Open House Picks: Townhouses
Fort Greene
351 Adelphi Street
Brooklyn Properties
Sunday 1-3
$1,900,000
GMAP P*Shark Archive!
Fort Greene
222 Cumberland Street
Brown Harris Stevens
Sunday 2-4
$1,499,000
GMAP P*Shark
Carroll Gardens
10 Fourth Place
Halstead
Sunday 1-3
$1,200,000
GMAP P*Shark
Windsor Terrace
17 Howard Place
Warren Lewis
Sunday 2:30-4:30
$1,025,000
GMAP P*Shark
Crown Heights
1239 Dean Street
Corcoran
Sunday 12-1:30
$825,000
GMAP P*Shark
Check out Open House Picks: Apartments tomorrow morning!
52 Comments
By Anon on October 13, 2006 12:24 PM
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 12:30 PM
the bathroom in the adelphi house reminds me of a prison cell.
By j on October 13, 2006 12:30 PM
dean street at this location is in crown heights, not bed-stuy...
By Donna on October 13, 2006 12:44 PM
Adelphi was renovated, for the worse in my opinion. I think the seller would have be better off leaving it as it, reducing the price and selling it as a fixer-upper. How many people out there will be happy with black high gloss kitchen cabinets and that dungeon looking bathroom. What were they thinking. I would love to meet the person who buys this place.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 1:04 PM
4 months? Adelphi property should be featured on "Flip that House"
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 1:11 PM
These are all proto-typical of what's left on the market: building of suspect structural integrity (351), homes that have been completely neglected or run-dwon by their owners (10 4th), or in neighborhoods of suspect safety (1239). Windsor Terrace is the last great undiscovered neighborhood for anyone who lives remotely near the city.
10 4th Place is also underneath the BQE practically. Only 1.2 million? What a bargain!
I love the typical Carroll Gardens owner: can't even afford the real estate taxes in the neighborhood but resent the newcomers who are making them millionaires. Insane.
Can't wait till the bottom drops out. Soon.
By anon on October 13, 2006 1:14 PM
I've just started looking for a place in Windsor Terrace, and curious why 17 Howard is considered a best buy? I haven't seen the inside, but was able to walk by and it appears to need work. If putting a conservative 100k into this place, would it still be considered a good buy at 1,125,000? Does the nabe warrant those dollars at this point?
By anon on October 13, 2006 1:14 PM
I looked at the Fourth Place house a few weeks ago. There are no pictures of the garden and parlour floors because they are a disgusting mess. And there is no back garden - it was sold to plumbing business next door. This place needs a lot of reno, but its perfect for investment/rental. Hard to find property in a garden block for that price anymore.
By linusvanpelt on October 13, 2006 1:18 PM
1:14 -- I've never thought Brownstoner's Open House Picks were meant to be endorsements or "best buy" labels, just an interesting sample of the market.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 1:19 PM
My goodness, just noticed that 351 Adelphi was purchased back in June (of this year) for $1.4million. By the looks of things I doubt that the current seller has put that much money into the place to justify a 35% increase. Not to mention the "quality" of the finishes.
By linusvanpelt on October 13, 2006 1:19 PM
Btw, I bet Howard (and Fuller) are the priciest streets on a square-foot basis in Windsor Terrace.
By anon on October 13, 2006 1:23 PM
1:18, thank you for the correction on my 'best buy' comment. I assumed this was the case, glad that was cleared up before I got into trouble. Anyhow, would a home on howard go for that price in good condition?
By fern jackson on October 13, 2006 1:26 PM
I saw the Howard Street house about 1 1/2 months ago, at least. The house itself needs updating. And the basement is kinda unusable for anything else other than storage and laundry. It had a small backyard too. The thing that concerned us the most was the roof/ceilings. Looked like some leaks got the best of that house. Lovely row of house but they face a large blank structure.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 1:28 PM
No, Howard is not the priciest block in WT--Sherman and Fuller, probably are. Howard fronts Holy Name school and its schoolyard, and is also a main thoroughfare for Bishop Ford kids (who, like all children, generate a lot of noise and litter), is directly over the subway (which you can feel in the houses), and gets a lot of foot and car traffic because of the subway stop. Unlike Fuller, many of the houses are in deteriorated condition. Good luck to the seller in any case.
By Andrew from PS on October 13, 2006 1:31 PM
Saw 17 Howard two weeks ago. The house has a lot of original detail, is in good shape, has a charming bathroom with large skylight, a very small garden, and needs updating in general, particularly the kitchen. I think $100K would cover an update.
Also, there is a potential for a small terrace above the first floor kitchen.
The location is also excellent and the block has little traffic and is quite charming.
I would count this property in the top quartile of single families in W.T. and can only hope that the market correction continues (quickly) so that I can afford it.
By anon0505 on October 13, 2006 1:37 PM
Re Adelphi, a prison cell, LOL. Would love to see prison cells done in Water Works, now that would be an interesting use of tax payers money. BTW, I liked the half bath.
By brownstoner on October 13, 2006 1:44 PM
Good point about "best buys". While looking like a good buy is certainly one reason we'll include something, we'll also include houses that are architecturally significant regardless of price or houses that we think may be worthy of discussion or realte to something else we've discussed that week. It's all pretty subjective and seat-of-the-pants.
By Hal on October 13, 2006 2:01 PM
Re: 1239 Dean Street: This is the block that is the central focus of the proposed Crown Heights North Historic District, which is likely to be designated soon. Furthermore, as development creeps east along Atlantic from Flatbush, (like it or not) this section of Nostrand will benefit in the form of new amenities.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 2:14 PM
Market is crashing dont get fooled.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 2:18 PM
The market is crashing in a lot of places. But not here.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 2:42 PM
Any market, including the real estate market is affected by the sentiments of its participants. Where the market in NY crashes depends on where buyers beleive that it will crash. If buyers hold out - thinking that prices will drop, sellers will eventually have to drop prices in order to move properties. The real test of the market will come in the spring (after bonus time). If buyers with lots of free cash do not get caught up in the "i have lots of cash so let me spend it" mind-set then I think that sellers (who really need to sell) will eventually drop asking prices.
By Yente on October 13, 2006 2:54 PM
Adelphi: Although I'm not grooving to the modern cabinets, I actually like the "cell" bathroom and the rest of the kitchen. These finishes may not be your taste, but they are appealing to some folks and I can assure you, they aren't cheap. (No, I'm not the owner or broker)
The lighting, I'm not crazy about.
By west on October 13, 2006 2:56 PM
Am I crazy or was that Cumberland House featured a little while ago? It looks really narrow from the photos of the exterior.
That Adelphi house is just horrid looking. I think I saw an ad for an FSBO on Clermont for the same price that seems like a better value.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 3:01 PM
Based on the floorplan the Cumberland house looks to be 15-16 ft wide.
By spiffy on October 13, 2006 3:06 PM
10 Fourth place has a crazy old man and a crazy old dog living there. The garden floor has a dog-chewed-up couch at the corner, last time we saw it. The whole building was a mess and no backyard, no bathroom or kitchen on parlor floor. Who would buy such a piece of crap?
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 3:13 PM
All these are lipstick on a pig. Move along. Desperate owners playing housing market bingo - praying their number comes up and some fool will part with SEVEN figures for a place they abused. There should be legal ramifications for the sellers and brokers to represent these tore up homes.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 3:20 PM
waterworks or not, that bathroom is ugly and the kitchen is worse. much worse.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 3:33 PM
The Howard Place house needs some cosmetic work but it has a lot of beautiful wooodwork and details that would shine with the right owner in it. It might be a little bit overpriced but I dont they are that far off.
Not the best block in WT but certainly up there and very convienent to the subway, stores, etc.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 3:52 PM
If it is true that the Adelphi Street owner is a "flipper" who spend oodles of cash on crazy fixtures, then I do not understand the renovation strategy. Why use finishes that limit the pool of buyers that would be attracted to the property.
This renovation reminds me of the "flipper" house that was listed on Clermont Avenue last year. It also had a lot of "bling bling" finishes (including a high gloss, wood panelled room), was listed initially at $2million and eventually got reduced to $1.7.
If I were renovating a house to sell it, I think it would be better to go with classic/neutral finishes that are good quality but not crazy expensive. That way the pool of buyers is bigger, and in the case it sits on the market for a while I have greater flexibility to move on the price and still make a nice profit.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 3:58 PM
Clermont Avenue listing eventually sold for $1.625m.
By anonymous on October 13, 2006 4:07 PM
10 4th Plc is a great deal if you want to use your creativity to design your own duplex and still recieve rental income from the upper units. There is nothing else in the area in that price range. The BQE is at least a good block away.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 4:28 PM
1.5M for 2-window-wide on Cumberland? Do comps support this?
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 4:32 PM
The New York Observer. “The housing market has been nudging downward for a while now. Add one more factor: the overhaul, recommended this morning by the city housing department, of the so-called 421a tax break. Housing commissioner Shaun Donovan said in a conference call this morning that condo ‘prices would potentially go down to some degree’ in neighborhoods where the abatements would be eliminated.”
“In those neighborhoods, like Tribeca, the Financial District, Dumbo and Brooklyn Heights, prices have been inflated by about 50 percent of the value of those abatements, he said.” Just how much difference would that make? The abatements were worth $40,000 to $210,000 over their lifetimes, so prices would come down $20,000 to $105,000 just because of that one change. ‘It’s very clear that implementing these changes in a measured way over time is the right way to do this so that there is not a one-time significant impact,’ Donovan told reporters.”
“That said, Mayor Bloomberg said early this year that real estate prices were too high, so we don’t imagine he is too worried.”
The New York Sun. “Clearly the boom in the condominium market we were experiencing over the last few years and reached its peak about 12 months ago has cooled and the bloom is off the rose.”
“The vice president and regional manager at Fremont Investment & Loan, Patrick Crandall chimed in: ‘In terms of Manhattan, while its true inventories are climbing, it is really only in comparison to the frenzied absorption we have seen for the past several years. Buyers now know they have time to think and shop before making their purchase decision. I think buyers are taking longer to commit than they otherwise might, because they keep reading about an impending market decline in the papers and fear if they buy now their apartment will lose value.’”
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:06 PM
condo price may go down, but they will may be any cheaper to own, I would think that whatever a buyer saves on the mortgage will have to be spent to pay the taxes. Monthly out of pocket costs may be the same.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:06 PM
Someone said this:
"If buyers hold out - thinking that prices will drop, sellers will eventually have to drop prices in order to move properties. "
The problem is sellers ARE dropping prices on co-ops at least, even up to 20% already, and still people are thinking the prices will drop lower. Think again. If people don't sell within a reasonable amount of time that unit becomes a rental. Off the market. For at least a year or two. Most sellers do not have the luxury of letting a place sit empty for months and months while they pay maintenance on it, eventually selling at a loss. The mere idea is absurd.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:20 PM
"If people don't sell within a reasonable amount of time that unit becomes a rental. Off the market. For at least a year or two. Most sellers do not have the luxury of letting a place sit empty for months and months while they pay maintenance on it, eventually selling at a loss."
A few problems with this argument:
1. Most co-op boards have rules against renting the unit and changing it may impact the unit's eligibility for mortgage financing so I doubt we will see all the co-ops in the market hitting the rental market. Condo's maybe but not co-ops.
2. Rental rates will not stay high, if every seller put their place in the rental market then the increased supply will put downward pressure on rental rates, so seller may end up with negative cash flow.
3. Placing a place in the rental market assumes that the market rebounds in a year, think of all the people who held on to their tech stocks during the dot com "wobble" thinking they would recoup the lost value.
4. What about the sellers who need to sell (relocating) in order to buy a new place. I suppose they could rent, but there is still some risk.
By Will on October 13, 2006 5:24 PM
WT house - the price has dropped from 1085000 to 1025000 - I would think that this house will move just shy of 1 mil - why pay 25000 over a mil to have to pay mansion tax - just doesn't make sense - it does need some work - but great house for a mil in a great safe area - the basements of those houses have very high ceilings and you could fix the moisture thing and add 800+ sq feet - great house with lots of potential - the best part is it is just a short walk to south slope and park slope and who could forget the park a few streets away - and you get a great school too ps 154
as another poster stated a great undiscoverd area
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:30 PM
I agree with 5:06pm. Interesting this came up, because we are sellers with a Park Slope co-op on the market who did reduce the price but at some point would take it off the market to rent it out, before we reduce it further. The location is too good to have to do that. Some buyers may prefer to pick up a bargain in a new condo building in south-south-slope or in Gowanus, and that's great. It's understandable. It's just not going to happen on one of the best streets in Park Slope. There will be some discount, just not a total panic happening on those blocks.
Also the point about rental rates not staying high is absolutely untrue. The opposite happens when sales slow, in any and every city not just NYC. There are more renters thus more demand thus rent goes higher. Just ask any realtor.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:38 PM
Please explain the "more renters" argument. Where are these new renters comming from. We can all agree that most people have a place to live. We can also agree that in this market people will not sell (assuming that they can sell) and then rent. Are we to assume that "new entrants" to the market place will pick up all the extra supply in the rental market.
Brokers may list apartments at higher rents, but that does not mean that they will get it (the one exception may be very large apartments 3+ bedrooms, since they are rare in the rental market).
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:43 PM
Also, are sellers going to rent out their townhouses as well, especially recent buyers will high mortgage monthly payments on single family homes.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:50 PM
What cave have you been living in, 5:38pm? If there's anything making bigger headlines than the sales market in NYC, it's been all about how the rental market is exploding because in addition to other factors, the sales market is slowing.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:56 PM
"I continue to observe that the basics of real estate are back in play and that location and quality rule," the principal at Gladstein Development, Jane Gladstein, said. "Those projects that are extremely well located and superbly executed continue to sell. We must select our locations more carefully and plan our product more thoughtfully."
"While some ill conceived, poorly located, or overpriced condominium projects will likely suffer somewhat in the marketplace, well designed, well located, and smartly conceived projects should sell nicely, though, perhaps, not as rapidly as a year ago," said Robert Ivanhoe. "Fortunately, all of this should mean that the press and the pundits were wrong in their sensationalist predictions of a collapsing market.What a surprise."
(In other words, the best-located units or houses, new or old, in prime Park Slope are never going to be a bad investment. Location location.)
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 5:57 PM
Agree with 5:20.
Inventory has swelled and is still swelling well ahead of poplulation change. Most co-op rent-outs are short term and will not withstand a slowdown. A heated rental market already spells trouble because that's where the bubble sitters are. Simply transferring inventory from sales to rentals will stabilize rental amounts and further perpetuate the "renting is cheaper than buying" idealogy until buying is cheaper than renting (prices drop considerably).
Any spike in rental prices will be just that, a spike - short lived. It will only span the standoff. And even still, rents are not appreciating anywhere near what home "values" were since 9/11.
By Anonymous on October 13, 2006 6:01 PM
People don't have to make some huge profit on rentals for it to make more sense than letting a place that won't sell for a certain price, sit empty. Sellers only need enough to cover maintenance and mortgage. It's New York City, rentals are ALWAYS in demand. Get real.
By fortgreener on October 13, 2006 6:47 PM
I saw 351 Adelphi @ open house last weekend. This property went on the market w/ Brooklyn Properties about a month ago @ $2.25 million and dropped to $1.9 within two weeks. Strategy? Realtity check? I don't know. It is currently mid-renovation. Only parlor floor is done. Upper 2 floors still a construction zone, though upper floor bathrooms are close to done. Brokers say it will be delivered finished. All the bathrooms are very beautiful Waterworks tile & fixtures. The half bath off the kitchen/dining room in the picture is the least pretty of the bathrooms, but the only one finished, which I guess is why they photographed it -- the others are gleaming white and gorgeous. Apparently the "flipper" owner is a kitchen & bath designer. That said, I didn't care for the kitchen layout, but the finishes (white subway tile, honed slate (I think?) countertops, stainless appliances) were tasteful.
By anon on October 14, 2006 12:18 AM
thanks for the info on the adelphi house, fortgreener. i thought that perhaps the family from beetlejuice had moved back to the city.
By dt on October 14, 2006 7:28 PM
The problem (as I see it) with the Adephi house is that they decided to tile all the way up the walls in the bath and kitchen. I think this takes it from tasteful to industrial. If those tiles stopped four feet up the rooms would look much better, I think
By Anonymous on October 15, 2006 4:44 PM
Windsor Terrace Howard house would be great if you did not feel the subway every 10-15 minutes or so.
By Anonymous on October 15, 2006 5:38 PM
This is something that's easily changed so it's not a downside to any property as a purchase, but looking at the Windsor Terrace house I had to bring up a peeve of mine. I really don't understand all-concrete or all-brick backyards with no trees or shrubs or anything. Number one, it's ugly. #2, even if you hose it off there's always a nastiness to it that grass doesn't have. Lastly a big factor is sound bounces off bricks or cement like it's concert stadium right up into the windows of your house and surrounding houses. Neighbors can hear every word you say, when you're sitting out on an all-brick or concrete yard. Our neighbors downstairs can literally be whispering and we can still hear what they are saying.
By Anonymous on October 15, 2006 7:49 PM
Agreed...concrete backyards dont look as nice but there are a lot of people who just dont have the time to be good gardeners. A backyard of ugly concrete looks better than a backyard of weeds. I have a similiar situation and appreciate the ability to add potted plants and lawn furniture when I want or to have nothing when I dont feel like maintaining.
Especially for southern exposure backyards...weeds will grow like wildfire.
By anon on October 16, 2006 10:17 AM
I just wanted to address the poster who stated that 1239 Dean Street was in a "suspect" area. This happens to be a great block, with wonderful architecture as well as long time homeowners. Thank God that it will soon be protected by the LPC.
By chicken on October 16, 2006 1:58 PM
Anyone get into the 4th place house this weekend for a final review? I got swept up in housecleaning/eli manning and missed the open house...
Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Whoa. 400K increase at 351 Adelphi since last March. Was there a big rnovation or somthing?