Newsletter |

House of the Day: Willow Place on the Cheap

39willowpl.jpg
The same person has owned this brick townhouse at 39 Willow Place in Brooklyn Heights since 1974, which might explain why it's priced so cheaply. The photos in the listings, however, show that the house is in decent shape, though certainly lacking the jaw-dropping interiors of some houses in the area. Still, $2.5 million for a 25-footer in Brooklyn Heights? Not only that, but the price was dropped from $2,775,000 within ten days of it hitting the market earlier this month. What gives? What's the catch?
39 Willow Place [Brown Harris Stevens] GMAP P*Shark
Price Cut [Natefind]



94 Comments

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:06 PM

Seems like a real catch to me -- Willow Place is a quite beautiful street, and the extra width of this house is a godsend if you renovate.

--an architect in Brooklyn

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:12 PM

It went to a final-closed bid last night. Twelve bids-defintely over 3Mio-but not sure how high

By anon on April 19, 2007 12:25 PM

Wow!
This is a gem.
Great house, great neighborhood.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:27 PM

ugh bidding wars are soooo summer of 2005. nice house.

By anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:29 PM

a steal!!
i'd have priced nearer to 4 million.

By anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:35 PM

It's not a steal, considering the work involved. Willow is the Street, along with Columbia, Joralemon and State that suffer continued problems with structural damage due to the BQE and subway running underneath. This area is known as Willowtown and any broker in the area (I'm not one, by the way) will tell you that the houses here will always be priced cheaper because of the problem caused by the subway and BQE. Some people don't care though, but this house wasn't worth 3mil.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:40 PM

The one across the street was priced at 1.8 in january -- same layout roughly.

The R/S tenants across the street pay virtually nothing.

Sooner or later, the state st garage is going to go condo.

And this is _STILL_ a 10+ minute walk (uphill) to stores, subway, etc.

By anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:41 PM

interesting...having lived on joralemon for the past 11 years, i have heard of no such thing, 12:35.

i always find it so interesting when people make up stories to try to sabatoge or make someone feel like they overpaid.

truly sad.

my mother has been on the brooklyn heights block association for the last 30 years. just asked her about this and she didn't have a clue as to what you were talking about.

By anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:44 PM

I think this is a case of a savvy broker pricing a property worth considerably less than 2.5 (i.e. a house which needs complete rewiring, new boiler, roof, etc.)at such a level to provoke a bidding war. It seems to have worked. Considering prices in Cobble Hill (up to 2.85+), this looked like a steal. The same broker approach worked with the house on Columbia one block over that went on the market for 1.6 last April, sold for 1.8 in June and went back on the market for 1.995 in September where it has sat for the past six months. Buyer got burned badly.

By anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:47 PM

Really 12:41? Why don't you go and talk to any broker in the area and they'll tell you the same: subway noise underneath these houses is a nuisance and causes structural damage. The Willow Street house which sold for $1.7 advertised reinforced steel beams as part of its sales-pitch. I looked at the house on Columbia and was unnerved by the constant noise of the subway running underneath every five minutes, so please don't try to pull the wool over discerning buyers' eyes. Don't worry, though, buyers from out of town who don't live in the Heights aren't generally apprised of such things, so you'll get your price when YOU sell.....

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:51 PM

Maybe it's just me, but that much money for something so blah and free of detail? I don't know, maybe the width makes all the difference but there are McMansions with more detail than this place.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 12:53 PM

It's not underpriced. Everything on the marker is overpriced. Speculators have driven prices up to the point that every
person, not in the business, believes their domain is worth twice its value.You will find some broker to stroke your fantasy. Yes, the stock market, and the hedge funds have driven prices up in Manhattan. Most people who grew up in Manhattan, need the city for nourishment,Brooklyn won't do. Most people who have bought in Brooklyn over the last ten years don't seem to recognize this fact. I have a small place in Manhattan, my kids are grown, and we bought a huse house with eighty acrs a historic barn , four car garage, two ponds, and a gazebo for half the price of a Brooklyn Heights studio.
I am surrounded by my frinds, artists, writers and musicians from the city. No we won't tell you the town, we don't want you or your inflated prices to hit our town. There is no starbucks so I know we are safe for awhile.
What if you can't sell your house for what you paid for it three years ago, how will that change your life. What if
your house is worth only half what you paid. All you people who moved into neighborhoods other than Bklyn. Hts, what was your frame of reference when you paid too much, a broker who told you prices would go higher. Clearly, many of you have overpaid. Yes I am a real estate broker, and I will tell you a secret: Brooklyn has a three tier pricing system. The kid from Chicago who just sold his one bedroom in the city and has profit in his hand will pay more than a person in the know, who will pay more than a real estate broker looklng for a bargain. I might spend five hundred thousand for a fiser upper in Boerum Hill you might spend 1.5M Is my house underpriced, or is your house overpriced.

By bob999 on April 19, 2007 1:01 PM

Focus, folks--enough rambling about your bucolic farm in whereverthefuck. Willow Street house, please? I find the allegations of structural problems caused by the subway and the BQE suspect; is there one additional, non-anonymous person who can back that up? This place looks like it's had some detail stripped out somewhere over the years, but it's nice and fat, and beautiful from the front, and it's in the fanciest neighborhood in the borough. If it's true that there was a bidding war, it obviously has something going for it. Anyone (brokers?) know of comparable sales?

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 1:13 PM

Is it just me or does any else realize that there are no subway lines in that part of BH at all? All the lines run well east of that area....so I guess Henry Street is about to come crashing down. Maybe he's confusing it with the rumble of double wide strollers

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 1:16 PM

bob999, I haven't posted before, but 25 footers are incredibly expensive -- cobble hill houses that wide are running more than 3 million dollars. Why do you think this is priced so cheaply (relatively speaking)? There's been lots of discussion on this board before about those streets near the bqe/subway, so, while I have no direct knowledge, there is probably a catch with the location. The very same realtor is listing a significantly smaller house on DeGraw for more than this price (see yesterday's discussion). Why else is this much lower than other houses? My guess is it is the location. Unless Carroll Gardens has become way more expensive than Brooklyn Heights these days.

By anon on April 19, 2007 1:18 PM

i understand it was a very motivated seller.

and that they priced low to initiate a bidding war.

looks like it worked.

By C Hicks on April 19, 2007 1:26 PM

The 4 and 5 run under Joralemon and part of Columbia. It's actually called the Joralemon Street Tunnel. If you live on Hunts Lane and Remsen, you can also hear a low rumble. Subways also run under Montague and Pineapple or Cranberry, so there are certain areas of the heights where this is more noticeable than others. That said, Joralemon is on an incline and other posts in the past have suggested there is a structural problem to do with the road caving from underneath. I don't know whether this is true or not but it has been asserted.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 1:27 PM

Interesting, 12:53, that you're still spending time on a Bklyn-focused web site like brownstoner when you are so happily ensconced in Green Acres. Not much else to do up there, eh? Or is it just a 'professional' interest?

By anon on April 19, 2007 1:58 PM

hey geniuses, instead of arguing try some simple googling:

http://www.willowtown.org/

By anon on April 19, 2007 1:59 PM

hey geniuses, instead of arguing try some simple googling:

http://www.willowtown.org/

By bored at work on April 19, 2007 2:01 PM

As a former MTA employee, I can confirm the comment by C Hicks. There are East-West tunnels at Joralemon (IRT), Montague (BMT), and Cranberry (IND). I have never heard, however, of complaints of structural damage. At Joralemon in this area, the subway tunnel is far underground. One may hear rumblings, but not much more.

Dont have much to add about the price, but its in the Heights and 25' wide. Even if its a total wreck, its worth lots.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 2:02 PM

With regards to 12:53 - is it possible to install, in addition to typekey, a village idiot filter?

Everyone's entitled to their opinions etc. but wtf is the value in that paragraph of drivel?

I am well aware that I can buy half of columbia county for what I paid for my brownstone but there's a reason!

By sba on April 19, 2007 2:04 PM

anon 1:59pm gets the "voice of reason" award hands down.

By anon on April 19, 2007 2:12 PM

voice of reason for linking a website??

there is a very big difference between the rumbling of a subway train and structural damage as was posted earlier.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 2:25 PM

I looked at some of the comps and this price is in line. Willow Place is not Willow Street. It is down the hill, close to the highway. If you look at comps for brownstones in Central Heights they are over 4 million, but in north Heights you can get cheaper places. I think anyone interested in figuring out whether it is overpriced should take a walk over there. It is a hike up the hill to the train, stores etc.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 2:31 PM

Is there a huge difference in quality between 20' and 25' wide brownstones?

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 2:33 PM

I think this just shows how overpriced some neighborhoods are.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 2:33 PM

I think this just shows how overpriced some neighborhoods are.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 2:40 PM

I would not purchase a home on Willow Place period, or on State or Joralemon below Hicks.

If you live in the Heights you would know this. Only people moving from elsewhere would purchase a home below Hicks between Joralemon and State.

By hola on April 19, 2007 2:42 PM

there is no way brooklyn heights is cheaper than carroll gardens.... Carroll gardens is blue collar and the heights is white collar

By joe on April 19, 2007 2:44 PM

I also heard of structural problems on Joralemom street due to the tunnels and rumblings. I read it somewhere online a year ago from one of the brownstone owners. Never heard of problems on Willow Place but it doesn't mean problems don't exist.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 2:59 PM

Take a vote for idiot of the day- choices below.
Probably all the same loser made all 3 comments.

" Only people moving from elsewhere would purchase a home below Hicks between Joralemon and State."

"Carroll gardens is blue collar and the heights is white collar"

"All you people who moved into neighborhoods other than Bklyn. Hts, what was your frame of reference when you paid too much, a broker who told you prices would go higher. Clearly, many of you have overpaid. Yes I am a real estate broker, and I will tell you a secret: Brooklyn has a three tier pricing system"

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 3:02 PM

"Is there a huge difference in quality between 20' and 25' wide brownstones?"

There's a huge difference in flexibility for renovation. A 25-wide means there's enough space for e.g., a powder room on the parlor floor w/o taking space from a traditional front/back parlor combination. Also, a kitchen can be paired with a real dining space in the back -- this is otherwise something of a squeeze.

--an architect in Brooklyn

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 3:04 PM

"I would not purchase a home on Willow Place period, or on State or Joralemon below Hicks.

If you live in the Heights you would know this. Only people moving from elsewhere would purchase a home below Hicks between Joralemon and State."

When we were looking to buy, that was the only area that interested us. Seemed less, I dunno, pretentious than up the hill.

By jake on April 19, 2007 3:09 PM

i vote for number one. it's simultaneously smug and a lie--a smie if you will.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 3:29 PM

I live on Pierrepont and would LOVE a house in willowtown. I know of a couple of houses that have had some issues but those are the older (pre-1900) places right above the IRT

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 3:53 PM

so, it's been sold, I take it?

By lp on April 19, 2007 3:57 PM

As far as the width of the row house goes, its not a difference in "quality", rather a significant difference in the interior feel and potential layout of a place. I live in a 22.5 foot wide place and those extra 2-3 feet (beyond the more typical 19 - 20 foot wide places) makes an enormous difference in terms of the layout of rooms, ability to have: a real kitchen/dining area on the parlor floor,; a small powder room on the parlor floor under the stairs (as the architect above noted) - and to just avoid that long skinny railroad room feel.

Then again, in especially narrow houses, there are often central stair cases which often successfully prevent the living spaces from being too narrow.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 4:22 PM

Or the more reason to live "down the hill"...less of a douche factor

By anonymous on April 19, 2007 4:25 PM

where is the proof that this has sold for over 3 mil? it's nice for the owner if it has, but, perhaps, a gun has been jumped? also, who's to say the owner didn't post that original feed?

By JohnR on April 19, 2007 4:39 PM

The house went well above the asking price of $2.5 mln. Also, there was an inaccuracy in Brownstoner's post. It was not originally listed for $2.775 mln. The original price was $2.5 mln, but it was mistakenly changed to $2.775 mln when pictures and floorplan were posted last Wed.

In any case, there were several bidders and it went well above ask. Those are the facts. Also, I would note, the house needed a total gut renovation. There was just about no original details remaining other than the marble mantles, stairway banister and spindles, and some crown moulding on the parlor floor. It definitely looked better from the outside than the inside. The backyard was raw and needed landscaping, although it was large and had great potential.

If you figure $250/sf construction cost for a reasonably high end renovation, you have to add $1.1 mln plus architectural and other fees to the price plus the cost of financing during construction. In the end, the buyer of the home will end up paying around $4.5mln if they choose to do a high-end job. However, I do not know the final price, so that number could actually be higher. (One poster above said that it went above $3mln. If so, then the final cost of the house could be higher than $4.5mln if they do a reasonably high-end reno.)

By the scarab on April 19, 2007 4:46 PM


Nuts

and more Nuts

what else is there to say?

I guess the bankers have to put their loot someplace!

By anon on April 19, 2007 5:38 PM

for all of you that think this price is absurd, check out curbed.com today.

yes, this townhouse (see below) is in the west village, but come on...

makes this place literally look like a bargain basement price...
that's how brooklyn is able to ask these prices at this point in time.

What/Where: Townhouse, Bank btwn W. 4th & Bleecker
Square Feet: n/a, but see floorplans after the jump
Asking: $13.9 million

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 6:02 PM

Why not 100 mil 2-beds and $75 pints of beer? If ya can't pay, stop using air other people need, won't you?

Thank God somebody's got the decency to lead the cheers as we go ever onward and upward.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 6:16 PM


5:38pm,

you can still get a Federal style 1855 25 foot wide brick townhouse in Allentown, PA (hour and half drive from nyc) for less than 200k.

what's your point?

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 6:48 PM

Yup, 6:16, here's a townhouse in Allentown that's got to be at least a 25 footer. http://media.rapmls.com/lvarmls/listingpics/tmbphoto/048/269048.jpg. Good point!

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 6:50 PM

Woops - 6:48 here. Here's the link to the Allentown house.

http://media.rapmls.com/lvarmls/listingpics/tmbphoto/048/269048.jpg

By Jo on April 19, 2007 6:50 PM

5:38

Actually that listing is two houses on the same lot. Just saying....

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 7:10 PM


Sorry, but they have the same old townhouses, same fireplaces, everything, that you folks love in NYC in Allentown for less that 200k. I've seen them.

So much for feeling superior!

By John on April 19, 2007 7:14 PM


Lived on State Street, just by Willow for 15 years. Never heard of the subway being an issue - BUT is the BQE noise heard?

Even so, for a 25 footer in the Heights, that's a very low asking price.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 7:23 PM

And Billy Joel wrote songs about them both! And I can tell you the Piano Man knows Allentown Man doesn't want him around, anyhow. Maybe with all one could save you could afford a helicopter share in Pennsy, but unfortunately Allentown comes with the lovely house.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 7:25 PM


Here's a cute one in Allentown that just sold for under 135k.

It's small, but I often see houses twice as big for closer to 200k that look just like the one discussed here but with much more detail. Check out this cheap house. Moldings, doors, and fireplaces are on par with the stuff you folks claim is worth millions!

Somebody is getting seriously ripped off!


http://www.trulia.com/property/1033352710-321-N-Franklin-St-Allentown-PA-18102

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 7:28 PM

25' Brownstone on Willow Place goes for $3mm. If it were in any other part of Brooklyn Heights it would easily sell for over $4mm.

Why? Put 2 and 2 together.

By anon on April 19, 2007 7:39 PM

comparing houses in brooklyn heights to allentown is absolutely assinine! what are you talking about? you've never heard that real estate is about location location location? no one wants to live in pa. it's a dump. there's a reason why the places are 200K. most of the people are missing a chromosome, there's very little to do and it's in one of the most horrible states in the u.s. have you ever BEEN to allentown? most of pa looks as if it were designed by elmer fudd.

and i believe the point about the west village place was not necessarily that it should be 13 million or whatever, but the fact that literally less than a mile away you can find a great one for 3 million in a superb neighborhood, i don't think it's that bad.
all relative, of course.

quit it with the allentown talk. it makes you all look like fools.

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 8:02 PM


Allentown is an hour and a half drive from the city. It takes an hour for many people in Park Slope to commute to their jobs in Manhattan.

Allentown isn't that bad. It looks like most of Brooklyn. Certainly your odds of getting mugged are about equal in either local.

I agree location, location, location . . . that's why the house in the West Village is priced so much higher than the one in Brooklyn. Ten years ago the price ratio between the two was about the same.

If you think somebody is getting a deal in Brooklyn buying that house, you're nuts. Three million (plus a million to renovate) AND a commute!!! Are you kidding? In the West Village you can roll out of bed and be in the best neighborhood in the world by stepping outside.

I love Brooklyn, but I'm no sucker.

By EJ on April 19, 2007 8:16 PM

It takes me 25 minutes, door-to-door to commute to my office from (north) Park Slope.

Who the *(*^ wants to live in Allentown?

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 8:23 PM


It's all about the commute. Lots of Park Slope folks spend about an hour commuting to Manhattan.

100,000 people live in Allentown and even more in neighboring Bethleham. What's your point?

Are folks who live outside NYC not people?

By Anonymous on April 19, 2007 8:26 PM


I've been saying prices in NYC would fall for years and it hasn't happened. Does that mean it won't happen? No, it means it hasn't happened yet.

3 million for a fixer upper in Brooklyn Heights is plain wack. Try to rent the place and you'll still be out of pocket at least 10k a month towards your mortgage.

It's nuts plain and simple.

By the scarab on April 19, 2007 8:35 PM


it's not nuts if your goal is to show off and you're willing to spend anything to do. of course, most families would be perfectly happy living somewhere cheaper. the point is there are rich people who don't care if the house makes sense as an investment or not. they want to show off to their friends and are willing to spend anything to do so.

just my opinion

By a non owner on April 19, 2007 8:41 PM

There was a great article in last week's New Yorker about extreme commuting. After reading it, it's hard to figure who's more insane, somebody who'd do a 4-hour round-trip commute (yep, it'll take that long, I once lived in next-door Bethlehem, though not while working here!) or your typical 500K-a-year whatever "stretching" to get into this fine fixer-upper. Plenty of Picasso sketches or baseball cards one could invest in with better odds of appreciation.

By Dave on April 19, 2007 8:53 PM

7:39
Pennsylvania isn't a state. Fact. Check it. It's a commonwealth. Respect, though, everything else you said was on the money. Allentowner is another blog. This is Brownstoner (Yay!). :)

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 8:24 AM

Who the hell was an hour long commute to Manhattan?

It takes half an hour to get to Midtown--less if you work downtown. That's why Park Slope is so pricey.

If it takes you an hour to get to work from Park Slope, you must work for Columbia U.

By Jessica on April 20, 2007 8:58 AM

The value of a thing is simply what people are willing to pay for it... the more people willing to pay that price, the firmer the value. Is a designer dress "worth" $5,000? Maybe not intrinsically, but if enough people are willing to pay $5,000, then that's what it's worth.

To the people who are talking this down:
1) If you own in the neighborhood, you should only be happy about people willing to pay higher prices, because it raises the value of your property;
2) If you bid on this property and did not win, you are just bitter;
3) If you own in another neighborhood, you are also bitter that Brooklyn Heights prices are moving the way they are;
4) If you are in no way involved, then why are you so obsessed as to spend your time blogging this site?

For disclosure - I saw the house (which is more than most of you can say). I brought an architect friend who thought very highly of it. I bid on it. Who are the rest of you?

By Drew on April 20, 2007 9:15 AM

The Allentown comments don't make much sense to me. Obviously there are old townhouses throughout the northeast, but to suggest an hour and a half commute by car rivals one subway stop from downtown Manhattan is absurd. It's not about feeling superior, it's about owning a large house close to Manhattan that doesn't cost 10 million or more like the ones actually in Manhattan.

By JohnR on April 20, 2007 10:21 AM

Jessica:

I am JohnR (see posting from April 19, 2007 4:39 PM.

I too looked at the house and agree that it has a lot of potential. Location is very nice. There are no subways running underneath as some people speculated above. There are 4400 square feet of space, which is nicely proportioned because of the 25' width.

In my opinion, the house will have to be nearly gutted to bring it up to a high standard with all new plumbing, electrical, central air and finishes. Whether or not floors would have to be replaced is an unknown -- who knows what lies beneath the modern oak strip floors? The windows also need replacing.

As I noted in my original posting, if I were to renovate this house to a high standard that would be expected by buyers in the Heights, I calculate that the final net cost would be somewhere between $4.2mln - $4.5mln (depending on the actual selling price, which is unknown to me).

What would one get for $4.5 mln? A magnificient, newly renovated and restored 25' wide townhouse in Brooklyn Heights -- a rarity. That is around $1000 per square foot, which is very much within a reasonable range for the neighborhood. Actually, $4.5mln is closer to prices that existed in mid-2006 for a similar sized renovated townhouse in the Heights.

I reject all the nonsense on this site about the supposed idiocy of paying $4mln for a house in the Heights. Value is determined by both those doing the valuing and the thing that is being valued. 39 Willow Place was packed with potential buyers when I looked at it. And it appears that many of them put in actual bids. Obviously, there were many people who placed a high value on this house given its potential and location.

By Jessica on April 20, 2007 11:09 AM

JohnR,
Thanks for you thoughtful, informed and sane comments. Now I know that I am not crazy (or at least not alone) in thinking that the value is near what you're saying.

By the scarab on April 20, 2007 11:12 AM


JohnR,

Your 10:21am post will be a prime example used of "irrational exuberance" when the market "corrects."

You mention that Manhattan townhouses are 10 million. Just three years ago I almost bought a landmark townhouse with a big yard listed by Corcoran in Soho for 1.7million.

I strongly believe townhouse prices in Manhattan and Brooklyn will decline 50% in the next couple years.

Only time will tell . . .

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 11:18 AM


Claiming $1000/sq ft is a good deal is nuts for a townhouse across the river from Manhattan far from Prospect Park.

Just cause brokers bark something in your ear enough times doesn't make it true!

And I live in a building I own in lower Manhattan -- I don't rent!

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 11:30 AM

Nobody knows what the market is up to. It could go either way, hence the anxiety and aggression (on both sides) on this thread.

- a psychoanalyst in Manhattan

By anon on April 20, 2007 12:43 PM

"I strongly believe townhouse prices in Manhattan and Brooklyn will decline 50% in the next couple years."

yes, because there is such a precedent for this in the real estate industry. i would agree that the latest news of a continued growing economy, a million new residents, inflation under control as well low lending rates and unemployment would lead you to this conclusion.

moron.

By JohnR on April 20, 2007 1:37 PM

I may regret this, but I'll briefly respond to scarab at April 20, 2007 11:12 AM.

First, I would ask you to actually read my posting. I did not even mention "Manhattan townhouses are 10 million." I talked exclusively about Brooklyn Heights.

Second, if you do re-read my posting, I never once tried to justify the $4mln+ final cost of this building by pointing to any irrelvant information or hyperbole. I merely stated reasonable assumptions about cost of renovation that would be involved plus the likely final cost per square foot of around $1000.

Notice, that I said that $1000/sf is reasonable for the neighborhood. Why did I say that? Was that just my opinion? No, I did not offer an opinion. I offered an observation. There is a big difference between the two. The observation is based on what several renovated townhouses have sold for over the past year in Brooklyn Heights.

Again, my conclusion is that based on what the market has been valuing renovated townhouses in Brooklyn, the house at 39 Willow Place is properly priced in the $2.5mln-$3.0mln range considering the likely costs of doing a reasonably high-end renovation.

Now, I will make one last statement: I will not respond to any more gratuitous attacks.

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 2:01 PM

JohnR, no sense responding to scarab.

You can't reason with drunks or fools.

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 2:10 PM

this thread is getting so depressing... This is a well priced house for the market in the neighborhood. Whether you are agree with that mrket is another matter. I love (and live in) the heights and find such prices to be bordering on reasonable, altho I can't afford them myself. It is a nice life there. why is everyone so bitter? By the way, I used to live in the W. Village and I actually prefer the heights.

By the scarab on April 20, 2007 2:19 PM


JohnR,

I certainly can't deny what houses are selling for today.

But as I'm sure you know, the real estate market moves in cycles. New York's is at the peak and I believe prices have a long way to fall in the upcoming correction.

Folks like ANON 12:43 provide exactly the type of rational that naive boosters always toot immediately before a correction. "A million new residents" --- whatever!

I've been a real estate investor for years and I strongly believe real estate will soon fall out of favor as the "investment dejour" and major price corrections will ensue.

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 2:21 PM


I prefer Allentown!

What's your point?

By bobbynesbitt on April 20, 2007 3:02 PM

I guess the brokers doing the Open House at 44 Strong Place (Vespa Properties?) will see a lot of those jilted bidders from Willow this Sunday. Does anyone know anythng about that property?

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 5:38 PM

Your logic definitely applies to places where people were buying 2nd and 3rd summer houses as "investments du jour", 2:19. But here in NYC we all can only afford one property inside NYC, that's the one we live in! People might drop their weekend houses on LI, sure.

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 11:31 PM

Anxiety and aggression. Yup, psychoanalyst in Manhattan, you seem to have that right.

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 11:32 PM

I'd like to schedule an appointment!

By Anonymous on April 21, 2007 12:15 PM


To all those worrying about my bucolic self. That was a price mark I was comparing apples to oranges.Yes, I live here, make my livlihood in real estate for the last thirty five years. I was stating
what twenty or thirty of my fellow professionals stated over coffee. Is the market fueled by people who are not New Yorkers, you betcha, are prices too high, you betcha. So you paid three million for a house in Cobble Hill; you don't think yu paid too much. Did a broker state you were getting a great deal. I will tell you that if Willow sells for under three mill and you paid close to three mill in a less desirable location.
Someone didn't calculate properly. Last year, there was an open house near my office in Cobble Hill. A young man came in and asked me if a wooden house a block from the housing project was worth
1.5M. I told him price is dependent on many things besides value. How much do you really like the block and the house. I am sorry most of you have overpaid, in a three tier market someone
must pay more. I know it only takes one buyer to sell a house. We all remember what Barnum said. I bought my coop in 1979, I paid a fair price for my apartment. Others in the building had paid more. I have one of the more desirable locations in the city and have views of the park. I wouldn't live in a
dark brownstone with wicdows on two sides. Not for the kind of money you are
paying. You have no windows, the only floor that gets any light is the parlor floor. You paid what? You have no windows. You have no views. Oh that's right, if yu go to your roof you can see
New York City. Now there will be those, who will have something argumentative to say, guaranteed you paid too much, and you are planning on doubling your money in three years or less. Do you have a fabulous space, would you know one if you so one. I have been selling BROWNSTONES FOR A LONG TIME, THERE HAVE BEEN THREE OUT OF SEVERAL THOUSAND THAT STAY IN MY MIND; THE REST. NOT SO GOOD.

AN HONEST REALTOR


The Old Realtor

By Anonymous on April 21, 2007 1:27 PM

Old Realtor,

That was the some of the most inane, incoherent drivel I've ever had the displeasure of reading.

It reads like it was written by someone who's functionally retarded. Besides being riddled with spelling and grammatical errors, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Seriously, you would do well to take a remedial English class at your local elementary school.

No one gives a shit what you think (who would listen to an uneducated moron like you?), and no one is worrying about your "bucolic self".

By the scarab on April 21, 2007 1:50 PM


Actually, amongst all his "incoherent drivel," I see the glow of truth within the the Old Realtor's rant.

He may not possess the diction of Shelley, the prose of Dickenson, or the imagination of Balzac, but Old Realtor knows the Brooklyn market and he knows it well.

The market for townhouses is insanely high. When it crashes I sincerely hope Old Realtor is still around to offer his wisdom and share his experiences.

Thanks for your service, sir. You sound like a good man with a lot left in you!

By Anonymous on April 21, 2007 2:07 PM

Scarab, just how do you figure Old Realtor "knows the Brooklyn market" well? Nothing in his twaddle indicates any real estate expertise. That is, other than the fact that he calls himself a broker.

Wait--just remembered you're the idiot who's predicting a 50% drop in real estate prices.

Regarding your last post at 1:50, I'll just chalk it up as a case of moron defending moron.


By the scarab on April 21, 2007 3:07 PM

2:07pm,

Despite calling me a "moron" for not sharing your opinion of the near term future of the NYC real estate market, I'll answer your question.

Old Realtor states "I wouldn't live in a
dark brownstone with windows only on two sides."

This is an excellent point which is rarely mentioned on this website. Most classic brownstones, specifically deep ones, have major natural light deficiencies because their are no windows on their sides to let in light.

He's making an excellent point that multi-million dollar price tags for dark homes is odd. I happen to agree. Sometimes it takes a while for a market with little fluidity, like the Brooklyn townhouse market, to adjust properly.

Anon 2:07pm, when prices fall precipitously, which they're bound to, I expect you to call me a genious and apologize for your uncalled for name calling.

By Anonymous on April 21, 2007 4:55 PM

Do you really think that Old Realtor's observation that brownstones don't have side windows means that he "knows the Brooklyn market and knows it well"?

What are you, stupid?

That makes him Captain Obvious. That doesn't make him an expert on Brooklyn brownstones or real estate.

Prices are bound to "fall precipitously"? Again, you portend a massive price drop! Tell me, are prices going to drop 50% simply because, "the real estate market moves in cycles" (post 2:19, April 20)? Or are you going to say that since you could've purchased a property much cheaper a few years ago, prices are bound to fall 50% (post 11:12, April 20)?

Seriously, you are a mental midget.

P.S. You misspelled "genious", genius.

By Anonymous on April 21, 2007 8:15 PM

Wow, everyone seems to be frothing at the checkbook. Sorry, many of you have paid too much for your digs. Many of you were
caught up in the frenzy.Yes, your house is
a very important investment, but more importantly it is the place you live. Be happy, stop worrying about sticker shock.


To the young man who was worried about my spelling mistakes, don't be. Worry about the price you paid for your cozy
digs. Yes, realtors get together and laugh at market prices. In 1955, houses in Carroll Gardens were selling for five grand. No one wanted to live there except poor blue collar workets. In 1976
you could buy a limastone in Park Slope for twenty grand.


Have a wonderful life, stop worrying about real estate.
If you think you paid too much, you probably did. So what, you are living in your investment.

The Realtor

By Anonymous on April 21, 2007 8:20 PM

Wow, everyone seems to be frothing at the checkbook. Sorry, many of you have paid too much for your digs. Many of you were
caught up in the frenzy.Yes, your house is
a very important investment, but more importantly it is the place you live. Be happy, stop worrying about sticker shock.


Yes, realtors get together and laugh at market prices. In 1955, houses in Carroll Gardens were selling for five grand. No one wanted to live there except poor blue collar workets. In 1976
you could buy a limastone in Park Slope for twenty grand. Please stop comparing
Brooklyn to Manhattan, only a non=native
could, would be guilty of such a somparison.


Have a wonderful life, stop worrying about real estate.
If you think you paid too much, you probably did. So what, you are living in your investment.

The Realtor

By Anonymous on April 21, 2007 10:15 PM

We left the village in 1970, and bought in Park Slope. Two salaried civil servants,we could not afford the Slope today. Salaries haven't kept up with real estate prices. I believe the market was fueled by itself. Selling high, buying bigger with the profits, is a theme running through all neighborhoods. I Don't
see the value today. I really don't. I am glad brokers are telling me that I can receive over two mill for my house.
I still think it's all crazy. We will eventually reverse move, and move back to the city into a smaller space.

By Anonymous on April 22, 2007 8:27 AM

Who started this rumor that the houses on Willow Place and Columbia Place have structural damage from the BQE traffic?

The only reason that the house at 42 Willow Place had been braced is that it was, for many years (until 1964), bordered on both sides by empty lots. It was in 1964 that construction started on the cinderblock buildings that now border it.

The subway does run under Joralemon Street causing some trembling in the houses along Joralemon Street and the first few houses on Willow Place and Columbia Place NEAR Joralemon St.

Both 39 and 42 Willow Place are far enough away from Joralemon not to feel any vibration - almost 2 full city blocks away.

And, for those of you who think you know it all, there is a difference between Willow PLACE and Willow STREET. If you don't know the difference, you shouldn't even be posting here.

By Anonymous on April 22, 2007 1:18 PM

According to the NYT, manhattan THs have
lost eight percent of their value in the
last year. Is Brooklyn following the
curve, or making its own curve. Is it a
great deal, or are you paying too much.
I can understand if you bought in the last three years you could be sweating.
Do you need to make money on your home,
what if it only worth ten percent more than you paid for it. Is that the worst thing that could happen. Do you feel richer in a bull market than a bear
market. I know a psychotherapistwho only gets 500 per hour the first visit.
He lives in Park Slpe, paid seventy five
dollars a sq. ft. years and years ago.
It's so easy to rattle your tree.

By Anonymous on April 22, 2007 2:19 PM

Anonymous at 1:18, that was a truly idiot, nonsensical post. Were you drunk or high when you wrote that? Or are you just a moron?

Are you related to old realtor by any chance?

Please point out the article regarding the drop in Manhattan townhouse values, because I don't think it exists.

According to every source I could find, the median prices of Manhattan townhouses were HIGHER than the year before:

http://www.therealdeal.net/issues/NOVEMBER_2006/1162318656.php

I'd post the link to the Bloomberg article where it stated that Manhattan townhouse prices rose 63% (from mid-2005 to mid-2006), but I don't think I need to point out any further what an imbecile you are.

By Anonymous on April 22, 2007 11:17 PM


Anon 2:19,

I won't call you any names because I stopped doing that when I grew up. Didn't your mother ever teach you manners? You might want to visit a professional to work out those anger issues. It's not normal to call people insultful names for disagreeing with you. It makes you sound like a spoiled lonely child.

Or are you just angry because you paid a lot recently for a property, as Old Realtor suggests, and you don't like hearing bad news?

Or are you a real estate agent pissed off because business is slow?

What's your beef?

By Poster 11:17 is a jackass on April 23, 2007 11:33 AM

Anon 11:17,

1. I'm merely calling a spade a spade--or in this case, a moron a moron.

Funny how you chastise me for calling people names then proceed to suggest that my parents were somehow negligent, that I'm not "self-actualized" and have "issues", and that I'm a "spoiled lonely child".

Wow. Didn't YOUR mommy teach you to the meaning of hypocrisy?

2. I've owned my home for years. I'm not tremendously concerned with good OR bad news concerning price fluctuations since I have no intention of selling. It's just very irritating when morons spread falsehoods (ie, that Manhattan TH prices have fallen when every news source reports a rise).

3. Am I a real estate broker? God no. Besides the fact that I have more than a middle school education (which makes me overqualified to be a broker), I think they're utterly useless bottom-feeding scum with zero ethics.

Of course, the 99% of brokers who are moronic simpletons (like old realtor) ruin it for the other 1%.

My beef? I'm annoyed by morons. You included. So fuck off. Or was that too harsh for your delicate sensibilities?

By guest on November 8, 2007 8:12 PM

This house sold in July 2007 for $3.5M

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Related Posts with Thumbnails