« Half Sold, 99 Gold Throws in the Towel, Goes Rental After Three Strikes, Is Recent Bed-Stuy Arrival Out? »
April 26, 2007
Proposed Extension of Clinton Hill Historic District

Behold the map of the proposed extension of the Clinton Hill Historic District. (Click on the map for a larger version.) The biggest news, at first glance, is the expansion south of Fulton to include the two long blocks of Lefferts Place. Lots of other goodies in there too. The only thing on our wish list would be the row of buildings on the north side of Fulton between Clinton and Waverly (photo on the jump.)

Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/1037
Comments
I agree about the Fulton Street buildings between Clinton and Waverly (those places with the iron facades). I think they were considered, but it looks like they might not be on the table in this version of the map - looks like their boundary was erased. Also the old "Coal and Ice" building that is a methadone clinic now, on the opposite corner from those iron facade buildings, is nice too with its curved corner and large windows.
However, you have to pick your battles, and in light of the pending upzoning of Fulton and downzoning of residential blocks, I think it is a fair compromise (not ideal imo, but fair and logical). Plus, I understand that much study and consultation with Andrew Dolkart went into this to make it as palatable as possible for the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
The area south of Fulton is already a district registered on the National Register of Historic Places as the "Clinton Hill South Historic District", and is still well preserved so it should hopefully be landmarked easily. It has some of the older homes in the neighborhood generally (freestanding houses from the 1850s and row houses from the early 1860s, along with row houses, churches and mansions from later in the 19th century, and some early 20th century small apartment buildings). The row houses were built quite early by real estate developers in response to the Fulton Street omnibus service that could transport residents who worked in lower Manhattan to the Fulton Ferry to get to work. Some things never change!
Posted by: lp at April 26, 2007 10:24 AM
So Myrtle is the cut-off? They want to change the zoning north of Myrtle to preserve the wood frames there but not include them in the historic district?
Or are they splitting Wallabout off from Ft Green/Clinton Hill and making it a separate district?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 26, 2007 10:29 AM
wallabout will be a separate historic district and i think it might be up before this one.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 26, 2007 10:34 AM
There are a bunch of really beautiful brownstones on the west side of Grand Ave. between Greene and Gates that are not included. I wonder why. In the middle of the block there are a few narrower brownstones, one of which was covered in blue vinyl siding last year. And the building at 309 that was torn down a couple of months ago was a loss.
Posted by: rf at April 26, 2007 10:38 AM
Whoops, sorry, I just took a closer look at the map, and the aforementioned Grand Ave. brownstones are included.
Posted by: rf at April 26, 2007 10:41 AM
Why not extend the boundary to include Gates up to Classon?
Posted by: Anon at April 26, 2007 11:45 AM
i may be biased, but the rest of washington between fulton and atlantic would be nice. you could leave out the used car lot and the new development, but brownstones and cathedral condos on the corner of washington and atlantic are pretty "historic"
Posted by: Dahlia at April 26, 2007 1:07 PM
Whose map is this? Is it a local group's proposal or from LPC?
Posted by: Halden at April 26, 2007 1:22 PM
Dahlia, have a look at the map, that part of Washington is covered, including the cathedral condos.
Posted by: lp at April 26, 2007 2:01 PM
lp-
Thanks for the information. I've always had questions about certain thing around that area and I appreciate you filling me in.
Posted by: Gary at April 26, 2007 3:59 PM
You're welcome. I only know because I live there and have a copy of the old historic register report describing the houses, builders, dates etc. Interesting stuff if your into that.
Posted by: lp at April 26, 2007 4:58 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.