, as I've stated before, we're not perfect. There are many long time and new residents that care about the future of Crown Heights -- Crow Hill Association, Crown Heights North Association, Crown Heights Revitalization Movement as well as many dedicated block associations. As MM said, Crown Heights has risen, fallen and is rising again. You and your circle of friends don't speak for everyone, and that's apparent when I walk around my neighborhood and see changes, albeit slow, they're coming!!!
Posted by: faithful at July 17, 2008 10:39 AM
Obviously I don't live there and I was confused about the Eastern Parkway thing. I think it's because the Brower Park area has such a different feel than Dean street that I had thought they were further apart than they are. But I've certainly walked around there, ridden my bike there, and have been to plenty of open houses in Crown Heights. In fact, I was the one who pointed out to Dave that the house he likes on Dean had already had an open house and I described the house so I don't think there can be any doubt of whether I've stepped foot in the neighborhood. Just a bit directionally challenged which is nothing new for me. And, no I realize I don't speak for everyone, I don't even speak for my "circle of friends" whatever that means.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 17, 2008 10:56 AM
Don't worry, I'm a bit directionally challenged myself. So you agree that you don't speak for everyone when you stated "Most people would not want to live there." Thanks!!! I have no further questions your Honor. LOL
Posted by: faithful at July 17, 2008 11:38 AM
Yup I don't speak for anyone but me; the market speaks for us all. Most prefer Manhattan to Brooklyn which is why prices are so much higher there. Prices are considerably lower for equivalent housing in Crown Heights than many areas in Brooklyn, but still higher than some areas like East New York for example. Nothing offensive or racist about these observations of facts, but I'm glad you enjoyed a good laugh.
Posted by: Brooklynnative at July 17, 2008 11:53 AM
Brooklynnative:
The South End was riddled with abandoned buildings and rife with crime and drugs when I was a graduate student in Cambridge in the late 70s. (The only reasons friends lived there was because it was dirt cheap.) It took more than twenty years but it's now one of the most expensive areas in Boston.
Crown Heights doesn't have to be one of the most expensive areas in New York City to be vibrant. Physically, it never fell as far as the South End and it may never rise as high in price, but between the two quick drive throughs I've made -- one in the late 90's and one this year -- South-End like signs of improvement are everywhere.
Posters here bemoan the area's shopping streets, the most visible -- and lagging -- signs of progress. But such streets are always the last to improve during urban "gentrification." Columbus Avenue in the South End didn't come back until residential cross streets revived. (And look how long it's taken Park Slope's Fifth Avenue to become a destination street. Maybe newcomers don't realize it, but as someone who's had family in Park Slope for generations, I can tell you: fifty years! It seems less only because it's accelerated in the last few!)
To those who bought and are holding in Crown Heights, congratulations! You already live in one of Brooklyn's handsomest neighborhoods. And there'll be a big upside down the road.
Nostalgic on Park Avenue
Posted by: NOP at July 17, 2008 1:59 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.