« Look Back: Turn of Century Bedford Stuyvesant Halloween on First Place: Day 1 »
October 24, 2005
House of the Day: Different in Ditmas
It's not everyday that you see a house for under $500,000. Of course, it's not everyday that non-freestanding Victorians in Ditmas Park show up on our radar screens either (we suspect the broker may be using the neighborhood definition a little liberally). As a result, we don't have a whole hell of a lot to compare this to. It doesn't look half bad though: Only two floors plus English basement, but there are definitely a lot of of serious period details. The listing mentions the fact that there is no C of O on the building which could make getting a mortgage a little dicey, so proceed with caution. If anyone knows this neck of the woods well, it would be useful to hear about safety, infrastructure, etc.
East 23rd Street House [Corcoran] GMAP
Comments
This house may well be in Ditmas Park proper... There are several "pockets" of limestones, tudor row houses, not to mention Albermarle and Kenmar Terraces, landmarked streets that of Victorian Flatbush. One of thes pristine houses with fabulous original detail, great garden, integral garage, beautiful setting, sold recently for under $700K.... Through Brown Harris Stevens, I think... A total undiscovered jewel. I have some photos of these terraced homes in the nabe - I'm intrigued by them and have been telling friends that they are probably a great value in a neighborhood which is "gentifying" rapidly.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 24, 2005 12:58 PM
Julie Kestyn is pushing another one of these terraced limestone homes for under $500k - not sure if it's the same one, though:
http://www.kestyn.com/content/listdetail.html/24005264?proppos=14&ag_id=923509&pageclicked=2&RowCount=15&startpos=11&endpos=20&ids=16007537,26041749,21781024,24005264,29336068&propertyCount=15
Her pix are down - don't know why. They were there last week.
The Corcoran House, on East 23rd Street, depending on the cross streets, is in what's known as the South Midwood or Brooklyn College Neighborhood of Victorian Flatbush. The best buys can be found here, as these homes are on the other side of Ocean Avenue and there are few amenities over there... except for educational institutions, like Midwood High School (more Westinghouse scholars than anywhere else in the country); Hudde Middle School and its fabulous gifted program - they produced the national ms chess chamption this year, and of course, good old Brooklyn College with its Rhode Scholar, fabulous faculty, and picturesque campus.... a few quality stores and restaurants would help, though.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 24, 2005 1:14 PM
The house appears to be at 419 E 23rd.
Posted by: judson at October 24, 2005 1:18 PM
This house is officially in South Midwood - yes part of Victorian Flatbush.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 24, 2005 1:20 PM
FYI, no C-O is not necessarily a problem. If it is to be used as single family, then definately not a problem. If it is to be used as a multi-family, then they might be grand-fathered and would only need what I believe is called a "certificate of no objection" from the DOB.
Much would depend on how the house was configured prior to the first available DOB filings. An expeditor, such as Scott Schnall, can usually do the research and tell you pretty quickly what the C-O situation will involve.
In my case, I needed a new 2-fam C-O (where non existed) because the home had been used as a single-family since it was built. So, unfortunately, no grandfathering for me.
Posted by: Miguel at October 24, 2005 1:58 PM
Miguel you are right - I purchased my two family home (which was always a two family home) with no C of O. I was told since it was built before 1935 (Im not too sure of this year) that I would not need one to close - and mine was an FHA backed mortgage.
Posted by: Stacey at October 24, 2005 2:51 PM
Corcoran's comment that the basement could be easily converted to a rental seems presumptuous. That actually looks like a cellar, and if it is there is no way to get a legal dwelling down there.
Posted by: brklynarchtct at October 24, 2005 3:00 PM
This looks very similar to houses in PLG -- and some of them do have basement apartments. You wouldn't want to live in one of them though -- they're dark and the garden is off the first level (what would be the parlor floor in most traditional townhouses), so these really are basements.
I know someone in PLG (their house was on the tour last spring) -- they converted half the basement into a great screening room and half to a home spa -- great! My landlord has converted his into two bedrooms - but to make a real apartment of it, necessitating kitchen, etc., would make things pretty small and gloomy!
Posted by: Anonymous at October 24, 2005 5:13 PM
I was thinking that the layout of this house was a lot like those on the PLG tour last year... Some of them were beauifully refurbished... but I kept thinking - these houses are tiny!!! It was hard to believe that they were built to accomodate turn of the century families who generally had a few children. You would absolutely have to convert the basement into a den, or even an extra bedroom, but it would be gloomy. The screening room was a smart way to handle the space. That said, this house in Ditmas Park goes for about a third less than what they would be asking over in PLG... Great for a couple or a very small family.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 24, 2005 5:57 PM
I agree -- PLG is overpriced. This definitely looks a better deal -- the transportation is the same, just a few more stops away (B and Q at Newkirk and Ocean Aves and 2 and 5 at Newkirk and Flatbush Aves.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 24, 2005 6:50 PM
I saw that house on the tour (I think it was on Maple St) and I thought the whole house was wonderful (I loved the kitchen and the huge bedroom and bathroom on the second floor), and an ideal way to handle the lack of space, and it convinced me that those houses are perfect for a childless couple, but for a family -- I agree, things would be pretty tight.
Posted by: babs at October 24, 2005 6:55 PM
Still hating on PLG, eh. I guess that means we've arrived.
Posted by: Nativegal at October 24, 2005 8:15 PM
I'm not sure I understand Nativegal's comments. I think PLG is gorgeous... but alont of those limestones, particularly the Chicago style, despite being very classically beautiful, are Lillipution once you put in a decent sized bathroom. A childless couple or a family with only one child would do well with the space. But much to cramped for a bigger family. The Georgian brick houses on Maple, however, with the beautiful grounds,are quite another story... When will one of those grand homes be on the tour? I keep hoping... I actually could have bought one of those for $800k about 5 years ago. It was gorgeous... tremendous detail. In the end we opted for a distinctive, but not as nearly as beautiful, house in Flatbush.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 24, 2005 9:01 PM
Not every limestone in PLG is the same in size. Some are actually humongous.
Posted by: GardensGal at October 25, 2005 12:25 AM
Getting back to this house -- I'm not sure if the poster above is saying that it is as "tiny" as the PLG houses (which I'm not familiar with), but from the Corcoran floorplan, it seems to be about 20' x 43'. Granted, it's not a five-story monster, but it's not exactly a dollhouse either.
Posted by: linusvanpelt at October 25, 2005 7:44 AM
This house is very close to the Flatbush Junction, if that helps anyone who is not familiar with the area otherwise. It is quite a ways from Prospect Park. There are few amenities, but it is within the borders of the official Victorian Flatbush nabe (South Midwood). South Midwood has the fewest amenities, farthest from the park, least amount of gentirification in all of Victorian Flatbush. Which is why enormous houses loaded with detail can still be picked up there for $800k and under. Fat chance of finding that elsewhere in Victorian Flatbush. South Midwood will not benefit greatly from the new Cortelyou Road streetscape, either. It's just too far away (Bev Squares East and West and Ditmas Park West will do nicely out of it, though). South Midwood is geographically cut-off and will need to create another "hub" to compete with other parts of the neighborhood.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 25, 2005 9:05 AM
By the way, I bought in VicFlatbush several years ago and got one of the last decent buys... There was not much in the way of shopping or amenities back then, and things have improved dramatically in just a few years. BUT, if I were in the same boat and house shopping here today, I would be buying in South Midwood and working together with the community to improve the neighborhood. Not only do you get a grea house for a great price that way, but you bond with like-minded people who are also investing time and energy in a wonderfully rewarding project. It makes for great community spirit. I've said this before and I'll say it again - it's not just the homes that make Victorian Flatbush unique - there's also a lot to be said for the people in them.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 25, 2005 9:08 AM
I have looked at a nearby house that was similarly priced by Kestyn. The immediate neighborhood is still really sketchy -- Lots of ambulances, cop cars, and truck noise from nearby Flatbush Ave. Flatbush Ave still tends to be really noisy around there. It may be close to Vic Flatbush but it is environmentally light years away. Hence the price.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 25, 2005 10:35 AM
The area where this house is has alot of apartment buildings and not many private houses. It is not a great area to live yet, crime and such. I think the area may be considered East Flatbush (E 23 between Newkirk and Ditmas is kind of crappy).
Probably should be worth less, but everyone overprices these days.
Posted by: Elie at October 26, 2005 12:32 AM
I agree... I went over to see the location for myself. While technically part of South Midwood, it borders East Flatbush and definately has more of the feel of that neighborhood... Having said that, we know a family from the Slope who bought a home on nearby Vanderveer Place, the other side of Flatbush, sort of near Sears... It's a lovely street with adorable terraced houses with porticos. It also has won Brooklyn's Greenest Block award several times... It is, however, definitely East Flatbush...
Posted by: Anonymous at October 26, 2005 8:56 AM
clomid side effects http://www.noonhost.com/clomidsideeffec/clomid side effects http://www.gogetforum.com/clomid/clomid.html
Posted by: clomid pregnancy at June 29, 2006 8:51 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.