« Pratties Have 'Cake-and-Eat-It' Design for Admiral's Row I Hate Valentine's Day Shoots Seemingly Everywhere »
July 18, 2008
Changing of the Guard at The Vermeil
After months of poor sales, the developer of the Vermeil and his in-house brokers (who had originally jumped ship from Brown Harris Stevens to take on this gig) have parted ways. Stepping into the breach: Corcoran. The listing hasn't hit the Corco website yet, but the development's home page shows that seven of the 22 units listed as sold. The priciest apartment still available is a 1,758-square-foot penthouse for $1,850,000. We'll see if the House That Babs Built can do the trick.
First Closing at The Vermeil [Brownstoner] GMAP
Condo of the Day: Price Cut at The Vermeil [Brownstoner]
Update on the Vermeil [Brownstoner]
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/5554
Comments
I think they've done a nice job with this building. It seems solid. The prices always seemed a bit high to me, and it's too bad they didn't get more sold before the slowdown. They seem like nice, large family-sized apartments with terrific train access (2/3 and Q) within a couple blocks. I think they also have in house parking, but don't quote me on that.
The copper on the side of the building looks really nice (can't see it from this picture).
They need to clean up the front, add some trees in containers or something and a nice, big light fixture. It's not helping sales that the front area still looks like a construction site, even though the majority of the work has been completed for a few months now.
Some curb appeal would go a long way, I think.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 10:16 AM
I don't like the proximity to Flatbush (although you do have 7th Avenue right there) and ideally would prefer something slightly south. But I found the developer's website is refreshingly very well done, having recently seen some others, which were quite pathetic.
Is the one outside pic on the website the building across the street from The Vermeil? If that's the case, it seems odd to include that without any pictures of the The Vermeil itself.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 18, 2008 10:33 AM
When you first click on the website, those pictures are of the Vermeil, but in the actual photo gallery, there are no photos of the building itself. I think that website was around before the building was completed, thus the lack of photos.
That is a shot of the building across the street in the gallery...so that would be someone's view.
Flatbush seems to have gotten a lot nicer along that stretch in the past year or two. Franny's is right there practically around the corner, as is American Apparel in the opposite direction, there's a new (nice looking) restaurant going in now literally across from 7th Avenue on the PH side of Flatbush which looks nice, there's a new women's clothing store on that block of Flatbush as well...there really seems to be an effort to upscale Flatbush in this area and I'm seeing pretty big changes in a short amount of time. I think I remember reading that the Pintchik Hardware guys own a lot of these buildings along Flatbush and are in the process of turning them more upscale.
It's not the most serene location, no, but it feels urban while being very close to Grand Army Plaza and Prospect Park. Perhaps those willing to pay these prices (Manhattanites) will appreciate the slightly more diverse nature and hustle and bustle that this part of Park Slope provides. I'm also guessing that when they show up with Corcoran, there will be a price chop in order.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 10:43 AM
not my cup of tea design-wise but i have no beef with it. i hope it will sell though because it does provide some much needed family-szied apartments in the area.
Posted by: This Aint No Disco at July 18, 2008 10:48 AM
Thanks 11217. I hope Flatbush continues along the path it's on, although, given the economy, that will be a challenge. I have the same concerns with Atlantic Street, which has been going through a wonderful transformation that has included the addition of many nice shops, many of which are mom and pops.
This Aint No Disco, the apartments seem nice to me from the pics, but I have to wonder why these have been sitting on the shelf so long, given the demand for family-sized apartments you mentioned. And, yes, the market may have slowed, but these have been listed for quite some time. They didn't seem outrageously priced when first listed and such apartments seem to turn over relatively quickly in PS.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 18, 2008 11:00 AM
the newer building across the street is much nicer looking. Also I would have to say the area of park slope along Flatbush ave is the best part.
Posted by: Santa at July 18, 2008 11:04 AM
I think they were overpriced from the start. They started over 2 million. I'm sure that's the primary reason why they didn't/aren't selling.
Santa - You're kidding, right? The building across from here is known by many to be atrocious. Are you referring to the one with the faux cuppola on top (looks so bad!), the brick which has all that white stuff leaking out and the dead plants in the front??
I've never heard anyone say they like the look of that place. I think it's one of the only eyesores in the North Slope, in fact.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 11:12 AM
It might be interesting to note that in Argentina...especially in Buenos Aires...that after the almost complete collapse of their economy in 2001 and the devaluation of their currency, retail has THRIVED ever since.
People there no longer have as much faith in the banking system keeping their money safe, and they seem to spend and live life as if every day is their last.
I am always amazed how one can walk down a beautiful boulevard in Buenos Aires, see 100 womens shoe stores in a mile, all packed with gorgeous ladies buying shoes like it's their job.
The discos and bars are packed, the restaurants are filled and everyone seems to be having a great time, despite their financial situation there.
Perhaps a little of that might rub off on us during this rough time. I personally hope so...
Sorry, I know that had nothing to do with the Vermeil.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 11:17 AM
@11217: There is a parking garage under the building.
Posted by: slopestoner at July 18, 2008 11:22 AM
Thanks Slopestoner. I thought so.
I think the area with the copper covering it on the Sterling side is where you enter the garage. I can kinda picture it now...
I'm also curious if anyone has any information on the former Brothel turning condo on Lincoln Place right behind the Brooklyn Conservatory...
I walked by and they look to be moving fast now and doing an incredible job on the renovation. Nice windows, new copper front entrance, they seemed to be already plastering and painting the interiors from what I can tell. Also looks like there might be a nice garden to the side where it separates from the Bk Conservatory.
Perhaps you can do a little investigating for us Brownstoner on when they might start selling those?
I've had my eye on that place...
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 11:27 AM
When we walked past there about two months ago, several bricks had fallen out of the facade. The problem has been fixed, but that, to me, does not bode well for the overall quality of the construction.
Posted by: Florence Castleberry at July 18, 2008 11:29 AM
Santa...please! You think it's nicer than say 3rd Street between 6th Avenue and the PPW?? Yowsa.
11217, maybe nothing to do with the Vermeil, but very interesting insight. And I think there is lots one can learn from South Americans about enjoying life.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 18, 2008 11:29 AM
Santa...please! You think it's nicer than say 3rd Street between 6th Avenue and the PPW or any of the many other beautiful blocks south of there?
11217, maybe that post had nothing to do with the Vermeil, but it was a very interesting insight. And I think there is lots one can learn from South Americans about enjoying life.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 18, 2008 11:30 AM
Oops, sorry for the double post.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 18, 2008 11:31 AM
"When we walked past there about two months ago, several bricks had fallen out of the facade. The problem has been fixed, but that, to me, does not bode well for the overall quality of the construction."
Those bricks had not fallen out of the facade. A few were left out like that to put in an outdoor light fixture. It is now installed, although something larger would have been more appropriate for the scale of the building.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 11:33 AM
The copper facade on the Vermeil is already bleeding green rain stripes into the concrete. Stupid design.
I laugh everytime I walk past the building and see the name: VERMEIL. Who'd want to spend over a mil to live in a building named after faux gold-plate jewelry?
Answer: People too stupid to know what "vermeil" means!
Posted by: WonTon at July 18, 2008 11:41 AM
For a new construction, I think it looks really nice. Not like so much of the fugly, craptastic architecture that seems to be sprouting up all over Brooklyn.
Posted by: GHB at July 18, 2008 11:43 AM
Yes, by all means, let's take our economic advice from Argentina.
Posted by: SnarkSlope at July 18, 2008 11:43 AM
WonTon, what happened to your accent? ;-)
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 18, 2008 11:44 AM
By the way, don't give Pintchik credit for the nice retail on those blocks. That stretch--with Hootie Coture, the new restaurant, Slope Heights realty and the little cafe is owned by a smaller landlord, a father-daughter team. They're long-time neighborhood landlords, supportive of small business, and that's why that block or two always has lots of cute little stores.
Pintchik, OTOH, owns the block with the Blockbuster. The buzz is that he wants to tear down those buildings and put in a big-box.
Posted by: WonTon at July 18, 2008 11:45 AM
Oh, 11217. You seem to know quite a bit about this building. A whole lot.
Posted by: Florence Castleberry at July 18, 2008 11:46 AM
SnarkSlope, I knew that was coming but I don't think that was 11217's point. I think s/he was pointing out that a slowed economy does not necessarily mean as severe a slowdown in retail as we might expect.
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 18, 2008 11:47 AM
*Vermeil, sometimes called silver gilt, is a combination of sterling silver, gold, and other precious metals.
I think given that the building sits on Sterling Place, the name is quite appropriate. And a helluva lot better than most building names I've seen.
BTW, those green stripes would come off in a power washing, so while I agree it might not have been the best design choice, it's also not the end of the world.
This also is the site of the horrible 1960 plane crash, so I like to respect this corner for the history it provides.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 11:47 AM
Biff, that was the other WonTon. I'm the fake--uh, vermeil-- WonTon today.
Posted by: WonTon at July 18, 2008 11:47 AM
I liked the Vermeil when I looked at it. They are selling real aparments that I could live in with my family, not crappy little 2-beds that are being sold as 3-beds. They are definitely overpriced. Also, the history of the location kind of creeps me out. I could actually imagine myself picking up one of those apartments if prices come down 20% or so.
Posted by: lechacal at July 18, 2008 11:49 AM
WonTon, touche...that was good!
Posted by: Biff Champion at July 18, 2008 11:51 AM
"The buzz is that he wants to tear down those buildings and put in a big-box."
This might be true, and while a big box, the son told me he wants a Restoration Hardware or something of that sort where the Blockbuster is. I don't think too many in this area would complain about THAT big box.
Yes, Florence...I do know a lot about the building I suppose. I'm observant, I walk by it a couple times a day and I sometimes talk to construction workers when new buildings/stores are opening up.
If you're trying to link me with this property in any fashion other than an interested neighborhood resident, you are barking up the wrong tree.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 11:54 AM
11217 sez
"This also is the site of the horrible 1960 plane crash, so I like to respect this corner for the history it provides."
Oh, I see. Yes, a luxury condo development is EXACTLY THE THING to memorialize one of the worst air disasters in U.S. history...and the deaths of hundreds of people.
Damn, wish I'd thought of that.
Posted by: WonTon at July 18, 2008 11:55 AM
"Worst air disaster in U.S. history?" Pass the blunt, dude. I bet this isn't even in the top 10 by casualties.
Posted by: lechacal at July 18, 2008 11:57 AM
I didn't say that a luxury apartment was the BEST way to memorialize anything, Wonton. But seeing that you didn't buy the property and erect your own multi-million dollar tree and waterfall studded memorial to the deceased, how about we try to live with it and make the most of it, eh?
I don't plan to be criticized for being a glass half full person, when it seems many people on this blog actually ENJOY finding things to complain about.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 12:00 PM
I'd probably say that September 11th was the worst air disaster in U.S. history, but what do I know.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 12:00 PM
If you can lay off the weed long enough to check it out, lechacal:
http://www.planecrashinfo.com/worst100.htm
The Sterling Place crash is #83 of the WORST AIR DISASTERS OF ALL TIME in the WORLD
Posted by: WonTon at July 18, 2008 12:05 PM
http://www.planecrashinfo.com/worst100.htm
Looks like it is the 6th worst U.S. air disaster and the 83rd worst air disaster worldwide...
And the plane didn't actually land here at Sterling and 7th, but it crashed nearby and some of the wreckage spilled onto this corner.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 12:07 PM
I would never buy the Vermeil. Too many ghosts on that corner. In Hong Kong, no Chinese person would go near such a building. We would rent it out at high prices to clueless gwailos.
Posted by: WonTon at July 18, 2008 12:10 PM
We just found and linked the same thing, Wonton.
http://www.usemenow.com/web-log/archives/2005/10/park_slope_plan.html
Just found this, which is a great picture of this corner...
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 12:10 PM
11217 - if you're saying that a construction worker on site at the Vermeil told you personally that they left a hole in the masonry specifically to accommodate a light fixture, I have no reason not to believe you. How that would work, exactly, is a mystery to me, given that there is not now in that spot a light fixture, and it appeared to me as I walked past the building to the Q train - a common occurrence for me - that there were no other spots with bricks simply "left out" of the facade. There was a hole in the building and now there is a very obvious patch where that hole used to be. Lots of buildings have outdoor light fixtures without obvious patches in the building's exterior, wouldn't you agree?
For almost $1000 a square foot, as friends who viewed a dark, ground floor unit can attest, I would expect better forethought and execution. I suspect that might have something to do with why Manhattanites are not jumping at the chance to live a stone's throw from Flatbush Avenue in the lap of "luxury" in yet another cookie-cutter condo.
Posted by: Florence Castleberry at July 18, 2008 12:14 PM
"I would never buy the Vermeil. Too many ghosts on that corner."
You might want to move to the moon then, Wonton.
Between the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, the slautering of the American Indians and years of 2000 plus murders a year, there are probably very few places in this city (or anywhere for that matter) where something horrible hasn't happened in years past.
You are commenting on the intelligence of people who would buy the Vermeil based on the name, and I could say the same about people who live their lives based on silly superstitions.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 12:15 PM
Florence, it was my understanding that originally they were planning to install a large sconce-like light fixture where that hole was and in the end cheaped out, put in the way too small light they have now and patched the hole. This building, as you probably know took FOREVER to build, so I'm sure there have been issues along the way.
It made sense to me.
I'm not saying this is the creme de la creme, but I do think it's nice and better than most new construction I've seen. It fits with the surroundings, has a cornice, has a few nice details and has large apartments. People spend far more and get far less in this city, that's all I'm saying.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 12:20 PM
@Florence Castleberry: $1000/sf is outrageous, and I'm sure Corcoran realizes that. The reality is that these apts are selling for much less than that.
Full disclosure: I bought an apt. in the building, so take my comments w/ a grain of salt.
Posted by: slopestoner at July 18, 2008 12:28 PM
Dear 11217--I give you this important number:
1-888-NO GHOST
It is the cell phone of my cousin, the 24-hour emergency Feng Shui master.
He can help you and your other six neighbors in the Vermeil. Those bloodcurdling screams at midnight can't be helping you sleep!
Posted by: WonTon at July 18, 2008 12:34 PM
I would never live in the Vermeil, Wonton. I'm a prewar brownstone guy all the way.
But I do have the capacity to look at other things and comment on them.
You should try it sometime.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 12:38 PM
I don't know much about metals fine or faux, but I do know that every time I read or hear "Vermeil," I immediately think of "Shlemiel! Shlimazel! Hasenpfeffer Incorporated!"
Big ups to my favorite TV show as a kid.
Sorry to those of you for whom the name "Vermeil" may now be ruined.
Posted by: lucille at July 18, 2008 12:39 PM
Welcome to the neighborhood Slopestoner. Hope you're enjoying it thus far. Tried Olive Vine, Chiles and Chocolate and La Taq yet? All right down the block from you on 7th...
The lentil soup at Olive Vine is the best I've had! Great hummus too.
Not sure what your log in name is referring to, but if you ever need a smokin' buddy, let me know...
;-)
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 12:46 PM
I hear you, 11217. You're right - the building took forever to build, there are no doubt interesting, shall we say, structural and design decisions as a result, and now the brokers who left BHS specifically to rep this thing are off the job, and Corcoran has swooped in to pick up the slack. None of this inspires confidence. And, for that reason, I can't agree that a Manhattanite would get more bang for less buck buying in this place rather than in Manhattan. You can buy a pre-war place in Manhattan for 1.7 - maybe it won't be as large, but then you're pretty much assured your property value will remain stable and increase over time because Brooklyn isn't Manhattan, and Flatbush isn't 7th Avenue. Sure, the creep has happened and keeps happening, but Flatbush is a major traffic thoroughfare and will be indefinitely. If what you want is "luxury" - because that's what they're promising - then I don't understand what's "luxurious" about the Vermeil outside of Italian tile and SubZero appliances. And how much extra are we talking for a parking space in the garage? I'm cranky over all of this, I admit, because I'm not a fan of most of the new construction around Brooklyn in general, and this place, though cosmetically a better fit for the neighborhood, just smells like a potential money pit to me.
Posted by: Florence Castleberry at July 18, 2008 12:50 PM
ha I rent from the "father/daughter" team someone was speaking of that own all the property on flatbush. Interesting people to say the least.
also this building is uglier than the one on the other side of sterling. The copper is pretty dumb looking.
Posted by: Santa at July 18, 2008 1:37 PM
I think it comes down to the fact that $1.8 is highly unrealistic. In fact, I dont even think they are in the ballpark.
Viable alternatives at a similar price point:
1. A nice brownstone which includes some rental income.
2. The high end Meier building on Grand Army.
Posted by: slick at July 18, 2008 4:59 PM
I think it comes down to the fact that $1.8 is highly unrealistic. In fact, I dont even think they are in the ballpark.
Viable alternatives at a similar price point:
1. A nice brownstone which includes some rental income.
2. The high end Meier building on Grand Army.
Posted by: slick at July 18, 2008 5:00 PM
I'd probably prefer the Meier building also if I was into new construction, but I believe the 3 bedrooms there are about 500K - 1 million more than these, so that's not really a good comparison.
A brownstone on one of these North Slope blocks will run around 3 million, so also not the best comparison.
These are not for people who want to own an old house. I don't think the buyers are the same. Some people want to live in Park Slope, but have no interest in maintaining a 100 year old house.
That said, I think if they priced these around 1.4 or so, they'd get a few more bites.
Posted by: 11217 at July 18, 2008 6:10 PM
good website?!!
Stupid music, takes forever to load, MAXIMIZES the browser (fu, leave my browser alone,) unreadable by eyes over 50 (white on black!), unreadable dimensions on fps, etc etc etc....
Posted by: cmu at July 18, 2008 7:01 PM
Oh my gosh, what's the debate. They're overpriced, period. That's the one and only reason these aren't selling.
It's well designed and very well located. Flatbush or the plane crash are not why these units aren't selling. They're not selling because they cost too much for how much space you get especially in the combined living room/dining room/kitchen area which is small. I looked at the model unit when we were weighing whether to buy a larger condo or a house. We chose a house.
Posted by: traditionalmod at July 20, 2008 11:14 AM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.