« Tuesday Events Meter Maids Sticking It to Residential Nabes »
June 19, 2007
ARM or Fixed-Rate? Tougher Call Now
For most of this year, nine out of ten homeowners with Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs) facing their first adjustment opted to swap into a fixed rate loan. This was a reflection of the wide spread between what the post-adjustment rate would have been (most likely more than 7.5 percent) and the rate on a 30-year fixed loan (around 6.25 percent). As the bond market has backed up in recent weeks, however, the fixed rate mortgage isn't looking quite as appetizing to some at 6.75 percent. “If we sit down rationally, we’ll see the rates are historically very, very low still,” said Melissa Cohn, Manhattan Mortgage CEO. “But we’re a greedy crowd.” In general, according to Cohn, those buying and refinancing in the hottest markets more likely to roll the dice with an ARM than their counterparts in more lethargic markets. Have any readers had to struggle with the ARM vs. fixed decision in the last couple of weeks?
Tough Choice: ARM or Fixed-Rate? [NY Times]
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/1400
Comments
The problem is that many of those who got ARM or back-loaded or introductory rate mortgages did so because they were the only ones they could qualify for.
When it comes time to swap to fixed, they don't get offered 6.75. Hell, *I* don't get offered 6.75, I get offered 7.1 currently even though with more than 50% down, I'm zero risk.
Most of those on ARMs get offered 8% or more on the fixed side, and probably almost as high on a new ARM!
Posted by: Anonymous at June 19, 2007 9:18 AM
Yep - I'm in the "jumbo" bracket; and closing won't occur for 2-3 months, so as rates climb, I went for a lock. The "price" of the lock was built into the interest rate (rather than a fee) and the difference in rates between a 30-year fixed and a 5/1 ARM was about .7%, which amounted to several hundred dollars per month. So though I was originally approved (and received a commitment) for a 30-year fixed, the rates are now such that I opted to roll the dice on the ARM.
The good news is that if rates retreat, I can toss the lock out the window and get the lower rate, whether via fixed-rate or ARM.
Posted by: Anon at June 19, 2007 9:23 AM
I just refied and went from a rather subprime 8.25% adjustable down to a comfortable 6.75 fixed rate. My previous mortgage holder had promised I could switch from adjustable to fixed with no closing costs, but lied, lied, lied. I went with another lender, which turned out to be a bank I've actually heard of, and has branches all over the country, and although had to pay closing costs, I'm so much better off.
I'm not wealthy, so I took what I knew was a subprime adjustable rate mortgage, ran with it for a year, got equity on my house, improved my credit rating and am all around better off, which I knew would enable me to get a better rate on a fixed rate mortgage. It is possible to play the system to one's advantage, but you need to be very careful, go with some experts to guide you, and shop around until you find a mortgage that works best for you.
I'm not going to name any of these institutions, only because that's too much information on the net. Call me paranoid.
Posted by: Anonymous at June 19, 2007 10:57 AM
the 30 yr fixed is based on the ten year treasury, and while rates might be headed up longer term, and no matter what anyone says, no one really knows. a look at this chart implies the rate on the tnx could easily pull back to 5.00 on this move:
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$tnx&p=D&yr=1&mn=0&dy=0&id=p13771107604
Posted by: raphael at June 19, 2007 11:36 AM
Raphael 11:36, can you please explain your logic behind this statement?
"a look at this chart implies the rate on the tnx could easily pull back to 5.00 on this move"
Posted by: Anonymous at June 19, 2007 11:51 AM
I'm in the fourth year of an ARM fixed for five years at 4.875%, then it will increase (I think) another two points. When I took it, I thought I would sell before it started going adjustable, but now I'm staying put. Due to income irregularity, I'm going to have trouble qualifying for the best fixed rate. Any suggestions?
Posted by: Carol at June 19, 2007 11:59 AM
9:23 -- Even with widening spreads between 30yr FRM and 5/1 ARM, 70 bps seems very large. At that gap, seems like a no brainer to go Floating
Posted by: Anony at June 19, 2007 12:02 PM
I'm 2.5 yrs into my 5 yr ARM. I am relating to 1159 and 1057 (except I'm not paranoid). I wasn't sure if I was going to sell in that timeframe but now I will try and hold on to this house when I move.
Its probably naive of me to assume this, but wouldn't my current lender want to restructure this rather than lose the loan to someone else when i refi?
(1057, how did they lie?)
As long as we're talking about it, should I do it now?
Posted by: greenwood slope at June 19, 2007 12:22 PM
the chart shows a powerful move breaking out of a base with resistance at around 5 or so. it doesn't matter what caused the move - whether it's cpi #s, last month's strong housing #s, maybe china rotating into other issues than the 10 yr treasury, hedge funds unwinding positions, a chain reaction in subprime loan pools raising cash....
the chart shows a series of gaps in a somewhat parabolic move - any good action often begets some sort of reaction, maybe 35%, maybe 50%, maybe a move to test one or more of those gaps. prices move as a result of supply and demand, and sooner or later the last buyer (or seller in this case, of bonds) is in (or out) for the time being.
there are no rules here, but most things that can be charted tend to follow patterns, and the best thing is to try to look at the chart and see what they are doing now, now that the media is saying about what already happened.
so, my reading of this is that the rate shown on the chart, that of the ten yr treasury, has temporarily peaked. I would make no prediction whatsoever as to what happens next, but from watching it trade it would appear that the bond is getting bought over the past few days, and not sold.
that said, the banks may be slow to react. most of them lowered by 1/8 of a point today, but the buy down schedules are not particularly borrower friendly. this is what people mean by tighter lending.
it isn't going to make it cheaper to buy, at any rate.
Posted by: raphael at June 19, 2007 12:29 PM
here's the chart marked up a bit:
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$TNX&p=D&yr=1&mn=0&dy=0&id=p13771107604&a=109721760
Posted by: raphael at June 19, 2007 12:40 PM
Raphael,
You sound like you know what you are talking about.
But please explain in English for those of us who are not bond experts.
What does this imply for those on this thread choosing between, say, a 30-year fixed vs. 5/1 ARM in the next year or so?
And why?
Posted by: tripster at June 19, 2007 12:47 PM
technical analysis for equities => guesswork
technical analysis for interest rates => guesswork squared
Posted by: Anonymous at June 19, 2007 12:50 PM
as I posted that $tnx is testing 50.98, the low of the day. meanwhile, gold is is up. homebuilding stocks are mostly up. I wouldn't be surprised to see the 30 yr fixed pull back another point here to 6.375 or maybe even 6.25 before another attempt to move up. keep in mind that the fed meets next week, and traders will try to run stops on those who are short the long bond to get them to cover.
Posted by: raphael at June 19, 2007 12:51 PM
Raphael, resistance is now support. If 5% holds on the downside, its a straight shot to 5.5% then 6.75%(2000 and 2001 highs)
Posted by: ItsAWrap at June 19, 2007 12:53 PM
Raphael,
So you are strictly discussing short-term day to day or week-to-week movements in the 30-year rate?
What does your analysis say about medium term movements.
LIke for example where it might be in 6 months to a year.
Also, maybe someone could address where the 1-year Treasury index might be headed?
That would be a key factor in a decision to just let the ARM rate float for a while after the five year lock expires.
Posted by: tripster at June 19, 2007 12:56 PM
stay away from manhattan mortgage and martin hale in particular, they will rob you and hit you up with lots of junk fees and outright lie to you
Posted by: bob at June 19, 2007 1:22 PM
Nobody can rightly tell where rates will be a year from now, there are too many factors. People are watching the fed, but the fed has other things on its plate than the US housing market.
Last year at this time, all the experts were talking about higher rates, coinciding with a peak in the ten yr rate, yet it looked as though rates would go lower, which they did.
In any case, a chart can show you where you've been, and the emotions of buyers and sellers. Anything in the future is pure speculation, and everyone has their favorite way to do that, and to each his/her own (a side note to the ta = whatever...).
As to whether I personally would go for an adjustable or a fixed 30: I would always go for the fixed 30, because the security of a fixed number on the largest expense of owning outweighs the initial savings of the adjustable. The spread would have to be much greater than it usually is to convince me, or else I would have to know for an absolute fact that I was selling before the rate expired. Another thing to look at is the interest only 10 year and 15 year, which are really fixed 30's with interest only in the early part, then a short amortization in the latter part. I priced these recently though, and the rates just weren't low enough not to go with a 30 year fixed and buy it down with a point or more.
To itsawrap: as for a "straight shot to 5.5" all I say is keep an open mind. finding support at former resistance isn't going to propel it anywhere. the markets will in their own time.
Posted by: raphael at June 19, 2007 1:28 PM
I just got a fixed 30 at 6.5, locked in for 60 days. But we're hoping that rates head down in the meantime - I'm just not sure that they will do so that significantly. And we did not do the floating because over time, I don't see rates dropping a lot - it's too much of a risk for my pocketbook to hope for 5.0 and end up with an 8.5.
Posted by: Anon at June 19, 2007 2:30 PM
Low rates are over... for a very long time. It's the end of an era. Lock in now or wait for prices to go down with higher rates later.
Posted by: Rate guru at June 19, 2007 5:26 PM
Bob, I have had good experiences with Victor Angel at Manhattan Mortgage. I'm surprised to hear that they are hitting you with nonsense. But then again, I followed Victor from Universal Mortgage, so maybe they were more ethical. :)
Posted by: Anonymous at June 19, 2007 9:15 PM
Raphael is wrong, 30 year fixed rate is not based on the 10 year treasury, it is based on mortgage backed securities. Inflation concerns and global competition for bond investors (why bond rates jumped when New Zealand raised rates) are what is driving the 30 year fixed rate right now, and the inflation data isn't clear if inflation is really in check.
Rates on 30 year fixed mortgages have been trading in a high point range for the past year, we just dropped below the top range but are testing it.
Advice for someone who is looking at an ARM adjusting in the next 6 - 9 months to the mid 7's or higher, and is planning on being in their home for at least 3 more years, now would be a good time to refinance and lock in the fixed rate. Get someone to help you make the right decision for you who is trained to give this advice, go to the CMPS Institute website and look for a Certified Mortgage Planning Specialist in your state to assist you in this decision process.
Posted by: Karen at June 20, 2007 3:54 PM
The rate on the 30 year fixed, the rate on the ten year treasury, and mortgage backed securities are all related and while they don't move in lockstep, they do move together. The rate on the 10 year is a direct relation to demand for the security, which feeds long rates, and can be affected by demand for or pressure on mortgage backed securities. The dollar figures into this as well, as well as foreign demand for 10 year treasuries, which has kept rates low during the period the fed has been raising the overnight rate.
Posted by: raphael at June 20, 2007 7:43 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.