« Development Watch: 307 Atlantic Avenue, Post Demo House of the Day: 520 11th Street »
June 10, 2008
110 Amity: LPC Says Yes to Lamm, No to Townhouses

The LPC is putting Time Equities through its paces when it comes to the developer's plans to redevelop Cobble Hill's Lamm Building and construct townhouses on adjacent land. Less than two weeks ago, Community Board 6's landmarks/land-use committee unanimously approved Time Equities' rejiggered proposal for the development at a meeting that took place with almost no public notice. This morning, however, the LPC told the firm that while it has made big strides with its design, the five proposed townhouses "still need some rethinking." The LPC disapproved an earlier iteration of the plans in January. A spokesperson for the LPC tells us the following: the commissioners "felt that a harmonious balance between contemporary and historic design elements had not quite been achieved with respect to the townhouse facades. For example, one commissioner noted that the townhouse doorways were the same, whereas the doorways to the historic buildings elsewhere in the district were all different. Another commissioner said the modern cornice ought to be a strong, steel sculptural form, and another said that the use of two different railings on the exterior staircases was confusing. Another said the lintels and cornice were too flat, making the facades seem stark." The commissioners did, however, approve Time Equities' proposed changes to the Lamm building, which mainly involve placing a penthouse addition on its roof. The firm is being urged to work with LPC staff before submitting a new proposal.
110 Amity Proposal Takes a Drubbing at LPC Hearing [Brownstoner]
Cobble Hill Association: 110 Amity Plan ‘Unacceptable’ [Brownstoner] GMAP
Opposition to 110 Amity Plans Grows [Brownstoner]
CB6 Tries to Avoid Amity Street Horror [Brownstoner]
Photos of renderings from Gowanus Lounge.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/5164
Comments
All you have to do is look up the word "arbitrary" in the dictionary, and you will see a photo of Robert B. Tierney. Geesh.
Posted by: guest at June 10, 2008 1:33 PM
Are those white boxes the town houses? Kind of a bizarre way to sell "appropriateness". Usually you want to show how you fit in, not the opposite.
Posted by: WBer at June 10, 2008 1:49 PM
Did the mayor fire the rest of the commissioners? 1:33's comment is assinine.
Posted by: guest at June 10, 2008 2:24 PM
1:49- Those seem to be just the shapes, not the design of the townhouses. There is an earlier post that shows more detail. Im pretty sure they are basic brick townhouses. I guess that its in order to highlight the changes to the historic building or somehow differentiate the project's phases.
Posted by: madman at June 10, 2008 11:21 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.