« Development Watch: 117-119 Court Street Wednesday Photo of the Day »

March 29, 2006

HOTD: Another Follow-Up on 730 Fulton Street

house house
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt. 730 Fulton, a corner property in the Ratner-created Atlantic Commons townhouse complex, came on the market last August at $1.5 million. Our take, which was largely echoed by the readership (except for the surprising number of owners of other houses in the Commons who for some reason thought the price sounded just right), was that this was a ridiculous stretch. So three months later, the price was cut to $1.4 million. Still no takers. Now the price has been trimmed to $1.375 million and we'll reiterate our stance that this baby still has a long way to go. All we can guess is that the current owner is in no particular rush to sell and is taking the attitude that all it takes is one fool to make his day. We also hear that the owner dumped a lot of dough into customizing the interior that he thinks he should get paid for. As is usually the case, this is unlikely to happen in our opinion. At $1.1 million, we say, he might start seeing some interest. More than that? Not bloody likely.
730 Fulton Street [NYT Listings] GMAP
Fulton Newbie Asking Too Much [Brownstoner]
Open House Picks: Pressure Drop [Brownstoner]
Decent Townhouse Reproductions? [Brownstoner]




Comments

Growing some ivy (which will likely cause the cement morter to crack) up the side of a rowhouse in a complex of middle to low income housing is not going to make it worth the price this person is asking, especially on busy Fulton Street. I think those houses are a success story and tastefully done. I understand that the ground floor must be owned (affordable housing when built) and the top floors could be rented. This contributes to the desire to keep them neat and tidy, as well as the gardens you see each spring. That is all well done and should serve as a model for future affordable housing. That said, this person is crazy to think that someone should pay brownstone prices for his place.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 11:54 AM

Loved reading through those old comments - all of those people insisting B'stoner would be wrong, he'd get his price. I bet he's regretting turning down that 1.3 offer, as I'm guessing he won't see anything in that range now.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 11:54 AM

If that's the house I think it is he could do himself a favor and clean up all of the refuse cluttered around his yard.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 12:33 PM

this is so absolutely ridiculous, I remember we were talking about this when it first came to market and their entire block association must've sent out a bat signal... they all started going on and on that the ppl living in the real world who suggested that he'd never get this price for this house were jealous of their lavish affordable-housing parking spaces and they should get what they deserve from their 275k (or however much they paid) investment by selling to idiots who may be willing to pay upwards of 1 million dollars for what is essentially low-income housing. this guy and everyone else over there must be mad anyone who pays more than 7-800k for this crap is out of their mind. if I had 1.5 million to spend I'd quickly take it to a REAL brownstone in Ft. Greene with actual details sans the tacky blinds and cheap ceiling fans. for 1.5 million there's sooooo much more out there and even at the current price... that house in stuy heights is absolutely gorgeous and cheaper and not on fulton. these ppl are crazy I tell ya!

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 12:35 PM

Who styled (or didn't style) those photos? Jezze, you think if they want to sell the place for over $1M they could clean up the kitchen counter and take the coats of the chairs in the living/dining room.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 12:40 PM

Don't you think the location, square footage and lot size is deserving of that price? Face it people, 1.5 million is no longer brownstone price in Fort Greene. You only come across that if the property needs a lot of work.
I think it's delusional to believe otherwise.
The winter and early spring months are usually the toughest time to sell real estate. On the flip side, it's the best time to find a good deal. But from what I see, prices keep steadily rising and we're no where near the hot months yet. If I owned that property, I wouldn't sell.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 12:55 PM

and what the heck did he customize? the interior pictures indicate he must have shoved most of his money on that stylistic ivy shrub growing all over the building because I'd be absolutely shocked that the couch/futon which is practically on the dinning room table and the green shag carpeting cluttered by crap to match the green blinds could be considered "customizing". please enlighten me...

Posted by: stuy blkbuttrflie. at March 29, 2006 12:59 PM

you're right, if you owned that property you wouldn't sell because no one would buy that at 1.5 million dollars.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 1:01 PM

Brownstoner, thanks for updating us on the status of that one. I was blown away by the price back in August! Still blown away by the price-chopped number, actually.

Posted by: Sloper at March 29, 2006 1:18 PM

Not sure what he customized...just heard that bit of color from a broker familiar with the situation yesterday.

Posted by: Brownstoner at March 29, 2006 1:24 PM

Wasn't this formerly listed with Citi Habitats? Guess their exclusive wasn't renewed -- but "Luxor Home & Investmet Realty" -- they can't even get their name right in the ad...don't think it's going to help.

Posted by: babs at March 29, 2006 1:27 PM

A two story, two-family frame cottage located on Dean St. (near 4th Ave and Atlantic) sold for over 1 million two years ago. No parking. Small back yard. Why is it hard to believe that someone would consider a three-family, semi-detached brick, on an oversized lot to be worth 500K more, 2 years later. This property is actually closer to the new hub (BAM, Atlantic Yards, restaurants, transportation, etc). Two bedroom condos across the street (Pacific) with half the square footage and no 'bonus' rental units are selling for close to, if not, over a million. I don't understand why you are all so shocked by the pricing.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 1:40 PM

If you could knock it down and build something on the lot, then we'd be talking.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 29, 2006 2:03 PM

Wow, over $1mil for formerly subsidized housing built by the NYC Partnership. I'm all for making a profit, but... on. Location can't be evertything -can it?

Reality check people.

Posted by: bedstuyer at March 30, 2006 9:47 AM

Who are you? The real estate police? Why are you dogging price increases in these neighborhoods? Increases are a GOOD thing. When you dog prices, you imply our neighborhoods are worth less.

Posted by: Ed at April 3, 2006 5:30 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions