Open House Picks
Fort Greene
68 Greene Avenue
Brooklyn Properties
Sunday 1-4
$1,699,000
GMAP P*Shark
Windsor Terrace
3 Sherman Street
Douglas Elliman
Saturday 1-3
$1,350,000
GMAP P*Shark
Albermarle-Kenmore Terrace
2112 Albemarle Terrace
Brown Harris Stevens
Sunday 12:30-2:30
$845,000
GMAP P*Shark
Prospect Lefferts Gardens
292 Parkside Avenue
Urban View Realty
Sunday 1-4
$739,000
GMAP P*Shark
86 Comments
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 12:51 PM
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 12:52 PM
why is the ft greene house so cheap? what gives?
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 12:59 PM
Hasnt ft greene house been on the market for a long time?
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 1:00 PM
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing, why so cheap? Maybe needs some serious Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing upgrading.
By anon in S Slope on May 11, 2007 1:03 PM
It's 84 Fenimore in PLG, priced below $700,000. Bob Marvin, what's the deal with that block? Is it landmarked? thanks
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 1:24 PM
Fort Green house way underpriced. So strange
By Peter on May 11, 2007 1:28 PM
The Albermarle house will need a lot of work. I saw it last week. It has a lot of wallpaper on the walls and cielings. The block is very charming and quiet. The surrounding area seems very safe, but is bustling and not all that quiet. Close proximity to the B/Q. If you are willing to do a good amount of work, and can put up with the area, the house and block are definitely unique.
By chopper on May 11, 2007 1:31 PM
FORT GREEN- WTF
Tenants?
Rent Stabilized?
By armchair_warrior on May 11, 2007 1:36 PM
ft green sounds fishy!!!
whats wrong with it?????
By John Ife on May 11, 2007 1:36 PM
Anonymous at 1:04 said: "PLG house will require a ton of work though."
I'm always curious, when people say this apparently based on a few pictures of a seemingly perfectly habitable house, on what basis they are making the statement and where the line is drawn between "required" and "desirable" work.
Obviously stuff like rotting single pane windows, significantly sagging floors, falling masonry, seive-like roofs, decrepit MEP systems and the like are "required". Not quite in the same category, but probably also classifiable as "required" would be kitchens and bathrooms that are incapable of performing up to modern day standards. I just get the impression that a lot of people on this forum put things like replacing unfortunately colored tiles, or getting rid of Home Depot kitchen cabinets on the "required" list. Those are clearly "desired", not "required" things and can be purchased over a period of time as finances allow. Or are we, as a society, so imbued with a sense of entitlement to instant satisfaction that anything but rapidly attainable perfection is just totally unacceptable?
By Bob Marvin on May 11, 2007 1:41 PM
S.Slope,
I'm not sure if it IS #84 (although I've no reason to doubt you). It IS on the south side of Fenimore (which is one-way west). The south side is in neither Lefferts Manor, nor the PLG HD (the boundaries for both are in the middle of the street), but it is a nice street nevertheless.
BTW, the Parkside Ave. house is part of a row that is rather plain, compared to the VERY grand houses further east on that block, but they're still rather nice houses
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 1:46 PM
"Or are we, as a society, so imbued with a sense of entitlement to instant satisfaction that anything but rapidly attainable perfection is just totally unacceptable?"
YES.
By Bob Marvin on May 11, 2007 1:52 PM
BTW the Albermarle-Kenmore Terrace house is part of a row identical to the brick colonial revival houses on Midwood I in PLG and is probably somewhat less costly. This is an interesting, if small, HD off of Church Ave.
By Bob Marvin on May 11, 2007 1:56 PM
"Or are we, as a society, so imbued with a sense of entitlement to instant satisfaction that anything but rapidly attainable perfection is just totally unacceptable?" Shush John, leave well enough alone. That kind of attitude makes for bargains for those of us who are smart enough to see past the superficial :-)
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 2:03 PM
"Why? Why must we always assume the worst about others?"
Lol!! Stick around this blog for a while, 1:59PM, and its posters will show you why.
By John Ife on May 11, 2007 2:05 PM
"I am familiar with the PLG house and am not just talking out of my arse."
So, spill the beans. What's needed? Might save a bunch of people a wasted trip to the open house.
John Ife
By donatella on May 11, 2007 2:07 PM
The Fort Greene house seems like a good deal from what I can see. That little stretch on Greene is very nice and the house is 20' wide. Good they didn't come up with some quick fix for a kitchen. Many people want to do their own kitchen when they buy a house, so the old kitchen is fine. I am not too nuts about the plank/pine (?) in the parlor, but that is fixable.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 2:09 PM
I for one adore "significantly sagging floors." These houses are 100 years plus old--they settled somtime around the turn of the last century and, unless you do something stupid like remove a bearing wall, they really shouldn't settle anymore. And yes, I am an engineer. Sagging and sloping and other forms of settling are the hallmarks of an older home--if you don't appreciate them, go buy a place in One Prospect Park.
By Bob Marvin on May 11, 2007 2:12 PM
Where you'll ONLY have toworry about water running down the inside of your front walls :-)
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 2:13 PM
Hey are you guys talking about the 292 Parkside Ave property? I went to that Open House last weekend and it seemed to be a pretty good deal. Hardly any work at all... Did anyone else see it?
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 2:19 PM
The ft greene house must have rent control tenants in one or probably more of the 3 small apartments in the top two floors.
The broker should disclose this on the website, not just omit "delivered vacant" from the listing.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 2:29 PM
2:19 -- Can a 3 family be rent controlled?
By John Ife on May 11, 2007 2:33 PM
Anonymous, 2:29
Thanks, exactly the clear and precise explanation I (and probably anyone else contemplating viewing the house) was looking for.
By John Ife on May 11, 2007 2:42 PM
Sorry, that reference was meant to be to the 2:25 post. Duh!
By anon on May 11, 2007 2:49 PM
"if you don't appreciate them, go buy a place in One Prospect Park."
just fyi...the name was changed to ON Prospect Park.
classy, huh?
By nosy broker on May 11, 2007 3:04 PM
Yes, a unit in any sized building can be rent controlled--not the same as rent stabilized, which only applies to over 5 unit buildings. Rent controlled apts. have been held by the same lessee since 1972.
By Park Sloper on May 11, 2007 3:04 PM
Actually, I think this is a nice selection of Open Houses. It's spring!
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 3:16 PM
Anyone posting on this board should DEFINITELY know how to spell DEFINITELY. If you find this difficult check out http://www.d-e-f-i-n-i-t-e-l-y.com for assistance.
By Dave on May 11, 2007 3:18 PM
These comments are so confusing! I can't tell which property anyone is talking about. As for the 292 Parkside house, there is no problem with the basement or the supports, and there are no sagging floors. ??? Who worked on this house and when? I've been in it and the house is in great shape, minus cosmetic touches here and there - but overall very solid. Total BS from whoever said they have a "friend" who worked on it - and that doesn't stand for Brownstoner. Get an Engineer.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 3:19 PM
Well it sounds like this particular house does have structural problems. Obviously, when buying an older home you need to get a good home inspection, ideally from a structural engineer. But people should not equate sagging with serious problems--90% of the time it is simply beams that sagged 75 years ago and that are now stable.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 3:20 PM
I went to PLG open house and the house is well priced and in move-in condition. I can't see how a serious buyer with a 800K budget could over look it. With these prices you have to be able to move in and work as you go. I live on the block and have 2 small children. Maybe we're just a little to practical for all the high-rollers out there but this is the type of value that made me relocate our family here from Park Slope, Works for me!
By Dudo on May 11, 2007 3:21 PM
These comments are so confusing! I can't tell which property anyone is talking about. As for the 292 Parkside house, there is no problem with the basement or the supports, and there are no sagging floors. ??? Who worked on this house and when? I've been in it and the house is in great shape, minus cosmetic touches here and there - but overall very solid. Total BS from whoever said they have a "friend" who worked on it - and that doesn't stand for Brownstoner. Get an Engineer.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 3:22 PM
Maybe the name should more accurately be Cater-corner to Prospect Park.
By anon on May 11, 2007 3:25 PM
hey mr b:
check out this article about the finger building and scarano...pay special attention to the last sentence.
http://www.therealdeal.net/breaking_news/2007/05/10/1178835731.php
thought you might enjoy it.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 3:25 PM
"I can't see how a serious buyer with a 800K budget could over look it."
Well, because not all of us are willing to live in that area. I know it has many plusses and I know some people are happy there, but it really isn't the place for me or my family. My point being that the fact that a house is nice and "well-priced" does not automatically mean that everyone in that budget range should want it.
By Dudo on May 11, 2007 3:44 PM
I am an aquaintance of the owner and have been in this house a number of times, including the recent Open House. Was considering it, but there's no rental unit and sadly we can't afford it, although the $739K price is totally fair. No work has been done in the basement because there weren't any problems with floors sagging - and that is according to the owner - I just told her to check this site out. She doesn't know what yous are even talking about. Are you by chance talking about 290 Parkside? And I do rent nearby and have never suffered a gunshot wound of any size comparable to the huge hole in your head where your brain should be.
By John Ife on May 11, 2007 4:01 PM
Damn! There's so much conflicting information on the Parkside place that now I feel compelled to look at it myself. Oh, Brownstoner, thou leach of my leisure time :-)
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 4:04 PM
For those who adore "significantly sagging floors." - what about your closet doors the you have to plane down so they can close. What about the moldings around the closets that are visible uneven - this is somehow much worse than the floor which I don't notice so much.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 4:19 PM
"...what about your closet doors the you have to plane down so they can close. What about the moldings around the closets that are visible uneven..."
You plane down the closet doors. As for the visibly uneven moldings, you learn to love them. Sorry, I just don't understand people who buy old homes but who want them to be perfectly flush. It's unnatural. I have two old homes, one in Brooklyn and one in the country. Both have sloping floors and ceilings and uneven door and window frames. That's part of their beauty and I wouldn't dream of changing them.
By John Ife on May 11, 2007 4:26 PM
Hey, am I calling anyone a liar? Just expressing the fact that I'm intrigued at the diametrically opposed opinions of the basic structural condition of a house coming from people who all claim to a familiarity with it. So intrigued, in fact, that I want to see if my 40 years in the construction business enables me to suss out the truth of the situation via a personal visit. The very first post in this thread on behalf of a competing listing could be a clue to a reason for denigrating the Parkside place just as easily as an owner's anxiety to sell could be a reason for denying defects. Let's call it "CSI PLG".
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 5:05 PM
I know someone that lives on Albermarle Place and their house is great. But this house is overpriced by about 65K.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 8:30 PM
Th Parkside side house is featured in the Sunday Times RE for sale round-up. Got a very positive write-up and looks good. Bet the open house will be jammed.
By Anonymous on May 11, 2007 9:06 PM
Sherman Street house looks underpriced compared to the house another agency had on Sherman recently. What gives? I think the other one was listed at either $1.8m or $1.9m
By Bob Marvin on May 11, 2007 9:52 PM
I just found this article about PLG by accident (while searching for the listing Anon 8:30PM mentioned).I didn't know you could get weekend RE section articles this early:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/13/realestate/13habi.html?_r=1&ref=realestate&oref=slogin
By parkSlopeRenter on May 11, 2007 10:00 PM
I'm chiming in late on the John Ife comment, but I couldn't agree more. Everyone I know who has bought a place put tons more money in renovations before they moved in, none of the stuff was really required to make the place habitable. Good for them I guess, but most of them stretched themselves tremendously to do so. Me, I'd be happy to give an old kitchen or bathroom an excellent scrubdown and build it up over the years the way I want it to be. I think this is a weird thing about our generation -- I'm fairly certain our parents' generation didn't need the instant perfection.
By John Ife on May 11, 2007 11:26 PM
"Can we talk about something interesting now?"
Feel free; go ahead, hopefully with something that has a greater contribution than that comment.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 8:29 AM
Why is 1.7 million for a Fort Green brownstone considered "underpriced"? Why is everyone convinced there must be a rent-controlled tenant? 1.7 is alot of money, not some bargain -- I'm not convinced all those 2+ million homes really sell at that price, or perhaps they are in pristine condition and this one is not (perfectly fine, but not in condition for someone who thinks nothing of shelling out 2 million for a house).
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 8:34 AM
$1.7m is definitely the wrong price for this house. Either it needs tremendous work, or they are trying to generate a bidding war, or they have problems with their tenants like RC. Unless they are just going for a straight up bidding war it would be nice if they disclosed the problems with the house. This agency knows the value of houses in this area. They do not co-broke though so most agents around town won't have a chance to sell it only their agents. Although perhaps they tell sellers they co-broke?? They really never let anybody show their listings.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 8:35 AM
Oops, I take back the above comment. Just looked at the layout of the Fort Green house and the 3rd floor is divided into 2 studios, and the 4th floor is a 3rd apartment. The duplex isn't configured very well for family living either. I think this would take some work to get it into shape, and 1.7 is high, even if it is delivered vacant.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 8:36 AM
Sorry, Anon 8:35am and 8:29 are me, and someone posted in between. I was adding to the 8:29 remark.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 9:41 AM
Enough with your AY ranting. If you have a point (not sure) why don't you try to speak clearly about it instead of just whining like this about AY all the time? AY is a mess. But it's not FG's mess. It's Brooklyn's mess. And the issues most people are concerned with are not their housing prices plummenting. They are concerned with traffic throughout the borough, safety for pedestrians at major intersections around the arena, eminent domain's unlawfulness, the way the politicians ignored the public, the fact that the entire borough needs more schools, the fact that city and state taxpayers are underwriting a project to get a company rich at the expense of landowners who will be pushed out, and so on. Obviously if a developer is going to put up housing he thinks he will make money. And that's why housing prices are not the issue. I would argue the opposite is true. There is already a lot of displacement of poor people in and around Prospect Heights and the addition of luxury housing will only translate in to higher sales prices and higher rents. This is an actual major concern of AY opponents. You rich people will do just fine. But still please oppose AY because it's wrong for the city and wrong for the state.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 9:41 AM
12 years ago you couldn't walk through Ft. Greene without getting a basketball sized gunshot wound in your chest. Now look. Better get on those PLG houses cause in another year or two they'll be over the top. And who in the world thinks $1.7M is a decent price to pay for a house? Wake up. If your making that much $, buy a couple houses somewhere else! I love Brooklyn as much as the next guy, but get real.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 12:16 PM
Better buy in Marine Park before summer or you'll never get in for less than 1M. And if you wait until next year, there are some 1M condos in downtown Glens Falls that'll be 2M.
Of course 1.7M is chump change for a house, isn't everybody making 800K now? And next year they'll be pulling down 1.3M. Every last reader of this blog, no doubt.
This is all very funny ... but what will be funnier still is what these folks will do after emptying their bank accounts and buying a fixer-upper with a liar loan at 10X income -- when prices go down 50%.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 1:25 PM
I'm not sure I understand why, but these AYE posts are growing on me. Maybe it's because all the otherwise or previously sane people have drunk the kool-aid.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 6:02 PM
Nobody is saying anything about Windsor Terrace 2-story being nearly $1.4 million. Isn't that close to Park Slope prices, for per square foot? I knew people liked Windsor Terrace but jeepers, that's higher than I thought WT would be.
By Anonymous on May 12, 2007 10:02 PM
Re: Windsor Terrace--a smaller but very beautiful house on Howard Place (great block but maybe not as nice as Sherman because it fronts the school)just sold for $1.4 million, while there's another very lovely Sherman Street house down the block from this one for sale for over $1.8 million (bigger yard and has an apartment upstairs to defray mortgage, tho not by much).
By anon on May 12, 2007 10:14 PM
There are references to Tiesha Sargent's parents, but not to any siblings. For example:
http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/25/tiesha_sargeant.php
How pathetic that this creep defames her memory by falsly claiming to be her non-existant brother.
By Valerie on May 13, 2007 1:05 AM
I only recently found out about this site and think it is absolutely fantastic. Most of the posts I have read on this site seem to be so helpful and the ones that were not so helpful and sometimes not so nice really gave me a good laugh. Let's be honest, we all have to vent at times but this is absolutely ridiculous and cruel. Maybe if we all were required to post our names and not hide behind "anonymous" the posts would not get so out of hand. For those interested in fighting, venting deep anger and refusing to stick to the topic - go somewhere else and leave the rest of us alone! We are all entitled to our own opinions about where we live and where would like to live but this sounds just plain juvenile and cruel.
By Anonymous on May 13, 2007 7:30 AM
the fort greene house is across the street from the church proposed halfway house. a little scary for a family. could be affecting the price which started way higher almost a year ago. i saw the property and needs work, updating , configurations, etc.
By Brownstoner on May 13, 2007 8:58 AM
FYI, 47 out of 111 comments on this thread were by the same person taking on a number of guises. They have been removed.
By anonymous on May 13, 2007 9:54 AM
Where is Park Slope/Prospect Heights can I get a great steak that isn't $30 for just the steak?
By Becca W on May 13, 2007 10:02 AM
I dated someone with a house on Albemarle Terrace for a while. The nabe is safe enough, though many visitors disagreed--it's 90%+ black, which somehow turns (non-black) people off. But there are no middle-class amenities whatsoever; we couldn't even get decent food delivered. And the homeowners assn people are psycho. I guess if you really want a house and can't get one anyplace else, they are very pretty, but unless you stay inside all the time or just walk to the subway and back, you might not have so much fun there.
By Bob Marvin on May 13, 2007 10:18 AM
"Maybe if we all were required to post our names and not hide behind "anonymous" the posts would not get so out of hand"
Probably true, but also, probably, not practicable--would that it were otherwise.
To get back to actual houses, I had described the Parkside ave house as being "rather plain, compared to the VERY grand houses further east on that block." That is literally true (in the same way that my own house is rather plain, compared to the larger ones, by the same builder, on Midwood I), but I must say that the house doesn't look plain in the NY Times "On the Market" listing on p.3 of today's RE section (which, unfortunately isn't on the web). Two PLG articles in this weeks RE section--the other on P. 1! (I listed a link on Friday).
BTW, there's also a great "Living In" article on WT (p. 7). I looks like the newspaper of record is recognising the "other" nabes bordering Prospect Park" in a big way.
By Anonymous on May 13, 2007 3:43 PM
Bob, the Parkside house in the NYT is on the web--hit On The Market. PErsonally, I'd say this was a very bad press day for PLG. The woman's description of people hanging out on the corners is a mjor turn-off. And, put together, the 2 articles give the definite picture of PLG as a very cheap fringe neighborhood.
By John Ife on May 13, 2007 6:06 PM
Bob,
Go to the Real Estate Section, scroll down to the heading "INSIDE REAL ESTATE" and click on the left hand "On the Market" slideshow picture.
John Ife
By LLS on May 13, 2007 9:53 PM
regarding the FG house - somebody mentioned about the church across the house being turned into a halfway house??? any info...
By Bob Marvin on May 13, 2007 11:12 PM
John,
I found the NYT Parkside listing online--thank you. Strangely, you have to click on "Real Estate' from the Times Select home page. You can't get it by clicking on the RE Section from "Today's Paper." As I said before, the Times website isn't very user friendly, but there IS a lot there.
By Anonymous on May 13, 2007 11:17 PM
Ft Greene house - is very large, and has lots o'details. I have seen many other houses in Ft Greene, Prospect Hgts, Clinton Hill. This one is in good shape.
The interior needs to be painted with prettier colours and it would sell for more.
By Anon on May 14, 2007 8:07 AM
Wonder why Brownstoner never lists these open houses on the site:
http://www.corcoran.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&ListingID=917035&ohDat=
or
http://www.corcoran.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&ListingID=991882&ohDat=
They are right on his block and have had an openhouse the last two weekends. The prices are outrageous! I bet the developer asked him not to.
By Brownstoner on May 14, 2007 8:49 AM
Couple of reasons:
1) We already discussed it here: http://brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2006/11/condo_of_the_da_28.php
2) We don't list condos in the Open House Picks.
So much for you conspiracy theory.
By Bob Marvin on May 14, 2007 8:57 AM
Anon.3:43,
I disagree.IMO the NYT article on the Stenke's house was quite positive. I really liked it.Many ARE initially put off by people hanging out on Flatbush Ave. This article might get some to look past that. Those who cannot do so will not consider PLG in any case. IMO that is their loss--YRMV.
I'm certainly not the only one in the nabe who liked that article--see the May 12th entry in PPLG:
http://planetplg.blogspot.com/
By Anon on May 14, 2007 9:03 AM
Damn Brownstoner couldn't you have just let it last a bit longer? Sorry about that, I stand corrected.
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 9:43 AM
did anyone go to the ft greene house? I'm dying to know what's wrong with it - that price seems a little unreal or perhaps the greed of people selling houses recently has left me jaded to the intentions of a *reasonably* priced home. I just feel like there has to be a catch, especially if its been on the market for a while. maybe the bidding war theory or one of the apartments has a ghost in it or something?!?!
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 10:51 AM
Did anyone go to either of the open houses at 84 Fenimore Street or 292 Parkside Avenue in PLG? If so, please share your thoughts. I wonder if there was a lot of turn out because of the NY Times coverage.
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 12:03 PM
I agree with Bob, that wasn't "negative" in the PLG article to point out how one gets initially turned off by the dudes hanging on the corners. Because it's true! Those dudes are the first thing you see when you step off the subway in PLG. You have to walk past Flatbush before getting to the blocks of historic houses. And we all know what a lovely street Flatbush is. I think it's positive to show even the biggest fans of PLG aren't thrilled about Flatbush.
As for diversity being "negative" to point out about PLG, that's something every individual has to examine about his/her own values and world view.
By Bob Marvin on May 14, 2007 1:10 PM
"As for diversity being "negative" to point out about PLG, that's something every individual has to examine about his/her own values and world view".
Exactly Anon.12:03. Those who are uncomfortable with this probably shouldn't consider PLG--they'd be happier elsewhere. I say this without intending to make any sort of value judgement.
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 2:03 PM
Where is Park Slope/Prospect Heights can I get a great steak that isn't $30 for just the steak?
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 2:04 PM
I've been to Moutarde many times and never had a problem with the service, or the food -- love their food.
I had a very spooky experience at Moutarde once. I was in their ladies' room, which is on the basement level below the dining room. While I was washing my hands, I could very clearly hear a woman moaning right outside the bathroom door. I was thinking, Yikes, someone is about to lose their dinner. So I hurriedly finished my hand-washing and drying, skipped the lipstick application and opened the door to let the person in . . . but there was no one there. (and no, the person had not gone into the men's room). It was spooky. But I still like Moutarde.
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 2:06 PM
Lots of people at 84 Fenimore, but not because of the NY Times...mostly because of THIS WEBSITE
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 2:15 PM
definition of a loser is sonmeone who doesn't have anything better to do than write 47 posts on this thread. I know because I'm feeling a bit like a loser for posting just one.
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 3:15 PM
I am trying to keep this place a secret. But if you want a basic steak dinner you can try Snooky's on 7th. Snooky's itswhat Park Slope used to be. The service is great, the beers are cheap, the wine is bad but the steak special is good. 200 Fifth also has decent steaks, but it can be a bit loud.
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 3:38 PM
12th Street Grill on 12th and 8th Avenue has a great steak, and I am picky about steaks I don't cook myself. Comes with great onion rings -- can't remember if there's a veggie.
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 3:42 PM
The poster above is right - 12th Street has a dee-lish steak with potatoes and onions. Comes with sauteed spinah too and is under $20.
By Dudo on May 14, 2007 4:35 PM
If in Billy'burg and don't want to do Lugers - a really excellent burger or steak is at Sweetwater on N. 6th St betw Berry and Wythe. So great and so reasonable. Sit at the bar. Owner is a great guy and some gorgeous gals go there. Cute boys too. I'm a meat eater fo sho. Did anyone ascertain whether PLG 292 Parkside had bad basement beams or what? Very curious.
By Anonymous on May 14, 2007 6:07 PM
As wary as I am of adding anything to what has probably been one of the most unpleasant and tedious (not to mention strategically/surreptitously redacted) threads in the history of Brownstoner, I'm afraid Mr./Ms. 3:15 needs to get out more: "secret" Snooky's went out of business about six months ago.
By b-boy on May 29, 2007 1:14 PM
I just bought 84 fenimore in PLG because the dumbwaiter is still there. It does need a ton of work & there was a bidding war anyhow. It went for quite a bit over the asking.
Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Anyone going to the open house in PLG shoud DEFINATELY look at this house. It is WAY underpriced. IT has a gorgeous garden in the back
http://www.brooklynhomesales.com/homepage.htm?in_listing=5328199&in_brokercode=XCOM01