« Condos of the Day: 424 Lafayette Avenue StreetLevel: Papa John’s Comes to Northern 4th Ave. »

January 10, 2008

House of the Day: 679 St. Marks Avenue

679-St-Marks-Avenue-0108.jpg
This one's not for the faint of heart. This one-time beauty queen at 679 St. Marks Avenue in Crown Heights is ready for a gut and asking $400,000 for the privilege. This is priced at about $80 per buildable square foot. (The house is only 2,700 square feet but the 2.43 FAR allows for another 2,300 square feet to be built.) Is this a good deal? If you think you could condo it and sell the finished square feet for, say, $450 a foot, there's gotta be some room for profit in the equation, don't you think?
679 St. Marks Avenue [Douglas Elliman] GMAP P*Shark




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/3466

Comments

Wouldn't this have listed at twice the price last year?

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 2:24 PM

itll sell for 300k. Has some major cracks in the foundation and rear wall will prob have to be rebuilt. Its surrounded by SRO rooming houses with some very special uhhm "characters"

Posted by: MrHancock at January 10, 2008 2:31 PM

If this is in the landmarked section of Crown heights, than that FAR is worthless.

Can you get a mortgage for this?

What's wrong with Characters?

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 2:39 PM

I think Corcoran could list it easily for say...2.4 mil?

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 2:49 PM

2.4M....And we'll all come on here and say it's overpriced and Park Slope is the best neighborhood.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 2:53 PM

Why is everything a condo conversion, Brownstoner?! Jeez. Keep the crappy condos on 4th Avenue in Park Slope where they belong.

Just becasue the FAR allows for more doesn't mean the buyer HAS to use it.

I hope the buyer keeps the building intact and lives in the building (owner-occupied).

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:01 PM

Corcoran can price it at $4 million and move it to Carroll Gardens, now the most expensive nabe in Brooklyn after Brooklyn Heights!

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:05 PM

Not in the landmarked section of Crown Heights. If it was it would probably be listed for more.

http://ci.nyc.ny.us/html/lpc/html/maps/maps_bklyn.shtml

So basically you can buy it and add an ugly glass tower on top and do a curb cut and get a garage on the 1st floor....GO, developers.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:06 PM

It's 16' wide.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:07 PM

It might help sell the house if it was listed:

This house is on the border of the border of Caroll Gardens.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:08 PM

This house was already auctioned off in 2005. BTW, a close-up of the picture on Property Shark reveals just how bad this facade really looks. It's a shell.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:10 PM

If you use the extra 2300 sq. ft. FAR and only do a 12x10 room, you can add an additional 19 floor. Maybe you can then have a view of Park Slope, the best neighborhood.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:12 PM

poor li'l house

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:13 PM

I think it's a tear-down.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 3:19 PM

the broker said it is a "beautiful jewel," so it must be great!

Posted by: z at January 10, 2008 5:12 PM

If this was in move in condition and dripping with detail, the price would be about right for this neighborhood with 'characters'.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 5:55 PM

I dont know about the house but I find Barbara Brown Agent Deeeeeeelicious!

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 6:35 PM

Brownstoner:

The photos posted at Corcoran for this property remind me of the special places backyards and St. Marks Avenue held for kids growing up in Crown Heights in the 1950’s.

While we shared streets and sidewalks with adults, backyards (and courtyards) belonged to us. There was an alternative way of moving through the neighborhood back then: the adjoining courts and yards that were connected by gaps in fences where we squeezed ourselves traveling between friends’ houses or out-of-the-way places to play stickball, handball, and punch ball. (Kids were skinny then – Cokes came in six-ounce glass bottles, enough refreshment for the whole day! – so it was never a problem climbing under, over, or between fences.)

My family’s apartment overlooked both the street and courtyard, and the view to neighboring row houses was very similar to the one shown on the Corcoran site. Brownstone in front, the backs of these houses were brick, and washed in different color paints that gave them a very appealing look. Vines and flowers climbed up the walls and over weather-beaten wood fences. But their aesthetic was less important than the opportunities they gave us to play.

People moving to suburbs at the time said they were doing so for the kids (as they do to this day), overlooking the ability of kids to make a play world from the city's nooks and crannies. Differences in property elevations were shored up by retaining walls that we crossed like acrobats (developing our balance and motor skills); there were telephone poles to climb; service alleys and ramps to ride our bicycles; and concrete yards to play ball. (This was mostly a boys’ world, but there were also girls – mostly sisters of my friends – who came along, jumping rope, playing hop scotch.)

And there was also the mild thrill of doing something illicit. These were private spaces and we were trespassing, testing our bravery against the possibility of an angry owner, superintendent, (or worse) dog. For the most part, though, there was a tacit understanding of the rules: we weren’t to make too much noise; we weren't to cuss (that was for the street); and we weren’t to hang out past twilight (or until some elderly crank threw a pot of water on our heads!)

Many of Crown Heights’ apartment houses had “servants’ entrances” through the basements, and these made gateways to our play spaces. Somehow we knew which block had a game going that day, and would slip through these passages one-by-one until we made up teams, playing for hours. Again, there was the thrill of trespassing, sliding by the “keep out” signs, down dark steps, and over metal trash cans (remember those?) and into the bright light of the courtyard.

Mid-blocks were also places to misbehave. Eat ice cream before dinner out of sight of our parents. Play with matches. Experiment with making out.

We were better behaved in the town house gardens, of course. We might zip through on our way to our pals, but when we lingered, it was because we were invited. Play dates. Birthday parties. The occasional garden party under a tent.

St. Marks Avenue was (and probably still is) one of the most impressive streets in the neighborhood, but also good for kids. Here it was possible to stay a whole day. Ride a bike around the service ways, garages, and parking lots of the big apartment houses. Hit the Brooklyn Children’s Museum in Brower Park (back then consisting of two free-standing Victorian mansions with lots of menageries and hands-on exhibits). Play in the park, watched over by the “matrons” (parks department employees in crisp white uniforms – do they still have them in NYC playgrounds?). Check out books in the new public library between Nostrand and New York Avenues, a functional, modernist building that (sadly) replaced one the street’s great mansions. (I much preferred the Brooklyn Public Library's Bookmobile that used to pull up at Brower Park. It was cramped but happy, its arrival always eagerly anticipated, a long line of kids waiting at the corner to peruse its children’s section.) And on the way home, scour the shelves in the toy shop between St. Marks and Bergen and maybe getting an ice cream at a "fountain" nearby.

Although there were six-story elevator apartment houses with doormen on St. Marks (where men in suits and hats took their hats off when a lady got on the elevator), there were still a number of old architectural beauties left. These were mansions as big as or bigger than any in Clinton Hill or Park Slope. Set far back from the street and with side yards, they were handy for the occasional punch ball game. One of them was full of kids and may have been an orphanage or foster home. We never asked questions, just played ball. (These places are gone now, I understand, with bits of them tossed around the garden at the Brooklyn Museum.)

The house posted today is between Nostrand and Bedford, which I recall as lined with brownstones similar to it. There were few kids living on that stretch in my time, so I never got to know it. But it seems good for a family who’d like Brower Park, the Children’s Museum, and a handy public library. And maybe the kids will make their own kids-only maps of Crown Heights, the way we did back in the day.

Nostalgic on Park Avenue
(BCHM: Back to Crown Heights Movement)

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 7:55 PM

NOP, you have to stop. You are making me daydream about my own childhood and you are completely ruining the sarcasm and nastinesss that are the mainstays of this blog.

As for the the idiotic real estate agents who read this blog, take note. The stories that NOP are telling are the way to sell a house for top dollar. If you could tell stories like NOP - true stories! - you could sell ice to an eskimo (inuit, ok!).

And no more stupid suggestions about condo conversions, Brownstoner.

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 8:48 PM

Thanks for the posting, 8:48. I think one of the reasons people buy in Brownstone Brooklyn is out of a sense of the people who once lived there. Merchants in Brooklyn Heights. Industrialists in Clinton Hill and Park Slope. The old Italian-American families in Cobble Hill.

Well, Crown Heights had (and still has) many people with stories. By putting them out in a place like Brownstoner, the neighborhood is given a little bit of context, both for folks living there today and for others who may be thinking of moving in.

I haven't lived in Crown Heights for almost half a century. That is literally. Emotionally, I'm still back in the old neighborhood. And probably will be forever. That's something for people looking at Crown Heights to consider. There's the immediate value of living in a rich and complex part of Brooklyn. There's the long-term value of coming from such a place.

NOP/(BCHM)


Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 10:36 PM

NOP, your post is worth a thousand credits' worth of courses in "urban affairs." Thanks for that wonderful trip in the Tardis.*
*Geeks will get it.

Posted by: Brenda from Flatbush at January 10, 2008 10:48 PM

Brenda from Flatbush:

I guess I'm too old to be a geek. What does "Tardis" mean?

NOP/BCHM

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 10:53 PM

BFM:

And too old to at first think of Googling "Tardis."

Thanks for the reference!

NOP/BCHM

Posted by: guest at January 10, 2008 11:08 PM

NOP, I have a photograph from the NY Public Library archives, of St. Mark's Place between Nostrand and New York, when the block only had mansions. They were magnificent dinosaurs from the gilded age. The barn shaped carriage house originally behind the Strauss mansion is the only survivor of that group. A couple of years ago I met a lady who has lived in CHN since the 40's, and she also told me about the mansion where the library is now, as well as the 2 mansions that made up the Children's Museum.

Those apartment buildings are still here, of course, but some have fared better than others. Some are well kept co-ops, some very low income warehouses. The larger ones have amazing interior courtyards, lobbies with fireplaces, stained glass and marble. It's easy to imaging white gloved doormen and elevator operators. It's also easy to picture kids having a ball running around all of the places you mentioned.

You really need to come visit again. I think you would be pleasantly surprised at how much is still just as you remember.

Thanks again for opening that door of memory that leads to my neighborhood.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 11, 2008 1:05 AM

MM:

So some of the buildings on St. Marks have gone co-op? I wish Brownstoner would post their apartments for sale. It would be a kick to see photos and plans.

Is the "Betsy Ross" at corner of New York Avenue one of these? When I was a boy, it was considered the neighborhood's best address. I always enjoyed visiting friends there because it seemed so "modern" -- even though it was neo-Georgian in style. Wood paneled elevators. Step-down livingrooms. Turqoise tiles in the bathrooms. And at the rear, apartments with spectacular views of Manhattan's skyline. Real sophisticated living. Or so everyone thought at the time.

NOP

Posted by: guest at January 11, 2008 9:09 AM

NOP, I don't know if it's still called that, or its status. Let me do some research and I'll get back to you on that one.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at January 11, 2008 10:55 AM

NOP- I loved your post (gee- you and MM can really compete in the literary dept!) I even saved it to read again. I'm a friend of MM's so you know I mean that in a good way! Wish I had seen the Betsy Ross in its heyday. Sounds like a lot of the old, incredible apartment buildings the Bronx used to have. those are making a comeback now- especially on the Grand Concourse.

I love these old houses- I grew up in the projects- actually in a great one, Hillside Homes, which is listed as a success story in the architectural guides. It was a wonderful place to grow up- we did have stickball and stoop ball too but something has always drawn me to the old houses. They are very haunting and much more beautiful than a brick box.

I understand why the B'klyn Children's Museum had to rebuild, but somehow I think that the way museums display things now, the way they teach, the atmosphere takes away all the mystery and wonder that really engage a child and make them want more. I complain a lot about the disneyfication of the imagination- it's all put out there in a prepackaged form. It makes "imagination" so easy and preformed- but I guess at that point it's no longer imagination.

Still, every summer I love hearing the sounds of kids on the street running around and still playing kid's games. Last summer I came home in the late afternoon and the sun had lit up the street so it was very golden, and the kids were running around, throwing shadows a mile long and made the sidewalk look like it was moving. The elderly were sitting lined up in their chairs, both sides of the street and our very well fed colony of cats were crossing the street to eat at the next feast.I don't know- it just was such a beautful Crown Heights moment- Sad to think that future NYers living in big "luxury" condos won't know moments like that. the neighborhoods won't be the same, the light won't be the same, even our daily interactions won't be the same. But for now it endures.

Posted by: guest at January 11, 2008 11:27 AM

11:27:

Your description of kids playing on a summer's evening and "throwing shadows a mile long" is exactly what I remember from my Crown Heights' boyhood.

Are there many things more pleasureful than a good Brooklyn street?

NOP

Posted by: guest at January 11, 2008 1:57 PM

Does anyone outhere know if the house at 887 St. Mark's Avenue was destroyed by fire around 1959 or before or what happened to it? One of my relatives lived there way back. But the house is gone now. There is a church there now.

Posted by: guest at January 20, 2008 4:44 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions