« ESDC Continues To Fumble the Atlantic Yards Ball Green Roof For a Park Slope Brownstone »
July 20, 2007
Broken Angel: DOB Overzealous or Just Doing Its Job?

We haven't heard much on the Broken Angel front since late May when the DOB was trying to force the demolition of the masonry walls constructed by Arthur Wood, despite having signed off on earlier plans that showed them being left in place. Since then, the only major development has been the Stop Work Order placed on the building for "additional work outside the scope of the permits." In a recent email, Arthur's son Chris writes that the SWO came suspiciously on the heels of his father's refusal to drop his lawsuit against the city for abusing his civil rights. This part of his email hints at what Arthur comes right out and says in a recent video: That the city is carrying out a "sick vendetta" against him. Recent examples he points to are the revocation of his Veteran's Tax Exempt Status by the Department of Buildings and its failure to lift the stop work order after more than five weeks. It's impossible to know how much of Arthur's position is conspiracy theory and how much is fact, but it's certainly worth the time to listen to him make his case. While we can't begrudge DOB doing its job to make sure this is a safe and by-the-book project (especially since we spend so much time urging it to be more vigilant), it's impossible not to sympathize with Arthur and Shahn Andersen, the developer working with him, over the intense level of scrutiny and apparent lack of straight dealing they've received from both DOB and the courts, especially in light of how many real dirtbags are out there evading enforcement every day. It seems unfortunate that DOB and the city in general aren't working more in partnership, rather than in opposition, with Arthur and Shahn's efforts to do this project responsibly while trying to salvage as much of the neighborhood landmark's design and spirit as possible. We'll be interested to see what readers think when they've watched Arthur's video and read Chris' email which is pasted on the jump. You can also check out Chris' collection of Broken Angel photos and archives here.
Broken Angel Video July 2007 [Rumur.tv] GMAP
The Lowest Point [Broken Angel Reno]
It has been a while since I have posted any information about Broken Angel. I wanted to put out a public statement about the removal of the top of the building.
Prior to any court orders we removed all burnt and dangerous structures from Broken Angel. However this was not enough for the Department of Buildings, we were brought back to court repeatedly so that they could attempt to get us to remove as much of the building as possible. Initially we were hesitant to remove the entire top of the structure because we were afraid that they would not allow us to re-build up to the height in the Brooklyn skyline that Broken Angel has occupied for the last 20 years. Our fears have been realized and the DOB has so far successfully blocked any plans to rebuild the structure to its original height. What follows is a description of the events leading up to the demolition of the top structure of Broken Angel.
On May 2, 2007 Judge Sylvia Hinds-Radix ordered the removal of the fire damaged portion of Broken Angel. The order was loosely termed and left it up to the city to determine the extent of the demolition. Prior to this order the Department of buildings had signed a court agreement to require demolition of the wooden structure down to the fifth floor. We felt it was in the best interest of Broken Angel to comply with the new order thus keeping the city from demolishing at their whim the irreplaceable artistic structures which give the building its unique character. We were only given 10 days to finish all demolition and comply with the order. Thanks to Action Construction we were able to meet this deadline on such short notice. We were then brought back to court by the DOB because they accused us of not complying as they wanted all masonry created by my father removed and the building returned to its original plain box like structure. The Judge ruled against them because the original plans on which they had signed off included preserving all additional masonry incorporated into the building during the past 27 years. Now the DOB has blocked additional work on the building because again they are accusing us of not complying with the original plans. In this particular case the “dangerous” offense was that we filled in an arch with concrete and replaced part of an existing fire escape. Suspiciously, this recent stop work order was placed on the building shortly after my father refused to drop a pending law suit that he has against the city of NY for abusing his civil rights. Through out this entire process we have attempted to comply with the DOBs demands. Originally the DOB spokesperson Jennifer Givner made statements to Brooklyn Review on BCAT and the Daily News that my parents would be allowed to occupy the building once the structural dangers were dealt with. Now the very look of the building is being dictated by the DOB and no willingness has been shown to lift the vacate order even though the building has been deemed structurally sound.
With the help of a growing community of architects, activists, politicians and engineers we have worked hard to meet the demands of the Department of Buildings. These people have generously donated their time and energy to this cause because they were all in some way touched by the creativity and beauty of this unusual Brooklyn landmark. The department of Buildings and the City of New York should drop their campaign of harassment and recognize that Brooklyn wants the building that Arthur Wood envisioned, not another boring box of bricks. Why is our building under such scrutiny while other buildings in NY have actually collapsed? To this day people from all over the world still come to view the shell that was once Broken Angel. We are returning to court with a new Judge. Broken Angel needs public support more than ever. Hopefully in court we can get the Department of Buildings to allow us to rebuild our home, if so someday there will really be something there for people to see.
- Chris Wood, 7/18/07
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/1649
Comments
Brownstoner, why are you so sympathetic to these scofflaws? They own a building that had 27 years of illegal additions. After 27 years these illegal additions go up in flames(thankfully no one was hurt).
Even if his civil lawsuit has merit, it still shouldn't permit them to sidestep the law.
Posted by: Anonymous at July 20, 2007 10:14 AM
We didn't say they should sidestep the law, did we? Just that we wish that the city would try to work constructively with them to create a safe end-product that comes as close as possible to recreating what for many, many people is a special landmark and symbol of creativity. While no one should get a free pass on safety and obeying the law, the intentions of this artist and long-time resident of the community are very different than a penny-pinching developer performing an unsafe hit-and-run development on a neighborhood.
Posted by: Brownstoner at July 20, 2007 10:35 AM
The DOB is in the pocket of developers all over this city. they are all friends and accomodate each other. this is fact, not speculation. it is only through press and public pressure that they will ever make trouble for a problem developer. even worse than this is the fact that they talk out of both sides of their mouth. and why should the DOB like a free spirit like Arthur, someone who actually has the capability to add some creativity into the bland design mix that is dictated by profit first in this city? DOB does not care about enforcing regulation and promoting responsible construction, they care about money and favors.
Posted by: Anonymous at July 20, 2007 11:28 AM
What's the stop work order for exactly?
I don't think the DOB should treat these guys any differently than it does anybody else either.
Brownstoner, you ask that the DOB "work constructively" with them, but the DOB doesn't "work constructively" with anybody. They have strict rules that must be followed and that's it.
Sure, lots of slick developers seem to find ways to game the system, but what do you expect? The DOB by nature must treat everybody equally.
Posted by: Anonymous at July 20, 2007 11:32 AM
The sympathy confuses me too... the structure was a disaster in the making.
Charming and creative folks I'm sure, but please, some action had to be taken by DOB before people got hurt or killed.
Could it be that this "long time resident/artist" has been less than co-operative himself with the agencies in question, and has brought alot of grief upon himself by non-compliance.
I love edgy, non-boxy architecture too,
but if everyone started taking it upon themselves to start building on top
of their homes helter-skelter we would be living in dog-patch.
Posted by: bren at July 20, 2007 11:35 AM
yes in a perfect world they do, but give me a break, the DOB does not treat everybody equally.
Posted by: Anonymous at July 20, 2007 11:35 AM
I gutt renovated a townhouse and changed the C of O. Aside from numerous inspections, my experience with the DOB is that if you follow their rules, you can get things approved.
A stop work order that's been in effect for five weeks signifies a serious breach of the those rules, whether you're a "creative type" or a "business type."
Posted by: Anonymous at July 20, 2007 11:51 AM
ok, why doesn't the DOB enforce issues with larger jobs then? why does it take people getting killed for them to take action? how about some real enforcement, the consistent kind?? GIVE ME A BREAK, Arthur Wood is a target for them, no one said to give him special treatment. the only way for someone like Wood to get any leverage with the DOB is to make his issues as public as possible, it would be VERY different if he had the money and power of large development groups. tell me, i know he's not a developer, but how at this point does Scarano keep his license? and how do the developers he has made these violation buildings for get by scott free, not one ounce of focus or pressure?
Posted by: Anonymous at July 20, 2007 12:12 PM
we have been working with Arthur and Shahn on a documentary about the process of turning the building into condos- we have also posted a short traller at rumur.tv/brokenganel
Michael
Posted by: michael galinsky at July 20, 2007 1:45 PM
we have been working with Arthur and Shahn on a documentary about the process of turning the building into condos- we have also posted a short traller at rumur.tv/brokenganel
Michael
Posted by: michael galinsky at July 20, 2007 1:46 PM
typo in the above comment
we have been working with Arthur and Shahn on a documentary about the process of turning the building into condos- we have also posted a short traller at rumur.tv/brokenangnel
Michael
Posted by: michael galinsky at July 20, 2007 1:48 PM
can't wait...should be absolutely fascinating viewing...I will watch it eagerly after I see 'Sicko'...god I hope it's a satire...
Is it brokenangnel or brokenangel?
Posted by: Anonymous at July 20, 2007 2:01 PM
let's get real. the DOB allows developers free reign; as such they make it evident that they are patently aiding and abetting said developers.
sure, let blatant violations that lead to injury and death of workers, just let 'em slide. but some crazy old gray haired main (read, outside the main structure) gets taken down for his attempt to OWN his little bit of dirt.
somebody wants to make himself look good (i'm DOB, see what i do?) while, i suppose, aiding a developer in grabbing arthur's piece of dirt.
ya'll suck. i am a restaurant owner, stock daytrader, photographer.
my friends, artists all, started bailing on this town 5 years ago.
i'm on the way out, as well.
what happened to NYC? i'll tell you what happened. it was, and it is no more.
goodbye.
Posted by: suzy at July 20, 2007 5:12 PM
this blog is sooooo biased.... what is this.... protecting your buddies over here? comply like everyone else and move on.... the developer ( this is what these guys are now ) / victim role is DATED.
Posted by: yeah right! at July 20, 2007 8:56 PM
follow the money
Posted by: Anonymous at July 22, 2007 1:38 AM
Shahn?
Where are you and whats really going on?
What's the inside scoop, dude?
Posted by: Anonymous at July 22, 2007 10:52 AM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.