Down-Zoning Movement Gaining in Carroll Gardens

building
The down-zoning movement is gaining momentum in Carroll Gardens, reports Brooklyn Papers, where many residents want to see a 50-foot height restriction imposed on the Brownstone neighborhood. The highest-profile offender? The six-story 11 Second Place which we discussed back in October. Our view then was that we didn't like the height but thought that otherwise the building looked nicer than most new developments in Brooklyn these days. Another development, 151 Carroll Street, is rising to a height of 58-feet on a site that used to house a one-story parking garage. “No one wants to freeze growth, but when you are dealing with a neighborhood that is largely two- or three-story buildings, you need some kind of height cap to preserve integrity,” says Simeon Bankoff of the Historic Districts Council. Some people obviously like the new digs on Second Place: The first five condos at 11 Second Place reportedly sold on their first day on the market; the last few sold quickly this fall.
It's Gettin' Ugly [Brooklyn Papers]
Carroll Gardens Down-Zoning? [The Real Estate]

Comments

Wow. I hadn't realized that Second Place had sold that quickly. What was $ per sf?

Posted by: Anon at January 17, 2006 10:10 AM

2- and 3-storey buildings? Hardly. Most of the buildings in the nabe are 3- and 4-storey buildings, with several 5-storey buildings in the mix as well. I live in CG (bought a condo around the corner fomr the 2nd place building last year) and, though I would enjoy the lack of condo competition a downzoning would afford me, there is no need to resort to exaggeration. And, 'Stoner is right -- the building does tower over the neighborhood, but is indeeed a much more attarctive structure than most new construction. It is also an improvement over some of the few single-storey abborations, which are, arguably, more out of place - even though some of them ahve been there longer.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 17, 2006 10:17 AM

Brooklyn Papers sure print a lot of this overdevelopment garbage. Also, who would describe 11 Second Place as ultra-modern, I guess you have throw on some 1870's ornaments to be contextual.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 17, 2006 5:14 PM

"you need some kind of height cap to preserve integrity"
What does that mean? Sounds like he's stoned.

Posted by: JoshK at January 17, 2006 8:08 PM

« Flatter Yield Curve, Longer-Term Fixed Rate Lock New! Straight From The Architect's Mouth »

January 17, 2006

Down-Zoning Movement Gaining in Carroll Gardens

Comments

Post a comment

Latest Restaurant Additions