« Blimpie Foes Aim to Deflate Plan "Brooklyn" 101st Most Popular Name Last Year »
June 29, 2005
Business Week on the Bubble Question
Business Week tackled the bubble question last week. One of the experts interviewed was Frank Nothaft, chief economist, Freddie Mac, whose view, we'll admit, should be taken with a grain of salt given the vested interest his employer has in keeping the party going:
Housing is local, local, local by nature, and it's the local economy driving valuation of a home. The large markets people think about -- New York, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Washington D.C. -- where we've seen double-digit home-value gains in the last three or four years, are driven by economic growth and rising family income, coupled with a 40-year low in mortgage rates. I would worry about local markets that have weak economies, where the unemployment rate has gone up over the last couple years, or where we have begun to see a bit more of a speculative fervor (by that I mean: A lot of investor vs. owner-occupant purchases).
Comment: New York economy seems okay and very low investor-to-owner ratio.
Housing Bubble -- or Bunk? [Business Week]
Comments
Wait til Wall Street has a bad year and see what happens
Posted by: Skeptical at June 29, 2005 10:27 AM
I made the point a month ago that nyc has the lowest percentage of investor owned property in the country. People actually want to live here.
I'm wondering when the media bubble about the real estate bubble will burst. CNN actually has a homepage feature called "BubbleWatch". Keep watching...
Posted by: synonymous at June 29, 2005 8:38 PM
Can please direct me to recent statistics to support the claim that NYC has comparatively low investor ownership?
Posted by: Anonymous at June 30, 2005 2:55 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.