« Cablevision To Debut 24-Hour Brooklyn Channel Long Island City: Building Bonanza on Horizon »
June 9, 2005
Atlantic Yards: Sealed With a Kiss?


In the collective post mortem that's going on over the defeat of the West Side stadium, much is being made of how well in contrast Ratner navigated the treacherous waters of politics and money get his Nets project to the point where it now looks like a done deal. The Times notes, among other things, Ratner's effort to engage local officials and community leaders, especially those with an early pre-disposition against the project. The pivotal point, it now seems, was the agreement that Ratner cut with Acorn to guarantee more minority contracting, job training and community use of the arena. When Acorn's director Bertha Lewis gave both Mayor Bloomberg and Bruce Ratner big smackers on the lips at Borough Hall last month, it was all over. Although, according to Curbed, some would disagree.
Arena in Brooklyn Is Still a Go [NY Times]
Sealed With a Kiss [Brooklyn Papers, photos by Tom Callan]
Uproar from the Anti-Ratner Table [Curbed]
Comments
Gross gross gross
Posted by: Anonymous at June 9, 2005 10:40 AM
The kisses gauarantee nothing.
here, read this, it was published in today's NY Sun.
Dear Editors:
Regarding Monday's editorial, "Brooklyn Fairy Tale," the most insidious aspect of the non-binding, "affordable" housing deal between Forest City Ratner (FCR) and ACORN, trumpeted by Mayor Bloomberg, is this: the Mayor, Marty Markowitz and Bertha Lewis made big hoopla about a 50-50 housing deal, at a Brooklyn Borough Hall press conference about two weeks ago. One week later at a City Council hearing on the Atlantic Yards proposal, FCR announced that what was once 4,500 proposed housing units is now 7,300 housing units, with no commitment at all to make any of those 2,800 additional units "affordable." So what was loudly called a "groundbreaking" 50-50 agreement is now, in reality, a non-binding agreement that would include a miniscule 6% of housing for truly low-income earners and 24% for "moderate" earners, leaving 70% luxury. That's called bait and switch. And guess what? Half of the rents of the so called "affordable" units are market rate rents that you could find walking into any real estate office in the areas surrounding the proposed development in Prospect Heights, Brooklyn. We, the taxpayers of New York City and State, are subsidizing Ratner's market and luxury rate housing–as well as the most expensive private sports arena ever built–to the tune of $1.6 billion, and rising, in public subsidies. Why?
Posted by: Bo Guss at June 9, 2005 3:33 PM
we not only pay for this but we will have to live with it. Second is much worst.
Posted by: Anonymous at June 9, 2005 4:00 PM
ok- you make claim of $1.6bil in subsidies.
How is this figure arrived? how much for arena itself? how much for rest?
What are the subsidies? direct payments? tax abatements? please explain.
Posted by: Anonymous at June 9, 2005 4:49 PM
Wow....we better make some noise people. They're trying to sling something by us!!!
Does anybody know who I can write an email to regarding opposition to this stadium?
Posted by: Anonymous at June 10, 2005 9:27 AM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.