« Development Watch: Law High School in Order on Adams House of the Day: 274 Clinton Street »
April 10, 2008
Co-op of the Day: 469 Eastern Parkway

This one-bedroom at 469 Eastern Parkway in Crown Heights is a beautiful, generously-sized apartment. Unfortunately, we don't think the days of a $400,000 one-bedroom (okay, $399,000 in this case) are here yet. After eight weeks on the market, the price was just shaved by $11,000 and we suspect it has further to go. That said, it'll make someone very happy some day. What do you think of the layout?
469 Eastern Parkway [Douglas Elliman] GMAP P*Shark
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/4457
Comments
bootiful. price is too high though.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 12:58 PM
$400k for a 1 bdrm in Crown Hghts. Keep chopping still has a ways to go
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 12:59 PM
I think the layout is unusual. Somewhat impractical.
Posted by: Hal at April 10, 2008 1:03 PM
Tear down the walls to the bedroom and combine it with the lr as a large lr/dr, make the dr the br. Reverse the fixtures in the bath somehow to move the door to face the lr. After $100k rennovation, you have a nice $300k apt.
Posted by: LM at April 10, 2008 1:10 PM
is there any precedent for a $400K in this neighborhood? the location is great, i currently live nearby, but i don't recall this kind of prices even 3 years ago...
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 1:17 PM
I don't mind the layout too much, but the price is way out of bounds.
What's a realistic price? $250k?
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 1:24 PM
I saw the same: Remove bedroom walls.
But this space is big as it is. When bedroom walls are removed, you would have light from 2 windows coming into this space ( plus kitchen window). you would have about 20X20 sf and dining alcove in front of the kitchen. Pretty decnt size for the living room.
Remove those beautiful wood doors between former living and dining, close opening.
Reuse doors and surround. Build frame at the entrance from foyer to this new living room mirroring window angle.
2 windows and enough of the wall space for your furniture, bookshelves, etc.
You have big living room and two big bedrooms.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 1:28 PM
Lets check back on this in 3 mths time and see how much it has been chopped. I saw offer $250k
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 1:48 PM
$712 maintenance is a tough monthly nut for location, space, etc. One block off of Washington in CH/PH on Eastern Parkway may command $399K for a superlative 1 BR, but not yet here.
Posted by: Fjorder at April 10, 2008 2:12 PM
"is there any precedent for a $400K in this neighborhood?"
There is precedent for 400k, except it's for houses in this neighborhood, not 1BR apts.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 2:17 PM
I can't help it, listings like this make me smug about the $230K prewar co-op I just bought in Kensington/Ditmas - it is the same size as this listing, and needed no work. I moved from the PH/CH area b/c the prices were getting so out-of-whack. The museum, BBG, etc will still be there when I need them. I'll take more space at a fraction of the price.
Posted by: dpbuyer at April 10, 2008 2:21 PM
"One block off of Washington in CH/PH on Eastern Parkway may command $399K for a superlative 1 BR, but not yet here."
Except this is 4-5 blocks off of Washington.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 2:23 PM
You can get a 1 bedroom in Prime Park Slope for this amount.
I would not pay more than 225K for this place with that kind of maint.
With mortgage and maint, we are talking almost $3,000 a month. Who would pay such an absurd price to live here?
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 2:43 PM
According to Property Shark, there was a unit in the same building that sold in this past January for $410,000. There was a unit that sold in August of last year for $392,000. Another in May of last year $427,000. Then there is a unit in the building next door to this one (465 Eastern Parkway) that sold for $392,000 in January of this year.
Of course, there is no indication what size these units are, but its probably safe to guesstimate 1,000 square feet since that seems to be a pretty common size for pre-war units.
Based on this, I think the price per square foot is probably on the high side. Maybe $350,000 would be more reasonable.
Posted by: Wont UB My Nabor at April 10, 2008 2:58 PM
I'd rather buy a studio in a nicer neighborhood.
For $3000 a month, you could rent in the West Village or Soho. You do realize that, right?
Absurd pricetag. Those people who paid anywhere near 400K for a 1 bedroom in Crown Heights are real suckers.
You could buy an entire house for 400K in that neighborhood 5 years ago. Maybe two of them.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 3:06 PM
I'm not of the "one should always buy, buy, buy" contingent, but it does seem to me that what one could buy something for 5 years ago is never really relevant to the decision of whether to buy something at a given price now.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 3:14 PM
I don't know this neighborhood and don't care much about the market there but I had to laugh at the ridiculous comment that 3:06 just made...."You could buy an entire house for 400K in that neighborhood 5 years ago. Maybe two of them."
Duh, everywhere in the world prices were lower 5 years ago...insightful!!!
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at April 10, 2008 3:18 PM
In 2006, a 2 bedroom in the same building was featured as a co-op of the day: http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2006/09/coop_of_the_day_12.php
If I remember correctly, it had an asking price in the mid to upper $400K. While people criticized the neighborhood, no one seemed to have an issue with the asking price. Has that much changed in 1 1/2 years? Or are two bedrooms really worth that much more than one?
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 3:22 PM
You can get a 1 bedroom in Prime Park Slope for this amount.
another foolish "guest" statement. seriously, you're insane in the membrane if you truly believe this.
Posted by: Fjorder at April 10, 2008 3:27 PM
listing has it at 900 sq ft which works out to $433/ft. I think this is very much in line for that neighborhood.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 3:44 PM
I'd rather take this place. Smaller, but with a garden in a location 100 times better.
http://www.corcoran.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&ListingID=1189980
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 3:52 PM
Brownstoner:
(I hope that there aren't multiples of this post. I keep getting the message that your server doesn't open. Or don't you accept notes from Manhattan?)
I wouldn't know comparable co-op prices in Crown Heights, where I lived as a boy in the 1950s, but I can say that this building is typical of the middle-class apartment houses found throughout the neighborhood.
When you're young, places like this seem as big as palaces; when your older you recognize them for what they were (and are): better versions of ordinary tenements found throughout the city, a step up for aspiring middle-class people between World Wars I and II.
My family's building was very similar to this one: deep, cool, and pleasant to live in. I suspect that the unit posted here was carved from a much bigger apartment, probably after the Depression, because the two "formal" rooms at the front are disproportionately sized for a one-bedroom, and because the kitchen is in an odd spot for such a plan. Bourgeois apartments like this had bigger kitchens with pantries, dumbwaiters, and often breakfast nooks. In this case, the kitchen may have taken a good part of the bedroom, with a string of bedrooms (as many as three or four) following it.
Our apartment extended from street to courtyard, with a dining room and living room the same size and arrangement as the ones here. A long hall connected to three bedrooms and an intervening, old-fashioned bathroom with a claw-footed tub, pedestal sink, and black and white hexagonal tiles. Such an apartment was perfect for a family, with plenty of room to sprawl around and enough space for the kids to keep out of their parents' way.
If WontUBMyNeighor (2.58pm) is correct about prices, the middle class is returning to Crown Heights, although I hope it's not just single people buying one bedrooms but also those with kids who find bigger units in buildings that were designed and built for families. In their original configurations and with original details, these rival any new condo, even if you have to walk flights of stairs. (which we used as play spaces when it rained outside -- "Slinky," jacks, marbles, hide-and-seek).
Nostalgic On Park Avenue
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 4:37 PM
Fjorder please see listing at 3:52pm which is for a 1 bdrm in prime park slope with a garden for 399k. Now who is the foolish guest?
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 4:47 PM
wow. i stand corrected. it's a rarity, but there it is, a 1 BR in prime park slope for $399K.
Posted by: Fjorder at April 10, 2008 4:53 PM
I could find you 5 other listings in Prime Park Slope for 400K.
Which is why this apartment is so ridiculously overpriced.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 4:57 PM
Slap two walk-in closets together, throw in access to some flowers and its viable apartment for $399,000. Go figure!
Posted by: Wont UB My Nabor at April 10, 2008 4:57 PM
pretty crappy 1-BR, it's half under ground so gets very little light the bedroom only has a door/window to an alley way for light and air.
Total square footage looks to be about 400 ft so close to $1000/ft to live underground. Sure the location is great and there's a garden but some people would prefer to have the room and light for their money.
It's really not an apples to apples comparison in any way.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 8:28 PM
I thought the walls should come down as well. A quicker fix could be to extend the kitchen to the wall of the dinning room to add storage and counter space. IF you have a dinning room, you don't need a breakfast table in the kitchen area, unless you incorporate some seating in the extended counter space.
Looks like they use either the dinning room or living room as a bedroom, as the bed can be seen behind the double doors.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 11:40 PM
That Park Slope building needs some serious work on the outside. I walk past there frequently. That maintenance doesn't include the work that will eventually have to be done to fix the outside.
And the place itself is a small underground railroad apartment (No pun intended!). No thanks.
Posted by: guest at April 10, 2008 11:46 PM
Soo Many interior designers/visonaries for this apt. Can someone give me some idea for my unfinish cellar?
Posted by: guest at April 11, 2008 12:06 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.