« Monday Links Tonight: Extending the FG/CH Historic Districts »

April 16, 2007

Rainy Day Rally to Step Demo for Yards Parking

aycrowd07a.jpg
Despite the torrential rains, more than 200 people turned out for yesterday's Brooklyn Speaks-sponsored "Rally Against Demolition for Parking" at the Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church in Fort Greene. The narrow objective of the rally was to save the 20 or so buildings (including Ward's Bakery) slated to be torn down over the next month to create parking and staging space for the construction of the first phase of the Yards project. “In the age of sustainability and global warming and added people to New York, it’s an obscenity to knock down buildings to build surface parking,” said Jon Orcutt, executive director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign advocacy group. To the chagrin of the many DDDB members in the audience, the more centrist approach of the organizing coalition, which seeks to reduce the scope of the project through peaceful engagement of FCR and government officials, dominated the oratory, as not a single speaker, including council members Yassky, BeBlasio, Jeffries and James, mentioned the words "eminent domain" and only one, Tish James (who, AY Report notes, drew the loudest applause), mentioned the pending lawsuits. DDDB is planning a protest at the corner of Flatbush and Pacific on Wednesday morning to coincide with the planned demolition of four buildings on that corner. More pics on the jump.
Rain Doesn't Dampen Rally [Metro]
More Than 200 Rally Against Demolition for Parking [AY Report]
Over 200 brave storm to Rally [Brooklyn Speaks]

aycrowd07b.jpg
deblassio0407.jpg hakeemjeffries0407.jpg tishjames0407.jpg yassky0407.jpg

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/953

Comments

lost cause

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 9:15 AM

Fighting for your home and your neighborhood is NEVER a lost cause.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 9:32 AM

Think of the chaos that would be caused by a LACK of parking. People would be circling through neighborhoods like Park Slope, Prospect Heights, Boerum Hill, Fort Greene and Clinton Hill looking for street parking and causing even more pollution.

Visitors would take spots on the street and fill up local garages. An increase in demand would raise the price of garage parking for everyone. This would make life for residents owning cars much more difficult.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 9:34 AM

They should give up the folly of Venice on the Gowanus, level the whole damn area and use it for parking for Ratner and his family

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 9:46 AM

That's almost funny. At least the intention of humor is there.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 9:48 AM

If Ratner did not provide parking the opposition group would be protesting the lack of parking. If FCR proclaimed the sky is blue the opposition would protest against FCR assertion that the sky is blue. Anything FCR does will always face protest from the opposition.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 9:52 AM

anon 9:48, it's not supposed to funny

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 10:15 AM

If it is hard to find parking, those who can take transit will do that, and there will be less traffic on our streets. Plus more parking means fewer interesting buildings or parks. Who likes to walk by a parking lot?? If you want parking, go to the burbs!

Posted by: JDM at April 16, 2007 10:31 AM

9:52: your wrong, their are no project opponents or critics who are in favor of demolishing whole city blocks to create longterm (temporary) surface parking. and if Ratner didn't do that, they would applaud it rather than oppose it as you so humourously suggest.

by the way, project supporters would evict their own mother if it meant getting the project done.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 10:37 AM

its hard to believe in this day an age - with pollution and oil prices such a concern that the City is helping to fund what is essentially a throwback to the early sixties.

The purpose of the lots is not only to provide parking for construction workers (i thought it was providing local jobs by the way, so why the necessity to drive to a major transportation hub) but for Nets fans.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 10:49 AM

Those who claim that the provision of parking here is a good thing, please remember that this parking is intended to be INTERIM. What does this mean? That these many acres will be parking only until Phase 2 -- which is supposed to consist of 10 (12?) high rise apartment towers.

So these parking lots do not consist of a long-term transit plan for the arena. And even if these parking lots were the long-term transit plan for the arena, it would be a lousy plan. Parking lots encourage people to drive. So a whole lot of people are going to get very accustomed to driving -- because there will be parking available -- thus causing horrendous traffic jams radiating outward for many blocks from the arena. This will be quite lovely for the residents of Fort Green, Park Slope, and Prospect Heights. (To those who say that bad traffic will encourage people to take all of that mass transit that supposedly makes this a "transit-oriented" development, we all know that traffic jams have never stopped anyone from driving.)

Of course, if this project involved real planning around the traffic issues, we'd be seeing something very different. We would be seeing planning that would create strong disincentives to drive. Most important would be creating the conditions under which it would be extremely difficult to park your car -- no on-site parking, zoning to prevent the development of parking garages, and residential parking stickers for the immediate vicinity to the arena. Additional measures such as congestion pricing for traffic going into Manhattan below 59th St. would further alleviate the congestion at Flatbush/Atlantic/4th Ave.

But none of these things are being done. Instead, a vast swathe of Prospect Heights is being torn down and turned into a giant parking lot. The build-out on Phase 2 could be as long as 15-20 years, depending on economic conditions (remember, FCRC isn't under any obligation to build anything at all if it's not profitable). Thus, we can look forward to this part of Prospect Heights being a parking lot for a long time to come. Talk about blight!

Posted by: SPer at April 16, 2007 11:37 AM

Of course traffic jams discourage people from driving! If there were no traffic jams, I would drive to work in Manhattan!

Posted by: anon at April 16, 2007 12:41 PM

Love all the protests re: everything having to do with the Atlantic Yards but barely a peep about reopening AND expansion of the House of D. Yuppies are weird.

Posted by: Spankey at April 16, 2007 1:06 PM

Shouldn't the headline be "STOP Demo" rahter than "STEP Demo"?

Posted by: anonymous at April 16, 2007 1:53 PM

"Of course traffic jams discourage people from driving! If there were no traffic jams, I would drive to work in Manhattan!"

Really? If traffic jams stopped people from driving to Manhattan, why are there traffic jams in the first place? My guess is that if you had the free parking enjoyed by most of the NYC residents who are commuting by car to Manhattan, you might drive too.

The research: (www.transalt.org)

"Ninety percent of auto commuters live and work in areas where most commuters use some other mode to get to work (i.e., rail, bus, walk, taxi).
Only 10% of CBD auto commuters commute between home and work areas in which auto is the typical way to make the trip. The choice of auto is motivated by the comfort and convenience of driving, speed of travel, availability of free parking or a combination of these and other factors. Very few people who drive in the Manhattan CBD lack an alternative mode.

AND:

A survey of over 1,600 motorists in the
Manhattan CBD shows that fewer than one-half of those parking in the CBD personally pay for parking. The majority of CBD parkers have employer-provided parking, are reimbursed by their employer or park at unmetered curbside spaces.

Posted by: SPer at April 16, 2007 2:26 PM

SPer - I completely agree with you, that most car trips to Manhattan could be avoided (i.e. people could take transit, bike, etc.). My point was just that people will drive until it's too inconvenient (too expensive, too slow, etc.). If we made it somehow more convenient for people to drive (by widening roads, providing more free parking), more people would drive. If we made it harder for people to drive (by tolling the East River bridges, by NOT building lots of new parking at AY), more people would take transit.

Posted by: anon at April 16, 2007 3:25 PM

why fight the inevitable

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 3:48 PM

Oh yeah, we are going to remain an enclave with parking, no lines, status quo, etc. D-O-N-E-D-E-A-L good morning!

Posted by: anon at April 16, 2007 4:24 PM

Anon at 3:35 -- sorry sounds like I misunderstood you. My main point is simply that congestion does not stop people from driving. And I actually understand that. I have a car and would drive to Manhattan a lot more often, traffic notwithstanding, were it not for the difficulty parking.

Posted by: SPer` at April 16, 2007 4:30 PM

As always, most of the attendees are white.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 5:42 PM

So boring. No cares about AY....

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 6:57 PM

This is what grasping at straws looks and feels like.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2007 8:01 PM

Here's a laughable response from Bruce Bender of Forest City Ratner
“While opponents will say they[construction workers] should be using mass-transit to commute to and from the location, as many of them do, it is a tad difficult when your job requires that you arrive with tools and other gear.”

1000+ contractors are not bringing their own tools to work with them every day. They leave things locked up in sheds on site and hire night security. But the contractors who are bringing materials and tools on to the site should have some place to store them. So maybe after Ratner tears down all the buildings he could build them a staging area. Or maybe he could just keep the Ward bakery building.

Posted by: Eliot at April 16, 2007 9:02 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions