Newsletter |

Two Bed Stuy Open Houses Tonight

287halsey0411.jpg 477willoughby0411.jpg
287 Halsey is a four-story, three-family brownstone with quite an elegant facade; we're always a little worried when we see something like this with no photos advertising the fact that it has been recently renovated. But for $745,000, could be worth the subway fare to check it out. Open house tonight from 5:30 to 7. Do you think either of these places sound like they're worth it?
287 Halsey Street $745K [Craigslist] GMAP P*Shark

477 Willoughby is a four-story, four-family brownstone that is, allegedly, "filled with original detail" but in need of renovation. (That front door doesn't augur particularly well, does it?) The asking price is $800,000 but the seller is motivated. Open house tonight from 5 to 6:30.
477 Willoughby Avenue $800K [Craigslist] GMAP P*Shark



27 Comments

By fran on April 11, 2007 11:49 AM

depends on what the rent rolls are.
How many tenants are rent controled versus rent stabilized, how old are they. etc.
These buildings will probably be bought as revenue generating properties, not as someone's family home. Uness they are vacant and can be converted.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 12:10 PM

287 has a nice facade, but missing the cornice.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 12:11 PM

I'm just wondering what would possess a owner to post a picture of a property for sale with two random dudes sitting on the steps. Doesn't anyone follow the rules of, "what to do when putting your house on the market", anymore? Presentation people!!

By SPer on April 11, 2007 12:19 PM

Do apartments in buildings of this size come under stabilization laws? I thought they did not. Fran strikes me as ill-informed.

By anonymous on April 11, 2007 12:19 PM

Halsey house has much better train access - 3 blocks from A express. And the area right around there is very promising; lots of new amenities on Tompkins Ave., Super Foodtown on Fulton, etc. The drawback is that Halsey is 2-way and has buses going by. The exterior is really charming. I disagree with the poster who thinks this would only be used as an income property. There are tons of owner-occupied brownstones in the Stuy and plenty of people who like the whole "owner's duplex + 2 tenants" setup. If you go to the open house, please post. I'm curious about the inside.

By TOM on April 11, 2007 12:25 PM

"Trendy Thompkins Avenue"
Wow am I out of the Loop!

By Fran on April 11, 2007 1:00 PM

Hey those two dudes are your rent-controled tenants. They are part of the deal.
Rent control laws apply to any building with more than two units.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 1:26 PM

Fran,

Where you get the law that says rent control is any building with more than two units?

Here is information on the New York State Rent Control and Rent Stabilization. Am I missing something???

Which apartments are under Rent Control?

The rent control program applies to residential buildings constructed before February, 1947 in municipalities that have not declared an end to the postwar rental housing emergency. There are 55 municipalities that have rent control, including New York City, Albany, Buffalo, and various cities, towns and villages in Albany, Erie, Nassau, Rensselaer, Schenectady, and Westchester counties.

In order for an apartment to be under rent control the tenant must have been living there continuously since before July 1, 1971. When a rent controlled apartment is vacated in NYC or most ETPA localities, it becomes rent stabilized (where the building contains at least six units), or completely removed from regulation.

Which apartments are under Rent Stabilization?

In New York City, apartments are under rent stabilization if they are in buildings of six or more units built between February 1, 1947, and December 31, 1973. Tenants in buildings built before February 1, 1947, who moved in after June 30, 1971, are also covered by rent stabilization. A third category of rent stabilized apartments covers buildings with three or more apartments constructed or extensively renovated on or after January 1, 1974 with special tax benefits. Generally, those buildings are only subject to stabilization while the tax benefits continue or, in some cases, until the tenant vacates.

Outside New York City, rent stabilization applies to non-rent controlled apartments in buildings of six or more units built before January 1, 1974, in the localities which have adopted ETPA in Nassau, Westchester and Rockland counties. Some municipalities limit ETPA to buildings of a specific size- for instance, buildings with 20 or more units, or 100 or more, but in any event, not less than six.

By Fran on April 11, 2007 1:48 PM

I don't know anon, but there are an awful lot of people in NY who have bought houses and cannot get rid of tenants -or spend years doing so. Rent stabilized tenants are as tenacious as rent control tenants. Do you honestly believe you could buy these houses and evict the tenants? Have you ever been to Brooklyn housing court? I have. If you are an owner, you are guily until proven innocent and maybe even then.
I think you may be new to NYC.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 1:53 PM

TOM: Yes, trendy Tompkins Ave. You should check it out. Boutiques, antique shops, and a very cool bakery/coffee shop recently featured in Brooklyn Record.

This is a very desireable part of Bedford-Stuyvesant, and the price of this house is within striking distance of the much smaller HOTD in Kensington.

I live a few blocks from this house and it's a beautiful area, although I don't know this particular block. The building on Willoughby is on a block that's not so pretty, and although it's close to a beautiful park, the public transportation is not nearly as good.

By halsey on April 11, 2007 2:09 PM

I live on Halsey and actually find it's much safer than the 1 way streets - people watch their speed more than on the 1-ways and there's a lot more people on the street at night here.

I feel much better about my child growing up here than on the other streets where the speed demon jerks in their huge escalades zoom by.

And you don't even hear the busses. I know some people who live up around Greene/Van Buren and in the summer it's like a perpetual block party - loud and rowdy all night. I am very happy here.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 2:35 PM

Fran,

Anon 1:26 here. Just wanted to clarify the acuracy "two or more units" part of the rent control statement. Was not debating that rent control tenants, which may qualify under rent regulation passed on by taking over parent's apt, etc was not tough, nor did I suggest evicting a tenant in a regulated apartment.

I happend to be a 25 year resident of Brooklyn and own a 3 family non-regulated building - had one nightmare tenant that I ended up in housing court with last year. Not fun.

anyone else out there want to shed some light on rent control/rent stabilization issues?

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 2:38 PM

Fran, if you believe that rent control laws apply to any building with more than two units, you are quite misinformed. With such misinformation, I assume you did not have a lawyer while in housing court. If you did, I hope you were not paying for such inadequacy.
Affordable housing advocates and rent regulated tenants would love the laws if there were as you incorrectly believe them to be.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 3:36 PM

Many of the row houses in our area became rooming houses and are subject to SRO regulations. Still occupying these units are mostly an elderly population, many of whom just do not want to move no matter how much the offer to vacate is and thus some owners have just remodeled around their rooms. Re: eviction -- Regardless of the rent regulation status it is not easy and the suggestion to hire a specialist attorney is good advice.

By fran on April 11, 2007 4:50 PM

Yes, SRO regs cover many tenants living in brownstones from Brooklyn Heights to Bed Stuy. Whatever the term you use, existing tenants are forever. As a landlord, you will never be able to bring their rents up to anything apporaching market rates. In fact older people pay only a fraction of their very low rent and the landlord then has to wait -sometime for months- for the supplemental checks from the city.
Call it what you like, I call it rent control, it's a fact of life whether you buy an apartment building or a brownstone with only a couple of units.
Only two-family houses are truly exempt.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 5:04 PM

Fran,

Alot of people have illegal apts, mostly basement apartments. Tenants move in and when they realize the apt is illegal, they practically blackmail the owner and hold it over their head. Although the apt is illegal, if they report the tenant, the owner is subject to fines. That's what creates the nightmare situation for many owners.

By anonymous on April 11, 2007 5:16 PM

Fran, I think you are confusing people about a few separate issues. "Rent control" refers to a very specific set of laws in NYC that only apply to certain buildings. Ditto "rent stabilization" which is similar but less extreme. SRO's have their own set of particular regulations, and personally I would not buy a building with an SRO certificate of occupancy. (But I don't believe either of these buildings are SRO's.)
What you're referring to however is simply the fact that even when no special regulations apply, existing tenants in NYC can be extremely difficult to get out from any building. This is very true. Been there, done that, hope never to do it again.
However that's not to say that the only good buy is a vacant building. Far from it! You just have to do your due diligence, figure out if people are paying their rent on time, how long they've been there, etc. and make a judgment call just like you would if you went out and got your own tenant. Furthermore, buying out a tenant, evicting a non-paying tenant, etc. are stressful and expensive propositions but still worth it for some buyers who are getting a great deal.

By content on waiting on April 11, 2007 5:58 PM

Personally, I think anyone would be crazy to buy in Bed-Stuy right now. While people may legitimately debate whether a market downturn will greatly affect prices in Park Slope, Fort Greene, and other prime areas of Brooklyn, the subprime and foreclosure wave will no doubt have a huge effect on areas like Bed-Stuy and Crown Heights. All you have to do is look at the charts of foreclosures over at the Daily News website to see Bed-Stuy is being inundated with foreclosures. What affect will it have on a property listed for 750K when you can get a foreclosure on the same block for 600K. It seems best to wait 6-12 months to see how this all shakes out before buying in these more marginal neighborhoods.

By anon on April 11, 2007 7:49 PM

fran clearly does not know what she is talking about and is confusing everyone that is reading her posts. rent stabilized tenants are usually found only in buildings with 6 families and above built before a certain date (info easily googled). rs tenants are subject to rent increases, although this rate is regulated by some government agency. the latest increase was 7+ percent for a two year lease. these tenants are incredibly hard to evict and nearly impossible if they are 62+ years of age.
rent controlled tenants are much rarer compared to rent stabilized tenants and must have resided in their apartment since the 1950s? Again, all this info can be googled. RC tenants cannot be evicted, although i'm hoping someone can prove me wrong. RC rents cannot be increased, although once the tenant leaves, the rent can be boosted to market value, while for a RS tenant, the rent can only be increased 20%. there are a bunch of loopholes for RS tenants, but too lengthy to discuss.

By Fran on April 11, 2007 8:16 PM

Let me confuse you further, many houses that originally housed one family were altered to house six or more rental tenants. Any tenants left over from those days, even if it is only one, is still rent regulated.
There are obviouly realtors or other interested parties on this blog who want to lessen the negative consequebecs of buying a house with regulated tenants. Don't believe them.
As I wrote in my first posting, the price you pay has to correspond to the rent roll and to whether the tenants are rent regulated. These prices are way too high if these houses have rent regulated tenants. I'm sorry if I'm annoying the seller or whoever, but it's the truth.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 9:27 PM

I love it! More foreclosure means more gentrification in Bed-Stuy! Yes, bring it on and let's weed out the "less capable"!!! A massive foreclosure wave in Bed-Stuy is just the what the nabe needs after ten consecutive years of rapid appreciation. The subprime mortgage crisis will bring prices down a bit but not as much as some would like. Nevertheless, it will definitely bring about more gentrification which is in the long term interest of the nabe and the stable homeowners who can ride the temporary downturn in the market. I'm excited. There's nothing better for a "marginal neighborhood" than more turnover!

By content on waiting on April 11, 2007 10:18 PM

That's an interesting analysis 9:27, never heard anything like that before. I admit my calling Bed-Stuy a marginal hood was disparaging to the fine people who have worked hard to raise the neighborhood from the ghetto that it once was, but the wave of foreclosures is not going to help it. I think its going to set the neighborhood back ten years, unfortunately. But I hope I'm wrong.

By Anonymous on April 11, 2007 10:47 PM

My husband was inside 287 Halsey a few months ago. The broker, Jeanne (she pronounces it Jeann-e) was not very professional and couldn't even get into a couple of the apartments to show them. Actually, I believe she only showed him one floor. It was partially renovated with only few remaining details. She talked about doing more renovation -- I believe she is the owner as well as the broker -- and perhaps she has done so before hosting the open house, but I wouldn't expect it to be a quality job. She's not from Bed-Stuy, by the way, and didn't seem to know the neighborhood (we've been here two years, and, yes, Halsey Street has good subway access and there are good eateries on Halsey and Throop as well as the trendy shops of Tomkins).

By Anonymous on April 12, 2007 9:29 AM

anon 7:49 wrong on couple points - RC tenants also receive rent increases just as RS do.
And if RC tenant leaves apt in building otherwise not subject to RS (less than 6 units) apt is decontrolled.
And who ever said any of these houses have a RC tenant? It is rather rare to have any rent control in this size house at this time although it is possible.

By anonymous on April 12, 2007 9:53 AM

Fran, some of your information is good but some is plain wrong. So far there is no indication that either of these buildings has a rent-controlled or rent-stabilized tenant of any kind and for you to say unsubstantiated things like "Oh, those guys sitting on the stoop are your rent-controlled tenants" is just insane.

By Anonymous on April 12, 2007 11:09 AM

287 Halsey -- stopped by last night. Could not see lower duplex as tenant was not home and broker apparently needed tenant there to show apartment. Middle apartment is unrenovated but habitable. Top apartment is renovated. New flooring in top apartment and hallway -- unattractive wood tile. Hallways painted unattractive yellow. Building would be delivered vacant.

By Anonymous on April 12, 2007 10:53 PM

Viewed 287 Halsay last weekend. Broker is owner/flipper. Not very professional (rehab and broker). Top unit was redone (but strangely they did not update the tiny bathroom), i'm guessing $1100-1300 for rent. Second floor needs a total reno - had drop down ceilings, this aweful stucco type material on walls and ceiling (like giant "popcorn") - currently rents for $640. Needs cosmetic updates to make it rentable - I'm guessing it could rent for $1250-$1450 (maybe). Duplex unit was not available for viewing, but was told it needs updating. Depending on size and renovation, i've seen nice duplexs in BS rent for $2350

Observations: This was a cheap rehab to sell building. There is no cornice (which is noticable compared to the other houses around it - also makes it look cheap). For $745k you still need to do a little work, I don't believe the plumbing or electric was upgraded. Numbers could work if you want to own/live/rent or buy/rent. But not by much. Rent 2 units and live in duplex for less that $2000/month.
Blended 5/1 IO at WAMU: $700k at 6.85% is about $4000/month.

(ps - i've been looking for the past 10 months and have seen nearly 100 buildings. I talk to tenants, landlords and brokers about where rents are). 'nuff said.

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Related Posts with Thumbnails