« 215 Hancock Revisited: A 'Stoner's Wet Dream Wednesday Linkage »
January 31, 2006
House of the Day: Not Much Green for Greene

Another beauty in Bed Stuy today, this one a bit cheaper and a bit further out than yesterday's house. This 4-story, 3-family brownstone has some mad detail, including mahogany paneling, pier mirror and the ceiling mural. The top two floors, both of which are rentals, appear to have been tastefully renovated as well, so this looks to be in move-in condition which is unusual for a house under $800,000 with details. One slight negative: The building's only 18-feet wide, but it looks like one of those houses that pulls it off. Also, props to CityQwest for a very well presented listing. Any takers?
904 Greene Avenue [CityQwest] GMAP P*Shark
Comments
18 feet wide isn't bad. My house is 16 feet, and I'd love an extra two...
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 11:50 AM
I'd love to know the story of the ceiling mural. For example: How old is it? Was it painted on site or painted on canvas then applied?
Posted by: Hal at January 31, 2006 12:02 PM
I saw this listing and have been asking around about it. Would love to hear if anyone has seen it- ROAD TRIP...
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 12:03 PM
This is a lovely house. But $800,000 is still a LOT of green for Bed Stuy.
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 12:25 PM
Way up there in JMZ territory -- not nearly as nice a neighborhood as Stuyvesant Heights
I know someone who had a gorgeous painted ceiling in his brownstone -- unfortunately it was done with lead-based paint -- and he rented it out to some tenants who freaked out, sued him, and the remediation was a nightmare. So maybe if you use that only as an owner's residence -- but even so, what about your own kids?
Posted by: babs at January 31, 2006 12:51 PM
And it's $775K, not $800K, which isn't that bad considering a few blocks south, into the historic district, houses are going for upwards of $900K.
Posted by: babs at January 31, 2006 12:53 PM
That lead issue is interesting- wonder if the broker has addressed it with the buyer...
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 2:05 PM
Babs-- that's the strangest lead paint story i've ever heard. Of course the mural contained lead paint-- same as any painting, or building, painted before circa 1960. As far as domestic living goes, lead paint is only a health problem if kids eat it or lick it. I thought that it was only a liability issue if it was actively flaking, and/or was the top layer of paint within hand's reach. I can't believe that a someone would sue (and win?!) over a well-maintained historical ceiling. Sounds fishy to me.
Posted by: naomi at January 31, 2006 2:08 PM
Apparently his ceiling did start flaking -- that's what precipitated the whole problem. The tenants were also concerned about "microscopic flaking," i.e., dust, and he had to have the air tested. Whoever buys this place had better have the condition of those murals checked out.
And I don't think they won, but to fight it he had to remediate the problem. I don't know how it was ever resolved, except that they moved out and supposedly the lead paint issue was corrected -- I don't think it became anything like the stuff you see on the subway, with million dollar verdicts and all.
Posted by: babs at January 31, 2006 2:16 PM
Wow that is insane-- about the lead paint. My feeling is, if you live in NYC, you're lucky if lead paint on your ceiling is your closest toxin. I mean, really, "microscopic flaking"??? I hate it how some people take having kids as license to enact all of their craziest paranoias...
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 3:15 PM
Yeah, they were bizarre. By the time they moved out they had all these air filter things in every room, with plastic tubes going out the windows, surrounded by duct tape -- just what that was supposed to achieve I don't know, but it sure looked scary as heck!
But I've even had childless couples, moving into newly gut-renovated buildings (hence no lead paint anywhere because nothing was left of the old construction), go all paranoid and start asking to see lead paint test results, etc. In the meantime just pushing your stroller down Seventh Ave puts plenty of dust and exhaust fumes into baby's lungs and is much more of a hazard than anything he'll be exposed to at home.
Posted by: babs at January 31, 2006 3:45 PM
I always wonder where the parents were when their kids were chewing on the woodwork or licking the floors. I mean, even if the lead paint is encapsulated, if you chew deep enough, you'll hit it...
Posted by: broadway at January 31, 2006 4:10 PM
my husband and i saw this house on sunday. it is beautiful. there is some damage to the mural in the rear parlor ceiling but looks as if it might be fixable if you are creative.
Posted by: arli*girl at January 31, 2006 4:23 PM
The problem is that most of the kids eating peeling paint, etc., weren't being watched by anyone -- sadly to say, lead poisoning is not a disease that usually affects middle class people and above, which is why these people's concerns were a bit wacko. Most peeling lead pain is in old, poorly maintained buildings inhabited by poorer people, who unfortunately don't have the time/financial and emotional resources/cultural background/education/maturity/energy/health/whatever term you want to use to pay such close attention to their kids. We all know the horror stories, and, like most horror stories, they are exceptions. Fortunately. But when they do occur, they aren't going to be happening in 3/4 million dollar brownstones.
Posted by: babs at January 31, 2006 4:38 PM
you know that architectural salvage taken out of a home that was being converted to a home for girls (or something)? where is that stuff now and can I see it online? anyone know?
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 5:04 PM
http://www.circaantiquesltd.com/Pictures/Architectural/ARCHITECTURAL.htm
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 5:29 PM
Microscopic lead paint particles come from simple acts like raising and lowering a window sash and bumping a baseboard with your vacuum cleaner. Followed by a child crawling on the floor, you have a problem. It isn't that the parents aren't watching. Chelation therapy is no fun and is no guarantee to reverse damage. And lead paint it isn't just a problem of the lower class. I'd be concerned in any historic structure--and I am not the hysterical type.
Posted by: kea at January 31, 2006 6:03 PM
dude, thanks!
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 7:03 PM
Under a million for a house in bedford stuyvesant? Hard to believe. Must have been a typo or something.
Posted by: Anonymous at January 31, 2006 9:32 PM
Uhhm, because that's not really Bed Stuy. We are talking Bushwick Bill.
Posted by: Pinky at February 1, 2006 8:56 AM
Oh, of course, under $1 million in Bushwick, incredible bargain. What was I thinking.
Posted by: Anonymous at February 1, 2006 9:01 AM
Sorry, but that's still in Bed- Stuy, the border is Broadway.
Posted by: Anonymous at February 1, 2006 9:17 AM
A friend's toddler was recently diagnosed with extremely high lead levels. These folks own a lovely brownstone. It does have older windows, and they had had painting done and perhaps had not cleaned sufficiently. Lead paint poisoning is not simply an affliction of the poor. It can affect anyone who lives in a home with lead paint.
Posted by: Anonymous at February 1, 2006 10:44 AM
Wow, thanks, good to know -- hope all brownstone owners are checking things out here!
Posted by: babs at February 1, 2006 1:45 PM
But couldn't he have picked up the lead elsewhere as well? Maybe the soil in the backyard or something? Scary!
Posted by: babs at February 1, 2006 1:46 PM
It's not just brownstones. It's anything built prior to 1978 (or maybe it's 79). Realtors (and inspectors) are supposed to give you a lead paint disclosure form. I noticed that I did not receive one when I recently closed on my Brooklyn brownstone.
Posted by: anon at February 1, 2006 3:14 PM
That form is pretty meaningless -- no landlord ever has any evidence of any lead paint hazards, the agent initials it to say he/she has duly informed the client of any lead paint hazards (kind of hard to do when there's no evidence of any), and the tenant/owner initials to say he/she has received a copy of the pamphlet describing how to protect your child from lead. It was extremely remiss of the seller's broker not to get this to you, but it wouldn't have helped much if he/she had.
I've read that wiping down windowsills with a baby wipe or similar on a daily basis will take care of lead dust from opening the window, as well as what blows in from the street (from exhaust fumes etc. -- though with the switch to unleaded gas this is reduced).
One other thought -- could the above poster's child have gotten sick from lead pipes? No matter where you are, just to be safe, you should always let the water run for 15 seconds before drinking or showering -- that's enough to clear out all lead residue.
Posted by: babs at February 1, 2006 3:43 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.