House of the Day: 83 Downing Street

Everyone knows we're huge Clinton Hill boosters but that doesn't mean we think the sky's the limit when it comes to pricing. There was some discussion last week about 369 Grand Avenue where some people thought our estimates were too low. This place on Downing, while certainly a decent-looking house from the outside (the one interior shot doesn't reveal much in the way of detail other than the fireplace), strikes us as aggressively priced at $1.55 million. Especially when you consider that, in addition to being further, it is a good five feet shallower than a brownstone like 369 Grand. Or like the house at 300 Washington that recently sold for $1.6 million. Seems to us that they'll be lucky to get $1.35 million. Can anyone provide any more description of the interior?
83 Downing Street [Corcoran] GMAP P*Shark
20 Comments
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 12:01 PM
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 12:13 PM
Do any of you CH/FG'ers know anything about Washington Park - I think that it is at the top of FG Park between DeKalb and Willoughby??
Does anything come on the market on this block? If so, does anyone have any idea what one would expect to pay for a brownstone on that block - I know that's open ended depending on condition etc. but a view on range would be interesting to hear...
Basically trying to find out if I could afford anything here!!
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 12:15 PM
I think what could dampen the price would be whether it is across the street from the school playground, and the attendant noise. Other than that, it is hard to say if the price is justified if we don't have more interior shots. It is a landmarked block I believe.
Nearby, across Fulton Street on Lefferts Place (No. 63 Lefferts Place I think) a 2 fam brownstone (triplex over garden apt) that was aking $1.495MM and quickly went into contract after a couple of weeks on the market (for around asking give or take, as I understand it) - then again, it's a quiet street, the house has lots of details throughout and is in good shape (I saw it at an open house), plus it's 22 feet wide, 45 feet deep with 140 foot lot. http://www.bhsbrooklyn.com/detail.asp?id=470086
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 12:17 PM
A nice brownstone on Washington Park (which turns into Cumberland Street after you cross Dekalb) was sold by Aguayo and Huebener a little over a year ago. It was listed at $1.975MM if I remember correctly and I think it went for around asking, if not more.
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 12:23 PM
There was also an A&H 4 story 1 family that was, I think, almost the last brownstone on that block of Washington Park (near Myrtle ... and the Projects) that went into contract - asked $1.6MM. I was looking at the time. A&H leaves a lot of their "in contract" or sold houses on their website under an "in contract" section, even after they've sold. You might be able to find some references in there - though they are probably quite old.
By CrownHeightsProud on March 20, 2006 1:19 PM
I dunno, but for $1.55M, I certainly should get more pictures on a Corcoran website, which makes me think they don't think it's worthy either. For one thing, for that amount of bucks, I want the original double parlour doors, and the floors look like new wood replacement flooring. Looks like all the detail except for the fireplace is gone. That room wouldn't be bad for the rental, or even a bedroom, but not for the main parlour. The picture makes it look very narrow too. Hmmm - If I was in the market, I'd keep looking.
By Tinarina on March 20, 2006 1:27 PM
It always gives me pause when no photos of the kitchen or bathrooms are included; I assume they must be bad. And if so, this price seems high for Downing Street.
By anon on March 20, 2006 2:01 PM
if this house was 4 blocks over (or so) you'd have to call it bed-stuy...$1.5MM.. you got to be kidding.
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 2:22 PM
2.01pm, not that I necessarily think that the price is correct, but it is not "4 blocks over". As they say, "location, location, location". Also, Bed Stuy, bordering Clinton Hill, is rising in price now, in part, because of the rising Clinton Hill prices.
By anon on March 20, 2006 2:29 PM
I dont care what people say the "new" boundaries are for bed-stuy, but bedford ave is 4 blocks over...that is bed-stuy.
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 3:20 PM
My point is that whether or not this price is justified, this listing is not bed stuy.
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 3:27 PM
It's not bed stuy. Bed Stuy starts at Classon, two blocks away. Clinton Hill is a small neighborhood. You're never more that a few blocks from another neighborhood. Walk two blocks, you're at the Bed Study border, walk three or four blocks from this location and you're in Prospect Heights, walk six blocks in another direction and you're on the FG border... Point is, Clinton Hill (and Fort Greene) are small neighborhoods. I doubt that this place is necessarily priced realistically, but to bash it because it is a couple of blocks from the Bed Stuy border doesn't make sense since you're always close to another neighborhood no matter where you are in clinton hill. The Lefferts Place listing discussed above is one block from Classon and went into contract for at or near asking of $1.495 (much nicer house and good block).
By anon on March 20, 2006 4:06 PM
I didn't realize by pointing out that $1.55 mm for its location (and yes, that also means the fact it's VERY close to Bed-Stuy) is the same as "bashing" it.
By Anonymous on March 20, 2006 4:47 PM
My point is that all of Clinton Hill is "very" close to Bed Stuy considering that the neighborhood is only 8-9 blocks wide from east to west. You can walk from the $4M Pfizer mansion and be on Classon in Bed Stuy in 7 or 8 minutes. Sure, some streets are nicer than others, but I wouldn't be as concerned about how close you are to the Bed-Stuy border as much as what your block is like (e.g. is it noisy, is it close to the subway, is it across from a school etc).
By Anonymous on March 21, 2006 12:54 AM
As a nearby resident of Putnam Avenue, prices like this concern me. We still have a drug dealing and prostitution problem in our lil' corner of the lil ole neighborhood called Clinton Hill. There are a bunch of overpriced properties sitting vacant because the owners want Washington Avenue prices. Thus the improving of the neighborhood has stalled over here.
By Anonymous on March 21, 2006 9:38 AM
I know of a couple of bed-stuy prostitutes who are charging Washington Ave prices, but for the most part the drug supply is still ghetto quality premium crack.
By lutbrink on March 21, 2006 10:50 AM
We are former Fort Greeners who relocated to Bed Stuy. Is there a drug problem here? Yes. But, incredible as it sounds, we feel MUCH safer here than in Fort Greene where two people were shot outside of the building next door, and there are many, many more muggings. Some of the blocks around Classon and Grand are actually funkier with more crime problems -- not only drugs, but prostiitution as anon 9:38 a.m pointed out --- than the choicer Bed Stuy blocks, such as Jefferson, Hancock, Decatur and McDonough, the housing stock is in a different class than many Clinton Hill properties. In addition, those Bed Stuy streets have better subway access to the A train. So in some cases, Bed Stuy houses are getting higher prices than Clinton Hill houses. Buying a house near the Bed Stuy border does not bring its price down because it is tainted with Bed Stuy. but because the housing stock around there is not great, the crime problems have not been resolved, and the subway access is lousy.
By Anonymous on March 21, 2006 12:20 PM
Depends what part of the Bed Stuy border you are talking about. If you are near Fulton, you are by the Clinton/Washington C line, so the subway access is not lousy at all.
As for people trying to price a house too high, they'll figure it out if the house sits for too long. I've seen a few in the area go for good prices. I have not seen any Bed Stuy houses generally commanding more than Clinton Hill, so I'm not sure if I agree with that comment.
By Anonymous on March 21, 2006 12:28 PM
Bstoner is close to the BedStuy border in Clinton Hill. Boy, his house sure is a dump. What poor housing stock in Clinton Hill near Bed Stuy. Puhlease.
By Anonymous on March 21, 2006 8:28 PM
My point (anon 12:54) is not that the housing stock is worse (altho it is less grand than either blocks to the east (Bed-stuy) or west (haute Clinton Hill)) or that the proquinquity of Bed-stuy is a problem, but rather that this is a still funky corner of the hood. Just walk down the streets and you see more marginal activity. I also am not sure that families who own houses free and clear will necessarily lower their prices any time soon. 1000/ year real estate taxes aren;t enough to encourage moving the property along to new owners.
Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

and just a couple 'a blocks away from the prime minister. oh wait.