« Get Psyched for the FG House Tour Sunday Monday Linkage »

May 5, 2006

Open House Picks

housePark Slope
377 Third Street
Brown Harris Stevens
Sunday 12:30-2
$2,399,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseCobble Hill
11 Warren Place
Prudential Douglas Elliman
Sunday 4-5
$1,275,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseBedford Stuyvesant
720 Marcy Avenue
Nat Rambod
Sunday 1-3
$999,000
GMAP P*Shark

houseWest Midwood
777 Rugby Road
Mary Kay Gallagher
Sunday 1-3
$950,000
GMAP P*Shark




Comments

My two cents: the bed-stuy house has an ominous front door; they've also done what i hate to parlor windows -- installing a dummy piece on the top to permit a standard size window to fit.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 11:49 AM

the warren place house is so tiny - 9 foot wide, it is way over $1000 per usable square foot. But if I was a rich single struggling writer picking up women in the expensive coffee shops of the area, I'd be all over it like a rash.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 11:55 AM

Is that the first push towards $1MM in Bed-Stuy??? Wow..

Posted by: NewStoner at May 5, 2006 11:56 AM

There have been a few over $1-million in Bed-Stuy. I believe the one on Stuyvesant is supposed to have gone into contract at $1.2.

Posted by: HC at May 5, 2006 12:05 PM

I would personally pick a location on Stuyvesant over one on Marcy any day. Especially the southern end of it.

Posted by: HC at May 5, 2006 12:07 PM

to think the Warren Mews house was once considered 'affordable housing' for the working class....

Posted by: chickenmadness at May 5, 2006 12:13 PM

Two thumbs up for the Warren Street and Third Street properties. Would not be surprised if they moved quickly.

Posted by: crouchback at May 5, 2006 12:16 PM

One thumbs up on the Rugby Road house, even though there are no interior pics. Looks really nice from here, and still under the 1M mark.

Posted by: GLF at May 5, 2006 12:44 PM

If someone looks at the photos of the 3rd St. house, could they please explain to me why BHS chose to put that chair in the corner of the empty room when they photographed it? Are they trying to say something about the scale of the room? I'm baffled by that one!

Posted by: west at May 5, 2006 12:46 PM

I suppose the Mews house is worth it to someone. However, these places are beyond small, each floor is about 400 square feet, and the stairs between floors are VERY cramped. My wife and I looked at one of these about 10 years ago, they were around 300k max at time, but too small for us. However, according to propshark it has 4,260 sq ft of buildable far!

Posted by: anon at May 5, 2006 12:47 PM

The 1901 rugby house looks awesome. plus a crazy 2 car garage...let's party. it is a 40 x 100 foot lot though and the interior could be scary. Still you get light from all angles vs. the front and the back as those brownstones go. I still think the Ditmas area is one of the best values in Brooklyn. Too bad there is so little inventory.

Posted by: anon at May 5, 2006 12:52 PM

I bet the 3rd St house goes for more than asking. Sounds like its in decent condition. That's a great block, central location in the middle of just about everything (other than being a bit of hike to the subway).

Posted by: Miguel at May 5, 2006 1:00 PM

No photos of the interior of the Rugby house makes me nervous. Plus, I think you've got to read between the lines of the broker lingo: "Charming" usually means "needs work". Whereas "stunning" usually means you could move right in, though it may not be to your taste.

Posted by: west at May 5, 2006 1:01 PM

"unique" means a layout only a lunatic could put up with. "drenched with sunlight" means that you may not actually need lamps on during the day. "winter views" means there is a tree covering the windows. "bring your architect" means gut renovation. "needs a little TLC" means gut renovation. "bring it back to its former greatness" means money-pit.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 1:10 PM

720 Marcy Ave in Bed-Stuy is a joke! Who are they kidding? That section of BS barely commands $600k let alone $1mm. How far is this from Marcy Projects? Also, log onto PShark and check out all of the transactions associated with this property. I can't follow the trail. Is any of it unusual? Looks like a flip. Didn't this property just exchange hands at $500k in 12/05. That was probably the right price for this section of BS. $1mm is laughable!!

Posted by: BrownBomber at May 5, 2006 1:16 PM

Thanks for the Broker's lexicon lesson 1:10PM. LOL.

Posted by: crouchback at May 5, 2006 1:25 PM

Why would anyone buy anything in Bed-Stuy is not clear to me. You can buy a great apartment in Park Slope and even in Manhattan for 1 mil. Bed-Stuy is a dump.

Posted by: Leo at May 5, 2006 1:35 PM

The property is far away from Marcy Projects. I think you mean the Lexington Houses. I don't understand why you had to make sure that you mentioned that -- anyway.

As much as I love every area of Bed-Stuy, I have to agree that this particular spot has not arrived at that asking price. Seller's start hearing that in Bed-Stuy a house went for $1MM and they start thinking...hey my house is in the Stuy too...hmmm. But as a seller, you have to realize that not only are you selling your home, but the amenities also. The A/C trains are about 12 blocks away and the G train is quite a walk as well. So I think that this house is certainly over priced, but I'm no expert.

Posted by: anon at May 5, 2006 1:37 PM

Leo,

Your comments are so untrue. Have you ever visited Bed-Stuy? Sure, it has its areas, but to call it a dump it's very extreme. Before you post such an ignorant comment familiarize yourself first.

Posted by: faithful at May 5, 2006 1:42 PM

Thanks for the comment Leo. It was much appreciated.

If you want to go down this road today, please go to the Archive section and read countless threads on BS, Gentrification, Owning an Apt v. Brownstone, Brownstone Brooklyn, Downtown Brooklyn Development Projects, NYC History, yadayadayadayada..... The rest of us will actually like to engage in some meaningful dialogue.

Posted by: BrownBomber at May 5, 2006 1:45 PM

Easy BrownBomber, what Leo said is totallly on point. Marcy projects are pretty far from there, and the PJ's that are around this area are all fairly small and sprinkled about. And what's more, I know of some smallere houses in the area that have sold for around 700K. But the fact remians that 1 mil for this house is indeed a joke. It's just not that nice a property, probably has a standard flip reno, and has a tiny yard. But, the park in front of it could be really nice one day...

Posted by: Drew at May 5, 2006 2:06 PM

warren house is tiny but parking space and big garden are making it up for it.
It will sell easly, all it takes is a frustrated couple lokking for two bedroom apt in Manhattan.
Warren place hauses are so cute.

Posted by: malymis at May 5, 2006 2:07 PM

The Rugby Road house could be in OK condition, despite lack of pix. This listing went up very recently, and sometimes it takes Mary Kay a while to get the pix. Still, even if it does need some cosmetics, it seems to be priced to sell (although things have dropped a little bit here over the past year, it seems - or else MKG is just pricing low - the Victorian on Beverley Road went above ask and it was priced at 999k). The other reasons the house could be priced under the 1 million mark is that West Midwood stretches all the way down to Avenue H, has a lot of active red-bricking in that part of the nabe, and is quite a ways from Prospect Park and the ever improving amenities of Cortelyou Road. You need your car for groceries, etc..., whereas Ditmas Parkers and Park Westers, PPS residents and the Beverley crowd can easily get away without one most of the time.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 2:12 PM

Drew -- I believe that you're agreeing with anon 1:37 not Leo.

Posted by: faithful at May 5, 2006 2:20 PM

Is the price on that bed stuy house for real?

Not that great of a block or street, IMO.

I'm guessing that since there are no interior picks, the inside ain't all that.

Posted by: Pietro at May 5, 2006 2:37 PM

"It will sell easly, all it takes is a frustrated couple lokking for two bedroom apt in Manhattan. "

It has been listed for over a month.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 3:08 PM

Bed-Stuy brokers are the dumbest people on earth. I don't understand their insane obsession with the $1mm price mark in Bed-Stuy. There are 6,000 brownstones in Bed-Stuy and you will never create the critical turnover in brownstone ownership that is necessary to gentrify and turn the area into the next Fort Greene or Clinton Hill.

Who are the folks buying in BS? For the most part it's people who are not rich, looking for value and willing to make some compromises with respect to the neighborhood and its lack of amenities. At $1mm you are pricing out a lot of first time homebuyers who would otherwise consider BS because of the great brownstone stock. IMHO, it's far better if 1,000 homes exchanged hands at $500k then 10 homes at $1mm. Brokers have to understand that BS is not a sprint but rather a marathon, i.e., getting to FG/CH status will take some time. In this regard, prices can not get ahead of the neighborhood. I firmly believe that brokers must do a better job of explaining this basic concept to prospective sellers. Right now expectations are too unrealistic.

I don't care about brownstone prices in FG and CH. Those nabes are much further along in the gentrification experiment. FG/CH are much smaller communities, so gentrification there was more easily obtained. In the beginning, FG/CH prices stayed low enough to bring about a critical demographic change. If you have 150 home sales over a five year period in FG/CH that produced a sizeable demographic shift because the area is so small. This in turn promoted economic and real estate development in the community.

However, the same 150 in Bed-Stuy would not even be a drop in the bucket. It's the largest neighborhood in New York City and has the city's largest concentration of intact brownstones. The turnover that Bed-Stuy needs is in the thousands not hundreds. With that being said, that critical turnover will never be achieved if every seller, no matter the section of the nabe, thinks that he or she can get $1mm for their property. It's time to put on the breaks. Obviously the free market is going to determine the rate of change and development in Bed-Stuy but I just think that it's in the nabe's best long term interest if prices at the very least stabilized. Some folks don't want to hear this but BS needs gentrification and given it's large minority and underclass population it's not going to happen if brokers start pricing every damn brownstone over a $1mm. To Brokers: Please put on the brakes - you're biting off your nose to spite your face. In such a large brownstone community, you should be more concerned with volume rather than sale price milestones.

Posted by: BrownBomber at May 5, 2006 3:09 PM

BrownBomber, great post but you're leaving out that brokers' fiduciary responsibility is to the seller, not the neighborhood. If a broker can possibly get that $1M and doesn't try to, he/she is pretty much committing malpractice. You make a good case for what Bed Stuy needs but I don't think it's reasonable to ask it of the brokers. Talk to your next neighbor who puts their house on the market. (If you live in Bed Stuy, don't remember.)

Posted by: linusvanpelt at May 5, 2006 3:27 PM

RE Warren Street: Nice 2 bedroom apartments on the upper west side can now be had for under 1M. The mid-size coop market has dropped a good deal in Manhattan. So I would not count on too many frustrated buyers rushing to buy Bklyn properies at 1.3M.

RE BS: Fabulous post Brownbomber. The same basic argument can be made for pricing in most "fringe" areas--the best possible thing for the neighborhoods' long-term growth and development is slow and steady increases that allow the "mid-range" buyers who are priced out of other areas and who are historically the people who help to gentrify areas. But that is not in the best interest of either sellers or realtors.

But people should at least think twice before they applaud rampaging price increases. They're great if you plan on selling--but they are not great if you actually intend to stay in the area.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 3:39 PM

The Rubgy house is out of Ditmas Park area and more in the Midwood/Brooklyn College area. Big difference in price for the location. Mary Kay has a nice map of Victorian Flatbush on her site here http://www.marykayg.com/html/vic_flatbush.html#

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 3:52 PM

It is a great post BB- and I'm sure the points you raised haven't been brought up often enough.But I would hope that the minority population is included in and part of that process.

I loved the Warren Mews house- tiny though it may be. I love that complex- used to walk through the gardens on my way to volunteer work in Red Hook. So beautiful there- like another world.

My hesitation with the Bed-Stuy house is that it is 4 family. For me I would rather have1, maybe 2 family. It's hard to tell since they have no interior shots- for that price there should be a ton of them.

Posted by: Bx2Bklyn at May 5, 2006 4:06 PM

Warren St has been on the market for a month at least so it's not exactly being "snapped up".

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 4:09 PM

Excellent point Linus. Indeed I'm very much aware of the brokers fiduciary duty to his or her client. However, fiduciary duty and market sensibility are not mutually exclusive. Though sellers ultimately determine price, one of the primary responsibilities of a broker is to inject common sense into the equation based upon their professional experience. Brokers when pitching their business must be realistic when gauging "fair market value" and should manage sellers expectations accordingly. With respect to under pricing, brokers rarely ever undervalue and misprice properties on the downside because the free market would invariably drive the price higher, i.e., generate a bidding war.

I live in CH but own various investment properties in the area. I have a vested interest in the nabe but I don't want prices going up too quickly. Keeping Bed-Stuy affordable in the near term is in the best long term interest of the neighborhood.

Posted by: BrownBomber at May 5, 2006 4:12 PM

777 Rugby is actually just off the above ground train tracks (Q/B) - on the Coney Island Avenue side. The price justifies the location! Remember, the trains run 24/7 - and won't be far from your bedroom window.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 4:14 PM

Linus,

Thank you for bringing some sense to this thread. Good Grief. To compare a 20x50 house on Stuyvesant and Decater to a 18x42 house on Marcy & Greene...on an 18x78 lot??? Can we for once compare apples to apples? And to condemn an entire nabe because there are some housing projects, is borderline ignorant. Now if you have a preference NOT to live in a particular nabe, there's no need to condemn those that find a reason to do so. If you want to comment on the asking price on a given house.. That's fair game. So again. $1MM for that place IMO is a bit of a stretch.

Posted by: NewStoner at May 5, 2006 4:18 PM

I live in Ditmas Park and frickin' love it. I was curious what generally holds people back from buying a house in that neighborhood? We've got good bus and subway, parking, a friendly diverse community, an up and coming commercial strip (Cortelyou Rd)with 3 new business' opening this summer, a farmers market and of course Prospect Park. You can still buy 1 bedroom coops for $130,000-230,000. The area has great history and lots of beautiful evening walks through the spooky Victorian mansions of Prospect Park South. Would love to hear some thoughts...

Posted by: anon at May 5, 2006 4:23 PM

I love Ditmas Park. Grand beautiful homes on nice well kept streets. Quiet and charming. Though excellent bus and train service, perhaps the car/taxi ride is a little bit too long for the taste of some. What's the fastest way by car to Manhattan?

Posted by: BrownBomber at May 5, 2006 4:56 PM

What do you all think of this listing? Just hit the market. There won't be an open house because its entirely occupied by tenants. Its on Prospect Place between Flatbush and 6th Ave.

Disclosures: I own the house next door. Would love to see a brownstone fan buy it and TLC it up right.

Posted by: anon at May 5, 2006 4:57 PM

To BrownBomber - I'm not Anon 4:23 but
It'a actually a pretty quick trip into Manhattan - Ocean Pkway which becomes the Prospect which becomes the Gowanus (at Hamilton Ave vicinity).

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 5:01 PM

And then Gowanus to the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel, right? Wow! That's very fast! I'm surprised that more Wall Street professionals are not buying in Ditmas. The commute by car is a cinch!

Posted by: BrownBomber at May 5, 2006 5:06 PM

Best way from Ditmas to Manhattan:

I take Ocean to the Prospect Expressway to the battery tunnel you're there in 10 minutes (no exaggeration if you have ez pass) but you have to pay the 4.50 toll but its always worth it...

Posted by: anon at May 5, 2006 5:08 PM

anon 4:58pm, which listing?
(price? / title of listing?)

Their site does not allow for providing direct links (at least not easily).

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 5:13 PM

I think one has to copy this link and paste into a browser.

http://ritaknox.com/Template18/NextPage.asp?OrderId=130&SuppId=
249101&LanguageId=0&FileName=featurelist/listings.asp

Its asking $2.1mm. Title is "Best of Both Worlds"

Posted by: anon at May 5, 2006 5:35 PM

"I own the house next door. Would love to see a brownstone fan buy it and TLC it up right."

Can you be more specific about the number on prospect place? I want to shark it.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 5:50 PM

The Rugby Road listing is not in MIDWOOD. West Midwood, South Midwood (Brooklyn College), and Midwood Park are part of Victorian Flatbush. Midwood is an entirely different world. Even though these neighborhoods are just south of Ditmas Park (if you take that group of streets as the central hub of Vic. Flatbush), they have very little in common with Midwood proper (with the possible exception of Manhattan Terrace - the northern tip of Midwood that abuts Avenue H - it was originally conceived as part of the greater Flatbush Victorian Housing boom).

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 6:57 PM

I live in Ditmas Park, and am not totally crazy about it. I find it has the disadvantages of the suburbs (no restaurants, cafes, activity in the streets, you have to drive everywhere), with few of the advantages (it's not peaceful, or quiet, or clean, the schools aren't great and there is city crime). I have a pretty porch and garden, but don't enjoy it due to the noise of the subway and traffic, boombox cars etc.

The houses are gorgeous, but maintenance is not cheap. My oil heating bill was about $800/month this winter.

I don't feel particularly close to Prospect Park, I still have to load my kids into the car to get there. And I don't find the neighbors particularly chummy either, I guess I just haven't had the good fortune to find the welcoming crowd.

Those are the disadvantages, imo, to living in Ditmas Park. It's so physically pretty (especially now in the spring), and most residents love it -- but it's not for everybody.

Posted by: feelingdesperate at May 5, 2006 7:05 PM

Feelingdesperate, I guess I'm on the other end of the spectrum. I moved to Ditmas from Park Slope and prefer it here. There are fewer amenities here, it's true, but I don't understand why you have to drive everywhere. The Q is practically at my doorstep and the F is a short walk away. Much, much easier than driving! In any case, I hope it begins to grow on you...I'm really happy in Ditmas.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 7:28 PM

Oh, by the way, I walked by the Rugby Road house earlier today and it's quite a looker from the outside. I'm really curious to know what the interior is like. I'm much rather blow almost a mil on a big place like that than on some matchbox in PS!

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 7:31 PM

Address is 92 Prospect Place. I think the seller bought it a very long time ago for nothing. Its definitely NOT a flip.

Posted by: anon at May 5, 2006 7:39 PM

The Rugby house does look gorgeous, I absolutely agree, and I wish I could afford it.

Don't you find that you need a car to do the grocery shopping, Anon. 7:28? I lived here for several months without a car, and yes it's possible, but life is much easier with one. But I guess that is one of Ditmas Park's advantages -- driveways to park your car in!

Posted by: feelingdesperate at May 5, 2006 7:56 PM

About the Warren Place mews... Whoever mentioned before that it was meant as a working place cottage is right.. they were built in 1877 by Alfred Tredway White as homes for the working class.. My great-grandmother owned one of them for many years, where she raised her family.. But times change, prices go up, such is New York. Nobody can expect a city like this to stay static.

Posted by: mm at May 5, 2006 7:57 PM

I moved from the Slope to Vic. Flatbush, and overall, I do prefer it here. But that may because I live a stone's throw from Cortelyou Road. I still push my shopping cart to the grocery store and the co-op, the hardware store, etc... I drive just slightly more than I did when I lived in the slope and never have to deal with alternate side of the street parking. I don't think the schools here are bad - if your child is bright make the most of the Eagle and Cig programs. Some corners are noisier, dirtier than others. We were lucky - we live in Beverly Square West and the neighbors are great, the Park is an easy walk, and Cortelyou Road is around the corner. I don't think I would enjoy living in any of of the Midwoods half as much. There are times I pine for the "city" - and by that I mean the real thing - Manhattan, NOT Park Slope. But when I think about how happy my kids are in my beautiful house with their great back yard and how far away from Manhattan we would be if we moved to somewhere like Nyack (some of our friends are out there now), I really think Vic. Flatbush has been a great choice for us. We never have to plan ages in advance to go to a great restaurant or an art house cinema and then pay a babysitter tons of extra money for the commute. My husband is home in 35 minutes door to door on the Q (he works long hours to start). It can be the right choice for many people. But like I said, I think living in the northern section makes a big difference. I think Midwood Park is gorgeous, but I think I would feel a lot more isolated there, or in S. or W. Midwood, for that matter. Even Ditmas Park West feels that much further away to me sometimes...

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 8:59 PM

Anon 1:10. Awesome "translation" of the broker lexicon. Esp. love "restore it to its former greatness"! You could teach a "bsl" class.

Posted by: west at May 5, 2006 9:12 PM

Re: 777 Rugby Road is so new on the market, we did not have time to get indoor photos.
This is a good house
Nothing deceptive about it
Best offer.....it goes........mkg

Posted by: Mary Kay Gallagher at May 5, 2006 9:52 PM

We moved to Ditmas from Sunset Park (blech!) and before that Greenpoint. We live in a co-op that we got for a great price, right off Cortelyou, and we love it. We don't own a car, and we find the amenities here just fine - it's easy to walk to the Co-op or any of the other shopping. The one thing I wish we had is a good gym or Y, but that's a very minor amenity. Sometimes I miss having multitudes of bars and cafes to choose from as we had on the Northside, but then I remember the giant underground oil spill, the numerous other neighborhood polluters, and the hordes of drunk out-of-towners along Bedford Avenue, and I breathe a sigh of relief. This area's not for everyone, but we really love it.

Posted by: LC at May 5, 2006 10:00 PM

Warren place:"It will sell easly, all it takes is a frustrated couple lokking for two bedroom apt in Manhattan. "
Well, This house is small like 2BDRM in Mahattan(same price).

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 10:33 PM

and Warren Place has parking, garden yard,very quiet and charm.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 5, 2006 11:03 PM

Thanks for your comments, Anon. 8:59. I do see how your location in Beverley Square would make a difference. Sounds fabulous.

Posted by: feelingdesperate at May 6, 2006 1:44 AM

You do have tranquility in the southern end of Vic. Flatbush, though and it's very picturesque and serene. I envy that sometimes. In the warm weather you get your walking in - no bad thing. Kids can ride bikes more safely down there. It took me about six months to make the transition to living here, and I was sometimes a little unsure. But that's all resolved now. How long have you lived here? If you're feeling uncertain, go out to Nyack or LI or Jersey for the day.... You'll feel a lot better about living in Flatbush, I bet. Look at the crime statistics, too.... It's not the 1950s out there anymore.

I think PPS (Albemarled and below - Church Ave. has it's own set of problems) will always be the crown jewel of flatbush, not just for the architecture but also the proximity to Cortelyou Road and the park. Caton park has it's troubles, but it's very close to the Park and not too far from Windsor Terrace amenities along PPS. I think it's kind of a sleeper for that reason. Having said all of this, however, southern nabes in Vic. Flatbush are flat out green and beautiful - some of the most beautiful vistas in Brooklyn. And many of the houses are larger than in the Beverley Squares. Also, Midwood Park in particularly is especially nice, as is Fiske Terrace. From what I have seen, not too much exterior renovations, which makes the area so picturesque, and also I have been in many homes out there still dripping with original detail.... cheer up, feeling desperate! Oh - I did hear of one family moving from a lovely house on Ave. H to a slighly less picturesque one in Bev. Square for the amenities, sense of community and she's happy she did. However, I think that's a little extreme. If you have children, bring them to Flatbush Athletics on Tuesday and Thursdays at the Parade Grounds. It's a great way to meet people in the neighborhood and feel less isolated. It's a great program, and the founder, Dave Herman, was recently honored for his work at the FDC annual banquet.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 6, 2006 10:22 AM

Brown Bomber,

Brilliant post regarding pricing in Bed Stuy. I agree with everything you said, and for the reasons you stated. That was a very realistic and astute accessment of the situation. Your lips to brokers'(and sellers')ears.

The best way for these neighborhoods to grow with a rising tide floats all boats kind of attitude, is not to foster pockets of ridiculous affluence amidst poverty, but a slow growth all across the board, including more programs that can help first time home buyers buy into reasonably priced housing. Bed Stuy is a neighborhood that has historically raised generations of families who now are finding their neighborhoods too expensive to buy into, for no other reason than it is now "hot".

While the special houses, such as the one that just sold on Stuy. Ave, will continue to sell for a million or over, the majority of houses in BS will not bring in that kind of money, and both realtors and sellers should not delude themselves into thinking they should.

Posted by: CrownHeightsProud at May 6, 2006 12:23 PM

Ok, either you\'re the real CHP or you\'re the troll. If you\'re the troll, then please go away and stop trolling this blog. If you\'re the real CHP, then please go away because you have absolutely, positively no credibility left here and you should never, ever lie to anyone else again. We are not going to forget what you did.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 6, 2006 2:58 PM

erm...

1) What did CHP do

and

2) What's with all the "you\'re" words. One typo is easy enough to slip by when typing something, but 4 times in a row looks like it was deliberate. So, what is that?

Posted by: webster at May 6, 2006 3:03 PM

She lied about having lived in Prospect Lefferts Gardens. Several people remembered it, and consequently she was "busted", to employ an overused expression.

As for the slashes, I don't know where they come from. They periodically appear in my posts even when they're not visible in the text as I'm typing it.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 6, 2006 4:06 PM

check out this two family in Windsor Terrace - need some work but it looks great - its 2 houses from mine so I would love to have great neighbors - check out the listing - address not posted - but it is 530 16th st - 2 car garage and one st from the park
http://doralny.com/agentcaster/view_listing.php?PHPSESSID=d26f594cb9ec5950fe3bf4c8eaa08942&ListingID=121

Posted by: William Sherr at May 6, 2006 6:44 PM

Webster- unfortunately we have a resident troll who is himslef the liar. If you want to see for yourself what CHP has posted you can check the archives and with Brownstoner. He can tell you the truth based in the ISP addresses. The troll has posted under a number of alias's and anon's. CHP never said anything of the sort and has always said she wanted to visit PLG. The others who "remembered" her "lying" all psoted from the same ISP address and so is the troll. Ignore him- he's nothing.

Posted by: PLG fan at May 6, 2006 7:46 PM

This troll seems to have it in for CHP, and harasses her everytime she posts. It has also posted under the names of BrownBomber,Ed,Bx2Bklyn,feeling puckish,babs, and even Brownstoner himself, as well as other many anons and several other names. If the topic is PLG, Bed Stuy, Crown Heights, or anything relevant to today's society, this troll tries to distrupt a civil discussion with false posts from the people who regularly comment on these topics. The best thing to do is ignore them, but every once in a while, someone needs to try to keep decent people's reputations unsullied. This post will probably cause the troll to react in some stupid way, under someone's name. Most of us know who's who.

Posted by: Juris Prudence at May 6, 2006 9:02 PM

Juris Prudence,

Your's is the best short explanation of this troll's behavior that I've read.

Posted by: Bob Marvin at May 6, 2006 9:51 PM

Webster, I didn\'t know I was going to elicit such a \"reaction\". Just hang around and watch what happens. That\'s all you have to do. You\'ll see who\'s lying. Trust your own judgment...you don\'t have to rely on anyone else to tell you what\'s what.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 6, 2006 9:51 PM

There are multiple trolls, and while they mix and match names they usually go by the names CrownHeightsProud, Bob Marvin, Ed, Bx2Bklyn, GardensGal, feeling puckish and a few others. Their MO is to bring up, in sort of a roundabout way, a mysterious troll who is out to do...well, something...interfere with their exercise of complete hegemony over this blog, I guess. I have no idea, to be honest. In any case, they usually fall all over themselves ranting about how persecuted they are, what an outrage it is, etc. until pretty much everyone reading the blog is bored to tears.

I cannot explain it. I have no explanation to offer. I simply wish it would go away.

Posted by: Matt at May 6, 2006 10:01 PM

Hegemony--LOL--there he goes again!

I, for one, am out of here for the balance of this thread.

Posted by: Bob Marvin at May 6, 2006 10:19 PM

PLG, I was one of the posters who remembered the comments made by Crownheightsproud. No one else could have posted from my IP address. I never got out of line. I have never harrassed anyone. I have told the truth about what I remember, period. And that is all I will do.

Posted by: Carlo at May 6, 2006 10:23 PM

Carlo- then maybe you need to go back and reread the posts because your memory is faulty AND Brownstoner has already stated that the multiple people who "remembered" were from the same ISP addressposter, so you are the only one who seems to honestly think you remember what CHP said. Before you go around libeling someone you better be able to prove it. Ask brownstoner if those other posts are or aren't from the same troll. If you won't even believe brownstoner, then that's your problem. But you owe CHP an apology- stop perpetuating a lie and destroying her credibility.

Posted by: PLG fan at May 7, 2006 1:46 AM

Matt and anon at 9:51 are the same person. Don't believe me, check with Brownstoner.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 1:48 AM

Stand your ground, Carlos. I also remember CHP saying that she lived in PLG at one time. She did say it. I don't know whether the record of her saying it is still around or whether it has been deleted and, frankly, I don't care. I know what I remember...and what several other remember, it seems. That darned good evidence. So no, Carlos, do not apologize for anything and thank you for telling the truth.

...and PLG, I don't know what you mean when you refer to multiple people. Given a choice between posting anonymously and choosing some made-up nickname for this blog, I choose to post anonymously because it's fewer keystrokes. That's the only way I've ever posted. I've never posted under more than one name. If anyone inferred that I was more than one person, that's their problem.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 8:56 AM

Actually, my theory is that Matt, anon at 9:51 and anon at 1:48 are all the same person.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 9:01 AM

I also remember hearing CHP say she lived in Lefferts. She definitely said it. She should own up to it and the rest of you should stop bullying a group of people who are simply telling the truth about something. If you don\'t believe us, fine; but stop going to such absurd lengths to shut us up. The truth will be told. The good news (I guess) is that you\'re free to pretend that the truth doesn\'t exist.

Posted by: Richard at May 7, 2006 9:29 AM

The problem with all of you people is that you spend more time posting than actually reading this blog! It was just about a week ago when CHP DID admit that she lied and DID apologize for doing it. So, I don\'t see how anyone could have a beef with her at this stage. There may be other things in contention, I don\'t know, but CHP has owned up to her part in this.

Posted by: For the Record at May 7, 2006 9:44 AM

PLG fan, drop it, you're pissing into the wind. Everytime you keep going, the troll comes back under several names, agrees with you, disagrees with you, disagrees with itself, and comtinues to slander CHP, Bx2Bklyn, and anyone else who bothers to respond.

What a waste of space and time. What does any of this have to do with the open houses? With the exception of you, Bob and Juris Prudence, I would bet ALL of the other posts regarding this stupid CHP thing are the same person.

Let it go, then maybe people can talk about the houses.

Posted by: Bunky at May 7, 2006 10:21 AM

Well then, PLG Nazi...er, fan...where is that proof you keep talking about? Please give it to us. We want to see it.

If anyone is a troll here, it is YOU.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 10:24 AM

The fact is, CHP did make a post in which she admitted lying. She accepted responsibility for it. So, it seems to me there is little to argue about now. Time to move on.

Posted by: Katie at May 7, 2006 10:44 AM

Wrong, Katie Troll.

I never "confessed" to something I never did in the first place. That "confession", you, and most of the rest of the last 20 posts, as well as the whole accusation in the first place, are all the work of you and your sick friends, or maybe just all you with some high tech software allowing you to avoid being blocked.

If you spent half the time you spend on your schizoprenic multiple postings, working on something useful to society and not spewing venom and discord, you might actually have a life, a purpose, and maybe some friends, other than the ones you make up to back up your childish and infantile points.

Since you are so predictable, I'm sure you will respond in the same predictable way, saying I "lied", making up new people to back you up, or even posting as other regulars, or myself. Go ahead, knock yourself out. I'm not going to play anymore today.

I've been watching this thread deteriorate, so I may as well add my post to those who have defended me. (Thank you all) Regular readers of this blog know I didn't lie about anything, and frankly, I'm sure no one cares. I'm looking forward to the day that you get bored with tormenting me and you crawl off somewhere else.

It's a beautiful day today, and I'm going to go out and enjoy it, and the days to come. I will continue to post here under my name, and you haven't won. You are no more than a minor postule, a small oozing putresence, a zit, on the face of life, and therefore irrelevant and forgetable.

Have a lovely day.

Posted by: CrownHeightsProud at May 7, 2006 11:10 AM

It is happening again. That was not me at 11:10 but someone--or should I say some troll--impersonating me. I have nothing more to add to this discussion. I spoke my piece and have moved on. If the troll attempts to coopt my identity I will occasionally pipe up, just to let you all know the the real me is still around. Otherwise, I have had enough and have too many more valuable uses for my time.

Posted by: CrownHeightsProud at May 7, 2006 11:45 AM

Well Bx2Bklyn, you certainly jumped the gun on that one! LOL!!!

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 12:13 PM

Everyone, that was not me at 1:54. That was the troll again.

Troll, please find some other blog to be a pest at.

Posted by: Bx2Bklyn at May 7, 2006 2:15 PM

Brownstoner, help us!!!!

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 2:26 PM

Mr. B, if you look at the posts above, I think you will find that PLG fan = Bx2Bkln. Would you check on this for us? I really think this person is posting under multiple names in order to confuse readers.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 2:31 PM

Thanks Mr. B!!!!

Please let us know if you saw anything noteworthy on the FG tour.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 3:01 PM

Yes, thank you Mr. B, but what a PITA for you that you have to go to all this trouble.

Posted by: Bob Marvin at May 7, 2006 3:05 PM

Looks like we deleted the real Bx2B rather than the imposter. Guess we're going to have to start requiring log-ins which is a pity. It's a good thing we don't have anything else to do but police and delete comments!

Posted by: Brownstoner at May 7, 2006 7:16 PM

Actually, it looks to me like you deleted the right material. The posts by the person who was masquerading under multiple names (Bx2Bklyn and PLG Fan) disappeared. I went back and checked on this. So, you did nothing wrong. This practice of posting under multiple names has got to stop as it is really ruining the experience for other people who are interested in Brooklyn and real estate.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 9:03 PM

I had a feeling that a lot of this weird business with identity stealing and shifting was being done by one of the established regulars here. It looks like I was right!

Mr. B, don't give yourself a hard time about this. It wasn't your fault. We make our beds and then have to lay in them! I have the sneaking suspicion that things are really going to settle down now on this board.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 9:15 PM

I'm sorry that we have all the static to wade through, because I'd love to discuss the open houses.

I went to the one on Rugby Road house, and wasn't overly impressed. It's roomy, but needs a lot of cosmetics. And perhaps it needs more work that surface? I wasn't sure about the outside paint job and the roof (which can be pricey with these old Victorians). Any one else have any comments? Imo it's overpriced for its condition and the location (it's next to Avenue H). I would have thought that $875K would be a fair price, but what do I know in this crazy market. I will be interested to see what it sells for.

Posted by: Turtle at May 7, 2006 9:39 PM

I walk by the Rugby Road house quite frequently. To me, viewing it from the outside, it appears to be in excellent shape. At the very least it looks well-maintained. I doubt that there are any serious structural repairs needed, and the roof doesn't look very old. I think the prices is reasonable--in fact, I'd even say very reasonable relative to what you'd get in some other nabes.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 10:43 PM

Definitely reasonable compared to other neighborhoods, but wow prices in Ditmas area have risen quickly! Two years ago this house would have been $600K.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 7, 2006 11:06 PM

Went to an open house at 735 Rugby, just up the block from 777. Something to consider in this area is that it is becoming more heavily Orthodox. They like to live close to Avenue J, where they do much of their shopping. Certainly not an issue per se, but they definitely keep to themselves and if one is worried about being isolated, this would only contribute to that.

Posted by: west at May 8, 2006 8:11 AM

I've lived in Brooklyn for only a couple of years and now live in Ditmas Park West, not far from the 700 block of Rugby. I have this feeling that, if you nicely reached out to some of these orthodox families, they'd reciprocate and be very good neighbors. In fact, there's an orthodox family right across the street from me and I intend to give it a shot. Now that the weather is warm and they're occasionally out in their yard, I'll go over and say hello since I've never really met them. I'm sure they want to be friends with their neighbors just as much as anyone else does. Am I being somehow "naive"?

Posted by: Anonymous at May 8, 2006 9:06 AM

Thank you Mr. B- I apologize for the situation and for the trouble caused to B2B. Seems you just can't get rid of the blog troll and it is next to impossible to know who is and who isn't. I'll keep reading the blog but for the record I will not be posting again. Any further posts under my name are not coming from me but from the troll.

Posted by: PLG fan at May 8, 2006 9:37 AM

Can't we stay on topic...just this once...please?

Posted by: Anonymous at May 8, 2006 9:52 AM

anon 9:06-
You are't naive and I think you will find that indeed they do want to be good neighbors. YOu will need to accomodate certain aspects of their beliefs but in general they can be very warm and welcoming despite what you hear.

Posted by: Bx2Bklyn at May 8, 2006 9:57 AM

Crap. Just when things start to get interesting and legit again, Bx2Bklyn resurfaces to resume her trolling. That's probably her posting as "anonymous" as well. I suspect she is asking the questions, answering them, disagreeing with her own answers and doing anything she has to do to upset someone...anyone.

Posted by: Uve at May 8, 2006 10:33 AM

No- that would be you, Uve. But thanks for making it a misery to participate in the blog- not just for me, but for everyone. I'm done.

Posted by: Bx2Bklyn at May 8, 2006 11:55 AM

feelingdesperate must be living in a different Ditmas Park then the area between BSW and DPW that I live in.

- I Don't have a car and it's a short walk to grocery store, the co-op (which delivers). I'm a few blocks from the Q train at Cortelyou and a brisk walk or bus ride to the F train (been using F train on weekends during the Q train construction work).
- It's not peaceful, or quiet, or clean ? It's very peaceful where I am. Wasn't the subway was there where you picked the house? If the subway noise bothers you, you shouldn't have picked a house so close.
- No restaurants? Then what have I been eating at on Cortelyou or down by Ditmas, they sure seem like restaurants.
- No activity on the street? The commercial streets are always busy when I walk thru, day or night. And the residential streets are wonderfully serene and peaceful. I would not want much "activity" on the pastoral tree lined residential blocks.
- Neighbors particularly chummy? What are you sitting around waiting for them to bring you a basket of homemade jam and scratch baked bread ? Did you go to the Arbor Day tree planting? Everyone was chummy there. Get out there and say hello to your neighbors, introduce yourself.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 8, 2006 12:37 PM

I posted earlier, to say that I think there is a big difference between living in the Northern vs. Southern ends of Victorian Flatbush, in terms of suburban anomie. Newkirk needs a Cortelyou style revitalization for that to change. However, it is damn pretty down there, not to mention tranquil... I didn't want to live the subway line, so excluded houses on the tracks from my search. However, I know people who don't mind the noise and they saved I would say $200K on the price of their house. For some people, it's a good deal.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 8, 2006 1:20 PM

I don't mean to diss the neighborhood, I was responding to someone's query about why someone wouldn't want to come here. You certainly can get so much more for your money here, and the trees and gardens and houses are gorgeous. I agree entirely.

That said, I live near Newkirk Ave., next to the subway, and it's not quiet or clean here. Certainly I can walk to C-Town or Associated with my cart (and I do), but most people I know drive to Shoprite or the PS Food Coop to save money. Picket Fence is great, but it is too expensive for my budget.

Your description of pastoral Ditmas Park sounds wonderful! I'm glad you have such a great block.

Anon 1:20 pm has it on the nose -- the difference between the north and south end of Victorian Flatbush. I also agree --- Fiske Terrace is amazingly gorgeous, I walk around there whenever I can.

Posted by: feelingdesperate at May 9, 2006 8:34 PM

Just had to join in to this older posting. W.Midwood is where we live and we find it better than the nabes closer to Prospect Park. Less crime, amazingly friendly and diverse community, huge houses. I'm friendly with an ultra-orthodox family on our street, as well as the heavily tatooed single guy. Everyonen is welcome. We also find that between Cortelyou Rd, Newkirk Plaza, Avenue J, and Coney Island Ave, there's no lack of great food. Italian, Mexican, sushi, American, coffee shop, Lebanese, one of the best and most famous pizzerias in NYC, etc etc etc. Apparently the crime in PPS is much much higher than in the areas further south. And there are wayyyy more young families with children closer to Ave. H. Not only that, but 2 new stores opening on Ave. H, a family-friendly athletics center with kickboxing, yoga, karate, movement for kids, etc. And a children's store, both due to open this summer!!! We love the 'hood and my husband who works on Wall Street rides his bike to work in 25 minutes flat. Or a 10 minute car ride through the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel if we're out at night. So much better than the Slope. Plus a quick Q train to BAM for art house cinema and a beer!

Posted by: tinmouse10 at June 29, 2006 1:39 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions