« New Top Brass For Forest City is an Old Hand AY-Area Affordable Housing: Made in the Shade »

October 23, 2007

Grim Perspective on Mortgage Crisis in Poor Nabes

nedap_bk1.jpgFormer FT scribe and Bed Stuy resident James Doran has a powerful piece on WNYC this morning about how the combination of lending abuse and outright fraud are combining to hit the borough's poorer neighborhoods like Bed Stuy and East New York particularly hard. “I wish I could say that the worst is over but the projections for NYC are not good,"says Sarah Ludwig, director of Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project (NEDAP). "What you see is that the foreclosure actions filed are overwhelmingly concentrated in New York’s neighborhoods of color." Doran reports that the number of mortgage fraud cases on the FBI's plate quadrupled over the past year. One victim is James LeSure, who's on the verge of losing the building he's owned on Bushwich Avenue since 1969. After paying off his mortgage completely, LeSure refinanced a few years ago when, with medical bills starting to pile up, he received a cold-call from a mortgage broker promising to solve all his problems with an expensive ARM that would, the broker said, be refinanced into a fixed-rate loan within a few months. That never happened, and now LeSure is in the process of having his one asset taken away from him. New York Neighborhood Housing Services (NHS) did one study of Bed Stuy that "almost every other house on the block had risky loans that were likely to default." Update: The transcript and audio are now available on the link.
Housing Crisis Hits City Hard [WNYC]
NEDAP: Foreclosure Map [WNYC]




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/2667

Comments

Allow prices to adjust to market conditions and it will create more affordable housing than any government program ever will. Homes owned by poor people should not be worth 800K, is this really so complicated?

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 10:28 AM

I said it before and I'll say it again:

I just don't understand all this foreclosure nonsense. The 10-year Treasury (upon which most mortgage spreads are based) hasn't been this low, even with the recent increase, since the mid-1960's. (http://www.briefing.com/morningstar/mtgdata/t10.htm)

If a 2% increase on your mortgage/HELOC is going to cause you to go into foreclosure, you had no business:

1) buying the house in the first place, or

2) taking out some crazy HELOC/2nd Mortgage, etc.

I want a story that asks a few hundred people in foreclosure as a result of refinancing what they did with the PROCEEDS from their refi's. And asks how many were laid off or had medical emergencies, etc. versus how many were irresponsible with their finances, took some "easy" money, spent it on stuff and wound up in trouble.

This "crisis" is not at all different from the credit card "crisis" where fools take easy & expensive credit and blow themselves up into bankruptcy.

Were there predatory lending practices? Sure, but where’s that good 'ol American self-reliance, responsibility and self-sufficiency (not to mention basic home economics) when you need it?

I feel badly for those that lost their homes due to job loss or unforeseen medical bills BUT we’re not in a recession (yet) so I think the major reason for the foreclosures so far is financial irresponsibility.

Again, what did all these long-time owners who took out refi's or HELOC's SPEND the proceeds on?

While I'm at it, why are we one of the only developed nations with a NEGATIVE savings rate?

And re: James LeSure (above) ... "the broker said it would be refinanced into a fixed-rate loan within a few months" ... the broker "SAID" ... come on! It's either in the loan docs or it's not true. The City offers FREE courses on this stuff.

Ok, ranting over … I'm ready for the inevitable flaming.

Posted by: Mr Joist at October 23, 2007 10:43 AM

Wow- "homes owned by poor people should not be worth 800K.."
Why not? Many of those "poor" people have lived in, cared for and worked hard to pay off their mortgage for those homes and if the market and their value is fairly appraised at such then so be it..regardless of how "poor" we may see them to be.

Anyway- my heart does go out to Bedsty- I have lived and loved this community all of my life (even upon my relocation to Atlanta in search of a neighborhood with a "Brooklyn" feel but more affordable housing)..
While I agree that the prices should return back to being a bit more realistic I do hope neighborhoods of color rebound and finally received the recognition and value appreciation they deserve.

Posted by: NiaKnowles at October 23, 2007 10:46 AM

i'm getting antsy with all the innuendo surrounding the mortgage crisis, in which people keep juxtaposing race and mortgage woes. it's like that other article that even admitted it didn't track usable data. now nedap has this map (which by the way, does NOT show foreclosures, it shows mortgages in 'default' which is not the same thing) with hash marks showing 'neighborhoods of color' and while not making any conclusions is like having some guy nudge you with raised eyebrows and go "Hmmmm..."

i'm not saying it's not true but please, you gotta get the hard data before you start protesting conspiracy theories, it just weakens the argument.

Posted by: Jimmy Legs at October 23, 2007 10:51 AM

Compassion would allow you to see that not all of us have a level of sophistication to understand when a scam is being pulled on us. can you not see that a former "dirt farmer" is out of his depth dealing with a slick talking shit merchant of a mortgage broker? Who is protecting the little guys from slime like them? That poor man was ripped off by scumbags after working his entire life to have a home. Medical bills (which we should be ashamed of in the country) forced him to look for money in the only asset he had. Also, why assume that everyone squandered their money, when here we have a story without even a hint of that. In addition, how would that make these loans any better? The money and how it is spent is not the problem.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 10:52 AM

Well I don't believe it. Mr B talking about the root causes of this Mutant Real Estate Bubble. Good for you!

"I want a story that asks a few hundred people in foreclosure as a result of refinancing what they did with the PROCEEDS from their refi's. And asks how many were laid off or had medical emergencies, etc. versus how many were irresponsible with their finances, took some "easy" money, spent it on stuff and wound up in trouble."

This has kept the American economy propped up. The consumer is running on fumes now. The banks are trying to cover this mess up.
There is NO good news on Real Estate in Main Stream Media. This winds up as a depression.

Here read this story about dumped Mortgage files.

Dumped Mortgage Files Invite Identity Theft
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119309606825767724.html?mod=PageOne_1

The What

Someday this war is gonna end.......

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 10:56 AM

This is wildly deceptive.
Each dot on this map is almost the size of a city block. Each block of brownstones is roughly 100+ different properties. Assuming a benign rate of 1-2% defaults, the map should be red.

The reason that manhattan and bklyn heights are not red is that most of those properties are commercial properties which don't have mortgages in the same system -- there are very few owner occupied 1-4 family homes in midtown.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 10:58 AM

ooohhh, heeelp! Somebody protect me from myself!

I just took out a $300,000 ARM Refi and spent it all on a new car and a flat screen TV.

Now they want me to pay it back! Heeelp, it's just not fair.

I need Big Brother Big Government to protect me from myself and tell me how to be responsible.

I need race-baiting NEDAP maps to show how I was exploited. It's not my fault … I'm the VICTIM!

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 11:02 AM

11:02:

No. You're a complete idiot.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 11:11 AM

While I feel for a lot of these people and many were led down the path by predatory scumbags, they did sign a legal document acknowledging the terms of the agreement. Can't understand how ignorance became a valid defense.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 11:14 AM

I think the situation has to be divided up into more than just a lump sum of foreclosures.

On the one hand, you have people who recently bought over their means, some of whom were fine until disaster struck, in the form of medical emergency, layoff, etc while others foolishly bought into slick scams promising low monthly payments without reading the fine print.

The case of Mr. LaSure above represents the other kind of foreclosure - involving elderly people who paid off their homes, only to refi, and get screwed.

Mr.Joist, you, and probably most of the posters here, just do not understand something that unscrupulous criminals do - the lack of financial education, especially among the senior citizens, in black and Latino neighborhoods. It is very hard to be educated in something you never had.

Mr. LaSure's life story is repeated over and over again in our communities - he came up from the South during a well documented migration pattern dating from the Depression to the 1960's. If he got any education at all in the segregated South, it was just enough to get by. He came to New York, worked like a dog in menial jobs that didn't require any education, and saved and bought a building. More than likely, Bushwick was redlined, so he didn't have Citibank and Chase offering him favorable terms, he probably had a private mortgage with higher interest rates than his white counterpart in Bay Ridge. Yet he paid it all off, by working hard his entire life, and now his building is really worth something. When did he have time to go to Wharton?

We younger and better educated folk, of all backgrounds, cannot imagine what it is like for someone in his shoes. Reading refi agreements is tough enough with a college education. Calling up a lawyer is not something he would necessarily be familiar with, especially since these mortgage people assure you that you don't need one. You read about wealthy senior citizens with plenty of education getting fleeced by grifters everyday, so why should we blame many undereducated senior citizens for falling for these refi schemes?

We need an all out assault by city law enforcement, housing and senior citizen advocates, and non-profits to educate as many as possible, especially in minority neighborhoods, to educate, educate, and educate.

These people are not stupid. To have survived and thrived all these years without the benefits many take for granted means they are deserving of our respect and help. Prosecution of mortgage crooks, and education are the only things that will bring these numbers down.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 23, 2007 11:18 AM

So why do we accept so phlegmatically financial markets (commercial paper, leveraged buyouts) riddled with refinancing risk and then hurl abuse at home-buyers caught up in the same problem?

Posted by: Gringcorp at October 23, 2007 11:28 AM

the stats show clearly that immigrants were charged higher rates, sold more risky loans, and screwed over with higher rate increases. We're not talking 2% over the 30 year here, people who can least afford a rate increase are being show rates of 10% or 12% or more!

The reasons are really simple. Mortgages were arranged by people with a financial interest in seeing them signed, but no financial interest in seeing them last. Most of the mortgage brokers just wanted to close the deal at all costs. They therefore preyed on whomever showed the least understanding of the complex products that were available. No surprise the poor and those with poorer language skills get shafted.

Wall street didn't care because they were packaging up these piles of sh*t in gold foil, the rating agencies were compromised and putting AA ratings on them, and they were selling them to funds to foreigners to anyone.

The boom has now turned to bust and the overhang will depress prices for years, and hit consumer spending hard. Unless the foreclose properties are handled with care entire blocks could suffer from empty and run-down properties which will place additional pressure on neighbors with mortgages who discover their loan is now worth more than their property.

If you discovered your mortgage is now larger than your property value, say by 20%, would you keep struggling to pay it, and pay rises in the rates, or would you seriously just consider walking off? I'd just walk off. Yeah my credit is burned but who can stand renting your house from a bank at higher than market rates?

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 11:34 AM

Hey Montrose Morris -- Thanks for totally taking the wind out of my sails. I was about to post a dumb-ass rant about how I didn't buy because I couldn't afford it (and still can't) and aren't I responsible and smart for not getting into some cockamamie mortgage and neener neener neener, but you saved me from myself with your compassion and intelligence. I'm a renter, but I refuse to be bitter, because I never had to work a menial job (yeah, my parents paid for me to go to college and study THEATRE of all things) or face racism (white girl from Westchester in the house). Pretty much I've had the luxury of doing whatever I damned well pleased my whole life, and I have enough formal education and resources to keep myself out of trouble with predators. All I don't have is a down payment. There's worse things. So for real, thanks. I was almost an asshole here, but you brought me up short.

copy_gal

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 11:35 AM

bravo NiaKnowles..I agree with you...The homes in Bed Stuy are BEAUTIFUL...if they were owned by rich non colored folk then I am sure the first poster would think the would be worth more than 800k...

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 11:49 AM

Montrose:

A well-reason and articulate argument and an admirable position. You make many good points and I agree with much of what you wrote about Mr. LeSure but my original question remains unanswered.

Most articles covering this topic focus on the fraudulent or high-pressure tactics of the sleazy mortgage brokers or profile a "tough-luck" story like Mr. LeSure's that pulls at your heart strings. Mr. LeSure's story is indeed a tragedy and the answer, as you mention, is better education and enforcement. I'm all for NEDAP promoting financial education and letting homeowner's know about HPD's free Housing Education Services. http://home2.nyc.gov/html/hpd/html/homeowners/courses.shtml

What I asked for (and which I have yet to see) is a scientific sample of homeowner's in default or foreclosure that tracks where the PROCEEDS of these loans, deceptively made or not, went. If the data shows that the majority of the borrower's used the PROCEEDS of these loans for medical emergencies, support of a family after a layoff, etc. … then I'm with you. (No one should have to lose their hard-earned home equity because we can't seem to pass a national health insurance law.)

My hypothesis is that for every Mr. LeSure there are 10 borrower's that used the PROCEEDS of these loans, whether they understood the terms or not, to live beyond their means.

You don’t need a Wharton MBA to understand that if you spend more than you make, you're going to wind-up broke. That's been true for all races, creeds and colors since the beginning of time.

Posted by: Mr Joist at October 23, 2007 11:50 AM

HI Everyone
I wrote the peice on WNYC this morning and I appreciate all your comments.
I can assure those of you with doubts about he veracity of the data I used, that the numbers of defaults and foreclures have been verified by several independent organisations and are recognised both by national, local and government bodies.
I am especially grateful to Montrose Moris, not just because he/she agrees with me, but because his/her comment elaborates upon and gives great perspective to this widespread and terrible problem that the media simply does not have the time or space to go into in the depth it deserves.
That said, I applaud WNYC for allowing me, a freelance journalist, the time and space to bring this problem to the fore.
Thanks for taking the time to listen
James Doran

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 11:55 AM

Why does Staten Island have such a high concentration of defaults in areas that are not majority black/hispanic?

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 12:05 PM

Mr. Joist, you might find it reasonable to extrapolate from the United State's huge current account deficit and extremely low savings rate that borrowers have been splurging their proceeds on useless crap, but as you suggest, the anecdotal evidence isn't up to snuff. You might find that the ultra-low income borrowers, the ones profiled here, haven't been splurgers, but the flippers of the Inland Empire, Vegas and Miami have. To suggest though, that the poor have been frittering away their inheritance on baubles strikes me as rather Dickensian. It can only be a short while before someone mentions debtor's prison or the work-house.

Posted by: Gringcorp at October 23, 2007 12:08 PM

Mr. Joist, I don't understand your insistance on this data. First of all, I think you would be hard pressed to get accurate data, and frankly, is it any of your, or a statistician's business? Since when do we, as private citizens, require other private citizens to give an accounting of what they do with their money, unless we have IRS after our names? Why should the poor, and especially minority citizens, have to? Big Brother, or more accurately Big Bwana indeed.

You seem to be wanting numbers that categorically say that XX% of minority foreclosures are because they bought a new Lexus and a flat screen - how typical of them, no? Granted, I'm sure a few did, just like most Americans all over the country do, but I would bet, especially amongst seniors, that the vast majority refied to pay medical bills, fix a house with 50 years of deferred maintainance, bury a loved one, or help family.

Most Americans live above their means, including, and maybe especially, people making big bucks. That is not an excuse for people who knew better, gambled and are now losing, but I still say that financial ignorance and and believing financial snake oil salesmen are more to blame than living large.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 23, 2007 12:08 PM

to answer the Staten island Question:

The heavily red dotted area of Staten Island shown on the map is also at least 50% black or latino, you can see it better on the map posted at WNYC which is reprodced slightly larger with little black diagonal lines clearly visible.
I am told there has been a rapid influx of Latino families into the North Shore of Staten Island.

James D

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 12:15 PM

There is also an important point that many who object to the argument in this piece are glossing over.
This is a generational problem. The areas with large concentrations of foreclosures were also poorly served by big reliable banks. The history of mainstream banks avoiding minority neighborhoods is well documented. Without a reliable bank in your area to turn to for solid financial advice it is easier for the loan sharks and subprime brokers to ply their trade. It's a simple matter of marketing theory. If there is a gap in the market someone will fill it.
Not all of these brokers are fraudulent. Some are entirely straight and do a good business helping out their friends and neighbors through small informal client networks -- they are good local entrepreneurs. But the lack of oversight and regulation for lending businesses, coupled with the ease with which one can apply for and be granted a massive amount of money for property investment in the subprime market, has created a fertile hunting ground for criminals. It is too easy for a "broker" to use a client's name and address -- or prospective address -- to get a few hundred grand in proceeds without the need to prove income or employment. At the very best he will charge you an exorbitant fee, and at the very worst he will keep all of the money and skip town.
I have encountered dozens of examples of the same scam. One of the chief perpetrators of the scam is currently in Rikers, having been found guilty of ripping off more than 200 mortgage holders all over the city -- and that’s just one man.
So, yes, some people are irresponsible with money (a point I also make in the piece) but the MAJORITY of people in this predicament were taken advantage of to some degree. Most of them were equity rich and cash poor, most of them were black or Latino, and most of them were elderly. Those three criteria together make a pretty vulnerable group and an obvious mark for any knowing con-man.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 12:27 PM

I knew this was destined to devolve into a race argument.

Montrose: I never mentioned "minority foreclosures" in any of my posts, just defaults and foreclosures. Your "… they bought a new Lexus and a flat screen - how typical of them, no?" comment is race-baiting so I will ignore it. And regarding your "used the proceeds to bury a loved one" comment … you forgot '...and used the proceeds to buy Tiny Tim a new crutch' and '...used the proceeds to feed hungry puppies warm milk.' Also, to the extent taxpayers are being asked to fund assistance (to big banks or to individual homeowners in trouble) of course it’s our right and duty to understand the circumstances and context of the situation.

Gringcorp, Montrose and James Doran seem to think the majority of those in default and foreclosure were taken advantage of and conned into taking loans they didn’t understand and then used the proceeds for dire life emergencies. (Mr. Doran, how do you know, per your last post, that the "MAJORITY of people in this predicament were taken advantage of to some degree"? That's a lot of red-dots to interview.)

I think the majority of those in default and foreclosure (of all races, thank you very much Mr. Morris) took easy money, lived beyond their means and got into trouble. Some (in my view, well less than a majority) were victims of crimes and those responsible should be punished.

In the absence of additional data beyond the lis pendens dots, this argument is opinion-based and I've said my peace (although I must admit manically hitting refresh to re-post has been great fun).

Posted by: Mr Joist at October 23, 2007 12:41 PM

"Also, to the extent taxpayers are being asked to fund assistance (to big banks or to individual homeowners in trouble) of course it’s our right and duty to understand the circumstances and context of the situation."

You're joking, right? Not to go too far off topic, but please inform me of the last time taxpayers actually had an 'active' role in 'being allowed' to determine how tax dollars are spent?

You know as well as I do that your power in that department is limited to the point of being non-existent. They'll let you vote on it - - sure. But seriously...

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 1:09 PM

Every time an argument like this happens on Brownstoner (or Curbed), I am shocked by the callousness, ignorance, and not so subtle racism exhibited by many posters. I don't know why these comments and sentiments shock me anew each time (by now, I should be accustomed to it, right?), but it does.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 1:11 PM

Mr Joist, since the subject of the piece is minority foreclosures, race is a given. To think that race does not enter the question would be as unrealistic and unworthy as your warm milk and Tiny Tim remark. It just so happens that people do have to bury loved ones, especially when you are elderly, and those around you don't have life or burial insurance. Ever price a decent funeral in New York City? I'm not talking about top of the line casket and the works either. It's expensive. Period.

You are correct that it behooves us as taxpayers to find out what's going on. I think you will find that Mr. Doran, Gringcorp and others are correct, and that the majority of these people, most especially senior citizens, were exploited, and exploited by masters of the art. You may choose not to believe that, and think whatever you want, but your opinion that people just went for the bling doesn't make it so.

Most educated people don't read their entire refi agreements. Most people don't read the usage agreements on computer software either, nor do we read the small print on any number of everyday documents, including credit cards. Why should you expect more of the elderly and economically disadvantaged than anyone else?

Senior citizens bought homes in neighborhoods that the city forgot, and that banks and insurance companies and everyone else couldn't be bothered with. They made their monthly payments and paid their taxes. Now that their neighborhoods are on the radar, and their homes are worth astronomical amounts, they are targeted by the slick and the unscrupulous, who sneaked in while the rest of us weren't watching, and sold these people the moon. It will cost us far less in the long run to pass and enforce laws to put these criminals away, and for programs to rescue these homeowners to thrive, than to assume that the majority of them simply thought they had won Lotto and went hog wild, and let them fall by the wayside. It is the just and correct thing for a civilized society to do - protect the elderly from a mugger in a suit.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 23, 2007 1:17 PM

right, cuz no poor peoples needed funerals before the subprime mess.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 1:22 PM

I just moved to a Brooklyn neighborhood and paid a nice elderly black couple over $1 million dollars for their house they bought in 1973. Where's that story my bleadign heart friends?

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 1:25 PM

They weren't being foreclosed on. So what's your point?

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 23, 2007 1:29 PM

Besides which, 1:25, your post implies that ALL someone has to do, is sell. What if you don't want to sell? What if you have been paying for, and now live mortgage free in your house for the last 40 years, and you want to die in your house? But you need some of that equity that you are entitled to be able to draw on?

Higher income people draw on their equity everyday, and don't sell. It is possible for even someone on a limited and fixed income to borrow on their equity and be able to pay it back, provided they were sold an above board loan from an honest broker, with terms that they can afford. The problem is that too many of these loans are not honest and above board, hence foreclosure.

The couple you bought your house from are the recipients of well deserved profits from their investment. But they chose to sell, not everyone wants to.

As we speak, I am listening to a radio ad advertising loans to people with bad credit, through refinance. It's everywhere, including the NYT classical station WQXR. The entire mortgage business needs to be better regulated, and the scum scooped off and discarded. It's disgraceful.

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 23, 2007 1:41 PM

Thank you Montrose Morris for your well written posts. You saved me the time from writing it myself and I could not have said it better. My parents and grandparents who came up from the South and the West Indies made off good when they sold their homes in BedStuy and Park Slope and then moved back South and to Barbados. But many of their neoghbors who worked just as hard as they did and who they were no smarter than they were didn't. My grandparents were blessed to have children and grandchildren who were there to protect them from fraudulent schemes. Very important point that you made, held true in my family. My grandparents had to buy their house all cash in the 1950's as did most of their neighbors until the mid 1970's because Bed Stuy was redlined. On the other hand the family that my grnadmother worked for in Bay Ridge placed a small down payment on their home and secured a mortgage for the rest.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 2:05 PM

The real estate industry in New York is corrupt and unusually malevolent. If you can't stand the heat, don't get too close to the AGA.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 2:15 PM

I think people wont have to worry much longer. Our financial system is in big trouble. The Mutant Real Estate Bubble was set up to bring change.To put people in perpetual debt, which they cant repay. You will NEVER pay off you mortgages, I MEAN EVER! This is not a black or white thing, it's a dumbass thing. Chucky or Joe Six Pack or whatever you call him is FUCKED. You pension plans, 401k's, savings are in big trouble. 4 Trillion dollars of money wasted in Real Estate and when not if it blows up, you will be left penniless and homeless.

BTW Bring it on Grammar Nazis.

The What

Someday this war WILL end.......

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 2:28 PM

12:27 PM,1:09 PM,copy_gal, Mr. Doran and esp. Montrose Morris,
Finally, more than just your average discussion of “parlor floor kitchen vs. ground floor kitchen”, comments from RE brokers transparently trying to boost their listings or rather incoherent (though not always dismissible) rantings from Monsieur Le What.
THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU!

Most Sincerely,
FortGreener

PS And here’s something else to chew on:
Where’s mention that a LARGE portion of bankruptcies in the US in recent years have caused by medical bills? [And Congress made it even harder to file for bankruptcy, as you should all know, so let’s not call it “bankruptcy” any longer…maybe just “personal financial failure”.] The actual percentage caused by medical bills is debatable but it is NOT negligible. I lived in a country with national healthcare and never heard of anyone there going into poverty due to the cost (or cost-sharing, co-pays, deductibles or what-have-yous) for their medications, surgeries, or other debatably life-supporting therapies prescribed by docs. Back in the Land of Debt though, many who end up in financial failure or on the brink of it, have probably no other resource of real value to tap into except their home…this often occurring in a time of personal trauma/stress. It has been widely studied that people of color and lower income face major illnesses earlier and die younger than their white and relatively wealthier counterparts. In fact, it is said African American men pay into Social Security but collect very little per capita due to mortality as compared to others. People who may not have health insurance and who fall ill before age 65-Medicare eligibility and even people who do have health insurance but have many out-of-pocket costs (both well- and under-insured people) may very well not have enough savings or other cash-convertible resources at hand. Thus, they turn to mortgage brokers if they own a home in this time of real estate value run-ups. And yes, the ads have been everywhere: “Consolidate your debt…come to us for a new mortgage…pay $500/month for a 200K mortgage” and other such horrors. I speak in “inpersonals” but have first-hand experience.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 2:34 PM

I never thought i woudl see the day when "The What" makes more sense than Montrose "I have an agenda" Morris

Someday this war will probably end.......

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 2:36 PM

If you think the What makes more sense than MM, you could consider therapy.

And What, a decline in real estate values does not signal the APOCALYPSE. Get a grip.

Whenever What posts, I picture him writhing in some dark cave like Dostoevsky's underground man, except What is writhing over mortgages, rather than existential angst.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 3:12 PM

This is Dostoevsky's Underground Man.

3:12 is a fool.

Thank you.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 3:23 PM

"And What, a decline in real estate values does not signal the APOCALYPSE. Get a grip."

No you get one! I know it's hard to reach the brainwashed masses. Financial System is in TROUBLE! Stop watching CSI. Read the Wall Street Journal, they have some great stories on Real Estate.

BTW My cave is paid off, got real cheap. It's even has a built in strip club.

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...........

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 3:27 PM

Greenspan Says `State of Fear' in Credit Markets

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=aQshVLZRFeDw&refer=canada

OHHH Doggie!!!!!!
If you chuckle heads think everything is good. Please read this!
It come from you Homeboy Greensperm!

The What

***Laughing his ass off in his cave***

Someday this war is gonna end.......

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 3:36 PM

I have no agenda other than to work to help people to be able to keep what they have worked so hard to get. If I were in the DA's office, I would make it my mission to prosecute these three piece suited rip off artists to the full extent of the law. To me, they are more injurious to the senior homeowner than any back street mugger.

Fort Greener hits the nail squarely on the head - medical costs are a huge factor in senior refinancing. This aspect of the refi story needs to be further investigated. If people weren't desperate, they might not get scammed so easily, or jump at the first opportunity that comes along.

Younger people need to remember the generational differences involved here as well. We are used to shopping around, questioning everything, using the internet to investigate, getting second opinions, as well as being pushy jerks when we need to be, and cynical questioners of everything. That is not true for many seniors, especially minority and ESL seniors, who do not question authority with the same lack of deference that younger generations do. This does not make them stupid, just more ripe for the right kind of pitch.

This is a very complex issue, and needs to be approached on many levels of both understanding as well as education and help. We need to have seminars in our churches, senior citizen centers, and we as children and grandchildren need to step up to the plate and do our bit for educating anyone we can.

Reverse mortgages are an alternative to a standard refi, and may be a way for someone to get needed money, and not lose their home if they can't pay back. Maybe not so hot for their heirs, but why shouldn't a senior be able to take advantage of the fruits of their labors?

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 23, 2007 3:44 PM


"No you get one! I know it's hard to reach the brainwashed masses. Financial System is in TROUBLE! Stop watching CSI. Read the Wall Street Journal, they have some great stories on Real Estate."

NICE paragraph, What! You should have put a comma after "No," and a "The" before "financial system," but for you, this represents serious improvement! Give yourself another pat on the back! Finally there is real hope that you will actually learn to properly use the English language BEFORE the the real estate/credit/bank/climate change apocalypse hits!

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 3:48 PM

"Reverse mortgages are an alternative to a standard refi, and may be a way for someone to get needed money, and not lose their home if they can't pay back. Maybe not so hot for their heirs, but why shouldn't a senior be able to take advantage of the fruits of their labors?"

Did you know if the value of your house goes down, the "Reverse mortgage" RECAST ITSELF!. Then it turns into a full mortgage that has to be paid back. Reverse mortgages are crack for senior citizens! Do you think Mortgage Brokers and Banks have been honest with senior citizens!!!?? Guess what that is???!!!! More ways to fuck over people.

The What

Someday this war will end........

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 3:55 PM

dude, monty morris has written a fricken' novel on this thread. go get some fresh air and give the other socialist marxists a chance to comment and save the children.

yay Consequentialist Libertarianism!

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:00 PM

Hey What,

If you are soooo convinced of this real estate collapse, and you bought your place and paid it off as you claim, why not sell now and cash in before the coming crash?

If I were in your position, that is what I would do. Then you rent for a while and wait for prices to come down by 50-100% and buy something else....Based on your predictions, maybe the market will come down so much people will actually pay you to take their property!

Posted by: newsouthsloper at October 23, 2007 4:00 PM

"Hey What,

If you are soooo convinced of this real estate collapse, and you bought your place and paid it off as you claim, why not sell now and cash in before the coming crash?

If I were in your position, that is what I would do. Then you rent for a while and wait for prices to come down by 50-100% and buy something else....Based on your predictions, maybe the market will come down so much people will actually pay you to take their property!"

This statement shows how clueless people are. Why would i give up my asset for pieces of paper. Money has no intrinsic value! The same price it cost to print a 1 dollar bill is the same cost to print a 100 bill.

Maybe if money was backed by REAL ASSETS like Gold or Silver maybe. But not it's very cheap not and there is no other alternatives I would consider now.

Here read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsic_value

The What

Someday this war is gonna end..........

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:10 PM

The way I see it, it's not even a race issue. This is a national issue with great implications of America in a globalized world. This housing bubbles started with Greenspan & Co leveraged by easy Chinese credits. Unfortunately, as net result, we are now as much addicted to Asians & Mid-Eastern credits as we are to Saudi's oil. Of course, Greenspan & Co allowed this to happen and continue, to engender sense of wealth and personal/socioeconomic progress among middle-class Americans despite the fact that avg. American wage haven't kept up with inflation for the past 7 years. Also, as a *winking* gesture to retiring baby-boomers & greying politicians, Greenspan sought to BAILOUT the boomers of their bankrupted retirement funds and what's better vechicle than housing, when most of them are prob. homeowners. This is a race thing now, but in due time, it will be a generational thing and we will hate them for it. If WWII generation is the "greatest", then the baby-boomers will go down as greediest and most wasteful generation ever!!

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:10 PM

Amen Amen Amen !!!!!! 4:10 Preach on brother Amen!!!!!!!!

The What

Someday this war is gonna end...

BTW I thought I was alone is the world.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:15 PM


"The way I see it, it's not even a race issue. This is a national issue with great implications of America in a globalized world. This housing bubbles started with Greenspan & Co leveraged by easy Chinese credits."

You're not alone, What, and I'm taking back my earlier compliments. This guy is as semi-literate as you are! Not surprisingly, his message is similar. I find it hard to take you guys very seriously considering you don't have command of your own primary language.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:25 PM

Dr. Ron Paul for President!

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:28 PM

Good God, What. If it's all a huge scam, then just opt out, pitch a teepee in the woods of Manitoba, and live off the land. Fact is, the majority of us have to function in this society as best we can, and that involves playing the money game with the hands dealt us. Most people just want to be able to pay their bills, put something aside, and have a bit extra for some niceties in life. What's wrong with that? Not everyone can convert their assets into diamonds and gold, or figure out the convolutions of thought cooked up by the economic think tanks and Nobel Prize winners. How about some practical suggestions, instead of striding up and down Main Street with a sandwich board announcing the end is near?

Posted by: Montrose Morris at October 23, 2007 4:43 PM

4:00 PM (Consequentialist Libertarianism!):
Don't be so jerky and cockeyed...throwing around big words that don't mean anything in this discussion. Montrose Morris is not writing a novel but an essay.

4:10 PM Thanks for that addition.

Monsieur Le What...yes, please, you really need to write coherently. You don't do your argument(s) any service by writing the way you do. And, BTW, I don't disagree with most of what you write. You know the old addage: more flies with honey...? That might help too. Otherwise, your comments look like so much sputtering to many people (not me...I am just looking at it from the PR side of it) which shuts down their receptiveness...but you probably know this already. ;-)

FortGreener

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:45 PM

Has there been a study nationwide, not just citywide, on foreclosures and age of homeowners of all races? That study would be more revealing to me about who was targeted by these lenders, than just looking at NYC where there may be a concentration of elderly black homeowners. Could be something cultural, like they are more likely to stay in NYC after retirement instead of leave for Florida.

Companies who take advantage of seniors are disgusting. These companies knew full well what could occur.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:50 PM

Montrose Morris is right, if you REALLY care (like The What tries to claim) then you'd make suggestions and brainstorm to help people. Not just try as hard as you can to make people afraid and miserable. It's that very intent that undermines everything you say and do, The What. It shows us you are not a good person.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:52 PM

yah, you be right 4:25.

forget the message, it's all about diction!

thou arst a douchebaggery.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 4:53 PM

4:53's addition...
This is getting positively hysterically funny.
Laughing through the tears,
FortGreener

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 5:00 PM

I love how the same people that are espousing this "they were illiterate, uneducated poor people and we need to help them" are the SAME ones ripping on some posters' grammar. Oh the liberal hypocrisy!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 5:16 PM

Fuck The What.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 5:38 PM

Derrr 5:16,
"Liberal hypocrisy"? Please.
First of all, your quote of "they were illiterate, uneducated poor people and we need to help them" wasn't in this thread until YOU concocted it...And, frankly, those who are thoughtfully discussing the problems of seniors being preyed upon by mortgage reps, such as Montrose Morris, are not the grammar-whippers like me who find slogging through Monsieur Der Vas's posts like reading the hate notes from a psych patient. Monsieur Le What is hardly illiterate...but delivers some real drek...or should I write, some "okay" ideas couched in drek?

And furthermore, when did Monsieur WandenWas become simply "some poster"? I guess you're new to Brownstoner. Le marquis de Vas-am-What is famous here on the blog.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 5:38 PM

Openwide, eh Countrywide wants to help you. Now they want to give you a reach-around. LMMFAO

Countrywide Commits to $16 Billion Home Preservation Program
http://about.countrywide.com/PressRelease/PressRelease.aspx?rid=1065882

The What

Someday this syntax will end... Get it (syntax) Oh, I crack myself up!
You MoFo's have been great. Thank you. I will be in the Pocono Mountains on 29th.


Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 6:06 PM


"yah, you be right 4:25.

forget the message, it's all about diction!"

Actually, it's about spelling and grammar. "Diction" refers to the spoken voice.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 6:21 PM

Enjoy your trip (all of them) Count What!
BTW, if you get any of those billions, send some to Brownstoner Dude to help with the blog.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 6:22 PM

To quote 5:38pm, FortGreener:
"And, frankly, those who are thoughtfully discussing the problems of seniors being preyed upon by mortgage reps, such as Montrose Morris..."

Shut-up! Montrose Morris is a mortgage rep who preyed on seniors?!?!

Oh how the tables have turned. Clauses are a bitch, eh?

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 6:24 PM

um, not it doesn't 6:21pm, you buttplug.

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/diction

Main Entry: dic·tion
Function: noun
2: choice of words especially with regard to correctness, clearness, or effectiveness

Always remember to consult Merriam-Webster before flaming ... it makes you look stoopid.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 6:27 PM

sorry friends

not = no

buttplug = pejorative

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 6:35 PM

With this many people forcasting doom and gloom I have to be the contrarian. Sorry but everyone was saying the worst about the Bush tax cuts and five years later there is still no recession, in fact we've had 5 straight years of GDP growth. Too many people listening to Paul Krugman and the like at the NYTimes waiting for the economy to "finally" collapse so that they can be vindicated in their political views. Sorry but too many were wrong on the idea that we would all be wiped out by a super hurricane season sure to follow katrina. That was two years ago and this season has been quite calm and will be over in a month. Too many were wrong about our certain loss in Iraq when the news I'm hearing is that violence is now down 70% there and people are planning a parade in Ramadi. It seems too convenient that there are too many people in a groupthink mode here. This points not to a lack of earnest intent but to a lack of earnest perspective. The larger economy continues to hum along and if we have one more month of mild weather in the northeast, the oil price scare will drop off nicely into the new year allowing for a controlled deflation of the housing market which had to come down from it's dizzy heights at some point. People will refinance, banks will bend backwards to protect their investments and many will buy in at the right time. Remember the markets going crazy after 9/11? guess what, they went up again.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 6:44 PM

Yes, 6:24 PM,
I laughed at my clause-and-effect too when I reread my post...once it was already up on the blog...whoops! But thanks for noticing...thank goodness there are still some close readers out there.
FortGreener

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 6:51 PM

6:44...Simply put: Foreclosures are up. The thread is based on the reports that have recently come out and James Doran's article/transcript. Sure, some of us are still floating along, but for a lot of people, these are really hard times. Things may not be collapsing for you, but they have been for large segments of the population. In fact, an argument could be made that standards of living have been slipping since Reagan came in.

Some of us are aware that most of the US food banks recently celebrated their 25th anniversary...all at the same time. This is because they were all started at the same time thanks to wonderful Reagan social cuts. Now, worse than ever, the stress on these food banks' resources has flown off the charts. So, yes, 6:44, for the bourgeois among us (and I'm a bouge, too, grammar snobbery and all), it's hard to sense what is going on for "the other half".

Not knowing the average age of the readers of this blog, I have a feeling that many were not adults in the 80’s so they may not have been aware/noticed any difference or felt the impact from that huge numbers of residents and patients from long-term care facilities for the mentally and psychologically challenged who were dumped out on the streets as Federal funding was slashed and facilities were forced to close. Homelessness soared. There was a feeling of social tragedy: another run-up in the real estate and stock markets while the poor kept getting poorer and the middle class started on that long slide into night. Nothing much new twenty years later…

Ever wonder why commercial free PBS is chock full of commercials? Thank the beginning of cuts which started in the 80’s. That’s just a light example…worse hit are all the social programs and non-profits that have been hit with a double whammy of government cuts and then private monies trying to fill an ever expanding need. That’s why you can what SUV ads one after the other on PBS. In the 70’s there was NO commercial advertising. Heck, PBS is getting to be like AMC was before it started cutting into movies with commercials…just had them before and after.

Social programs have never made it back to where they were but have only been hacked away at more. Many vibrant aspects and the (apparent) stability of the US I grew up in have disappeared.

Then again, given all the cyclical layoffs, downsizing, etc. all lot of the post-boomer set of bouges like myself and the boomlets are experiencing a more unstable, less well-paid environment as that our parents may have enjoyed. It’s hard to realize that it wasn’t like this for the past generation. The studies are there. Today we can expect to be jostled between many jobs and even fields during our working careers. This does not help with “vesting” in pensions, etc. and when you look at poorer people, they are having even harder times in this current state of job insecurity.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 7:19 PM

6:44,

Fact:
Average American wage has been stagnant for the past 5-8 years, barely keeping up with inflation. Doesn't that count for something?

Fact:
Average Chinese income has doubled in the past 5-8 years, adjusted for inflation and expected to double again in the next 5 years.

Dollar has been plunging...meaning avg Americans can afford less and less at Walmart and Target with the same income that they had 5-6 years ago. The Chinese workers are demanding more and more pay each pasting day and, foods, commodities, oil, etc. are all UP like CRAZY! Inflation is coming BIG TIME!

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 7:27 PM

Posted by The What:
Did you know if the value of your house goes down, the "Reverse mortgage" RECAST ITSELF!. Then it turns into a full mortgage that has to be paid back. Reverse mortgages are crack for senior citizens! Do you think Mortgage Brokers and Banks have been honest with senior citizens!!!?? Guess what that is???!!!! More ways to fuck over people.

The What

Someday this war will end........

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 3:55 PM


Dear The What,
This claim of yours about reverse mortgages is absolute bullshit. You clearly know very little, if anything, about reverse mortgages or how they work...

The reality is that Reverse mortgages probably would have helped a huge majority of the people who we're talking about here - those that got fucked over with shitty adjustable refi mortgages sold by cretinous slimy ooze bags...

At this point, having read dozens of your posts, I have to say there is usually very little and often NO credibility in anything you claim. (Other than the government sucks and doesn't care about its citizens and is propping up the economy and wall street to keep the machine humming - I'll agree with your sentiments there. But really, come on now already. Please tell us something we don't know...)

Anyway, you are now officially hereby OUTED from me on your ignorance of reverse mortgages and how they work.

You don't know jack shit about them.

Sorry if that hurts - have a great night...

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 10:07 PM

Brownstoner is meaningless. You are all losers.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 10:25 PM

how can someone with "cash in hand" help some these poor victims? I talking buy out not charity.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 11:26 PM

"Anyway, you are now officially hereby OUTED from me on your ignorance of reverse mortgages and how they work.

You don't know jack shit about them.

Sorry if that hurts - have a great night..."

Go blow a baseball bat!

The What

Someday this baseball bat will end!!!!

Posted by: guest at October 24, 2007 2:09 AM

"Dear The What,
This claim of yours about reverse mortgages is absolute bullshit. You clearly know very little, if anything, about reverse mortgages or how they work...

The reality is that Reverse mortgages probably would have helped a huge majority of the people who we're talking about here - those that got fucked over with shitty adjustable refi mortgages sold by cretinous slimy ooze bags...

At this point, having read dozens of your posts, I have to say there is usually very little and often NO credibility in anything you claim. (Other than the government sucks and doesn't care about its citizens and is propping up the economy and wall street to keep the machine humming - I'll agree with your sentiments there. But really, come on now already. Please tell us something we don't know...)

Anyway, you are now officially hereby OUTED from me on your ignorance of reverse mortgages and how they work.

You don't know jack shit about them.

Sorry if that hurts - have a great night...

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 10:07 PM

Brownstoner is meaningless. You are all losers.

Posted by: guest at October 23, 2007 10:25 PM

how can someone with "cash in hand" help some these poor victims? I talking buy out not charity."

If the Reverse Mortgage is more than the value of the house, The loan will recast FUCKTARD!

I bet you done screwed plenty of seniors into this shit. Now go away, never write the words 'The What'. Do some cold blowing er, cold calling.

The What

Someday this war will end...

Posted by: guest at October 24, 2007 2:13 AM

Dear The What,

Please read this info on reverse mortgages, ignoramus. (There are 9 or 10 separate "Chapters" to go through.) FYI, The loan WON'T recast, at least it won't if its a legitimate reverse mortgage.

And stop calling people "fucktards." It's unbecoming of you.

http://www.aarp.org/learntech/personal_finance/Articles/a2003-05-12-homemademoney.html

Posted by: guest at October 24, 2007 8:58 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions