Newsletter |

House of the Day: 81 Bainbridge

househouse
We're having a hard time understanding why this stunning brownstone on Bainbridge in Stuyvesant Heights hasn't moved. When we included it in Open House Picks back in early May (2005! Whoops), we thought it was a no brainer. (And maybe it was: That was over a year ago.) Granted it's a three-family that is going to need some updating, but the historic details are top of the line and it's one of the best brownstone blocks around. We also heard from one reader that he thought some work had been done in the mean time. The seller hasn't budged on price (actually the price has ticked up a smidge to $900,000 from where it was last year). This is probably a good strategy. When the right buyer walks through the door, he/she will be more than willing to pay the price.
Open House Picks 5/13/05 [Brownstoner]
81 Bainbridge [Corcoran] GMAP P*Shark



40 Comments

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 11:55 AM


Mr. B,
I don't think you meant to insert "May 13 Open House Picks" as the link you want us to pursue. Not only does the Bainbridge house not appear there, but that thread got completely blitzed with spam.

By mcteague on September 11, 2006 12:18 PM

a year ago, we got $1450 and $1495 for 1 1/2 and two bdrms, respectively, just a short walk from this property.

By mcteague on September 11, 2006 12:20 PM

actually, this property is closer to the express A train, and it is a much tighter rental market now, so the rentals might fetch a bit more.

By mcteaguez on September 11, 2006 12:21 PM

actually, this property is closer to the express A train, and it is a much tighter rental market now, so the rentals might fetch a bit more.

By lp on September 11, 2006 12:23 PM

Wow, those pics of the details are really beautiful.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 12:49 PM

If the two are common, what's the implication: that the police are dealing drugs? Don't take the bait folks....

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 1:09 PM

Just a warning there is a lot of drug dealing in the area, buyers be careful with that and the unstable market

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 1:19 PM

Duh! Thanks for stating the obvious!

By donatella on September 11, 2006 1:46 PM

The pictures are beautiful, but it's not done and it's not clear how not done it is. There are no kitchens. Does that mean there are crappy floors and bathrooms? One thing I learned from my renovation is how LONG everything takes and 900,000 dollars, more construction, fixtures, etc. It's not cheap for a house that won't have tenants for a while. And as more stuff comes on the market, people are a little more cautious about putting big money into Bed Sty. I don't know, not seeing the place those are my impressions. And there is this nasty problem of violent crime, that nobody wants to talk about....

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 1:56 PM

it is worth $500k, which is what the owner paid for it in feb 2005. Not a dime more.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 2:41 PM


This is a tough market to justify buying an expensive fixer-upper in unless the location is spectacular and the purchase price is really low.

I've been in the renovation business for ten years and my most recent "flip" took much longer to sell than I'd expected.

Unexperienced buyers can expect their renovation costs to be at least 50% above their initial estimates and that it will take them about two years from start to finish to complete a total gut rehab.

In this market, one needs serious cajones to buy a 1 million dollar fixer upper in a borderline neighborhood. I sure as hell wouldn't do it.

By BedStuyGuy on September 11, 2006 2:44 PM

To the person who wrote that the house is worth $500,000 - perhaps you are trying to be philosophical about what any building or apartment is "worth" - but the idea that the market values this property at $500,000 is ridiculous. Just look at any comps. I've seen the house and it does need mechanical upgrades - but the bones are spectacular. I think it may very well sell for around asking price.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 3:03 PM

I totally agree with you the house is worth what he paid $500k not a dime more the area is not that good

By OE on September 11, 2006 3:03 PM

some contractors know the price will be higher, but don't tell the owner because he is still in the delusional phase of his renovation.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 3:17 PM

I also saw this house and I remember thinking that it needed a huge amount of work. The original parquet floors were quite water-damaged; so much so that there was no salvaging them. At the time, I wondered how much water damage might be hidden in the walls. My general impression was that you'd have to pump at least another $200k into the place to get it fixed up. The Corcoran pictures show the front hallway/front parlor (not including the photo of the stained glass window, which I think was in an upstairs bathroom). From what I remember, this was the only part of the house that was remotely presentable. I'd be curious to see what work has been done on the house in the meanwhile.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 3:31 PM

I think this house is worth $175k. Now sell it to me!

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 3:40 PM

okay I do think this house is priced high but I pretty much think that about everything. however, my opinion has nothing to do with "a lot of drug dealing in the area" or it "not being that good of an area" because thats a lie. I think the neighborhood is great and thats a nice street. get over yourselves. by the same token I live on macdonough which is arguably the best street in stuy heights in a beautifully maintained brownstone and there's no way I'd pay 1495 for rent. whoever it was that was pulling those numbers lucked up on some foolish tenants. maybe they'd just moved here from europe or something and didn't know the difference. as far as the rent question I'd say if you make the rental nice you can get 1350 for a 1.5 bdrm and more for a 2 bdrm obviously. rentals are not cheap in stuy heights, obviously they're lower than ft greene but don't fool yourself thinking people are pricing homes near the million dollar mark and getting 1100 for rent thats just ridiculous.

By HC on September 11, 2006 4:02 PM

I agree with Anon 3:17. I went to see it back in May. Although it had some nice bones, it needed a ton of work. The current owner's contractor even started "improvements" by tearing out the great cedar closets that are common to these houses. Put in 300K and you'd might have a house worth $1.2M in this neighborhood. Not so good after closing expenses. . .

I love the houses on this stretch of Bainbridge, it's very convenient to the Utica subway stop, and I could definitely see spending over $1M on a place in Bed-Stuy. Just not this one.

They're hanging tough on the price though - it's been on the market a while, so why not raise the price $5K?

Hang on to your deal on MacDonough - there are definitely people paying more than you seem to think is appropriate for nice 1- and 2-BR brownstone apts.

By HC on September 11, 2006 4:03 PM

I have to give the broker credit for having photos that show it in it's best possible light . . .

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 4:27 PM


Why would somebody pay over a million for a townhouse in a borderline area like Bed Stuy? The difference between the cost to buy and the cost to rent is so enormous, it doesn't make sense.

There's a direct relationship between a property's rental income and its price. That relationship has been temporarily forgotten in the soaring real estate market of the last couple of years.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 4:46 PM

this area isn't priced over a million dollars so that arguement is highly irrelevant and the reason you'd pay top dollar in bedstuy is because you're not going to find anything comparable anywhere else for a decent price with the same amount of detail.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 4:51 PM

"And there is this nasty problem of violent crime, that nobody wants to talk about...."

Donatella, you've obviously lost your senses today. Crime is all we ever talk about when the discussion falls on areas like Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy, PLG and Crown Heights. It's so redundant and boring at this stage. Everyone knows that crime is a problem in these nabes - has been for decades and if you don't know then you need to get your head examined. Further, who doesn't factor issues like crime and schools when making decisions on where to raise one's family? It's so retarded that folks on this board think otherwise. Do you think that people have not contemplated these issues before investing $750k-$1mm into these communities or are you simply smarter than everyone else? Don't insult people's intelligence and don't pretend that you or anyone else is providing insights into anything else but the very obvious. Crime and schooling is indeed an issue in these nabes; not always as big as some people would make it and not always as small. With that being said, these nabes are improving fast and many homeowners have done remarkably well by placing smart bets on living in architecturally significant communities that are rough around the edges. When buying in Brownstone Brooklyn, you simply have to weigh the pros and the cons and so far the cons have not dissuaded new families from moving into these communities. Granted, it might be far too great of a risk for you or I to take but it doesn't mean that we are right and they are wrong. To each his own....

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 5:07 PM

We ARE getting those rents in Bed Stuy and it is a lovely area. Period. Have you been there recently? I see more and more hipsters every day, whether that's for better or worse. Obviously, the word is out about Bed Stuy and there is no turning back.
The house looks gorgeous from the photos, but of course the photographer was trying to make the house look good. I just looked back on my "before" shots of my own renovation and it doesn't look like the place needed anything more than a paint job. Of course, it needed to be gutted. My point? You have to see it in person.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 5:12 PM


That was very well stated Anon 4:51. Thank you.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 5:17 PM

this raises another topic that is obviously inaccurate in the mind of the masses. you're getting 1495 for rent in bedstuy? who the hell is paying that? I am bedstuy's biggest cheerleader and happiest resident and but as I stated before I'd think someone is a fool to pay 1495 for a 1 bdrm in bedstuy. I've seen 2 bdrm garden rentals for 1400 but I don't consider that comparable. having sole access to a garden and considering the ground floor layout on most of the brownstones you cant compare that to the upper rentals. I just can't believe someone would pay almost 1500 to rent a 1 bedroom in bedstuy. not that its not a great neighborhood but that's just not realistic. although I think using an agent to rent an apartment is just stupid (unless its no-fee), I use the real estate spot on stuyvesant and macdonough to give me a broad idea of what is acceptable in the neighborhood and what's going on around the area and I've yet to see someone posting 1495 for a 1 bedroom even if they're using a broker... that said, I could be wrong. that's just my opinion. if you're getting over on someone so nicely in bedstuy good for you I'm all for making top dollar.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 5:44 PM

there is a lot of crime in fort greene!? wow thats news to me

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 5:47 PM


Over a million includes the cost to renovatate . . . I guess my argument is perfectly valid.

I don't mean to diss Bed Stuy, but it other suburban parts of this country a nice house on a good sized lot can be purchased for less than 300k.

Why pay huge bucks to live somewhere that's potentially dangerous after dark and as of yet has few ammenities?

Do you really think the neighboorhood will change that fast?

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 6:22 PM

In "other suburban parts of this country a nice house on a good sized lot can be purchased for less than 300k."

This comparison has absolutely no role in this discussion. It compares apples to oranges.

By mcteague on September 11, 2006 6:37 PM

anon at 3:40 and 5:17: i have fabulous tenants and great relationships with all of them. i've turned over the 2 bedroom once already this year with the same result. we advertised for less than two weeks and got tenants at those prices no problemo. BTW, pay attention, i said 1 1/2 bedroom and 2 bedroom. if you own on Macdonough and don't understand the rental market, use every ounce of will you have to admit maybe you don't know as much as you thought you did, or maybe put some more thought into your own rentals without disparaging renters who are willing to pay a little extra for a very nicely renovated, well maintained place to live on a beautiful tree-lined block with a good, thoughtful landlord. We've been renters before we bought our house long enough to know that such a combination is very hard to find in any neighborhood. BTW, we intentionally did not use a broker to rent our apartments because we did not want people to throw money at a broker to do what they were obviously capable and shrewd enough to do themselves.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 6:38 PM

"There is a lot of crime in fort greene!? wow thats news to me"

Get your head out of the sand and stop living in La La Land. Though somewhat isolated, Fort Greene has a serious crime problem. Who are you kidding? The Whitman and Ingersol Houses are two of the most crime plagued housing projects in the city. Attend the 88th Precent Community Council meetings and get informed. Ignorance is not an excuse. With that being said, despite these drawbacks, FG is a great community. My favorite in Brooklyn.

By NeoGrec on September 11, 2006 7:25 PM

"Last up, first down" -- isn't that the tired but true cliche of RE recessions? It seems inevitable that Bed Stuy would see the correction before other neighborhoods where long term value is more of a sure thing.

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 7:37 PM

I agree whitman/ingersoll houses better know as Ft.Greene projects are the worst in the City so anyone who does not think so should walk down Myrtle ave cross carlton and let me know what think if they don't get shot.

By Arsenic and Old Lace on September 11, 2006 7:57 PM

Is that the house with details to die for, but was used as an SRO and is trashed and needs all new plumbing, electric, kitchens and bathrooms?

I know I went to one open house last year in that nab and the place did have intact details, but it also had peeling walls, decaying haunted house vibe going. The floor plan looks familiar, the house I'm thinking of had cute shaving closets and butler pantries.

Or is this another "diamond in the rough" kinda place?

By Anonymous on September 11, 2006 8:03 PM

mcteague - I don't own I rent and I pay 1350 for a 1.5 bedroom so your rant about not knowing the rental market and will and blah blah blah is for the birds. I think 1400 is the ceiling. I don't believe what you are renting is representing the norm in the nabe. my apartment is GORGEOUS to say the least two WORKING fireplaces, beautifully restored wood floors spacious with loads of details and obviously macdonough is tree lined (the greenest block in brooklyn for years, in fact). I stand by my initial comment, your tenants are fools to say the least to pay you 1495 for rent. you're either lucky, lying, or proving to us all that there's a sucker born every minute.

By anon on September 11, 2006 9:20 PM

Anon 4:51 - thank you! I agree very well said...so tired of hearing so much crap about bed-stuy. And in terms of the rental market - we have four apts which are floor throughs - not even distinct one bedrooms (3 rooms +kitch/bath) and two are $1600 and two are $1550. We have FABULOUS tenants and just refilled one last week with what appear to be more fabulous tenants. There is a wide range of rents in bedstuy and the nice houses with train access ARE getting this much. Really. Now all naysayers, please come visit so you can see how great our neighborhood is before you keep trashing it.

By anonymous on September 12, 2006 1:44 AM

cheers, mcteague and anon.

By mcteague on September 12, 2006 1:59 AM

hmmm...to get $50 above your "ceiling" for a 1 1/2 = i'm a "liar" or my tenant's a "sucker"? persuausive stuff...

By donatella on September 12, 2006 1:53 PM

Donatella here.... I just had my head examined. I spanked myself too. OK, that issue of violent crime IS something you talk about. Hey, I wish you the best 4:51, relax, I wouldn't pay 900,000 for that place though.

By Michael on September 12, 2006 2:07 PM

Bed Stuy is beautiful, historic, and good people. But I don't quite get all the back and forth on this board. It's clear that the market has said that the owners (or Corcoran pushing them and trying trying to "pop" another neighborhood)is asking too much. You expect someone to stroll in after a year, at a time when market has softened, and meet the price?

And the tooth fairy will be making house calls ...

By Michael on September 12, 2006 2:10 PM

Bed Stuy is beautiful, historic, and good people. But I don't quite get all the back and forth on this board. It's clear that the market has said that the owners (or Corcoran pushing them and trying trying to "pop" another neighborhood)is asking too much. You expect someone to stroll in after a year, at a time when market has softened, and meet the price?

And the tooth fairy will be making house calls ...

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Related Posts with Thumbnails