« Outlaw Diners At Waterfront Warehouse Don't You Want to Just Hug Him? »

May 18, 2006

Did You Hear? Red Hook Is Hot!

red hookThe Post breaks the news today that, yawn, Red Hook is no longer a barren, industrial wasteland. Buried in such earth-shattering headlines, though, are some real estate factoids which, while not big news, are worth taking a quick look at:

Property is going for between $600 and $700 per square foot, brokers say. Condos range anywhere from $550,000 to $850,000; houses are $850,000 to $1.5 million. This is a huge jump from the $450 to $550 per-square-foot prices two years ago.

The story's star though has to be Red Hook native Gino Vitali, 32, who's been riding the Red Hook real estate boom since he was old enough to drink: "I've been buying [property] here since I was 21," he says. "I bought my first building for $70,000; it was a corner building, four-family. I sold it for $1.8 million eight months ago."
Welcome [NY Post]




Comments

We just moved to Tiffany Place and talked to a waiter at Alma a few weeks back. He said there was talk of removing the Port there a few years ago. Anyone know if this is still likely? It'd be nice to walk down by Columbia Street and have something other than construction to look at.

Posted by: cobblestoner at May 18, 2006 10:58 AM

yawn

Posted by: Anonymous at May 18, 2006 11:15 AM

I read that the lease for the four piers right off Columbia (just west of Tiffany and up to Atlantic) expires in the next 12 months and will not be renewed. So, I assume waterfront park with some luxury apts like Bklyn Heights? Let the debate begin...

Posted by: Anonymous at May 18, 2006 11:47 AM

Be careful what you wish for.

The logical and predictable argument of any developer would be to push for a row of several 40-story condo towers on the water, like what's going on in Long Island City or what went on along Trump's West Side or other such swaths that suddenly become available.

When this happens, the land isn't really "opened up to the public" so much as opened up to massive development that blocks out harbor/city views for the entire rest of the surrounding neighborhoods.

Sometimes a low-profile working pier is better than an overdeveloped Miami-style colony of towers that ruin it for the everyone else around.

And you know the developers will say it's gotta be this way or no way at all "just to be able to afford to do it." Hah.

Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if there is an effort to make this Atlantic-to-Degraw waterfront stretch the unfortunate dumping grounds of all the residential towers everyone's complaining about for the new park plan.

This may pan out to be an interesting, extremely local NIMBY battle.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 18, 2006 12:04 PM

I agree, it is going to be VERY interesting to see how it all plays out. Just to clarify, I wasn't implying that it is necessarily good that the pier lease is expiring. We don't have any say in the matter. Just that it is happening. And you are right, it's anyone's guess what will happen with that land. Scary.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 18, 2006 12:14 PM

okay - anybody actually paying $600 - $700 psf in Red Hook like Corcoran says? You can pay that for Boerum Hill.

Posted by: chuck at May 18, 2006 12:37 PM

Anon 12:14p and 11:47a,

12:04p was me, thought I had my name in, but posted before making sure.

Yeah, the "be careful what you wish for" etc. was directed to the original poster (cobblestoner).

I am right with you regarding your posts, read similar things in local papers.

And as for cobblestoner, welcome to the neighborhood. Note that apple muffins (and so many other baked goodies) at Margaret Palca's rock. But I won't bore all here with other neighborhood minutia, just welcome.

Chuck, re: $600-$700psf for Red Hook properties, I tend to agree. No idea what is happening with Imlay down there, and ongoing word about Red Hook Stores apartments above fairway seems to point to rentals, so I just don't see a major bastion of high-end luxury apartments and/or other properties present that can yank $/sqft up so high, especially as much of the real estate down stock there (a limited extremely few properties aside) tends to have either new renovations with very cheap finishes or homes that are in utterly bad shape.

Your comparison with Boerum Hill is interesting.

One thing I have noted is that people really do have a huge problem with not being 3 or 4 blocks from a subway.

The issue is non-existent for me. I am used to taking the b61 to the subway, or walking 10 minutes from my present location across to Bergen or Carroll Street F stations.

But I must say, it is considered a HUGE issue for everyone else my wife and I have encountered when visiting us -- "oh, I could never live out here" and when discussiong properties for sale in the area, "no way I'd pay that much to live so far away" referring to Tiffany Place as if it is in the remote wilds.

Oddly enough, I have a good friend who lives near the corner of Atlantic and Clinton, who is extremely athletic, had a bike he uses alot etc, and he was utterly nonplussed about the Fairway opening, saying "so what, i just wouldn't want to have to go all the way down there."

His loss. Silly, since ~1 mile south on a bike is nothing. But there is something very significant to most people about being so far away from the subway, be it on Tiffany Place or especially all the way down in Red Hook (which I love and spend alot of time in, personally).

Anyhow, to each his own.

I get the sense that major primary movers like Imlay and other large high-$psf factors would have to present themselves to support any chase up in price to even Boerum Hill levels, let alone some Cobble Hill pricing levels that some new developments are thinking of charging (down in Red Hook).

I am quite a bit surprised that Red Hook's pricing catch-up (given that everyone has known Fairway etd were coming) has now lead to new properties trying to push the limits of outpricing other more central neighborhoods.

And this comes from a person who loves Red Hook.

Aaaanyhow...

Posted by: webster at May 18, 2006 1:18 PM

Folks, chew on this, it's a 69 page study of piers 6-12. I have been worried about what will go here for some time. This study is 3 years old, and caused quite a stink at 1 point, because the city pad $500k to do it, then decided to scrap the plans and not release it to the public. An outcry ensued and the report was released, but pretty much with the disclaimer that some of the specific ideas would not be considered. That said, it's very much worth a read.

http://www.panynj.gov/commerce/Pub-meeting-5-22-1a.pdf

Posted by: anon at May 18, 2006 1:58 PM

Webster,

You consider Tiffany Place Red Hook? You won't once you have kids.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 18, 2006 4:21 PM

Tiffany Place is a funky area because it's right on the border of Cobble Hill and Red Hook. My broker told me it was Cobble Hill, but I've read elsewhere it's Red Hook. My favorite was a post here a few weeks ago that called it "Cobble Hill West." Either way, I think we get the best of all areas and being on the west side of the street gives us a nice unobstructed view of the skyline. Like Webster @ 12:04 said, sometimes I guess it is nice to have that low pier compared to high rises.

Posted by: cobblestoner at May 18, 2006 4:45 PM

i think the area around tiffany place and columbia street north of hamilton ave. is called "carroll gardens west" or "columbia street waterfront". both are rather new hybrids because no one really knows what to call it. It used to be part of Red Hook before the bqe and the tunnel divided them, but i don't consider that area red hook.

Posted by: redhookrising at May 18, 2006 5:23 PM

it's all redhook -- would be ok at a substantial discount to other neighborhoods, but recently, you don't really see that. If the bubble ever bursts, watch out redhook.

Posted by: anon at May 18, 2006 5:47 PM

hey i paid $140 sq ft for my place in red hook. whoooo hoooooo. go me!

the current prices are stupid.
why buy a condo for $700k when you can still buy a 3 fam all new (albeit crappy) construction for $800.

whatev. i'm going shopping at fairway in my granny cart! eat my dust!

Posted by: braggart at May 18, 2006 5:56 PM

Article as usual is misleading - but par for course when media does real estate journalism. Just quote the brokers - a real reliable and honest no-spin source.
No way that guy sold for $1.8 in Red Hook - as most people refer to Red Hood and as article implies - south of BBTunnel.
Everything used to be called Red Hook - all of Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill. But north of tunnel isn't the Fairway, warehouse, rough-and-tumble RedHook that is the brunt of the new press coverage.
I mean, for real, $600-$700 sq ft that Carroll Gardens not Pioneer St.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 18, 2006 6:16 PM

Anonymous 4:21p,

I never said that I considered Tiffany Place as Red Hook. Read my post more closely.

What I said was that my experience regarding living on Tiffany Place for a number of years has been that people think it is too far from trains etc, and therefore for many of them the idea of Red Hook (the next neighborhood down extending another mile south, starting at the tunnel) is wayyyyy too far.

My apologies if that was unclear.

However, come to think of it, in the sense of old maps, the waterfront below Atlantic Ave has been called Red Hook for a long time, although it is considered "Cobble Hill West" (or Carroll Gardens West" below Sackett) by brokers in recent years, or just Columbia Street Waterfront District.

For these reasons, the port sign at Atlantic and Columbia Street specifically calls it "Red Hook Terminal."

So, whatever. I just like where I live, (and Red Hook too) and could care less what some folks want to quibble over, in terms of names.

Just commenting about the present media hype, and then the reality of what most visitors / prospective buyers say about Tiffany Place (which is likely to be more the case for the further removed Red Hook neighborhood), based on 6 separate cases of identical results in terms of majority of feedback from 6 separate friends' apartment open houses / sales processes here on Tiffany Place.

You can only imagine this must be doubly the case for the "masses" that similarly rush to Red Hook properties for showings, only to get out there and spout feedback that it's just way too far out for them.

And for the record, I already have kids, well aware of what that means for Tiffany Place (less expensive nice back door into PS 29 zone). That was a major reason why I picked Tiffany Place and not something like President or Summit or other streets down here.

So yeah, well aware of that for a long time now.

Posted by: webster at May 18, 2006 8:32 PM

I agree with webster about the perception that Tiffany is too far from the subway. One thing I wonder, however, is whether or not that whole area is protected like Cobble Hill is. That definitely is a nice advantage to buying a building west of the BQE. You can tear it down and rebuild it without having to worry about preservation like you would in the surrounding neighborhoods. I walk 20 minutes to the Bourough Hall subway every day for work. It's actually kind of nice and relaxing if you ask me, and the proximity to PS 29 is definitely great if you have kids. I have a coworker who owns a brownstone on Thompkins and always takes the bus to Bourough Hall. That's just lazy :)

Posted by: cobblestoner at May 19, 2006 10:42 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions