« The Brooklyn Bourbon Festival Monday Links »

September 23, 2006

Open House Picks: Apartments

housePark Slope
125 Prospect Park West, #3B
2 BR Co-op
Corcoran
Sunday 12-2
$849,000 GMAP

houseWilliamsburg
26 Broadway, Multiple Units
2 BR Condo
Aptsandlofts.com
Sunday 1-4
$715,000 GMAP

houseCobble Hill
174 Pacific Street, #4E
1 BR Loft Co-op
Brown Harris Stevens
Sunday 2-4
$625,000 GMAP

houseClinton Hill
201 Clinton Avenue, #9C
2 BR Co-op
Corcoran
Sunday 2:30-4
$455,000 GMAP




Comments

FYI...price on 201 Clinton Ave is incorrect, link shows $455,000.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 9:43 AM

Is Park Slope KIDDING with the pricing of apartments? I'm seeing the houses go down, but coops are asking more ridiculous prices than ever. I can't imagine they're actually moving at these numbers.

Posted by: ParkSlopeRenter at September 23, 2006 10:25 AM

what a shame. i thought, finally, a somewhat affordable 2 bedroom in a part of brooklyn that isn't more than an hour commute to manhattan (the clinton ave one). then i followed the link and realized it's actually $455K.

when is this bubble going to actually BURST already, so us under-half-a-mil price range folks have a fighting chance?

i'm gonna stick with renting. i see no reason to move to a worse neighborhood to live in a smaller apartment and practically bankrupt myself in the process just for the joy of owning an APARTMENT.

Posted by: sylvia at September 23, 2006 10:41 AM

New York City is expensive. A million barely gets you in the door. You want cheap, there's a whole country out there. You want New York City? Be prepared to pay up.

Wait around for the bubble to burst, as you put it, and you will not see prices come down to whatever fantasy level you are waiting for.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 11:31 AM

Having lived in NYC in the late '80s, early 90s, I saw the bubble burst first hand and had friends who took significant losses on their apartments. While the price may not decrease 50% or more, it's clear a market correction is going to come eventually as it always does. And I say this as someone whose property is worth nearly 3 x what it was purchased for less than 5 years ago. I don't expect it to continue to be worth as much as it is right now.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 11:39 AM

Obviously true, my properties are worth over 3MM each. But my point is that a 50% drop is still over $1MM so whatever the previous poster is wishing for is unlikely.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 12:19 PM

Not so fast anon 12:19pm. I'm a property owner, and I think it's not unlikely that some properties somewhere in NYC will drop more than 50%. Where and what exactly, who knows?

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 12:23 PM

it's a random process.. there is also a chance that it will never fall from this point on, and we are the low for the next 5 years...it's all guesswork.

Posted by: OE at September 23, 2006 12:29 PM

I agree, this IS the low. Plus any drop more than 25% in a well established neighborhood like Park Slope would be more than just a bubble bursting, it would be a major recession and why would anyone wish for that? Secondly, there ARE a couple Park Slope co-ops listed right now that reflect a 10-20% drop in price from what they could have commanded in early 2006. Brownstoner didn't list them here, but they're out there. Anyone who is convinced prices will drop lower than $500K on a well-located co-op, will simply be paying rent for yet another year or two then paying even more to buy after that. At a higher mortgage rate, to boot. Because if the prices really did have to drop more than 25% in order to sell, most owners of properties in prime Park Slope will just hang onto them and wait to sell when the market picks back up. There'll be very low inventory to choose from.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 2:07 PM

Sylvia, the Clinton Hill coops have a lot of one bedrooms that can easily be converted to a two bedroom by closing off the dining area. The second room would be small but have a nice window. The coops there are well priced and the neighborhood is cute.

Posted by: anon at September 23, 2006 2:11 PM

thanks, anon 2:11, good suggestion. i guess that's what people end up having to do, if they really want to own. i'll definitely factor that in, if i start looking in earnest again.

and anon 11:31, temper, temper. are you a broker? have you found that being condescending is a good sales strategy? "a million barely gets you in the door"? that's just blatantly untrue, as evidenced by today's open house picks.

it's not delusional to think that i might be able to afford a 2 bedroom in a decent neighborhood if prices went down. if i had been in a position to buy 5 years ago, i certainly would've been able to afford something nice. but prices just happened to peak right around the time that i started looking to buy. bad timing, i guess. oh well.

i appreciate helpful comments like anon 2:11's. the attitude i get from other people just really irks me (and i'm sure i'm not alone in feeling like that). talk about no hablamos poor. no hablamos middle classs, either, apparently.

Posted by: sylvia at September 23, 2006 2:41 PM

To Anonymous 11:39 who lived in the City in the late 1980s and 1990s and saw the bubble burst first hand, let's look at what's different.

Then: stock market crashed in 1987, down 25% in 2 days. Now: stable to low growth market.

Then: nyc unemployment went rate from 5% to 10% in 5 years (87 to 92). Now: unemployment rate = 5% down from 8%+ 5 years ago.

Then: 1-year treasury rates at 8%-9%. Now: 5%.

Then: 3,000+ murders annually with crime driven by the crack epidemic. Now: 500+ murders annually.

Then: Gulf War. Now: Gulf War.

Oh well, not everything is better.

I moved to Brooklyn in 1983 and the period from then until the early 90s was not comparable to today. It is so much bettter now and that has shown up in real estate prices. Clearly the market is softer (and saner now), but there is no comparision to the late 80s early 90s when real estate did tank. The fundamentals now are still too good.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 3:12 PM

Anon 12:39 here - I think that some of those positive fundamentals have been driven by the booming property market. As prices soften and homeowners are unable to tap their homes for credit, the economy will slow down, unemployment will go up, and the housing market will soften/fall/crash yet again.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 4:09 PM

Anon 11:39 here - perhaps you are right, Anon 3:12, but it amazes me how many people assume property values will always go up. I remember looking at a studio in Brooklyn Heights for something like $90,000 in the late '80s, which was too expensive for me to buy. A few years later, you could buy a 1 bedroom for $65,000. I would bet we are not yet at a low, but hopefully, due to the reasons you mention, the fall won't be too hard. But the huge increase in prices in just a few years in some neighborhoods just isn't the norm.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 6:17 PM

3:12 poster here again.

Do not agree that the housing boom in NYC drove the local positive fundamentals. First, NYC is an anomaly. It is a renters city (something like 75%). For better or worse, participation in wealth created by increasing real estate values has been narrow. Second, while the housing boom did drive residential construction, NYC has commercial construction to pick up the slack now that residential real estate is soft. This is different than many parts of the country. NYC is going to see a large amount of commerical construction activity since commercial space is scarce right now. I know this for a fact since my business leases space and our lease is expiring. Our rent is tripling from when we signed the lease 10 years ago. If unemployment stays solid, so will housing.

All that said, poster at 4:09 is right. The huge price increases over the past few years isn't the norm. When I do my own financial planning, I guestimate annual house apprecitation for my house at 1%-3% over the next 10 years. At that appreciation rate, house values go up by 10%-35% with the increase in value not subject to capital gains. During that 10 year time you get the benefit of mortgage interest tax deductibility + a reasonable stable monthly housing payment (unlike rents which will climb faster than 1%-3% per year). Lastly, as an owner you control the property you live in, not some landlord. Still seems like owning is better than renting.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 7:54 PM

When I came to NY in 1993, my first studio apt. in Manhattan was $500/month. That year Giuliani won the election, and everything has changed after. Rent market has become so tight and drove many people out from Manhattan and many parts of Brooklyn. I believe the market will be corrected soon, as many people say. Crash? I don't know. But I feel every dollar we spend for our house is worth than paying rent.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2006 11:08 PM

No one can know whether we're in for a 'soft landing' or crash, whether or when prices pause or fall or start to rise. Too many unknowns from too many external factors. Rather than look back to 80s NY, the best I can think of is compare to recent markets in comparable cities. The anomaly arguments about NY being a different or special market can be made for London UK and Sydney AU. The economic conditions in these cities are broadly comparable to those here, with some differences in timing: they peaked 2-3 years ahead of NY. London appears to have been flat since 2003 and Sydney is down about 10-15% overall in that time.

So I'd be surpised if prices started rising again faster than inflation here before the end of the decade, and I'd also be surprised if they'd fallen more than 10-15%. Best guess is that what people are willing to pay a month as a percentage of salary on a new mortgage stays about the same for a few years and prices move sideways according to interest rates.

Posted by: doctor_j at September 24, 2006 10:20 AM

Those who are saying prices won't be rising as fast, that's certainly true. But just because rising prices have slowed (to return to normal) doesn't mean it's a "crash". I think those here who are trying to point that out to renters who are hoping to buy - it's not to be nasty, it's to be helpful. Because it could be a good idea to go ahead and buy now or within the next several months while sales have slowed and sellers are unsure of what's next. You could pick up a good deal if you find a very motivated seller who needs to sell before the end of 2006.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 24, 2006 3:15 PM

Now is a great time to buy. Interest rates are still at a very low point because people think the fed might lower rates further. But once they start tightening, and rates rise again, it'll be a tough time to sell and to buy. That's okay if you don't believe me. Just wait, I think a lot of us on here remember the many, many years when mortgage rates were in the double digits. I bought in the early '90's in Park Slope and things just sat and sat on the market for years because nobody could afford to sell for less than what they paid for a place and nobody could afford to buy until the rates went down. Also parts of Park Slope were truly scary after dark then, as they were in much of NYC. Now it really is safer, much more commercial activity in many parts of Bklyn where there was nothing to speak of after dusk. And many communities worked hard to get their local schools to improve. And so now people are paying more to live in these areas as a result.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 24, 2006 9:27 PM

um...interest rates weren't in double digits in the early 90's. i bought in park slope in 93 and our interest rate was 7 percent. Not that bad. Interest rates now are still historically low, despite the uptick...

Posted by: Anonymous at September 25, 2006 7:39 AM

Speaking of 201 Clinton Hill, I closed a deal for my cousin in 2000, one of the 1 bedrooms with a dining room, for 65K. They're probably going to 275k these days. At the time, I thought the complex was too project like, but now, the neighborhood has changed a lot. Vacany rates are down and ownership % are up. Would have been a good investment had I had the foresight. Should of bought 3.

Posted by: Big D at September 25, 2006 10:08 AM

I did see the 201 Clinton Ave. I like the Brownstoner site and congratulations! But this "pick" was a blunder. Located in a project with 4 high buildings. Nothing wrong with that but 455k is too steep.

Posted by: Tomorama at September 27, 2006 4:47 PM

Uh, the Co-ops are not projects. I live in the South Campus and can tell you they are not projects!

Posted by: Anonymous at September 27, 2006 9:21 PM

According to ACRIS it looks like unit 10C in the same building sold for the exact same price just 8 months ago, so maybe 455K isn't a stretch just a reflection of the market in that area. Other 2BDs are selling for almost 100K just one block away.

Posted by: Grwdhghts4ever at September 28, 2006 7:50 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions