« On Scarano, Mezzanine-Gate & DOB Mystery Building: "13" Marks the Spot »
April 25, 2006
Is Big Brother Really Preventing Crime?
We drove through Bed Stuy and East New York on Saturday on our way to Bracci Fences (more on that later) and noticed, for the first time, some of the NYPD surveillance cameras we've been hearing so much about that can pan,tilt and zoom, all the while uploading feeds through the Internet to police HQ. In particular, there were a ton of them along Utica Avenue, including this one at Lincoln Place. The Times questioned how effective the cameras are as a deterent, and the views were mixed, with the benefits appearing to be mostly psychological. We liked the self-preservation sales pitch from one security consultant: "If I put a camera in my store and the mugger goes to the store next door, that's a win for me."
The Camera Never Blinks [NY Times] GMAP
Comments
I love it!! Bravo NYPD!!! I eagerly await their arrival all along Myrtle, Fulton, Putnam and Classon in FG/CH/BS. It's about public safety and I'm ecstatic that the city is taking this much needed measure. I'm sure the civil libertarians will be up in arms but I hope they focus their efforts on another battle that is more closely aligned with public opinion. Presumably, most law abiding citizens would not mind sacrificing some privacy for some extra safety. However, if you're privacy zealot, a criminal or someone who shares the belief that crime is a necessary form of income redistribution, then you're probably against it.
I know, simplistic analysis (partly tongue in cheek)! But I bet if you poll the residents of high crime areas, most of which are minority communities, they will overwhelmingly be in support of the program since they are more often then not the victims of crime.
Posted by: BrownBomber at April 25, 2006 11:49 AM
I'm all for this, too. Try reading the latest posts on the Crown Heights boards of brooklynian.com (formerly dailyheights) and you'll see how much these measures are needed.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 12:39 PM
this is in crown heights, not bed stuy.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 1:07 PM
I support this measure wholeheartedly. I'm sitting on tons of money and other property and I intend to continue sitting on it. If some hungry SOB comes along wanting to feed his kids at my expense, I expect the cops to blow his head clean off.
Posted by: About time! at April 25, 2006 1:08 PM
gee, About time!
maybe you should move out of crown heights (if anon 01:07 is correct).
i am glad this is happening for the obvious reasons, however i fear it equally...1984 keeps coming to mind. eek!
Posted by: newyorker at April 25, 2006 1:25 PM
About time!,
you pretty much naailed it, if by "feed" you mean "shoot heroin into" and "kids" you mean "veins."
I mean, what is this country coming to when the police try to prevent crimes rather than encourage this much-needed system of wealth redistribution?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 1:25 PM
You guys are all crazy. This is the government watching you, keeping tabs of where you go and who you visit. If we allow this to go ahead, there could be cameras everywhere. 1984, anyone? Is this a world you really want to live in?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 1:35 PM
I don't care whether they're feeding kids or buying drugs. It doesn't matter. Why doesn't it matter? Because what's mine is mine and what's mine is not theirs! If they try to poke their greedy hands into my cookie jar for ANY reason, I expect the police to execute them with EXTREME prejudice. It's about time we start teaching these people about property rights.
Posted by: About time! at April 25, 2006 1:36 PM
No, it's about ending freedom of association.
"ENDING FREEDOM"
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 1:42 PM
Why does the police trying to CATCH criminals (who would then get due process of law) equal summary executions? This is not about the invasion of privacy, it's the surveillance of public areas. These cameras can't see anything a beat cop couldn't.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 1:51 PM
Even I'm for it, but we need to be realistic in knowing that it may help the police catch criminals after the fact, ala the bombers in London, but it won't help to stop you from getting mugged, as no one is actually watching you 24/7. I guess as long as the crooks don't know that, it may deter a few crimes. If they could make the cameras visibly sweep an area so it looks like someone is actually watching, that would be a more real deterrent.
I do know there are Big Brother issues and abuses that will arise, and I may modify my opinion when that happens, but in the meantime, I'm for it.
Posted by: Crown HeightsProud at April 25, 2006 1:57 PM
Re: "These cameras can't see anything a beat cop couldn't."
Yes they can, because they can easily be connected to face recognition software. With this software they can track EVERYBODY'S every move. A typical beat cop can't do this.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 1:59 PM
panopticon anyone?
Posted by: clinton hillbilly at April 25, 2006 2:00 PM
"Dead or alive, you're coming with me." -Robocop
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:07 PM
I guess I'd be more comfortable with this technology if its advocates weren't so comfortable with killing people (even in jest). And no, I don't think a property crime justifies execution. It does amaze me that in the four years that I have lived on Putnam near Grand (aka open crack market) that I have only seen two arrests. It would seem a more effective approach would be to seize the bodega at the corner for facilitating the crimes. How much does this video system cost? How many arrests are made? What are the outcome of the arrests? The people you are going to see on the street are very low-level dealers and their customers. Not only are they unlikely to really change their behavior because of a box on a light pole (moving to the next block doesn't solve a problem), when they are arrested they aren't offered drug treatment.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:08 PM
"they can easily be connected to face recognition software. With this software they can track EVERYBODY'S every move. A typical beat cop can't do this...."
And if that ability is used to violate people's rights, say monitoring citizens' political activities, etc., then it's probably unconstitutional and should be challenged--exactly as if it were a beat cop doing it. But it's the ABUSE of the technology that may violate rights, not the mere existence of the technology. Just as with any other law-enforcement tactic and tool.
Honestly, to read post like About Time!'s, you'd think that the state had an obligation to give criminals a fair chance to get away with crimes.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:11 PM
"I guess I'd be more comfortable with this technology if its advocates weren't so comfortable with killing people (even in jest)...."
I'm guessing you flunked Sarcasm 101. The poster advocating killing people is clearly opposed to the technology.
So does that mean we should all support it, because its opponents are so comfortable with killing people (even in jest)?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:15 PM
They already unconstitutionally monitor citizen's political activities all the time. Do not give them another tool to do this!
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:17 PM
Get away my ass! These people have to be taught about property rights. Their parents don't teach them anything, mostly because they're drug addicts who don't love their children. Consequently the kids grow up never having learned that they are to do absolutely, positively nothing to diminish my wealth! I can tell you that I'm tired of it. I only wish that these cameras were accompanied by a few machine gun nests because my property has to be protected against all of those dirty have-nots out there!
Posted by: About time! at April 25, 2006 2:18 PM
I add the last part because "quality of life" crimes respond more, it seems to me, to interventions in the lives of the miscreants, and also to community involvement. People need to engage people to change behavior. A beat cop does to have "facially recognition technology" - it is called her brain. She recognizes "Leon" or "Sheila" and knows they are up to know good. She knows when a store is open etc. A video camera is a very expensive scarecrow, while a beat cop is, at best, an attentive farmer. Now as a public defender I realize that cops are often not at their best and may invent observations and arrest people to meet quotas or because they don't like them.
Recently I engaged a lady of evening asking her to move on. It ended up in a confrontation, and I know why I don't do it all the time. But if everyone on the block made it clear they know what is going on and don't like it, it would have an effect. Of course it can be scary to engage personally with people in that way. A block watch is really the way to go, but I am not sure people are ready for it yet.
Posted by: putnam-denizen at April 25, 2006 2:21 PM
Since when is catching a few petty criminals more important than OUR RIGHTS? Wake up, people!
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:22 PM
Yeah, the city is so desperate to bring in the jackboots to protect rich people that they're putting up cameras... in East New York. You know, where all the billionaires live, in fear that the underclass will someday rise up and storm their mansions in righteous anger.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:25 PM
These cameras with facial recognition software could track everyone's every move. Show me a beat cop, or even a network of beat cops that can do that!
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:27 PM
please synopsisize 1984...
anyone feel like crime is going up?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2006 2:27 PM
Re sarcasm miss - you are right, I missed it. But then I think that sarcasm doesn't really work all that well on the internet, nor is it all that funny. I guess it all depends on why people read and post. I try to assume that most people are actually interested in the subject and not just trying to be cute. But hey, that's just me!
Posted by: putnam-denizen at April 25, 2006 2:27 PM
CHP - actually such methods (video) can prevent crime because the guy who will mug you tomorrow is the same guy who mugged me today and who may be caught and/or convicted by the evidence such cameras provide.
Not to mention the benefit it may provide the falsely accussed defendant who may be able to exculpate himself by this evidence.
Posted by: David at April 25, 2006 2:47 PM
02:25 PM, you're missing the boat. There's some nice real estate in East New York. So, first we're gonna make the streets safe. Then, once they're safe, we're gonna sell them to white people. The current residents can go someplace where the real estate is less desirable, and everyone can live happily ever after.
Posted by: Anon at April 25, 2006 2:58 PM
SO anyway, what about Bracci Fences?
Posted by: pk at April 25, 2006 9:03 PM
Anon, aka "Paranoid Civil Libertarian Freak/Whack Job", please cut the BS! When public safety is at risk, most New Yorkers couldn't care less about gov't monitoring, Big Brother or 1984. For the most part, New Yorkers are law abiding and thus have nothing to hide. Lose the inflated sense of self-importance. Like the rest of us, you're a damn nobody and Uncle Sam doesn't give a rat's ass about you, let alone what you're doing in public spaces.
As for me, I'm not afraid of our gov't but I am afraid of having my children abducted or some asshole putting a 357 magnum to my head and blowing my head off simply because he wants my car, watch or money. Are you going to break the awful news to my wife and children and tell them that their husband and father won't be coming home today but "his privacy was protected to the very end"? Criminals belong behind bars and not on the streets. If surveillance cameras make this more possible than not then I'm strongly in favor of the measure, albeit somewhat "intrusive". My inalienable right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" trumps a criminal's right to roam the street undetected, with impunity and free to victimize honest hardworking folks. And to echo a previous poster's comment, don't forget the pivotal role that cameras played in the terrorist bombing cases in London and Madrid.
Posted by: BrownBomber at April 25, 2006 9:21 PM
I hope it's a while before Brownbomber takes it upon himself to explode another bomb of self-righteousness. With the Bush administration tapping our phones and generally running amuck, you'd better lose your smug mindset of "it's gonna be okay, nothing like that could ever happen here".
Isn't there a line in an old James Brown song about how, when some of us see a little success, they forget about the rest of us?
Posted by: Anon at April 25, 2006 10:35 PM
No Anon, you don't understand. Because Brownbomber has money, his kids and his family are more 'valuable' than ours. And what the hell does he care about our civil liberties? When the law no longer protects our civil liberties, he'll still have his money to protect his.
Posted by: Douglas at April 25, 2006 10:40 PM
Do you think half the police department should be holed up in headquarters somewhere watching the video screen? Or out in the street doing their job?
Whoever posted about the corner of Grand and Putnam, that corner has been a problem at least as long as I have lived in this neighborhood (17 yrs). Wouldn't it be more cost-efficient to just keep a cop on the corner?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 26, 2006 7:22 AM
Who said anything about cops being holed up in a room watching video screens? Ever heard of computer hardware/software and recorded video tapes and discs. Further, who ever said that beat cops and cameras are mutually exclusive? Can't they be used jointly? Who's going to pay to put a cop on every corner 24/7 and do we even have enough police officers? Are we simply dealing with fantasy here?
And why the big fuss over being subject to monitoring devices? Almost every single school, office building (public or private) and place of business in New York City relies on video camera surveillance as a security tool. This is nothing new. The gov't is not putting cameras into our homes!
Further, the city has installed traffic cameras at numerous intersections in New York to capture red light violators. So are you telling me that it's okay for the city to install cameras to raise revenue but it's not okay to install cameras to protect taxpayers from street crime?
Camera surveillance is merely a complementary tool that will ASSIST law enforcement in doing a MORE effective job. Why? Because (a) its a deterrent and (b) in the event that something terrible happens it will provide evidence which can be used to arrest and prosecute the perp.
"You guys are all crazy. This is the government watching you, keeping tabs of where you go and who you visit. If we allow this to go ahead, there could be cameras everywhere. 1984, anyone? Is this a world you really want to live in?"
You must love Bush because given your desperate and exclusive reliance on scare tactics you are clearly a student of the game. Perhaps you learned at the master's feet?
I highly suggest that some of you critics descend from your ivory towers and take an "academic" stroll to some of the tougher parts of Brooklyn at night and let's see if you're singing the same tune after spending the night in the ICU at Kings County Hospital. Then you'd have some good old fashioned practical experience to help shape your position. If you're too frighten to do that, and I bet that you are, you should read some of the horror stories about crime in Brooklyn at www.brooklynian.com. I can employ scare tactics too! LOL!
I'm sorry to say it but SOME of you liberals disgust me, i.e., no death penalty; no three strikes and you're out rule; no mandatory sentences; no stiffer penalty for gang related crimes, etc. Though I admire your commitment on social issues, you're just too soft on crime and out of sync with the American mainstream. A pity...
Posted by: BrownBomber at April 26, 2006 1:30 PM
Yes, Browntraitor--err, bomber--you can employ scare tactics, and you might as well because logic certainly isn't on your side. If you want to make some of those scary nabes less scary, then address some of the social inequities that are the ultimate SOURCE of the crime. Otherwise you're just going to be moving the 'scary' nabes around, like peas in a shell game. But maybe that's fine with you, since you'll always have enough money to live in a nice place and avoid the 'peas'. That's just great for you. What makes me want to vomit about African Americans who 'make it' is that they immediately lose sight of their people, the ongoing struggle and the ultimate goal of equality and justice in America.
Oh, that's right, it was James Brown who sang, "When some of them make money, they forget about our people."
Posted by: Anonymous at April 26, 2006 1:59 PM
Why am I a traitor? Is it because I'm African-American and I don't identify, pity nor support the criminal element in our community or have compassion for the multitude of us who despite having a world of opportunity before us would rather engage in anti-social, pathological behavior that borders on self-annihilation? Is that really your argument? Is this acceptance some basic requirement to being "black"? Is this why we show such high tolerance for crime in our communities despite the fact that the streets are flowing with the blood of our men and women and so many of us are incarcerated in state and federal penitentiaries? Is this what is meant by "keeping it real"?
Well then it's obvious that I have a higher opinion of our people then you do. Why do we feel the necessity to lower the bar at every opportunity for black folks but then expect everyone to treat us as equal? You can't have it both ways. Given our station in American society (at the rock bottom) we should be doing the exact opposite by raising the bar and not lowering our standards, expectations and goals.
And for your information, I don't think that I'm exceptional because I'm not full of myself. To the contrary, I'm quite average. Perhaps you think you are exceptional thus the low expectations that you have for our people. If anything you're the traitor, not me. You and the other race baiters are leading poor black folks on a wild goose chase that will not produce the results they so desperately seek. Perhaps you are benefiting from a cottage industry that incapacitate black folks while at the same time aims to deliver them from poverty and disenfranchisement. I don't know. What I do know is that it's about time that we start telling poor black folks the truth. There is no grand master white puppeteer manipulating black lives and entrenching them in a life of poverty, hopelessness and despair. That is a outright lie concocted to assuage the guilt of liberal whites and placate scapegoating blacks who need an explanation, other than themselves, for their miserable plight. Why not tell them the truth? Why not tell them that the only way for us to get ahead is through education, hard work, industry, respecting the rule of law, promoting a strong black family and instilling proper values into our children. There is no short cut, no hand out and certainly no quick solution. You seem educated, Anon. You know the truth but you don't share it with thouse who need it the most. You know that we cannot rely on the government or the benevolence of others to solve our problems yet people like you insist on telling them otherwise. Why?
White folks are not our enemy. They have enough problems of their own and are quite frankly more concerned with their own families, jobs and lives then with "holding the black man down." Don't kid yourself, we are not a threat to them. We're not even on the radar. The mental slavery that currently afflicts us is home grown and you are simply a perpetuating agent.
Anon, I'm happy that I'm not like you. I don't make excuses for the worst of us simply to feel better about myself. In life, you get what you put in. Period. I don't give whites credit for my success and I certainly don't blame them for my failures. All I can do is work hard to support my family, respect, love and support my wife, raise my children with solid family values and be a positive influence in my community. If all of us stressed the same then black people would be far better off today.
Now I don't deny the historical truths of slavery, racism and discrimination in this country. It was ugly and remains ugly to this very day. However, the black family, black culture and black community is imploding from within and we are doing more damage to ourselves today then racism could had ever inflicted.
Yes, it's indeed hard for many but what are we supposed to do? Roll over and die? Where's the fighting spirit that help abolish slavery, squash Jim Crow, and later produced the Civil Rights Movement and some of our greatest leaders? We are a people born of Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglas, Sojourner Truth, Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, etc. Yet we are not giving ourselves a fighting chance today. I ask you, is it possible to lower our standards any further? No one is turning their back on black America but perahps we are turning our back on ourselves.
So Anon, please don't ever call me a traitor again. You don't know me. I have more love for black folks then you could ever comprehend.....
Posted by: BrownBomber at April 26, 2006 5:10 PM
Well said Brownbomber. I know you are not looking for my opinion on this, and it probably won't help you as I am white. I don't agree with a lot of the things you say on this site generally, you clearly are more politically conservative than me, however, I agree with the points you made above. One thing that is essential in any society is for bad behavior to be publicly criticized by members of the relevant community and good behavior and accomplishments to be celebrated. From my white perspective, that is not as common in the black community. There is this "we're all in the struggle together" attitude that seems to want to excuse bad or irresponsible behavior as a byproduct of the struggle against racism. On the flip side, you get people who say that blacks who work hard, are responsible etc. are sell-outs, traitors, act white or are uncle toms. That is ridiculous. Also, I'm of the impression, and maybe I'm wrong on this, that most African immigrants from Africa and the Carribean (i.e. not long time African Americans)seem to have a different cultural work ethic than long time African Americans - i.e. they don't seem to make excuses and work, open businesses, work hard in school etc. Am I wrong in this? Is that the impression in the black community too? I have not read any studies or books on those points. What's your opinion on that?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 27, 2006 12:16 AM
Yes, low expectation and underachievement is a huge problem in the black community but we as a group are unwilling to address this issue head on or in a public forum. And you are also correct in your assessment that African-Americans are being leapfrogged by our brethrens from the Caribbean and Africa. It's a really a cultural thing that's extremely complicated but worth exploring.
What upsets me more than anything is the utter refusal of the black community to deal with these issues in any meaningful way that can produce tangible results. Why? Because it will require us to look into the mirror and makes some very painful admissions. Our extreme irrational defensiveness precludes us from engaging in any meaningful dialogue as anyone who is white that asserts black complicity or culpability is a racist and anyone black who cites the same is clearly an "Uncle Tom" with a hidden agenda.
Someday, hopefully sooner than later, I think this internal audit of our community will happen. The Million Man March with it's focus on black personal responsibility and atonement was a step in the right direction but ultimately failed in this endeavor. People marched, listened to speeches, made promises to return to their respective communities to assist in spearheading a new black renaissance movement but in the end nothing sustainable ever came to fruition.
People must accept the fact that self-analysis will be a very painful and divisive exercise. It will be a difficult process laced with internal strife and unfair accusations. But no matter how painful it may be, we owe it to ourselves, our community and future generations to fix the myriad of issues that are plaguing our community.
I personally think that we need to develop a comprehensive strategy aimed at changing the culture in the black community because the best of our culture is being high jacked by the worst. IMO, you can put the best teachers, books, computers and educational resources in black schools but if that child leaves school and returns home to a family structure or community that embodies a culture that doesn't value education then it's all for naught.
In the black community, attitude and culture must be changed in order to break the cycle of poverty and despair. The government or legislative measures can't help us in this regard. The changes must come from within…..
Posted by: BrownBomber at May 1, 2006 8:45 AM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.