« Development Watch: Dikeman Doubleshot Friday On The Record »

December 8, 2006

Open House Picks: Townhouses

houseClinton Hill
48 Clifton Place
Brown Harris Stevens
Sunday 12-2
$1,485,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseClinton Hill
239 St. James Place
Brooklyn Properties
Sunday 2:30-4
$1,350,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseSouth Slope
212 16th Street
Douglas Elliman
Sunday 12-2
$1,100,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseBedford Stuyvesant
282A Gates Avenue
Corcoran
Sunday 12-2
$799,000
GMAP P*Shark




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/113

Comments

I would say the Clifton one is quite overpriced ... what gives?

Union looks good, probably 80k over what it will go for.

Posted by: Chazz at December 8, 2006 12:26 PM

Any ideas about what's next to the 16th Street property, on the right side as you look at the photo? It looks...odd.

Posted by: zeebee at December 8, 2006 12:35 PM

Re: Gates Avenue, what is "Eastlake style"?

Posted by: anonymous at December 8, 2006 1:12 PM

1:12...eastlake was an architect during the late 1800s and early 1900s and certain type of detail express that style on victorian-era homes.

Posted by: anon at December 8, 2006 1:41 PM

Here's a link from a San Francisco broker's site on Eastlake (and other styles):
http://www.ianberke.com/architecture-style1.html


And here's the Landmarks guide to NYC rowhouse styles:

http://home2.nyc.gov/html/lpc/downloads/pdf/pubs/rowhouse.pdf

Posted by: zeebee at December 8, 2006 1:42 PM

Clifton is a piece of crap. What is going up next door? I think $ 1.2 mil. has it.. Cheap reno..

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 2:12 PM

I'd be interested in seeing where all of these sell. They seem to be priced right from what I can see. The Gates Avenue one is very skinny (16 foot) and there are no real pictures, except for the nice woodwork, so that is a mystery. Clifton is wide enough but shallow (35 feet); the rental kitchen looks a little groady -- too bad there aren't more pictures.

Posted by: anon at December 8, 2006 2:27 PM

Clifton Pl. isn't very nice. Next door is a vacant lot owned by a developer in the Slope.

Posted by: west at December 8, 2006 4:05 PM

Clifton Place is a nice block, awesome area. I kind of like the stainless steel kitchen. The other kitchen is depressing as hell, and I hate all those bars on the windows but I guess that's standard.

St. James is horrid.

South slope is a boring location.

Bed stuy -- MORE PICS PLEASE!

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 4:21 PM

We saw the Clifton place last weekend. It's a weird property. There's an extension on the first two floors (including the kitchen in the photo), but there are no windows on the rear portion. There are windows on the east side, but that's the side that will get blocked once a building goes up in the neighboring lot. There's no access to the back yard through the building -- you have to walk around the building through the vacant lot, which is problematic and bizarre. There is a nice deck for the top floor unit, but you have to climb through a window to get onto it. It does have some good potential but needs work.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 4:34 PM

Sorry, meant to say extention on the first *three* floors.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 4:36 PM

i like the butcher block counter tops at st. james, but that's about it.

Posted by: anon at December 8, 2006 4:44 PM

I know how many on this blog talk as though Brooklyn Brownstones are so different/unique in the way prices have escalated.
Well here is a south Bronx open house and to me seems just seems quite comparable (if not higher) if you account for size, condition and 'less than upscale' neighborhood.

http://www.corcoran.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&ListingID=923318


Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 4:57 PM

Yes, but do people want to live in the south bronx?

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 4:59 PM

No.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 5:04 PM

Anon 4:59 - I am sure you did not intend your statement as a joke, but your post got me laughing out loud.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 5:08 PM

The 16th Street house is on a block with several huge construction projects; it's across the street from the one that was featured earier today (shoddy construction/mezzanines, angry neighbors) and right next to another big building (that's what's protruding on the right side of the picture). The block is a mess.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 5:11 PM

That place is not in Mott Haven, The Bronx. It's in SoBro. Get it straight.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 5:12 PM

Still Clifton Place looks like a bargain to me at its current price. Look at all the brownstones priced much closer to $2,000,000 in Fort Greene. Are they really worth that much more?

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 6:58 PM

I just checked in Property Shark and another house sold on Clifton for more and seems much smaller. So the comps are good for it.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 7:00 PM

sobro is a joke.

Posted by: armchair_warrior at December 8, 2006 7:28 PM

The house that sold for more on Clifton was a well-renovated 3 family with as much detail as possible salvaged, brand new facade, and needing no work. It was also not next to a problematic vacant lot, nor was it located at the intersection of Clifton and Grand, which still has problems with the drug traffic on the Grand corridor.

Posted by: Anon at December 8, 2006 9:09 PM

BTW, Corcoran had the Clifton Place listing until very recently...it hung out on their website with some strange patched-together photos for many months. Can't remember what the asking was from Corcoran. If I remember correctly, the seller originally purchased bought both the house and the lot (the owner before the current seller owned both), and then sold the lot to the developer, which is part of what is making the house itself such a hard sell now. The house/lot package would be a lot more attractive.

Posted by: Anon at December 8, 2006 9:37 PM

I love the text for the agent pumping up the Clifton house. Come to this great area NOT... The only people who go there are folks who can't afford anything in the South Slope and Fort Greene. This is the area that first gets pounded when the market tanks.. The new broker took it for the same price that Corcoran could not sell it for. It is a dump. I agree it is way overpriced

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 9:52 PM

16th st prop appears interesting...has anyone seen the inside? if the block is truly under construction, would that mean when complete this house's value will elevate? there aren't many deals to be had in the slope, so I'd be happy to rough it out should I be getting a bargain.

Posted by: 50sense at December 8, 2006 10:05 PM

10:05 -- 16th Street is a pretty unpleasant place to be for small houses right now. Most of the block is being redeveloped into multi-family housing -- some of which looks a lot better than some of the other shlock going up in the borough. The neigghborhood is great in terms of amenities, but, personally, it it's a house I'm after, I would look on other blocks.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 8, 2006 10:28 PM

That's 16th bet 5 & 6th, which isn't a bad block.. so it has a few apt buildings, that's not that big of a deal. 7th ave in the south slope over there is pretty nice these days.

Posted by: OE at December 8, 2006 10:36 PM

Anon at 9:52 pm - I am curious, where do you live?

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 12:16 AM

The Clifton Place house is right across the street from a bodega that is leaving soon (spring). That building is being restored and will present a completely different vibe across the street. Choice market is a block away and the whole immediate area is turning around in ways that no one would have believed possible a short time ago. That said, the vacant lot next door is a big question mark.

Posted by: anonymous at December 9, 2006 10:14 AM

16th Street block is not "bad" but there is a LOT of construction right now -- I wouldn't want to move there till most of that is over. It's also a very ugly block with a crazy mishmash of big ugly new buildings and little frame houses with hideous siding.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 11:17 AM

All of you folks that are sleeping on the outer areas of Clinton Hill are truly sleeping. The next neighborhood is Bed-stuy for sure. Clifton Pl is a winner and that neighborhood is not going to be the same in five years. Look at Ft Greene. When I went to brooklyn tech back in the day, you never found yourself in that park. You went west from school. You went to subway and got the hell out of there. Now look at the number 2.4m and climbing if you have any view of that park
Grow up, your stuck

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 12:28 PM

Now I think $2.5m would be a steal for a done house parkside in Fort Greene! Are there any on the market in that price range in all of Fort Greene that are truly done I wonder?

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 3:33 PM

Yes, the bodega is being restored. But the drug traffic at the intersection isn't limited to the bodega (it's also linked to several other buildings nearby, and the intersection is its market in warm weather; at the moment, it's mostly moved indoors for the winter). So though the activity is certainly diminishing, it will take more than the change in the bodega property to clean up the immediate area completely. When Corcoran sold the corner property we're discussing to its current owner, the agent predicted merrily that the drug traffic at that intersection would be gone in less than a year, courtesy of Corcoran. Check Property Shark: how long ago was that? Hasn't happened yet, though it will eventually. So the question for a potential buyer is: how long, and does that fit with their plans? If a potential buyer is looking for a house to live in immediately, and has small kids or an intolerance for noise and drug traffic, they might want to make other plans.

Posted by: Anon at December 9, 2006 3:39 PM

Who is that Corcoran agent that had that listing before? I'd love a psychic broker of my very own.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 4:21 PM

I know this corner very well. This street has a really great vibe (great little shops -- bodega is supposed to become a bagel shop soon) and whatever drug dealing people are talking about is very minor (and can be found on most blocks in Brooklyn -- weed) and is part of any urban living reality.

I also know the developer (who bought the lot when the current owner bought the hosue separately). He told me that he won't be building for a while and that the current owner has the rights to a private garge when he does acutally build. Only the front two windows of the lvingroom part would go away. The exising owner also has access to the entire empty lot for use . . . giant yard for kids to play in and grow a garden.

It is the biggest house on the street (due to the addition in the back. The kitchen looks like something right out of Dwell magazine . . . I guess everything is a matter of taste . . . but it looks amazing to me.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 4:52 PM

Oh, please. Anyone who thinks that most blocks in Brooklyn have the entrenched drug issues of Clifton between Grand and St. James either doesn't live in Brooklyn or at the very least doesn't know their way around Clinton Hill. Minor it's not, nor is it "part of any urban living reality." Would Anon 4:52 by any chance be either the owner or the broker representing the property?

Posted by: Anon at December 9, 2006 6:16 PM

I own a building on that block, and some of my tenants are part of that drug trade. If you have any suggestions for getting rid of them and their illicit business, please let me know.

Posted by: Anonymouse at December 9, 2006 6:30 PM

The most innovative solution I've heard for getting rid of problem tenants was volunteered by an upstate plumber who owns a number of small apartment buildings. Whenever he buys a building, he rigs up a multi-valve contraption in the basement that can shut off the wasteline from each toilet separately. So whenever a tenant quits paying rent, that tenant's bathroom suddenly develops nasty plumbing problems. The plumber claims it works like a charm every time; when the tenants call and yell that he has to fix the plumbing, he replies that he can't afford to until he gets the rent. None of the problem tenants have stuck around more than a couple of days. And when they're gone, he just opens the valve, airs and repaints the apartment, and hangs out the For Rent sign. Saves a lot of litigation and hassle. (This is not a recommendation.)

Posted by: Anon at December 9, 2006 7:30 PM

...speaking up frequently at your monthly police precinct's community council meetings, contacting Tish James' office, contacting the Clinton Hill Association and your block association and asking them to lobby Tish James' office for you, e-mailing the mayor via nyc.gov, and the police comissioner. Also I would hire a good landlord-tenant attorney, and possibly also a private investigator to do some surveillance if need be. If you focus on this problem you will solve it. I have lived on mulitiple blocks in Brooklyn that have drug trade. It's annoying but never been threatening to me, but it would totally bug me if I was their landlord. Eventually they screw up somehow and get hauled off to jail, or worse.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 7:33 PM

I've met the people (young family with a young boy -- there are lots of families on this street black and white) who are/were renting the lower duplex on Clifton Place.

They told me they were actually friends with all the drug dealers . . . I mean what kind of "problem" could it be?

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 7:57 PM

Maybe it's all those affluent kids at that expensive Pratt Institute who live in the neighborhood supporting the local trade.

Go down to Atlantic and Grand Ave . . . that's a real problem.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 8:04 PM

No problem at all, until you get threatened for contacting the police (the word gets out very quickly); or until you speak up at Precinct meetings for years and the 88th simply denies there's a problem on Clifton Place (no complaints make for better stats, remember?); or until you get caught in the crossfire; or until, god forbid, you want to sleep at 1AM while the SUVs are parked outside with stereos blasting on summer nights to advertise the drug trade - and the 88th calls this a "quality of life issue" and won't even send a car around, as they're so busy elsewhere and Clifton Place has been a fait accompli for over 30 years, in spite of all the community action undertaken. Forgive me for asking, but do you have NO problem with the notion of your kid being "actually friends with all the drug dealers"? If not, you just might be the buyer that house is waiting for. I hope I just failed to appreciate your sarcasm...

Posted by: Anon at December 9, 2006 8:35 PM

I guess it's much better to rant and rave on brownstoner than to try to do anything about a problem that obviously concerns you deeply. I know many people on this block and I've never heard them complain about this stuff. I do hear people on FG Park complaining about all sorts of goings on their block (noise, trash, drugs, holdups), but there was nothing but cheerleading Washington Park on this site about the houses on that stretch. Whatever. It's a big city. I find more strange people on this blog than in real life to be honest.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 9:40 PM

I suppose it depends who you talk to, and how much they are aware of their surroundings. There are multiple people above acknowledging that the problem exists, and there are many local residents who do care deeply, and have worked over many years to combat it. And yes, these efforts have contributed to the improvement so far, though many may be unaware of that history. But as with Grand and Putnam, it's like plowing water; exert pressure on one area, and it moves around the corner (to Cambridge), or across the street, and eventually comes back. In the end, increasing real estate values may finally resolve the problem. Maybe the Corcoran guy was right, just premature. We'll see. Meanwhile, if there's really a good bagel store going into the bodega space, halleluljah.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 9, 2006 10:26 PM

I am just sick of people who don't know the real story about things going on these blogs and acting as if they do. And probably these are people who have some sort of agenda anyway for better or worse. If you read the Park Slope Paper's crime blotter you will be shocked at how dangerous Park Slope really is...or is it? I've never heard of anybody I know getting mugged, or heard of drive by shootings in Fort Greene, Prospect Heights, Clinton Hill. I actually do know somebody who was mugged in midtown last week though. Okay, maybe muggings happen everywhere. But are people really scared of drive by shootings in Brooklyn? No. But on here it's ridiculous. And slanderous about entire neighborhoods.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 10, 2006 8:41 AM

I lived on Clifton Place for almost 30 years, and I can tell you this block has improved tremendously. That is because there were a group of caring individuals that lived on the block. There are a group of new owners now, and their agenda is different from the people before. The older group were trying to improve the block by trying to get rid of the unsavory characters that hung out in the street. Every avenue was tried including going to the 88th precinct through multiple captains, the Brooklyn district attorney and local do nothing politicians. Nothing was ever done and even though things improved but the hoodlum from our block remains. The newer people especially the so called president of the block association is only concern with having block parties and will not acknowledge any problems. Until the people in this block wake up, the problems on Clifton Place will not go away, that is until the families that are involved in the illegal drug trade move out. We all know who they are and which houses they are in!

Posted by: Anonymous at December 10, 2006 2:30 PM

Doesn't HBO's Entourage star Adrian Grenier live two blocks away from this corner?

I've heard the person who created and runs this website lives right there as well.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 10, 2006 5:25 PM

"We all know who they are and which houses they are in!"

You seem emotionally disturbed -- maybe you need professional help or something better to do with your time.

How could you continue to live on this street for 30 years and be so unhappy?

Maybe New Jersey would suit you better . . . or a rest home.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 10, 2006 5:28 PM

What planet are some of you guys from? Yes, Grand and Clifton Place is a bit menacing, but it's actually gotten substantially better over the years.

There is a bad vibe, but to hear some describe it you would think it's an open-air drug market with gun-toting troublemakers everywhere. It's not. I doubt any of the fearmongers posting here regularly even walk around the area.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 10, 2006 6:17 PM

It is obvious from the comments that drugs are a problem here (Clifton). The statements seem sincere. Reduce the price $200,000 and maybe there will be a taker. What re broker would take this listing at this price with major drug problems and a buildable lot next door? A fool..

Posted by: Anonymous at December 10, 2006 7:09 PM

Didn't Corcoran have this listing at the same price? What is the name of that agent that had it at Corcoran?

Posted by: Anonymous at December 10, 2006 7:56 PM

Jerry Minsky

Posted by: Anonymous at December 10, 2006 8:16 PM

Hello:

I am the owner of 48 Clifton Place. Wow. Who ever thought me selling my house would stir up so much passion. Made me realize that I miss all these never ending lunatic arguments that arise over . . . everything.

Unfortunately I now live in Los Angeles (my wife's job moved us out here 3 years ago). If I had the choice I would move back to Brooklyn (and that house) in a second. We hope someday to return and buy back into that same area.

We moved into that house when my daughter was 3 days old and lived there for 3 years. In all honesty it was the best time of my life. I'd never actually felt a part of a community before in my entire life. My former tenants (who just moved out and could afford to live anywhere) have a son the same age as my child and they loved living there and expressed the same joy about interacting with ALL the members of the community that we did.

The guys who sometime hang out further down the block on the corner have been in my home and I have been in theirs. I've hired some of their children to work in my garden. When I got in the taxi to go to the airport to move to LA there were teenagers who are part of the "problem" hugging me and my family goodbye. Maybe that means we are bad people . . . so be it.

I honestly think that all these negative Anonymous posters should move to New Jersey. If someone looking to buy my property thinks that Brooklyn is going to be some lily-white enclave or The Cosby Show they shouldn't be looking to buy in this area. It's ironic that the most expensive homes in the vicinity are next to one of the worst problems (Fort Green Park - Walt Whitman Housing projects) in Brooklyn and that there are all those wonderful shops and restaurants are in the so called "crossfire" of Clifton Place.

One mans castle . . .

Most of the information posted here is totally incorrect by the way and makes me laugh - like the conversation with the Corcoran realtor about ending the "problem" on the corner. Maybe in New Jersey the realtors have that kind of power.

If anyone out there really cares to find out the reality of this realty please contact my new realtor:

Lee Solomon - lsolomon@bhsusa.com

You can get the real story from her and see the place for yourself.

Thanks.

Owner, 48 Clifton

Posted by: Owner, 48 Clifton at December 10, 2006 10:35 PM

To the owner: this is a discussion board about brooklyn real estate, and your house is the subject of a thread regarding your listing. Unkind of you to characterize a civil discussion as a never ending lunatic argument. Drugs are of no little concern to someone paying 1.5MM for a house.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 11, 2006 6:27 AM

To the owner of the house. You are completely out of line. Maybe you should keep your big mouth shut and mind your business. Afterall, all you are after is money. Goo luck.

Posted by: anon at December 11, 2006 8:03 AM

Not sure why anon 8:03 thinks the owner is out of line. Seemed like a perfectly reasonable comment to us.

Posted by: Brownstoner at December 11, 2006 9:22 AM

To anon 5:28. You are the one who is emotionally disturbed if you think living with criminals is such a joy. You are probably one those that are hanging out there with the hoodlums and a nerve is hit!

Posted by: Anonymous at December 11, 2006 9:55 AM

Drug traffic in eastern Clinton Hill is very block-to-block. Turf gets established, and then it's protected. Brownstoner lives close to Putnam and Grand, and has been instrumental in getting attention to the problems there - more power to him, though the ultimate outcome remains to be seen. With luck, the situation in both locations will continue to improve. But the reason the owner's comment is out of line is that for obvious reasons, he's trying to put a benign face on a situation that is not benign, and insisting that the problem does not exist. Honest comments from the landlord on Clifton Place who would like to get rid of tenants in the drug trade, and from others who have lived on this block far longer than the owner did are included above; these are people who are truly part of the "community," and welcome anyone who wants to help in efforts to improve the situation. Those active in combating the drug situation at Putnam and Grand may not be aware that there have been drug-related shootings on Clifton Place as well. Not for the last few years, but the players haven't disappeared. The honest comments are not from "another planet" -they're from people who know the block well. A desire for a "lily white enclave" or "the Cosby Show" has nothing to do with an entrenched drug problem on the block, and the implication that truthful commenters are racist or elitist is offensive. And characterizing the Corcoran comment as "incorrect" because "no realtors have that power" is not a response to the comment, as the point was the agent's puffery - not the agent's power. The owner says the negative commenters should move to New Jersey - but face facts, he's the one who moved out.

Posted by: Anon at December 11, 2006 10:34 AM

I lived on Clifton near that very corner. My honest opinion is as follows:
1. The only way to eliminate the drug trafficking is buy replacing some of the residents on or near that immediate location. There are families that have lived there for many generations that will not be going anywhere. I am sorry but the 88th is not going to improve the situation beyond ensuring that the number of shots fired or killings decrease. Outside of that ….all Hale to the Weed Smokers as smoking in public seems to be encouraged.
2. From purely a financial perspective I think the property value will significantly climb in the next 5-10 years as the number of people desiring the Clinton Hill area increases, public transportation remins very accessible, and its mere proximity to downtown. It’s far enough away from downtown yet close enough to walk, bus, or take a short train ride too.
3. From a family perspective I think it is a great location as it is sandwiched in-between Bed Stuy and Clinton Hill proper or Fort Greene. It would be a perfect situation for someone who desires a diverse neighborhood and does not want to be completely subjected to gentrification to feel like your neighborhood is safe place to live. At the moment, if you observe the corner of Grand and Clifton on any day for 3 hours you will definitely see upstanding citizens who represent a positive transformation of the neighborhood and those who are the definitely the cancer of the of teh movement.
Okay 1 may ask…Why did U move. The answer is simply:
1. I moved because I could not stomach the chaos that unfolded before my eyes every day. It felt like entering a war zone as soon as I came out of the Classon Ave. train station. If I decided to take the train to Clinton Ave. the walk home was okay until I hit the corner of Grand and Clifton.
2. Financially I determined that my monthly obligations did not match up to the quality of life my family and I were experiencing. As a new proud owner of a brownstone surviving an extensive renovation project I simply lost it. Every day I came home from work I witnessed the nonsense that transpired on these blocks and immediately thought to myself DAM….I spend endless hours at work to pay for this…ah Hell No…its not worth it.
3. My dream of seeing the neighborhood turn around in 2+ years was just that …A DREAM. After attempting to thwart the nonsense by personally talking to some of my neighbors i.e. the drug dealers, the users, and some of the youth.... I quickly came to the conclusion that this environment is not going to change in the very near future. After witnessing/participating in the Tish talks, frequently calling and visiting the 88th precinct, and personally coaching some of the offenders…the result for me was to simply get out of the neighborhood when the first opportunity presented itself. As a result, my initial long term investment which made my stomach turn each and everyday ended up in me taking advantage of the housing market and getting the hell out of dodge.
Bottom Line – If you can stomach the non-violent crimes i.e. drug use, the endless noise and traffic on that corner during the summer, the crack heads constantly asking for change, the occasional burglary once or twice a year (hope you are not the victum..as I had 2 very bad experiences)..I say lay down 1.1M - 1.3M on this property and hope for the best. If your objective is to make money I think you are safe. If you have a family note that your offspring can go 1 of two ways…they can grow up to become a upstanding citizen to society Or become a recipient of government programs like rehab, subsidized housing, public assistance, etc. Be advised that your kids will be influenced by those in there immediate surroundings because they will not be in the house 24/7. Everyone gets to know who you are as you will frequently be walking and patronizing some of the establishments in the neighborhood. The guy you will end up saying hello to everyday (believe me there is going to be someone out there everyday or night as you pass on your way to work, to your car, or the store) is going to ask u a million questions like…I am glad u moved in the neighborhood, where r u from, anything to make small talk before he asks you for change… may have a brother, sister, niece, or nephew who is going to sell/offer drugs to your kid …or your kids friends…or will rob someone who came to visit you sooner or later. Remember these people have occupied this area for generations….they are not going anywhere unless govt. subsidies are revoked. Race does not matter in this case. These folks slogan is …U leave me alone and I will leave U alone. We can co-exist just fine if you obey these simple rules. If u don’t expect hell to break loose. To me hell was already there everyday…… I didn’t obey the rules….and after too much I lost the battle by leaving because I refused to deal with it anymore. I could not stand living in that environment.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 11, 2006 3:25 PM

a couple of thoughts.

i own a house in the neighborhood and walk by clifton and grand almost daily. i never fear for my safety and while there may be illegal activity, it's not as menacing as some describe (IMHO). it's a concern though.

choice, grand 275, and dakar have all generated a lot of positive foot traffic in the neighborhood over the past few years. i think it's made things safer.

the house in question is an interesting property. it's narrow, but it has an extension which probably compensates for it's narrowness. it's missing some original detail and i think the fireplaces have been closed.

on another thought. i went and saw the open house over the weekend. i continue to be disappointed in the quality of real estate brokers in the area. for a 6% commission (or at least a share of what the agency takes), they should know more about the house. this time, the agent didn't know when it was built. ridiculous. this is an intimidating and significant investment and it appears that they only thing some agents know is how to open the door and let people in.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 11, 2006 4:14 PM

I remember speaking to you and your family at length about the house and to your parents about where they live in Richmond, VA. I thought you guys were so nice. I told you that often the city records don't have the exact dates the houses were built and that I could check on this and get back to you if I found out the exact date. I told you when houses of this era were built generally in the neighborhood though. You hadn't signed in to the open house sheet though because you said you weren't really interested in buying a place, you and your extended family just wanted to look around and you did for quite some time as I recall, you even wanted to see the tenant's apartments and it was only when you were upstairs checking out their apartment that you told me that you didn't really have any interest in buying a property you just liked keeping an eye on what's on the market and so I didn't realize that you really needed this additonal information. Next time if you have questions about a property I would of course be happy to help you further with any additional information. I know your father, or was it your father in law, from seemed very interested in history of homes in general and we talked for a bit about where they live. I don't think the lack of knowledge off-hand about the year a specific house was built illustrates lack of concern about somebody's significant investment though. I'm sorry that you feel otherwise. Often times the only way to find out the very exact date a house was built is to do a great deal of extensive research based on ancient city tax records and tax lot maps from centuries ago. At least that is my experience. The city records usually just dump out generic dates for some reason or other. I guess I could have just given you that simplistic answer, but I gave you the honest and complete answer about homes in this area.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 11, 2006 11:55 PM

There is something totally wrong with this thread (specifically this matter of Clifton Pl). First of all the multi-paragraph comments from the owner, the broker Lee Solomon outing her buyer and a few others is so out of the realm of what I think brownstoner was doing by fearturing it that my stomach was nauseated. Just comment about the property if you can and keep your baggage to yourself. There were other properties featured here as well and the immaturity that stems from this particular matter truly indicates the intelligence level(s) of those that I mentioned earlier. The seller wants to make top dollar in spite of his humbling speech of how this was the best times of his life. The broker is simply a nut. She has about as much talent as a used car salesman and about the same reputation. The buyer who felt the broker only opens the door for 6% isn't apparently even interested in the property.

You have my sympathies.

Posted by: anon at December 12, 2006 7:46 AM

Agree with above poster. Owner and agent are way out of line in posting here. The owner is trying to sell something for 1.5MM dollars. The agent is trying to make a 6 percent commission off of this. We're supposed to take what they say seriously? And as for the agent identifying a potential buyer on this board, well the agent should be fired for this unprofessional behavior. Unbelievable.

Posted by: Anonymous at December 12, 2006 7:55 AM

Owners and agents are welcome to post in this forum--if they identify themselves, as both did in this case. It's not for one opinionated reader to tell another that he/she isn't welcome. At least in this case they identified themselves. When someone is character assassinated, she should be able to defend herself.

Posted by: Brownstoner at December 12, 2006 9:13 AM

i used to live at 47 clifton for about 18 months. the neighborhood is fine, but not spectacular. rents are pretty reasonable, if not low.

this is a pretty nice property, in my humble opinion. the neighborhood is OK. this particular block is a nice one, in the historic district. this building is landmarked, which brings with it a host of responsibilities for potential owners, should they want to do any work to the building. even simple window replacement requires filing. even though this is not on a corner lot, because the corner lot is undeveloped, more of 48 is visible from the street, which may post landmarks challenges that normally wouldn't be a problem. also, i don't see a C of O for this building, which may or may not be a problem.

sort of sad the bodega is closing - the lucha libre in the spring is a fun party.

Posted by: janelle at December 12, 2006 10:40 AM

Keanu Reeves has been spotted shopping at the new Choice Market @ Grand and Lafayette . . . HBO star lives on that block.

Gee . . . what is really going on over there?

I wonder what this means for real estate values?

Posted by: Anonymous at December 13, 2006 12:23 PM

Brownstoner is right. People have the right to defend themselves. How utterly ridiculous to say otherwise.

signed,
not the seller, not the broker, not the buyer

Posted by: Anonymous at December 13, 2006 7:03 PM

The last post was the broker.

Posted by: anon at December 14, 2006 2:54 PM

I've just been staying at home waiting for something to happen, but I don't care. Basically nothing seems worth thinking about. I can't be bothered with anything recently.

Posted by: TramadoL4552 at January 4, 2007 11:10 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions